Next Article in Journal
Short-Term Effects of Climate Change on Planktonic Heterotrophic Prokaryotes in a Temperate Coastal Lagoon: Temperature Is Good, Ultraviolet Radiation Is Bad, and CO2 Is Neutral
Previous Article in Journal
A Uniform Design Method Can Optimize the Combinatorial Parameters of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy, Including the Concentrations of Methylene Blue and Potassium Iodide, Light Dose, and Methylene Blue’s Incubation Time, to Improve Fungicidal Effects on Candida Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Investigation of the Persistence, Toxicological Effects, and Ecological Issues of S-Triazine Herbicides and Their Biodegradation Using Emerging Technologies: A Review

by
Sajjad Ahmad
1,2,3,*,†,
Murugesan Chandrasekaran
4,† and
Hafiz Waqas Ahmad
5
1
Environmental Sustainability & Health Institute (ESHI), City Campus, School of Food Science & Environmental Health, Technological University Dublin, Grangegorman Lower, D07 EWV4 Dublin, Ireland
2
Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management of Crop in South China, Key Laboratory of Natural Pesticide and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
4
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University, Neungdong-ro 209, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(10), 2558; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102558
Submission received: 30 September 2023 / Revised: 9 October 2023 / Accepted: 11 October 2023 / Published: 13 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Microbe Interactions)

Abstract

:
S-triazines are a group of herbicides that are extensively applied to control broadleaf weeds and grasses in agricultural production. They are mainly taken up through plant roots and are transformed by xylem tissues throughout the plant system. They are highly persistent and have a long half-life in the environment. Due to imprudent use, their toxic residues have enormously increased in the last few years and are frequently detected in food commodities, which causes chronic diseases in humans and mammals. However, for the safety of the environment and the diversity of living organisms, the removal of s-triazine herbicides has received widespread attention. In this review, the degradation of s-triazine herbicides and their intermediates by indigenous microbial species, genes, enzymes, plants, and nanoparticles are systematically investigated. The hydrolytic degradation of substituents on the s-triazine ring is catalyzed by enzymes from the amidohydrolase superfamily and yields cyanuric acid as an intermediate. Cyanuric acid is further metabolized into ammonia and carbon dioxide. Microbial-free cells efficiently degrade s-triazine herbicides in laboratory as well as field trials. Additionally, the combinatorial approach of nanomaterials with indigenous microbes has vast potential and considered sustainable for removing toxic residues in the agroecosystem. Due to their smaller size and unique properties, they are equally distributed in sediments, soil, water bodies, and even small crevices. Finally, this paper highlights the implementation of bioinformatics and molecular tools, which provide a myriad of new methods to monitor the biodegradation of s-triazine herbicides and help to identify the diverse number of microbial communities that actively participate in the biodegradation process.

1. Introduction

Since the 1950s, synthetic s-triazine herbicides (e.g., atrazine, atraton, ametryn, cyanazine, prometryn, prometon, propazine, simazine, simetryn, terbutryn, trietazine, terbuthylazine, metribuzin, terbumeton, simeton, and desmetryn) have been extensively applied in the agriculture sector for the control of broadleaf weeds and annual grasses all over the globe [1] (Figure 1). Besides this, these compounds and their derivatives are excessively applied in other industrial applications such as the chlorine disinfection process, electrical varnishes, and the reduction of nitrogen oxides in stationary diesel engine exhaust gases, and as dyes, pharmaceuticals, explosives, polymer intermediates, and fire retardants [2]. Some have been banned for application in developed countries due to their high risk of pollution in the agroecosystem [3]. These herbicides are taken up via plant roots and by xylem tissues circulated throughout the plant system. Triazines act by inhibiting photosynthesis in leaves, particularly impeding the photosystem. They can absorb various fruits’ and vegetables’ surface skin and enter their flesh part [4].
The imprudent application of this group of herbicides in agriculture and forestry means that their residues are frequently detected in water and food crops such as fruits and vegetables. Moreover, their residues are also detected in various food-processed products such as fruit juices [5]. The typical s-triazine herbicides, such as atrazine, simazine, and propazine, generated sub-lethal effects on another non-organisms (Figure 2). The hazardous residues of these compounds cause many chronic diseases in living organisms, such as the fluctuation of hormones, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, reduced birth rate, and reproductive diseases in different vertebrates, including mammals and humans [6]. More alarmingly, the imprudent use of triazines affected beneficial flora and fauna, such as changing the flowering and blooming stages and collapsing the colony order of pollinators and predators. Additionally, a large number of triazine herbicides prevent electron transport in the photosynthesis process [7]. Recently, Tian et al. [8] established a simple, reliable, cost-effective, and eco-friendly method for the simultaneous detection of s-triazine herbicides, especially atrazine, prometryn, and simetryn from honey samples. Their results showed that the maximum residual limit of all herbicides was 0.1 to 1.5 µg/kg.
It has been shown that more than 70% of residues of s-triazines enter the aquatic system through leaching or underground surface runoff [9]. These hazardous substances threaten aquatic creatures such as fish, amphibians, crabs, beneficial algae, and other micro and macro marine organisms [10,11]. Recent research explained that the residues of triazine herbicides are found at high ratios in different muscles and other body parts, such as the liver, of birds, mammals, and fish [12]. To elevate the agroecosystem toxicity of s-triazine herbicides, efficient, less costly, attractive, eco-friendly, and sustainable techniques are immediately required to remove these hazardous compounds. In general, the removal of various toxic pollutants and their transformation into less toxic substances from the ecosystem can be achieved via different methods and their associated techniques, such as physical adsorption, the advanced oxidation process, chemical remediation, photoremediation, phytoremediation, and biodegradation [13]. Among all the techniques, biodegradation using indigenous microbial species to remediate s-triazine herbicides and their hybridization with nanomaterials and plants (phytoremediation) is considered more effective, low-cost, eco-friendly, and more prominent [14].
For decades, many microbial species have been isolated from the environment, making it feasible to degrade different types of hazardous compounds to preserve the environment [15]. Until early 1990, numerous studies revealed that the bacterial metabolism of s-triazine herbicides, especially for atrazine in an open field environment, occurs through N-dealkylation of the s-triazine ring and does not typically lead to ring cleavage [16,17]. Later on, since 1995, many microbial strains that degrade s-triazine herbicides via the hydroxylation process, followed by the direct removal of alkylamino groups, have been investigated [18]. More interestingly, these microbial strains were reported to possess more effective properties, such as the complete mineralization of s-triazines and their toxic metabolites, validating the approach of microbial strains to degrade xenobiotics at a higher degradation rate for future practical applications [19]. Besides the use of microbial strains to achieve the efficient bioremediation of s-triazines, various microbial enzymes and genes provide fundamental insights to recognize transformation pathways to less toxic products [20].
To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to report on s-triazine herbicides. It mainly focuses on the toxicity, persistence, and biodegradation of s-triazine herbicides. This study highlights potential enzymes and genes that impart foundational insights for understanding the transformation pathway and ultimately influencing the efficacy of the biodegradation strategy. Additionally, we focus on the recent development of microbial active-element-centered techniques with material science and plant science using modern biological molecular tools, which establish a myriad of promising strategies to promote the potential for environmental monitoring and improving the in situ degradation of s-triazines. Also, we focus on the recent developments in nanotechnology and the synthesis of nanoparticles via physical, chemical, and biological methods and their conjugation with whole cells, enzymes, and genes, which create a myriad of encouraging techniques to enhance the degradation rate of s-triazine herbicides and other agrochemicals and xenobiotics such as dyes, heavy metals, microplastics, and other emerging micropollutants for environmental monitoring and their conservation. This review offers additional information to that provided by other published studies of nanotechnology, molecular biology, and microbial agents in environmental cleanup. Our work will interest many readers, including environmentalists, biologists, agronomists, and materials scientists.

2. Potential Microbial Species Employed for Biodegradation of S-Triazines

Microbes play a vital role in the clean-up of various kinds of contaminants from the environment because they can survive and withstand stress in several ways [21]. The employment of microbial species to degrade various pollutants (heavy metals, dyes, pesticides, hydrocarbons, antibiotics, and other emerging pollutants) has received a wide range of attention [22]. More interestingly, the degradation of pesticides using microbial species usually did not generate any secondary toxic substances after mineralization and was shown to be its crucial feature [23]. Besides this, using a co-metabolism mechanism, indigenous microbial species effectively degraded toxic compounds into less toxic substances, which they can further utilize as a carbon and energy source [15].
The degradation rate and activation of microbial species in a contaminated place are dependent on various biotic and abiotic factors such, as the concentration of hazardous compounds, their structure and solubility, the kind of soil, moisture content, temperature, pH, soil nutrients, and organic matter [24,25]. A small unit of one cubic meter collected from any topsoil potentially has millions of microorganisms, including fungi, approximately ten times more bacteria and actinomycetes, slightly fewer nematodes, thousands of macroscopic earthworms, and innumerable protozoa and algae [26]. Furthermore, they can secrete various intracellular and extracellular enzymes, targeting contaminants accumulated in the environment and altered into their derivatives, which can further be used by microbial genera [27]. However, microbial communities play a crucial role in the bio-purification system and clean up the polluted environment efficiently (Figure 3).
The unwise use of s-triazine in various sectors has received serious attention from researchers worldwide due to its high toxicity and acute persistence in the ecosystem and human health. In the s-triazine group, atrazine is widely applied to control grass and broadleaf weeds in cash crops such as sugarcane, wheat, maize, and rice [28,29]. Due to its long half-life (42–231 days) and low adsorption ability in agricultural soil, it not only pollutes the soil, but its residues also penetrate groundwater and are frequently detected in drinking water [30]. In previous studies, numerous indigenous and non-indigenous microbial species were reported that rapidly degraded s-triazine herbicides from the polluted environment (Table 1).
Recently, Cao et al. [31] isolated a bacterial strain, Arthrobacter sp. C2, from atrazine-contaminated soil. After genomic identification, different parameters and degradation characteristics were analyzed for atrazine degradation. The genomic results indicated that this bacterial strain comprises 4,305,216 base pair nucleotides, three plasmids, and 4705 coding genes. Meanwhile, the degradation results revealed that this bacterial strain could survive more efficiently at 30 °C and at a pH range of 7–9, and degraded atrazine from low to high concentrations at 1, 10, and 100 mg/L with degradation rates of 0.34, 1.94, and 18.64 mg/L per day, respectively. Last, in the same study, the metabolic pathway of atrazine was proposed, and the authors identified four metabolites named hydroxyatrazine, N-isopropylammelide, deisopropylhydroxyatrazine, and cyanuric acid. This study concluded that the bacterial strain C2 is a potential agent for the biodegradation of atrazine in the agroecosystem. In another study, Chen et al. [32] isolated a native microbial strain, Paenarthrobacter sp. W11, from the soil to degrade atrazine smoothly by adopting bioaugmentation and biodegradation techniques in wheat crops, and the alteration of microbial species during the degradation mechanism was analyzed. Their results demonstrated that the bioaugmentation process efficiently enhanced the degradation rate of atrazine in soil and reduced the toxic effects of residues on wheat growth. The findings of this study also revealed that Methylobacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. played a more crucial role in the biodegradation process because their relative abundance significantly matched the relative abundance of the strain Paenarthrobacter sp. W11 and the atrazine mineralization pathway. This study provides new insight into the collaboration of native microbial species and external inoculums for removing atrazine. Zhu et al. [33] isolated a bacterial strain from the soil and, based on 16 rRNA and morphological and physiological analysis, identified it as Bacillus atrophaeus YQJ-6 for the effective removal of atrazine from the ecosystem by investigating a variety of parameters, such as the effect of temperature, initial concentration, and effect of pH. The results of this study explained that strain YQJ-6 efficiently degraded atrazine 99.2% at a concentration of 50 mg/L and a wide range of temperatures (30–40 °C) and pH (7–7.5). A tolerance test of the bacterial strain was also conducted, and the findings showed that this strain could tolerate 1000 mg/L atrazine.
A bacterial strain, Arthrobacter ureafaciens XMJ-Z01, was isolated from soil and its degradation ability tested against simazine. The results showed that this strain revealed high resistance and tolerated simazine up to a concentration of 2000 mg/L, and within a week, was able to degrade 99.1% at a concentration of 100 mg/L. Besides this, its effect on accelerating the degradation ability of soil enzymes was tested by adding less fresh soil to the culture medium. The results demonstrated that this strain reduced the toxicity and adverse effects of simazine on soil enzymes [34]. In another study, a bacterial strain, Arthrobacter urefaciens, was screened, and their degradation ability for simazine was examined. Using this bacterial strain, 100% degradation of simazine was achieved in four days [35]. The complete degradation of ametryn at a concentration of 2 mg/L was achieved in 5 days by the bacterial strain Nocardioides DN36 [18]. Guo et al. [36] isolated a bacterial strain from contaminated soil and identified it as Arthrobacter sp. SD3-25, which efficiently degraded simazine toxic residues from the environment. They found that external carbon sources such as sucrose enhance the quantity of simazine-degrading genes (trzN, atzB, and atzC) in bacteria-amended soil. Moreover, this bacterial stain effectively degraded simazine and enhanced microbial communities in soil.
Table 1. Functional microbial species involved in the effective biodegradation of s-triazine herbicides.
Table 1. Functional microbial species involved in the effective biodegradation of s-triazine herbicides.
Target S-Triazine HerbicideMicroorganismsSource of IsolationDegradation (%)References
AtrazineAcinetobacter sp. Strain A6Polluted soil80[37]
Rhodococcus sp. BCH2Polluted soil75[38]
Bacillus badius ABP6Maize field89.7[39]
Arthrobacter sp. C3Corn field100[40]
Cryptococcus laurentiiAgricultural soil100[41]
Klebsiella variicola FH-1
Arthrobacter sp. NJ-1
Polluted soil97.4[42]
Ochrobactrum oryzaeWastewater83.5[43]
Rhodobacter sphaeroides W16Agricultural soil96.86[44]
Penicillium sp.Corn field50[45]
Pseudomonas sp. ADPCommercial99[46]
Citricoccus sp. strain TT3Wastewater100[47]
Alcaligenes sp. S3Agricultural field90.56[48]
Arthrobacter sp. DNS10
Enterobacter sp. P1
Polluted soil99.18[49]
Pseudomonas sp.Agricultural soil99[50]
Pleurotus ostreatus INCQS 40310Commercial82[51]
AtratonLeucobacter sp. JW-1Polluted soil98[52]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Polluted soil13[53]
Pseudomonas sp. V1Wastewater10[54]
AmetrynChryseobacterium sp. Variovorax sp., Aeromonas sp. and Xanthobacter sp.Agricultural soil97[55]
Rhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTAgricultural soil50[56]
Scenedesmus vacuolatusWastewater94.7[57]
Acidithiobacillu ferrooxidansAcid mine drainage84.9[58]
Arthrobacter sp. MCM B-436Rhizosphere soil92[59]
Acidithiobcillus ferrooxidans BMSNITK17Soil94.24[60]
Pseudomonas sp. YAYA6Soil50[61]
Pseudomonas sp. DY-1Paddy field87.8[62]
Rhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTSoil48.9[56]
Nocardioides sp. DN36Paddy field100[18]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil99.9[52]
CyanazineAgrobacterium radiobacte M91-3Commercial100[63]
Arthrobacter nicotinovorans HIMAgricultural soil100[64]
Rhodococcus corallinus, Pseudomonas sp. DSoil99[65]
Rhodococcus TE1Soil100[66]
Acinetobacter sp. A6Agricultural soil100[67]
Arthrobacter sp. MCM B-436Rhizosphere soil97[59]
DesmetrynPseudomonas sp. DY-1Paddy field93.6[62]
Rhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTSoil63.9[56]
DimethametrynRhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTAgricultural soil100[68]
Bacillus cereus JUN7Soil100[69]
Rhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTSoil81.1[56]
Nocardioides sp. DN36Paddy field100[18]
Pleurotus mutilusCommercial70[70]
Burkholderia cepacia
CH-9
Soil86[71]
Botrytis cinerea, Sordaria superba, Absidia fuscaWastewater50[72]
Paracoccus sp. QCT6Polluted soil86.4[73]
Bacillus subtilisAgricultural soil98[74]
Pseudomonas sp. DY-1Paddy field38.2[62]
Rhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTSoil75.5[56]
Nocardioides sp. DN36Paddy field100[18]
PrometrynMicrobacterium sp., Enterobacter sp., Acinetobacter sp., and Flavobacterium sp.Soil100[75]
Rhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTSoil75.5[56]
Nocardioides sp. DN36Paddy field100[18]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil100[52]
Aspergillus sp.Commercial61[76]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil100[53]
Pseudomonas sp. DY-1Agricultural soil100[62]
PrometonLeucobacter sp. JW-1Soil95.2[52]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil10[53]
PropazineLeucobacter sp. JW-1Soil100[52]
Pseudomonas stutzeri sp. Y2Commercial96[77]
Arthrobacter sp. MCM B-436Rhizosphere soil87[59]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil41[53]
Pleurotus ostreatus INCQS 40310Commercial90[78]
Phanerochaete chrysosporiumCommercial100[79]
SimazineKlebsiella pneumoniaeSoil100[80]
Arthrobacter sp. MCM B-436Rhizosphere soil73[59]
β-proteobacterium CDB21Bacterial consortium100[81]
Bradyrhizobium japonicam CSB1, Arthrobacter
sp. CD7w and β-Proteobacteria CDB21
Agricultural soil100[68]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil77.9[52]
Phanerochaete chrysosporiumCommercial100[79]
Arthrobacter ureafaciens XMJ-Z01Soil99.1[34]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil28[53]
Pseudomonas stutzeri sp. Y2Commercial100[77]
SimetrynPseudomonas sp. DY-1Paddy field90.2[62]
Rhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTAgricultural soil100[68]
Nocardioides sp. DN36Paddy field100[18]
Rhodococcus sp. FJ1117YTSoil100[56]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil100[53]
Bacillus cereus JUN7Soil100[69]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil77.9[52]
SimetonNocardioides sp. DN36Paddy field100[18]
TerbuthylazineLeucobacter sp. JW-1Soil98.9[52]
Pseudomonas stutzeri sp. Y2Commercial100[77]
Phanerochaete chrysosporiumCommercial100[79]
TerbumetonLeucobacter sp. JW-1Soil31.6[52]
Leucobacter sp. JW-1Soil12[53]
Microbial degradation summary: This table contains a list of microbial species that are likely to be involved in the biodegradation of s-triazine herbicides. Microbial biodegradation is an important process in environmental remediation, as certain microorganisms have the ability to break down herbicides and other pollutants into less harmful compounds. This table includes information about the species names, source of isolation, target compound, and their effectiveness in breaking down s-triazine herbicides.
Gopal et al. [71] used a potential bacterial strain, Burkholderia cepacia CH9, which was screened for its degradation of the metribuzin herbicide. They found that the bacterial strain efficiently degraded 86% metribuzin at a concentration of 50 mg/L in a mineral salt medium within 20 days. Recently, Wahla et al. (2020) [82] used immobilized metribuzin-degrading bacteria (Rhodococcus rhodochrous AQ1, Bacillus tequilensis AQ2, Bacillus aryabhattai AQ3, and Bacillus safensis AQ4) on biochar and evaluated their degradation efficiency in the lab as well as in a field-scale environment in a tomato field. Their results showed that potato-vegetated soil-free bacterial cells could degrade 82% of metribuzin, while an immobilized consortium degraded 96%. Moreover, this study clarified that the immobilized microbial consortium was involved in plant growth and restoring indigenous soil microbial communities and soil nutrients. Further, an indigenous potential bacterial strain, Nocardioides sp. ATD6, isolated from paddy soil showed efficient degradation of melamine, converted into ammeline and ammelide, and accumulated as cyanuric acid and ammonium [83]. Similar results were found for the soil bacterium Microbacterium esteramaticum MEL1, which is considered a superior agent for the degradation of melamine and its metabolites, such as ammeline, ammelide, and cyanuric acid [84]. Zhang et al. [77] isolated Pseudomonas stutzeri Y2 from contaminated soil and used it for the degradation of a group of s-triazine herbicides with the help of different immobilized carriers. Their results revealed that the immobilized bacterial strain completely degraded atrazine, simazine, terbuthylazine, and 96% of propazine in 4 days at the initial 50 mg/L concentration. But they did not find that it had degradation efficiency against ametryn, prometryn, atraton, and prometon. This research concluded that strain Y2 was a prominent agent that can degrade not only chlorine-containing s-triazine herbicides but also the other types of s-triazine herbicides that contain methylthio groups, like ametryn and prometryn, and methoxy groups, such as atraton and prometon. In another study, cells of the bacterial strain Leucobacter sp. JW-1 were immobilized in polyvinyl alcohol and sodium alginate carrier materials to achieve better degradation results. The degradation experiment results demonstrated that immobilized beads effectively degraded 99.9%, 99.9%, 97.8%, 100%, 77.9%, 98.9%, 95.2%, 98.9%, and 31.6% of atrazine, ametryn, propazine, simetryn, simazine, terbuthylazine, prometon, atraton, and terbumeton, respectively, at an initial concentration of 50 mg/L. This study concluded that immobilized bacterial cells could degrade herbicides more rapidly than free cells and could be reused again [52]. Radosevich et al. [85] isolated soil bacterium M91-3 and found that this strain grew more rapidly in glucose enrichment media and was able to degrade atrazine, cyanazine, and simazine.
In addition to bacterial species, fungal strains are also extensively applied for the remediation of s-triazine herbicides and other xenobiotics from the agroecosystem due to promising characteristics such as the secretion of intracellular and extracellular enzymes [86]. Fungal strains contain mycelia that facilitate intense diffusion into the agroecosystem and provide better surface area for the absorption of xenobiotics [87]. All these properties of fungal species are considered prominent tools for cleaning up environmental pollutants [88].
Recently, Esparza-Naranjo et al. [89] studied the degradation of atrazine by isolating fungal strains from the environment and investigating their metabolic pathways. In this study, nine fungal strains produced a ligninolytic enzyme. Four fungal strains (Fusarium spp. CCLM-GU, CCLM-DF, CCLM-IB, and CCLM-GW) were involved in catabolism. They degraded atrazine into deethylatrazine, whereas the other five fungal strains efficiently degraded atrazine. Moreover, two strains of CCLM-GW and CCLM-GU more effectively reduced toxicity and residual levels according to the Allium cepa (onion) assay results. Aspergillus niger is a potential filamentous fungal species that degrades pollutants such as pectin, cellulose, dyes, heavy metals, and other organic and inorganic polymers. To degrade atrazine, this fungal strain was isolated from the soil, and its degradation efficiency was characterized by analyzing different parameters like temperature, soil humidity, and co-substrate for bio-stimulation. This research showed that using O. ficus indica 10 wt% as a co-substrate with 80% humidity achieved 75% degradation in six days [90]. In another study, a fungus strain, Pleurotus ostreatus INCQS 40310, was isolated from a contaminated site, and was capable of degrading atrazine from 90.3% to 94.5% within 10–15 days in the presence of FeSO4 and MnSO4 salts. Furthermore, different metabolites of atrazine, the purification of laccase enzymes from the fungus strain, and their activity in the degradation process were evaluated. The findings showed that the fungal strain effectively degraded atrazine residues and was considered a potential agent [91].
To gain the best degradation in the natural environment and for wastewater treatment, recently, the fungal strain Bjerkandera adusta was isolated from rotten wood surfaces and its degradation efficiency was optimized using various parameters, such as the concentration of atrazine, pH range, and the effect of temperature and biomass. The results of this study revealed that fungal strains survive better at a pH range of 2–8, a temperature of 16–32 °C, biomass of 1–5 g, and a concentration of 25–100 mg/L, and degraded 92% in six days [92]. To degrade toxic residues of propazine in wastewater, the fungal strain P. ostreatus INCQS 40310 was cultured in two different media, PMP 7 and PMP 12, and their degradation ability was assessed. The results showed that the fungal strain gave satisfactory results in PMP 12 culture media and degraded 90% of propazine [78]. The fungal species P. mutilus was isolated from a contaminated site, and the adsorption of the metribuzin herbicide was examined. This research concluded that the fungal strain adsorbed 70% of metribuzin at an initial concentration of 200 mg/L, a temperature of 25 °C, a pH range of 2–3, biomass content of 3 g, and a rotation speed of 250 rpm [70]. Funneliformis mosseae was combined with biochar and the authors investigated its degradation efficiency for decomposing simazine in two agricultural soils. The findings expressed that the mutual relationship between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, plants, and biochar-mediated soil significantly inhibited simazine decomposition. In contrast, soil inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar efficiently reduced the concentration of simazine. This study attributed these results to variation in the soil’s sorption capacity due to biochar amendment and the inoculation of fungal strains [93]. A soil yeast was isolated from the soil, identified as Lipomyces starkeyi, and its degradation efficiency was tested against s-triazine herbicides. The results of this study showed that the yeast strain efficiently degraded and assimilated triazine herbicides (atrazine, ametryn, cyanazine, prometryn, and simazine) [94]. Recently, to remove atrazine and other toxic compounds (nitrate, magnesium, phosphorous, zinc, oxadiazon, and triallate) from wastewater, a microalgae, Scenedesmus sp., was immobilized in a continuous flow reactor system. The results revealed that at temperatures of 20–35 °C and a one-week hydraulic retention time, the algal beads were able to degrade 97% of nitrate and 70% of atrazine. The capability of algal beads to degrade all pollutants in actual wastewater was also tested. The findings showed that algal beads also perform well and degrade 92%, 100%, 99.9%, and 92% of nitrate, magnesium, phosphorous, and zinc, respectively. However, some herbicides diffused back into the solution toward the end of the treatment process [95].

2.1. Degradation of S-Triazines Using Microbial Enzymes and Genes

Microbial species metabolize s-triazine herbicides through enzyme-catalyzed reactions. The hydrolytic remediation of substituents on the s-triazine ring is catalyzed by enzymes from the amidohydrolase superfamily, generating a cyanuric acid metabolite. Further, the hydrolytic reaction converts cyanuric acid into ammonia and carbon dioxide. Thus, the efficiency of single and microbial consortiums in biodegradation mainly depends on various kinds of intracellular and extracellular enzymes and potential genes are produced, which are directly or indirectly involved in the degradation process and enhance the degradation rate of xenobiotics [96]. Recently, Zhou et al. [97] found that purified amidohydrolase enzymes, i.e., N-isopropylammelide isopropylaminohydrolase (AtzC) from bacterial strain Leucobacter triazinivorans JW-1, were effective against the biodegradation of s-triazine herbicides. Purified AtzC is involved in the catalyzation of the amidohydrolysis of N-isopropylammelide and converted into cyanuric acid. The activity of catalytic residues (His253, His60, His62, His211, Asp307) in AtzC during the process of N-isopropylammelide hydrolysis was also reported based on molecular docking and bioinformatic analysis. Jiang et al. [98,99] isolated a bacterial strain, Arthrobacter sp. DNS10, from polluted soil. They evaluated bacterial genes and enzymes for the degradation of atrazine in the presence and absence of the nicosulfuron herbicide, which is widely applied in the agricultural sector in combination with s-triazine herbicides. They found a carbohydrolase gene (trzN) from Arthrobacter sp. DNS10, and revealed that 76% of atrazine was degraded without nicosulfuron in 48 h. At concentrations of 1, 5, and 10 mg/L and in the presence of nicosulfuron, the bacterial genes could degrade 63.9%, 49.1%, and 42.6, respectively.
Liang et al. [62]’s gene knockout study showed that the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Pseudomonas sp. DY-1 could degrade prometryn using Baeyer–Villiger monooxygenase. The result of gene knockouts demonstrated that enzymes are actively involved in the degradation of prometryn, which provides new molecular insights for removing s-triazine herbicides from the polluted environment. James et al. [100] reported the biodegradation of atrazine by two bacterial strains, Pseudomonas spp. strains ACB and TLB, and screened intracellular crude enzymes’ ability to enhance the degradation rate. Their results showed that enzymes purified from the strain ACB revealed the highest degradation of atrazine at 71% at temperatures of 30–40 °C and pH 6, whereas the enzymes extracted from the bacterial strain TLB were able to degrade at 48–46% under the same conditions. Furthermore, the purified enzymes were exposed to protein profiling investigation. The findings of protein profiling demonstrated that atrazine induced the expression of CoA ester lyase and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase in the strains ACB and TLB, respectively.
Wackett et al. [101] proposed that Pseudomonas sp. ADP carried a plasmid, pADP-1, which was entirely sequenced and encompasses potential genes involved in atrazine degradation. Furthermore, this study explained that the recombinant Escherichia coli strain contains atrazine chlorohydrolase enzymes constructed and chemically cross-linked to produce catalytic particles employed for atrazine degradation in soil. A Pseudomonas sp. strain, NRRLB-12227, potentially degraded s-triazine herbicides and was used as a sole source of carbon and energy. Further, the trzD genes encoded by cyanuric acid amidohydrolase were cloned into pMMB277, capable of deleting s-triazine herbicides. The Arthrobacter aurescens strain TC1 was screened without enrichment by plating atrazine-polluted soil directly onto atrazine-clearing plates. The rapid growth of this strain in a liquid medium in the presence of atrazine at a concentration of 3000 mg/L was observed. The bacterial strain utilized herbicides such as carbon, energy, and nitrogen. Moreover, this bacterial strain provides rapid growth in other s-triazine-related compounds such as ametryn, atratone, cyanazine, prometryn, and simazine. The results of the PCR experiment identified different s-triazine-degrading genes from the Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP, which showed a high resemblance to atzB and atzC but not to atzA [102]. Balotra et al. [103] reported that AtzDEF proteins were shown to form an extensive range of enzymes that have the potential to degrade s-triazine metabolites, such as cyanuric acid, and generate non-toxic products such as ammonia and carbon dioxide. Paenarhtrobacter aurescens TC1 was originally isolated from atrazine-polluted soil. It converts atrazine into a cyanuric acid metabolite.
Genes (atzABCDEF) involved in the degradation of s-triazine herbicides might be placed in a larger plasmid of different microbial species, especially for bacterial chromosomes [104,105]. An indigenous β-proteobacterium strain, CDB21, was screened from soil that potentially degraded simazine. Via molecular mechanisms, a complete set of simazine-degrading genes (atzABCDEF) were investigated, and their degradation capability examined. The results revealed that significant degradation of simazine was observed. The genes trzN, atzB, and atzC in Paenarhtrobacter aurescens TC1 revealed that they are potentially involved in the degradation of the atrazine herbicide. Moreover, the genes trzN, atzB, and atzC are situated on the plasmid of Paenarhtrobacter aurescens TC1. This study explained that all the enzymes that potentially degrade atrazine encoded by trzN, atzB, and atzC belong to the amidohydrolase superfamily [106]. In another study, a bacterial strain, Arthrobacter MCM B-436, was cultured from vetiver rhizosphere soil and the authors investigated their degradation efficiency by free cells and using their associated genes. The results revealed that the atrazine degradation genes atzB, atzC, atzD, and trzN of Arthrobacter MCM B-436 and their enzymes were all located in its genome and efficiently degraded atrazine into its derivatives [59]. The role in atrazine degradation of trzN was confirmed in Arthrobacter sp. C3. Triazine hydrolase encoded by trzN can degrade atrazine into a nontoxic hydroxyatrazine [40]. trzN, atzB, and atzC in Arthrobacter sp. SD3-25 was revealed to degrade simazine into cyanuric acid. Interestingly, the efficiency of degrading simazine can be increased with increasing sucrose concentration [107]. Fajardo et al. [108] isolated four different bacterial species from polluted soil, recognizing them as Acinetobacter lwoffii, Pseudomonas putida, Rhizobium sp., and Pseudomonas sp. Through fluorescence, in situ hybridization, and qPCR investigation, the target gene atz was identified to potentially degrade simazine. The results revealed that Rhizobium sp. presented the maximum removal of simazine at 71.2% and mineralization was 38.7%, while the lowest degradation and mineralization were observed in A. lwoffii at 50.4% and 22.4%, respectively. However, this proposed study and molecular insights on the basis of s-triazine-degrading genes could be considered future tools for the degradation of xenobiotics and other organic and inorganic pollutants.

2.2. Microbial Metabolic Pathways of S-Triazine Herbicides

The conversion of s-triazine herbicides into their derivatives leads to the same or more toxicity than their parent compounds [109]. The microbial metabolism of agrochemicals helps alter the toxicity of pesticides via microbial metabolic pathways, which leads them to become wholly degraded into less toxic compounds [110]. Moreover, a complete understanding of s-triazine herbicide biodegradation pathways would help to better utilize these beneficial microbes for more sustainable remediation [111].
A native bacterial strain was isolated from soil and recognized as Leucobacter sp. based on its morphological appearance, physiological appearance, and 16S rDNA gene sequence. The degradation efficiency of the strain Leucobacter sp. JW-1 was tested again with different s-triazine herbicides. The results revealed that this strain completely degraded ametryn and prometryn, whereas 99% simetryn, 41% propazine, 43% atrazine, 28% simazine, 12% terbuthylazine, 10% prometon, and 13% atraton were degraded, at a concentration of 50 mg/L in two days. Moreover, the bacterial degradation mechanism of prometryn was also investigated, which degraded into 2-hydroxypropazine and methanethiol through a new hydrolysis pathway. Further, 2-hydroxypropazine was converted into cyanuric acid via two sequential deamination reactions [53] (Figure 4). To degrade ametryn herbicide into less toxic metabolites, an entomopathogenic fungus, Metarhizium brunneum, was utilized and its degradation efficiency investigated. The results revealed that the fungal strain could tolerate a 100 mg/L concentration of ametryn with the addition of 2% glucose. The results of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis revealed that after a seventeen-day culture of the fungal strain in mineral salt medium, ametryn was degraded into four metabolites: 2-hydroxy atrazine, ethyl hydroxylated ametryn, S-demethylated ametryn, and deethylametryn [112].
For the biodegradation of the s-triazine herbicide terbuthylazine, a mixed bacterial culture, M3-T, was isolated from soil and its degradation efficiency examined in a mineral salt medium and agricultural soil. The results revealed that M3-T efficiently degraded terbuthylazine in a mineral salt medium after three days of culture. Moreover, liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis revealed that terbuthylazine was broken down into five metabolites and categorized into major and minor metabolites. The primary metabolites were converted into hydroxyterbuthylazine and N-t-butylammelide, and the minor metabolites were desethylterbuthylazine, hydroxydesethylterbuthylazine, and cyanuric acid [113]. The capability of soil microbial species to degrade propazine residues in sterilized and unsterilized soil was investigated. The results revealed that after 7–11 days, the soil microbial species degraded 90–94% propazine, respectively, at a concentration of 10 mg/kg. An investigation of the transcript level of the degradative genes AtzB, AtzC, and TrzN revealed that these genes were promoted by propazine and played crucial roles in the degradation mechanism, whereas the results of ultra-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis revealed that propazine breaks down into five significant intermediates: hydroxyl-, methylated-, dimericpropazine, ammeline, and ammelide [114].
A native bacterial strain, FJ1117YT, was screened from a contaminated site through an enrichment culture for the effective bioremediation of simetryn. The consortium was proficient in removing the simetryn herbicide as the sole source of carbon, sulfur, and energy in a mineral salt medium. The strain FJ1117YT was recognized as Rhodococcus sp. based on its morphological and physiological properties and the 16S rRNA gene sequence. Analysis of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance revealed that simetryn was degraded by separating the methylsulfinyl analogue as the primary metabolite and identifying the methylsulfonyl intermediate and the hydroxy analogue as secondary metabolites. The findings showed that the methylthio group was rapidly oxidized and hydrolyzed via bacterial strain. Additionally, this bacterial strain can effectively metabolize other s-triazines herbicides such as ametryn, desmetryn, dimethametryn, and prometryn by comparable degradation pathways [56]. The bacterial strain Pseudomonas sp. ADP is considered a model strain that potentially degraded s-triazine herbicides from the environment. This bacterial strain used especially atrazine and other s-triazine herbicides as a carbon and energy source. The enzymes purified from bacterial strain efficiently converted atrazine into cyanuric acid are encoded by the atzA, atzB, and atzC genes, while cyanuric acid is further divided by atzDEF genes. The herbicide simazine is also degraded by these catabolic enzymes and genes [115].
A new bacterial strain for effective atrazine remediation was isolated from soil by enrichment culture technique and identified as Klebsiella variicola FH-1 based on physiological, morphological, and 16s rDNA sequences. This bacterial strain rapidly grew in a mineral salt medium and utilized atrazine as a sole source of carbon and energy. The optimum degradation efficiency of FH-1 was investigated by various parameters such as temperature, pH, initial concentration of atrazine, and the effect of additional sources in the form of metals such as zinc and copper. Results of the degradation experiment revealed that this bacterial strain in mineral salt medium efficiently degraded 81.5% of atrazine at a temperature of 25 °C, pH 9, and initial concentration of 50 mg/L in 11 days. Among metal ions, due to the utilization of 0.2 mM of zinc, the degradation rate was significantly accelerated by 72.5%, while copper reduced the growth of bacterial strain and decreased the degradation of atrazine. While the results of high-performance liquid chromatography revealed that bacterial strain breakdown atrazine into 2-hydroxyl-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine, 2-hydroxyl-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazine and 4,6-bis(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2(1H)-one. Additionally, PCR analysis revealed that three degrading genes atzC, trzN, and trzD were identified, which were potentially involved in the enzymatic degradation of atrazine [116]. In another study Arthrobacter sp. ZXY-2, Aspergillus niger Y3, Agrobacterium sp. WL-1 and make a composite that potentially degraded atrazine herbicide in a mineral salt medium. The composite was immobilized in biochar and made pellets which 61% more degraded atrazine as compared to free cells. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis revealed that atrazine was divided into metabolites such as hygdoxyatrazine, desethylatrazine, deisopropylatrazine, deisopropyldeethylatrazine, hydroxytrazine, deisopropylhydroxyatrazine, and desethylhydroxyatrazine. The complete degradation pathway is presented in a previous study [117]. Atrazine is highly intractable to biodegradation compared to cyanazine and under methanogenic conditions. The initial disappearance of chemicals may be due to nonbiological processes, and the involvement of biological processes can be achieved through the enrichment culture technique. Degradation of cyanazine and dicamba was observed using this technique, and the degradation intermediates were cyanuric acid and 3,6-dichlorosalicyclic acid, respectively. The initial reaction of dicamba degradation is O-demethylation under methanogenic conditions [118,119].

3. Phytoremediation of S-Triazine Herbicides

The biodegradation of xenobiotics and other emerging pollutants from the natural environment is an emerging issue. Three general methods are extensively applied: indigenous microbial species, bioaugmentation, and phytoremediation [120,121]. The phytoremediation of pollutants is considered adequate, low-cost, environmentally friendly, and more efficient for the degradation of contaminants present in the air, soil, and water [122]. Plants can potentially degrade pesticides, including s-triazine herbicides, in various contaminated locations [123]. Microbial communities placed in the root zone of vegetation provide potential genes and play a pivotal role in biodegradation [124]. The degradation process of pesticides in the soil is a symbiotic reaction between microbial plant species, which enhances soil nutrients [125]. Moreover, vegetation provides a suitable environment for microbial communities that degrade pesticides and enhance the growth of plants [126]. Different plant species are presented in Table 2 that effectively remediate toxic s-triazine residues from soil and water. The phytoremediation of pollutants is divided into four categories: (i) the direct uptake and accumulation of pesticides and subsequent metabolism in plant tissues, an efficient process of pesticide degradation; (ii) the transpiration of volatile organic hydrocarbons by leaves; (iii) the release of exudates that stimulate microbial activity and biochemical transformations in the soil; and (iv) the improvement of mineralization at the root–soil interface by microorganisms [127]. Transgenic plants are very beneficial for the phytoremediation of pesticides. A P450 isoenzyme, CYP1A2, was purified for the remediation of simazine from the Arabidopsis thaliana transgenic plant. The results revealed that CYP1A2 could be used as a potential agent for the mineralization of simazine and converted into less toxic substances, which induced further uptake and enhance plant growth. Moreover, this study further indicated that the application of simazine at a concentration of 250 µmol significantly increased plant growth, while for non-transgenic plants, a concentration of more than 50 µmol damaged the plant and burned it [128]. In another study on the degradation of atrazine, transgenic rice (Oryza sativa) was considered a superior applicant. The results revealed that rice contains cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP1A1, CYP2B6, and CYP2C19, which are encoded by degrading genes and metabolize atrazine into less toxic compounds [129]. To degrade prometryn herbicide through a phytoremediation mechanism, vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.) was investigated. This grass was grown in a hydroponic medium and placed in a greenhouse with prometryn and proper control. The results revealed that vetiver grass potentially degraded the prometryn herbicide and its half-life was noted as 11.5 days. The first-order remediation kinetics was (Ct = 1.8070e − 0.0601t) [130]. In another study on the remediation of prometryn, a greenhouse investigation was conducted, and Canna indica plants were used. The results revealed that this plant provided satisfactory growth at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L and degraded prometryn more efficiently than the control. The half-life of prometryn was reduced in this study by up to 17 days, while the 99% dissipation in the control was 109 days. The combined analysis of prometryn in the solution and plant uptake revealed that it was completely removed by Canna indica within 10–16 days [131].
The proficiency of two types of grass, tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), for the remediation of terbuthylazine was tested in hydroponic media with various concentrations from low to high: 0.06, 0.31, 0.62, and 1.24 mg/L. The results revealed that the grass tall fescue exhibits outstanding growth in hydroponic media and efficiently degrades terbuthylazine. Moreover, this study identified that two enzymes, glutathione S-transferase and ascorbate peroxidase, play a pivotal role in detoxification, and grass was not damaged due to the higher application of herbicide. Meanwhile, adverse effects of terbuthylazine on orchard grass were observed [132]. For the phytoremediation of ametryn herbicide from polluted soil, four different plants (wheat, maize, ryegrass, and alfalfa) were selected and examined for their capability. Besides this, the accumulation percentage of ametryn in various parts of plants, soil enzyme activity, the efficiency of antioxidant and degradation enzymes, and low-molecular-weight organic acids were also investigated. The results revealed that the highest concentration of ametryn was observed in the shoots and roots of wheat and alfalfa, whereas the accumulation percentage was much lower in ryegrass. However, ryegrass showed higher tolerance against the ametryn herbicide and was degraded in polluted soil by plant tissues and enzymes [133]. Metribuzin degradation from soil was achieved at a 5 mg/kg concentration through the amendment of municipal waste compost and sheep manure. A laboratory bioassay was carried out, and the phytotoxicity of metribuzin was investigated on oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). The results of this study revealed that the soil with the amendment of municipal waste compost degraded 88.8% of metribuzin in oilseed rape plants, and sheep manure degraded 72.2%. Moreover, the soil without any amendment of manure for the oilseed rape plant was able to degrade 59.8% of metribuzin. This study concluded that municipal carbon manure was the superior agent enhancing metribuzin degradation in oilseed rape soil [134]. Plants degrade atrazine through three metabolic pathways. The superior pathway of atrazine remediation in some resistant weeds is glutathione conjugation, in which glutathione s-transferase displaces the chlorine atom on the 2-carbon atom of atrazine [135]. The second mechanism is hydrolysis, where the chlorine atom in atrazine is substituted with a hydroxyl group. The third pathway is N-dealkylation, in which cytochrome P450 monooxygenases remove the ethylamino and isopropyl amino side chains [136]. An investigation of the phytoremediation of atrazine from polluted soil by Pennisetum alopecuroides (L.) was conducted. The results revealed that Pennisetum alopecuroides (L.) enhanced the degradation of atrazine by 15.22 to 51.46%, and only a small concentration of atrazine was observed in the roots and shoots of plants [137]. Recently, Pérez et al. [138] studied the degradation of atrazine by Typha latifolia and monitored the physical appearance of plants and the uptake and translocation of atrazine by various parts of plants, and bioaccumulation and removal by selected plants was also investigated. The results revealed that plant tissues degraded atrazine into its derivatives (esethylatrazine and desisopropylatrazine). The detoxification of atrazine was regulated by Typha latifolia via different metabolic pathways. Moreover, the plant study showed that the plants’ weights were reduced after 21 days, and their transpiration rates declined after 28 days. In another study, atrazine was degraded into diaminochlorotriazine and hydroxyatrazine end-products by employing two plant species. This study revealed that both plants rapidly degraded atrazine compared to the control [139]. Recently, Yu et al. [140] studied the degradation of three triazine herbicides (terbuthylazine, ametryn, and atrazine) in maize plants and examined the effect of salicylic acid, which is a natural plant growth regulator, on the detoxification of three herbicides. The results revealed that by applying 6 mg/kg of triazine herbicides, the growth and chlorophyll of maize plants significantly declined, while the membrane permeability was enhanced. By applying salicylic acid at a 5 mg/kg concentration, the triazine herbicides increased phytotoxicity and chlorophyll content and decreased cellular damage in maize plants.
Table 2. Phytoremediation of s-triazine herbicides.
Table 2. Phytoremediation of s-triazine herbicides.
Target S-Triazine HerbicideName of Plant SpeciesStatementReferences
AtrazinePotamogeton crispus
Myriophyllum spicatum
Both species efficiently degraded atrazine up to 90%, and the half-life of atrazine was recorded at 8.60 and 9.72 days, respectively, for both plants.[141]
Lolium perenne
Festuca arundinacea
Hordeum vulgare
Zea mays
All plant species were able to degrade atrazine into their metabolites. The final degradation by plant species was 88.6–99.6%, while in unplanted plots, the degradation of atrazine was 63.1–78.2%.[142]
Panicum virgatumThe results revealed that this plant species detoxifies atrazine into its non-toxic metabolites, which are present in the leaf only.[143]
Lolium perenne L.In this investigation, the electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation of atrazine was tested. The results revealed that plant species degraded atrazine 27% faster as compared to natural attenuation.[144]
Phaseolus vulgaris L.Through the combination of rhizome microbial species and plants, 76.63% of atrazine was degraded at a concentration of 50 mg/L in soil.[145]
Eremanthus crotonoides
Inga striata
Atrazine was degraded by both plant species, and these plants prohibited the leaching of atrazine residues into the underground water system.[146]
Pistia stratiotes
Eichhornia crassipes
Atrazine was spiked in both plants at a concentration of 10–100 µg/L in 5 L pots. The results demonstrated that atrazine residual concentration was less in the plant system as compared to the water solution.[147]
Potamogeton crispus
Myriophyllum spicatum
Both plants absorbed atrazine and converted it into their metabolites. Additionally, chromatography analysis revealed that an equal concentration of atrazine was adsorbed by roots and shoots. [148]
AmetrynAnanas comosusGas chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis revealed that the residues of ametryn were degraded effectively, and 0.002 mg/kg of atrazine in the plant and 0.005 mg/kg in the soil were detected.[149]
Digitaria horizontalisThe results revealed that this plant was able to treat ametryn in avocado fields up to 6 L/ha.[150]
CyanazinePanicum dichotomiflorum
Setaria viridis L.
Zea mays
The results revealed that cyanazine more rapidly metabolizes in Zea mays and a large amount of cyanazine was absorbed by the root system as compared to other plant systems.[151]
Sorghum bicolor L.In this investigation, cyanazine and atrazine were applied and the degradation efficiency of the plant was tested. The results showed that the half-life of cyanazine was 15 days, and in atrazine, 60 days was observed. [152]
Zea maysThe breakdown of cyanazine in corn was investigated and the results revealed that it converts into hydrolysis products such as amide and hydroxy acid.[153]
Bromus inermis Leyss
Elymus junceus Ficsch.
Agropyron intermedium
All the grasses completely removed cyanazine, and a very small concentration of 0.02 mg/kg was detected via gas chromatography.[154]
Typha latifoliaThis plant was investigated for the removal of s-triazine herbicides (atrazine, ametryn, and dimethametryn). The results revealed that the flower of this plant effectively removed residues of all treated pesticides and this method is cost-effective, easy, and ecofriendly.[155]
MetribuzinGlycine max L.The results revealed that the tetraploid of this plant showed great resistance, while diploid plants are highly susceptible. Moreover, tetraploid plants efficiently degraded metribuzin into non-toxic substances.[156]
Triticum turgidum L.The residual concentration of metribuzin was tested via gas chromatography. The results showed that a very small quantity of metribuzin is present in plants, and others are degraded into less toxic substances that are further used by the plant system.[157]
Glycine max L.The results demonstrated that metribuzin was absorbed by the plant system efficiently. About 97% of metribuzin was absorbed by the root system and transformed into its metabolites.[158]
Daucus carota L.The residues of metribuzin and other herbicides were monitored in this plant. The results indicated that the highest uptake was observed by the root system as compared to the leaves and shoots.[159]
Bromus tectorum
Triticum aestivum
The tolerance rate of metribuzin was investigated by both plant species. The results indicated that Bromus tectorum absorbs and transforms a two-times-higher concentration of metribuzin as compared to other plants.[160]
PrometrynPhaseolus vulgaris L.A 10–100 µM concentration of prometryn was applied. The results indicated that the bean plant tolerated prometryn and was a reliable material that could be used for herbicide pollution sensing.[161]
Arachis hypogaeaVarious degradation percentages of prometryn were observed in different parts of plants. The results of gas chromatography revealed that the lowest concentration of metribuzin detected was 0.02 mg/kg.[162]
Angelica acutilobaThe residues of prometryn were degraded more effectively by the root system and the final concentration detected was 0.0368 in dried roots. Meanwhile, after harvesting of the plant, a concentration of prometryn of 0.0464 was observed via gas chromatography and mass spectrometry analysis.[163]
Pontederia cordata L.
Typha latifolia L. and
Cyperus alternifolius L.
These three plants degraded s-triazine herbicides (atrazine, prometryn, and simazine) in more than 25% of the wastewater.[164]
PropazineZea mays
Triticum aestivum
Brassica napus
The results indicated that propazine was effectively degraded by all plants. Six metabolites of propazine were detected in the wheat plant. Through the foliar application of salicylic acid (plant growth regulator), the herbicide rapidly degraded and the growth of the plant increased. [165]
Gossypium hirsutumThe results revealed that a higher concentration of propazine is tolerated by this plant and causes less injury when applied at the pre-emergence stage. This plant uptakes the residue of propazine rapidly.[166]
Zea maysThe results revealed that 96% of propazine was degraded at an initial concentration of 50 mg/L by maize and bacteria-immobilized beads.[77]
SimazineTypha latifoliaThe results revealed that after seven days, the residues of 65%simazine were degraded. This study concluded that this plant is an excellent candidate for the removal of simazine from polluted soil.[167]
Oryza sativaThe human cytochrome P450 CYP1A1 gene was injected into rice plants. The results concluded that human genes make it possible to tolerate simazine and atrazine herbicides and rapidly degrade their residues in culture media and polluted soil.[168]
Canna hybridaThe results revealed that 80% of simazine was degraded after seven days by plants and considered a good candidate for the removal of herbicides.[169]
Zea maysIn corn plants, the absorption and translocation of atrazine and simazine were studied. The results revealed that both herbicides were metabolized into non-toxic products.[170]
Zea maysThe results indicated that simazine was rapidly degraded by the root and shoot of corn plants in polluted soil. [171]
TerbutrynMyriophyllum aquaticumThe uptake translocation and metabolism of atrazine and terbutryn were investigated. The results revealed that a lower concentration of terbutryn was observed in roots and shoots as compared to atrazine. Moreover, plants metabolized both herbicides into less toxic substances. [172]
Gammarus fossarum
Asellus aquaticus
The results indicated that complete degradation of terbutryn was observed in both plant species, and a half-life of terbutryn of 5 h was recorded.[173]
Gossypium hirsutum
Phaseolus vulgaris
Terbutryn was degraded by both plant species and a higher concentration was mineralized by the root system of a plant.[174]
TerbuthylazineLolium multiflorumAn experiment was performed using Lolium multiflorum and terbuthylazine at aqueous concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/L. The plant was able to remove 38%, 42%, and 33% of the initial concentrations, respectively, in 240 h; over this period, the capacity of plants to absorb the herbicide at 0.5 mg L1 increased from 1.58 to 3.50 mg g1 of fresh weight.[175]
Lolium multiflorum L.The ryegrass efficiently degraded terbuthylazine through the activation of glutathione s-transferase and peroxidase enzymes.[176]
Lemna minorThis study concluded that duckweed is suitable for cleaning terbuthylazine-polluted water from the environment and degrading toxic residues through the activation of peroxidase and catalase enzymes.[177]
Typha latifolia L.The plant degraded terbuthylazine into its metabolites in the wetland system. These results concluded that this plant could be used for the remediation of pollutants from wastewater.[178]
Typha latifolia L.This study concluded that the degradation of terbuthylazine showed gradient behavior via the depth of the sediment substrate of wetlands, and its metabolites followed the effect of the biotic and abiotic mechanisms of degradation in the bioreactor substrate.[179]
Phytodegradation summary: This table provides information about specific plant species that are effective in removing or degrading s-triazine herbicides from the soil or water. Phytoremediation is an environmentally friendly approach to remediating contaminated sites using plants. This table also includes details about target compounds and their success rates in the phytoremediation process.

4. Nano-Remediation of S-Triazine Herbicides

The application of nanotechnology in various fields, such as industries, health and medicine, agriculture, environmental issues, food technology, biotechnology, etc., is attracting great interest due to its many advantages [180]. To solve severe environmental and agricultural problems, an extensive range of nanoparticles are synthesized via biological, physical, and chemical methods (Figure 4). Nanomaterials for cleaning up the environment and the removal of various kinds of pollutants in soil, water, and sediments are applied on a laboratory scale and in natural environments and have provided satisfactory results [181]. These nanoparticles are designed with a 1–100 nm dimension [182]. Due to their smaller size, many nanoparticles are equally spread into miniature crevices in the subsurface and stay suspended in groundwater for an extended period [183]. However, due to the extensive range of practical applications of nanoparticles and nanomaterials, they have been considered an efficient agent for removing a wide range of pollutants from soil and water in the real environment, which are impossible to biodegrade [184]. Different nanomaterials and their optimum conditions for removing s-triazine herbicides, especially from polluted water, have been discussed in Table 3.
Ali et al. [185] investigated the absorption of ametryn herbicide using iron nanoparticles as adsorbents. To optimize the degradation of ametryn, a batch experiment was carried out at 30 µg/L, with a contact time of thirty minutes and an adsorbent nanoparticle concentration of 2.5 g/L at a temperature of 20 °C. The residual concentration of ametryn was investigated via high-performance liquid chromatography, and the results revealed that ametryn was significantly removed from wastewater. This study indicated that the sorption method was rapidly performed and considered eco-friendly and lower in cost, and effectively degraded contaminants from water bodies in real environmental conditions. Recently, Cheng et al. [186] studied the degradation of four s-triazine herbicides, atrazine, ametryn, metribuzin, and prometryn, on two typical natural zeolites (clinoptilolite and Fe-mordenite) and two common clays (kaolin and attapulgite) with microporosity in batch experiments. The results indicated that all these s-triazine herbicides highly depend on pH and mineral materials. Moreover, iron zeolites at a concentration of 0.05 mmol/L efficiently increased the sorption process of atrazine, ametryn, and prometryn by enhancing the protonation of s-triazine molecules in the interfacial region between the mineral surface and bulk solution. Atrazine was degraded via the adsorption process using iron nanoparticles. The composite of iron nanoparticles was synthesized, analyzed, and employed for the remediation of atrazine in water. The residual concentration was analyzed via gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. The results indicated that at a temperature of 20 °C, pH 7, and contact time of 30 min, the highest removal of atrazine 95 was recorded at a concentration of 2.5 g/L. This study concluded that this adsorption method is efficient, inexpensive, and rapidly performed for the degradation of atrazine in water samples [187].
Two mesoporous metal oxide-based nanomaterials, aluminum oxide and iron oxide, were synthesized and investigated for the remediation of simazine in an aquatic system. The removal rate was optimized using various parameters such as temperature, pH, contact time, simazine concentration, and sorbent dose. The results revealed that the highest sorption of simazine was recorded at pH 6.5 for aluminum oxide and 3.5 for iron oxide. Moreover, the sorption rate of simazine was higher using iron oxide than aluminum oxide nanocomposites [188].
The removal of simazine was tested using zinc oxide/graphene oxide nanocatalysts under a batch experiment. At pH 2, 30 mmol of nanocatalysts performed efficiently, and a higher concentration of simazine was removed compared to pure zinc oxide, with the removal rate 62% higher than the rate of photolysis [189]. In another study for the removal of atrazine, a novel photocatalyst type of titanium oxide nanoparticle was manufactured using waste material. The remediation study evaluated different parameters, such as the concentration of atrazine, contact time, and catalyst dosages. The results revealed that using a titanium oxide nanocatalyst for the photodegradation of atrazine was an efficient, lower-cost, eco-friendly, simple, and faster technique that can be applied to remove other pollutants [190]. The degradation of the secbumeton s-triazine herbicide from water using a nano-adsorbent was evaluated. The residual concentration was determined via gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. The findings indicated that at an initial concentration of 30 µg/L of secbumeton, pH 7, a temperature of 20 °C, a dose of nano-adsorbent of 2.5 g/L, and a contact time of 30 min, the nano-adsorbent was able to degrade 90% of the herbicide in water. This study showed that this method was very economical and can be efficiently applied to remove contaminants from water on a large scale [191]. For the removal of ametryn from water, natural zeolite nanoparticles were synthesized. The properties of the nanoparticles were evaluated, and a Box–Behnken response surface methodology was applied to investigate all parameters affecting the adsorption mechanism continuously. The results demonstrated that at a temperature of 43 °C, pH 6, 2 g of adsorbent, and a contact time of 2 h, the nanoparticles were able to degrade 64.12% of ametryn in the water samples [192].
Table 3. Activation of nanoparticles and their important roles in the removal of s-triazine herbicides.
Table 3. Activation of nanoparticles and their important roles in the removal of s-triazine herbicides.
S-Triazine HerbicideType of NanoparticlesFunctionReferences
AtrazineFe3O4At optimum conditions, nanoparticles performed well and efficiently degraded 80% of atrazine in an aqueous solution with a short retention time of 20 min. Moreover, atrazine degraded into various intermediate products and finally degraded into less toxic substances.[193]
TiO2 modified with (Au, Cu, and Ni)At an initial concentration of 25 mg/L, titanium nanoparticles were able to degrade 48% of atrazine, while their modification with a gold catalyst performed well and degraded 60% of atrazine at a retention time of 300 min.[194]
CoFe2O4To remove atrazine from wastewater, hybrid cobalt ferrite nanoparticles were synthesized and employed as a highly efficient peroxymonosulfate activator, which rapidly degraded 98.2% of atrazine.[195]
TiO2 modified with Fe+3At an initial concentration of 25 mg/L, modified titanium oxide performs well at pH 11, and following UV radiation, 99% degradation of atrazine was achieved in water samples.[196]
Carbon nanotubesCarbon nanotubes with three different catalysts (pure metallic pallidum, oxide, and silver-coated pallidum) completely removed atrazine from water.[197]
Bi2O3At a neutral pH, initial concentrations of 5 mg/L and 1 g/L of Bi2O3 nanoparticles with an average size of 20 nm were able to degrade 92.1% of atrazine within one hour.[198]
Cu–Cu2OCu–Cu2O nanoparticles were optimized and synthesized via a simple route. The results revealed that complete degradation of atrazine was achieved with 30 min of visible light in water samples.[199]
Fe3O4Mesoporous Fe3O4 nanoparticles were synthesized for the removal of atrazine from water. The results revealed that they showed higher catalytic ozonation activity and their activation level increased by increasing pH, which effectively degraded atrazine from the aqueous solution.[200]
Co3O4/TiO2Co3O4/TiO2 nanoparticles were produced through the simple sol-gel method. Modified nanoparticles perform catalytic reactions, which effectively degrade atrazine from water samples. Moreover, sulfate radicals play a crucial role in the remediation process.[201]
GO-α-γ-Fe2O3Graphene oxide and iron oxide nanoparticles were synthesized for the remediation of atrazine from water. Via an adsorption process, atrazine was rapidly degraded. [202]
AmetrynFeSpherical green iron nanoparticles with a size of 20–70 nm were synthesized by eucalyptus leaf extracts. The results revealed that at a pH range of 2–5 and retention time of 30–240 min, ametryn was effectively degraded from water.[203]
Fe3O4/rGOThe results revealed that at pH 5 and a temperature of 25 °C, using a nanocomposite efficiently degraded 93.61 of prometryn within 70 min in water samples.[204]
FeIn this study, iron nanoparticles at a size of 75 nm were synthesized from the leaves of Tectona Grandis and the authors investigated their degradation efficiency in the water. The results revealed that at optimum conditions, complete degradation was achieved with a retention time of 135 min.[205]
TiO2At an initial concentration of 0.4 g/L with a TiO2 catalyst, complete removal of ametryn was observed within one hour. Ametryn was further degraded into its metabolites in water samples.[206]
GO-Fe3O4Reduced graphene oxide sheets were investigated using dopamine and decorated with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with an average size of 12 nm via a simple co-precipitation method that produced artificial nano-enzymes. The results revealed that nano-enzymes were able to degrade 92% of ametryn.[207]
CyanazineFeAn eco-friendly, less costly, and feasible iron nanoparticle was synthesized for the removal of cyanazine from water. The results revealed that nanoparticles at pH 7, a temperature of 25 °C, and a retention time of 30 min performed efficiently and removed cyanazine.[208]
TiO2The degradation of simazine in polluted water by TiO2 stimulated with solar light was investigated. The results demonstrated that cyanazine and other pesticides rapidly degraded in an aqueous solution.[209]
TiO2For the treatment of organic wastewater, an aggression experiment with TiO2 nanoparticles was carried out. The results indicated that after 12 h, using particles with a size of 84 nm, residues of cyanazine and other organic compounds gradually decreased. [210]
MetribuzinZero-valent iron nanoparticlesThe results demonstrated that zero-valent iron nanoparticles depended on pH, and the degradation of metribuzin was also affected by changing the value of pH. At pH 10, 7, and 4, the degradation of 93.22%, 83.74%, and 70.09% of metribuzin was achieved, respectively, in water samples.[211]
Ag-ZnO The results indicated that upon using 100 mg Ag/ZnO composites, 90% degradation of metribuzin at a concentration of 14 mg/L in 90 min was recorded.[212]
SnS2The results showed that metribuzin was degraded into a deaminometribuzin metabolite by attacking SnS2 nanoparticles. This study concluded that the degradation of metribuzin in water was very slow using this type of nanoparticle. [213]
H-Ag-BMO/TiO2This study concluded that under visible light irradiation, H-Ag-BMO/TiO2 shows excellent photodegradation of 93.7% for metribuzin. [214]
TiO2The mineralization and degradation of metribuzin using titanium oxide nanoparticles was investigated. The results showed that at a concentration of 100 mg/L of metribuzin and 10 mg/L of titanium oxide nanoparticles, 80% degradation was achieved within 300 min of irradiation.[215]
PrometrynPt-TiO2/(Er3+:Y3Al5O12@Ta2O5)The results indicated that Z-scheme P-TET/(OB or Syn)-HAP sonocatalysts were synthesized. To investigate their sonocatalytic efficiency, various parameters such as ultrasonic irradiation time, inorganic oxidants, used times, and trapping agents on the sonocatalytic degradation of prometryn were studied. The best degradation ratio (80.31% based on N computing and 85.07% based on S atom computing) of prometryn could be achieved for 10 mmol/L K2S2O8, 1 g/L P-TET/OB-HAP sonocatalyst and 150 min ultrasonic irradiation.[216]
Al2Si2O5(OH)4-H2SO4A halloysite was modified with H2SO4 for the removal of prometryn from aqueous samples. The results demonstrated that modified halloysite performs excellently at pH 5 and degraded 96% of prometryn.[217]
Fe3O4-TiO2/rGOThe results indicated that at optimum conditions (nanoparticle catalysts 0.5 g/L, concentration of herbicide 15 mg/L, and pH 5), 94% degradation of prometryn was achieved in water samples.[218]
TiO2Hydrogen peroxide was immobilized with titanium oxide nanoparticles, and their degradation efficiency for prometryn in an aqueous solution was investigated. The results indicated that both herbicides were degraded, and the final product, cyanuric acid, was obtained.[219]
Fe3O4/rGOThe results revealed that at pH 5 and a temperature of 25 °C, using nanocomposite efficiently degraded 91.34 of prometryn within 70 min in water samples.[204]
PrometonTiO2The photocatalytic remediation of prometon and other s-triazine herbicides was investigated using titanium oxide nanoparticles under simulated solar light. The results showed that all herbicides were efficiently removed from water samples.[220]
TiO2Hydrogen peroxide was immobilized with titanium oxide nanoparticles, and their degradation efficiency for prometryn and prometon in an aqueous solution was investigated. The results indicated that both herbicides were degraded, and the final product, cyanuric acid, was obtained.[219]
PropazineFeOThe adsorption of propazine in an aqueous solution using iron oxide nanoparticles with modification of carbon nanoparticles was investigated. The results indicated that the modified nanoparticles performed efficiently at low pH.[221]
TiO2The degradation of simazine in polluted water by TiO2 stimulated with solar light was investigated. The results demonstrated that propazine and other s-triazine herbicides rapidly degraded in an aqueous solution.[209]
SimazineTiO2-CuTiO2-Cu nanoparticles were synthesized by anodic oxidation method for the removal of simazine. Findings showed that at optimum conditions 64% photodegradation of simazine was achieved.[222]
Fe3O4/rGOResults revealed that at pH 5 and temperature 25 °C using nanocomposite efficiently degraded 88.55 of simazine within 70 min in water samples.[204]
Au–TiO2The sonophotocatalytic removal of simazine based on Au–TiO2 was investigated. Simazine was degraded into its intermediate products and finally mineralized into less toxic substances.[223]
Fe3O4-TiO2/rGOThe results indicated that at optimum conditions (nanoparticle catalysts 0.5, g/L, concentration of herbicide 15 mg/L, and pH 5) 90% degradation of simazine was achieved in water samples.[218]
TiO2Titanium oxide nanotubes efficiently degraded simazine and converted it into the cyanuric acid final product under UV light.[222]
GO-Fe3O4The findings indicated that the highest removal of simazine, 97%, was achieved in 50 min of sunlight irradiation at optimum conditions (catalyst loading 0.3 g/L, concentration of simazine 0.3 mM, and pH 5).[207]
SimetonFe3O4/rGOThe results revealed that at pH 5 and a temperature of 25 °C, using a nanocomposite efficiently degraded 81.22 of simeton within 70 min in water samples.[201]
Fe3O4-TiO2/rGOThe results indicated that at optimum conditions (nanoparticle catalysts 0.5, g/L, concentration of herbicide 15 mg/L, and pH 5), 92% degradation of simeton was achieved in water samples.[218]
GO-Fe3O4Reduced graphene oxide sheets were investigated using dopamine and decorated with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles with an average size of 12 nm via a simple co-precipitation method, which produced artificial nano-enzymes. The results revealed that nano-enzymes were able to degrade 89% of simeton in water samples.[207]
TerbutrynTiO2The photodegradation of terbutryn using titanium oxide nanotubes as a photocatalysis was studied. The results indicated that 70% of terbutryn was degraded within one hour.[224]
FeSO4-Fe (0)The findings revealed that the FeSO4 and Fe (0) catalytic Fenton oxidation process was able to completely remove terbutryn and other pollutants from the wastewater.[225]
Zero-variant iron nanopowderAt various concentrations of terbutryn (1–1000 µg/L), complete removal of terbutryn was observed at pH 3 and 5 in wastewater using zero-variant iron nanopowder.[226]
N-TiO2The results demonstrated that photocatalytic oxidation and ozonation using the highest tube diameter were efficient in removing almost 100% of terbutryn in aqueous samples.[227]
TerbuthylazineTiO2Via a photocatalytic oxidation process, TiO2 nanoparticles effectively removed terbuthylazine from wastewater samples.[228]
FeSO4-Fe (0)The findings revealed that the FeSO4 and Fe (0) catalytic Fenton oxidation process was able to completely remove terbuthylazine and other pollutants from the wastewater.[225]
TiO2Titanium oxide nanoparticles were immobilized in chitosan glass fiber for the removal of terbuthylazine. Under UV irradiation, the satisfactory removal of terbuthylazine was observed in water samples.[229]
Zero-variant iron nanopowderAt various concentrations of terbutryn (1–1000 µg/L), complete removal of terbutryn was observed at pH 3 and 70% at pH 5 in wastewater using zero-variant iron nanopowder.[226]
TiO2-H2O2The results demonstrated that under visible light and a hydrogen peroxide catalyst, titanium oxide nanoparticles efficiently performed and degraded 100% of terbuthylazine within 180 min.[230]
The removal of three s-triazine herbicides (atrazine, propazine, and prometryn) from water by a thin film nanocomposite membrane containing oleic acid-modified silica nanoparticles was carried out through interfacial polymerization on a polysulfone asymmetric membrane. M-Phenylenediamine with trimesoyl chloride was polymerized to formulate a polyamide layer. Silica nanoparticles with a dimension of 15 nm were magnificently improved by oleic acid and merged into a trimesoyl chloride solution at concentrations ranging from 0 to 0.3 w/v%. The effects of specific physicochemical factors, such as weight and size, hydrophobicity, and the dipole moment of triazine molecules, on the membrane performance were investigated. The results showed that adding oleic acid-adapted silica nanoparticles to the polyamide membranes can increase the rejection and permeate flux. Prometryn and propazine had the highest and lowest rejection, respectively. The maximum rejection was achieved when the concentration of silica nanoparticles in the trimesoyl chloride solution was 0.17 w/v% [231].

5. In Silico Methods Used for Prediction of Toxicological Effects of S-Triazine Herbicides

Predicting the toxicological effects of s-triazine herbicides on different organisms is a critical aspect of assessing the safety of these chemicals. In silico methods, which involve computational techniques, have become increasingly valuable for toxicological predictions due to their cost-effectiveness and ability to complement experimental studies [232]. The most prevalent in silico techniques that are frequently used to forecast the toxicological effects of pesticides are quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analysis; toxicity prediction databases; toxicity pathway analysis; toxicokinetics and pharmacokinetics modeling; molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations; in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADME-Tox) models; and omics-integrated approaches [232,233,234]. QSAR models relate s-triazine herbicides’ chemical composition to their toxicological results in numerous organisms. To forecast toxicity, these models make use of characteristics derived from molecular structure, such as molecular weight, hydrophobicity, and electrical properties [235,236]. Recently, several classes of eight symmetrical triazine derivatives were compared in terms of their antifungal activity toward Aspergillus flavus, an opportunistic fungal pathogenic microorganism that frequently causes crops to become contaminated with aflatoxin, and in the context of their potential application as herbicides in maize, common wheat, barley, and rice crops. In this investigation, various techniques were applied, such as a chemometric pattern recognition approach (hierarchical cluster analysis), the experimental microbiological examination of antifungal activity (agar well-diffusion method), and molecular docking of the triazines in the appropriate enzymes. The primary results of the experiment indicate that the studied triazine derivatives have significant antifungal activity against A. flavus, especially those with acyclic substituents, and five of the eight studied triazines could be used as systematic herbicides, while the other three triazines could be used as contact herbicides. The compounds with acyclic substituents may be more appropriate for utilization in crop protection applications than triazines with cyclic substituents [237]. The (QSAR) technique was used to examine the attributes of four series of synthesized s-triazine derivatives that are important to pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, chromatographic retention and specific physicochemical characteristics linked to pharmacokinetics, such as (ADME-Tox), were connected. Furthermore, a principal component analysis (PCA) based on estimated ADME properties was carried out to confirm any similarities or differences across the series of tested substances. Standard statistical measurements and cross-validation parameters showed the statistical validity of the stated mathematical dependencies between retention parameters and ADME properties. The results of this study indicated that the s-triazine derivatives’ chromatographic retention values could be used in describing and assessing pharmacokinetic features [238]. To summarize, recent improvements in in silico techniques for predicting the toxicological effects of s-triazine herbicides have concentrated on enhancing the precision and thoroughness of toxicity evaluations [239,240]. As computational techniques continue to evolve, they will play an increasingly vital role in toxicological assessments and risk mitigation strategies [241,242].

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

S-triazine ring compounds are widely applied in various sectors as pesticides, resin intermediates, dyes, and explosives. Due to their unwise use, their residues are enormously increasing and causing serious hazards to non-target organisms, especially humans, mammals, pollinators, and predators across the globe. Various methods are applied to remove toxic residues and their intermediates from the environment. However, biodegradation methods play a pivotal role and are considered economic, eco-friendly, and more efficient. In the biodegradation method, various elements, including catabolic genes and enzymes, play a crucial role in catalyzing metabolic pathways and converting them into less toxic substances. More interestingly, in recent times, phytoremediation has been the most efficient technique to clean up various kinds of pollutants, including s-triazine compounds, from soil and water bodies to preserve natural habitats and ecosystems. Plants uptake toxic compounds through their roots, shoots, and leaves and transform them into less toxic or non-toxic compounds, which are further utilized by the plant system and participate in plant growth. In the past two decades, nanotechnology has contributed more efficiently to agriculture and other industrial sectors. Nanomaterials are considered superior agents for the complete removal of persistent pollutants due to their high range of versatility, adaptability, permeability, reusability, and high adsorption surface area. Additionally, the residues of s-triazine compounds induce public health and environmental issues; thus, nanomaterials are necessary for the efficient removal of pollutants in water bodies through adsorption, photocatalysis, sonocatalysis, sorption, ozonation, and biodegradation mechanisms. Instead of these practical approaches, more attention must be paid to the application of omics approaches, bioinformatic tools, database approaches, immobilization techniques, genetic tools such as genetic libraries and genetic fingerprinting, radio respirometry, and micro autoradiography for the complete removal of s-triazine compounds from the polluted environment. Furthermore, artificial intelligence and systematic biological methods are urgently required to inspect covered or invisible functional indigenous microbial communities.

Author Contributions

S.A. wrote the initial draft, conceptualized it, and developed the document. M.C. provided critical feedback and reviewed the manuscript. S.A. and H.W.A. revised the manuscript. S.A. and M.C. supervised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Viegas, C.A.; Silva, V.P.; Varela, V.M.; Correia, V.; Ribeiro, R.; Moreira-Santos, M. Evaluating formulation and storage of Arthrobacter aurescens strain TC1 as a bioremediation tool for terbuthylazine contaminated soils: Efficacy on abatement of aquatic ecotoxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 668, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Seffernick, J.L.; Wackett, L.P. Ancient evolution and recent evolution converge for the biodegradation of cyanuric acid and related triazines. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 1638–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fenoll, J.; Vela, N.; Navarro, G.; Pérez-Lucas, G.; Navarro, S. Assessment of agro-industrial and composted organic wastes for reducing the potential leaching of triazine herbicide residues through the soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 493, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schulz, R.; Bub, S.; Petschick, L.L.; Stehle, S.; Wolfram, J. Applied pesticide toxicity shifts toward plants and invertebrates, even in GM crops. Science 2021, 372, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mnyandu, H.; Mahlambi, P. Optimization and application of QuEChERS and SPE methods followed by LC-PDA for the determination of triazines residues in fruits and vegetables from Pietermaritzburg local supermarkets. Food Chem. 2021, 360, 129818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Elbashir, A.A.; Aboul-Enein, H.Y. Separation and analysis of triazine herbcide residues by capillary electrophoresis. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2015, 29, 835–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xie, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Jia, G.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, Y. Occurrence, distribution and ecological risks of antibiotics and pesticides in coastal waters around Liaodong Peninsula, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 946–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tian, H.; Fu, H.; Xu, C.; Xu, C. Simultaneous determination of three herbicides in honey samples using an aqueous biphasic system coupled with HPLC–MS/MS. Chromatographia 2019, 82, 1571–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Graymore, M.; Stagnitti, F.; Allinson, G. Impacts of atrazine in aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Int. 2001, 26, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McKenzie, M.R.; Templeman, M.A.; Kingsford, M. Detecting effects of herbicide runoff: The use of Cassiopea maremetens as a biomonitor to hexazinone. Aquat. Toxicol. 2020, 221, 105442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ouyang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, X.; Tysklind, M.; Lin, C.; Wang, B.; Xin, M. Occurrence, transportation, and distribution difference of typical herbicides from estuary to bay. Environ. Int. 2019, 130, 104858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Reindl, A.R.; Falkowska, L.; Grajewska, A. Chlorinated herbicides in fish, birds and mammals in the Baltic Sea. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ahmad, S.; Ahmad, H.W.; Bhatt, P. Microbial adaptation and impact into the pesticide’s degradation. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Neuwirthová, N.; Trojan, M.; Svobodová, M.; Vašíčková, J.; Šimek, Z.; Hofman, J.; Bielská, L. Pesticide residues remaining in soils from previous growing season(s)—Can they accumulate in non-target organisms and contaminate the food web? Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 1056–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bhatt, P.; Chaudhary, P.; Ahmad, S.; Bhatt, K.; Chandra, D.; Chen, S. Recent advances in the application of microbial inoculants in the phytoremediation of xenobiotic compounds. In Unravelling Plant-Microbe Synergy; Chandra, D., Bhatt, P., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Korpraditskul, R. Degradation of atrazine by soil bacteria in the stationary phase. J. Pestic. Sci. 1993, 18, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Erickson, L.E.; Lee, K.H.; Sumner, D.D. Degradation of atrazine and related s-triazines. Crit. Rev. Environ. Cont. 1989, 19, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Satsuma, K. Mineralization of s-triazine herbicides by a newly isolated Nocardioides species strain DN36. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 1585–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yue, W.; Chen, M.; Cheng, Z.; Xie, L.; Li, M. Bioaugmentation of strain Methylobacterium sp. C1 towards p-nitrophenol removal with broad spectrum coaggregating bacteria in sequencing batch biofilm reactors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ahmad, S.; Dongming, C.; Zhong, G.; Liu, J. Microbial technologies employed for biodegradation of neonicotinoids in the agroecosystem. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 3510, 759439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmad, S.; Bhatt, P.; Ahmad, H.W.; Cui, D.; Guo, J.; Zhong, G. Enzymes involved in the bioremediation of pesticides. In Industrial Applications of Microbial Enzymes; Bhatt, P., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 133–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wirsching, J.; Pagel, H.; Ditterich, F.; Uksa, M.; Werneburg, M.; Zwiener, C.; Berner, D.; Kandeler, E.; Poll, C. Biodegradation of pesticides at the limit: Kinetics and microbial substrate use at low concentrations. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gangola, S.; Sharma, A.; Joshi, S.; Bhandari, G.; Prakash, O.; Govarthanan, M.; Kim, W.; Bhatt, P. Novel mechanism and degradation kinetics of pesticides mixture using Bacillus sp. strain 3C in contaminated sites. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2022, 181, 104996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Li, F.; Xiao, M.; Lin, D.; Long, X.; Wu, Z. Microbial degradation of pesticide residues and an emphasis on the degradation of cypermethrin and 3-phenoxy benzoic acid: A review. Molecules 2018, 23, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tiwari, N.; Santhiya, D.; Sharma, J.G. Microbial remediation of micro-nano plastics: Current knowledge and future trends. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 115044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Javed, Z.; Tripathi, G.D.; Mishra, M.; Dashora, K. Actinomycetes—The microbial machinery for the organic-cycling, plant growth, and sustainable soil health. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 31, 101893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bharadwaj, A. 2018. Bioremediation of Xenobiotics: An Eco-friendly Cleanup Approach. In Green Chemistry in Environmental Sustainability and Chemical Education; Parmar, V., Malhotra, P., Mathur, D., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, X.; Wang, L.; Ma, F.; Bai, S.; Yang, J.; Qi, S. Pseudomonas sp. ZXY-1, a newly isolated and highly efficient atrazine-degrading bacterium, and optimization of biodegradation using response surface methodology. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 54, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Chauhan, A.; Datta, S.; Wani, A.B.; Singh, N.; Singh, J. Toxicity, degradation and analysis of the herbicide atrazine. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 211–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Karlsson, A.S.; Weihermüller, L.; Tappe, W.; Mukherjee, S.; Spielvogel, S. Field scale boscalid residues and dissipation half-life estimation in a sandy soil. Chemosphere 2016, 145, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, D.; He, S.; Li, X.; Shi, L.; Wang, F.; Yu, S.; Xu, S.; Ju, C.; Fang, H.; Yu, Y. Characterization, genome functional analysis, and detoxification of atrazine by Arthrobacter sp. C2. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Fan, Z.; Liu, F.; Liu, H.; Wang, L.; Wu, H. Soil bacterial community dynamics following bioaugmentation with Paenarthrobacter sp. W11 in atrazine-contaminated soil. Chemosphere 2021, 282, 130976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhu, J.; Fu, L.; Meng, Z.; Jin, C. Characteristics of an atrazine degrading bacterium and the construction of a microbial agent for effective atrazine degradation. Water Environ. J. 2021, 35, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, L.; Liu, Z.; Li, X.; Meng, Z. Application of a simazine degrading bacterium, Arthrobacter ureafaciens XMJ-Z01 for bioremediation of simazine pollution. Water Environ. J. 2020, 34, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Błaszak, M.; Pełech, R.; Graczyk, P. Screening of microorganisms for biodegradation of simazine pollution (Obsolete Pesticide Azotop 50 WP). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 220, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guo, Q.; Wan, R.; Xie, S. Simazine degradation in bioaugmented soil: Urea impact and response of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and other soil bacterial communities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Singh, A.K.; Cameotra, S.S. Influence of microbial and synthetic surfactant on the biodegradation of atrazine. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 2088–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kolekar, P.D.; Phugare, S.S.; Jadhav, J.P. Biodegradation of atrazine by Rhodococcus sp. BCH2 to N-isopropylammelide with subsequent assessment of toxicity of biodegraded metabolites. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 2334–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Khatoon, H.; Rai, J. Optimization studies on biodegradation of atrazine by Bacillus badius ABP6 strain using response surface methodology. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 26, e00459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Lin, M.; Hu, X. Biodegradation of atrazine by Arthrobacter sp. C3, isolated from the herbicide-contaminated corn field. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Evy, A.; Lakshmi, V.; Nilanjana, D.J.J.o.M.; Research, B. Biodegradation of atrazine by Cryptococcus laurentii isolated from contaminated agricultural soil. J. Microb. Biotech. Res. 2012, 2, 450–457. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gao, N.; Zhang, J.; Pan, Z.; Zhao, X.; Ma, X.; Zhang, H. Biodegradation of atrazine by mixed bacteria of Klebsiella variicola strain FH-1 and Arthrobacter sp. NJ-1. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020, 105, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Reyad, A.; Radwan, T.; Ibrahim, W.M.; Essa, A. Biodegradation of atrazine by Ochrobactrum oryzae isolated from the agricultural wastewater. Wulfenia 2014, 21, 286–310. [Google Scholar]
  44. Du, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, Q. Simulation study of atrazine-contaminated soil biodegradation by strain W16. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2011, 11, 1488–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Singh, S.B.; Lal, S.P.; Pant, S.; Kulshrestha, G.J. Degradation of atrazine by an acclimatized soil fungal isolate. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 2008, 43, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lima, D.; Viana, P.; André, S.; Chelinho, S.; Costa, C.; Ribeiro, R.; Sousa, J.; Fialho, A.; Viegas, C. Evaluating a bioremediation tool for atrazine contaminated soils in open soil microcosms: The effectiveness of bioaugmentation and biostimulation approaches. Chemosphere 2009, 74, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yang, X.; Wei, H.; Zhu, C.; Geng, B. Biodegradation of atrazine by the novel Citricoccus sp. strain TT3. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Geed, S.; Prasad, S.; Kureel, M.; Singh, R.; Rai, B. Biodegradation of wastewater in alternating aerobic-anoxic lab scale pilot plant by Alcaligenes sp. S3 isolated from agricultural field. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 214, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jiang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Cao, B.; Deng, S.; Bi, M.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced biodegradation of atrazine by Arthrobacter sp. DNS10 during co-culture with a phosphorus solubilizing bacterium: Enterobacter sp. P1. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 172, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Fernandes, A.F.T.; Braz, V.S.; Bauermeister, A.; Paschoal, J.A.R.; Lopes, N.P.; Stehling, E.G. Degradation of atrazine by Pseudomonas sp. and Achromobacter sp. isolated from Brazilian agricultural soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 130, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. de Oliveira Lopes, R.; Pereira, P.M.; Pereira, A.R.B.; Fernandes, K.V.; Carvalho, J.F.; da Silva de França, A.; Icon, R.H.V.; da Silva Icon, M.; Ferreira-Leitão, V.S. Ferreira-Leitão. Atrazine, desethylatrazine (DEA) and desisopropylatrazine (DIA) degradation by Pleurotus ostreatus INCQS 40310. Biocatal. Biotransformation 2020, 38, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, J.; Pan, D.; Wu, X.; Chen, H.; Cao, H.; Li, Q.X.; Hua, R. Enhanced degradation of prometryn and other s-triazine herbicides in pure cultures and wastewater by polyvinyl alcohol-sodium alginate immobilized Leucobacter sp. JW-1. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, J.; Hua, R.; Lv, P.; Tang, J.; Wang, Y.; Cao, H.; Wu, X.; Li, Q.X. Novel hydrolytic de-methylthiolation of the s-triazine herbicide prometryn by Leucobacter sp. JW-1. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Udiković Kolić, N.; Martin-Laurent, F.; Devers, M.; Petrić, I.; Begonja Kolar, A.; Hršak, D. Genetic potential, diversity and activity of an atrazine-degrading community enriched from a herbicide factory effluent. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 105, 1334–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sandoval-Carrasco, C.A.; Ahuatzi-Chacón, D.; Galíndez-Mayer, J.; Ruiz-Ordaz, N.; Juárez-Ramírez, C.; Martínez-Jerónimo, F. Biodegradation of a mixture of the herbicides ametryn, and 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D) in a compartmentalized biofilm reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 145, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fujii, K.; Takagi, K.; Hiradate, S.; Iwasaki, A.; Harada, N. Biodegradation of methylthio-s-triazines by Rhodococcus sp. strain FJ1117YT, and production of the corresponding methylsulfinyl, methylsulfonyl and hydroxy analogues. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ibrahim, S.A.; Tantawy, M.M.; Seleim, Z.M.; Al-Marsafy, H.T.; Hassanein, A.M. Metabolic detoxification as a viable mechanism for triazine herbicide resistance in ametryn resistant biotype of the fresh water chlorophyte, Scenedesmus vacuolatus. Sci. Res. Essays 2009, 4, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bhaskar, S.; Manu, B.; Sreenivasa, M.Y. Bacteriological synthesis of iron hydroxysulfate using an isolated Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strain and its application in ametryn degradation by Fenton’s oxidation process. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Vaishampayan, P.A.; Kanekar, P.P.; Dhakephalkar, P.K. Isolation and characterization of Arthrobacter sp. strain MCM B-436, an atrazine-degrading bacterium, from rhizospheric soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2007, 60, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Manu, B.; MY, S. Bioleaching of iron from laterite soil using an isolated Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strain and application of leached laterite iron as Fenton’s catalyst in selective herbicide degradation. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0243444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yanze-Kontchou, C.; Gschwind, N. Mineralization of the herbicide atrazine as a carbon source by a Pseudomonas strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 4297–4302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liang, D.; Xiao, C.; Song, F.; Li, H.; Liu, R.; Gao, J. Complete Genome Sequence and Function Gene Identify of Prometryne-Degrading Strain Pseudomonas sp. DY-1. Microorgansims 2021, 9, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gebendinger, N.; Radosevich, M. Inhibition of atrazine degradation by cyanazine and exogenous nitrogen in bacterial isolate M91-3. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 51, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aislabie, J.; Bej, A.K.; Ryburn, J.; Lloyd, N.; Wilkins, A. Characterization of Arthrobacter nicotinovorans HIM, an atrazine-degrading bacterium, from agricultural soil New Zealand. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 52, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Arnold, S.M.; Hickey, W.J.; Harris, R.F.; Talaat, R.E. Integrating chemical and biological remediation of atrazine and S-triazine-containing pesticide wastes. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1996, 15, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Behki, R.; Topp, E.; Dick, W.; Germon, P. Metabolism of the herbicide atrazine by Rhodococcus strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 1955–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Singh, P.; Suri, C.; Cameotra, S.S. Isolation of a member of Acinetobacter species involved in atrazine degradation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 317, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yamazaki, K.-I.; Takagi, K.; Fujii, K.; Iwasaki, A.; Harada, N.; Uchimura, T. Simultaneous biodegradation of chloro-and methylthio-s-triazines using charcoal enriched with a newly developed bacterial consortium. J. Pestic. Sci. 2008, 33, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Harada, N.; Takagi, K.; Fujii, K.; Iwasaki, A. Transformation of methylthio-s-triazines via sulfur oxidation by strain JUN7, a Bacillus cereus species. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38, 2952–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Behloul, M.; Lounici, H.; Abdi, N.; Drouiche, N.; Mameri, N. Adsorption study of metribuzin pesticide on fungus Pleurotus mutilus. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 119, 687–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gopal, M.; Dutta, D.; Jha, S.; Kalra, S.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Das, S.K. Biodegradation of imidacloprid and metribuzin by Burkholderia cepacia strain CH9. Pestic. Res. J. 2011, 23, 36–40. [Google Scholar]
  72. Memić, M.; Vrtačnik, M.; Vatrenjak-Velagić, V.; Grm, K.W. Comparative biodegradation studies of pre-emergence broadleaf and grass herbicides in aqueous medium. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2005, 55, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Huang, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, F.; Song, M. Colonization of Paracoccus sp. QCT6 and enhancement of metribuzin degradation in maize rhizosphere soil. Curr. Microbiol. 2018, 75, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ergüven, G.Ö. Bacillus Subtilis bakterisi ile metribuzin herbisitinin biyoıslahının yapay tarla düzeneğinde araştırılması. Int. J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2019, 5, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pérez-Bárcena, J.F.; Ahuatzi-Chacón, D.; Castillo-Martínez, K.L.; Ruiz-Ordaz, N.; Galíndez-Mayer, J.; Juárez-Ramírez, C.; Ramos-Monroy, O. Effect of herbicide adjuvants on the biodegradation rate of the methylthiotriazine herbicide prometryn. Biodegradation 2014, 25, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chen, X.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, F.; Peng, Q.; Bian, Y. Performance and kinetic of pesticide residues removal by microporous starch immobilized laccase in a combined adsorption and biotransformation process. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, B.; Ni, Y.; Liu, J.; Yan, T.; Zhu, X.; Li, Q.X.; Hua, R.; Pan, D.; Wu, X. Bead-immobilized Pseudomonas stutzeri Y2 prolongs functions to degrade s-triazine herbicides in industrial wastewater and maize fields. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 731, 139183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Pereira, A.R.B.; Pereira, P.M.; da Silva de França, A.; da Silva, M. Propazine degradation by intra-and extracellular enzymes from Pleurotus ostreatus INCQS 40310. Biocatal. Biotransformation 2016, 34, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mougin, C.; Laugero, C.; Asther, M.; Chaplain, V. Biotransformation of s-Triazine Herbicides and Related Degradation Products in Liquid Cultures by the White Rot Fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Pestic. Sci. 1997, 49, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chan, C.Y.; Chan, H.S.; Wong, P.K. Integrated photocatalytic-biological treatment of triazine-containing pollutants. Chemosphere 2019, 222, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Iwasaki, A.; Takagi, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Fujii, K.; Kojima, Y.; Harada, N. Isolation and characterization of a novel simazine-degrading β-proteobacterium and detection of genes encoding s-triazine-degrading enzymes. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wahla, A.Q.; Anwar, S.; Mueller, J.A.; Arslan, M.; Iqbal, S. Immobilization of metribuzin degrading bacterial consortium MB3R on biochar enhances bioremediation of potato vegetated soil and restores bacterial community structure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 390, 121493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Takagi, K.; Fujii, K.; Yamazaki, K.-i.; Harada, N.; Iwasaki, A. Biodegradation of melamine and its hydroxy derivatives by a bacterial consortium containing a novel Nocardioides species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 94, 1647–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shiomi, N.; Ako, M. Biodegradation of melamine and cyanuric acid by a newly-isolated microbacterium strain. Adv. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Radosevich, M.; Traina, S.J.; Tuovinen, O.H. Degradation of binary and ternary mixtures of s-triazines by a soil bacterial isolate. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 1995, 30, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Deshmukh, R.; Khardenavis, A.A.; Purohit, H. Diverse metabolic capacities of fungi for bioremediation. Indian J. Microbiol. 2016, 56, 247–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Sagar, V.; Singh, D. Biodegradation of lindane pesticide by non white-rots soil fungus Fusarium sp. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 1747–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Olicón-Hernández, D.R.; González-López, J.; Aranda, E. Overview on the biochemical potential of filamentous fungi to degrade pharmaceutical compounds. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Esparza-Naranjo, S.B.; da Silva, G.F.; Duque-Castaño, D.C.; Araújo, W.L.; Peres, C.K.; Boroski, M.; Bonugli-Santos, R.C. Potential for the biodegradation of atrazine using leaf litter fungi from a subtropical protection area. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Herrera-Gallardo, B.E.; Guzmán-Gil, R.; Colín-Luna, J.A.; García-Martínez, J.C.; León-Santiesteban, H.H.; González-Brambila, O.M.; González-Brambila, M.M. Atrazine biodegradation in soil by Aspergillus niger. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 99, 932–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pereira, P.M.; Teixeira, R.S.S.; de Oliveira, M.A.L.; da Silva, M.; Ferreira-Leitão, V.S. Optimized atrazine degradation by Pleurotus ostreatus INCQS 40310: An alternative for impact reduction of herbicides used in sugarcane crops. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2013, S12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dhiman, N.; Jasrotia, T.; Sharma, P.; Negi, S.; Chaudhary, S.; Kumar, R.; Mahnashi, M.H.; Umar, A.; Kumar, R. Immobilization interaction between xenobiotic and Bjerkandera adusta for the biodegradation of atrazine. Chemosphere 2020, 257, 127060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cheng, H.; Wang, J.; Tu, C.; Lin, S.; Xing, D.; Hill, P.; Chadwick, D.; Jones, D.L. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar influence simazine decomposition and leaching. Glob. Chang. Biol. Bioenergy 2021, 13, 708–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nishimura, K.; Yamamoto, M.; Nakagomi, T.; Takiguchi, Y.; Naganuma, T.; Uzuka, Y. Biodegradation of triazine herbicides on polyvinylalcohol gel plates by the soil yeast Lipomyces starkeyi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 848–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mollamohammada, S.; Aly Hassan, A.; Dahab, M. Immobilized algae-based treatment of herbicide-contaminated groundwater. Water Environ. Res. 2021, 93, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Mishra, S.; Zhang, W.; Lin, Z.; Pang, S.; Huang, Y.; Bhatt, P.; Chen, S. Carbofuran toxicity and its microbial degradation in contaminated environments. Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Zhou, N.; Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Wu, X. Purification, characterization, and catalytic mechanism of N-Isopropylammelide isopropylaminohydrolase (AtzC) involved in the degradation of s-triazine herbicides. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Jiang, W.; Zhai, W.; Liu, D.; Wang, P. Coexisting antibiotic changes the persistence and metabolic profile of atrazine in the environment. Chemosphere 2021, 269, 129333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Jiang, Z.; Deng, S.; Wang, L.; Hu, Y.; Cao, B.; Lv, J.; Qu, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Nicosulfuron inhibits atrazine biodegradation by Arthrobacter sp. DNS10: Influencing mechanisms insight from bacteria viability, gene transcription and reactive oxygen species production. Environ. Pollu. 2021, 273, 116517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. James, A.; Singh, D.K. Atrazine detoxification by intracellular crude enzyme extracts derived from epiphytic root bacteria associated with emergent hydrophytes. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2021, 56, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Wackett, L.; Sadowsky, M.; Martinez, B.; Shapir, N. Biodegradation of atrazine and related s-triazine compounds: From enzymes to field studies. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Strong, L.C.; Rosendahl, C.; Johnson, G.; Sadowsky, M.J.; Wackett, L.P. Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 metabolizes diverse s-triazine ring compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 5973–5980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Balotra, S.; Newman, J.; Cowieson, N.P.; French, N.G.; Campbell, P.M.; Briggs, L.J.; Warden, A.C.; Easton, C.J.; Peat, T.S.; Scott, C. X-ray structure of the amidase domain of AtzF, the allophanate hydrolase from the cyanuric acid-mineralizing multienzyme complex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 470–480. [Google Scholar]
  104. Devers, M.; El Azhari, N.; Kolic, N.-U.; Martin-Laurent, F. Detection and organization of atrazine-degrading genetic potential of seventeen bacterial isolates belonging to divergent taxa indicate a recent common origin of their catabolic functions. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 273, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Ma, L.; Chen, S.; Yuan, J.; Yang, P.; Liu, Y.; Stewart, K. Rapid biodegradation of atrazine by Ensifer sp. strain and its degradation genes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 116, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sajjaphan, K.; Shapir, N.; Wackett, L.P.; Palmer, M.; Blackmon, B.; Tomkins, J.; Sadowsky, M. Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 atrazine catabolism genes trzN, atzB, and atzC are linked on a 160-kilobase region and are functional in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4402–4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Guo, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wan, R.; Xie, S. Impacts of carbon sources on simazine biodegradation by Arthrobacter strain SD3-25 in liquid culture and soil microcosm. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 89, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fajardo, C.; Saccà, M.L.; Gibello, A.; Martinez-Iñigo, M.J.; Nande, M.; Lobo, C.; Martin, M. Assessment of s-triazine catabolic potential in soil bacterial isolates applying atz genes as functional biomarkers. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 3385–3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Li, Z.J.E.; Safety, E. Improving screening model of pesticide risk assessment in surface soils: Considering degradation metabolites. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 222, 112490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Hassaan, M.A.; El Nemr, A. Pesticides pollution: Classifications, human health impact, extraction and treatment techniques. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2020, 46, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jaffar, S.; Ahmad, S.; Lu, Y. Contribution of insect gut microbiota and their associated enzymes in insect physiology and biodegradation of pesticides. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 979383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Szewczyk, R.; Kuśmierska, A.; Bernat, P. Ametryn removal by Metarhizium brunneum: Biodegradation pathway proposal and metabolic background revealed. Chemosphere 2018, 190, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jurina, T.; Terzić, S.; Ahel, M.; Stipičević, S.; Kontrec, D.; Kurtanjek, Ž.; Udiković-Kolić, N. Catabolism of terbuthylazine by mixed bacterial culture originating from s-triazine-contaminated soil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 7223–7232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jiang, C.; Lu, Y.C.; Xu, J.Y.; Song, Y.; Song, Y.; Zhang, S.H.; Ma, L.Y.; Lu, F.F.; Wang, Y.K.; Yang, H. Activity, biomass and composition of microbial communities and their degradation pathways in exposed propazine soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 145, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hernández, M.; Morgante, V.; Flores, C.; Villalobos, P.; González, M.; Miralles, P.; Dinamarca, A.; Seeger, M. Modern approaches for the study of s-triazine herbicide bioremediation in agricultural soils. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2008, 8, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, J.; Liang, S.; Wang, X.; Lu, Z.; Sun, P.; Zhang, H.; Sun, F. Biodegradation of atrazine by the novel Klebsiella variicola strain FH-1. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yu, T.; Wang, L.; Ma, F.; Wang, Y.; Bai, S. A bio-functions integration microcosm: Self-immobilized biochar-pellets combined with two strains of bacteria to remove atrazine in water and mechanisms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Lin, C.; Gu, J.-G.; Qiao, C.; Duan, S.; Gu, J.-D. Degradability of atrazine, cyanazine, and dicamba in methanogenic enrichment culture microcosms using sediment from the Pearl River of Southern China. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2006, 42, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gu, J.-G.; Qiao, C.; Gu, J.-D. Biodegradation of the herbicides atrazine, cyanazine, and dicamba by methanogenic enrichment cultures from selective soils of China. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2003, 71, 924–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Chen, X.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, F.; Peng, Q.; Teng, P. Removal of nine pesticide residues from water and soil by biosorption coupled with degradation on biosorbent immobilized laccase. Chemosphere 2019, 233, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Santos, E.; Pires, F.R.; Icon, A.D.F.; Filho, F.B.E.; da Rocha Junior, P.R. Phytoremediation and natural attenuation of sulfentrazone: Mineralogy influence of three highly weathered soils. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2019, 21, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wei, Z.; Van Le, Q.; Peng, W.; Yang, Y.; Yang, H.; Gu, H.; Lam, S.S.; Sonne, C. A review on phytoremediation of contaminants in air, water and soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Eevers, N.; White, J.C.; Vangronsveld, J.; Weyens, N. Bio-and phytoremediation of pesticide-contaminated environments: A review. Adv. Bot. Res. 2017, 83, 277–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rohrbacher, F.; St-Arnaud, M. Root exudation: The ecological driver of hydrocarbon rhizoremediation. Agronomy 2016, 6, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Siddiqui, J.A.; Khan, M.M.; Bamisile, B.S.; Hafeez, M.; Qasim, M.; Rasheed, M.T.; Rasheed, M.A.; Ahmad, S.; Shahid, M.I.; Xu, Y. Role of insect gut microbiota in pesticide degradation: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 870462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Feng, N.-X.; Yu, J.; Zhao, H.-M.; Cheng, Y.-T.; Mo, C.-H.; Cai, Q.-Y.; Li, Y.-W.; Li, H.; Wong, M.-H. Efficient phytoremediation of organic contaminants in soils using plant–endophyte partnerships. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 583, 352–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Schnoor, J.L.; Light, L.A.; McCutcheon, S.C.; Wolfe, N.L.; Carreia, L.H. Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 318A–323A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Azab, E.; Hegazy, A.K.; El-Sharnouby, M.E.; Abd Elsalam, H.E. Phytoremediation of the organic Xenobiotic simazine by p450-1a2 transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2016, 18, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Kawahigashi, H.; Hirose, S.; Ohkawa, H.; Ohkawa, Y.J. Transgenic rice plants expressing human P450 genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism for phytoremediation. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 15, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Sun, S.; Li, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Hua, Y.; Datta, R.; Dan, Y.; Lv, P.; Sarkar, D. Uptake of 2,4-bis (Isopropylamino)-6-methylthio-s-triazine by vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.) from hydroponic media. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2016, 96, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Sun, S.; Lv, P.; Datta, R.; Ni, J.; Su, Y.; Sarkar, D.; Zheng, Y. Uptake of 2, 4-bis (Isopropylamino)-6-methylthio-s-triazine by Canna indica. J. Environ. Biol. 2019, 40, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Buono, D.D.; Pannacci, E.; Bartucca, M.L.; Nasini, L.; Proietti, P.; Tei, F. Use of two grasses for the phytoremediation of aqueous solutions polluted with terbuthylazine. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2016, 18, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Liu, Y.; Ma, L.Y.; Lu, Y.C.; Jiang, S.S.; Wu, H.J.; Yang, H. Comprehensive analysis of degradation and accumulation of ametryn in soils and in wheat, maize, ryegrass and alfalfa plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 140, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Mehdizadeh, M.; Izadi-Darbandi, E.; Naseri Pour Yazdi, M.T.; Rastgoo, M.; Malaekeh-Nikouei, B.; Nassirli, H. Impacts of different organic amendments on soil degradation and phytotoxicity of metribuzin. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2019, 8, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lamoureux, G.L.; Shimabukuro, R.; Swanson, H.; Frear, D. Metabolism of 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine (atrazine) in excised sorghum leaf sections. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1970, 18, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Hamilton, R.H.; Moreland, D.E. Simazine: Degradation by corn seedlings. Science 1962, 135, 373–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Lin, Z.; Zhen, Z.; Chen, C.; Li, Y.; Luo, C.; Zhong, L.; Hu, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, Y. Rhizospheric effects on atrazine speciation and degradation in laterite soils of Pennisetum alopecuroides (L.) Spreng. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 12407–12418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Pérez, D.J.; Doucette, W.J.; Moore, M.T. Atrazine uptake, translocation, bioaccumulation and biodegradation in cattail (Typha latifolia) as a function of exposure time. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Li, H.; Qu, M.; Lu, X.; Chen, Z.; Guan, S.; Du, H.; Zhu, D. Evaluation of the potential of Potamogeton crispus and Myriophyllum spicatum on phytoremediation of atrazine. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2019, 99, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yu, Q.Q.; Lu, F.F.; Ma, L.Y.; Yang, H.; Song, N.H. Residues of Reduced Herbicides Terbuthylazine, Ametryn, and Atrazine and Toxicology to Maize and the Environment through Salicylic Acid. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 27396–27404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Qu, M.; Li, N.; Li, H.; Yang, T.; Liu, W.; Yan, Y.; Feng, X.; Zhu, D. Phytoextraction and biodegradation of atrazine by Myriophyllum spicatum and evaluation of bacterial communities involved in atrazine degradation in lake sediment. Chemosphere 2018, 209, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sánchez, V.; López-Bellido, F.J.; Cañizares, P.; Rodríguez, L. Assessing the phytoremediation potential of crop and grass plants for atrazine-spiked soils. Chemosphere 2017, 185, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Murphy, I.J.; Coats, J.R. The capacity of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) to degrade atrazine in a phytoremediation setting. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2011, 30, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sánchez, V.; López-Bellido, J.; Rodrigo, M.A.; Rodríguez, L. Enhancing the removal of atrazine from soils by electrokinetic-assisted phytoremediation using ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Chemosphere 2019, 232, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Madariaga-Navarrete, A.; Rodríguez-Pastrana, B.R.; Villagómez-Ibarra, J.R.; Acevedo-Sandoval, O.A.; Perry, G.; Islas-Pelcastre, M.J. Bioremediation model for atrazine contaminated agricultural soils using phytoremediation (using Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and a locally adapted microbial consortium. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 2017, 52, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Aguiar, L.M.; Dos Santos, J.B.; Barroso, G.M.; Ferreira, E.A.; Cabral, C.M.; Costa, M.R.; Vieira, E.R.D.; Zanuncio, J.C. Phytoremediation by Eremanthus crotonoides and Inga striata decay atrazine and clomazone residues in the soil. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2020, 22, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. dos Santos, N.M.C.; Monteiro, P.G.; Ferreira, E.A.; Alencar, B.T.B.; Cabral, C.M.; dos Santos, J.B. Use of Eichhornia crassipes and Pistia stratiotes for environmental services: Decontamination of aquatic environments with atrazine residues. Aquat. Bot. 2022, 176, 103470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Qu, M.; Mei, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhao, J.; Liu, W.; Li, S.; Huang, F.; Zhu, D. Transcriptomic profiling of atrazine phytotoxicity and comparative study of atrazine uptake, movement, and metabolism in Potamogeton crispus and Myriophyllum spicatum. Environ. Res. 2021, 194, 110724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Li, X.-S.; Lu, Z.-X.; Lin, M.-Z. Ametryn residues and its degradation dynamics in pineapple and soil. Chin. J. Eco. Agric. 2006, 14, 138–140. [Google Scholar]
  150. Machi, A.; Arthur, P.; Ferrari, L.; Arthur, V. Efficiency of ametryn herbicide irradiated on different weeds in an orchard of avocado. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015, 9, 205–210. [Google Scholar]
  151. Kern, A.; Meggitt, W.; Penner, D. Uptake, movement, and metabolism of cyanazine in fall panicum, green foxtail, and corn. Weed Sci. 1975, 23, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. De Billot, M.I.C.; Nel, P. Soil, Recovery of grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolar (L.) Moench] from atrazine and cyanazine phytotoxicity. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil 1985, 2, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Beynon, K.; Stoydin, G.; Wright, A.N. The breakdown of the triazine herbicide cyanazine in soils and maize. Pestic. Sci. 1972, 3, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Cessna, A.J.; Darwent, A.L.; Moyer, J.R.; Cole, D.E. Dissipation of residues of MCPA and cyanazine in three forage grasses following post-emergence application as a mixture in the establishment year. Pestic. Sci. 1994, 40, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Tolcha, T.; Gemechu, T.; Megersa, N. Flower of Typha latifolia as a low-cost adsorbent for quantitative uptake of multiclass pesticide residues from contaminated waters. S. Afr. J. Chem. 2020, 73, 22–29. [Google Scholar]
  156. Abusteit, E.O.; Corbin, F.T.; Schmitt, D.P.; Burton, J.W.; Worsham, A.D.; Thompson, L.J. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of metribuzin in diploid and tetraploid soybean (Glycine max) plants and cell cultures. Weed Sci. 1985, 33, 618–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Garcia-Baudin, J.; Villarroya, M.; Chueca, M.; Tadeo, J. Different tolerance of two cultivars of Triticum turgidum L. to metribuzin. Chemosphere 1990, 21, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Frear, D.; Swanson, H.; Mansager, E. Alternate pathways of metribuzin metabolism in soybean: Formation of N-glucoside and homoglutathione conjugates. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 1985, 23, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Šuk, J.; Hamouzová, K.; Hajšlová, J.; Jursík, M. Dynamics of herbicides degradation in carrot (Daucus carota L.) roots and leaves. Plant Soil Environ. 2021, 67, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Devlin, D.L.; Gealy, D.R.; Morrow, L.A. Differential absorption and translocation of metribuzin by downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 1987, 35, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Boulahia, K.; Carol, P.; Planchais, S.; Abrous-Belbachir, O. Phaseolus vulgaris L. seedlings exposed to prometryn herbicide contaminated soil trigger an oxidative stress response. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3150–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chen, J.; Zhao, K. Degradation dynamics and implementation advice of prometryn in peanut. J. Food Saf. Qual. 2018, 9, 3226–3230. [Google Scholar]
  163. Wu, M.; Wang, L.; Fu, M. Weeding effect of prometryn and its residue analysis in root of Angelica acutiloba (Sieb. et Zucc.) Kitag. J. Fujian Agric. For. Univ. 2010, 39, 347–350. [Google Scholar]
  164. Kirumba, G.; Ge, L.; Wei, D.; Xu, C.; He, Y.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, C.; Mao, F. The role of a hybrid phytosystem in landscape water purification and herbicides removal. Water Sci. Technol. 2015, 72, 2052–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Zhang, J.J.; Wang, Y.K.; Zhou, J.H.; Xie, F.; Guo, Q.N.; Lu, F.F.; Jin, S.F.; Zhu, H.M.; Yang, H. Reduced phytotoxicity of propazine on wheat, maize and rapeseed by salicylic acid. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 162, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Kendig, J.; Nichols, R.; Ohmes, G.J.P.H.P. Tolerance of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings to preemergence and postemergence herbicides with four modes of action. Plant Health Prog. 2007, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Wilson, P.; Whitwell, T.; Klaine, S. Metalaxyl and simazine toxicity to and uptake by Typha latifolia. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 39, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Kawahigashi, H.; Hirose, S.; Ohkawa, H.; Ohkawa, Y.J. Transgenic rice plants expressing human CYP1A1 remediate the triazine herbicides atrazine and simazine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 8557–8564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Wilson, P.C.; Whitwell, T.; Klaine, S. Phytotoxicity, uptake, and distribution of [14C] simazine in Canna hybrida ‘Yellow King Humbert’. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1999, 18, 1462–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Montgomery, M.; Freed, V.H. The uptake, translocation and metabolism of simazine and atrazine by corn plants. Weeds 1961, 9, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Burauel, B.; Führ, F. The enhanced mineralization of simazine and bentazon in soil after plant uptake. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde 1988, 151, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Turgut, C. Uptake and modeling of pesticides by roots and shoots of parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum). Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. Int. 2005, 12, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Richter, S.; Nagel, R. Bioconcentration, biomagnification and metabolism of 14C-terbutryn and 14C-benzo [a] pyrene in Gammarus fossarum and Asellus aquaticus. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Rubin, B.; Eshel, Y. Absorption and translocation of terbutryn and fluometuron in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and snapbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 1977, 25, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Bravin, M.N.; Michaud, A.M.; Larabi, B.; Hinsinger, P. RHIZO test: A plant-based biotest to account for rhizosphere processes when assessing copper bioavailability. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 3330–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Mimmo, T.; Bartucca, M.L.; Del Buono, D.; Cesco, S. Italian ryegrass for the phytoremediation of solutions polluted with terbuthylazine. Chemosphere 2015, 119, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Panfili, I.; Bartucca, M.L.; Del Buono, D. The treatment of duckweed with a plant biostimulant or a safener improves the plant capacity to clean water polluted by terbuthylazine. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Papadopoulos, N.; Zalidis, G. The use of Typha Latifolia L. in constructed wetland microcosms for the remediation of herbicide Terbuthylazine. Environ. Process. 2019, 6, 985–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Papadopoulos, N.G.; Takavakoglou, V.; Gikas, E.; Tsarbopoulos, A.; Zalidis, G. Transport and dissipation study of the herbicide terbuthylazine and its major metabolites in wetland sediment substrates planted with Typha latifolia L. Desalination Water Treat. 2012, 39, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hussain, A.; Rehman, F.; Rafeeq, H.; Waqas, M.; Asghar, A.; Afsheen, N.; Rahdar, A.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M. In-situ, Ex-situ, and nano-remediation strategies to treat polluted soil, water, and air—A review. Chemosphere 2022, 289, 133252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Galdames, A.; Ruiz-Rubio, L.; Orueta, M.; Sánchez-Arzalluz, M.; Vilas-Vilela, J.L. Zero-valent iron nanoparticles for soil and groundwater remediation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Thuesombat, P.; Hannongbua, S.; Akasit, S.; Chadchawan, S. Effect of silver nanoparticles on rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. KDML 105) seed germination and seedling growth. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 104, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Galdames, A.; Mendoza, A.; Orueta, M.; de Soto García, I.; Sánchez, M.; Virto, I.; Vilas, J. Development of new remediation technologies for contaminated soils based on the application of zero-valent iron nanoparticles and bioremediation with compost. Resour. Effic. Technol. 2017, 3, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Bhavya, G.; Belorkar, S.A.; Mythili, R.; Geetha, N.; Shetty, H.S.; Udikeri, S.S.; Jogaiah, S. Remediation of emerging environmental pollutants: A review based on advances in the uses of eco-friendly biofabricated nanomaterials. Chemosphere 2021, 275, 129975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Ali, I.; AL-Othman, Z.A.; Alwarthan, A. Green synthesis of functionalized iron nano particles and molecular liquid phase adsorption of ametryn from water. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 221, 1168–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Cheng, H.; Zhang, R.; Chen, G. Sorption of four s-triazine herbicides on natural zeolite and clay mineral materials with microporosity. Fundam. Res. 2021, 1, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Ali, I.; Alothman, Z.; Al-Warthan, A. Sorption, kinetics and thermodynamics studies of atrazine herbicide removal from water using iron nano-composite material. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Addorisio, V.; Pirozzi, D.; Esposito, S.; Sannino, F. Decontamination of waters polluted with simazine by sorption on mesoporous metal oxides. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 196, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Flores, K.; Valdes, C.; Ramirez, D.; Eubanks, T.; Lopez, J.; Hernandez, C.; Alcoutlabi, M.; Parsons, J. The effect of hybrid zinc oxide/graphene oxide (ZnO/GO) nano-catalysts on the photocatalytic degradation of simazine. Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Yola, M.L.; Eren, T.; Atar, N. A novel efficient photocatalyst based on TiO2 nanoparticles involved boron enrichment waste for photocatalytic degradation of atrazine. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 250, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Ali, I.; Al-Othman, Z.A.; Al-Warthan, A. Removal of secbumeton herbicide from water on composite nanoadsorbent. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 10409–10421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Khodayar, M.J.; Namdar, F.; Hojati, S.; Landi, A.; Nazarikhorasgani, Z.; Alamolhoda, S. Removal of ametryn from aqueous solutions with zeolite nanoparticles optimized using the Box-Behnken design. Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod. 2016, 11, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Keyikoglu, R.; Karatas, O.; Khataee, A.; Kobya, M.; Can, O.T.; Soltani, R.D.C.; Isleyen, M. Peroxydisulfate activation by in-situ synthesized Fe3O4 nanoparticles for degradation of atrazine: Performance and mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 247, 116925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Santacruz-Chávez, J.A.; Oros-Ruiz, S.; Prado, B.; Zanella, R. Photocatalytic degradation of atrazine using TiO2 superficially modified with metallic nanoparticles. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 3055–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Li, X.; Liu, X.; Lin, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Fan, G.; Ma, J. Cobalt ferrite nanoparticles supported on drinking water treatment residuals: An efficient magnetic heterogeneous catalyst to activate peroxymonosulfate for the degradation of atrazine. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 367, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Shamsedini, N.; Dehghani, M.; Nasseri, S.; Baghapour, M.A. Photocatalytic degradation of atrazine herbicide with Illuminated Fe+3-TiO2 Nanoparticles. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2017, 15, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Vijwani, H.; Nadagouda, M.; Mukhopadhyay, S. Robust nanocatalyst membranes for degradation of atrazine in water. J. Water Process. Eng. 2018, 25, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Sudrajat, H.; Sujaridworakun, P. Correlation between particle size of Bi2O3 nanoparticles and their photocatalytic activity for degradation and mineralization of atrazine. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 242, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Mkhalid, I.; Shawky, A. Cu-supported Cu2O nanoparticles: Optimized photodeposition enhances the visible light photodestruction of atrazine. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 853, 157040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Zhu, S.; Dong, B.; Yu, Y.; Bu, L.; Deng, J.; Zhou, S. Heterogeneous catalysis of ozone using ordered mesoporous Fe3O4 for degradation of atrazine. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 328, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Cai, H.; Li, J.; Yin, H.; Yao, G.; Lai, B. Degradation of atrazine in aqueous solution through peroxymonosulfate activated by Co-modified nano-titanium dioxide. Water Environ. Res. 2020, 92, 1363–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Andrade, M.B.; Santos, T.R.; Fernandes Silva, M.; Vieira, M.F.; Bergamasco, R.; Hamoudi, S. Graphene oxide impregnated with iron oxide nanoparticles for the removal of atrazine from the aqueous medium. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2653–2670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Sangami, S.; Manu, B. Synthesis of Green Iron Nanoparticles using Laterite and their application as a Fenton-like catalyst for the degradation of herbicide Ametryn in water. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2017, 8, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Boruah, P.K.; Sharma, B.; Hussain, N.; Das, M.R. Magnetically recoverable Fe3O4/graphene nanocomposite towards efficient removal of triazine pesticides from aqueous solution: Investigation of the adsorption phenomenon and specific ion effect. Chemopshere 2017, 168, 1058–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Sangami, S.; Manu, B. Catalytic efficiency of laterite-based FeNPs for the mineralization of mixture of herbicides in water. Environ. Technol. 2018, 40, 2671–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Cavalcante, R.P.; de Oliveira, D.M.; da Silva, L.d.M.; Gimenez, J.; Esplugas, S.; de Oliveira, S.C.; Dantas, R.F.; Sans, C.; Junior, A.M. Evaluation of the main active species involved in the TiO2 photocatalytic degradation of ametryn herbicide and its by-products. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Boruah, P.K.; Darabdhara, G.; Das, M.R. Polydopamine functionalized graphene sheets decorated with magnetic metal oxide nanoparticles as efficient nanozyme for the detection and degradation of harmful triazine pesticides. Chemosphere 2021, 268, 129328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Ali, I.; Alharbi, O.M.; Alothman, Z.A.; Alwarthan, A. Facile and eco-friendly synthesis of functionalized iron nanoparticles for cyanazine removal in water. Colloids Surf. B 2018, 171, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Konstantinou, I.K.; Sakellarides, T.M.; Sakkas, V.A.; Albanis, T.A. Photocatalytic degradation of selected s-triazine herbicides and organophosphorus insecticides over aqueous TiO2 suspensions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Lee, J.; Bartelt-Hunt, S.L.; Li, Y. Development of Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships for Nanoparticle Titanium Dioxide Aggregation in the Presence of Organic Contaminants. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2018, 35, 918–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. K’Owino Isaac, O.; Masika, K.; Okello, V.A. Kinetics of degradation of metribuzin in aqueous solution using zero valent iron nanoparticles. Al-Nahrain J. Sci. 2018, 21, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Xu, Y.; Wu, S.; Li, X.; Meng, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Han, Y. Ag nanoparticle-functionalized ZnO micro-flowers for enhanced photodegradation of herbicide derivatives. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2017, 679, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Oreggioni, D.; Pérez Parada, A.; Aguiar, I.; Colazzo, M.; Pareja, L.; De León, M.A.; Pereira, H.B.; Pérez Barthaburu, M.E. Sulfur precursor and citric acid effect on SnS2 nanoparticles and their influence on the photodegradation activity of selected organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 18234–18245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Yin, J.; Xing, Z.; Kuang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Zhou, W. Dual oxygen vacancy defects-mediated efficient electron-hole separation via surface engineering of Ag/Bi2MoO6 nanosheets/TiO2 nanobelts ternary heterostructures. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 78, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Antonopoulou, M.; Konstantinou, I. Photocatalytic treatment of metribuzin herbicide over TiO2 aqueous suspensions: Removal efficiency, identification of transformation products, reaction pathways and ecotoxicity evaluation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2014, 294, 110–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Li, G.; Cao, Y.; Yi, L.; Wang, J.; Song, Y. Construction of Z-scheme Pt-TiO2/(Er3+:Y3Al5O12@Ta2O5)/HAP and its application in sonocatalytic degradation of prometryn and disinfection of Escherichia coli. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2020, 95, 1756–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Grabka, D.; Raczyńska-Żak, M.; Czech, K.; Słomkiewicz, P.M.; Jóźwiak, M.A. Modified halloysite as an adsorbent for prometryn from aqueous solutions. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 114, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Boruah, P.K.; Das, M.R. Dual responsive magnetic Fe3O4-TiO2/graphene nanocomposite as an artificial nanozyme for the colorimetric detection and photodegradation of pesticide in an aqueous medium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 385, 121516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Borio, O.; Gawlik, B.; Bellobono, I.; Muntau, H. Photooxidation of prometryn and prometon in aqueous solution by hydrogen peroxide on photocatalytic membranes immobilising titanium dioxide. Chemosphere 1998, 37, 975–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Pelizzetti, E.; Maurino, V.; Minero, C.; Carlin, V.; Tosato, M.L.; Pramauro, E.; Zerbinati, O. Photocatalytic degradation of atrazine and other s-triazine herbicides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1990, 24, 1559–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Eshete, M.; Bowleg, J.; Perales, S.G.; Okunrobo, M.; Watkins, D.; Spencer, H. Adsorption of propazine, simazine and bisphenol A on the surface of nanoparticles of iron oxide nanoparticles of carbon and metallic oxides. J. Environ. Prot. 2018, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Meriam Suhaimy, S.H.; Abd Hamid, S.B.; Lai, C.W.; Hasan, M.; Johan, M.R. TiO2 nanotubes supported Cu nanoparticles for improving photocatalytic degradation of simazine under UV illumination. Catalysts 2016, 6, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Sathishkumar, P.; Mangalaraja, R.V.; Mansilla, H.D.; Gracia-Pinilla, M.; Anandan, S. Sonophotocatalytic (42 kHz) degradation of Simazine in the presence of Au–TiO2 nanocatalysts. Appl. Catal. B 2014, 160, 692–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Salmerón, I.; Sharma, P.; Polo-López, M.; Tolosana, A.; McMichael, S.; Oller, I.; Byrne, J.; Fernández-Ibáñez, P. Electrochemically assisted photocatalysis for the simultaneous degradation of organic micro-contaminants and inactivation of microorganisms in water. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 147, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Goswami, A.; Jiang, J.-Q. Comparative performance of catalytic fenton oxidation with zero-valent iron (Fe (0)) in comparison with ferrous sulphate for the removal of micropollutants. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Goswami, A.; Jiang, J.-Q.; Petri, M. Treatability of five micro-pollutants using modified Fenton reaction catalysed by zero-valent iron powder (Fe (0)). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Gomes, J.; Roccamante, M.; Contreras, S.; Medina, F.; Oller, I.; Martins, R.C. Scale-up impact over solar photocatalytic ozonation with benchmark-P25 and N-TiO2 for insecticides abatement in water. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Kanan, S.; Moyet, M.A.; Arthur, R.B.; Patterson, H.H. Recent advances on TiO2-based photocatalysts toward the degradation of pesticides and major organic pollutants from water bodies. Catal. Rev. 2020, 62, 1–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Le Cunff, J.; Tomašić, V.; Wittine, O. Photocatalytic degradation of the herbicide terbuthylazine: Preparation, characterization and photoactivity of the immobilized thin layer of TiO2/chitosan. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2015, 309, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Tang, J.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, T.; Yang, S. Degradation of terbuthylazine by TiO2 visible photocatalysis with electro-generated Fenton reagent assistance. China Environ. Sci. 2016, 36, 3304–3310. [Google Scholar]
  231. Rakhshan, N.; Pakizeh, M. Removal of triazines from water using a novel OA modified SiO2/PA/PSf nanocomposite membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 147, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Chang, C.M.; Chang, C.W.; Wu, F.W.; Chang, L.; Liu, T.C. In Silico Ecotoxicological Modeling of Pesticide Metabolites and Mixtures. In Ecotoxicological QSARs; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 561–589. [Google Scholar]
  233. Sasikala, S.; Minu Jenifer, M.; Velavan, K.; Sakthivel, M.; Sivasamy, R.; Fenwick Antony, E.R. Predicting the relationship between pesticide genotoxicity and breast cancer risk in South Indian women in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Qiao, K.; Fu, W.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Ye, Q.; Gui, W. QSAR models for the acute toxicity of 1,2,4-triazole fungicides to zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 114837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Buglak, A.A.; Zherdev, A.V.; Lei, H.T.; Dzantiev, B.B. QSAR analysis of immune recognition for triazine herbicides based on immunoassay data for polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Guo, H.; Wang, Y.; He, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Z. In silico rational design and virtual screening of antixoidant tripeptides based on 3D-QSAR modeling. J. Mol. Struct. 2019, 1193, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Salaković, B.; Kovačević, S.; Karadžić Banjac, M.; Podunavac-Kuzmanović, S.; Jevrić, L.; Pajčin, I.; Grahovac, J. New Perspective on Comparative Chemometric and Molecular Modeling of Antifungal Activity and Herbicidal Potential of Alkyl and Cycloalkyl s-Triazine Derivatives. Processes 2023, 11, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Jevrić, L.R.; Podunavac-Kuzmanović, S.O.; Švarc-Gajić, J.V.; Kovačević, S.Z.; Jovanović, B.Ž. RP-HPTLC Retention Data in Correlation with the In-silico ADME Properties of a Series of s-triazine Derivatives. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. IJPR 2014, 13, 1203. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  239. Türkmenoğlu, B.; Güzel, Y.; Su, E.M.; Kızılcan, D.Ş. Investigation of inhibitory activity of monoamine oxidase A with 4D-QSAR using Fukui indices identifier. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Zain-Alabdeen, A.I.; El-Moselhy, T.F.; Sharafeldin, N.; Angeli, A.; Supuran, C.T.; El-Hamamsy, M.H. Synthesis and anticancer activity of new benzensulfonamides incorporating s-triazines as cyclic linkers for inhibition of carbonic anhydrase IX. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 16756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Khalid, M.Z.; Ahmad, S.; Ngegba, P.M.; Zhong, G. Role of Endocrine System in the Regulation of Female Insect Reproduction. Biology 2021, 10, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Tchounwou, P.B.; Wilson, B.; Ishaque, A.; Ransome, R.; Huang, M.-J.; Leszczynski, J. Toxicity Assessment of Atrazine and Related Triazine Compounds in the Microtox Assay, and Computational Modeling for Their Structure-Activity Relationship. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2000, 1, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representative compounds of S-Triazine herbicides.
Figure 1. Representative compounds of S-Triazine herbicides.
Microorganisms 11 02558 g001
Figure 2. Toxicity of pesticides to non-target organisms.
Figure 2. Toxicity of pesticides to non-target organisms.
Microorganisms 11 02558 g002
Figure 3. Microbial-mediated bio-purification.
Figure 3. Microbial-mediated bio-purification.
Microorganisms 11 02558 g003
Figure 4. Nano-bioremediation of s-triazine herbicides.
Figure 4. Nano-bioremediation of s-triazine herbicides.
Microorganisms 11 02558 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahmad, S.; Chandrasekaran, M.; Ahmad, H.W. Investigation of the Persistence, Toxicological Effects, and Ecological Issues of S-Triazine Herbicides and Their Biodegradation Using Emerging Technologies: A Review. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102558

AMA Style

Ahmad S, Chandrasekaran M, Ahmad HW. Investigation of the Persistence, Toxicological Effects, and Ecological Issues of S-Triazine Herbicides and Their Biodegradation Using Emerging Technologies: A Review. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10):2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102558

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahmad, Sajjad, Murugesan Chandrasekaran, and Hafiz Waqas Ahmad. 2023. "Investigation of the Persistence, Toxicological Effects, and Ecological Issues of S-Triazine Herbicides and Their Biodegradation Using Emerging Technologies: A Review" Microorganisms 11, no. 10: 2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102558

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop