Next Article in Journal
Detection of Acanthamoeba from Acanthamoeba Keratitis Mouse Model Using Acanthamoeba-Specific Antibodies
Next Article in Special Issue
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) Mediated Optimization of Medium Components for Mycelial Growth and Metabolites Production of Streptomyces alfalfae XN-04
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Different Substrates on the Morphological Features and Polyols Production of Endomyces magnusii Yeast during Long-Lasting Cultivation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Improved Biocontrol Agent, F1-35, Protects Watermelon against Fusarium Wilt by Triggering Jasmonic Acid and Ethylene Pathways

Microorganisms 2022, 10(9), 1710; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091710
by Xiao-Min Dong †, Qing-Gui Lian †, Jing Chen, Rui-Min Jia, Zhao-Feng Zong, Qing Ma and Yang Wang *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Microorganisms 2022, 10(9), 1710; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091710
Submission received: 17 July 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 22 August 2022 / Published: 25 August 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The Figures 2 and 3 and Table 2 were difficult to relate to the presented results. BP, MP, and CC were not defined in Figures. These figures were providing Gene ontology annotation for the check treatment only, but in the results, the authors listed the differences associated with the biocontrol agent compared to the check.  Is there no way to put that information into a figure or table, rather than concentrating on only the check in your figure 2 and 3?  The discussion presented better details on the results concerning Table 2, than did the results section, though in some cases, the differentially expressed proteins in Table 2 were not the same presented as in the discussion.   Table 2 is poorly presented and should be redone so that it is easier to follow.  In the literature section, number 15 should be Meloidogyne incognita, with both words in italics. Number 72, the l in lycopersici should be lower case.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In the present study, the authors have studied the efficacy of biocontrol agent F1-35 against watermelon Fusarium wilt. Results of this study showed biocontrol agent F1-35 improves the resistance of the watermelon plant by triggering JA and ET pathways. The manuscript is well written except for some minor grammatical errors. The findings of this study corroborated earlier reports. However, the discussion section of the manuscript is written poorly. It should be discussed concerning the earlier watermelon and FON interaction findings.  

Following some comments, authors can consider improving the manuscript draft.

 

1.       Introduction: page 1, line 33 and 35- Correct “Watermelon Fusarium wilt” as “Fusarium wilt of watermelon”

2.       Introduction: page 1, line 35-37- Rewrite the sentence in the context of pathogen which causes wilt in watermelon.

3.       Introduction: page 2, line 49- change “Fusarium oxysporum” to “F. Oxysporum”

4.       Introduction: page 2, line 49- Add some recent literature findings related to FON and watermelon interaction through JA. Please refer article by Kasote et al., 2020, BMC plant biology.

5.       Material and methods: page 3, line-99- Change “varietsy” to “variety”.

6.       Merge section 2.5.3. and 2.5.4.

7.       Material and methods: page 5, line-206- Correct “65°C to 95°C” to “65-95°C

8.       Discussion: page 13, line 346- delete repeated “Fusarium oxysporum”

 

9.       Material and methods: page 5, line-250- check “plant et al.,?? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop