Next Article in Journal
The Imperative Use of Bacillus Consortium and Quercetin Contributes to Suppress Fusarium Wilt Disease by Direct Antagonism and Induced Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Study of the Interface between Wild Bird Populations and Poultry and Their Potential Role in the Spread of Avian Influenza
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

UHPLC/MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Metabolic Characteristics of Clinical Strain of Mycoplasma bovis

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
2
Institute of Animal Sciences, Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Agricultural and Rural Bureau of Helan County, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan 750200, China
Microorganisms 2023, 11(10), 2602; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102602
Submission received: 6 August 2023 / Revised: 10 October 2023 / Accepted: 18 October 2023 / Published: 21 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Mycoplasma bovis is a global concern for the cattle industry owing to its high rates of infection and resulting morbidity, but its pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Metabolic pathways and characteristics of M. bovis clinical strain were elucidated by comparing the differential expression of metabolites between M. bovis clinical strain NX114 and M. bovis international reference strain PG45. Metabolites of M. bovis in the logarithmic stage were analyzed based on the non-targeted metabolomic technology of ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS). We found 596 metabolites with variable expression, of which, 190 had substantial differences. Differential metabolite analysis of M. bovis NX114 showed organic acids and their derivatives, nucleosides, and nucleotide analogs as important components. We found O-Phospho-L-serine (SEP) as a potential signature metabolite and indicator of pathogenicity. The difference in nucleic acid metabolites reflects the difference in growth phenotypes between both strains of M. bovis. According to KEGG enrichment analysis, the ABC transporter synthesis route had the most differential metabolites of the first 15 differential enrichment pathways. This study reflects the species-specific differences between two strains of M. bovis and further enriches our understanding of its metabolism, paving the way for further research into its pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Mycoplasma bovis is a species of bacteria that is a key pathogen in cattle due to its high rates of morbidity in pneumonia and other infections [1]. The pathogen is extremely infectious and may quickly spread throughout a herd. M. bovis causes respiratory tract infections, mastitis, arthritis, otitis media, and infections in the womb after childbirth, leading to up to 80% of infection-related deaths in cattle [2]. Despite being identified in 1961, the pathogenesis of M. bovis remains unknown, particularly its molecular etiology. The prevalence of this pathogen is increasing owing to a lack of efficient vaccinations and medications for the prevention and treatment of diseases caused by its infection [3].
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of primary metabolites, signaling molecules, hormones, and secondary metabolites of small molecules in the entire life cycle or specific physiological cycles of microorganisms is an important field in systems biology [4]. The primary objective is to quantify the many dynamic reactions of metabolites in living organisms to external triggers, pathophysiology shifts, and gene mutations [5]. Microbial metabolomics is widely employed in biology and biomedicine, especially for microbial identification [6], metabolic pathway [7], antibiotic resistance [8], functional gene research [9], enzyme discovery [10], and synthetic biology [11]. Among them, non-targeted metabolomic analysis utilizing ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QqQ/MS) technology has grown in popularity in microbial metabolomic studies [12]. Moreover, the substantial effectiveness of this technique has been demonstrated by the identification of numerous detectable ionized using non-targeted metabolomics methods, followed by the use of multiple tools for metabolite annotation and structural characterization, providing a high-through microbial metabolomics method for biomarker discovery [13].
Members of Mycoplasma, a class of autonomous microorganisms with a minimal genome, can be used as model organisms for constructing metabolite networks in vitro. Currently, detailed metabolic network maps have been created for some model strains, such as E. coli and yeast [14]. Research scholars revealed differences among the metabolisms of M. bovis and Mycoplasma gallinum by comparing metabolomics and suggesting new gene annotations; nevertheless, certain primary or secondary metabolic processes remain unknown [15]. In this study, we utilized UHPLC-MS to investigate the differences in active metabolites between M. bovis clinical strain NX114 and M. bovis international reference strain PG45, as well as to investigate the complex and diverse metabolic pathways and features of M. bovis. Analysis of multiple response changes with a broader dynamic range and greater accuracy were utilized to identify and discriminate clinically crucial strains of M. bovis, providing high-throughput and big data regarding M. bovis pathogenicity. We believe that this paper will contribute to the understanding of M. bovis biology and its implications for bovine health. Moreover, our findings will stimulate further research in this area and pave the way for novel therapeutic strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Media

M. bovis clinical strain NX114 (GenBank accession no. CP135997) was isolated from the lung of a diseased Holstein calf with pneumonia in Ningxia Province, China. M. bovis type strain PG45 (ATCC 25523) is the international reference strain of M. bovis, and it was donated by Professor Aizhen Guo of Huazhong Agricultural University of China. Both strains were stored in PPLO broth (BD DifcoTM, San Jose, CA, USA) [16] with 40% glycerol (v/v) at −80 °C. Before utilization, both strains were cultured in PPLO broth.

2.2. Transmission EM

Samples were serially diluted tenfold at a ratio of 1:10 in DPBS (without Ca2+/Mg2+) before undergoing negative staining with 1% phosphotungstic acid. A grid with a carbon-coated formvar supporting film was added to for 5 min using a 15-L aliquot. Filter paper was used to absorb any surplus solution before the samples were dyed for 3 min and dried by air. Samples were viewed using an 80-kV electron microscope (JEM-1400 FLASH, Tokyo, Japan). Photographs were captured using a digital camera (EMSIS, Münster, Germany).

2.3. Determination of Growth Curve

We inoculated the isolates of M. bovis NX114 and M. bovis strain PG45 were added into PPLO liquid medium (10% w/v). Then, the number of colony-forming units (CFU) were measured once per 0 h up to 72 h (n = 6). Finally, we plotted the M. bovis growth curve using the log CFU/mL parameter as an ordinate and the culture time of the bacterial solution as the abscissa.

2.4. Extraction of Metabolites from Strains

A vortex was used to fully combine a 100 µL samples of both strains M. bovis in the logarithmic stage with 400 µL of cool, 1:1 methanol acetonitrile. Next, the combination was processed using cold baths and sonication. The combination was then centrifuged at a speed of 14,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C after being incubated at −20 °C for 1 h. Following vacuum drying, the supernatants were analyzed using UHPLC-MS.

2.5. UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis

The sample was automatically injected into an injector at 4 °C throughout the analysis. Samples were analyzed with the SHIMADZU-LC30 instrument and ACQUITY UPLC® HSS T3 column from Waters (Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase included A: 0.1% FA in water and B: 100% acetonitrile (ACN) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The gradient was 0% buffer B for 2 min, then 48% in 4 min, 100% in 4 min, sustained for 2 min, and finally 0% for 0.1 min, with a 3-min re-equilibration interval. Electrospray ionization (ESI) with positive and negative modes was used independently for MS data gathering. The HESI source conditions were Spray Voltage: 3.8 kV (positive) and 3.2 kV (negative); Capillary Temperature: 320 °C; Sheath Gas (nitrogen) flow rate: 30 arb (arbitrary units); Aux Gas flow rate: 5 arb; Probe Heater Temp: 350 °C; S-Lens RF Level: 50. For complete MS, the device was configured to acquire across the m/z range 70–1050 Da. The complete MS scans were taken at a resolution of 70,000 at m/z 200, and the MS/MS scan at 17,500 at m/z 200. The maximal injection times for MS and MS/MS were established at 100 ms and 50 ms, respectively. Finally, MS2 had a 2 m/z isolation window, and a normalized collision energy (stepped) for fragmentation was set to 20, 30, and 40.

2.6. Data Preprocessing

Data from the raw MS were aligned, corrected for retention time, and extracted using MS-DIAL (ver. 2.62) software. Metabolites were detected using precision mass (mass tolerance < 10 ppm) and MS/MS data (mass tolerance < 0.02 Da), which were compared to HMDB, massbank, and other public databases, alongside our self-built metabolite standard library. Only variables with at least 50% nonzero measurement values were retained in the extracted-ion features.

2.7. Multivariate Data Processing and Data Analysis

For all multivariate data analytics and modeling, R (version: 4.0.3) and R packages were utilized. Using Pareto scaling, the data were mean-centered. Principal component analysis (PCA), symmetrical partial least-square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and partial least-square discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were used to create models. With the use of permutation testing, all the evaluated models were checked for overfitting. R2X (cumulative) (perfect model: R2X (cum) = 1) and R2Y (cumulative) (perfect model: R2Y (cum) = 1) values were used to assess the models’ descriptive performance, while Q2 (cumulative) (perfect model: Q2 (cum) = 1) and a permutation test (n = 200) were used to assess their prediction performance. The permuted model should be unable to forecast classes; its R2 and Q2 values at the Y-axis intercept should be lower than the non-permuted model for Q2 and R2. OPLS-DA enabled the identification of distinguishing metabolites by utilizing the variable importance on projection (VIP). The VIP score value represents a variable’s contribution to sample discrimination across all classes. These scores are mathematically derived for each variable as a weighted sum of squares of PLS weights. The average VIP value is 1, and VIP values >1 are typically regarded as noteworthy. A high score corresponds to a good discrimination capacity and therefore serves as a criterion for biomarker selection.
The variable effect on projection (VIP) values from the OPLS-DA model and the two-tailed Student’s t test (p value) on the normalized raw data at the univariate analysis level were used to determine the discriminating metabolites. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple groups analysis was used to obtain the p value. Statistically-significant metabolites were those with VIP values larger than 1.0 and a p value lower than 0.05. The average mass response (area) ratio between two arbitrary classes was used to compute fold change. Cluster analysis, using the R package, was carried out using the detected differential metabolites. We used KEGG pathway analysis to identify the disturbed biological processes based on differential metabolite data (http://www.kegg.jp, accessed on 20 December 2022). Fisher’s exact test and FDR correction for multiple testing were used in KEGG enrichment studies. At the p < 0.05 level, enriched KEGG pathways were nominally statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Attributes of M. bovis

M. bovis may have a spherical, oval, or irregular polygonal shape, as transmission electron microscopy has shown. Individuals from M. bovis NX114 (Figure 1A,B) were slightly larger than those of PG45 (Figure 1C,D). Complete and clear cell membranes were observed on the surfaces of both strains of M. bovis, and no cell walls were found.

3.2. Measurement of Growth Curve

The results demonstrate that M. bovis NX114 and PG45 have comparable growth patterns; there was little variance in growth rate or proliferation ability across both strains. Both reached logarithmic phase after 36 h of culture (Figure 2).

3.3. Screening of Differential Metabolites of M. bovis

The UHPLC-Q-Exactive LC-MS approach was used in this work to characterize the metabolic characteristics of M. bovis in its log phase using non-targeted metabolomics. In M. bovis samples cultivated to log phase, 596 divergent metabolites were identified based on positive and negative ion collection techniques, of which 190 were significantly different compounds (Table S1). Quality control (QC) sample two-dimensional principal component analysis (2D PCA) score plots revealed an overall separation tendency between the M. bovis NX114 and PG45 strains (Figure 3A,B). The PCA model for M. bovis showed a trend towards complete separation, indicating a significant difference in the metabolic profile of M. bovis between the two strains. To accomplish visual clustering, we employed the orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) model. The OPLS-DA model revealed that M. bovis NX114 and PG45 strains had a general separation (Figure 4A,B). OPLS-DA showed that differences between different strains of M. bovis could be reflected at the metabolic level. The permutation tests verified the reliability of these models (Figure 4C,D).
The volcano plot (Figure 4E,F) shows changing trends of differential metabolite expression in the M. bovis NX114 and PG45 strains. Filter criteria were FC > 1.5, FC < 0.667, and p value < 0.05; the vertically dotted line analysis marked log2 (1/1.5) and log2 (1.5). Each point reflects a specific metabolite, and its size corresponds to the VIP value. The VIP value increases as the dot gets bigger. Blue dots signify downregulated metabolites, and red dots signify upregulated metabolites. Utilizing univariate statistical analysis, different metabolites were examined.

3.4. Analysis of Differential Metabolite Expression of M. bovis

Significant variations in metabolite screening criteria were discovered using OPLS-DA with VIP > 1 and p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test). We utilized the expression of qualitatively analyzed significant difference metabolites for hierarchical clustering of M. bovis NX114 and PG45 (Figure 5A), where 53 were upregulated and 69 were downregulated in positive ion mode; 20 were upregulated, and 48 were downregulated, when the ions were negative (Figure S1b). To investigate the connection between the differential metabolism of M. bovis NX114 and PG45, additional investigation of differential metabolites was carried out. The link between various metabolites was investigated using Pearson’s correlation analysis (Figure S2). A correlation coefficient matrix heat map was made using the top 10 metabolites with VIP levels (Figure 5B). Our findings demonstrate a close association between metabolites in similar or identical metabolic pathways. A Circos plot (Figure 5C) was used to visualize the data relationship, which was used to show the association between multiple metabolites.

3.5. Function Analysis of Differential Metabolites of M. bovis

A total of 190 different metabolites were classified and counted according to their structures and functions. The HMDB database revealed 109 significantly separate metabolites out of these. Several different metabolites were separated into 12 teams, including 23 organoheterocyclic compounds (21.1%) and 20 lipids and lipid-like molecules (18.35%). There were 18 benzenoids (16.51%); 12 organic acids and derivatives (11.01%); 11 phenylpropanoids and polyketides (10.99%); 7 organic oxygen compounds (6.42%); 6 nucleosides, nucleotides analogues, and organic nitrogen compounds (5.5%); 3 alkaloids andderivatives (2.75%); and 1 hydrocarbon, lignans neolignans and related compounds, and organosulfur compounds (0.92%) (Figure 6A).
Using Fisher’s exact test analysis and calculation of the significance amount of metabolite enrichment via each pathway, 85 pathways in the clinical strain of M. bovis NX114 were changed compared to those of the M. bovis international reference strain PG45 (Table S2). KEGG ID mapping of metabolites with significant differences was performed to clarify functions of the metabolites and the relationships between metabolites. The top 30 most significant metabolic pathways were selected according to their p values and are presented as a bubble map (Figure 6B). The first 30 metabolic pathways mainly involved ABC transporters, neuroactive ligand–receptor interactions, ferroptosis, pyrimidine metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, and urine metabolism.
To systemically study metabolic changes, the overall trend of metabolic pathways was analyzed using differential metabolite abundance. Differential abundance scores (DA scores) captured the trend of overall metabolite increase/decrease in the pathway relative to the M. bovis international reference strain PG45. The DA score was calculated for the differential metabolite annotation data, and the top 30 pathways were chosen for drawing pictures (Figure 6C). To investigate the functional relationships of the latent differential metabolite enrichment pathways, the functional interactions of these pathways were evaluated using Cytoscape (Figure 6D). The results showed that ABC transporters, neuroactive ligand–receptor interactions, and cofactor biosynthesis pathways are the hubs of other related pathways.
We used an enriched string diagram (Figure 6E) and a Sankey energy shunt diagram (Figure 6F) to visualize data flow for differential metabolites and KEGG pathway levels. The results indicated that for the 21 differential metabolites engaged in the top 15 differentially enriched pathways (Table S3), the average expression of the differential metabolites in both strains is as shown in a box plot (Figure 7). Differential metabolites were observed between the two strains, with upregulated metabolites including O-Phospho-L-Serine (SEP) and melatonin (ML) (p < 0.05), and downregulated metabolites including uridine 5’-diphosphate (UDP), L-glutamic acid (Glu), glutathione (GSH), CMP, uridine 5’-monophosphate (UMP), riboflavin (B2), spermidine (SP), guanosine (Gsn), 2-isopropylmalic acid (2-IPMA) (p < 0.05). Additionally, N-acetylputrescine (NAP), ade-nine (Ade), alpha-tocopherol (at), flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) (p < 0.01), adenosine (Adn), uridine (Urd), trans-4-hydroxy-L-proline (T-4-Hyp), ophthalmate (OA) (p < 0.001), L-leucine (Leu), and guanine (G) did not show significant differences (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

Mycoplasma bovis is a pathogen that is not well understood, but can be extremely harmful to cattle. Previous studies have demonstrated that M. bovis is capable of inducing host lesions through the production of secondary metabolites [17]. Metabolites secreted by M. bovis are important in the induction of immune responses in host cells [18,19]. Metabolites are intermediates or end products of microbial metabolic processes, which are closely related to the phenotypes of biological systems and control the regulation of phenotypic functions, so they better reflect the body phenotype than other “omics.” Moreover, sampling in the logarithmic phase for detection can obtain more metabolites, which are more representative to reflect the growth state of microorganisms [20,21]. In this study, we investigated the metabolic pathways and characteristics of M. bovis clinical strain NX114 in comparison to those of the international standard strain PG45 during the logarithmic growth phase.

4.1. Important Components of Metabolites of M. bovis Clinical Strain

The study utilized UHPLC-MS non-targeted metabolomic technology combined with multivariate statistical analysis to identify and analyze differential metabolites in the two strains. In recent years, researchers have used large-scale metabolomics analysis to accurately map the metabolic network of Mycoplasma pneumonia [22] and qualitative images of metabolic pathways [23], and they have constructed a genomic metabolic model based on M. hyopneumoniae genome sequencing [24]. However, there is not yet an analysis of potential metabolite differences between the two pathogenic M. bovis strains isolated in the same host range. Our findings revealed a total of 596 differentially expressed metabolites between the two strains, with 190 of them showing significant differences. These metabolites were classified and counted according to structure and function, and 109 differential metabolites were searched through the HMDB database and further divided into 12 categories.
The differences in metabolite types and contents among the top five organoheterocyclic compounds (lipids, lipid-like molecules, benzenoids, organic acids, and their derivatives, phenylpropanoids, and polyketides) were characterized in detail for the two strains of M. bovis (Figure 6A). The interactions between these diverse metabolites were discovered using Pearson’s correlation analysis to evaluate the correlations between them (Figure S2), which would assist in disclosing possible metabolic control. By constructing an association network of the differentially expressed metabolites (Figure 5C), we found that organoheterocyclic compounds, nucleosides, and nucleotide analogs, although not the highest in terms of the number of differential metabolites, most closely correlated with other classes. It was revealed that organoheterocyclic compounds, nucleosides, and nucleotide analogues are important components of metabolites of M. bovis clinical strain NX114, but there are still 81 differential metabolites that have not yet been characterized, and further identification of differentially expressed metabolites of unknown classification should be conducted qualitatively and quantitatively.

4.2. Trend of Differential Metabolites and Pathways at All Levels of M. bovis

The results of this study showed that 21 distinct metabolites were implicated in the first 15 significantly enriched pathways (Table S3). The upregulated metabolites SEP and ML (p < 0.05) were mainly associated with aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, cysteine, and methionine metabolism, circadian entrainment, and neuroactive ligand–receptor inter-actions. Downregulated UDP, Glu, GSH, CMP, UMP, B2, SP, Gsn, 2-IPMA (p < 0.05), NAP, Ade, at, FAD (p < 0.01), Adn, Urd, T-4-Hyp, OA (p < 0.001), and Leu and G (p > 0.05) were mainly associated with ABC transporters, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, arginine and proline metabolism, biosynthesis of cofactors, circadian entrainment, cysteine and methionine metabolism, ferroptosis, glutathione metabolism, neuroactive ligand–receptor interaction, purine metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, riboflavin metabolism, valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis, vitamin digestion, and absorption are associated. Among these, enrichment of the ABC transporter synthesis pathway was the most significant and of the highest degree.

4.3. Potential Signature Metabolite and Possible Mechanisms of M. bovis

O-Phospho-L-serine (SEP), a molecule similar to the head group of phosphatidylserine, acts as a substrate for cysteine synthase (CysM) in vivo [25]. In this study, SEP was enriched in cysteine and methionine metabolism, trNA-aminoacyl biosynthesis pathways, and correlated with L-serine biosynthesis. However, SEP acts as a direct precursor of L-serine in the process of glycolysis pathway synthesis [26], whereas serine can only be phosphorylated when it is a protein component [27]. The significant difference in SEP abundance between the two strains of M. bovis in the present study suggests that it may be due to different phosphoserine phosphatase activities when phosphoserine is finally converted to L-serine. In addition, SEP (Log2FC = 3.0292) was significantly higher in M. bovis NX114 than in M. bovis PG45 (p = 0.017). In addition, previous studies have shown that the relative abundance of SEP in M. bovis PG45 strain is higher than that in Mycoplasma gallinarum AP3AS strain [15], but there is no significant difference between it and its transposon mutant strain [28]. In addition, studies have shown that an increase in SEP is related to a higher severity of some diseases and deaths [29,30]. Therefore, SEP has potential as a biomarker with high expression in M. bovis. Whether SEP can be used to distinguish between Mycoplasma of different species and M. bovis of different genotypes. Whether the accumulation of SEP can be used as an indicator to judge the severity of the disease after M. bovis infection should be further evaluated by metabolite quantitative test to improve understanding of the pathogenesis of M. bovis.
Gamma-glutamyl-cysteine-glycine (GSH), a low-molecular-weight mercaptan produced from glutamic acid, cysteine, and glycine, is one of these compounds [31]. Our results revealed that M. bovis NX114 had considerably reduced levels of GSH (p < 0.05) and Glu (p < 0.05), as well as an enrichment in the glutathione metabolic pathway and involvement in several growth factor transport and amino acid metabolism pathways. These metabolites may reflect potential species-specific differences between the two strains of M. bovis within the same host range. In addition, KEGG enrichment analysis indicated that low levels of GSH, Glu, and Alpha-tocopherol may be related to Ferroptosis. GSH is the core component of amino acid metabolism during iron death, and ferroptosis is an iron-dependent programmed cell death mode. It is distinguished by GSH depletion, lipid peroxide (ROS) buildup, and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) inactivation [32]. These results suggest that M. bovis NX114 induces Ferroptosis in host cells through an abnormal amino acid metabolism pathway.

4.4. Nucleic Acid Metabolite Differences Reflect Distinct Growth Characteristics of M. bovis

Mycoplasma lacks the enzymatic metabolic pathways required for purine synthesis and the whey acid metabolic pathway required for pyrimidine synthesis. Therefore, the need for exogenous nucleic acids and nucleic acid precursors of mycoplasma is an important nutritional metabolic feature that distinguishes mycoplasma from other micro-organisms and accurately reflects its growth state [33]. Previous studies have used metabolomics technology to identify significant differences in the major nucleotide bases, nucleic acids, and nucleotides of two kinds of mycoplasma infecting different hosts (poultry and cattle), which confirmed the different nutritional metabolism characteristics of mycoplasma [15]. In addition, an enzyme converting nucleotide monophosphate to nucleoside was annotated in M. bovis, and an enzyme with similar function was found in M. gallisepticum [34], but there was no such enzyme or an enzyme with similar function in M. pneumoniae [23]. In this study, there were differences in purine and pyrimidine metabolism between the two strains of M. bovis, and the nucleic acid metabolites accurately reflected the different growth states of the two strains of M. bovis, suggesting that there may be different functions and activity levels of nucleosidases in M. bovis and the differences in nucleic acid metabolism pathways may be the reason for the differences in growth phenotypes of the two strains.

4.5. Significant Involvement of Transport System in M. bovis Metabolism

Mycoplasmas are assumed to rely on their host for numerous nutrients; hence, a robust transport mechanism is required to deliver nutrients [35]. Among them, the ABC transport system serves as the primary means of substance exchange between mycoplasma and the external environment [36]. Metabolite and bioinformatics analyses revealed that M. bovis can take up and replenish deficient nucleotides and nucleotide precursors into cells via nucleotide ABC transporters [28]. Moreover, it has been suggested that the substrate binding the ATP-dependent ABC transport system involved in nucleoside uptake may be one of the compensatory transporters [28]. The ABC transporter synthesis pathway was enriched to the highest and most significant degree in the present study, which further demonstrates that ABC transporters play an important role in the metabolism of M. bovis. However, the statistical analysis revealed that the metabolites G (p < 0.05), as well as Urd and Ade (p < 0.001), were significantly downregulated. Based on the findings, M. bovis NX114 potentially exhibits a deficiency or dysfunction in the nucleotide ABC transporter, alongside a lack of compensatory pathways.
Furthermore, oligophosphoric and amino acid uptake is considered particularly important for the growth of M. bovis, as their preferred nutrient sources have been proposed to be amino acids or organic acids [37]. Therefore, the abundance of Leu, Glu, Gsn, and T-4-Hyp in M. bovis NX114 was low in this study, reflecting the life and growth of two strains through the absorption of nutrients via the ABC transport system.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study revealed the differential expression of metabolites between the M. bovis clinical strain NX114 and M. bovis international reference strain PG45 during logarithmic growth. Based on UHPLC-MS non-targeted metabolomics techniques and multivariate statistical analysis, 596 differential metabolites were identified in this study, 190 of which were significant differential metabolites. These metabolites reflect the metabolic expression characteristics of M. bovis NX114, and the metabolic pathways involved, such as amino acid metabolism, nucleic acid metabolism, and transport system, reflect the different growth characteristics and potential species-specific differences of two strains of M. bovis with the same host range. These findings will stimulate further research in this area and pave the way for novel therapeutic strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11102602/s1, Figure S1a: Differential metabolite hierarchical clustering among all samples in the positive ion model, Figure S1b: Differential metabolite hierarchical clustering among all samples in the negative ion model; Figure S2: Differential metabolite correlation matrix heat map; Table S1: Significantly different metabolites of Mycoplasma bovis between the NX114 and PG45; Table S2: Enrichment of the KEGG pathway of Mycoplasma bovis between the NX114 and PG45; Table S3: Differential metabolites involved in differential enrichment pathways of Mycoplasma bovis between the NX114 and PG45.

Author Contributions

F.Y., M.Y. and Y.G.; methodology, M.Y. and Y.G.; collection of M. bovis samples, F.Y. and M.Y.; performing laboratory work, D.S. and F.Y.; formal analysis, F.Y., M.Y., D.S., J.S., F.L. and Y.Q.; data curation, F.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H.; writing—review and editing, S.H.; supervision, S.H. and Y.G.; project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province (Grant Number: 2022AAC05045 and 2023AAC03890), Ningxia Province key research and development project (Grant Number: 2022BBF03024 and 2022BBF03025), Ningxia major achievement transformation project (2023CJE09028).

Data Availability Statement

Metabolomics data have been deposited into the EMBL-EBI MetaboLights database with the identifier MTBLS8708.

Acknowledgments

We greatly appreciate the donation of M. bovis type strain PG45 (ATCC 25523) by Aizhen Guo of Huazhong Agricultural University of China. We thank Shanghai Bioprofile Technology Company Ltd. for support in metabolomics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Y.F.; Zhou, Y.P.; Zhang, J.H.; Wang, X.H.; Lv, T.X.; Shi, X.N.; Huang, H.B.; Bai, F.; Wu, Q.; Hao, Y.Q. iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis of Mycoplasma bovis NM-28 strain from two generations for vaccine screening. Vaccine 2020, 38, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Perez-Casal, J. Pathogenesis and Virulence of Mycoplasma bovis. Vet. Clin. N. Am.-Food Anim. Pract. 2020, 36, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Oliveira, T.E.S.; Pelaquim, I.F.; Flores, E.F.; Massi, R.P.; Valdiviezo, M.J.J.; Pretto-Giordano, L.G.; Alfieri, A.A.; Saut, J.P.E.; Headley, S.A. Mycoplasma bovhisand viral agents associated with the development of bovine respiratory disease in adult dairy cows. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ye, D.Y.; Li, X.W.; Shen, J.Z.; Xia, X. Microbial metabolomics: From novel technologies to diversified applications. TRAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2022, 148, 116540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Covington, B.C.; McLean, J.A.; Bachmann, B.O. Comparative mass spectrometry-based metabolomics strategies for the investigation of microbial secondary metabolites. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2017, 34, 6–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Neumann-Cip, A.C.; Fingerle, V.; Margos, G.; Straubinger, R.K.; Overzier, E.; Ulrich, S.; Wieser, A. A Novel Rapid Sample Preparation Method for MALDI-TOF MS Permits Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Species and Isolate Differentiation. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rappez, L.; Stadler, M.; Triana, S.; Gathungu, R.M.; Ovchinnikova, K.; Phapale, P.; Heikenwalder, M.; Alexandrov, T. SpaceM reveals metabolic states of single cells. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mielko, K.A.; Jablonski, S.J.; Pruss, L.; Milczewska, J.; Sands, D.; Lukaszewicz, M.; Mlynarz, P. Metabolomics Comparison of Drug-Resistant and Drug-Susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain (Intra- and Extracellular Analysis). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.Y.; Xie, Y.P.; Gao, P.; Zhang, S.F.; Tan, H.D.; Yang, F.X.; Lian, R.W.; Tian, J.; Xu, G.W. A metabolomics-based method for studying the effect of yfcC gene in Escherichia coli on metabolism. Anal. Biochem. 2014, 451, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sevin, D.C.; Fuhrer, T.; Zamboni, N.; Sauer, U. Nontargeted in vitro metabolomics for high-throughput identification of novel enzymes in Escherichia coli. Nat. Methods 2017, 14, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, C.; Zhang, N.; Chen, M.; Wang, H.; Shi, J.; Wang, B.; Sun, B.; Wang, C. Metabolomics Analysis of the Effect of Glutamic Acid on Monacolin K Synthesis in Monascus purpureus. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 610471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Alseekh, S.; Aharoni, A.; Brotman, Y.; Contrepois, K.; D’Auria, J.; Ewald, J.; Ewald, J.C.; Fraser, P.D.; Giavalisco, P.; Hall, R.D.; et al. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: A guide for annotation, quantification and best reporting practices. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Delvaux, A.; Rathahao-Paris, E.; Alves, S. Different ion mobility-mass spectrometry coupling techniques to promote metabolomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2022, 41, 695–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Said-Salman, I.H.; Jebaii, F.A.; Yusef, H.H.; Moustafa, M.E. Global gene expression analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 DH5α after exposure to 2.4 GHz wireless fidelity radiation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 14425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Masukagami, Y.; De Souza, D.P.; Dayalan, S.; Bowen, C.; O’Callaghan, S.; Kouremenos, K.; Nijagal, B.; Tull, D.; Tivendale, K.A.; Markham, P.F.; et al. Comparative Metabolomics of Mycoplasma bovis and Mycoplasma gallisepticum Reveals Fundamental Differences in Active Metabolic Pathways and Suggests Novel Gene Annotations. mSystems 2017, 2, e00055-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rasheed, M.A.; Qi, J.; Zhu, X.; He, C.; Menghwar, H.; Khan, F.A.; Gang, Z.; Zubair, M.; Hu, C.; Chen, Y.; et al. Comparative Genomics of Mycoplasma bovis Strains Reveals That Decreased Virulence with Increasing Passages Might Correlate with Potential Virulence-Related Factors. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Maunsell, F.P.; Woolums, A.R.; Francoz, D.; Rosenbusch, R.F.; Step, D.L.; Wilson, D.J.; Janzen, E.D. Mycoplasma bovis Infections in Cattle. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2011, 25, 772–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zbinden, C.; Pilo, P.; Frey, J.; Bruckmaier, R.M.; Wellnitz, O. The immune response of bovine mammary epithelial cells to live or heat-inactivated Mycoplasma bovis. Vet. Microbiol. 2015, 179, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gondaira, S.; Higuchi, H.; Iwano, H.; Nakajima, K.; Kawai, K.; Hashiguchi, S.; Konnai, S.; Nagahata, H. Cytokine mRNA profiling and the proliferative response of bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells to Mycoplasma bovis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2015, 165, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Baidoo, E.E.K.; Teixeira Benites, V. Mass Spectrometry-Based Microbial Metabolomics: Techniques, Analysis, and Applications. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1859, 11–69. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Baidoo, E.E.K. Microbial Metabolomics: A General Overview. In Microbial Metabolomics; Methods in Molecular Biology; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 1859, pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wodke, J.A.H.; Puchalka, J.; Lluch-Senar, M.; Marcos, J.; Yus, E.; Godinho, M.; Gutierrez-Gallego, R.; dos Santos, V.; Serrano, L.; Klipp, E.; et al. Dissecting the energy metabolism in Mycoplasma pneumoniae through genome-scale metabolic modeling. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maier, T.; Marcos, J.; Wodke, J.A.; Paetzold, B.; Liebeke, M.; Gutiérrez-Gallego, R.; Serrano, L. Large-scale metabolome analysis and quantitative integration with genomics and proteomics data in Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Mol. Biosyst. 2013, 9, 1743–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kamminga, T.; Slagman, S.J.; Bijlsma, J.J.E.; Martins Dos Santos, V.A.P.; Suarez-Diez, M.; Schaap, P.J. Metabolic modeling of energy balances in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae shows that pyruvate addition increases growth rate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017, 114, 2339–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. O’Leary, S.E.; Jurgenson, C.T.; Ealick, S.E.; Begley, T.P. O-phospho-L-serine and the thiocarboxylated sulfur carrier protein CysO-COSH are substrates for CysM, a cysteine synthase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 11606–11615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. de Koning, T.J.; Snell, K.; Duran, M.; Berger, R.; Poll-The, B.T.; Surtees, R. L-serine in disease and development. Biochem. J. 2003, 371 Pt 3, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rossi, C.R.; Sartorelli, L.; Siliprandi, N. On the biochemical significance of phosphoserine: A working hypothesis. Ital. J. Biochem. 1980, 29, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Masukagami, Y.; Nijagal, B.; Mahdizadeh, S.; Tseng, C.W.; Dayalan, S.; Tivendale, K.A.; Markham, P.F.; Browning, G.F.; Sansom, F.M. A combined metabolomic and bioinformatic approach to investigate the function of transport proteins of the important pathogen Mycoplasma bovis. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 234, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fürst, P.; Stehle, P. What are the essential elements needed for the determination of amino acid requirements in humans? J. Nutr. 2004, 134 (Suppl. 6), 1558s–1565s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chiarla, C.; Giovannini, I.; Siegel, J.H. High phosphoserine in sepsis: Panel of clinical and plasma amino acid correlations. Springerplus 2014, 3, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Oestreicher, J.; Morgan, B. Glutathione: Subcellular distribution and membrane transport. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019, 97, 270–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ye, Y.; Chen, A.; Li, L.; Liang, Q.; Wang, S.; Dong, Q.; Fu, M.; Lan, Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; et al. Repression of the antiporter SLC7A11/glutathione/glutathione peroxidase 4 axis drives ferroptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells to facilitate vascular calcification. Kidney Int. 2022, 102, 1259–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Johnson, C.H.; Jiang, Y.; Li, X.; Wu, Z.; Liu, T.; Krausz, K.W.; Yu, A.; et al. Metabolomics reveals mycoplasma contamination interferes with the metabolism of PANC-1 cells. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 4267–4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vanyushkina, A.A.; Fisunov, G.Y.; Gorbachev, A.Y.; Kamashev, D.E.; Govorun, V.M. Metabolomic analysis of three Mollicute species. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. McGowin, C.L.; Totten, P.A. The Unique Microbiology and Molecular Pathogenesis of Mycoplasma genitalium. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 216 (Suppl. S2), S382–S388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Qi, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, L. Engineering microbial membranes to increase stress tolerance of industrial strains. Metab. Eng. 2019, 53, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, L.A.; Loria, G.R.; Ramirez, A.S.; Nicholas, R.A.; Miles, R.J.; Fielder, M.D. Biochemical characterisation of some non fermenting, non arginine hydrolysing mycoplasmas of ruminants. Vet. Microbiol. 2005, 109, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphology of M. bovis under transmission electron microscope after negative staining; (A,C) 15,000×; (B,D) 40,000×.
Figure 1. Morphology of M. bovis under transmission electron microscope after negative staining; (A,C) 15,000×; (B,D) 40,000×.
Microorganisms 11 02602 g001
Figure 2. Growth curve of both strains of M. bovis in PPLO medium.
Figure 2. Growth curve of both strains of M. bovis in PPLO medium.
Microorganisms 11 02602 g002
Figure 3. PCA score of M. bovis metabolomics analysis. (A,B) PCA score plots utilizing the metabolic profiles of both strains in positive and negative modes. ESI+: R2 = 0.586, ESI−: R2 = 0.569.
Figure 3. PCA score of M. bovis metabolomics analysis. (A,B) PCA score plots utilizing the metabolic profiles of both strains in positive and negative modes. ESI+: R2 = 0.586, ESI−: R2 = 0.569.
Microorganisms 11 02602 g003
Figure 4. OPLS-DA map, 200-displacement test, and volcano map of M. bovis metabolomics analysis (A,C,E) ESI+ model, (B,D,F) ESI− model.
Figure 4. OPLS-DA map, 200-displacement test, and volcano map of M. bovis metabolomics analysis (A,C,E) ESI+ model, (B,D,F) ESI− model.
Microorganisms 11 02602 g004
Figure 5. Analysis of differential metabolite expression in M. bovis metabolomics. (A) Differential metabolite hierarchical clustering, with red indicating greater relative expression levels and blue indicating fewer relative expression levels. The figure shows the metabolite classification information based on the KEGG and HMDB databases. (B) The correlation coefficient (R) among distinct metabolites lies between −1 and +1 in the correlation matrix heat map. R > 0 denotes a positive correlation, which is depicted in red; R = 0 denotes a negative correlation, which is shown in blue. The bigger the proportion of coloring interval, the stronger the positive or negative correlation. (C) Cicos circle, from the outside to the inside, shows the metabolite names, HMDB classification of metabolites, log2(fold change), p value, VIP, and correlation connections based on OPLS-DA analysis.
Figure 5. Analysis of differential metabolite expression in M. bovis metabolomics. (A) Differential metabolite hierarchical clustering, with red indicating greater relative expression levels and blue indicating fewer relative expression levels. The figure shows the metabolite classification information based on the KEGG and HMDB databases. (B) The correlation coefficient (R) among distinct metabolites lies between −1 and +1 in the correlation matrix heat map. R > 0 denotes a positive correlation, which is depicted in red; R = 0 denotes a negative correlation, which is shown in blue. The bigger the proportion of coloring interval, the stronger the positive or negative correlation. (C) Cicos circle, from the outside to the inside, shows the metabolite names, HMDB classification of metabolites, log2(fold change), p value, VIP, and correlation connections based on OPLS-DA analysis.
Microorganisms 11 02602 g005
Figure 6. Metabolite function analysis of M. bovis metabolomics differences. (A). differential metabolite classification ring map (HMDB); (B). KEGG pathway enrichment bubble diagram. Level 1 Path classification: Cellular Processes (C), Drug Development (D), Environmental Information Processing (E), Genetic Information Processing (G), Human Diseases (H), Metabolism (M), Organismal Systems (O). (C). DA score showed an overall down-regulation trend of metabolic pathways. Functional interaction network diagram of (D) channel. (E). String diagram shows the correspondence between upregulated metabolites and the KEGG pathway. (F). Sankey diagram shows the trend analysis of data flow at the upper down-regulated metabolite and the KEGG pathway levels.
Figure 6. Metabolite function analysis of M. bovis metabolomics differences. (A). differential metabolite classification ring map (HMDB); (B). KEGG pathway enrichment bubble diagram. Level 1 Path classification: Cellular Processes (C), Drug Development (D), Environmental Information Processing (E), Genetic Information Processing (G), Human Diseases (H), Metabolism (M), Organismal Systems (O). (C). DA score showed an overall down-regulation trend of metabolic pathways. Functional interaction network diagram of (D) channel. (E). String diagram shows the correspondence between upregulated metabolites and the KEGG pathway. (F). Sankey diagram shows the trend analysis of data flow at the upper down-regulated metabolite and the KEGG pathway levels.
Microorganisms 11 02602 g006
Figure 7. Metabolomic differential metabolites. Welch’s t-test was performed for significance, and the specific p value was highlighted in the figure and represented by * for p < 0.05, ** for p < 0.01, *** for p < 0.001, and blank for p > 0.05 (no significance). The average degree of differential metabolite expression between both groups is also shown, with the horizontal coordinate representing different groups and the vertical coordinate representing the relative expression amount.
Figure 7. Metabolomic differential metabolites. Welch’s t-test was performed for significance, and the specific p value was highlighted in the figure and represented by * for p < 0.05, ** for p < 0.01, *** for p < 0.001, and blank for p > 0.05 (no significance). The average degree of differential metabolite expression between both groups is also shown, with the horizontal coordinate representing different groups and the vertical coordinate representing the relative expression amount.
Microorganisms 11 02602 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, F.; Yang, M.; Si, D.; Sun, J.; Liu, F.; Qi, Y.; He, S.; Guo, Y. UHPLC/MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Metabolic Characteristics of Clinical Strain of Mycoplasma bovis. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102602

AMA Style

Yang F, Yang M, Si D, Sun J, Liu F, Qi Y, He S, Guo Y. UHPLC/MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Metabolic Characteristics of Clinical Strain of Mycoplasma bovis. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(10):2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102602

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Fei, Mengmeng Yang, Duoduo Si, Jialin Sun, Fan Liu, Yanrong Qi, Shenghu He, and Yanan Guo. 2023. "UHPLC/MS-Based Untargeted Metabolomics Reveals Metabolic Characteristics of Clinical Strain of Mycoplasma bovis" Microorganisms 11, no. 10: 2602. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11102602

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop