Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization of Salmonella Phage Wara Isolated from River Water in Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Abundant Cyanobacteria in Autumn Adhering to the Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) in Shanghai
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reduced Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Diversity in Light and Moderate Fire Sites in Taiga Forests, Northeast China

1
Key Laboratory of Biodiversity, Institute of Natural Resources and Ecology, Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150040, China
2
Science and Technology Innovation Center, Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin 150028, China
3
Heilongjiang Huzhong National Nature Reserve, Huzhong 165038, China
4
Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Microbiology Technology, Ministry of Education & Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Resource Utilization for Cold Region & Key Laboratory of Microbiology, College of Heilongjiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(7), 1836; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071836
Submission received: 25 June 2023 / Revised: 12 July 2023 / Accepted: 17 July 2023 / Published: 19 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Forest fires are an important disturbance factor in forest ecosystems, and obviously change the soil environment. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, as a medium and bridge between vegetation and soil, play a crucial role in mediating plant nutrient uptake and regulating the productivity, stability, and succession of vegetation–soil systems. To investigate the effects of forest fires on the community structure and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in cold-temperate Larix gmelinii forests, we collected soils from light, moderate, and heavy fire disturbance forests and a natural forest as a control forest in Greater Khingan Larix gmelinii forests, in the northeast of China. The community structure and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was sequenced using Illumina MiSeq technology and we analyzed the correlation with the soil physicochemical characteristics. The results showed that the contents of microbial biomass content (MBC), moisture content (MC), total nitrogen (TN), and available phosphors (AP) increased significantly (p < 0.05) with increasing fire intensity (from Light to heavy fire), but available potassium (AK) decreased significantly (p < 0.05). These changes were not significant. A total of 14,554 valid sequences from all sequences were classified into 66 ASVs that belonged into one phylum, one order, four families, and four genera. The genera included Glomus, Ambispora, Paraglomus, and Acaulospora, and Glomus was the dominant genus (the genera with the five most relative abundances) in the control and heavy-fire forests. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis showed that forest fires significantly affected the community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (p < 0.01). Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that MBC, SOC, and AP contents significantly affected the composition structure and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities. This study indicated that forest fires affected the composition and diversity of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities through changing the soil physicochemical parameters (MBC, SOC, and AP) in cold-temperate Larix gmelinii forests. The study of soil physicochemical properties and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity in cold-temperate Larix gmelinii forests in the Greater Khingan Mountains after forest fires provides a reference basis for the revegetation and reconstruction of fire sites.

1. Introduction

Forest fires are one of the most important environmental factors affecting biodiversity and play a crucial role in maintaining the structure and function of forest ecosystems [1]. The impact of forest fires on soils is due to the high temperature, residual ash, and alteration of the original soil matrix and microclimate conditions, resulting in drastic changes in the soil physicochemical factors and causing significant disturbances in the soil environment [2]. Forest fires are capable of releasing elements from the soil in gaseous form and erosion [1], causing changes in the rate and flow of nutrient cycling in the soil [3]; forest fires alter the soil and also affect the composition and community dynamics of microorganisms [4], with consequent changes in the rate of decomposition and return of litter [5] and the function of forest ecosystems [6].
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are abundantly distributed in the soil [7] and can form reciprocal symbioses with most plant roots in the ecosystem [8]. On the one hand, they obtain nutrients from plants to complete their own growth and development [9]; on the other hand, they can also improve the host plant, improve the root surface area and inter-root absorption range of the host plant, and increase the ability to absorb water and nutrients from the soil, playing an important role in plant growth and development [5]. Previous studies showed that environmental factors obviously affected arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi growth and distribution [10,11,12]. Forest fires, as an important disturbance factor in forest ecosystems, have a profound effect on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi composition and function though changing soil nutrients, e.g., forest fires have a significant effect on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi infestation rate, species composition, density, and reproduction [13,14,15,16]. Moura [15] found that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi composition and diversity was influenced by soil pH and other nutrients; Pattinson [17] found that forest fires reduced arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi density in the top soil layer. After forest fires, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mycorrhizal symbionts can change the root morphology and improve the nutritional status of plants, thus promoting the growth and development of host plants, improving stress and disease resistance [18,19], participating in many physiological metabolic processes of plants [20], and indirectly contributing to forest restoration by regulating the inter-root microenvironment and microbial community structure of plants [21,22].
Forest fires can alter the structure and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities, but the response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities was not consistent in different geographical and climatic conditions, as well as forest types and soil conditions. Lots of studies on forest fires affecting soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have been carried out in temperate and tropical forests, such as in Brazil [15], Australia [17], and Iran [16], but studies on soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in different forest fire intensities in cold-temperate Larix gmelinii forests are still lacking. Therefore, we set forests with different forest fire intensities in Huzhong National Nature Reserve of China to investigate the changes in soil physicochemical properties and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community structure diversity under different fire intensities.
Huzhong National Nature Reserve is located in the Greater Khingan Mountains of China, and is a typical representative of the cold-temperate forest ecosystem, where Larix gmelinii forests are the climax zonal vegetation. Forest fires caused by lightning strikes are frequent in this reserve and cause forest succession and soil environment changes. At present, studies on post-fire forestry in the Greater Khingan Mountains have mainly focused on forest carbon storage [23], the restoration of above-ground vegetation [24], effects of soil bacterial communities [25], and soil black-carbon content [26]. However, studies on the changes of the structural composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities and soil physicochemical properties on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity in fire sites are still limited. Therefore, we used high-throughput technology to sequence soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Huzhong National Nature Reserve, and analyzed the changes in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community structure and diversity with different fire intensities. The aim was to investigate the influence of forest fires on the structure and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities in conifer forest soils, to disclose the key factors affecting arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in different fire intensities, and to provide a reference basis for forest revegetation and reconstruction during fire disturbance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Site Overview

This study was located at Huzhong National Nature Reserve (122°12′16.3″–122°21′7.8″ E, 53°26′30.6″–53°28′6.3″ N; Figure 1) in the Greater Khingan Mountains, which is the largest cold-temperate Larix gmelinii forest ecosystem in China. It is a continental monsoon climate with an average temperature of −2 to −5.5 °C and a record low of −52.3 °C [27]. The average annual precipitation is 480 mm, and the rainfall period is mostly concentrated in July–August, accounting for about 50–60% of the annual precipitation, with a frost-free period of about 130 d and an average altitude of 600–800 m [28]. The sample sites were selected from flat terrain undisturbed by anthropogenic activities and with complete vegetation restoration. The sample sites were selected from the fire sites with flat topography, undisturbed by human activities and with intact vegetation recovery.

2.2. Sample Plot

Light- (L), Moderate- (M), and Heavy (H)-fire forests were selected in the Huzhong Reserve in 2010, and adjacent forests with the same stand type without disturbances from fire were selected as control forests. Each forest set up three replicates and an area of 20 m × 20 m for each forest. The basic information of each forests is shown in Table 1.

2.3. Soil Sample Collection and Experimental Method

Ten soil samples were collected from 0 to 10 cm in each forest after removing humus and then mixed together into one soil sample (approximate 500 g per plot). The mixed soil samples passed through 2 mm sieve to remove plant roots and stones, and then placed in ziplock bags, backstroked in an ice box, and immediately brought to the laboratory. The soil samples were divided into two sub-parts in the laboratory, one stored at −80 °C for DNA extraction and another for determination of soil physicochemical properties.

2.4. Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Analysis

Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined using the carbon and nitrogen analyzer method [30], soil pH was determined using the potentiometric method [31], soil moisture content (MC) was determined with the drying method [32], soil available potassium (AK) was determined with the ammonium acetate leaching flame photometer method [33], Elementarvario ELIII (Germany) automatic carbon and nitrogen analyzer was used to determine soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) contents [34], soil available phosphorus (AP) was determined using the molybdenum antimony anti-colorimetric method [33], and soil alkaline available nitrogen (AN) was determined with the alkaline diffusion method [33].

2.5. DNA Extraction and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from fresh soil samples by weighing 0.25 g and following the procedure of E.Z.N.A.® Soil DNA Kit DNA (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). Using diluted genomic DNA as a template, specific primers with Barcode AML1F (5′-ATCAACTTTCGATGGTAGGATAGA-3′) and AML2R (5′-GAACCCAAACACTTTGGGTTTCC-3′) were selected as the first pair of primers; AMV4.5NF (5′-AAGCTCGTAGTTGAATTTCG-3′) and AMDGR (5′-CCCAACTATCCCTATTAATCAT-3′) were used as the second pair of primers to amplify the fungal 18S rRNA region. In the second round of PCR, the barcode primers (AMV4.5NF/AMDGR) were used to distinguish the different PCRs. The PCR reaction volumes were: 10 × Buffer 2.5 μL, template DNA (20 ng·L−1) 2.0 μL, dNTPs (2.5 mmol·L−1) 1.5 μL, specific dNTPs (2.5 mmol·L−1) 1.5 μL, Tag enzyme 1.0 μL. The PCR reaction conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 3 min; 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s, 30 cycles; 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified PCR products were quantified using Picogreen fluorometer, homogenized and mixed, and then sequenced by IlluminaMiseq on PE300 platform with 3 replicates for each sample. The raw data were uploaded to NCBI SRA database (sequence number: PRJNA945502).

2.6. Data Processing

The raw sequences were identified using Qiime2 [35] software, the raw downstream data of sequencing were initially screened according to sequence quality, the double-end sequences that passed the initial quality screening were pairwise concatenated according to overlapping bases using the software FLASH (V1.2.7), and the DADA2 [36] plug-in was used to optimize the sequences after quality control splicing. These were subjected to noise reduction, and species annotation was performed using the Naive bayes classifier with the Maarj AM database to obtain taxonomic information and to identify arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species. The diversity cloud analysis platform (Qiime2 process) (cloud.majorbio.com, accessed on 13 March 2023) of Shanghai Meiji Biomedical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) was used for subsequent data analysis.
Microbial community alpha diversity was characterized using Chao1 index (Chao1 richness estimator), Shannon–Wiener index (Shannon–Wiener index), and Simpson index (Simpson index) [34]. Data were organized and analyzed using Excel 2003 and SPSS 17.0. Two-sample t-test was used to analyze alpha diversity, NMDS ranking analysis based on Bray–Curtis distance was used to analyze beta diversity, and RDA analysis and Pearson’s method were used for environmental factor association analysis. All statistics were conducted with the “microeco” package R language and the figures were also finished using the “ggplot2” R language.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of the Difference in Physicochemical Properties of Soils in the Fire Intensities

The soil physicochemical properties (MBC, SOC, pH, AK, TN, SOC, AP, and AN) changed significantly in different fire intensities (p < 0.05) compared with the control forest (Table 2). Soil MBC, SOC, and MC in Light, moderate, and heavy fire intensities were higher than those in control forest; soil AK in Light, moderate, and heavy fire intensities was significantly lower compared with that in the control forest. Soil TN in Light and moderate did not change significantly compared to the control forest and only that in heavy fire intensities significantly increased compared with that in the control forest (p < 0.05).

3.2. Differential Analysis of Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Diversity in the Fire Sites

As shown in Figure 2, Light, moderate, and heavy fire intensities significantly decreased the Chao1 and Shannon indices of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi compared with those in the control forest (p < 0.05), but increased the Simpson index (p < 0.05) in the three fire intensities. Moreover, the Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson indices of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi did not change within the different fire intensities (p > 0.05) (Figure 2).
The result of NMDS analysis is shown in Figure 3, and the stress value was 0.042, lower than 0.05, indicating that the result was well representative. The Adonis analysis showed that the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community structures were significant different (R = 0.9475, p < 0.01) in different forest fire intensities. From the Figure 3, heavy fire intensity was relatively distant from Light and moderate, where the overlap between the elliptical areas of L (Light-fire) and M (Moderate-fire) forests was higher, indicating that the diversity and composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi were more similar under these two treatments, and also indicating that fire of different intensities had significant effects on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community composition.
As shown in Figure 4, the Bray–Curtis distance showed that the minimum distance of L (Light fire) and M (Moderate fire) was 0.56, indicating that the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community composition of L (Light fire) and M (Moderate fire) was similar, but the distance between CK (Control—blank) and L (Light fire), M (Moderate fire), and H (Heavy fire) groups was between 0.97 and 0.99, indicating that the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community composition between these fire treatments was significantly different.

3.3. Analysis of Differences in the Structural Composition of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Communities in Fire Trails

As seen in Figure 5, the total number of ASVs of the different fire intensities were 20 (Light fire), 16 (Moderate fire), and 20 (Heavy fire), which was lower than that in the control forest, and the numbers of ASVs specific to the forest were L (Light fire) > M (Moderate fire) > H (Heavy fire). The number of ASVs jointly owned with the control forest between fire groups were M (Moderate fire) > H (Heavy fire) > L (Light fire), the highest number of ASVs were jointly owned by L (Light fire) and M (Moderate fire) between fire groups, and the lowest number of ASVs were jointly owned by M (Moderate fire) and H (Heavy fire).
From Figure 6 and Table S1 in Supplementary Material, the dominant genus of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the fire sites of different intensities was Glomus (91.6~94.76%), followed by Ambispora (13.37~13.86%). The relative abundance of Glomus decreased in the fire group compared with the control group, while the relative abundance of Glomus increased after decreases between fire groups. In addition, Glomus was not detected in M (Moderate fire), and Acaulospora was detected only in CK (Control—blank). This shows that the community structure of L (Light fire) and M (Moderate fire) was more affected after the forest fire.

3.4. Correlation Analysis of Factors Influencing the Structure and Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Communities at the Fire Sites

The results of Pearson correlation analysis (Table 3) showed that the Chao1 diversity index was significantly negatively correlated with AP (p < 0.05), the Shannon diversity index was significantly negatively correlated with MBC (p < 0.01), and the Simpson diversity index was significantly positively correlated with MBC (p < 0.01) and negatively correlated with AK (p < 0.01), indicating that AP, MBC, and AK are important soil environmental factors affecting arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alpha diversity.
Redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed on the soil physicochemical properties for the community composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at the ASV. The first and second axes explained 91.91% and 2.16%, respectively, with a total explanation of 94.07% (Figure 7). The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities of L (Light fire) were positively correlated with AP, SOC, pH, MC, and MBC and negatively correlated with TN, AK, and AN. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities of M (Moderate fire) were positively correlated with AP, SOC, pH, and MBC, and negatively correlated with MC, TN, AK, and AN. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities of CK (Control—blank) and H (Heavy fire) were positively correlated with MC, TN, AK, and AN and negatively correlated with AP, SOC, pH, and MBC.
As shown in Table 4, soil AP, SOC, and MBC had significant (p < 0.05) effects on soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community composition, indicating that AP, SOC, and MBC were important factors affecting soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities.
Heatmap analysis of the correlation between genus and environmental factors at the genus level showed that Ambispora was significantly negatively correlated with soil MC content (p < 0.05) and significantly negatively correlated with soil TN content and soil AP content (p < 0.01), indicating that MC, TN, and AP were important factors affecting the genus composition of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi(Figure 8).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Fire on Soil Nutrient Content

After forest fires, some physical and chemical properties of forest soils, such as pH and organic carbon, were affected [37]. This result showed that there were significant differences in soil physicochemical properties between different fire intensities (Table 1), and the trend of increasing and then decreasing MBC and SOC with increasing fire intensity was consistent with previous reports [5,38], which may be due to the fact that moderate and Light fires can increase soil temperature, promote soil microbial activity, and accelerate soil organic matter formation [39], while high temperatures under heavy fires cause thermal decomposition of surface soil SOC, resulting in a decrease in organic matter input and, thus, a decrease in SOC content. As the intensity of a forest fire increases, the fire changes from a disturbance to a destructive factor and plant roots undergo apoptosis, leading to the disappearance of mycorrhizae, which reduces soil MBC and makes SOC depleted in gaseous form [40].
After the Light-intensity forest fires, the surface was exposed due to the burning of the surface litter and vegetation, which led to enhanced external erosion of the soil, causing weathering and scouring under the action of rainwater, resulting in a significant decrease in soil AK content [41]. The results of this study are consistent with the results of previous related studies [42]. In contrast, there was no significant difference between moderate and heavy fires in the results of this study, which may be due to the loss of K through particulate or non-particulate matter during combustion, and there was no longer enough AK released [43].
In the present study, soil AP content was elevated in all the fire sites, which is consistent with the results of a previous [44] related study, due to the positive response of soil from the conversion of some organic phosphorus compounds into inorganic phosphorus caused by forest fires [45,46].
The significant increase in soil MC changes, contrary to the results of Hart [1,47], could be attributed to the massive plant mortality due to the collapse of trees after forest fires. On the one hand, it can reduce plant transpiration and rainwater retention by the canopy [48], and on the other hand, with the decomposition of fallen trees, the density of fallen trees becomes smaller and the porosity increases to absorb more water [49], so it causes the soil MC value to increase.

4.2. Effect of Fire on Soil Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Diversity

It has been shown that fire has a large effect on the alpha diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [50]. In the present study, we found that the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Chao1 index of forest soil gradually increased with the increase in fire intensity (Figure 2). There may be four reasons: Firstly, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi have a faster growth rate [50,51]. Although fire reduces its biomass, the faster growth rate can make arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi recover quickly or even exceed the previous biomass; Secondly, forest fires can accelerate the decomposition of apoplastic matter, releasing more nutrients; Thirdly, forest fires can accelerate the decomposition of apoplankton, releasing more nutrients to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, resulting in a rapid increase in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi biomass [52,53]; Fourthly, forest fires change soil physicochemical properties to indirectly affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi survival [16], and it has been suggested that the alpha diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is significantly correlated with soil physicochemical properties, which is consistent with the results of this study [53,54]. In this study, Shannon and Simpson indices were found to be significantly correlated with MBC and AK, suggesting that changes in alpha diversity may be influenced by soil physicochemical factors. The Simpson index of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was the highest in moderate fire, while there was no significant difference between the Simpson index of heavy and Light fire (p > 0.05); this might be because the MBC values of the two soils of heavy and Light fire were closer, providing a more similar soil nutrient environment for the development and reproduction of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, resulting in no significant difference in the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.
Many studies have shown [16,55] that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi abundance and diversity vary with soil nutrient availability, and in the present study, we found that AK, MBC, and AP directly influenced the alpha diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soils with different fire intensities and were the main drivers, which is consistent with previous studies [16,54,55]. In our study, we found no significant correlation between the Chao1 index and Shannon index of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soils with different intensities of fire (Figure 2, p > 0.05), which may be due to the wide ecological niche of clumping mycorrhizal fungi, which can rapidly adapt to environmental changes under different fire levels [56,57].

4.3. Effect of Different Intensities of Fire on the Structural Composition of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Communities

It has been shown that fire can change the fungal species composition and promote the dominance of specific species or enhance the spectrum [15]. In the present study, Paraglomus were all present in soils burned at different intensities of fire, while Glomus, Ambispora, Acaulospora, and Archaeospora were not evenly distributed (Figure 6), which is consistent with other studies [58]. The most abundant Glomus was due to its strong environmental adaptability and unique reproductive characteristics, with a high spore production rate that allowed it to colonize different environments and be highly adaptable [59]. Their lighter relative abundance in the soil of moderate to Light fire sites may be due to the fact that Light fires reduce the number of Glomus propagules surviving on the soil surface [17], decreasing the species abundance and density of Glomus [16]; the heat increased during Moderate fire and was transferred to the soil, leading to the death of Glomus by scorching [60], while in the case of Heavy fire, a large amount of soil surface humus was burned out, which released a large amount of nutrients and was able to provide Glomus with the nutrients needed for growth and accelerate its growth [61].
It has been shown that physicochemical properties such as SOC, C/N, and MBC have significant effects on fungal community composition [62,63,64], and similar results were observed in the present study, where the community structure composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soil of the fire sites was significantly or highly correlated with MBC, SOC, and AP. The relative abundance of Ambispora was negatively correlated with MC, TN, and AP, probably because Ambispora is more sensitive to changes in soil physicochemical properties [65], which is consistent with the results reported in the literature [27,65,66].

5. Conclusions

Different intensities of fire affected both the community structure and diversity of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Fire significantly reduced the alpha diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in cold-temperate forest soils, and MBC, SOC, and AP were the main influencing factors in soil physicochemical properties. Fire altered the beta diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in cold-temperate forest soils, Glomus was the dominant taxon in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of the fire sites, and MC, TN, and AP were important soil physicochemical factors affecting the community structure composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11071836/s1, Table S1. Analysis of the variability of genus-level abundance at fire sites of different intensities.

Author Contributions

Z.C. and Y.L. organized the data and wrote the manuscript. S.W. helped with the literature search and analysis. X.S. and Y.L. revised the manuscript and edited the language. J.D. and L.Y. helped with field experiments. All co-authors contributed to the editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Forestry and grassland ecological protection and restoration funds project (GZCG2023-024); Foundation of Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences (KY2023ZR03); The Special Project of the Central Government to Guide Local Science and Technology Development (ZY20B15).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hart, S.; Deluca, T.H.; Newman, G.S.; Mackenzie, M.D.; Boyle, S.I. Post-fire vegetative dynamics as drivers of microbial community structure and function in forest soils. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 220, 166–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Agbeshie, A.A.; Abugre, S.; Atta-Darkwa, T.; Awuah, R. A review of the effects of forest fire on soil properties. J. For. Res. 2022, 33, 1419–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hamman, S.T.; Burke, I.C.; Knapp, E.E. Soil nutrients and microbial activity after early and late season prescribed burns in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Treseder, K.K.; Mack, M.C.; Cross, A. Relationships among fires, Fungi, and soil dynamics in Alaskan boreal forests. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14, 1826–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, G.Y.; Zhang, L.P.; Wei, M.F.; Zhen, L. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, organic fertilizer and soil sterilization on maize growth. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2011, 31, 192–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ajmal, R.; Ashis, B. Fire-induced geochemical changes in soil: Implication for the element cycling. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 868, 161714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Orchid mycorrhizas. In Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 349–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, B.; Qiu, Y.L. Phylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants. Mycorrhiza 2006, 16, 299–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Balestrini, R.; Brunetti, C.; Chitarra, W.; Nerva, L. Photosynthetic Traits and Nitrogen Uptake in Crops: Which Is the Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi? Plants 2020, 9, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, M.; Shi, Z.; Xu, X.; Wang, X. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Associated with Roots Reveal High Diversity Levels at Different Elevations in Tropical Montane Rainforests. Diversity 2022, 14, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Djighaly, P.I.; Ngom, D.; Diagne, N.; Fall, D.; Ngom, M.; Diouf, D.; Hocher, V.; Laplaze, L.; Champion, A.; Farrant, J.M.; et al. Effect of Casuarina Plantations Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Frankia on the Diversity of Herbaceous Vegetation in Saline Environments in Senegal. Diversity 2020, 12, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yin, Z.P.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, N.; Shi, Y.C.; Li, T.; Zhao, Z.W. Differential responses of 23 maize cultivar seedlings to an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus when grown in a metal-polluted soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 789, 14805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Marshall, A.; Waller, L.; Lekberg, Y. Cascading effects of fire retardant on plant-microbe interactions, community composition, and invasion. Ecol. Appl. 2016, 26, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Longo, S.; Nouhra, E.; Goto, B.T.; Berbara, R.L.; Urcelay, C. Effects of fire on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the Mountain Chaco Forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 315, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moura, J.B.; Souza, R.F.; Vieira-Júnior, W.G.; Lucas, L.S.; Santos, J.M.; Silva, S.D.E.; Marin, C. Effects of a megafire on the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community and parameters in the Brazilian Cerrado ecosystem. For. Syst. 2022, 31, e001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mirzaei, J.; Heydari, M.; Omidipour, R.; Jafarian, N.; Carcaillet, C. Decrease in Soil Functionalities and Herbs’ Diversity, but Not That of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Linked to Short Fire Interval in Semi-Arid Oak Forest Ecosystem, West Iran. Plants 2023, 12, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pattinson, G.S.; Hammill, K.A.; Sutton, B.G.; Mcgee, P.A. Simulated fire reduces the density of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at the soil surface. Mycol. Res. 1999, 103, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Miozzi, L.; Vaira, A.M.; Catoni, M.; Fiorilli, V.; Acctotto, G.P.; Lanfranco, L. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis: Plant Friend or Foe in the Fight Against Viruses? Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, S.; Shi, Z.; Chen, X.; Gao, J.; Wang, X. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase crop yields by improving biomass under rainfed condition: A meta-analysis. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bedini, A.; Mercy, L.; Schneider, C.; Franken, P.; Lucic-Mercy, E. Unraveling the initial plant hormone signaling, metabolic mechanisms and plant defense triggering the endomycorrhizal symbiosis behavior. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Luo, Q.Y.; Wang, X.J.; Li, Y.Y.; Lin, S.S.; Sun, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Q.; Jin, L. Mechanism of biological control to plant diseases using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2013, 33, 5997–6005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jiang, Y.J.; Luan, L.; Hu, K.J.; Liu, M.Q.; Chem, Z.Y.; Geisen, S.; Chen, X.Y.; Li, H.X.; Xu, Q.S.; Bonkowski, M.; et al. Trophic interactions as determinants of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community with cascading plant-promoting consequences. Microbiome 2020, 8, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Y.; Luo, T.; Li, S.; Liu, B. Modeling Optimal Forest Rotation Age for Carbon Sequestration in the Great Khingan Mountains of Northeast China. Forests 2022, 13, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhong, C.; Guo, M.; Zhou, F.; Li, J.; Yu, F.; Guo, F.; Li, W. Forest succession trajectories after fires in valleys and on slopes in the Greater Khingan Mountains, China. J. For. Res. 2023, 34, 623–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiang, X.J.; Shi, Y.; Yang, J.; Kong, J.J.; Lin, X.G.; Zhang, H.Y.; Zeng, J.; Chu, H.Y. Rapid recovery of soil bacterial communities after wildfire in a Chinese boreal forest. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Huang, W.; Hu, Y.; Chang, Y.; Liu, M.; Li, Y.; Ren, B.; Shi, S. Effects of Fire Severity and Topography on Soil Black Carbon Accumulation in Boreal Forest of Northeast China. Forests 2018, 9, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yu, Y.Y.; Li, M.S.; Liu, X.L.; Yin, W.P.; Li, G.F.; Mu, L.Q.; Cui, X.Y.; Cheng, Z.C. Soil bacterial community composition and diversity of typical permafrost in Greater Khingan Mountains. Microbiol. China 2020, 47, 2759–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, L.B.; Jiang, Y.B.; Zhou, T.; Cui, F.X.; Zhu, D.G.; Xu, F. Effects of litter fall on soil fungal diversity under snow cover in the Greater Xing’an Mountains. Res. Environ. Sci. 2022, 35, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yue, X.; Dun, X.J.; Cui, D.J.; Guo, X.D.; Song, X.Y.; Liu, L.; Wang, L.L.; Jiang, C.; Xu, J.W.; Li, S.M. Effects of Different Fire Intensities on Forest Soil Nutrients. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2018, 50, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shang, W.; Wu, X.D.; Zhao, L.; Yue, G.Y.; Zhao, Y.H.; Qiao, Y.P.; Li, Y.Q. Seasonal variations in labile soil organic matter fractions in permafrost soils with different vegetation types in the Central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Catena 2016, 137, 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, H.M.; Jung, J.Y.; Yergeau, E.; Hwang, C.Y.; Hinzman, L.; Nam, S.; Hong, S.G.; Kim, O.S.; Chun, J.; Lee, Y.K. Bacterial community structure and soil properties of a subarctic tundra soil in Council, Alaska. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014, 89, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wear, E.K.; Wilbanks, E.G.; Nelson, C.E.; Carlson, C.A. Primer selection impacts specific population abundances but not community dynamics in a monthly time-series 16S rRNA gene amplicon analysis of coastal marine bacterioplankton. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 2709–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Ade, L.J.; Hu, L.; Zi, H.B.; Wang, C.T.; Lerdau, M.; Dong, S.K. Efect of snowpack on the soil bacteria of alpine meadows in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau of China. Catena 2018, 164, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, W.G.; Zhang, Q.; Li, D.Y.; Cheng, G.; Mu, J.; Wu, Q.B.; Niu, F.; An, L.Z.; Feng, H.Y. Diversity and community structure of fungi through a permafrost core profle from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of China. J. Basic Microbiol. 2015, 54, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Callahan, B.J.; Mcmurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Xue, L.; Li, Q.; Chen, H. Effects of a Wildfire on Selected Physical, Chemical and Biochemical Soil Properties in a Pinus massoniana Forest in South China. Forests 2014, 5, 2947–2966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Johnson, D.L.; Curtis, P.S. Effects of forest management on soil C and N storage: Meta analysis. For. Ecol. Manag. 2001, 140, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, C.; Morrissey, E.M.; Mau, R.L.; Hayer, M.; Pineiro, J.; Mack, M.C.; Marks, J.C.; Bell, S.L.; Miller, S.N.; Schwartz, E.; et al. The temperature sensitivity of soil: Microbial biodiversity, growth, and carbon mineralization. ISME J. 2021, 15, 2738–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Neary, D.G.; Klopatek, C.C.; DeBano, L.F.; Ffolliott, P.F. Fire effects on belowground sustainability: A review and synthesis. For. Ecol. Manag. 1999, 122, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, J.; Qiu, L.P.; Wang, X.; Wei, X.R.; Gao, H.L.; Zhang, Y.J.; Cheng, Z.M. Effects of wildfire and topography on soil nutrients in a semiarid restored grassland. Plant Soil 2018, 428, 123–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mcintosh, P.D.; Laffan, M.D.; Hewitt, A.E. The role of fire and nutrient loss in the genesis of the forest soils of Tasmania and southern New Zealand. For. Ecol. Manag. 2005, 220, 185–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kugbe, J.; Fosu, M.; Vlek, P.L. Impact of season, fuel load and vegetation cover on fire mediated nutrient losses across sa-vanna agro-ecosystems: The case of northern Ghana. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2015, 102, 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Romanya, J.; Khanna, P.K.; Raison, R.J. Effects of slash burning on soil phosphorus fractions and sorption and desorption of phosphorus. For. Ecol. Manag. 1994, 65, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Scharenbroch, B.C.; Nix, B.; Jacobs, K.A.; Bowles, M.L. Two decades of low-severity prescribed fire increases soil nutrient availability in a Midwestern, USA oak (Quercus) forest. Geoderma 2012, 183–184, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cade-Menun, B.J.; Berch, S.M.; Preston, C.M.; Lavkulich, L.M. Phosphorus forms and related soil chemistry of Podzolic soils on northern Vancouver Island. II. The effects of clear-cutting and burning. Can. J. For. Res 2000, 30, 1726–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, C.G.; Shin, K.; Joo, K.Y.; Lee, K.S.; Shin, S.S.; Choung, Y. Effects of soil conservation measures in a partially vegetated area after forest fires. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 399, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, J.; Fu, B.J. The impact of land use on spatial and temporal distribution of soil moisture on the Loess Plateau. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2000, 55, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yang, L.B.; Cui, F.X.; Huang, Q.Y.; Zhu, D.G.; Xu, F. Analysis on bacterial diversity and composition of Larixg melinii fallen wood with different decomposition levels. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2021, 41, 93–100+182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xiang, X.; Gibbons, S.M.; Yang, J. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities show low resistance and high resilience to wildfire disturbance. Plant Soil 2015, 397, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rashid, A.; Ahmed, T.; Ayub, N.; Khan, A.G. Effect of forest fire on number, viability and post-fire re-establishment of arbuscular mycorrhizae. Mycorrhiza 1997, 7, 217–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhou, S.X.; Butenschoen, O.; Barantal, S.; Handa, I.T.; Makkonen, M.; Vos, V.; Aerts, R.; Berg, M.P.; McKie, B.; Van Ruijven, J.; et al. Decomposition of leaf litter mixtures across biomes: The role of litter identity, diversity and soil fauna. J. Ecol. 2020, 108, 2283–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gałązka, A.; Niedźwiecki, J.; Grządziel, J.; Gawryjołek, K. Evaluation of Changes in Glomalin-Related Soil Proteins (GRSP) Content, Microbial Diversity and Physical Properties Depending on the Type of Soil as the Important Biotic Determinants of Soil Quality. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, Q.; Xiang, X.J.; Du, Y.G.; Li, Y.K.; Li, L.; Zhang, F.W.; Guo, X.W.; Cao, G.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure following different grazing intensities in alpine grassland. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2020, 85, 1620–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, X.C.; Ceng, Q.H.; Zhang, H.G.; Bian, C.Y.; Chen, H.Y.H.; Jiang, D.L.; Xu, X. Global negative effects of nutrient enrichment on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, plant diversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. New Phytol. 2020, 229, 2957–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Bebber, D.P.; Chaloner, T.M. Specialists, generalists and the shape of the ecological niche in fungi. New Phytol. 2022, 234, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Millar, N.S.; Bennett, A.E. Stressed out symbiotes: Hypotheses for the influence of abiotic stress on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Oecologia 2016, 182, 625–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Wang, X.; Gao, S.H.; Chen, J.Q.; Yao, Z.W.; Zhang, X.D. Reducing soil CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions through management of harvest residues in Chinese fir plantation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 511, 120140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, S.; Pan, S.; Shah, G.M.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, L.; Yang, S. Enhancement in arsenic remediation by maize (Zea mays L.) using edta in combination with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2018, 16, 5987–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cairney, J.W.G.; Bastias, B.A. Influences of Fire on Forest Soil Fungal Communities. Can. J. For. Res. 2007, 37, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ito, A. Mega fire emissions in Siberia: Potential supply of bioavailable iron from forests to the ocean. Biogeosciences 2011, 8, 1679–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Yang, H.Y.; Zhao, X.Y.; Liu, C.L.; Bai, L.; Zhao, M.; Li, L.L. Diversity and characteristics of colonization of root-associated fungi of Vaccinium uliginosum. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Yao, Q.; Liu, J.J.; Yu, Z.H.; Li, Y.S.; Jin, J.; Liu, X.B.; Wang, G.H. Three years of biochar amendment alters soil physiochemical properties and fungal community composition in a black soil of northeast China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 110, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, J.J.; Zhang, H.W.; Li, X.Y.; Su, Z.C.; Li, X.; Xu, M.K. Effects of tillage and residue incorporation on composition and abundance of microbial communities of a fluvo-aquic soil. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2014, 65, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Posada, R.H.; De Prager, M.; Heredia-Abarca, G.; Sieverding, E. Effects of soil physical and chemical parameters, and farm management practices on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities and diversities in coffee plantations in Colombia and Mexico. Agrofor. Syst. 2018, 92, 555–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Huang, R.L.; Crowther, T.W.; Sui, Y.Y.; Sun, B.; Liang, Y.T. High stabiligy and metabolic capacity of bacterial community promote the rapid reduction of easily decomposing carbon in soil. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The asterisk indicates the study site in Heilongjiang Province and China.
Figure 1. The asterisk indicates the study site in Heilongjiang Province and China.
Microorganisms 11 01836 g001
Figure 2. Alpha diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities in soils with different fire intensities. All results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters within a row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05; ANOVA) among the different intensities of fire in this study.
Figure 2. Alpha diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities in soils with different fire intensities. All results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters within a row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05; ANOVA) among the different intensities of fire in this study.
Microorganisms 11 01836 g002
Figure 3. NMDS plot of the soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ASV based on Bray–Curtis metrics among all samples. CK, Control—blank; L, Light fire; M, Moderate fire; H, Heavy fire.
Figure 3. NMDS plot of the soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ASV based on Bray–Curtis metrics among all samples. CK, Control—blank; L, Light fire; M, Moderate fire; H, Heavy fire.
Microorganisms 11 01836 g003
Figure 4. Bray–Curtis distance between soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities.
Figure 4. Bray–Curtis distance between soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities.
Microorganisms 11 01836 g004
Figure 5. Venn diagram of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ASVs. CK, Control—blank; L, Light fire; M, Moderate fire; H, Heavy fire.
Figure 5. Venn diagram of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ASVs. CK, Control—blank; L, Light fire; M, Moderate fire; H, Heavy fire.
Microorganisms 11 01836 g005
Figure 6. Genus-level composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi detected in the forest soil at different latitudes. CK, Control—blank; L, Light fire; M, Moderate fire; H, Heavy fire.
Figure 6. Genus-level composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi detected in the forest soil at different latitudes. CK, Control—blank; L, Light fire; M, Moderate fire; H, Heavy fire.
Microorganisms 11 01836 g006
Figure 7. Correlations between soil physicochemical properties and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Genus (RDA). CK, Control—blank; L, Light fire; M, Moderate fire; H, Heavy fire.
Figure 7. Correlations between soil physicochemical properties and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Genus (RDA). CK, Control—blank; L, Light fire; M, Moderate fire; H, Heavy fire.
Microorganisms 11 01836 g007
Figure 8. Correlation heatmap of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Genus and soil physicochemical properties. Note: the x-axis and y-axis are soil environmental and species, respectively. The p-value is shown in different colors in the figure. If the p-value is less than 0.05, it is marked with an * sign, * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 8. Correlation heatmap of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Genus and soil physicochemical properties. Note: the x-axis and y-axis are soil environmental and species, respectively. The p-value is shown in different colors in the figure. If the p-value is less than 0.05, it is marked with an * sign, * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
Microorganisms 11 01836 g008
Table 1. Basic situation of fire sites with different intensities. L, M, and H indicate Light, moderate, and heavy fire intensities, respectively [29].
Table 1. Basic situation of fire sites with different intensities. L, M, and H indicate Light, moderate, and heavy fire intensities, respectively [29].
Fire IntensityBurning Dead Wood RatioChanges in Surface Vegetation
L (Light fire)≤30%Only some of the vegetation was burned
M (Moderate fire)30–70%Trees were partially burned, shrubs, herbs, and other vegetation were completely burned
H (Heavy fire)≥70%Trees, shrubs, herbs, and other vegetation were completely burned to death
Table 2. Physical and chemical properties of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in forest soils with three different fire intensities. All results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters within a row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05; ANOVA) among the different intensities of fire in this study.
Table 2. Physical and chemical properties of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in forest soils with three different fire intensities. All results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters within a row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05; ANOVA) among the different intensities of fire in this study.
IntensityMBC mg/kgMC%pHAK mg/kgTN g/kgSOC g/kgAP mg/kgAN mg/kg
CK (Control—blank)149.97 ± 33.56 c0.04 ± 0.004 c6.79 ± 0.03 a213.05 ± 19.19 a1.69 ± 0.01 b97.05 ± 3.41 b11.74 ± 0.69 c96.14 ± 11.33 b
L (Light fire)268.37 ± 23.67 b0.16 ± 0.002 b6.64 ± 0.02 a140.07 ± 5.2 b1.95 ± 0.06 b122.98 ± 5.96 a46.9 ± 0.83 a89.37 ± 12.31 b
M (Moderate fire)847.07 ± 369.5 a0.12 ± 0.006 b6.53 ± 0.05 a80.43 ± 6.38 c1.71 ± 0.06 b93.16 ± 6.49 b18.21 ± 0.66 c82.13 ± 24.22 b
H (Heavy fire)349.99 ± 12.5 b0.27 ± 0.03 a5.84 ± 0.4 b80.97 ± 11.17 c2.96 ± 0.43 a76.06 ± 3.24 c27.48 ± 1.57 b148.16 ± 17.29 a
Table 3. Correlation coefficients of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alpha diversity indices and soil chemical factors. If the p-value is less than 0.05, it is marked with an * sign, * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
Table 3. Correlation coefficients of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alpha diversity indices and soil chemical factors. If the p-value is less than 0.05, it is marked with an * sign, * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
NameMBCMCpHAKTNSOCAPAN
Chao1−0.531−0.4220.160.446−0.4078−0.109−0.629 *−0.134
Shannon−0.741 **−0.3480.2280.692 *−0.3210.021−0.4160.006
Simpson0.727 **0.369−0.179−0.734 **0.251−0.0070.391−0.119
Table 4. Significance tests between soil physicochemical properties and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community structures. If the p-value is less than 0.05, it is marked with an * sign, * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
Table 4. Significance tests between soil physicochemical properties and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community structures. If the p-value is less than 0.05, it is marked with an * sign, * 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01.
Soil FactorsR2p-Value
MBC0.78390.004 **
MC0.08710.681
pH0.10620.604
AK0.18060.414
TN0.23250.3
SOC0.54920.035 *
AP0.70230.006 **
AN0.33290.158
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, Z.; Wu, S.; Du, J.; Liu, Y.; Sui, X.; Yang, L. Reduced Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Diversity in Light and Moderate Fire Sites in Taiga Forests, Northeast China. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071836

AMA Style

Cheng Z, Wu S, Du J, Liu Y, Sui X, Yang L. Reduced Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Diversity in Light and Moderate Fire Sites in Taiga Forests, Northeast China. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(7):1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071836

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, Zhichao, Song Wu, Jun Du, Yongzhi Liu, Xin Sui, and Libin Yang. 2023. "Reduced Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Diversity in Light and Moderate Fire Sites in Taiga Forests, Northeast China" Microorganisms 11, no. 7: 1836. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071836

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop