Next Article in Journal
Rhizocarpon geographicum Lichen Discloses a Highly Diversified Microbiota Carrying Antibiotic Resistance and Persistent Organic Pollutant Tolerance
Next Article in Special Issue
Candidatus Mycoplasma Haemoalbiventris’ and Tick-Borne Pathogens in Black-Eared Opossum (Didelphis aurita) from Southeastern Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Strong Biofilm Formation and Low Cloxacillin Susceptibility in Biofilm-Growing CC398 Staphylococcus aureus Responsible for Bacteremia in French Intensive Care Units, 2021
Previous Article in Special Issue
First Report of Bartonella spp. in Marsupials from Brazil, with a Description of Bartonella harrusi sp. nov. and a New Proposal for the Taxonomic Reclassification of Species of the Genus Bartonella
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Review of the Distribution of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Wild Animals and Their Ticks in the Mediterranean Rim between 2000 and 2021

1
UMR CNRS Science Pour l’Environnement 6134, Université de Corse Pascal Paoli, Projet GEM, 20250 Corte, France
2
ANSES, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, UMR BIPAR, Laboratoire de Santé Animale, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(9), 1858; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091858
Submission received: 29 July 2022 / Revised: 28 August 2022 / Accepted: 14 September 2022 / Published: 16 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vector-Borne Infections in Wildlife)

Abstract

:
Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) can be divided into three groups: bacteria, parasites, and viruses. They are transmitted by a wide range of tick species and cause a variety of human, animal, and zoonotic diseases. A total of 148 publications were found on tick-borne pathogens in wild animals, reporting on 85 species of pathogens from 35 tick species and 17 wild animal hosts between 2000 and February 2021. The main TBPs reported were of bacterial origin, including Anaplasma spp. and Rickettsia spp. A total of 72.2% of the TBPs came from infected ticks collected from wild animals. The main tick genus positive for TBPs was Ixodes. This genus was mainly reported in Western Europe, which was the focus of most of the publications (66.9%). It was followed by the Hyalomma genus, which was mainly reported in other areas of the Mediterranean Rim. These TBPs and TBP-positive tick genera were reported to have come from a total of 17 wild animal hosts. The main hosts reported were game mammals such as red deer and wild boars, but small vertebrates such as birds and rodents were also found to be infected. Of the 148 publications, 12.8% investigated publications on Mediterranean islands, and 36.8% of all the TBPs were reported in seven tick genera and 11 wild animal hosts there. The main TBP-positive wild animals and tick genera reported on these islands were birds and Hyalomma spp. Despite the small percentage of publications focusing on ticks, they reveal the importance of islands when monitoring TBPs in wild animals. This is especially true for wild birds, which may disseminate their ticks and TBPs along their migration path.

1. Introduction

Pathogens are one of the biggest worldwide heath threats. Zoonotic pathogens target both humans and animals, whereas non-zoonotic pathogens infect either animals or humans. Zoonotic pathogens represent more than half of the pathogens worldwide and provoke mainly emerging diseases [1]. Some bacteria, parasites, and viruses can circulate by the way of arthropod vectors with hematophagous behavior [2], such as mosquitoes, ticks, or sandflies due to their blood-sucking practices. Vector-borne diseases annually cause over 17% of infections and 700,000 deaths across the globe [3]. Tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) are not only of veterinary importance—they also include zoonotic pathogens harmful for humans [4].
Ticks (Ixodida) are the main carrier of veterinary pathogens and the second most important vector of human pathogens, right after mosquitoes [5,6]. These hematophagous arthropods belong to the Ixodida order, which is composed of three families. The first, Ixodidae, is further divided into the Prostriasta composed of the subfamily Ixodinae and the genus Ixodes; and the Metastriata composed of all other subfamilies and eight genera, Anamalohimalaya, Cosmiomma, Dermacentor, Hyalomma, Margaropus, Nosomma, Rhipicentor, and Rhipicephalus. These “hard ticks” represent most tick species. The second family, Argasidae, is divided into two subfamilies: the Argasinae, including the genus Argas, and Ornithodorinae, composed of the genera Ornithodoros, Otobius, and Carios. These are known as “soft ticks”. The third family is the Nuttallielliedae family, composed of one species [7]. The tick’s life cycle has four stages: egg, larva, nymph, and adult male or female. Their tropisms vary according to the species and life cycle stage. Ticks can have different tropisms to one, two, or more hosts. They can transmit various bacteria, viruses, and parasites [5] to a broad range of wild animals (whether mammalian, reptilian, amphibian, or avifaunal) [4,8,9,10,11].
Ticks and tick-borne diseases can spread by way of migratory birds. Their long-distance migration allows migratory birds to carry infected immature argasid and ixodid ticks to Europe from Africa or vice versa [12]. Migratory birds can be one of the ways ticks and tick-borne pathogens are disseminated because of the seasonality of their migration and the presence of stopover places (mainly wetlands) [12].
According to its geographic situation between diverse continents (Europe, Africa, and Western Asia), the Mediterranean Sea is enclosed by a large number of countries with a large spectrum of biotopes, ranging from a Mediterranean to an arid climate. The Mediterranean Rim is one of the areas most impacted by climate change, human activity, and animal migration [13,14]. While the increase in temperatures in Northern Europe fosters the development of ticks such as the genus Ixodes, further south, in the Mediterranean Rim, the development of a dry area with plants suited to an arid climate fosters the development of ticks such as the genus Hyalomma [15]. The fact that immature stages can feed on birds and remain attached to their host for a long period supports the idea of ticks’ dissemination by migratory birds [16].
This review focuses on the Mediterranean Rim, where various TBPs have been detected from wild animals and their ticks. To review the geographic distribution of these TBPs and highlight possible changes in their distribution in the future, four areas were taken under consideration: the Balkans, composed of Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Greece, Montenegro, and Slovenia; the Middle East, composed of Cyprus, Israel, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, and Turkey; North Africa, composed of Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia; and finally, Western Europe, composed of France, Italy, Malta, Monaco, and Spain. The different areas were determined by geographic proximity and common biotope. The last part of our review entailed focusing on the monitoring of TBPs in wild animals and their ticks on the western and eastern Mediterranean islands. This was particularly important for avifauna, as the islands could become hotspots during bird migrations.
The purpose of this study was to review the literature between 2000 and early 2021 on the presence of TBPs in wild animals and their ticks in the Mediterranean Rim, following PRISMA guidelines, with the objectives listed below:
-
Perform a bibliometric analysis of TBP studies.
-
Review the diversity of TBPs from wild animals and their ticks (engorged tick species positive for pathogens, and wild animal hosts with TBPs in the Mediterranean Rim).
-
Compare the distribution of TBPs found in wild animals and their ticks in the four main areas defined.
-
Focus on the distribution of TBPs on the Mediterranean islands.

2. Materials and Methods

We performed a literature review concerning TBPs in all the countries of the Mediterranean Rim (n = 22). We followed PRISMA guidelines [17] for the identification and selection of studies relevant to the topic. We compiled and analyzed the data from the studies included in this review.
All the articles published in international journals indexed by Scopus, PubMed, and/or Web of Science were taken into consideration (Figure 1). Only English articles were taken into account. The research date range was from 1 January 2000 to 31 February 2021. The keywords used were Pathogens AND Ticks AND each Mediterranean Rim country, with the “all fields” option to select the articles in which search items appeared in the title, abstract, and keywords. All papers considered case studies, literature review, “gray” literature, guides from relevant organizations, and abstracts in poster form from conferences were excluded. We also discarded diagnosis in humans and animals and clinical descriptions of disease. We selected studies targeting the distribution of TBPs and TBP-positive ticks in the Mediterranean Rim and Mediterranean islands. We excluded all duplicates and inaccessible articles (due to the languages or unavailability of the full text). Titles and abstracts were reviewed, and we applied inclusion/exclusion criteria to the 1070 articles selected. Filtering was based on the answers to the following questions:
  • Did the study include a country along the Mediterranean coastline? Yes/No
  • Did the study include tick-borne pathogens? Yes/No
  • Did the study exclude ticks collected among vegetation (flagging)? Yes/No
Publications targeting TBPs in wild animals and/or in engorged ticks collected from wildlife in Mediterranean countries were included. This gave us an overview of research on TBP-positive ticks supposedly infesting hosts and TBPs circulating among the wild animal population. The articles were saved if the answer to all three questions was “yes” and eliminated otherwise. The next step entailed reviewing the information of interest from the full text of 299 articles into a database. We also excluded articles that did not fit the criteria.
We next reviewed the bibliography of each selected article in order to check for new relevant articles to include in the review. The same steps previously described were used for these new articles. For the last step, we excluded articles on domestic animals (n = 232) and selected only articles dealing with wild animals (n = 148).
All the different selection steps are summarized in Figure 1, with an explanation of inclusion/exclusion criteria applied to articles for this review.
The data of interest were compiled in an Excel table that had previously been tested using 15 articles, and included the following information:
  • Main characteristics of the studies: article ID, years, authors, analytical, and statistical methodology.
  • Pathogen-related information: pathogens screened and detected, species, number of species, zoonotic status, host.
  • Tick-related information: species, type, number, stage.
  • Host-related information: groups, sedentary or migratory.
  • Area of interest: country, type of area, number of sampling sites.
The different outputs of the data worksheet were selected following mutual agreement from all the authors.

3. Bibliographic Analysis

The first article considered, published in 2001, was the only paper selected for that year. During the first decade investigated, there were few papers between 2001 and 2005, with a peak of three papers in 2004. The number of publications began to increase between 2006 and 2013, with a mean of 7.1 per year (ranging from five to eight papers per year). Of all the papers about TBPs in wild animals from the Mediterranean Rim, 57.4% were published between 2014 and 2020. The rate of papers published doubled from eight per year in 2013 to 16 per year in 2014. Between 2016 and 2020, the number of papers published per year continued to increase until it reached the highest value of both decades, with 18 publications in 2019. No paper was found in the first two months of 2021 (Figure 2).
This trend can be explained by three reasons: the increase in scientific interest about TBPs among wild animals and their ticks; the increase in accessibility to scientific journals and full-text publications; the evolution in TBP detection methodologies over the years and the development of molecular biology methodology.
Indeed, TBPs may be detected with three different types of methodology. Serological analysis is used to detect pathogens in fluids, tissue, and ticks by the way of antibodies, e.g., ELISA and immunofluorescence. Microscopic analysis was rarely used in the papers selected, although it is the most accurate method to confirm the presence of TBPs in samples. Molecular analysis covers techniques that detect the nuclear acids of TBPs in both ticks and animals, e.g., next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and high-throughput sequencing. These molecular techniques were the most frequently used in the selected publications, even though various techniques are available to monitor TBPs. The positive evolution in publications through the years appears to be due to the growing popularity of the molecular approach (Figure 2).

4. Tick-Borne Pathogens from Wild Animals and Their Ticks in Mediterranean Rim Countries

A total of 148 publications were analyzed. Among them, 66.7% were about bacteria, 21% about parasites, and 12.3% about viruses. Eighty-five pathogens were reported in the Mediterranean Rim, with nine genera of bacteria, eight of parasites, and four of viruses (Table 1). Of these, 51.1% are zoonotic and 48.9% are of non-zoonotic/unknown status (Table 1). The percentage of publications about pathogens detected exclusively in ticks was 38.8%, which was higher than those concerning TBPs detected exclusively in either hosts (27.1%) or in both hosts and ticks (34.1%).

4.1. Parasites

  • Nematoda
  • Cercopithifilaria
Parasites of the genus Cercopithifilaria from the Onchocercidae are tick-borne filarioids that have mainly been described in dogs, with two frequently reported species: Cercopithifilaria bainae and Cercopithifilaria grassi [18]. In the wild animals of the Mediterranean Rim, however, only one species was reported: Cercopithifilaria rugosicauda, a roe deer parasite transmitted by Ixodes ricinus ticks. It was found in the subcutaneous samples from a dead roe deer in Italy [19]. It was only found in this one animal and never detected in ticks collected from wild animals (Table 1). The sparse information on the presence of these parasites can be explained by their low interest and impact on wildlife health. This genus is one of the three least reported in the complete dataset (0.7%) and in the dataset concerning parasites (1%).
  • Apicomplexa
  • Babesia
Babesia is a genus composed of protozoal parasites from the Babesiidae family transmitted by ticks. The zoonotic species are principally transmitted by ticks belonging to the family Ixodidae. The Babesia genus is composed of a number of species detected in wild animals and their ticks in the Mediterranean Rim, but each species was only found in between one and four countries. Among the 13 species found, Babesia microti—a zoonotic species responsible for babesiosis in both humans and animals—was detected in the largest range of countries: Croatia, Italy, Spain, and Turkey. The highest prevalence in ticks was found in Ixodes hexagonus from red foxes in Spain (55.6%), and among wild animals, from red foxes in Italy (54%) [20,21]. The other Babesia species were found in a large panel of hosts including birds, wild ungulates, and rodents; they were mainly found in ticks of the genus Ixodes. Babesia was the parasite genus found the most frequently; it was reported at a level of 10.8% in the complete dataset and 51.6% in the dataset concerning parasites.
  • Cytauxzoon
Parasites from the genus Cytauxzoon are piroplasmids from the family Theileriidae infecting wild and domestic felines, and their ticks are found in both the New and the Old Worlds [145]. In wild animals in the Mediterranean Rim, this genus was only found in lynxes from Spain, with a prevalence of 15%. These pathogens were only identified at the genus level and did not appear to be of particular interest to scientists. It is one of the three genera reported the least in the complete dataset (0.7%) and in the dataset concerning parasites (1%).
  • Hemolivia
This genus belongs to the family Karyolysidae and is composed of haemogragines, which are parasites with a tropism for reptiles as intermediate hosts and hard ticks as final hosts [146]. In wild animals of the Mediterranean Rim, only one species was found: Hemolivia mauritanica. This species is closely related to tortoises, and especially to the genus Tetsudo, where it was found with a prevalence of 17.2% in Palestine (Paperna, 2006). The scarce research on and detection of this genus are probably related to the specific tropism of this genus for reptiles. It is the least reported in the complete dataset (0.7%) and in the dataset concerning parasites (1%).
  • Hepatozoon
The genus Hepatozoon is from the Hepatozoidae family and closely related to the genus Hemolivia [146]. However, it mainly focuses on wild and domestic carnivores. Only two species from wild animals were found in the publications concerning the Mediterranean Rim: Hepatozoon canis, found in foxes in three countries, with the highest prevalence (49%) in Italy, and Hepatozoon kisrae, found in lizards, with a prevalence of 33.3% in Palestine [38,40]. Like the previous genus, Hepatozoon pathogens were found mainly in animal samples. This genus was poorly reported, being mentioned in 2.7% of the complete dataset and 4% of the dataset concerning parasites.
  • Theileria
Like Babesia, the genus Theileria from the family Theileriidae belongs to the piroplasmids group [147]. These parasites have an obligatory period in ticks and infect mammals. They provoke theileriosis (benign to fatal) in breeding animals [148]. Six Theileria species were detected in wild animals. Three species of the six were only found in ticks, one species only in wild animals, and two species in both. Theileria annae was the most frequently detected. Its highest prevalence values were 9.1% in Ixodes ricinus from rodents in Italy and 14% in foxes from [44,45]. This genus was the second most reported parasite genus (8.8%) in the complete dataset and was reported in 13.1% of the dataset concerning parasites.

4.2. Bacteria

  • Anaplasma
The genus Anaplasma is composed of intracellular bacteria from the family Anaplasmataceae, order Rickettsiales. These bacteria (e.g., Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma bovis, and Anaplasma ovis) have a high impact in veterinary healthcare but also in human healthcare (e.g., Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Anaplasma platys) [149,150]. The most frequently reported species in wild animals was Anaplasma phagocytophilum, the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis. This species was detected in six countries (France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Slovenia, and Spain) of the twenty-two in the Mediterranean Rim. Eight tick species were reported to be positive for this pathogen, the highest prevalence being in Ixodes ricinus (11%) collected from red and roe deer in Spain [32]. Throughout the Mediterranean Rim, the main hosts of ticks positive for A. phagocytophilum were wild ungulates (Table 1). In wild animals, A. phagocytophilum was mainly found in rodents, with a prevalence of 22.8% in France. The second most widely distributed species was Anaplasma ovis, found in two countries (Cyprus and Italy), and responsible not only for ovine anaplasmosis in goats and sheep but also in wild ungulates. The highest prevalence was found in Haemaphysalis sulcata, a tick collected from mouflons in Cyprus (24%), and in Ixodes festai collected from hedgehogs in Italy (33.3%). In wild animals, it was only found in mouflons from Cyprus with a prevalence of 10% [70,71]. The genus Anaplasma is widely distributed across the Mediterranean Rim and well researched. It was reported in 19.6% of the complete dataset and 29.3% of the dataset concerning bacteria. It was the second most frequently reported bacteria genus. However, most research focused on the zoonotic species (Anaplasma phagocytophilum) rather than animal-specific species. Nevertheless, an equal amount of research focused on ticks and wild animals.
  • Bartonella
Bartonella are bacteria belonging to the Bartonellaceae family, Rhizobiales order. Nearly half of them have a zoonotic behavior [151]. They can provoke diseases such as trench fever and cat-scratch fever. In the Mediterranean Rim, a total of eight species in this genus were found in three countries: Algeria, Israel, and Italy. The species found only in Algeria was Bartonella tamiae, a zoonotic species primarily found in humans in Thailand. It was reported to have been found in Ixodes vespertilionis ticks collected from bats, with a prevalence of 63.2% [75,152]. The six species detected in Italy were all from ticks (Table 1). The highest prevalence in ticks was for Bartonella bovis from the species Dermacentor marginatus, Haemaphysalis punctata, and Ixodes ricinus collected from fallow deer and red deer [59]. The last species detected was Bartonella elizabethae, which was the only one reported in wild animals, with a prevalence of 25% in rodents in Israel [74]. The research on this genus mainly focused on ticks and involved only a few countries. It was reported in 4.1% of the complete dataset and in 6.1% of the dataset concerning bacteria.
  • Borrelia
The genus Borrelia includes spirochetes bacteria belonging to the family Spirochaetaceae. It is separated into two groups: the Lyme borreliosis group composed of bacteria from the Borrelia burgdoferi sensus lato group, and the relapsing fever group that includes Borrelia miyamotoi [153]. A total of 12 Borrelia species were found in the Mediterranean Rim. Most of them belonged to the Borrelia burgdoferi s.l. group, which is the most widely distributed and responsible for Lyme disease (Table 1). Among these species, Borrelia afzelii was the most frequently reported in four countries: France, Italy, Spain, and Turkey. It was only detected in Ixodes ricinus, with the highest prevalence of 4.8% in ticks collected from birds in Italy. In wild animals, Bo. afzelii was only detected in rodents, with the highest prevalence of 4.5% being found in Spain [11,76]. Among the other Borrelia species, the one with the highest reported prevalence in Ornithodoros erraticus s.l. was Borrelia crocidurae from Morocco (41%) and Borrelia merionesi in rodents from Morocco (4%) [77]. In the Mediterranean Rim, research focused on the Borrelia species of the Lyme disease group, which were found in both ticks and wild animals. This focus is probably linked to their importance for human health. The Borrelia genus was reported in 18.2% of the complete dataset and 27.2% of the dataset concerning bacteria. It was the third most reported bacteria genus.
  • Chlamydia
The genus Chlamydia belong to Chlamydiales, which are bacteria responsible for various diseases in virtually the whole animal realm (Chisu et al., 2018b). Rare studies showed that ticks could be vectors of Chlamydia [154]. Two species were found: Chlamydia abortus and Chlamydia psitacci. The first one—responsible for abortive chlamydiosis in small ruminants—was found only in ticks, the highest prevalence being 21.4% in Haemaphysalis sulcata from hedgehogs in Italy [93,155]. The second one, responsible for avian psittacosis and human pneumonia, was found in animals; the highest prevalence was 11.9% in pigeons from Italy [72,156]. These genera were only found in Italy in both wild animals and ticks, which appears to indicate that ticks may play a role in their circulation. It was reported in only 1.4% of the complete dataset and 2% of the dataset concerning bacteria.
  • Coxiella
This genus belongs to the Coxiellaceae family. Only Coxiella burnetii, responsible for Q fever, is representative of this genus. This TBP infects both animals and humans. The disease can provoke numerous symptoms in humans, unlike in animals, where it is mainly asymptomatic with sporadic cases of abortion and has a worldwide distribution [157]. Coxiella burnetii was detected in the wildlife of five countries. The highest prevalence in ticks and wild animals was observed in Ixodes ricinus collected from rodents in Italy and in red deer from Spain, with prevalence of 17.3% and 48.9%, respectively [86,96] (Table 1). It was reported in a large panel of countries (Algeria, Italy, Italy, Slovenia, and Spain), ticks, and hosts. This shows the importance of C. burnetii in the Mediterranean Rim. It was reported in 9.5% of the complete dataset and in 14.1% of the dataset concerning bacteria.
  • Ehrlichia
Ehrlichia is a genus belonging to the Anaplasmataceae as Anaplasma. It is responsible for human disease such as monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia canis) and animal disease such as canine ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis) [158]. The latter was the only species found in wild animals in the Mediterranean Rim (Israel and Italy). The highest prevalence in ticks was found in Dermacentor marginatus collected from wild boars in Italy (7.8%). The highest prevalence in wild animals was in foxes again from Italy (52%) [100,101] (Table 1). This genus was reported in 4.7% of the complete dataset and 7.1% of the dataset concerning bacteria.
  • Neoehrlichia
As Anaplasma and Ehrlichia, this genus belongs to the family Anaplasmataceae. Of the four bacteria composing this genus, only one was reported in our review: Noehrlichia mikurensis, a zoonotic pathogen that mainly causes chronic lymphocytic leukemia. It is mainly transmitted by the Ixodes genus, and rodents are well-known hosts [159]. It was found in two countries: France, with a prevalence of 1.8% in rodents, and Italy, with a prevalence of 5.3% in Ixodes ricinus collected from rodents [32,104] (Table 1). It was only reported in 1.4% of the complete dataset and 2% of the dataset concerning bacteria.
  • Leptospira
The genus Leptospira represents zoonotic spirochetes responsible for leptospirosis all over the world from the Leptospiraceae family. It is mainly transmitted by contact with a contaminated environment, but can also be detected in ticks [160,161]. A total of four bacteria were reported in our review. Two of them were reported only in Croatia among rodents. Leptospira interrogans and L. borpetersenii were reported in Croatia and France, with the highest prevalence of 30% for Leptospira interrogans in rodents from Croatia [29] (Table 1). Like the previous genus, it was reported in 1.4% of the complete dataset and 2% of the dataset concerning bacteria.
  • Rickettsia
The Rickettsia genus from the family Rickettsiaceae is one of the most important TBPs from an economic and health point of view. It includes many species separated into different groups: the first one is the spotted fever group (SFG), responsible for Mediterranean spotted fever, and the typhus group (TG), which is less well known. [162,163]. Of the 13 Rickettsia species or Candidatus species reported in our review, Rickettsia africae and Rickettsia massiliae were reported in a total of five countries each: Algeria, Greece, Israel, Italy, and Turkey for R. africae, and Algeria, Cyprus, Israel, Italy, and Spain for R. massiliae. The first one, responsible for African tick-bite fever, was found with the highest prevalence of 25% in Hyalomma detritum collected from wild boars in Israel [117]. Rickettsia massiliae is one of the rickettsia responsible for Mediterranean spotted fever and it was frequently detected in ticks from the Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. group on wild boars in Algeria (88.9%) [75]. However, none of these rickettsiae were found in animal samples. The only species found in wild animals was Rickettsia slovaca, an agent of tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA), with a prevalence of 5.4% in wild boars from Algeria and 6% in rodents from Italy [83,129]. This genus was the most frequently detected in the Mediterranean Rim with the highest diversity of species during our research period, and reported most in both the complete dataset (30.4%) and the dataset concerning bacteria (45.5%). This may reflect scientists’ particular concern about this genus. Nevertheless, the genus Rickettsia was reported more often in ticks than in wild animals.

4.3. Viruses

  • Flavivirus
Flaviviruses constitute a major part of arboviruses. They are transmitted by various hematophagous vectors. They mainly target mammals and are responsible for many past outbreaks [164]. Three viruses in this genus were detected in wild animals and their ticks in the Mediterranean Rim: tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), Louping ill virus, and the Maeban virus. The first two are well-known tick-borne viruses responsible for many encephalitis cases in the world. TBEV was detected in wildlife in France and Slovenia, with the highest prevalence of 5.9% in rodents from Slovenia [136]. Like TBEV, the Louping ill virus was only detected in wild animals and only in France, with a prevalence of 0.9% in wild boars and 0.1% in roe deer [132]. Little information is available on the Maeban virus. However, it was detected in seagull eggs in four countries: Algeria, France, Italy, and Spain. The highest prevalence was observed in Spanish seagull eggs (17.5%). In ticks, it was found only in Ornithodoros maritimus again in Spain, with the highest prevalence of 5.9% [133]. The flavivirus genus was the least reported, representing 4.7% of the complete dataset and 38.9% of the dataset concerning viruses.
  • Orthonairovirus
The Orthonairovirus contains a wide range of arboviruses transmit by ticks. One of the most well-known is the Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV), transmitted mainly by the genus Hyalomma. It provokes severe to fatal human disease throughout most of the Old World and its range has been modified with the circulation of the Hyalomma genus due to the climate change [165]. In wild animals living in the Mediterranean Rim, it was reported in five different countries: Algeria, Italy, Morocco, Spain, and Turkey. In animals, the highest prevalence reported was in tortoises from Turkey (9.5%) and the Hyalomma aegyptium tick found on tortoises in Algeria (28.6%) [140,141]. CCHFV was the most reported virus in 5.4% of the complete dataset and 61.1% of the dataset concerning viruses.

5. Ticks Involved in Tick-Borne Diseases among Wild Animals Living in Mediterranean Rim Countries

All the previous pathogens could be transmitted by the 32 species of ticks from eight genera reported to be found on wild animals from the Mediterranean Rim in this review. However, it is important to remember that ticks can also contain endosymbiotic intracellular bacteria, which are harmless and potentially needed for tick survival [166]. In past research, they could have been mistaken for harmful pathogens to humans and wild animals. Furthermore, due to the ticks’ feeding habits, wild animals’ interaction with other groups, and the open environment where they live, it is nearly impossible to confirm that the engorged TBP-positive ticks actually fed and became positive on the wild animals they were collected from.
From the eight tick genera, six belonged to the hard tick group (Ixodidae): Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, Ixodes, and Rhipicephalus. They were widespread in the Mediterranean Rim. Soft ticks (Argasidae) were represented by the last two genera collected in Algeria and Egypt: Argas and Ornithodoros (Table S1). In this section, the TBP-positive engorged tick species reported in the highest number of publications in a considered country was defined as the country’s main tick species.

5.1. Ixodidae

  • Ixodes
Ixodes was the most important genus collected from wild animals in terms of TBPs reported (Table S1). This genus is well-known for its transmission of bacteria responsible for Lyme disease [167]. The ticks are mainly present in the northern part of the Mediterranean Rim and have a ubiquitous tropism with a high impact on both human and animal health [168,169]. In our data, they were reported in eight countries (Cyprus, France, Greece, Italy, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey). Eight species were detected in the Mediterranean Rim: I. acuminatus, I. festai, I. frontalis, I. hexagonus, I. ricinus, I. simplex, I. ventalloi, and I. vespertilionis on a total of 23 hosts. Among the TBPs detected in ticks, 63.9% were detected in these eight tick species. The main species found was I. ricinus, in which 32 TBPs were reported of the 39 reported in the genus (Table S1). It was also the main tick species reported in Italy, France, Slovenia, and Spain in our review (Figure 3). This ubiquitous species is mainly known for its transmission of Borrelia burgdoferi s.l., the causative agents of Lyme disease [167]. However, it can be reported positive for numerous pathogens detected in wild animals. In addition to I. ricinus, two other Ixodes species were defined as main tick species: I. frontalis in Greece and I. ventalloi in Cyprus, despite the few TBPs reported in these species (Table S1, Figure 3). It shows the importance of I. ricinus in the monitoring of TBPs, especially in European countries.
  • Rhipicephalus
The second-ranking genus in terms of pathogen diversity reported to be found on wild animals from Mediterranean Rim countries was Rhipicephalus (Table S1). It is mainly present in Africa and Europe, although Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l. is also present in America and Oceania [170,171]. Like the genus Ixodes, this genus transmits diseases with a global health impact, including anaplasmosis, babesiosis, ehrlichiosis, and rickettsiosis [168,169]. A total of six species—Rh (B). annulatus, Rh. bursa, Rh (B). kohlsi, Rh. ovis, Rh. pusillus, and Rh. sanguineus s.l.—were reported in seven countries (Cyprus, Greece, Israel, Italy, Palestine, Spain, and Turkey). It has been defined as the main tick species in Algeria and Israel (Figure 3). This genus accounted for 36.1% (22 species) of the reported TBPs in ticks. Among them, 18 were detected in Rh. sanguineus s.l. (Table S1). This is a tick species known for its transmission of Ehrlichia canis, Rickettsia conorii, and Babesia canis. It is usually found among domestic animals [168]. Among the other Rhipicephalus species, 14 TBPs were detected in Rh. bursa, which was one of the main tick species in Algeria (Figure 3). This shows the importance of these two species in the monitoring of Rhipicephalus.
  • Haemaphysalis
Haemaphysalis genus members are small ticks that target a wide range of hosts during their immature stage and only mammals during their adult stage [169]. Five species were detected on wild animals from the Mediterranean Rim: H. adleri, H. erinacei, H. parva H. punctata, and H. sulcata in seven countries (Cyprus, Greece, Israel, Italy, Slovenia, Spain, and Turkey). They were collected from 13 wild animals with a total of 34.4% of the TBPs reported from ticks (Table S1). The main Haemaphysalis species reported was H. punctata, which was reported for 11 TBP species of the 21 reported in the genus. It was one of the main tick species in Slovenia (Figure 3). This species is mainly responsible for the distribution of parasites from the genera Babesia and Theileria, but can also be positive for a large panel of bacteria in wild animals [168] (Table S1).
  • Hyalomma
The Hyalomma genus is well known for its transmission of CCHFV. They are large-sized ticks with a tropism for large mammals in the case of adult forms, or for birds and small mammals in the immature stages. This genus is mainly distributed in the southern part of the Mediterranean Rim; their sparse distribution in the northern part is, however, increasing [168,169]. A total of six species (Hy. aegyptum, Hy. anatolicum excavatum, Hy. detritum, Hy. lusitanicum, Hy. marginatum, and Hy. rufipes) were collected from 12 wild animals. This genus was found in the greatest number of countries (Algeria, Cyprus, Greece, France, Israel, Italy, Morocco, Palestine, Spain, and Turkey). It was found positive for 26.2% of the TBPs recorded in ticks. The main Hyalomma species reported for the largest number of TBPs was Hy. marginatum (Table S1). A total of 13 TBPs were found in this particular species of the 16 species found in the genus, and it was defined as a main tick species in Greece and Morocco (Figure 3). Hyalomma marginatum was reported to be found on wildlife in many different countries. It is of importance in the area of healthcare because it can transmit TBPs such as Rickettsia spp., CCHFV, Babesia spp., and Theileria spp. [172]. In combination with the immature stage’s tropism for birds, these characteristics could warrant the importance given to this species in health terms [173]. This confirms the importance of Hy. marginatum in TBP monitoring. However, like the genus Ixodes, particular attention was given to other species such as Hy. aegyptium in Algeria and Palestine, and Hy. rufipes in Greece (Figure 3).
  • Dermacentor
Dermacentor ticks mainly target mammals and are found more or less worldwide. The genus is mainly represented by two species commonly found in the Mediterranean Rim: D. marginatus and D. reticulatus [168]. They transmit a wide range of TBPs, including Rickettsia spp. and piroplasmids, making them important from both a veterinary and human health viewpoint [168]. Dermacentor marginatus on wild animals was found positive for 12 TBPs in five Mediterranean Rim countries (Algeria, France, Italy, Slovenia, and Spain). It was defined as a main tick species in Slovenia (Table S1, Figure 3). All the stages were reported to have been found on ten wildlife species, but it is mainly found on wild ungulates such as wild boars. It is responsible for the circulation of TBPs from the genera Babesia and Rickettsia [174]. Its main tropism for wild ungulates during the adult stage and micromammals and birds for the immature stages could explain the numerous data reported for this species.
  • Amblyomma
Ticks in the genus Amblyomma transmit pathogens responsible for diseases such as Rickettsiosis, and are associated with almost all terrestrial animals. They are mainly reported in tropical and sub-tropical areas [175,176,177]. The genus was poorly represented in the Mediterranean Rim. It was found at the generic level in two countries (Greece and Israel). The Am. marmoreum species was found in Italy on (mainly migratory) birds, and two bacteria genera were detected: Erhlichia spp. (R. aeschlimannii) and Rickettsia spp. (Table S1).

5.2. Argasidae

  • Ornithodoros
Ornithodoros is involved in the transmission of diseases such as CCHF and relapsing fever in the Middle East and Africa [178,179]. In the Mediterranean Rim, it was collected from two wildlife species in three countries (Morocco, Spain, and Tunisia). Three Ornithodoros species were reported (O. erritacus, O. maritimus, and O. normandi) with a prevalence of 8.2% of the TBPs detected in ticks. The tick species with the highest number of TBPs (three) was O. erritacus (Table S1). This could be explained by its main tropism for rodents and micro mammals [168]. However, it was not defined as a main tick species, unlike O. normandi, which was defined as a main tick species in Tunisia (Figure 3).
  • Argas
The genus Argas is reported in the Mediterranean Rim but more especially involved in the circulation of diseases related to birds and bats [169]. It was the least reported tick genus, with only two species mentioned: A. transgariepinus (one TBP reported) and A. vespertilionis (two TBPs reported). It was found only in Italy on bats and involved in the detection of two bacterial genera: Bartonella spp. and Rickettsia spp. Along with the genus Amblyomma (hard ticks), Argas is the least collected genus in the Mediterranean Rim (Table S1).

6. Wild Animal Hosts of TBP-Positive Ticks and Harboring TBPs in Mediterranean Rim Countries

This section focuses on data related to wild animals infected by TBPs and the wild animal hosts of TBP-positive engorged ticks. Nevertheless, the data on the latter do not confirm the ticks’ vector character for the different TBPs.
A total of 17 wild animal groups that hosted both ticks and pathogens were reported in our data. From these wild animals, 61 TBPs were reported as being detected from ticks and 50 TBPs were reported as being detected directly from wild animals (Table S2). The complete list of TBPs reported in our study from TBP-positive engorged ticks on wild animals and from TBP-positive wild animals is shown in Table 2. In this section, the wild animal harboring TBPs reported in the most publications in a considered country was defined as a main TBP host in that country, and the wild animal reported as a host of TBP-positive engorged ticks in the most publications in a considered country was similarly defined as a main host of TBP-positive engorged ticks in that country. The main groups reported positive for TBPs were rodents, in which 46% of the TBPs in wild animals were reported; they were therefore defined as main TBP hosts in Croatia, France, Italy, Israel, and Morocco. This group was followed by roe deer (20%) and red foxes (16%), both defined as main TBP hosts in Turkey. Next came wild boars (14%), defined as a main TBP host in Algeria and Turkey, then wild carnivores (14%). Red deer (10%) were defined as a main host in Spain, Turkey, and Slovenia, while birds (10%) were defined as a main host in Cyprus and Turkey. Those found to have the lowest percentage of TBPs were mouflons (6%, defined as a main host in Cyprus), chamois (6%), hares (4%, defined as a main host in Turkey), lizards (4%, defined as a main host in Palestine), tortoises (4%, defined as a main host in Palestine and Turkey), swamp deer (4%), fallow deer (2%), and porcupines (2%) (Table S2).
The main wild animal groups reported to have the highest diversity of TBPs in TBP-positive ticks were small wild animals such as rodents (36.1%) and birds (34.4%), followed by game mammals such as wild boars (27.9% of TBPs), red deer (26.2%), and roe deer (22.9%) (Table 3). The amount of data found on rodents and birds can be explained by their role as hosts of immature ticks and the potential role of migratory birds in tick dissemination [12,180]. The game mammal hosts are well-known game animals that can also interact with livestock. These interactions—combined with the accessibility of samples due to their game status—may explain the scientific interest in these wild animals [181,182]. They were followed by red foxes (21.3%) and wild carnivores such as badgers, genets, golden jackals, lynxes, martens, mongooses, otters, and wolves (13.1%). Concerning wolves, data were sporadically obtained from animal captures for veterinary purposes or from samples taken directly from the corpse after natural or accidental death. The remaining wild ungulates reported were composed of species such as mouflons (18%), fallow deer (16.4%), and chamois (3.3%), which are also game mammals and probably the focus of research for the same reason as red deer and wild boars, though they are of less scientific interest. The final group of wild animal hosts comprises the hosts of immature ticks, which include lizards (14.8%), hedgehogs (9.9%), tortoises (9.9%), hares (8.2%), and bats (6.6%) (Table 2). They are also hosts of specific tick species such as Hy. aegyptium on tortoises. Some wild animals were hosts to ticks with a high percentage of TBPs, and birds were defined as the main host for TBP-positive engorged ticks in many (five) countries. This could be explained by the scientific interest in the role of birds in the tick’s life cycle and their dissemination of TBPs [12,173].

7. Biogeography, Diversity, and Distribution in the Mediterranean Rim

The distribution of publications throughout Mediterranean Rim countries is shown in Figure 4A. This gives a total of 148 publications in 22 countries, with a mean number of seven articles per country. We can note a variability in these data depending on their geographical situation. The number of publications can vary from 0 to 54 according to the country. Most of the articles included in our review concern Italy (54), Spain (25), and France (23). The remaining publications originated from the other countries of the Mediterranean Rim, with the exception of seven countries where no publications were included in our dataset (Albania, Egypt, Lebanon, Libya, Malta, Montenegro, and Syria). However, if it seems to show that the most important research efforts are in Italy, France, and Spain, this is not necessarily true. Along with the country, the financial support, the political situation, the accessibility to the wild animal host due to their protection status, and local research habits could also impact the performance of research efforts in certain countries.

7.1. Overall Analysis of the Four Areas of the Mediterranean Rim

For the purposes of this review, we divided the Mediterranean Rim countries into four areas: Western Europe, which includes France, Italy, Malta, Monaco, and Spain (68.8% of the publications); the Balkans, composed of Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia, Greece, Montenegro, and Slovenia (8.8% of the publications); the Middle East, composed of Cyprus, Israel, Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, and Turkey (15.5% of the publications); and North Africa, which includes Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia (6.8% of the publications) (Figure 4A).
  • Western Europe
In this review, Western Europe was divided into five countries: France, Italy, Malta, Monaco, and Spain. Publications about pathogens in wild animals were only found in France, Italy, and Spain. These countries represented the highest amount of research in the Mediterranean Rim, having produced 102 papers, corresponding to 68.9% of all the publications included. Among the 17 animal hosts reported in this review, 16 were found in Western Europe. Of these, five were often included in the publications of this area: red deer (32%), wild boars (27%), rodents (26%), birds (25%), and roe deer (17%) (Figure 4B). A total of 31 tick species were found on these 16 hosts in Western Europe, which corresponds to 97% of the total number of tick species found in our review of Mediterranean Rim countries. The seven tick genera reported in this area include Ixodes, a ubiquitous tick genus, followed by the genera Hyalomma and Dermacentor, both targeting ungulates [168,169]. The high prevalence of Ixodes spp. in Western Europe compared to the other three areas is due to its range, which is mainly in Europe [104]. The high prevalence of Hyalomma could be due to the recent expansion of this genus from other areas [16,108]. The immature stages of these three genera can be found on animal hosts such as rodents and birds [110,180]. The other tick genera reported were Argas spp., Amblyomma spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Orniyhodoros spp., and Rhipicephalus spp. Among the TBPs reported from these wild animals and their ticks, the three most frequently found pathogens were A. phagocytophilum—the causative agent of human granulocytic anaplasmosis (HGA)—which was found in more than 30% of the publications in Western Europe, and bacteria from the genus Rickettsia, including R. slovaca, a bacterium from the spotted fever group (SFG) found in 14% of the publications, R. helvetica, reported in 13% of the publications, and C. burnetti, also found in 13% of the publications (Figure 4C). In Western Europe, the data reported were mainly from research focusing on game animals such as wild ungulates (red deer and wild boars) and their ticks. They also focused on animal hosts of immature ticks (rodents).
  • Middle East
The Middle East is the second most important area in terms of publications, with 23 publications on wild animals (15.5% of the total amount of publications included). These publications reported 12 animal hosts, which corresponds to 70.5% of the animal hosts found in the Mediterranean Rim. Of all these animal hosts, five were found more frequently. These were tortoises, birds, rodents, red deer, and wild boars, reported in 29.2%, 16.7%, 16%, 16%, and 12.5% of publications from the Middle East, respectively (Figure 4B). Twenty-nine tick species from six genera were reported to have been collected from these animal hosts, representing 90.6% of the ticks found in the Mediterranean Rim. The main genera reported were Hyalomma spp., followed by Rhipicephalus spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Ixodes spp., Dermacentor spp., and Argas spp. Thirty-nine pathogens were detected in wild animals and their ticks (51.3% of the total number of pathogens). Of these, the most reported in terms of the percentage of publications from this area were Rickettsia spp., a genus responsible for diseases such as spotted fever and TIBOLA (20.8%) [162]; CCHFV, mainly transmitted by Hyalomma ticks (16.7%); R. massiliae, an SFG bacterium (12.5%) (Figure 4C); and R. aeschlimannii, and C. burnetiid, both reported in 8.3% of the area’s publications. Unlike Western Europe, the scientific focus appeared to be not only on game mammals—although red deer were often the subject of research, other wild animal hosts involved in the tick’s life cycle and dispersion were also investigated, such as birds and tortoises [110].
  • The Balkans
A total of 13 publications were included in the Balkan area, representing 8.8% of all the publications (Figure 4A). Eight animal hosts were reported to be infected in these papers. The main five wild animals reported were red deer, rodents, wild boars, roe deer, and birds, mentioned in 26.7%, 26.7%, 13.3%, 13.3%, and 6.7% of the area’s publications, respectively (Figure 4B). A total of 16 tick species from six genera were reported from these hosts (51.6% of the total tick species found). The main genera reported was Hyalomma spp., followed by Rhipicephalus spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Ixodes spp., Argas spp., and Ornithodoros spp. A total of 16 pathogens were found in wild animals and their ticks in the Balkans, which represents 21.1% of the total pathogens found in this review. The five main pathogens found were A. phagocytophilum, found in 20% of the publications; the genus Babesia, found in 20% of the publications; TBEV, found in 7.5% of the publications; and the genera Leptospira and Rickettsia, which were both reported in 13.3% of the area’s publications (Figure 4C). Like Western Europe, the scientific focus was on game animals such as red deer and wild boars, in addition to micro mammals.
  • North Africa
The Mediterranean Rim area with the fewest number of publications found was North Africa, with ten publications. This area represents 6.8% of all the publications from the Mediterranean Rim (Figure 4A). A total of six wild animal hosts were reported in these studies, which represents about 35.3% of all the hosts found. The main wildlife hosts in this area were tortoises and hedgehogs, which were both reported in 30% of the papers from North Africa. Birds, rodents, and wild boars were each reported in 20% of the papers in North Africa (Figure 4B). Eighteen tick species from eight tick genera found on these six hosts were reported as TBP-positive (about 58% of the tick species reported in this review). Of these, the main species reported was also Hyalomma spp., followed by Rhipicephalus spp., Ixodes spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Argas spp., Amblyomma spp., Dermacentor spp., and Ornithodoros spp. Eleven pathogens were reported from these ticks and animal hosts. This represents 14.5% of the total pathogens found in the review. The most frequently found in North Africa were R. aeschlimannii, an SFG rickettsia found in 30% of the publications in North Africa; Borrelia spp.; CCHFV; and R. massiliae and R. slovaca, each of which was reported in 20% of the publications (Figure 4C). North Africa has the fewest number of publications in the Mediterranean Rim, with a main focus on hosts of immature ticks such as birds and hedgehogs, though there is a secondary focus on hosts of the Hyalomma tick, such as tortoises.

7.2. Insular Tick-Borne Pathogens in Wild Animals and Their Ticks

Due to their geographic situation, the Mediterranean islands are of importance in terms of animal migrations, human activities, and pathogen circulation. A total of 19 papers were published from these islands, representing 12.8% of the publications selected during this review. These 19 publications were included in the complete dataset. From 19 papers, most were from some of the largest islands in the Mediterranean Rim: Sardinia, Corsica, Cyprus, and smaller Greek islands. We decided to split the islands according to their geographic location between the western and eastern parts of the Mediterranean Sea. The western islands include Asinara, Capris, Columbretes, Corsica, Isla Grossa, Majorca, Medes, Pianosa, Ponza, Sardinia, Sicily, Ustica, Ventotene, and Zanone (16 of the publications), while the eastern islands include Antikythira and Cyprus (four of the publications) (Table 3). One publication was reported from both western and eastern islands.
A total of 11 wild animal hosts were reported to carry TBP-positive ticks or be infected directly by TBPs: birds, hares, hedgehogs, foxes, mouflons, porcupines, red deer, rodents, tortoises, wild boars, and wild carnivores (Table 3). However, most of the data were reported in publications about TBPs in TBP-positive ticks collected from these wild animals (89.5% of the island publications). In the western islands, 10 of the 11 wild animals were reported: birds, hedgehogs, mouflons, porcupines, red deer, red foxes, rodents, tortoises, wild boars, and wild carnivores. Of this number, most of the data (62.5%) in the western island publications were about birds. They were closely followed by wild boars, which were reported in 50% of the publications, then mouflons in 31.3%. The last two main wild animals reported were red deer and wild carnivores, both reported in 18.8% of the western island publications (Figure 4D). Meanwhile, fewer wild animals (four) were reported in the eastern island publications: birds and mouflons were both reported in 50% of them, and hares and red foxes in 25% of them (Figure 4D).
Concerning TBP-positive ticks, of the eight genera reported in the complete dataset, seven were reported in the island dataset: Amblyomma spp., Dermacentor spp., Haemaphysalis spp., Hyalomma spp., Ixodes spp., Ornithodoros spp., and Rhipicephalus spp. (Table 3). The seven genera were reported in the western island dataset. The main TBP-positive tick genus reported was Hyalomma spp. in 64.3% of publications, followed by the genera Rhipicephalus and Ixodes, reported in 57.1% and 50% of the publications on ticks, respectively. This is probably due to the range of Hyalomma spp. and their spread northward within the Mediterranean Rim [16,173]. This genus may thus contribute to the extension of TBP circulation, particularly on the islands, which can play a sentinel role [108]. Indeed, birds are the main wild animal hosts of Hyalomma’s immature stage on the islands. The last two main genera were Dermacentor and Haemaphysalis, both reported in 35.7% of the TBP-positive tick publications from the western islands (Figure 4D). As for the wild animal hosts, fewer positive tick genera were reported in the eastern island dataset (five): Haemaphysalis, Hyalomma, and Rhipicephalus were found in 100% of the publications on TBP-positive ticks, followed by Ixodes spp. and Amblyomma spp. reported in 66.7% and 33.3% of the eastern island publications concerning TBP-positive ticks, respectively (Figure 4D). The pattern of the main TBP-positive tick genera reported in the island dataset followed the same pattern as the complete dataset, with the exception of Western Europe.
Of all the TBPs reported, 36.8% of them were identified in the TBP-positive wild animals and their TBP-positive ticks on the islands (Table 3). Even though a small percentage of the complete dataset was reported in the island publications, a relatively high percentage of the TBPs was reported. On the western islands, a total of 11 genera were reported: Anaplasma spp., Babesia spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia spp., CCHFV, Chlamydia spp., Coxiella spp., Ehrlichia spp., Maebian virus, Rickettsia spp., and Theileria spp. Of these, the main genus reported was Rickettsia spp. in 68.8% of the publications from the western islands, followed by CCHFV and the genera Anaplasma, Ehrlichia, and Coxiella reported in 12.5%, 18.8%, 12.5%, and 6.3% of the western island publications, respectively (Figure 4D). Fewer TBPs (three) were reported in the eastern island publications: Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma spp., and Coxiella spp. were reported in 100%, 50%, and 50% of these publications, respectively (Figure 4D).

8. Conclusions

A total of 148 publications reported TBPs in wild animals and their ticks. Of these, 68.9% were reported in Western Europe, 15.5% in the Middle East, 8.8% in the Balkans, and 6.8% in North Africa. This shows that Western Europe’s scientific research mainly focuses on TBPs in wild animals within Western Europe compared to the other areas investigated. Additionally, most of the research was performed in four countries: France, Italy, Spain, and Turkey; most of the Mediterranean Rim remains unexplored. These publications reported 85 pathogens, with nine genera for bacteria, eight for parasites, and four for viruses, revealing the marked diversity of TBPs and the importance of the research on TBPs in wild animal populations. The main TBP-positive genus reported was Ixodes spp., detected positive for more than 60% of the TBPs. However, this was the main TBP-positive genus reported in Western Europe alone. The importance of this genus in the complete dataset could be due to the greater number of publications from Western Europe. In the other areas and on the Mediterranean islands, the main TBP-positive tick genus was Hyalomma spp. The numerous data found on Hyalomma ticks could be explained by both the amount of data reported on their wild animal hosts, such as wild ungulates and birds, and the recent expansion of this genus repartition area, which led to the expansion of the reparation area of the TBPs this genus carries. The 17 wild animal hosts reported in the complete dataset included a large diversity of wild animal groups, namely wild ungulates such as red deer and wild boar, which host adult ticks, and micro-vertebrates such as birds and rodents, which host immature ticks. The amount of data about birds on the islands (63.2% of island publications) could be due to the potential importance of migration paths in the dissemination of ticks and TBPs there. This shows the importance of wildlife in the circulation of tick-borne pathogens. The main deficiency of this review of tick-borne pathogens in wild animals and their tick species is that the Mediterranean islands only provided 12.8% of the total publications, even though 36.8% of the pathogens and nearly 64.7% of the wild animal hosts and tick species were found there.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10091858/s1, Table S1: TBP-positive engorged ticks collected from wild animals and their distribution in the Mediterranean Rim; Table S2: TBPs detected in wild animal and their ticks in the Mediterranean Rim.

Author Contributions

B.D., S.M., V.P. and Y.Q. conceived the scientific ideas. B.D., S.M., V.P. and Y.Q. performed and discussed the work and edited the manuscript. All the authors reviewed the manuscript and provided critical feedback. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research work of B.D., Y.Q., and V.P. was supported by UMR 6134, University of Corsica, and the CNRS. B.D. was awarded a grant from the Corsican Regional Council. This study was supported by funding from the French Government and from the Corsican Regional Council (CPER project), and also by the GERHYCO interdisciplinary project dedicated to water management, ecology, and hydro-ecosystem services in an insular context. S.M.’s research was supported by the French Agency for Food, Environmental, and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES). UMR BIPAR is supported by the French Government’s Investissement d’Avenir program, Laboratoire d’Excellence “Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases” (grant no. ANR-10LABEX-62-IBEID).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material. Raw data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. CDC. Zoonotic Diseases | One Health | CDC. Published 19 February 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/basics/zoonotic-diseases.html (accessed on 11 February 2021).
  2. Rosenberg, R.; Ben Beard, C. Vector-borne Infections. Emerg. Infect Dis. 2011, 17, 769–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO. Vector-Borne Diseases. Published 2 March 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vector-borne-diseases (accessed on 10 February 2021).
  4. Sonenshine, D. The Biology of Ticks; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nicholson, W.L.; Sonenshine, D.E.; Noden, B.H.; Brown, R.N. Chapter 27—Ticks (Ixodida). In Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 3rd ed.; Mullen, G.R., Durden, L.A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 603–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parola, P.; Raoult, D. Ticks and tickborne bacterial diseases in humans: An emerging infectious threat. Clin. Infect Dis. 2001, 32, 897–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Beati, L.; Klompen, H. Phylogeography of Ticks (Acari: Ixodida). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2019, 64, 379–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Inci, A.; Yildirim, A.; Duzlu, O.; Doganay, M.; Aksoy, S. Tick-Borne Diseases in Turkey: A Review Based on One Health Perspective. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0005021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mendoza-Roldan, J.A.; Colella, V.; Lia, R.P.; Nguyen, V.L.; Barros-Battesti, D.M.; Iatta, R.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Otranto, D. Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato) in ectoparasites and reptiles in southern Italy. Parasit Vectors 2019, 12, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Klaus, C.; Gethmann, J.; Hoffmann, B.; Ziegler, U.; Heller, M.; Beer, M. Tick infestation in birds and prevalence of pathogens in ticks collected from different places in Germany. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 2729–2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pajoro, M.; Pistone, D.; Varotto Boccazzi, I.; Mereghetti, V.; Bandi, C.; Fabbi, M.; Scattorin, F.; Sassera, D.; Montagna, M. Molecular screening for bacterial pathogens in ticks (Ixodes ricinus) collected on migratory birds captured in northern Italy. Folia Parasitol. 2018, 65, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Georgopoulou, I.; Tsiouris, V. The potential role of migratory birds in the transmission of zoonoses. Vet. Ital. 2008, 44, 671–677. [Google Scholar]
  13. Giannakopoulos, C.; Bindi, M.; Moriondo, M.; LeSager, P.; Tin, T. Climate Change Impacts in the Mediterranean Resulting from a 2 °C Global Temperature Rise; WWF: Gland, Switzerland, 2005; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  14. European Commission. Impact of Human Pressures on the Mediterranean Sea’s Ecosystem | News | CORDIS | European Commission. Published 29 May 2017. Available online: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/122339-impact-of-human-pressures-on-the-mediterranean-seas-ecosystem (accessed on 14 June 2021).
  15. Al-Abri, S.S.; Abaidani, I.A.; Fazlalipour, M.; Mostafavi, E.; Leblebicioglu, H.; Pshenichnaya, N.; Memish, Z.A.; Hewson, R.; Petersen, E.; Mala, P.; et al. Current status of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in the World Health Organization Eastern Mediterranean Region: Issues, challenges, and future directions. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 58, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Estrada-Peña, A. Ticks as vectors: Taxonomy, biology and ecology. Rev.—Int. Epizoot. 2015, 34, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A.; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Angelou, A.; Latrofa, M.S.; Annoscia, G.; Symeonidou, I.; Theodoridis, A.; Polizopoulou, Z.S.; Otranto, D.; Papadopoulos, E. Cercopithifilaria species in dogs and ticks from Greece. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3391–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ramos, R.A.N.; Giannelli, A.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Mallia, E.; Passantino, G.; Lia, R.P.; Latrofa, M.S.; Mutafchiev, Y.; Otranto, D. Cercopithifilaria rugosicauda (Spirurida, Onchocercidae) in a roe deer and ticks from southern Italy. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2013, 2, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Checa, R.; López-Beceiro, A.M.; Montoya, A.; Barrera, J.P.; Ortega, N.; Gálvez, R.; Marino, V.; González, J.; Olmeda, Á.S.; Fidalgo, L.E.; et al. Babesia microti-like piroplasm (syn. Babesia vulpes) infection in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in NW Spain (Galicia) and its relationship with Ixodes hexagonus. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 252, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Da Rold, G.; Ravagnan, S.; Soppelsa, F.; Porcellato, E.; Soppelsa, M.; Obber, F.; Citterio, C.V.; Carlin, S.; Danesi, P.; Montarsi, F.; et al. Ticks are more suitable than red foxes for monitoring zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in northeastern Italy. Parasit Vectors 2018, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bonnet, S.; Jouglin, M.; L’Hostis, M.; Chauvin, A. Babesia sp. EU1 from Roe Deer and Transmission within Ixodes ricinus. Emerg Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 1208–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De la Fuente, J.; Naranjo, V.; Ruiz-Fons, F.; Vicente, J.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Almazán, C.; Kocan, K.M.; Martín, M.P.; Gortázar, C. Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in ixodid ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from European wild boar (Sus scrofa) and Iberian red deer (Cervus elaphus hispanicus) in central Spain. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2004, 50, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iori, A.; Gabrielli, S.; Calderini, P.; Moretti, A.; Pietrobelli, M.; Tampieri, M.P.; Galuppi, R.; Cancrini, G. Tick reservoirs for piroplasms in central and northern Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 170, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Orkun, Ö.; Karaer, Z. Molecular characterization of Babesia species in wild animals and their ticks in Turkey. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 55, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Remesar, S.; Díaz, P.; Prieto, A.; Markina, F.; Díaz Cao, J.M.; López-Lorenzo, G.; Fernández, G.; López, C.M.; Panadero, R.; Díez-Baños, P.; et al. Prevalence and distribution of Babesia and Theileria species in roe deer from Spain. Int J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 9, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rocchigiani, G.; Ebani, V.V.; Nardoni, S.; Bertelloni, F.; Bascherini, A.; Leoni, A.; Mancianti, F.; Poli, A. Molecular survey on the occurrence of arthropod-borne pathogens in wild brown hares (Lepus europaeus) from Central Italy. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 59, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Santoro, M.; Auriemma, C.; Lucibelli, M.G.; Borriello, G.; D’Alessio, N.; Sgroi, G.; Veneziano, V.; Galiero, G.; Fusc, G. Molecular Detection of Babesia spp. (Apicomplexa: Piroplasma) in Free-Ranging Canids and Mustelids From Southern Italy. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tadin, A.; Turk, N.; Korva, M.; Margaletić, J.; Beck, R.; Vucelja, M.; Habuš, J.; Svoboda, P.; Zupanc, T.A.; Henttonen, H.; et al. Multiple co-infections of rodents with hantaviruses, Leptospira, and Babesia in Croatia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zanet, S.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Bottero, E.; de Mera, I.G.F.; Gortazar, C.; Carpignano, M.G.; Ferroglio, E. Piroplasmosis in wildlife: Babesia and Theileria affecting free-ranging ungulates and carnivores in the Italian Alps. Parasit. Vectors. 2014, 7, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Beck, A.; Huber, D.; Polkinghorne, A.; Kurilj, A.G.; Benko, V.; Mrljak, V.; Reljić, S.; Kusak, J.; Reil, I.; Beck, R. The prevalence and impact of Babesia canis and Theileria sp. in free-ranging grey wolf (Canis lupus) populations in Croatia. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baráková, I.; Derdáková, M.; Selyemová, D.; Chvostáč, M.; Špitalská, E.; Rosso, F.; Collini, M.; Rosà, R.; Tagliapietra, V.; Girardi, M.; et al. Tick-borne pathogens and their reservoir hosts in northern Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ebani, V.V.; Rocchigiani, G.; Bertelloni, F.; Nardoni, S.; Leoni, A.; Nicoloso, S.; Mancianti, F. Molecular survey on the presence of zoonotic arthropod-borne pathogens in wild red deer (Cervus elaphus). Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 47, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beck, R.; Vojta, L.; Curković, S.; Mrljak, V.; Margaletić, J.; Habrun, B. Molecular survey of Babesia microti in wild rodents in central Croatia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Usluca, S.; Celebi, B.; Karasartova, D.; Gureser, A.S.; Matur, F.; Oktem, M.A.; Sozen, M.; Karatas, A.; Babur, C.; Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; et al. Molecular Survey of Babesia microti (Aconoidasida: Piroplasmida) in Wild Rodents in Turkey. J. Med. Entomol. 2019, 56, 1605–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Millán, J.; Naranjo, V.; Rodríguez, A.; Lastra, J.M.P.D.L.; Mangold, A.J.; Fuente, J.D.L. Prevalence of infection and 18S rRNA gene sequences of Cytauxzoon species in Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) in Spain. Parasitology 2007, 134, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Paperna, I. Hemolivia mauritanica (Haemogregarinidae: Apicomplexa) infection in the tortoise Testudo graeca in the Near East with data on sporogonous development in the tick vector Hyalomna aegyptium. Parasite 2006, 13, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Paperna, I.; Kremer-Mecabell, T.; Finkelman, S. Hepatozoon kisrae n. sp. infecting the lizard Agama stellio is transmitted by the tick Hyalomma cf. aegyptium. Parasite 2002, 9, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dežđek, D.; Vojta, L.; Ćurković, S.; Lipej, Z.; Mihaljević, Ž.; Cvetnić, Ž.; Beck, R. Molecular detection of Theileria annae and Hepatozoon canis in foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in Croatia. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 172, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ebani, V.V.; Rocchigiani, G.; Nardoni, S.; Bertelloni, F.; Vasta, V.; Papini, R.A.; Verin, R.; Poli, A.; Mancianti, F. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Central Italy. Acta Trop. 2017, 172, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fishman, Z.; Gonen, L.; Harrus, S.; Strauss-Ayali, D.; King, R.; Baneth, G. A serosurvey of Hepatozoon canis and Ehrlichia canis antibodies in wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) from Israel. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 119, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Galuppi, R.; Aureli, S.; Bonoli, C.; Caffara, M.; Tampieri, M.P. Detection and molecular characterization of Theileria sp. in fallow deer (Dama dama) and ticks from an Italian natural preserve. Res. Vet. Sci. 2011, 91, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. García-Sanmartín, J.; Aurtenetxe, O.; Barral, M.; Marco, I.; Lavin, S.; García-Pérez, A.L.; Hurtado, A. Molecular detection and characterization of piroplasms infecting cervids and chamois in Northern Spain. Parasitology 2007, 134, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Giménez Pardo, C.; Casado, N.; Criado-Fornelio, A.; Miguel, F.; Dominguez-Peñafiel, G. A molecular survey of Piroplasmida and Hepatozoon isolated from domestic and wild animals in Burgos (Northern Spain). Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 162, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lledó, L.; Giménez-Pardo, C.; Domínguez-Peñafiel, G.; Sousa, R.; Gegúndez, M.I.; Casado, N.; Criado, A. Molecular Detection of Hemoprotozoa and Rickettsia Species in Arthropods Collected from Wild Animals in the Burgos Province, Spain. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010, 10, 735–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chisu, V.; Alberti, A.; Zobba, R.; Foxi, C.; Masala, G. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of Babesia and Theileria spp. in ticks from domestic and wild hosts in Sardinia. Acta Trop. 2019, 196, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Borgni, E.; Rizzo, F.; Ballardini, M.; Mignone, W.; Renna, G.; Buonincontro, G.; Maglione, D.; Ercolini, C.; Ferrari, A.; Mandola, M.L. Ticks from wild mammals: Evidence of zoonotic pathogens in Liguria region, North-West Italy. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 79, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Boucheikhchoukh, M.; Laroche, M.; Aouadi, A.; Dib, L.; Ahmed, B.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P. MALDI-TOF MS identification of ticks of domestic and wild animals in Algeria and molecular detection of associated microorganisms. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018, 57, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ioannou, I.; Chochlakis, D.; Kasinis, N.; Anayiotos, P.; Lyssandrou, A.; Papadopoulos, B.; Tselentis, Y.; Psaroulaki, A. Carriage of Rickettsia spp., Coxiella burnetii and Anaplasma spp. by endemic and migratory wild birds and their ectoparasites in Cyprus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jouglin, M.; Blanc, B.; de la Cotte, N.; Bastian, S.; Ortiz, K.; Malandrin, L. First detection and molecular identification of the zoonotic Anaplasma capra in deer in France. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Baráková, I.; Derdáková, M.; Carpi, G.; Rosso, F.; Collini, M.; Tagliapietra, V.; Ramponi, C.; Hauffe, H.C.; Rizzoli, A. Genetic and Ecologic Variability among Anaplasma phagocytophilum Strains, Northern Italy. Emerg Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1082–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Beninati, T.; Piccolo, G.; Rizzoli, A.; Genchi, C.; Bandi, C. Anaplasmataceae in wild rodents and roe deer from Trento Province (northern Italy). Eur J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2006, 25, 677–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Carpi, G.; Bertolotti, L.; Pecchioli, E.; Cagnacci, F.; Rizzoli, A. Anaplasma phagocytophilum groEL gene heterogeneity in Ixodes ricinus larvae feeding on roe deer in Northeastern Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009, 9, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chastagner, A.; Moinet, M.; Perez, G.; Roy, E.; McCoy, K.D.; Plantard, O.; Agoulon, A.; Bastian, S.; Butet, A.; Rantier, Y.; et al. Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in small rodents in France. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 988–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dugat, T.; Zanella, G.; Véran, L.; Lesage, C.; Girault, G.; Durand, B.; Lagrée, A.-C.; Boulouis, H.-J.; Haddad, N. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis potentially reveals the existence of two groups of Anaplasma phagocytophilum circulating in cattle in France with different wild reservoirs. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ebani, V.; Cerri, D.; Fratini, F.; Ampola, M.; Andreani, E. Seroprevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in domestic and wild animals from central Italy. New Microbiol. 2008, 31, 371–375. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ebani, V.; Cerri, D.; Fratini, F.; Ampola, M.; Andreani, E. Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in a fallow deer (Dama dama) population in a preserve of central Italy. New Microbiol. 2007, 30, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Ebani, V.V.; Bertelloni, F.; Mani, P. Serological evidence of exposure to zoonotic tick-borne bacteria in pheasants (Phasianus colchicus). Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. AAEM. 2017, 24, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ebani, V.V.; Bertelloni, F.; Turchi, B.; Filogari, D.; Cerri, D. Molecular survey of tick-borne pathogens in Ixodid ticks collected from hunted wild animals in Tuscany, Italy. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2015, 8, 714–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Hoffman, T.; Wilhelmsson, P.; Barboutis, C.; Fransson, T.; Jaenson, T.G.T.; Lindgren, P.-E.; Von Loewenich, F.D.; Lundkvist, Å.; Olsen, B.; Salaneck, E. A divergent Anaplasma phagocytophilum variant in an Ixodes tick from a migratory bird; Mediterranean basin. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2020, 10, 1729653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jouglin, M.; Chagneau, S.; Faille, F.; Helene, V.; Bastian, S.; Malandrin, L. Detecting and characterizing mixed infections with genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) by developing an ankA cluster-specific nested PCR. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Keysary, A.; Massung, R.F.; Inbar, M.; Wallach, A.D.; Shanas, U.; Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; Waner, T. Molecular Evidence for Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Israel. Emerg Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 1411–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Palomar, A.M.; Santibáñez, P.; Mazuelas, D.; Roncero, L.; Santibáñez, S.; Portillo, A.; Oteo, J.A. Role of Birds in Dispersal of Etiologic Agents of Tick-borne Zoonoses, Spain, 2009. Emerg Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 1188–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Perez, G.; Bastian, S.; Chastagner, A.; Agoulon, A.; Plantard, O.; Vourc’h, G.; Butet, A. Ecological factors influencing small mammal infection by Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in agricultural and forest landscapes. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 4205–4219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Petrovec, M.; Bidovec, A.; Sumner, J.W.; Nicholson, W.L.; Childs, J.E.; Avsic-Zupanc, T. Infection with Anaplasma phagocytophila in cervids from Slovenia: Evidence of two genotypic lineages. Wien. Klin Wochenschr. 2002, 114, 641–647. [Google Scholar]
  66. Remesar, S.; Díaz, P.; Prieto, A.; García-Dios, D.; Fernández, G.; López, C.M.; Panadero, R.; Díez-Baños, P.; Morrondo, P. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) from Spain. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rosso, F.; Tagliapietra, V.; Baráková, I.; Derdáková, M.; Konečný, A.; Hauffe, H.C.; Rizzoli, A. Prevalence and genetic variability of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in wild rodents from the Italian alps. Parasit. Vectors. 2017, 10, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Smrdel, K.S.; Bidovec, A.; Malovrh, T.; Petrovec, M.; Duh, D.; Zupanc, T.A. Detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in wild boar in Slovenia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 50–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Torina, A.; Alongi, A.; Naranjo, V.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Vicente, J.; Scimeca, S.; Marino, A.M.F.; Salina, F.; Caracappa, S.; de la Fuente, J. Prevalence and Genotypes of Anaplasma Species and Habitat Suitability for Ticks in a Mediterranean Ecosystem. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7578–7584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chisu, V.; Foxi, C.; Mannu, R.; Satta, G.; Masala, G. A five-year survey of tick species and identification of tick-borne bacteria in Sardinia, Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 678–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ioannou, I.; Sandalakis, V.; Kassinis, N.; Chochlakis, D.; Papadopoulos, B.; Loukaides, F.; Tselentis, Y.; Psaroulaki, A. TICK-BORNE BACTERIA IN MOUFLONS AND THEIR ECTOPARASITES IN CYPRUS. J. Wildl Dis. 2011, 47, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ebani, V.V.; Bertelloni, F.; Mani, P. Molecular survey on zoonotic tick-borne bacteria and chlamydiae in feral pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2016, 9, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hornok, S.; Szőke, K.; Meli, M.L.; Sándor, A.D.; Görföl, T.; Estók, P.; Wang, Y.; Tu, V.T.; Kováts, D.; Boldogh, S.A.; et al. Molecular detection of vector-borne bacteria in bat ticks (Acari: Ixodidae, Argasidae) from eight countries of the Old and New Worlds. Parasit. Vectors 2019, 12, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Morick, D.; Baneth, G.; Avidor, B.; Kosoy, M.Y.; Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; Mintz, D.; Eyal, O.; Goethe, R.; Mietze, A.; Shpigel, N.; et al. Detection of Bartonella spp. in wild rodents in Israel using HRM real-time PCR. Vet. Microbiol. 2009, 139, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Leulmi, H.; Aouadi, A.; Bitam, I.; Bessas, A.; Benakhla, A.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P. Detection of Bartonella tamiae, Coxiella burnetii and rickettsiae in arthropods and tissues from wild and domestic animals in northeastern Algeria. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Barandika, J.F.; Hurtado, A.; García-Esteban, C.; Gil, H.; Escudero, R.; Barral, M.; Jado, I.; Juste, R.A.; Anda, P.; García-Pérez, A.L. Tick-Borne Zoonotic Bacteria in Wild and Domestic Small Mammals in Northern Spain. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6166–6171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Diatta, G.; Souidi, Y.; Granjon, L.; Arnathau, C.; Durand, P.; Chauvancy, G.; Mané, Y.; Sarih, M.; Belghyti, D.; Renaud, F.; et al. Epidemiology of tick-borne borreliosis in Morocco. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Güner, E.S.; Hashimoto, N.; Kadosaka, T.; Imai, Y.; Masuzawa, T. A novel, fast-growing Borrelia sp. isolated from the hard tick Hyalomma aegyptium in Turkey. Microbiology 2003, 149, 2539–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Gil, H.; Barral, M.; Escudero, R.; García-Pérez, A.L.; Anda, P. Identification of a new Borrelia species among small mammals in areas of northern Spain where Lyme disease is endemic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 1336–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Güner, E.S.; Watanabe, M.; Kadosaka, T.; Polat, E.; Gargili, A.; Gulanber, A.; Ohashi, N.; Kaneda, K.; Imai, Y.; Masuzawa, T. Seroepidemiology of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in wild mice captured in northern Turkey. Epidemiol. Infect. 2005, 133, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Marchant, A.; Le Coupanec, A.; Joly, C.; Perthame, E.; Sertour, N.; Garnier, M.; Godard, V.; Ferquel, E.; Choumet, V. Infection of Ixodes ricinus by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in peri-urban forests of France. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Marsot, M.; Chapuis, J.-L.; Gasqui, P.; Dozières, A.; Masséglia, S.; Pisanu, B.; Ferquel, E.; Vourc’h, G. Introduced Siberian Chipmunks (Tamias sibiricus barberi) Contribute More to Lyme Borreliosis Risk than Native Reservoir Rodents. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Martello, E.; Mannelli, A.; Grego, E.; Ceballos, L.A.; Ragagli, C.; Stella, M.C.; Tomassone, L. Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and spotted fever group rickettsiae in small rodents and attached ticks in the Northern Apennines, Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2019, 10, 862–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tomassone, L.; Ceballos, L.A.; Ragagli, C.; Martello, E.; De Sousa, R.; Stella, M.C.; Mannelli, A. Importance of Common Wall Lizards in the Transmission Dynamics of Tick-Borne Pathogens in the Northern Apennine Mountains, Italy. Microb. Ecol. 2017, 74, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ebani, V.; Bertelloni, F.; Cecconi, G.; Sgorbini, M.; Cerri, D. Zoonotic tick-borne bacteria among wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Central Italy. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2017, 7, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pascucci, I.; Di Domenico, M.; Dall’Acqua, F.; Sozio, G.; Cammà, C. Detection of Lyme Disease and Q Fever Agents in Wild Rodents in Central Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2015, 15, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pato, F.; Panadero-Fontán, R.; López Sández, C.; Fernández, P.; Vázquez, E.; Díez Baños, P.; Morrondo, P.; Fernández, G. Seroprevalence of borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in roe deer (Capreolus Capreolus) from Northwestern Spain. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2013, 44, 660–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Pascucci, I.; Cammà, C. Lyme disease and the detection of Borrelia burgdorferi genospecies in Ixodes ricinus ticks from central Italy. Vet. Ital. 2010, 46, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Pisanu, B.; Chapuis, J.L.; Dozières, A.; Basset, F.; Poux, V.; Vourc’h, G. High prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in the European red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris in France. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Amore, G.; Tomassone, L.; Grego, E.; Ragagli, C.; Bertolotti, L.; Nebbia, P.; Rosati, S.; Mannelli, A. I > Borrelia lusitaniae in Immature Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) Feeding on Common Wall Lizards in Tuscany, Central Italy. J. Med. Entomol. 2007, 44, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mori, E.; Pisanu, B.; Zozzoli, R.; Solano, E.; Olivieri, E.; Sassera, D.; Montagna, M. Arthropods and associated pathogens from native and introduced rodents in Northeastern Italy. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 3237–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tomassone, L.; Grego, E.; Auricchio, D.; Iori, A.; Giannini, F.; Rambozzi, L. Lyme borreliosis spirochetes and spotted fever group rickettsiae in ixodid ticks from Pianosa island, Tuscany Archipelago, Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2013, 13, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chisu, V.; Foxi, C.; Tanda, A.; Masala, G. Molecular evidence of Chlamydiales in ticks from wild and domestic hosts in Sardinia, Italy. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 981–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Astobiza, I.; Barral, M.; Ruiz-Fons, F.; Barandika, J.F.; Gerrikagoitia, X.; Hurtado, A.; García-Pérez, A.L. Molecular investigation of the occurrence of Coxiella burnetii in wildlife and ticks in an endemic area. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 147, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ebani, V.V.; Nardoni, S.; Giani, M.; Rocchigiani, G.; Archin, T.; Altomonte, I.; Poli, A.; Mancianti, F. Molecular survey on the occurrence of avian haemosporidia, Coxiella burnetii and Francisella tularensis in waterfowl from central Italy. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 10, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. González-Barrio, D.; Hagen, F.; Tilburg, J.J.H.C.; Ruiz-Fons, F. Coxiella burnetii Genotypes in Iberian Wildlife. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 72, 890–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Knap, N.; Žele, D.; Glinšek Biškup, U.; Avšič-Županc, T.; Vengušt, G. The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in ticks and animals in Slovenia. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Toma, L.; Mancini, F.; Di Luca, M.; Cecere, J.G.; Bianchi, R.; Khoury, C.; Quarchioni, E.; Manzia, F.; Rezza, G.; Ciervo, A. Detection of microbial agents in ticks collected from migratory birds in central Italy. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2014, 14, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Santoro, M.; D’Alessio, N.; Cerrone, A.; Lucibelli, M.G.; Borriello, G.; Aloise, G.; Auriemma, C.; Riccone, N.; Galiero, G. The Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) as a potential host for rickettsial pathogens in southern Italy. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Santoro, M.; Veneziano, V.; D’Alessio, N.; Di Prisco, F.; Lucibelli, M.G.; Borriello, G.; Cerrone, A.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Latrofa, M.S.; Otranto, D.; et al. Molecular survey of Ehrlichia canis and Coxiella burnetii infections in wild mammals of southern Italy. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 4427–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Satta, G.; Chisu, V.; Cabras, P.; Fois, F.; Masala, G. Pathogens and symbionts in ticks: A survey on tick species distribution and presence of tick-transmitted micro-organisms in Sardinia, Italy. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60 Pt 1, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Izquierdo-Rodríguez, E.; Fernández-Álvarez, Á.; Martín-Carrillo, N.; Marchand, B.; Feliu, C.; Miquel, J.; Foronda, P.; Quilichini, Y. Pathogenic Leptospira species in rodents from Corsica (France). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0233776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Turk, N.; Milas, Z.; Margaletic, J.; Staresina, V.; Slavica, A.; Riquelme-Sertour, N.; Bellenger, E.; Baranton, G.; Postic, D. Molecular characterization of Leptospira spp. strains isolated from small rodents in Croatia. Epidemiol. Infect. 2003, 130, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Vayssier-Taussat, M.; Le Rhun, D.; Buffet, J.-P.; Maaoui, N.; Galan, M.; Guivier, E.; Charbonnel, N.; Cosson, J.-F. Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis in Bank Voles, France. Emerg Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 2063–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kar, S.; Yılmazer, N.; Midilli, K.; Ergin, S.; Alp, H.; Gargili, A.; Namık; Üniversitesi, K.; Bölümü, B. Presence of the Zoonotic Borrelia burgdorferi sl. and Rickettsia spp. in the Ticks from Wild Tortoises and Hedgehogs. Musbed 2011, 11, 2011–2166. [Google Scholar]
  106. Maioli, G.; Pistone, D.; Bonilauri, P.; Pajoro, M.; Barbieri, I.; Patrizia, M.; Vicari, N.; Dottori, M. Ethiological agents of rickettsiosis and anaplasmosis in ticks collected in Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) during 2008 and 2009. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2012, 57, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Oteo, J.A.; Portillo, A.; Santibáñez, S.; Pérez-Martínez, L.; Blanco, J.R.; Jiménez, S.; Ibarra, V.; Pérez-Palacios, A.; Sanz, M. Prevalence of spotted fever group Rickettsia species detected in ticks in La Rioja, Spain. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1078, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wallménius, K.; Barboutis, C.; Fransson, T.; Jaenson, T.G.; Lindgren, P.-E.; Nyström, F.; Olsen, B.; Salaneck, E.; Nilsson, K. Spotted fever Rickettsia species in Hyalomma and Ixodes ticks infesting migratory birds in the European Mediterranean area. Parasit. Vectors 2014, 7, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Azagi, T.; Klement, E.; Perlman, G.; Lustig, Y.; Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; Apanaskevich, D.A.; Gottlieb, Y. Francisella-Like Endosymbionts and Rickettsia Species in Local and Imported Hyalomma Ticks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e01302-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Battisti, E.; Urach, K.; Hodžić, A.; Fusani, L.; Hufnagl, P.; Felsberger, G.; Ferroglio, E.; Duscher, G.G. Zoonotic Pathogens in Ticks from Migratory Birds, Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020, 26, 2986–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bitam, I.; Kernif, T.; Harrat, Z.; Parola, P.; Raoult, D. First detection of Rickettsia aeschlimannii in Hyalomma aegyptium from Algeria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 253–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cicculli, V.; Maestrini, O.; Casabianca, F.; Villechenaud, N.; Charrel, R.; de Lamballerie, X.; Falchi, A. Molecular Detection of Spotted-Fever Group Rickettsiae in Ticks Collected from Domestic and Wild Animals in Corsica, France. Pathogens 2019, 8, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Keysary, A.; Eremeeva, M.E.; Leitner, M.; Din, A.B.; Wikswo, M.E.; Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; Inbar, M.; Wallach, A.D.; Shanas, U.; King, R.; et al. Spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks collected from wild animals in Israel. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 919–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Matsumoto, K.; Parola, P.; Brouqui, P.; Raoult, D. Rickettsia aeschlimannii in Hyalomma ticks from Corsica. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004, 23, 732–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Scarpulla, M.; Barlozzari, G.; Marcario, A.; Salvato, L.; Blanda, V.; De Liberato, C.; D’Agostini, C.; Torina, A.; Macrì, G. Molecular detection and characterization of spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks from Central Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 1052–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Orkun, Ö.; Karaer, Z.; Çakmak, A.; Nalbantoğlu, S. Spotted fever group rickettsiae in ticks in Turkey. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Waner, T.; Keysary, A.; Eremeeva, M.E.; Din, A.B.; Mumcuoglu, K.Y.; King, R.; Atiya-Nasagi, Y. Rickettsia africae and Candidatus Rickettsia barbariae in Ticks in Israel. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 90, 920–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Márquez, F.J. Spotted fever group Rickettsia in ticks from southeastern Spain natural parks. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2008, 45, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Márquez, F.J.; Millán, J. Rickettsiae in ticks from wild and domestic carnivores of Doñana National Park (Spain) and surrounding area. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15 (Suppl. S2), 224–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Chisu, V.; Leulmi, H.; Masala, G.; Piredda, M.; Foxi, C.; Parola, P. Detection of Rickettsia hoogstraalii, Rickettsia helvetica, Rickettsia massiliae, Rickettsia slovaca and Rickettsia aeschlimannii in ticks from Sardinia, Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2017, 8, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Chochlakis, D.; Ioannou, I.; Sandalakis, V.; Dimitriou, T.; Kassinis, N.; Papadopoulos, B.; Tselentis, Y.; Psaroulaki, A. Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae in Ticks in Cyprus. Microb Ecol. 2012, 63, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bitam, I.; Parola, P.; Matsumoto, K.; Rolain, J.M.; Baziz, B.; Boubidi, S.C.; Harrat, Z.; Belkaid, M.; Raoult, D. First Molecular Detection of R. conorii, R. aeschlimannii, and R. massiliae in Ticks from Algeria. Ann. N. Y. Acad Sci. 2006, 1078, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Selmi, M.; Martello, E.; Bertolotti, L.; Bisanzio, D.; Tomassone, L. Rickettsia slovaca and Rickettsia raoultii in Dermacentor marginatus ticks collected on wild boars in Tuscany, Italy. J. Med. Entomol. 2009, 46, 1490–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chisu, V.; Masala, G.; Foxi, C.; Socolovschi, C.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P. Rickettsia conorii israelensis in Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks, Sardinia, Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 446–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Martello, E.; Selmi, M.; Ragagli, C.; Ambrogi, C.; Stella, M.C.; Mannelli, A.; Tomassone, L. Rickettsia slovaca in immature Dermacentor marginatus and tissues from Apodemus spp. in the northern Apennines, Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2013, 4, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Masala, G.; Chisu, V.; Satta, G.; Socolovschi, C.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P. Rickettsia slovaca from Dermacentor marginatus ticks in Sardinia, Italy. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2012, 3, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ortuño, A.; Quesada, M.; López, S.; Miret, J.; Cardeñosa, N.; Castellà, J.; Anton, E.; Segura, F. Prevalence of Rickettsia slovaca in Dermacentor marginatus Ticks Removed from Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Northeastern Spain. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1078, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Raele, D.A.; Galante, D.; Pugliese, N.; Salandra, G.L.; Cafiero, M.A. Spotted fever group rickettsiae associated with ixodid ticks in wild environment in Southern Italy. Microbiologyopen 2018, 7, e00527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Zeroual, F.; Leulmi, H.; Bitam, I.; Benakhla, A. Molecular evidence of Rickettsia slovaca in spleen of wild boars in northeastern Algeria. New Microbes New Infect. 2018, 24, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ereqat, S.; Nasereddin, A.; Al-Jawabreh, A.; Azmi, K.; Harrus, S.; Mumcuoglu, K.; Apanaskevich, D.; Abdeen, Z. Molecular Detection and Identification of Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae in Ticks Collected from the West Bank, Palestinian Territories. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Buysse, M.; Duron, O. Two novel Rickettsia species of soft ticks in North Africa: “Candidatus Rickettsia africaseptentrionalis” and “Candidatus Rickettsia mauretanica. ” Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2020, 11, 101376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Bournez, L.; Umhang, G.; Faure, E.; Boucher, J.-M.; Boué, F.; Jourdain, E.; Sarasa, M.; Llorente, F.; Jiménez-Clavero, M.A.; Moutailler, S.; et al. Exposure of Wild Ungulates to the Usutu and Tick-Borne Encephalitis Viruses in France in 2009-2014: Evidence of Undetected Flavivirus Circulation a Decade Ago. Viruses 2019, 12, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Arnal, A.; Gómez-Díaz, E.; Cerdà-Cuéllar, M.; Lecollinet, S.; Pearce-Duvet, J.; Busquets, N.; García-Bocanegra, I.; Pagès, N.; Vittecoq, M.; Hammouda, A.; et al. Circulation of a Meaban-Like Virus in Yellow-Legged Gulls and Seabird Ticks in the Western Mediterranean Basin. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bournez, L.; Umhang, G.; Moinet, M.; Boucher, J.-M.; Demerson, J.-M.; Caillot, C.; Legras, L.; Devillers, E.; Hansmann, Y.; Velay, A.; et al. Disappearance of TBEV Circulation among Rodents in a Natural Focus in Alsace, Eastern France. Pathogens 2020, 9, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Bournez, L.; Umhang, G.; Moinet, M.; Richomme, C.; Demerson, J.-M.; Caillot, C.; Devillers, E.; Boucher, J.-M.; Hansmann, Y.; Boué, F.; et al. Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus: Seasonal and Annual Variation of Epidemiological Parameters Related to Nymph-to-Larva Transmission and Exposure of Small Mammals. Pathogens 2020, 9, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Knap, N.; Korva, M.; Dolinšek, V.; Sekirnik, M.; Trilar, T.; Avšič-Županc, T. Patterns of tick-borne encephalitis virus infection in rodents in Slovenia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Brinkmann, A.; Dinçer, E.; Polat, C.; Hekimoğlu, O.; Hacioglu, S.; Földes, K.; Özkul, A.; Öktem, I.M.A.; Nitsche, A.; Ergünay, K. A metagenomic survey identifies Tamdy orthonairovirus as well as divergent phlebo-, rhabdo-, chu- and flavi-like viruses in Anatolia, Turkey. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 1173–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Cajimat, M.N.B.; Rodriguez, S.E.; Schuster, I.U.E.; Swetnam, D.M.; Ksiazek, T.G.; Habela, M.A.; Negredo, A.I.; Estrada-Peña, A.; Barrett, A.D.; Bente, D.A. Genomic Characterization of Crimean–Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in Hyalomma Tick from Spain, 2014. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017, 17, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Estrada-Peña, A.; Palomar, A.M.; Santibáñez, P.; Sánchez, N.; Habela, M.A.; Portillo, A.; Romero, L.; Oteo, J.A. Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in Ticks, Southwestern Europe, 2010. Emerg Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 179–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Kar, S.; Rodriguez, S.E.; Akyildiz, G.; Cajimat, M.N.B.; Bircan, R.; Mears, M.C.; Bente, D.A.; Keles, A.G. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus in tortoises and Hyalomma aegyptium ticks in East Thrace, Turkey: Potential of a cryptic transmission cycle. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kautman, M.; Tiar, G.; Papa, A.; Široký, P. AP92-like Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in Hyalomma aegyptium Ticks, Algeria. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 354–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Leblebicioglu, H.; Eroglu, C.; Erciyas-Yavuz, K.; Hokelek, M.; Acici, M.; Yilmaz, H. Role of migratory birds in spreading Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Turkey. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1331–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Mancuso, E.; Toma, L.; Polci, A.; D’Alessio, S.G.; Di Luca, M.; Orsini, M.; Di Domenico, M.; Marcacci, M.; Mancini, G.; Spina, F.; et al. Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Genome in Tick from Migratory Bird, Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1418–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Negredo, A.; Habela, M.Á.; de Arellano, E.R.; Diez, F.; Al, A.N.E.; López, P.; Sarriá, A.; Labiod, N.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Arenas, M.; et al. Survey of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Enzootic Focus, Spain, 2011-2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1177–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Panait, L.C.; Mihalca, A.D.; Modrý, D.; Juránková, J.; Ionică, A.M.; Deak, G.; Gherman, C.M.; Heddergott, M.; Hodžić, A.; Veronesi, F.; et al. Three new species of Cytauxzoon in European wild felids. Vet. Parasitol. 2021, 290, 109344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kvičerová, J.; Hypša, V.; Dvořáková, N.; Mikulíček, P.; Jadzik, D.; Gardner, M.G.; Javanbakht, H.; Tiar, G.; Široký, P. Hemolivia and Hepatozoon: Haemogregarines with Tangled Evolutionary Relationships. Protist 2014, 165, 688–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Florin-Christensen, M.; Schnittger, L. Piroplasmids and ticks: A long-lasting intimate relationship. Front. Biosci Landmark Ed. 2009, 14, 3064–3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Mans, B.J.; Pienaar, R.; Latif, A.A. A review of Theileria diagnostics and epidemiology. Int J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2015, 4, 104–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Ben Said, M.; Belkahia, H.; Messadi, L. Anaplasma spp. in North Africa: A review on molecular epidemiology, associated risk factors and genetic characteristics. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Kocan K m De La Fuente, J.; Cabezas-Cruz, A. The genus Anaplasma: New challenges after reclassification. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2015, 34, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Pérez-Martínez, L.; Venzal, J.M.; González-Acuña, D.; Portillo, A.; Blanco, J.R.; Oteo, J.A. Bartonella rochalimae and Other Bartonella spp. in Fleas, Chile. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1150–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Kosoy, M.; Morway, C.; Sheff, K.W.; Bai, Y.; Colborn, J.; Chalcraft, L.; Dowell, S.F.; Peruski, L.F.; Maloney, S.A.; Baggett, H.; et al. Bartonella tamiae sp. nov., a Newly Recognized Pathogen Isolated from Three Human Patients from Thailand. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 772–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Margos, G.; Gofton, A.; Wibberg, D.; Dangel, A.; Marosevic, D.; Loh, S.-M.; Oskam, C.; Fingerle, V. The genus Borrelia reloaded. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. McKercher, D.G.; Wada, E.M.; Ault, S.K.; Theis, J.H. Preliminary studies on transmission of Chlamydia to cattle by ticks (Ornithodoros coriaceus). Am. J. Vet. Res. 1980, 41, 922–924. [Google Scholar]
  155. Arif, E.D.; Saeed, N.M.; Rachid, S.K. Isolation and Identification of Chlamydia abortus from Aborted Ewes in Sulaimani Province, Northern Iraq. Polish J. Microbiol. 2020, 69, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Knittler, M.R.; Sachse, K. Chlamydia psittaci: Update on an underestimated zoonotic agent. Pathog. Dis. 2015, 73, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Angelakis, E.; Raoult, D. Q fever. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 140, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Ismail, N.; Bloch, K.C.; McBride, J.W. Human Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis. Clin. Lab. Med. 2010, 30, 261–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Portillo, A.; Santibáñez, P.; Palomar, A.M.; Santibáñez, S.; Oteo, J.A. ‘Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis’ in Europe. New Microbes New Infect. 2018, 22, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Levett, P.N. Leptospirosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 296–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Wójcik-Fatla, A.; Zając, V.; Cisak, E.; Sroka, J.; Sawczyn, A.; Dutkiewicz, J. Leptospirosis as a tick-borne disease? Detection of Leptospira spp. in Ixodes ricinus ticks in eastern Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2012, 19, 656–659. [Google Scholar]
  162. Abdad, M.Y.; Abou Abdallah, R.; Fournier, P.E.; Stenos, J.; Vasoo, S. A Concise Review of the Epidemiology and Diagnostics of Rickettsioses: Rickettsia and Orientia spp. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e01728-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tomassone, L.; Berriatua, E.; De Sousa, R.; Duscher, G.G.; Mihalca, A.; Silaghi, C.; Sprong, H.; Zintl, A. Neglected vector-borne zoonoses in Europe: Into the wild. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 251, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Holbrook, M.R. Historical Perspectives on Flavivirus Research. Viruses 2017, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Portillo, A.; Palomar, A.M.; Santibáñez, P.; Oteo, J.A. Epidemiological Aspects of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever in Western Europe: What about the Future? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ahantarig, A.; Trinachartvanit, W.; Baimai, V.; Grubhoffer, L. Hard ticks and their bacterial endosymbionts (or would be pathogens). Folia Microbiol. 2013, 58, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chomel, B. Lyme disease. Rev. Sci. et Tech. de l’OIE 2015, 34, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Estrada-Peña, A. Ticks of Domestic Animals in the Mediterranean Region: A Guide to Identification of Species; University of Zaragoza: Zaragoza, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  169. Pérez-Eid, C. Les Tiques: Identification, Biologie, Importance Médicale et Vétérinaire; Lavoisier: Cachan, France, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  170. Dantas-Torres, F. The brown dog tick, Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) (Acari: Ixodidae), From taxonomy to control. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 152, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Walker, J.B.; Keirans, J.E.; Horak, I.G. The Genus Rhipicephalus (Acari, Ixodidae), A Guide to the Brown Ticks of the World; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  172. Kumar, B.; Manjunathachar, H.V.; Ghosh, S. A review on Hyalomma species infestations on human and animals and progress on management strategies. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Capek, M.; Literak, I.; Kocianova, E.; Sychra, O.; Najer, T.; Trnka, A.; Kverek, P. Ticks of the Hyalomma marginatum complex transported by migratory birds into Central Europe. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Selmi, M.; Ballardini, M.; Salvato, L.; Ricci, E. Rickettsia spp. in Dermacentor marginatus ticks: Analysis of the host-vector-pathogen interactions in a northern Mediterranean area. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2017, 72, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Chi-Yen, S.; Sauer, J.R.; Eikenbary, P.; Hair, J.A.; Frick, J.H. The effects of desiccation and rehydration on the lone star tick. J. Insect Physiol. 1973, 19, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Eldin, C.; Mediannikov, O.; Davoust, B.; Cabre, O.; Barré, N.; Raoult, D.; Parola, P. Emergence of Rickettsia africae, Oceania. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 100–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kennedy, A.C.; Marshall, E. Lone Star Ticks (Amblyomma americanum). Del. J. Public Health. 2021, 7, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Galindo, I.; Alonso, C. African Swine Fever Virus: A Review. Viruses. 2017, 9, E103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Moradi-Asl, E.; Jafari, S. The habitat suitability model for the potential distribution of Ornithodoros tholozani (Laboulbène et Mégnin, 1882) and Ornithodoros lahorensis (Neumann, 1908) (Acari: Argasidae), the main vectors of tick-borne relapsing fever in Iran. Ann. Parasitol. 2020, 66, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Slowik, T.J.; Lane, R.S. Feeding preferences of the immature stages of three western north American ixodid ticks (Acari) for avian, reptilian, or rodent hosts. J. Med. Entomol. 2009, 46, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Barasona, J.A.; Latham, M.C.; Acevedo, P.; Armenteros, J.A.; Latham, A.D.M.; Gortazar, C.; Carro, F.; Soriguer, R.C.; Vicente, J. Spatiotemporal interactions between wild boar and cattle: Implications for cross-species disease transmission. Vet. Res. 2014, 45, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Cowie, C.E.; Hutchings, M.R.; Barasona, J.A.; Gortázar, C.; Vicente, J.; White, P.C.L. Interactions between four species in a complex wildlife: Livestock disease community: Implications for Mycobacterium bovis maintenance and transmission. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2016, 62, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. De Liberato, C.; Frontoso, R.; Magliano, A.; Montemaggiori, A.; Autorino, G.L.; Sala, M.; Bosworth, A.; Scicluna, M.T. Monitoring for the possible introduction of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in Italy based on tick sampling on migratory birds and serological survey of sheep flocks. Prev. Vet. Med. 2018, 149, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Methodology diagram for the bibliographic research in keeping with the PRISMA 2009 flow chart according to Moher et al., 2015.
Figure 1. Methodology diagram for the bibliographic research in keeping with the PRISMA 2009 flow chart according to Moher et al., 2015.
Microorganisms 10 01858 g001
Figure 2. Number of publications through the years (2000–February 2021). The total number is indicated in red, and the other colored lines indicate the number of publications according to each detection method used (serology, microscopy, or molecular biology).
Figure 2. Number of publications through the years (2000–February 2021). The total number is indicated in red, and the other colored lines indicate the number of publications according to each detection method used (serology, microscopy, or molecular biology).
Microorganisms 10 01858 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of main TBP-positive engorged tick species in Mediterranean Rim countries (n = number of TBP-positive engorged tick species by country).
Figure 3. Distribution of main TBP-positive engorged tick species in Mediterranean Rim countries (n = number of TBP-positive engorged tick species by country).
Microorganisms 10 01858 g003
Figure 4. (A) Map of publications per country and Mediterranean area (n = number of publications), (B) of the main wild animal hosts, (C) of the main TBPs in the four Mediterranean Rim areas, (D) and main wild animal hosts, genera of TBP-positive ticks, and TBPs on the western and eastern Mediterranean islands.
Figure 4. (A) Map of publications per country and Mediterranean area (n = number of publications), (B) of the main wild animal hosts, (C) of the main TBPs in the four Mediterranean Rim areas, (D) and main wild animal hosts, genera of TBP-positive ticks, and TBPs on the western and eastern Mediterranean islands.
Microorganisms 10 01858 g004
Table 1. Tick-borne pathogens reported in wild animals or engorged ticks found on wild animals in Mediterranean Rim countries.
Table 1. Tick-borne pathogens reported in wild animals or engorged ticks found on wild animals in Mediterranean Rim countries.
PathogenTBP-Positive Engorged Ticks Collected
from Hosts
Hosts of TBP-Positive TicksTBP-Positive HostsCountryReference
Parasites: Nematoda
Cercopithifilaria
Cercopithifilaria rugosicaudaNo data foundNo data foundRoe deerItaly[19]
Parasites: Apicomplexa
Babesia
Babesia spp.Dermacentor marginatus, Hyalomma spp., Hyalomma marginatum, Ixodes ricinus, and Rhipicephalus bursaDeer, roe deer, and wild boarsDeer, badgers, hares, roe deer, rodents, and wolvesCroatia, France, Italy, and Spain[22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]
Babesia annaeNo data foundNo data foundRed foxesItaly[21]
Babesia bigeminaNo data foundNo data foundRed deer, roe deer, and wild boarsItaly and Spain[26,30]
Babesia canisNo data foundNo data foundWolvesCroatia[31]
Babesia capreoliIxodes ricinusBirdsChamois, red deer, and roe deerItaly and Spain[26,30,32]
Babesia crassaHaemaphysalis parvaWild boarsNo data foundTurkey[25]
Babesia divergensNo data foundNo data foundRed deerItaly[33]
Babesia microtiIxodes hexagonus and Ixodes ricinusRed foxes, rodents, and roe deerRed foxes and rodentsCroatia, Italy, and Turkey[20,21,32,34,35]
Babesia occultansHyalomma marginatumWild boarsNo data foundTurkey[25]
Babesia ovisIxodes ricinusRoe deerNo data foundItaly[24]
Babesia rodainiIxodes ricinus and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Roe deer and wild boarsNo data foundItaly[24]
Babesia rossiHaemaphysalis parvaWild boarsNo data foundTurkey[25]
Babesia venatorumIxodes ricinusBirds and rodentsRoe deerItaly and Spain[26,30,32]
Babesia vulpesNo data foundNo data foundRed foxesItaly and Turkey[21,25,28]
Cytauxzoon
Cytauxzoon spp.No data foundNo data foundLynxesSpain[36]
Hemolivia
Hemolivia mauritanicaNo data foundNo data foundTortoisesPalestine[37]
Hepatozoon
Hepatozoon spp.No data foundNo data foundLizardsPalestine[38]
Hepatozoon canisNo data foundNo data foundRed foxesCroatia, Israel, and Italy[39,40,41]
Hepatozoon kisraeNo data foundNo data foundLizardsPalestine[38]
Theileria
Theileria spp.Dermacentor marginatus, Hyalomma marginatum, Ixodes ricinus, and Rhipicephalus bursaFallow deer, red deer, and wild boarChamois, hares, fallow deer, red deer, roe deer, and wild boarsItaly and Spain[23,26,27,30,42,43]
Theileria annaeIxodes hexagonus and Ixodes ricinusRed foxes and rodentsBadgers and red foxesCroatia, Italy, and Spain[21,30,39,40,44,45]
Theileria buffeliHyalomma marginatum, Rhipicpehalus bursa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Birds, red foxes, and mouflonsNo data foundItaly[46]
Theileria capreoli WolvesCroatia[31]
Theileria orientalisHyalomma marginatum, Rhipicephalus bursa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Birds, red foxes, and mouflonsNo data foundItaly[46]
Theileria ovisRhipicephalus ovisMouflonsChamoisItaly and Spain[43]
Theileria sergentiHyalomma marginatum, Rhipicephalus bursa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Birds, red foxes, and mouflonsNo data foundItaly[46]
Bacteria
Anaplasma
Anaplasma spp.Haemaphysalis punctata, Ixodes ricinus, Rhipicephalus bursa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Chamois and hedgehogsBirdsAlgeria, Cyprus, and Italy[47,48,49]
Anaplasma capraNo data foundNo data foundRed deer and swamp deerFrance[50]
Anaplasma marginaleDermacentor marginatus, Hyalomma marginatum, Ixodes ricinus, and Rhipicephalus bursaRed deer and wild boar Italy[23]
Anaplasma phagocytophilumBoophilus kohlsi, Dermacentor marginatus, Haemaphysalis punctata, Hyalomma marginatum, Ixodes ricinus, Rhipicephalus bursa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Bird, fallow deer, red deer, roe deer, rodent, and wild boarFallow deer, porcupines, red foxes, roe deer, rodents, swamp deer, and wild boarsFrance, Greece, Israel, Italy, Slovenia, and Spain[21,23,32,33,40,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]
Anaplasma ovisHaemaphysalis punctata, Haemaphysalis sulcata, Ixodes festai, Rhipicephalus bursa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Hedgehog, marten, mouflon, and red foxMouflonsCyprus and Italy[70,71]
Bartonella
Bartonella spp.Argas vespertilionis, Ixodes vespertilionis, Ixodes simplex,, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Bats, red foxBirds and rodentsIsrael and Italy[70,72,73,74]
Bartonella acomodisIxodes ricinusRed deerNo data foundItaly[59]
Bartonella bacilliformisHaemaphysalis punctata and Ixodes ricinusFallow deer and red deerNo data foundItaly[59]
Bartonella bovisDermacentor marginatus, Haemaphysalis punctata, and Ixodes ricinusFallow deer and red deerNo data foundItaly[59]
Bartonella chomeliiDermacentor marginatus and Ixodes ricinusRed deer and roe deerNo data foundItaly[59]
Bartonella elizabethaeNo data foundNo data foundRodentIsrael[74]
Bartonella tamiaeIxodes vespertilionisBatsNo data foundAlgeria[75]
Bartonella tribocorumIxodes ricinusRed deerNo data foundItaly[59]
Bartonella vinsonnii berkoffiiIxodes ricinusRed deerNo data foundItaly[59]
Borrelia
Borrelia spp.Hyalomma aegyptiumTortoisesRodentsAlgeria, Morocco, Spain, and Turkey[48,76,77,78]
Borrelia afzeliiIxodes ricinusBirds, lizards, and rodentsRodentsFrance, Italy, Spain, and Turkey[11,76,79,80,81,82,83,84]
Borrelia bavariensisNo data foundNo data foundRodentsFrance[81]
Borrelia burgdoferi s.l.Dermacentor marginatus, Ixodes acuminatus, Ixodes ricinus, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Fallow deer, lizards, red deer, rodents, and roe deerBirds, rodents, roe deer, and wild boarsFrance, Italy, and Spain[33,58,59,64,72,76,81,83,84,85,86,87]
Borrelia burgdoferi s.s.Ixodes acuminatus and Ixodes ricinusRodents and roe deerRodentsFrance, Italy, and Spain[79,81,82,83,88,89]
Borrelia crociduraeOrnithodoros erritacusRodentsNo data foundMorocco[77]
Borrelia gariniiHaemaphysalis punctata, Ixodes spp., Ixodes frontalis, and Ixodes ricinusBirds, lizards, and rodentsRodentsFrance, Italy, and Spain[11,63,79,82,83,84]
Borrelia hispanicaOrnithodoros erritacusRodentsNo data foundMorocco[77]
Borrelia lusitaniaeIxodes ricinusBird, lizards, rodents, and roe deerRodentsItaly[9,11,83,84,88,90,91]
Borrelia merionesiOrnithodoros erritacusRodentsRodentsMorocco[77]
Borrelia spielmaniiIxodes acuminatusBirdsNo data foundItaly[92]
Borrelia valaisianaIxodes spp., Ixodes ricinus, and Ixodes ventalloiBirds, lizards, and rodentsRodentsItaly and Spain[11,63,79,83,84,90,92]
Borrelia turdiIxodes frontalisBirdsNo data foundSpain[63]
Chlamydia
Chlamydia spp.No data foundNo data foundBirdsItaly[72]
Chlamydia abortusHaemaphysalis sulcata, Rhipicephalus bursa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Hedgehog, marten, mouflon, red deer, and red foxNo data foundItaly[93]
Chlamydia psitacciNo data foundNo data foundBirdItaly[72]
Coxiella
Coxiella burnetiiHaemaphysalis punctata, Haemaphysalis sulcata, Hyalomma anatolicum excavatum, Ixodes spp., Ixodes acuminatus, Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes ventalloi, Ixodes vespertilionis Rhipicaphalus bursa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Bat, bird, hare, marten, mouflon, roe deer, rodent, and wild boarBird, mouflon, red deer, red fox, and rodentAlgeria, Cyprus Italy, Slovenia, and Spain[33,40,49,58,70,71,72,75,76,86,94,95,96,97]
Ehrlichia
Ehrlichia spp.Am. marmoreum, Dermacentor marginatus, Hyalomma spp., Hyalomma marginatus, Hyalomma rufipes, and Rhipicephalus bursaBird, red deer, and wild boar Spain[23,98]
Ehrlichia canisDermacentor marginatus, Haemaphysalis punctata, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Mouflon, red fox, and wild boarOtter, red fox, and wolfIsrael and Italy[40,41,70,99,100,101]
Leptospira
Leptospira spp.No data foundNo data foundRodentCroatia[29]
Leptospira borpeterseniiNo data foundNo data foundRodentCroatia, France[102,103]
Leptospira interrogansNo data foundNo data foundRodentCroatia, France[29,102,103]
Leptospira kishneriNo data foundNo data foundRodentCroatia[103]
Leptospira santaroraiNo data foundNo data foundRodentCroatia[103]
Noehrlichia
Neoehrlichia mikurensisIxodes ricinusRodentRodentFrance and Italy[32,104]
Rickettsia
Rickettsia spp.Argas transgariepinus, Argas vespertilionis, Dermacentor marginatus, Haemaphysalis spp., Haemaphysalis puntata, Haemaphysalis sulcata, Hyalomma aegyptium, Hyalomma marginatum, Ixodes frontalis, Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes ventalloi, Rhipicephalus bursa, Rhipicephalus pusillus, Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l., and unknownBat, bird, hare, hedgehog, lizard, mouflon, red deer, roe deer, turtle, tortoise, and wild boarBird, mouflon, and otterAlgeria, Cyprus, Italy, Spain, and Turkey[23,47,48,49,58,63,71,72,73,84,99,101,105,106,107,108]
Rickettsia aeschlimanniiAm. marmoreum, Haemaphysalis spp., Hyalomma spp., Hyalomma aegyptium, Hyalomma marginatum, Hyalomma rufipes, Ixodes frontalis, and unknownBird, roe deer, tortoise, and wild boarNo data foundFrance, Greece, Israel, and Italy[98,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115]
Rickettsia africaeHyalomma spp., Hyalomma aegytium, Hyalomma detritum, Hyalomma marginatum, Hyaloma rufipes, Ixodes ricinus, and unknownBird, tortoise, and wild boarNo data foundAlgeria, Greece, Israel, Italy, and Turkey[48,98,108,109,110,116,117]
Rickettsia helveticaIxodes acuminatus, Ixodes festai, Ixodes ricinus, and Ixodes ventalloiBird, chamois, fallow deer, hedgehog, lizard, lynx, red deer, red fox, roe deer, and rodentNo data foundFrance, Italy, and Spain[11,32,63,70,84,92,106,118,119]
Rickettsia hoogstraaliiHaemaphysalis punctata, Haemaphysalis sulcata, and Ixodes ricinusLizard and mouflonNo data foundCyprus and Italy[70,84,120,121]
Rickettsia massiliaeHaemaphysalis erinacei, Rhipicephalus pusillus, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Hare, hedgehog, golden jackal, lynx, mongoose, red fox, roe deer, and wild boarNo data foundAlgeria, Cyprus, Israel, Italy, and Spain[70,75,113,117,118,119,120,121,122]
Rickettsia monacensisHaemaphysalis punctata, Ixodes ricinus, and Ixodes ventalloiBadger, bird, fallow deer, genet, hare, lizard, lynx, mongoose, red deer, red fox, roe deer, and rodentNo data foundSpain and Italy[11,32,59,63,83,84,91,106,118,119]
Rickettsia raoultiiDermacentor marginatus and Hyalomma spp.Bird, fallow deer, rodent, and wild boarNo data foundItaly and Spain[83,106,110,118,123]
Rickettsia sibiricaIxodes ricinusBirdNo data foundSpain[63]
Rickettsia sibirica mongolitimonaeRhipicephalus (Bo.) annulatusFallow deerNo data foundIsrael[117]
Rickettsia slovacaDermacentor marginatus, Haemaphysalis punctata, Ixodes ricinus, and Rhipicephalus bursaFallow deer, red deer, rodent, and wild boarRodent and Wild boarAlgeria, France, Italy, and Spain[59,75,83,106,107,112,118,120,123,124,125,126,127,128,129]
Candidatus Rickettsia barbariaeRhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Hare, mouflon, red fox, and wolfNo data foundCyprus, Italy, and Palestine[70,121,130]
Candidatus Rickettsia goldwasseriiHaemaphysalis adleri, Haemaphysalis parva, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.l.Golden jackal and wolfNo data foundIsrael and Palestine[113,130]
Candidatus Rickettsia africa septentrioalisOrnithodoros normandiRodentNo data foundTunisia[131]
Viruses
Flavivirus
Louping illNo data foundNo data foundRoe deer and wild boarFrance[132]
Maeban/Maeban-like virusOrnithodoros maritimusBirdsBirdsAlgeria, France, and Spain[133]
TBEVNo data foundNo data foundRodent, roe deer, and wild boarFrance and Slovenia[132,134,135,136]
Orthonairovirus
Tamdy orthonairovirusHyalomma spp. and Hyalomma marginatumRodentNo data foundTurkey[137]
CCHFHyalomma spp., Hyalomma aegyptium, Hyalomma lusitanicum, Hyalomma marginatum, Hyalomma rufipes, and Ixodes spp.Bird, red deer, and tortoiseTortoiseAlgeria, Italy, Morocco, Spain, and Turkey[63,138,139,140,141,142,143,144]
Table 2. TBPs detected in wild animal and their ticks in the Mediterranean Rim.
Table 2. TBPs detected in wild animal and their ticks in the Mediterranean Rim.
Animal namePathogens found in ticks (bbacteria, pparasite, vvirus)Pathogens found in animals (bbacteria, pparasite, vvirus)
Wild boarAnaplasma marginaleb, A. phagocytophilumb, Babesia spp. p, B. occultans p, B. rodaini p, B. rossi p, Coxiella burnetiib, Rickettsia spp. b, R. aeschlimanniib, R. africaeb, R. massiliaeb, R. raoultiib, R. slovacab, Theileria spp. pAnaplasma phagocytophilumb, Babesia bigemina p, Borrelia burgdoferi s.l. b, Louping ill, Rickettsia slovacab, Theileria spp., Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus v
Red deerAnaplasma marginaleb, A. phagocytophilumb, Bartonella acomodisb, Ba. baciliformsb, Ba. bovisb, Ba. chomeliib, Ba. tribocorumb, Ba. vinsonii berkoffib, Borrelia. burgdoferi s.l. b, Chlamydia abortusb, Crimean-Congo Haemmoraghic Fever virus v, Ehrlichia spp. b, Rickettsia spp. b, R. helveticab, R. monacensisb, R. slovacab, Theileria spp. pAnaplasma caprab, Babesia bigemina p, B. capreoli p, B. divergens p, Coxiella burnetiib, Theileria spp. p
BirdA. phagocytophilumb, Babesia capreoli p, B. venatorum p, Borrelia afzeliib, Bo. gariniib, Bo. lusitaniaeb, Bo. spielmaniib, Bo. valisianab, Bo. turdib, Coxiella burnetiib, Crimean-Congo Haemmoraghic Fever virus v, Ehrlichia spp. b, Maeban virus v, Rickettsia spp. b, R. aeschlimanniib, R. africaeb, R. helveticab, R. monacensisb, R. raoultiib, R. sibiricab, Theileria buffeli p, T. orientalis p, T. sergentis pAnaplasma spp. b, Bartonella spp. b, Borrelia burgdoferi s.l. b, Coxiella burnetiib,Rickettsia spp. b
RodentAnaplasma phagocytophilumb, Babesia microti p, B. venatorum p, Borrelia bavariensisb, Bo. burgdoferi s.l. b, Bo.burgdoferi s.s. b, Bo. cruciduraeb, Bo. gariniib, Bo. hispanicab, Bo. lusitaniaeb, Bo. merionesib, Bo. valaisianab, Coxiella burnetiib, Neoehrlichia mikurensisb, Rickettsia helveticab, R. monacensisb, R. raoultiib, R. slovacab, Candidatus R. africa septentrioalisb, Tamdy orthinairovirus v, Theileria annae pAnaplasma phagocytophilumb, Babesia spp. p, B. microti p, Bartonella spp. b, Ba. elizabethaeb, Borrelia spp. b, Bo. afzeliib, Bo. bavariensisb, Bo. burgdoferi s.l. b, Bo.burgdoferi s.s. b, Bo. gariniib, Bo. lusitaniaeb, Bo. merionesib, Bo. valaisianab, Coxiella burnetiib, Neoehrlichia mikurensisb, Leptospira spp. b, L. borpeterseniib, L. interrogansb, L. kishnerib, L. santaronib, Rickettsia slovacab, Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus v
Wild carnivoreAnaplasma ovisb, Chlamydia abortusb, Coxiella burnetiib, Rickettsia helveticab, R. massiliaeb, R. monacensisb, Candidatus R. barbariaeb, Candidatus R. goldwasseriibBabesia spp. p, B. canis p, Cytauxzonn spp. p, Ehrlichia canisb, Rickettsia spp. b, Theileria annulata p, T. capreoli p
Red foxAnaplasma ovisb, Babesia microti p, Bartonella spp. b, Chlamydia abortusb, Ehrlichia canisb, Rickettsia helveticab, R. massiliaeb, R. monacensisb, Candidatus R. barbariaeb, Theileria annae p, T. buffeli p, T. orientalis p, T. sergenti pAnaplasma phagocytophilumb, Babesia annae p, B. microti p, B. vulpes p, Coxiella burnetiib, Ehrlichia canisb, Hepatozoon canis p, Theileria annae p
TortoiseBorrelia spp. b, Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus v, Rickettsia spp. b, R. aeschlimanniib, R. africaebCrimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus v, Hemolivia mauritanica p
Fallow deerAnaplasma phagocytophilumb, Bartonella bacilliformisb, Ba. bovisb, Borrelia burdoferi s.l. b, Rickettsia helveticab, R. monacensisb, R. raoultiib, R. sibirica mongolitimonaeb, R. slovacab, Theileria spp. pAnaplasma phagocytophilumb
Roe deerBabesia spp. p, B. microti p, B. ovis p, B. rodainni p, Bartonella chomeliib, Borrelia burgdoferi s.l. b, Bo. burgdoferi s.s. b, Bo. lusitaniaeb, Coxiella burnetiib, Rickettsia spp. b, R. aeschlimanniib, R. helveticab, R. massilaeb, R. monacensisbAnaplasma phagocytophilumb, Borrelia burgdoferi s.l. b, Babesia spp. p, B. bigemina p, B. capreoli p, B. venatorum p, Cercopithifilaria rugosicauda p, Louping ill v, Theileria spp. p, Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus v
HedgehogAnaplasma spp. b, A. ovisb, Chlamydia abortusb, Rickettsia spp. b, R. helveticab, R. massiliaeb
MouflonAnaplasma ovisb, Chlamydia abortusb, Coxiella burnetiib, Ehrlichia canisb, Rickettsia spp. b, R. hoogstraaliib, Candidatus R. barbariaeb, Theileria buffeli p, T. orientalis p, T. ovis p, T. sergentis pAnaplasma ovisb, Coxiella burnetiib, Rickettsia spp. b
LizardBorrelia afzeliib, Bo. burgdoferi s.l. b, Bo gariniib, Bo. lusitaniaeb, Bo. valaisianab, Rickettsia spp. b, R. helveticab, R. hoogstraliib, R. monacensisbHepatozoon spp. p, H. kisrae p
ChamoisAnaplasma spp. b, Rickettsia helveticabBabesia capreoli p, Theileria spp. p, T. ovis p
HareCoxiella burnetiib, Rickettsia spp. b, R. massiliaeb, R. monacensisb, Candidatus R. barbariaebBabesia spp. p, Theileria spp. p
BatBartonella spp. b, Ba. tamiaeb, Coxiella burnettib, Rickettsia spp. b
Porcupine Anaplasma phagocytophilumb
Swamp deer Anaplasma caprab, A. phagocytophilumb
Table 3. Ticks and tick-borne pathogens from wild animals on Mediterranean islands.
Table 3. Ticks and tick-borne pathogens from wild animals on Mediterranean islands.
CountryIslandSurface AreaWestern Basin/Eastern BasinPathogen
(A: Positive Animals, T: Positive Ticks)
Positive TicksPositive Ticks HostPositive Pathogen HostsReferences
CyprusCyprus9251 km2EasternAnaplasma spp A,T., A. ovis A,T, C. burnetii A,T, Rickettsia spp. A,T, R. aeschlimannii T, R. hoogstraalii T, R. massiliae T, R. sibirica mongolotimonae T, Candidatus R. barbariae TH. punctata, H. sulcata, Hy. excavatum, Hy. marginatum, Hy. rufipes, I. gibbosus, I. ventalloi, Rh. bursa, Rh. sanguineus s.l.Birds, mouflon, red foxBirds, mouflon[49,71,121]
GreeceAntikythira22 km2EasternRickettsia spp. T, R. aeschlimannii T, R. africae TAmblyomma sp., Haemaphysalis sp., Hy. marginatum, Hy. rufipes, Ixodes sp., I. frontalis, Rhipicephalus sp.BirdsNo data found[108]
FranceCorsica8722 km2WesternLeptospira borpetersenii A, L. interrogansA, R. aechlimanniiT, R. massiliaeT, R. monacensisT, R. slovacaT, Candidatus R. barbariae TD. marginatus, Hy. aegyptium, Hy. marginatum, Hy. rufipes, I. ricinus, Rh. bursaBirds, tortoise, and wild boarRodent[102,112,114]
ItalyAsinara51.90 km2WesternCCHF THaemaphysalis spp., H. punctata Hyalomma sp., I. ricinusBirdsNo data found[183]
Capri10.40 km2WesternA. phagocytophilumT, CCHF T, Rickettsia spp. T, R. aechlimannii T, R. africae TAmblyomma sp., Haemaphysalis sp., H. punctata, Hyalomma sp., Hy. marginatum, Hy. rufipes, Ixodes sp., I. frontalis, I. ricinus, Rhipicephalus sp.BirdsNo data found[60,108]
Pianosa10.25 km2WesternBo. spielmaniiT, Bo. valaisianaT, CCHF T, R. aeschlimanniiT, R. helveticaTHaemaphysalis spp., H. punctata, Hyalomma spp., Hy. dentritum, Hy. marginatum, I. accuminatus, I. ricinus, I. ventalloiBirdsNo data found[92,183]
Ponza7.300 km2WesternCCHF T, R. aeschlimannii T, R. africae T, R. raoultii TA. marmoreum, Haemaphysalis spp., H. punctata, Hyalomma spp., Hy. marginatum, I. frontalis, I. ricinus, I. ventalloiBirdsNo data found[110,183]
Sardinia24,090 km2WesternA. ovisT, A. phagocytophilumT, B. bigeminaT, Bartonella spp. T, C. burnetii T, Ch. abortus T, Ch. psitacci T, E. canis T, Rickettsia spp. T, R. aeschlimannii T, R. conorii israelensis T, R. helvetica T, R. hoogstraalii T, R. massiliae T, R. slovaca T, Candidatus R. barbariae T, T. buffeli/sergneti/orientalis T, T. equi T, T. ovis TD. marginatus, H. punctata, H. sulcata, Hy. marginatum, I. festai, Rh. annulatus, Rh. bursa, Rh. pusillus, Rh sanguineus s.l.Birds, hedgehog, marten, mouflon, red deer, red fox, wild boarNo data found[46,70,93,101,120,124,126]
Sicily25,711 km2WesternA. marginaleA, A. phagocytophilumA, A. ovisANo data foundNo data foundPorcupine, rodent[69]
Ustica8.240 km2WesternCCHF THaemaphysalis spp., H. punctata Hyalomma spp., I. ricinusBirdsNo data found[183]
Ventotene1.540 km2WesternCCHF THy. rufipesBirdsNo data found[143]
Zannone0.9 km2WesternCCHF THaemaphysalis spp., H. punctata Hyalomma spp., I. ricinusBirdsNo data found[183]
SpainColumbretes0.19 km2WesternMaedan virus A,TO. maritimusBirdsBirds[133]
Isla Grosa17.5 km2WesternMaedan virus A,TO. maritimusBirdsBirds[133]
Mallorca3640 km2WesternMaedan virus A,TO. maritimusBirdsBirds[133]
Medes0.215 km2WesternMaedan virus A,TO. maritimusBirdsBirds[133]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Defaye, B.; Moutailler, S.; Pasqualini, V.; Quilichini, Y. A Systematic Review of the Distribution of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Wild Animals and Their Ticks in the Mediterranean Rim between 2000 and 2021. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091858

AMA Style

Defaye B, Moutailler S, Pasqualini V, Quilichini Y. A Systematic Review of the Distribution of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Wild Animals and Their Ticks in the Mediterranean Rim between 2000 and 2021. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(9):1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Defaye, Baptiste, Sara Moutailler, Vanina Pasqualini, and Yann Quilichini. 2022. "A Systematic Review of the Distribution of Tick-Borne Pathogens in Wild Animals and Their Ticks in the Mediterranean Rim between 2000 and 2021" Microorganisms 10, no. 9: 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10091858

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop