Next Article in Journal
Diversity of Bacterial Clones and Plasmids of NDM-1 Producing Escherichia coli Clinical Isolates in Central Greece
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Genomic Analysis of Enterococci across Sectors of the One Health Continuum
Previous Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 Affects Both Humans and Animals: What Is the Potential Transmission Risk? A Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic Islands Identified in Highly Resistant Serratia sp. HRI: A Pathway to Discover New Disinfectant Resistance Elements

by
Samantha J. McCarlie
,
Charlotte E. Boucher
and
Robert R. Bragg
*
Department of Microbiology and Biochemistry, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(2), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020515
Submission received: 13 January 2023 / Revised: 13 February 2023 / Accepted: 14 February 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023

Abstract

:
Molecular insights into the mechanisms of resistance to disinfectants are severely limited, together with the roles of various mobile genetic elements. Genomic islands are a well-characterised molecular resistance element in antibiotic resistance, but it is unknown whether genomic islands play a role in disinfectant resistance. Through whole-genome sequencing and the bioinformatic analysis of Serratia sp. HRI, an isolate with high disinfectant resistance capabilities, nine resistance islands were predicted and annotated within the genome. Resistance genes active against several antimicrobials were annotated in these islands, most of which are multidrug efflux pumps belonging to the MFS, ABC and DMT efflux families. Antibiotic resistance islands containing genes encoding for multidrug resistance proteins ErmB (macrolide and erythromycin resistance) and biclomycin were also found. A metal fitness island harbouring 13 resistance and response genes to copper, silver, lead, cadmium, zinc, and mercury was identified. In the search for disinfectant resistance islands, two genomic islands were identified to harbour smr genes, notorious for conferring disinfectant resistance. This suggests that genomic islands are capable of conferring disinfectant resistance, a phenomenon that has not yet been observed in the study of biocide resistance and tolerance.

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted our need for effective disinfectants, antiseptics, and sanitisers (biocides). The antibiotic resistance crisis can be seen as a warning or foreshadowing of an equally alarming phenomenon of microbial resistance to disinfectants. This means it is troubling that, within the food and agricultural industries and medical environments, resistance to disinfectants amongst microorganisms is emerging at a startling rate [1,2,3,4].
Mobile genetic elements (MGEs) play a significant role in the transfer of genes which confer antimicrobial resistance [5,6,7,8]. Their mobility is brought about by horizontal gene transfer, resulting in populations with reduced susceptibility to various antimicrobials [5,8]. Resistance can develop against several antimicrobials simultaneously, without prior exposure [9]. Genomic island (GI) is an umbrella term for mobile genetic elements found on the bacterial chromosome that have been acquired through horizontal gene transfer, usually between 10 and 200 kb in length [6,10,11]. This overarching term also includes integrated plasmids, integrons, prophages, conjugative transposons, and integrative conjugative elements [6,10,11,12]. These MGEs are then given more specific identities based on their mechanism of transfer (conjugation, transduction, or transformation) and genes present (transposases, integrases etc.) [6,12].
Genomic islands can be further characterised based on the phenotype they confer. For example, pathogenicity islands encode genes that confer an advantage in pathogenicity [13], resistance islands encode antimicrobial resistance genes [14], and metabolic islands contain genes that confer an additive metabolic advantage [6,10].
The bioinformatic identification of genomic islands is achieved using two approaches. The first is via sequence composition, and the second is via comparative genomics [10,11]. Both techniques have respective advantages and limitations, and therefore, a combination of the two provides the most sensitive and precise output [10,12]. IslandViewer4 is the gold standard for genomic island prediction, as it incorporates four different genomic island prediction methods, IslandPick, IslandPath-DIMOB, SIGI-HMM, and Islander [15].
Genomic islands have been found to play a role in antibiotic resistance [8,16]. However, minimal research has been carried out on the role of genomic islands in disinfectant resistance. As this is an emerging issue, more insight into the molecular mechanisms of resistance to disinfectants and other biocides is needed. A genomic island in Listeria monocytogenes isolates was found to be responsible for food-borne outbreaks harbouring multiple resistance genes, including an efflux pump involved in benzalkonium chloride resistance (ErmE) [17,18]. Jiang and co-workers (2020) found that the sug operon on the bacterial chromosome encoding SMR efflux pumps conferred resistance to benzalkonium chloride. This research brings forth the idea that resistance islands may be the latest genetic element capable of conferring resistance to disinfectants.
Resistance islands are often harboured in multidrug-resistant bacteria as one of many mechanisms to increase survivability [19]. One of these bacteria, Serratia sp. HRI, has high disinfectant resistance capabilities and provides a unique opportunity to study resistance to disinfectants and other biocides [20]. Several mechanisms of resistance to disinfectants have been elucidated, with efflux pumps being the most common. However, molecular-based resistance has mostly been limited to the study of plasmids. Little is known about which other mobile genetic elements can play a significant role in the development and dissemination of the disinfectant resistance phenotype. In the search for novel mechanisms of disinfectant resistance, genomic islands and the hypothetical proteins they harbour are attractive targets in the search for novel, previously undescribed mechanisms of resistance. If the molecular basis of disinfectant resistance is better understood, this will help to safeguard our current disinfectants and ensure proper biosafety in the agricultural, food, and medical industries. The aim of this work is to use prediction software and bioinformatic analysis to determine whether genomic islands can contribute to disinfectant resistance. The finding of several resistance islands harbouring known disinfectant resistance genes within this highly resistant isolate suggests that genomic islands can be characterised as a molecular element capable of conferring disinfectant and biocide tolerance and resistance. This paper adds to the evidence that genomic islands are capable of conferring biocide tolerance and resistance.

2. Materials and Methods

Serratia sp. HRI was isolated from a bottle of Didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC)-based disinfectant [20]. Upon analysis, high levels of resistance to Quaternary Ammonium Compound (QAC) disinfectants were found via Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) tests [20].
The unusually high level of resistance observed in this isolate, together with its isolation from a bottle of disinfectant, prompted research into this microorganism. The genome of Serratia sp. HRI was sequenced and previously published [20]. The raw reads from this sequencing run, described previously, were then assembled again using the PATRIC (v. July 2021) de novo Genome Assembly service with default parameters unless otherwise specified (available at https://www.bv-brc.org/app/Assembly2) [21].
This assembled genome is 5 533 130 bp long, with GC content of 59.1%, an N50 score of 348 770, an L50 of 5, 47 contigs, and 126 RNAs, deposited on NCBI under Genbank Accession No. CP083690.1. This genome was uploaded to IslandViewer4 [15] with Serratia marcescens strain N4-5 chromosome sequence as a reference. IslandViewer4 uses four genomic island prediction methods (IslandPick, IslandPath-DIMOB, SIGI-HMM, and Islander) to identify genomic islands [15]. Thereafter, resistance genes are identified by IslandViewer4 using the Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) from the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) [22], as well as virulence factors from the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) [23], PATRIC [24], and Victor’s virulence factors (http://www.phidias.us/victors/ (accessed on 11 January 2022)), in addition to 18 919 pathogen-associated genes [25,26]. For further analysis and annotation, the sequence of each genomic island was uploaded to RAST and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) NCBI annotation tool for additional annotation [27,28].
In the GIs of interest (GI 11, 20, and 76), any gene annotated as a hypothetical or uncharacterised protein was finally run through the PSI-BLAST program [29] and annotated further if any significant hits were found.

3. Results

IslandViewer4 identified 92 genomic islands within the genome of Serratia sp. HRI, as depicted in Figure 1. Of the 92 genomic islands, 9 contained known antimicrobial resistance genes or genes implicated in antimicrobial resistance; these genomic islands were predicted via at least two prediction methods. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 represent the structure of these genomic islands and annotated gene lists [27,30,31].
Three of the nine genomic islands are shown in more detail as they contain resistance genes of particular interest (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4); the remaining six islands are depicted in more detail in the Supplementary section (Tables S1–S6). Resistance island 11 is studied closely due to the number of resistance genes and their combination with hypothetical proteins, transcriptional regulators, and toxin–antitoxin systems. Resistance islands 20 and 76 are of interest as they contain known disinfectant resistance genes and a number of hypothetical proteins.
Genomic island 11 is represented in Table 2. This resistance island contains 78 annotated genes, including 7 genes encoding various efflux pumps. Of the seven genes, these include two copies of permeases of the drug/metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily and a probable Co/Zn/Cd efflux system membrane fusion protein. Various components of efflux systems, such as an inner-membrane proton/drug antiporter (MSF type) of a tripartite multidrug efflux system, an outer membrane factor (OMF) lipoprotein, and two ABC-type antimicrobial peptide transport system proteins, make up the permease component and ATPase component. There are about 40 hypothetical proteins and multiple transcriptional regulators within this genomic island, including those of the Trx, AcrR, LuxR, and LysR families.
Genes of interest in genomic island 20, represented in Table 3, include a small multidrug resistance efflux protein (SMR), an ABC transporter permease protein, and a probable Co/Zn/Cd efflux system membrane fusion protein. Several genes are associated with conjugative transfer, mobile element proteins, an integron-associated gene, and transposase-associated genes. Hypothetical protein 19 was further annotated by NCBI PGAP as an SMR family transporter, a well-known disinfectant resistance gene.
Genomic island 76, depicted in Table 4, contains 47 genes, including an smr gene and an ABC-type multidrug transport system gene, together with a complete toxin–antitoxin system (YoeB/YefM). This genomic island is also a mosaic of several mobile element associated genes, such as an integrase, repeat regions, recombinase, and multiple mobilisation proteins (MobA, MobC). Hypothetical protein 7 in GI 76 had a significant similarity hit in the BLAST program with a multidrug efflux ABC transporter permease/ATP-binding subunit SmdA (Max score: 25.0, Total score: 25.0, Query cover: 74%, E value: 1.9, Per. Ident: 26.51%). This protein is located next to a component of an ABC-type multidrug transport system and is likely part of an efflux system. Hypothetical protein 11, located adjacent to an SMR disinfectant resistance protein, had the highest similarity hit with GNAT family N-acetyltransferase (Serratia marcescens) when run through the BLAST program. This family of proteins is responsible for resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics [32] and could play a role in the antimicrobial resistance of Serratia sp. HRI.
Although the following genomic islands were not highlighted, each has interesting characteristics and contains at least one antimicrobial resistance gene. Genomic island 18, depicted in Table S1 in the Supplementary section, contains heavy metal response genes to molybdenum and two ABC-type efflux pump permease components, YbhS and YbhR. These proteins, together with YbhF, form YbhFSR, which functions in tetracycline efflux and Na+(Li+)/H+ transport [33]. Adjacent to these genes is ybhL, a closely related gene whose function is unknown but is hypothesised to be involved in stress response and cell protection by unknown mechanisms [34].
Table S2 represents genomic island 23, which is one of the smallest GIs identified with only four genes. Some argue it should not be identified as a GI due to its small size [11]. However, as it contains a multidrug resistance gene from the DMT superfamily, it is noteworthy.
Genomic island 28, depicted in Table S3, contains genes encoding antibiotic multidrug resistance protein ErmB (macrolide and erythromycin resistance) and an adjacent ABC efflux gene [35,36]. This GI also contains multiple transposase genes and components from insertion sequence element IS911, suggesting this insertion sequence may have played a role in the evolution of this resistance island.
Genomic island 33 is a small island with only one annotated protein, shown in Table S4. The protein annotated is an HtpX protease, which, together with ClpA, is involved in aminoglycoside resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [37,38]. Although this island does not contain the ClpA gene, the HtpX protease has been co-selected with multiple hypothetical proteins, which may aid in its function and could be candidates for further study.
Genomic island 42 is a highly conserved metal response island, described in Table S5, harbouring 13 genes involved in metal response with three complete toxin–antitoxin systems. Multiple toxin–antitoxin systems and several MGE-associated genes suggest this genomic island is mobile and highly conserved within a population. The toxin–antitoxin system, HigA/HigB, has been found to play a regulatory role in virulence and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [39,40]. The metal response genes include those for silver and copper, which are being promoted as used in some products an alternatives to current antimicrobials [41]. These characteristics threaten the efficacy of the potential of this alternative treatment.
A bicyclomycin resistance protein can be found on genomic island 46 in Table S6. This resistance protein, together with error-prone repair (UmuD) and error-prone DNA polymerase (UmuC), could introduce mutations and aid in the evolution of antimicrobial resistance.

4. Discussion

Resistance islands are a well-known molecular element capable of conferring antibiotic resistance [42], but little research has been carried out on whether these mobile elements play a role in disinfectant and biocide resistance. Improved sequencing technology and more accessible bioinformatic programs have opened the door to the study of these elements and their impact on the resistance profile. This work aims to use these advances in sequencing technology to identify regions likely characterised as resistance islands contributing to the high levels of disinfectant resistance observed in this isolate.
These results are integrated images and gene annotations generated by the IslandViewer4, RAST, PGAP, and PSI-BLAST programs. A total of 92 genomic islands were found within the genome of Serratia sp. HRI, and a few are highlighted here as they are of extrachromosomal origin, identified within a highly resistant microorganism, and harbour antimicrobial resistance genes. The vast amount of genomic islands identified within Serratia sp. HRI aligns with the predicted high level of plasticity within the Serratia genus [5]. High genomic plasticity can lead to a mosaic of MGEs and can be attributable to resultant antimicrobial resistance [8]. Iguchi and co-workers (2014) found high genome plasticity in a clinical Serratia marcescens isolate. Compared to a non-resistant isolate, a mosaic of mobile genetic elements and acquired resistance genes contributed to the high levels of antimicrobial resistance in the clinical isolate [5].
Genomic island 11 was the first presented here and can be described as an all-round resistance and fitness island, as it harbours several annotated resistance genes applicable to various antimicrobials. This genomic island includes partial efflux systems from the MFS, OMF, and ABC families and two copies of complete systems from the DMT efflux family. Efflux genes that are not labelled as resistance genes are also highlighted, as they are part of the genome of a highly resistant isolate, placed within a resistance island, and close to a resistance efflux system. Therefore, they are of interest for further study. This genomic island also carries genes involved in metal response, colicin immunity, transcriptional regulators, and multiple MGE components (insertion sequences, phage integrase, and mobility genes). All four transcriptional regulator families found within this GI have been shown to improve bacterial fitness and survivability. LysR-type transcriptional regulators have been reported to play a role in antibiotic resistance in Aeromonas sp. [43]. LuxR transcriptional regulators are involved in biofilm formation and stress response in Pseudomonas and Mycobacterium sp. [44,45]. AcrR transcriptional regulators and their mutations have been seen to contribute towards drug resistance in Salmonella sp. [46]. Finally, the possible regulatory protein thioredoxin (Trx) protects against oxidative stress, a well-established response after treatment by antimicrobials such as disinfectants [47]. Interestingly, more than half of all the genes present in this island are uncharacterised and are listed as hypothetical proteins. As this is a large genomic island and requires metabolic resources to maintain and transcribe these elements, it is intriguing that these genes have not been lost. This suggests that some of these hypothetical proteins which form the majority of this genomic island may have a function and are attractive candidates in the search for novel resistance genes and even novel mechanisms of resistance.
Genomic island 20 contains the first gene directly implicated in disinfectant resistance, the smr gene [19,48], as well as an ABC efflux permease protein. This island also contains a metal response gene and multiple conjugative transfer proteins alluding to the origin of this GI. Within this sequence, a mosaic of MGEs, including genes encoding transposases, an integrase, and mobile element proteins, were discovered. Multiple transcription regulators associated with antimicrobial resistance are again present in this GI, including regulators from the LysR family and Tetr families, linked to tetracycline resistance [49,50]. Within this resistance island, 11 out of 41 genes are uncharacterised and annotated as hypothetical proteins. This island contains multiple MGEs, suggesting high plasticity, and the probability of incorporating additional resistance determinants is high.
Genomic island 76 contains a complete toxin–antitoxin system (Yoe-B/YefM), an ABC multidrug efflux-encoding gene and, importantly an smr gene. This resistance island is conservable in a population due to the toxin–antitoxin system, and almost two-thirds of the genes in this island are uncharacterised. Out of the 47 genes making up this GI, 29 are hypothetical proteins that have been co-selected and maintained with the antimicrobial resistance genes in this island. These uncharacterised flanking sequences are potential targets in the search for new mechanisms of resistance.
When considered all together, these genomic islands contain multiple antimicrobial resistance genes harboured simultaneously within the genome of Serratia sp. HRI, which can confer a wide range of resistance within this single isolate. Although there were many incomplete efflux systems (GIs 11, 18, 19, 20, 28, and 76), bioinformatics and annotation software still have a way to go, and in the years to come, these systems may be annotated differently.
In a field such as disinfectant resistance, where knowledge of mechanisms is minimal, the vast numbers of hypothetical proteins within these resistance islands are attractive targets in searching for novel resistance genes and mechanisms of disinfectant resistance.
It is also interesting that very few genes identified in these islands were assigned to subsystems after annotation. This adds to the notion that bioinformatics and annotation programs need improvement, as more information is needed on where these genes fit into the bacterial metabolism and their function(s).
The plasticity and adaptability of the Serratia genome shows the capability of the this genus in acquiring MGEs that can contribute to the decreased susceptibility often observed in the Serratia genus [5]. The result is observed in isolates such as Serratia sp. HRI, whose genome is an assortment of fitness determinants gathered over time, increasing survivability to a wide range of antimicrobials. To confirm the phenotypic impact of these resistance islands and the extent of their impact, further work will be required.

5. Conclusions

There is limited information on whether genomic islands are capable of conferring resistance to disinfectants. Therefore, the genomic islands of Serratia sp. HRI will add to the knowledge of antimicrobial resistance and reinforce the idea that genomics islands can be described as the latest molecular element capable of conferring disinfectant resistance. This work also adds to the evidence for the cross-resistance and co-selection of antimicrobial resistance genes within a single organism. This work represents how predictive bioinformatic technology can lead targeted research into antimicrobial resistance. However, this is a starting point and only tells scientists where to look instead of providing a definitive answer. Phenotypic analysis needs to be coupled with predictive software to fully elucidate resistance mechanisms.
The increased use of disinfectants during the COVID-19 pandemic will inevitably give rise to less susceptible populations at an advanced rate. Amidst the pandemic, we are silently and unknowingly selecting disinfectant-resistant microorganisms. By getting ahead of disinfectant resistance, we will be able to safeguard our current disinfectants and ensure infection control in both the agricultural and medical industries.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11020515/s1, Table S1: Gene lists of genomic island 18 of Serratia sp. HRI (1 655 571 bp–1 660 471 bp, GC content 62.3, Size 4 900 bp) identified via IslandViewer4 and annotated via RAST, Table S2: Gene lists of genomic island 23 of Serratia sp. HRI (1 875 362 bp–1 879 853 bp, GC content: 45.1, Size 4 491 bp) identified via IslandViewer4 and annotated via RAST, Table S3: Gene lists of genomic island 28 of Serratia sp. HRI (2 294 061 bp–2 309 315 bp, GC content: 48.1, Size: 15 254 bp) identified via IslandViewer4 and additional annotated via RAST, Table S4: Gene lists of genomic island 33 of Serratia sp. HRI (2 548 843 bp–2 553 244 bp, GC content 41.9, Size: 4 401 bp) identified via IslandViewer4 and annotated via RAST, Table S5: Gene lists of genomic island 42 of Serratia sp. HRI (3 188 478 bp–3 232 330 bp, GC content: 51.2, Size: 43 852 bp) identified via IslandViewer4 and annotated via RAST, Table S6: Gene lists of genomic island 46 of Serratia sp. HRI (3 571 957 bp–3 586 537 bp, GC content: 51.7, Size: 14 580) identified via IslandViewer4 and annotated via RAST.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation (R.R.B.); data curation (S.J.M.); formal analysis (S.J.M.); funding acquisition (R.R.B., C.E.B.); investigation (S.J.M.); methodology (S.J.M., C.E.B., R.R.B.); project administration (R.R.B., C.E.B.); resources (R.R.B., C.E.B.); software (free, internet-based); supervision (R.R.B., C.E.B.); validation (S.J.M.); visualisation (S.J.M.); roles/writing—original draft (S.J.M.); writing—review and editing (R.R.B., C.E.B., S.J.M.). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data used in this article have been deposited with the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank Data Libraries under Genbank Accession No. CP083690.1.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Jeffrey Newman for his advice in the conceptualisation of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Argudín, M.A.; Lauzat, B.; Kraushaar, B.; Alba, P.; Agerso, Y.; Cavaco, L.; Butaye, P.; Porrero, M.C.; Battisti, A.; Tenhagen, B.-A.; et al. Heavy metal and disinfectant resistance genes among livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 191, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deng, W.; Quan, Y.; Yang, S.; Guo, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, S.; Chen, S.; Zhou, K.; He, L.; Li, B.; et al. Antibiotic Resistance in Salmonella from Retail Foods of Animal Origin and Its Association with Disinfectant and Heavy Metal Resistance. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 782–791. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Guo, L.; Long, M.; Huang, Y. Antimicrobial and disinfectant resistance of Escherichia coli isolated from giant pandas. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, L.; Ye, L.; Kromann, S.; Meng, H. Occurrence of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases, Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance, and Disinfectant Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli Isolated from Ready-To-Eat Meat Products. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2017, 14, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Iguchi, A.; Nagaya, Y.; Pradel, E.; Ooka, T.; Ogura, Y.; Katsura, K.; Kurokawa, K.; Oshima, K.; Hattori, M.; Parkhill, J.; et al. Genome Evolution and Plasticity of Serratia marcescens, an Important Multidrug-Resistant Nosocomial Pathogen. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 2096–2110. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Juhas, M.; Van Der Meer, J.R.; Gaillard, M.; Harding, R.M.; Hood, D.W.; Crook, D.W. Genomic islands: Tools of bacterial horizontal gene transfer and evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 376–393. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Mc Carlie, S.; Boucher, C.; Bragg, R. Molecular basis of bacterial disinfectant resistance. Drug Resist. Updat. 2020, 48, 100672. [Google Scholar]
  8. Verma, J.; Bag, S.; Saha, B.; Kumar, P.; Ghosh, T.S.; Dayal, M.; Senapati, T.; Mehra, S.; Dey, P.; Desigamani, A.; et al. Genomic plasticity associated with antimicrobial resistance in Vibrio cholerae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 6226–6231. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim, M.; Weigand, M.R.; Oh, S.; Hatt, J.K.; Krishnan, R.; Tezel, U.; Pavlostathis, S.G.; Konstantinidis, K.T. Widely used benzalkonium chloride disinfectants can promote antibiotic resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bertelli, C.; Tilley, K.E.; Brinkman, F.S.L. Microbial genomic island discovery, visualization and analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1685–1698. [Google Scholar]
  11. Langille, M.G.I.; Hsiao, W. genomic islands using bioinformatics approaches. llia. W.L.; Brinkman, F.S.L. Detecting genomic islands using bioinformatics approaches. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Soucy, S.M.; Huang, J.; Gogarten, J.P. Horizontal gene transfer: Building the web of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 472–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hacker, J.; Bender, L.; Ott, M.; Wingender, J.; Lund, B.; Marre, R.; Goebel, W. Deletions of chromosomal regions coding for fimbriae and hemolysins occur in vitro and in vivo in various extraintestinal Escherichia coli isolates. Microb. Pathog. 1990, 8, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Juhas, M.; Power, P.M.; Harding, R.M.; Ferguson, D.J.P.; Dimopoulou, I.D.; Elamin, A.R.E.; Mohd-Zain, Z.; Hood, D.W.; Adegbola, R.; Erwin, A.; et al. Sequence and functional analyses of Haemophilus spp. genomic islands. Genome Biol. 2007, 8, R237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bertelli, C.; Laird, M.R.; Williams, K.P.; Lau, B.Y.; Hoad, G.; Winsor, G.L.; Brinkman, F.S. IslandViewer 4: Expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, W30–W35. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, W.; Wang, A. Genomic islands mediate environmental adaptation and the spread of antibiotic resistance in multiresistant Enterococci-evidence from genomic sequences. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gilmour, M.W.; Graham, M.; Van Domselaar, G.; Tyler, S.; Kent, H.; Trout-Yakel, K.M.; Larios, O.; Allen, V.; Lee, B.; Nadon, C. High-throughput genome sequencing of two Listeria monocytogenes clinical isolates during a large foodborne outbreak. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kovacevic, J.; Ziegler, J.; Walecka-Zacharska, E.; Reimer, A.; Kitts, D.D.; Gilmour, M.W. Tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes to quaternary ammonium sanitizers is mediated by a novel efflux pump encoded by emrE. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 82, 939–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jiang, X.; Ren, S.; Geng, Y.; Yu, T.; Li, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, G.; Wang, H.; Shi, L. The sug operon involves in resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds in Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 7093–7104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mc Carlie, S.; Hellmuth, J.; Newman, J.; Boucher, C.E.; Bragg, R.R. Genome Sequence of Resistant Serratia sp. Strain HRI, Isolated from a Bottle of Didecyldimethylammonium Chloride-Based Disinfectant. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2020, 9, e00095-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Olson, R.D.; Assaf, R.; Brettin, T.; Conrad, N.; Cucinell, C.; Davis, J.J.; Dempsey, D.M.; Dickerman, A.; Dietrich, E.M.; Kenyon, R.W.; et al. Introducing the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC): A resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D678–D689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jia, B.; Raphenya, A.R.; Alcock, B.; Waglechner, N.; Guo, P.; Tsang, K.K.; Lago, B.A.; Dave, B.M.; Pereira, S.; Sharma, A.N.; et al. CARD 2017: Expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D566–D573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, J.; Chen, L.; Sun, L.; Yu, J.; Jin, Q. VFDB 2008 release: An enhanced web-based resource for comparative pathogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, D539–D542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mao, C.; Abraham, D.; Wattam, A.R.; Wilson, M.J.C.; Shukla, M.; Yoo, H.S.; Sobral, B.W. Curation, integration and visualization of bacterial virulence factors in PATRIC. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ho Sui, S.J.; Fedynak, A.; Hsiao, W.W.L.; Langille, M.G.I.; Brinkman, F.S.L. The association of virulence factors with genomic islands. PLoS One 2009, 4, e8094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dhillon, B.K.; Laird, M.R.; Shay, J.A.; Winsor, G.L.; Lo, R.; Nizam, F.; Pereira, S.K.; Waglechner, N.; McArthur, A.G.; Langille, M.G.I.; et al. IslandViewer 3: More flexible, interactive genomic island discovery, visualization and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W104–W108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Tatusova, T.; DiCuccio, M.; Badretdin, A.; Chetvernin, V.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Zaslavsky, L.; Lomsadze, A.; Pruitt, K.D.; Borodovsky, M.; Ostell, J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 6614–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Overbeek, R.; Olson, R.; Pusch, G.D.; Olsen, G.J.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Parrello, B.; Shukla, M.; et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D206–D214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brettin, T.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Olsen, G.J.; Olson, R.; Overbeek, R.; Parrello, B.; Pusch, G.D.; et al. RASTtk: A modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8365. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Vong, K.; Auclair, K. Understanding and overcoming aminoglycoside resistance caused by N-6′-acetyltransferase. Medchemcomm 2012, 3, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Feng, Z.; Liu, D.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Song, B.; Gu, L.; Fan, Z.; Yang, S.; et al. A Putative Efflux Transporter of the ABC Family, YbhFSR, in Escherichia coli Functions in Tetracycline Efflux and Na+(Li+)/H+ Transport. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 556. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, Q. TMBIM-mediated Ca2+ homeostasis and cell death. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2017, 1864, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Descheemaeker, P.; Chapelle, S.; Lammens, C.; Hauchecorne, M.; Wijdooghe, M.; Vandamme, P.; Ieven, M.; Goossens, H. Macrolide resistance and erythromycin resistance determinants among Belgian Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2000, 45, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Nishijima, T. Distribution of mefE and ermB genes in macrolide-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae and their variable susceptibility to various antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1999, 43, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, H.-H.; Lin, Y.-T.; Chen, P.-Y.; Li, L.-H.; Ning, H.-C.; Yang, T.-C. ClpA and HtpX Proteases Are Involved in Intrinsic Aminoglycoside Resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Are Potential Aminoglycoside Adjuvant Targets. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00554-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Basta, D.W.; Angeles-Albores, D.; Spero, M.A.; Ciemniecki, J.A.; Newman, D.K. Heat-shock proteases promote survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during growth arrest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 4358–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Xia, B.; Li, M.; Shi, J.; Long, Y.; Jin, Y.; Bai, F.; Cheng, Z.; Jin, S.; Wu, W. HigB Reciprocally Controls Biofilm Formation and the Expression of Type III Secretion System Genes through Influencing the Intracellular c-di-GMP Level in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Toxins 2018, 10, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wood, T.L.; Wood, T.K. The HigB/HigA toxin/antitoxin system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa influences the virulence factors pyochelin, pyocyanin, and biofilm formation. Microbiol. Open 2016, 5, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sánchez-López, E.; Gomes, D.; Esteruelas, G.; Bonilla, L.; Lopez-Machado, A.L.; Galindo, R.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Ettcheto, M.; Camins, A.; et al. Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Nigro, S.J.; Hall, R.M. Loss and gain of aminoglycoside resistance in global clone 2 Acinetobacter baumannii in Australia via modification of genomic resistance islands and acquisition of plasmids. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 2432–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Fu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, G.; Lin, Y.; Ramanathan, S.; Yang, G.; Lin, W.; Lin, X. The LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator YeeY Plays Important Roles in the Regulatory of Furazolidone Resistance in Aeromonas hydrophila. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 577376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tang, R.; Zhu, J.; Feng, L.; Li, J.; Liu, X. Characterization of LuxI/LuxR and their regulation involved in biofilm formation and stress resistance in fish spoilers Pseudomonas fluorescens. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 297, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chen, J.; Xie, J. Role and regulation of bacterial LuxR-like regulators. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011, 112, 2694–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Manjasetty, B.A.; Halavaty, A.S.; Luan, C.-H.; Osipiuk, J.; Mulligan, R.; Kwon, K.; Anderson, W.F.; Joachimiak, A. Loop-to-helix transition in the structure of multidrug regulator AcrR at the entrance of the drug-binding cavity. J. Struct. Biol. 2016, 194, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. The thioredoxin antioxidant system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 66, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Paulsen, I.T.; Skurray, R.A.; Tam, R.; Saier, M.H.; Turner, R.J.; Weiner, J.H.; Goldberg, E.B.; Grinius, L.L. The SMR family: A novel family of multidrug efflux proteins involved with the efflux of lipophilic drugs. Mol. Microbiol. 1996, 19, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cuthbertson, L.; Nodwell, J.R. The TetR Family of Regulators. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 440–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ramos, J.L.; Martínez-Bueno, M.; Molina-Henares, A.J.; Terán, W.; Watanabe, K.; Zhang, X.; Gallegos, M.T.; Brennan, R.; Tobes, R. The TetR Family of Transcriptional Repressors. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2005, 69, 326–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Circular map generated by IslandViewer4 depicting the location of genomic islands within the genome of Serratia sp. HRI. Orange bars represent GIs identified via the SIGI-HMM genomic island prediction software, blue bars are GIs identified via IslandPath-DIMOB program, and the integrated GIs identified via all programs used are represented by red bars. Adapted from IslandViewer4 [15].
Figure 1. Circular map generated by IslandViewer4 depicting the location of genomic islands within the genome of Serratia sp. HRI. Orange bars represent GIs identified via the SIGI-HMM genomic island prediction software, blue bars are GIs identified via IslandPath-DIMOB program, and the integrated GIs identified via all programs used are represented by red bars. Adapted from IslandViewer4 [15].
Microorganisms 11 00515 g001
Table 1. Summary of the properties of resistance islands of Serratia sp. HRI, including a selection of genes within the resistance islands identified by IslandViewer4.
Table 1. Summary of the properties of resistance islands of Serratia sp. HRI, including a selection of genes within the resistance islands identified by IslandViewer4.
Genomic IslandAntimicrobial Resistance GenesHypothetical ProteinsToxin-Antitoxin SystemsMobility GenesNon-Resistance Efflux GenesTranscriptional Regulators
117402 *905
18200010
2031001113
23110000
28110310
33150000
4213237 *1300
46150100
763282501
* 1 partial toxin–antitoxin system.
Table 2. Gene list of resistance island 11 of Serratia sp. HRI (1 370 193 bp–1 419 319 bp, GC content 49.2, size 49 126) identified by IslandViewer4. Gene function was annotated via RAST; any hypothetical or uncharacterised proteins were further analysed via NCBI PGAP and BLAST. Annotated drug resistance genes are highlighted in bold.
Table 2. Gene list of resistance island 11 of Serratia sp. HRI (1 370 193 bp–1 419 319 bp, GC content 49.2, size 49 126) identified by IslandViewer4. Gene function was annotated via RAST; any hypothetical or uncharacterised proteins were further analysed via NCBI PGAP and BLAST. Annotated drug resistance genes are highlighted in bold.
FunctionStartStopLength (bp)Annotation
1Periplasmic fimbrial chaperone StfD3764762
2Hypothetical protein7991455657Fimbrial protein (Serratia)
3Hypothetical protein14721966495Fimbrial protein (Serratia marcescens)
4MrfF19832474492
5Minor fimbrial subunit StfG24843014531
6Hypothetical protein31583697540LuxR C-terminal-related transcriptional regulator (Serratia marcescens)
7Hypothetical protein37153888174
8IS1 protein InsB42113969243
9Inner-membrane proton/drug antiporter (MSF type) of tripartite multidrug efflux system649642082289
10Transcriptional regulator, LysR family66377539903
11Colicin immunity protein PA098476458010366
12YpjF toxin protein86198251369
13Uncharacterized protein YagB90168678339
14UPF0758 family protein95269047480DNA repair protein RadC (Serratia marcescens)
15Hypothetical protein95419765225
16Hypothetical protein988710,069183
17FIG01222608: hypothetical protein10,56210,206357
18Hypothetical protein11,00810,697312
19Hypothetical protein11,32311,021303
20Hypothetical protein11,84511,342504
21Hypothetical protein12,57011,842729WYL-domain-containing protein (Serratia marcescens)
22Hypothetical protein13,00812,772237
23Hypothetical protein13,90313,019885
24Hypothetical protein14,46215,091630Inovirus Gp2 family protein (Serratia marcescens)
25Hypothetical protein15,21315,425213AlpA family phage regulatory protein (Serratia marcescens)
26Hypothetical protein15,47415,632159
27Hypothetical protein17,36615,7741593DUF3987-domain-containing protein (Serratia marcescens)
28Hypothetical protein17,39517,535141
29Hypothetical protein17,78417,963180ShlB/FhaC/HecB family hemolysin secretion/activation protein (unclassified Serratia)
30Hypothetical protein17,96018,208249
31Phosphoglycerate mutase (EC 5.4.2.11)18,24318,860618
32Il-IS_2, transposase19,28018,843438
33Hypothetical protein20,12519,277849SMP-30/gluconolactonase/LRE family protein (Serratia marcescens)
34Oxidoreductase, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family20,98820,122867
35Transcriptional regulator, LysR family21,13321,426294
36Mobile element protein22,12121,606516
37Insertion element IS401 (Burkholderia multivorans) transposase22,40022,173228
38Phage integrase22,83722,553285
39Phage-associated DNA N-6-adenine methyltransferase2323622,955282
40Hypothetical protein23,67723,531147
41Hypothetical protein23,83823,680159
42Hypothetical protein23,83723,971135
43Hypothetical protein24,12523,997129
44FIG01055438: hypothetical protein24,20824,387180
45Hypothetical protein24,45624,620165
46Hypothetical protein24,61724,71296
47Hypothetical protein24,70624,834129
48Hypothetical protein25,09424,936159
49Efflux transport system, outer membrane factor (OMF) lipoprotein25,47026,8851416
50ABC-type antimicrobial peptide transport system, permease component26,88528,0211137
51ABC-type antimicrobial peptide transport system, ATPase component28,03928,764726
52Probable Co/Zn/Cd efflux system membrane fusion protein28,77529,683909
532-hydroxy-3-keto-5-methylthiopentenyl-1-phosphate phosphatase related protein29,71530,416702
54Hydrolase, alpha/beta fold family30,41331,303891
55Permease of the drug/metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily31,30031,659360
56Permease of the drug/metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily31,66232,087426
57Hypothetical protein33,11832,228891
58FIG110192: hypothetical protein34,18433,1201065Peptidogalycan biosysnthesis protein (Serratia)
59Aminotransferase, class III35,560341841377
60Mobile element protein35,74335,856114
61Hypothetical protein36,92735,8691059ATP-binding protein (Serratia sp. HRI)
62Two-component transcriptional response regulator, LuxR family37,62436,929696
63Hypothetical protein37,94038,161222
64Core lipopolysaccharide phosphoethanolamine transferase EptC38,23639,9331698
65Two-component response regulator40,67240,502171
66Two-component response regulator40,94840,685264
67Hypothetical protein41,16641,032135
68Hypothetical protein42,46841,3951074RelA/SpoT-domain-containing protein (Serratia)
69Hypothetical protein42,75142,542210
70Hypothetical protein42,96542,822144
71Hydrolase, alpha/beta fold family43,88143,006876
72Monooxygenase, flavin-binding family45,40443,8781527
73Transcriptional regulator, AcrR family46,31045,717594
74Hypothetical protein46,42946,310120
75Hypothetical protein46,42846,628201
76MmcH46,64847,535888
77Hypothetical protein47,65747,857201
78Possible regulatory protein Trx47,87049,1261257
Table 3. Gene lists of genomic island 20 of Serratia sp. HRI (1 822 085 bp-1 869 515 bp, GC content 52.4, size 47 430 bp) identified via IslandViewer4. Gene function was annotated via RAST; any hypothetical or uncharacterised proteins were further analysed via NCBI PGAP and BLAST.
Table 3. Gene lists of genomic island 20 of Serratia sp. HRI (1 822 085 bp-1 869 515 bp, GC content 52.4, size 47 430 bp) identified via IslandViewer4. Gene function was annotated via RAST; any hypothetical or uncharacterised proteins were further analysed via NCBI PGAP and BLAST.
FunctionStartStopLength (bp)Annotation
1Conjugative transfer protein TrbK3263324
2Conjugative transfer protein TrbJ1082339744
3Conjugative transfer protein TrbE352910792451
4Conjugative transfer protein TrbD38113542270
5Conjugative transfer protein TrbC41943808387
6Conjugative transfer protein TrbB526141911071
7CopG-domain-containing protein57345258477
8Coupling protein VirD4, ATPase required for T-DNA transfer772857311998
9Transcriptional regulator, LysR family80348939906
10Hypothetical protein92219751531
11Transposase and inactivated derivatives979610,032237
12Small multidrug resistance family (SMR) protein10,57810,261318
13Probable lipoprotein10,90010,637264
14Transcriptional regulator, LysR family11,83810,933906
15Hypothetical protein13,33511,9321404TolC family protein
16Transcriptional regulator, TetR family13,44614,087642
17Probable Co/Zn/Cd efflux system membrane fusion protein14,08415,2501167MULTISPECIES: efflux RND transporter periplasmic adaptor subunit
18Hypothetical protein15,27518,3793105MULTISPECIES: efflux RND transporter permease subunit
19Hypothetical protein18,46018,807348MULTISPECIES: SMR family transporter
20Hypothetical protein18,82319,443621
21ABC transporter, permease protein (cluster 9, phospholipid)19,44020,5971158
22Mobile element protein21,90921,205705
23Integron integrase IntI121,90022,196297
24Mobile element protein22,57123,209639
25Transposase23,17626,1002925
26Beta-glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21)27,41826,1801239
27Putative polysaccharide export protein YccZ precursor27,38328,4711089
28Tyrosine-protein kinase (EC 2.7.10.2)28,73030,8922163
29Hypothetical protein30,93332,1711239
30Hypothetical protein32,19733,2041008
31Hypothetical protein33,22333,972750
32Poly(glycerol-phosphate) alpha-glucosyltransferase (EC 2.4.1.52)34,31535,256942
33Hypothetical protein35,28336,4191137
34UDP-galactopyranose mutase (EC 5.4.99.9)36,47437,6251152
35Low-molecular-weight protein-tyrosine-phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.48) => Etp38,00438,438435
36Tyrosine-protein kinase (EC 2.7.10.2)38,45040,6212172
37Hypothetical protein40,70241,8621161
38Hypothetical protein41,82843,2881461MULTISPECIES: aldo/keto reductase
39Glycosyltransferase43,27844,186909
40Glycosyl transferase, group 144,23345,2761044
41Glycosyltransferase45,35147,3001950
Table 4. Gene lists of genomic island 76 of Serratia sp. HRI (5 688 450 bp-5 725 416 bp, GC content: 44.0, Size: 36 966 bp) identified via IslandViewer4. Gene function was annotated via RAST; any hypothetical or uncharacterised proteins were further analysed via NCBI PGAP and BLAST.
Table 4. Gene lists of genomic island 76 of Serratia sp. HRI (5 688 450 bp-5 725 416 bp, GC content: 44.0, Size: 36 966 bp) identified via IslandViewer4. Gene function was annotated via RAST; any hypothetical or uncharacterised proteins were further analysed via NCBI PGAP and BLAST.
FunctionStartStopLength (bp)Annotation
1Hypothetical protein923411513Hypothetical protein (Serratia sp. SSNIH1)
2Polyketide synthase modules and related proteins412411223003
3Hypothetical protein43384222117
4Autoinducer synthase442455841161
5Hypothetical protein58596110252
6ABC-type multidrug transport system, permease component66686546123
7Hypothetical protein69696658312Multidrug efflux ABC transporter permease/ATP-binding subunit SmdA (Serratia marcescens) (WP_033641139.1)
8Hypothetical protein703282791248MbeB family mobilization protein (Serratia marcescens)
9MobA83788599222
10Small multidrug resistance family (SMR) protein86668998333
11Hypothetical protein91658995171GNAT family N-acetyltransferase (Serratia marcescens)
12Hypothetical protein93779207171
13Hypothetical protein97469531216
14Mobilization protein MobC10,18110,339159
15Hypothetical protein11,25810,875384
16Hypothetical protein11,37112,4471077
17Hypothetical protein13,80412,5121293Site-specific integrase (Serratia)
18Probable site-specific recombinase15,01113,8061206
19Transcriptional regulator, AlpA-like15,55015,344207
20Hypothetical protein16,51115,651861DUF6387 family protein (Serratia)
21Hypothetical protein16,69116,575117
22Hypothetical protein17,61716,709909DUF4760-domain-containing protein (Enterobacterales)
23Hypothetical protein17,97217,856117
24Hypothetical protein18,38819,4521065
25Repeat region19,39519,521127
26Replication protein20,78919,809981
27Hypothetical protein21,20220,993210
28Hypothetical protein21,22921,357129Conjugal transfer protein TraD (Yersinia)
29Hypothetical protein21,83621,384453
30Mobilization protein21,87123,1061236
31Hypothetical protein23,12123,711591tRNA modification GTPase (Yersinia enterocolitica)
32Restriction enzyme BcgI alpha chain-like protein (EC:2.1.1.72)23,76925,8052037
33Hypothetical protein25,84726,9411095
34YoeB toxin protein27,23526,981255
35YefM protein (antitoxin to YoeB)27,48327,232252
36Hypothetical protein27,66728,9591293
37Repeat region27,75727,883127
38Phage integrase28,95229,149198
39Type I restriction-modification system, restriction subunit R (EC 3.1.21.3)29,71530,176462
40Hypothetical protein30,94330,173771MFS transporter (Serratia)
41Hypothetical protein31,19131,382192GNAT family N-acetyltransferase (Paenibacillus xylanexedens)
42Hypothetical protein31,50231,41093Phytanoyl-CoA dioxygenase family protein (Serratia)
43Hypothetical protein31,70232,502801
44Nodulation protein nolO (EC 2.1.3.-)32,51234,3441833
45Hypothetical protein34,35534,492138
46Hypothetical protein34,49635,6021107G-D-S-L family lipolytic protein (Serratia)
47Hypothetical protein35,66236,9661305ATP-grasp-domain-containing protein (Serratia)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McCarlie, S.J.; Boucher, C.E.; Bragg, R.R. Genomic Islands Identified in Highly Resistant Serratia sp. HRI: A Pathway to Discover New Disinfectant Resistance Elements. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020515

AMA Style

McCarlie SJ, Boucher CE, Bragg RR. Genomic Islands Identified in Highly Resistant Serratia sp. HRI: A Pathway to Discover New Disinfectant Resistance Elements. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(2):515. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020515

Chicago/Turabian Style

McCarlie, Samantha J., Charlotte E. Boucher, and Robert R. Bragg. 2023. "Genomic Islands Identified in Highly Resistant Serratia sp. HRI: A Pathway to Discover New Disinfectant Resistance Elements" Microorganisms 11, no. 2: 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020515

APA Style

McCarlie, S. J., Boucher, C. E., & Bragg, R. R. (2023). Genomic Islands Identified in Highly Resistant Serratia sp. HRI: A Pathway to Discover New Disinfectant Resistance Elements. Microorganisms, 11(2), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11020515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop