Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Trichomonas vaginalis Infection in Women Screened for Precursor Lesions of Cervical Cancer in a Brazilian Population
Previous Article in Journal
Interplay between Lung Diseases and Viral Infections: A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protective Effects of Huo Xiang Zheng Qi Liquid on Clostridioides difficile Infection on C57BL/6 Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Insecticidal Activity of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Streptomyces sp. SA61 against Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)

1
College of Plant Protection, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
2
Biological Invasions Center, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110866, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(10), 2031; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102031
Submission received: 2 September 2024 / Revised: 3 October 2024 / Accepted: 7 October 2024 / Published: 8 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Natural Products against Pathogens)

Abstract

:
Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood poses a significant threat to vegetable and ornamental crops in temperate zones, resulting in notable reductions in yield and substantial economic burdens. In order to find compounds with high insecticidal activity against T. vaporariorum, five compounds were isolated and identified from the crude extract of Streptomyces sp. SA61. These include three new polyketides, named strekingmycins F–H (13); one new diterpenoid, named phenalinolactone CD8 (4); and one known compound, strekingmycin A (5). Their structures were analyzed using high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and one-dimensional and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy data and by comparing them with previously reported data. The insecticidal activities of compounds 15 against T. vaporariorum were evaluated. Among them, compound 5 exhibited the highest insecticidal activity, with an LC50 of 6.949 mg/L against T. vaporariorum at 72 h using the leaf-dip method. Lower insecticidal activities were found in compounds 14, with LC50 values of 22.817, 19.150, 16.981 and 41.501 mg/L, respectively. These data indicate that strekingmycin could be a potential candidate for a novel insecticide to control T. vaporariorum.

1. Introduction

The Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood, belonging to the family Aleyrodidae within the order Hemiptera, commonly referred to as the greenhouse whitefly, represents a significant agricultural pest influencing a broad kind of vegetable as well as horticultural crops, particularly in the temperate zones globally [1,2]. It can attack approximately 859 host plant species, which belong to 469 genera in 121 families, demonstrating its adaptability polyphagy [3]. T. vaporariorum poses a threat to crops through its feeding behavior; the secretion of honeydew that serves as a substrate for fungi, which in turn affects photosynthesis; and its ability to transmit viruses, further compounding the damage inflicted on the plants [4,5,6,7]. Currently, the control of this pest primarily relies on chemical agents such as neonicotinoids, organophosphates, and novel nicotine-based insecticides [8,9,10]. However, the widespread use of synthetic insecticides for managing T. vaporariorum populations has led to significant resistance among these pests to a broad range of traditional insecticidal classes, resulting in a decline in the effectiveness of these conventional insecticides [11,12,13]. This phenomenon underscores the necessity for alternative, sustainable approaches to whitefly control that can circumvent the challenges posed by resistance development. Thus, there is a constant demand for novel insecticides to combat the damaging effects of T. vaporariorum.
Natural compounds boast an extensive heritage serving as a rich repository for bioactive constituents and as a catalyst for the development of numerous pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals [14]. Their extensive spectrum of biological actions, coupled with a plethora of structural variations, underpins their significance in these domains [15,16]. Actinomycetes are renowned for their capacity to generate an extensive array of biologically active secondary metabolites, which have garnered significant applications across various sectors, including industrial processes, medical fields, and agricultural practices. Their ability to produce these diverse compounds positions them as invaluable resources for the development of novel pharmaceuticals, agricultural antibiotics, and other bioactive agents that can address a multitude of challenges in these domains [17].
In our study, the fermentation of Streptomyces sp. SA61 and purification of the products led to the isolation of three new polyketides, strekingmycins F–H (13), and one new diterpene, phenalinolactone CD8 (4). The results of the insecticidal bioassay revealed that all the tested compounds demonstrated moderate-to-strong lethal activity against T. vaporariorum (assessed using the leaf-dip method). These findings provide new resources for the development of new microbial insecticides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Experimental Procedures

The measurement of optical rotation was conducted under the ATAGO AP-300 polarimeter, manufactured by Atago in Tokyo, Japan. For nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectral acquisition, an Avance-600 Bruker NMR spectrometer, which is produced by Bruker in Karlsruhe, Germany, was utilized under ambient temperature conditions. The chemical shifts were referenced against the carbon and remaining proton signals of chloroform-d (CDCl3, with δC 77.0 and δH 7.26) and methanol-d4 (CD3OD, with δC 49.0 and δH 3.30). HRESIMS data were obtained by using a Waters Xevo G2-XS quadrupole-time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) for spectral analysis. Column chromatography was performed using 100–200-mesh and 200–300-mesh silica gel produced by Qingdao Ocean Spectrum Separation Material Co., Ltd., in Qingdao, China. Additionally, Sephadex LH-20 was employed, which was obtained from GE Healthcare, located in Uppsala, Sweden. Analyses via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were executed on an Agilent 1260 series instrument, equipped with a ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column (dimensions: 250 × 4.6 mm, particle size: 5 μm, by Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). For semipreparative scale HPLC separations, an identical Agilent 1260 series system was employed but with a ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column of larger dimensions (250 × 9.4 mm, particle size: 5 μm, by Agilent). The chemical reagents utilized throughout this research were procured from a supplier, Tianjin Fuyu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., located in Tianjin, China.

2.2. Actinomycete Material

The SA61 strain was isolated from the intestinal tract of earthworms collected at Shenyang Agricultural University, which is located in Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, China [18]. The SA61 strain (GenBank accession no. OR126165) was identified as belonging to the genus Streptomyces through morphological analysis (Figure S1) and 16S rRNA sequence analysis (Figure S2) and was stored at China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) under the accession number of CGMCC No.20306.

2.3. Insect Cultures

The initial stock of adult T. vaporariorum utilized in this study was obtained from the Laboratory of Insect–Microbe Symbiosis at Shenyang Agricultural University. T. vaporariorum was raised on tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum CV. Jiyan-9) (Nicotiana: Solanaceae) within a controlled greenhouse environment. The conditions were maintained at a temperature of 27 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 5% humidity, and a photoperiod of 14:12 (light–dark (L:D)). Newly emerged adults were randomly selected for testing.

2.4. Fermentation and Extraction

For the subsequent fermentation process, the Streptomyces sp. SA61 strain was cultivated on Gause’s No. 1 synthetic agar medium (GS) [19] at 28 °C under the condition of darkness lasting for 7 days. A spore suspension of the cultured strain was prepared using sterile water. Quantitative spore suspensions were added to test tubes (10 × 100 mm), each containing 5 mL of medium ISP2 [20], and incubated at 28 °C while shaking (180 rpm) for 48 h. Subsequently, these mycelial suspensions were moved to 250 mL flasks, each containing 50 mL of medium ISP2, and agitated for 48 h to initiate the seed culture preparation. Ultimately, the seed cultures were transferred into flasks (2 L), each containing 400 mL of medium F [18] supplemented with 16 g of Amberlite XAD-16 resin. After shaking the culture at 28 °C and 180 rpm for 7 d, the fermentation broth was collected to a volume of 48 L. Then, the fermentation broth was washed repeatedly with water, and the resin was collected. The resin was initially subjected to oven-drying at a temperature of 30 °C to eliminate residual moisture, followed by a quadruple extraction process using methanol (MeOH). Subsequently, the MeOH extract was distilled under reduced pressure and dissolved in the a in a 1:1 ratio (0.6 L) in a solution of MeOH and H2O. The solution underwent four successive extractions using an equal volume of dichloromethane (CH2Cl2). The pooled CH2Cl2 extracts were subsequently concentrated through the application of a rotary evaporation apparatus, yielding 15 g of the crude extract.

2.5. Isolation and Purification

The crude extract (15g) was fractionated by normal-phase silica gel column (dimensions: 350 × 25 mm i.d.), employing a stepwise elution strategy utilizing CH2Cl2–MeOH mixtures (ratios ranging from 100:0 to 1:1, with each gradient constituting 2 L) as the eluent. Four fractions (A–D) were obtained by pooling similar compounds based on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis. Fraction A underwent further purification via a Sephadex LH-20 column, employing a mixture of petroleum ether, dichloromethane, and methanol (in a ratio of 2:1:1) as the eluent, to eliminate impurities. Then, reversed-phase semipreparative HPLC was employed, eluting with a solution containing 84% MeOH–H2O, which brought about the isolation of compound 5 (400.5 mg, tR = 35.02 min). Fraction C was further fractionated by normal-phase silica gel column chromatography (using 200–300-mesh silica gel), employing a stepwise elution with petroleum ether and ethyl acetate in proportions of 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, and 5:5, with each gradient amounting to 1 L. Similar compounds were combined based on TLC analysis, and nine fractions (C1–C9) were collected. Fraction C6 was purified by reversed-phase semipreparative HPLC using 82% MeOH-H2O as eluent to yield compound 1 (12.2 mg, tR = 26.56 min). In addition, Fraction C7 was purified using 75% MeOH–H2O as the eluent, yielding compound 4 (8.2 mg, tR = 17.32 min). Fraction B was further fractionated by normal-phase silica gel column (using 200–300-mesh silica gel), with petroleum ether and ethyl acetate ratios of 100:0.5, 100:1, 100:2, 100:4, and 100:8, respectively, yielding a total of seven subfractions (B1–B7), which were obtained by combining similar compounds based on TLC analysis. Fraction B7 was further purified through reversed-phase semipreparative HPLC (77% aqueous CH₃CN), leading to the isolation of compounds 2 (5.5 mg, tR = 16.50 min) and 3 (9.6 mg, tR = 30.20 min).
Strekingmycin G, 1: white amorphous powder; [ α ] D 24 25.13 (c 1.26, CH3Cl3); HRESIMS m/z 323.1481 [M + H]+ (calcd for C19H31O4, 323.2217);
Strekingmycin F, 2: white amorphous powder; [ α ] D 24 72.00 (c 0.40, CH3Cl3); HRESIMS m/z 295.2282 [M + H]+ (calcd for C18H31O3, 295.2268);
Strekingmycin H, 3: white amorphous powder; [ α ] D 24 44.44 (c 0.33, CH3Cl3); HRESIMS m/z 351.2199 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C20H32O4Na, 351.2198)’
Phenalinolactone CD8, 4: white amorphous powder; [ α ] D 24 45.27 (c 0.3, CH3OH); HRESIMS m/z 369.2407 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C22H34O3Na, 369.2406).
Strekingmycins G–H (13): for 1H NMR and 13C NMR data (CDCl3), see Table 1 and Table 2; phenalinolactone CD8: for 1H NMR and 13C NMR (CH3OD), see Table 3.

2.6. Effect of Compounds on T. vaporariorum Mortality Rates

According to previously reported methods [21], with some modifications, the efficacy of compounds 15 against T. vaporariorum was tested using the leaf-dip method. The tested compounds were dissolved in acetone and diluted with a 0.5% Tween-80 solution to meet the required concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 mg/L. The trimmed tobacco leaves were immersed in these solutions for 10 s. In contrast, the control leaves were treated with a 0.5% Tween-80 solution, while the positive control leaves were treated with a 2.5 mg/L concentration of acetamiprid.
A total of 30 T. vaporariorum adults were introduced into Petri dishes that contained the aforementioned treated leaves. These dishes were then sealed with a plastic film, ensuring that ventilation was maintained through the presence of small perforations. Each treatment was conducted with three replicates. The mortality of T. vaporariorum was examined at 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment. The corrected mortality rate was calculated using the following formula [22]:
corrected mortality (%) = (P1 − T0)/(100 − P0) × 100
where P1 is the mortality rate in the treatment group; P0 is the mortality rate in the control group.

3. Results

3.1. Structure Elucidation of Compounds

Compound 1 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula is C19H30O4, as determined by positive HRESIMS, indicating five indices of hydrogen deficiency. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 in CDCl3, as detailed in Table 1, exhibited a broad, exchangeable singlet peak at δH 9.25 (1H, br s, COOH). Additionally, a signal characteristic of an olefinic proton was observed at δH 5.55 (1H, r s, H-6). The spectral data additionally revealed a signal attributable to an oxygen-bearing methine proton at δH 3.70 (1H, m, H-14), a clear signal corresponding to a methoxy group at δH 3.27 (3H, s), and a signal indicative of an olefinic methyl group at δH 1.68 (3H, br s, H-19). Additionally, two aliphatic methyl groups were discerned by their signals in the high-field area: one manifesting as a singlet and the other as a triplet. The 13C NMR spectroscopic data, presented in Table 2, encompassed 19 distinct carbon resonances. Among these, a singlet at δC 169.1 was attributed to the carbonyl carbon of a carboxyl group (C-12). The presence of two olefinic carbons was denoted by signals at δC 136.2 (s, C-7) and 128.3 (d, C-6). A ketal carbon was identified by its singlet at δC 104.4 (C-11), while an oxygen-bearing methine carbon was indicated by a doublet at δC 74.0 (C-14). A methoxy carbon was represented by a quartet at δC 51.3. The remaining signals corresponded to 13 aliphatic carbons in the high-field region. The occurrence of a double bond and a carbonyl moiety explain the two indices of hydrogen deficiency, which is suggestive of a tricyclic structural framework in 1. The NMR spectroscopic characteristics previously delineated indicate that 1 is likely a tricyclic polyketide, structurally akin to streptomyces-derived strekingmycin D, and is biosynthesized by the identical strain of Streptomyces [18]. This inference is drawn from the observed NMR data, which align with the known structural features of strekingmycin D, a compound known to be produced by a specific Streptomyces species. The similarity in the NMR profiles further supports the hypothesis of a common biosynthetic pathway and structural homology between the two compounds. An analysis of the NMR spectra of 1 in relation to strekingmycin D demonstrated that the apparent difference only originated from the ring C moiety: the acetyl group of the latter was absent and replaced by a carboxyl group. The heteronuclear multiple-bond correlation (HMBC) spectrum, as depicted in Figure 1, revealed a significant correlation between the methoxy proton signal and the ketal carbon, thereby affirming the existence of the methoxy group at the C-11 position. The two-dimensional NMR analysis provided further validation for the planar structure, with particular emphasis on ring C moiety. Furthermore, the nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) data, illustrated in Figure 2, indicated correlations such as H-5↔H-8/H-10, H-14↔H-8/OCH3, and H3-18↔H-15α. These NOESY correlations were instrumental in establishing the relative stereochemistry of 1, which was found to be in accordance with that of strekingmycin D. The absolute configuration was also deduced to be the same as that of strekingmycin D in view of the same biological source. Thus, the structure of 1 was established as shown in Figure 3 and named strekingmycin G.
Compound 2 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula is C18H30O3, as determined by positive HRESIMS, indicating four indices of hydrogen deficiency. The 1H NMR data for 2 in CDCl3, as listed in Table 1, exhibited the existence of an olefinic proton resonating at δH 5.01 (1H, br s, H-6). Additionally, a signal corresponding to a methoxy group was detected at δH 3.65 (3H, s), as well as an oxygen-bearing methine proton signal at δH 3.52 (1H, m, H-14). Furthermore, it featured a broad singlet attributed to an olefinic methyl group, along with two distinguishable aliphatic methyl signals, with one appearing as a singlet and the other as a triplet. The 13C NMR spectrum extremely resembles that of 1, as detailed in Table 2, just missing the ketal carbon signal. Taking into account the NMR spectroscopic characteristics and the index of hydrogen deficiency, it is plausible to infer that 2 represents a bicyclic polyketide, potentially resulting from the cleavage of ring C in 1. The HMBCs of the methoxy proton and H3-18 [δH 1.26 (3H, s)] to a carbonyl carbon at δC 179.1 (s, C-11), as shown in Figure 1, revealed a methyl carboxylate fragment at C-9. The secondary alcohol, presumed to originate from the ring cleavage process, was anticipated to retain its original absolute configuration without alteration. Consequently, the definitive structure of 2 was delineated as illustrated in Figure 3 and named strekingmycin F.
Compound 3 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula is C20H32O4, as determined by positive HRESIMS. The 1H NMR data for 3 in CDCl3, listed in Table 1, displayed an olefinic proton resonating at δH 5.02 (1H, br s, H-6), an oxygen-bearing methine proton resonating at δH 4.85 (1H, m, H-14), an oxygenated methylene signal at δH 4.28, 4.37 (each 1H, d, J = 18.3 Hz, H-12), an exchangeable broad singlet at δH 3.24 (1H, br s, 12-OH), a signal indicative of an acetoxy group at δH 2.04 (3H, s), an olefinic methyl broad singlet, and two aliphatic methyl signals (one singlet and one triplet). The 13C NMR spectrum, as documented in Table 2, indicated a total of 20 carbon resonances, containing 1 ketone carbonyl carbon, 1 acetoxy carbonyl carbon, 2 olefinic carbons, and 2 oxygenated carbons (1 methine and 1 methylene). Upon conducting a comparative NMR data analysis between 3 and 2, it was found that the methyl carboxylate group present in 2 was notably absent in 3, and an acetoxy group was newly detected. The HMBC indicated a notable correlation between the oxygenated methylene protons and H3-18 to the ketone carbon resonance at δC 215.2 (s, C-11). This observation confirmed the presence of a 2-hydroxyacetyl at the C-9 position, while the hydroxy at C-14 was acetylated, as evidenced by a dramatic downfield shift of H-14. The stereochemistry of 3 was confirmed to be consistent with that of 2 through analysis of the NOESY correlations. Ultimately, as depicted in Figure 3, the definitive structure of 3 was elucidated and consequently designated as strekingmycin H.
Compound 4 was obtained as a white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula is C22H34O3, as identified by positive HRESIMS, indicating six indices of hydrogen deficiency. The 1H NMR data for 4 in CD3OD, as listed in Table 3, revealed a pair of olefinic protons that exhibited mutual coupling, appearing at δH 6.68 (1H, dd, J = 15.6, 10.3 Hz, H-15) and 5.89 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz, H-16), indicative of a trans-configured double bond. Additionally, the spectrum included a signal attributed to an oxygenated methine proton at δH 3.12 (1H, dd, J = 11.6, 4.6 Hz, H-3), an olefinic methyl signal at δH 1.53 (3H, br s, H-21), and four methyl singlets in the high-field region. The 13C NMR spectrum (Table 3) showed a total of twenty-two carbon signals, including one carboxyl carbonyl carbon at δC 171.0 (s, C-17), four olefinic carbons due to two double bonds, and one oxygenated methine carbon at δC 79.6 (d, C-3), as well as three quaternary carbons, three methine carbons, five methylene carbons, and five methyl carbons in the high-field region. The features of the previously mentioned NMR were extremely comparable to those of phenalinolactone CD6, a rare diterpenoid antibiotic produced by a Streptomyces strain [23], and a distinguishing feature was noted in the absence of the carbonyl carbon signal characteristic of a ketone group in the structure of phenalinolactone CD6. The HMBCs (Figure 1) from H-15 at δH 6.68 (1H, dd, J = 15.6, 10.3 Hz) to the carboxyl carbon at δC 171.0 (s, C-17) and C-13 [δC 133.3 (s)] led us to the conclusion that the substituent at C-14 was an (E)-acrylic acid moiety. The resulting planar structure was further confirmed by the 2D NMR analysis. The relative configuration of 4 was determined to be the same as that of phenalinolactone CD6 according to the NOESY correlations (Figure 2) of H-3↔H-5/H3-18, H-14↔H3-22, and H-15↔H3-20. Thus, the structure of 4 was established as shown in Figure 3 and named phenalinolactone CD8. The biosynthetic pathway for the new metabolite may involve extension at C-15 of the diterpene part with acetyl-CoA and then C-15–C-16 dehydrogenation.

3.2. Insecticidal Activity Assay

The insecticidal effects of compounds 15 on T. vaporariorum were assessed using the leaf-dip methods. The findings revealed the insecticidal efficacies of the quintet of compounds when tested on T. vaporariorum at 24, 48, and 72 h were substantially different when measured using the leaf-dip method (Table 4 and Figure S39). Among them, compound 5 exhibited the highest activity against T. vaporariorum, with a corrected mortality rate of 89.74 ± 0.82% after 72 h of treatment, comparable to acetamiprid. The corrected mortality rates of the other four compounds against T. vaporariorum at 72 h ranged from 80.66 ± 2.43% to 56.62 ± 5.3%, which were lower than the positive control.

4. Discussion

Five compounds were separated from the crude extract of Streptomyces sp. SA61. Among them, compounds 1, 2, 3, and 5 are classified as polyketides. Polyketides are constructed through repetitive decarboxylative condensation reactions of basic two-carbon acetate units, similar to the biosynthesis of fatty acids. This includes the use of the same simple precursor pool, such as acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) and malonyl coenzyme A (MCoA) units. [24,25]. Polyketides represent a large class of natural products with various physiological functions and are particularly valuable in pharmacology, such as antibiotics and immunosuppressants [25,26]. In the field of biopesticides, polyketides synthesized by actinomycetes represent a crucial class of biologically active compounds known for their insecticidal properties. These compounds are also prime candidates for applications in agriculture and animal husbandry [27]. As a crucial subset of actinomycetes, the isolation and characterization of Streptomyces are essential steps in the discovery of biologically active secondary metabolites [28]. In our study, the fermented extracts and new isolates of Streptomyces sp. SA61 showed potent activity against T. vaporariorum, indicating that these products can be used as natural pest control agents.
Natural products have garnered widespread attention due to their environmental safety and low toxicity to organisms. Streptomyces is considered a reservoir of various natural products, owing to its powerful and complex metabolic capabilities. Many of its secondary metabolites, which exhibit insecticidal activity, have been widely studied. For example, doramectin congeners produced by Streptomyces avermitilis NEAU1069 have an IC50 value of 10.2 mg/mL against adult two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae Koch) [29]. Similarly, endostemonines A-J, produced by the endophytic Streptomyces sp. BS-1, all exhibited potent lethal activity against Aphis gossypii, with LC50 values ranging from 3.55 to 32.00 mg/L after 72 h [30]. Additionally, tartrolone C, produced by Streptomyces sp. CP1130, exhibited inhibitory effects on both beet armyworm and tobacco budworm, with a MELC10 value of 125 ppm for both insects [31]. Furthermore, the new nemadectin congener Seco-nemadectin, produced by Streptomyces microflavus neau3, exhibited nematicidal activity against Caenorhabditis elegans, with an LC50 value of 15.4 µg/mL after 15 h of treatment [32]. In the current study, a series of compounds, including strekingmycin A, strekingmycins F–H, and phenalinolactone CD8, were successfully extracted from the metabolites produced by the Streptomyces sp. SA61 during its fermentation process. These compounds exhibited significant insecticidal activity against Trialeurodes vaporariorum in the leaf-dip method. The LC50 values for this method ranged from 6.949 to 41.501 mg/L. Given their structural uniqueness and high activity, these compounds have the potential to serve as lead compounds for insecticide development.
Compounds 1, 2, 3, and 5 exhibited high sensitivity against T. vaporariorum. Previous research demonstrated that compound 5 also exhibited significant insecticidal activity against Myzus persicae (Sulzer), with an LC50 value of 7.09 mg/L. This suggests that these compounds contain a wide-ranging spectrum of insecticidal activity. Moreover, these compounds feature an extremely unique skeleton, and no similarly structured insecticides have been reported [33]. Given the unique structural features and notable bioactivity of strekingmycin, these substances are promising candidates as precursors for the development of insecticidal agents. Additionally, it is imperative to conduct further assessments to determine the effectiveness and operational mechanisms of strekingmycin against a variety of pest species.

5. Conclusions

To conclude, the crude extract derived from the fermentation of Streptomyces sp. SA61 demonstrated significant efficacy in targeting T. vaporariorum. Further, compounds 14 were isolated and identified from Streptomyces sp. SA61 for the first time, with 13 considered novel polyketides and 4 identified as a new diterpenoid. Additionally, compounds 2, 3, and 5 showed considerable efficacy against T. vaporariorum. Given the remarkable insecticidal activity often found in microbial secondary metabolites, they have the potential to be considered as precursors for the formulation of insecticidal agents in agriculture.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12102031/s1, Figure S1: Spore morphology of strain SA61 was observed by scanning electron microscopy; Figure S2: Morphological characteristics of strain SA61 on different media; Figure S3: The phylogenetic tree of strain SA61; Figures S4–S38: NMR (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, HSQC, HMBC, 1H-1H COSY, and NOESY) and HRESIMS spectrum of compounds 15; Figure S39: The insecticidal activity of compounds 15 against T. vaporariorum was evaluated using the leaf-dip method.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L. and Y.W.; methodology, F.L.; software, F.L.; validation, F.L. and Y.W.; formal analysis, Y.W. and N.W.; investigation, F.L.; resources, N.W.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L.; writing—review and editing, Z.Y.; supervision, Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China in 2018 [grant number 2018YFD0800401].

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Liaoning Shuangshili Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., for technical assistance with NMR spectra and to Shijiazhuang Bessel Technology Co., Ltd., for their support with MS spectra.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Choi, W.I.; Lee, E.H.; Choi, B.R.; Park, H.M.; Ahn, Y.J. Toxicity of plant essential oils to Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2003, 96, 1479–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mendoza-García, E.E.; Ortega-Arenas, L.D.; Pérez-Pacheco, R.; Rodríguez-Hernández, C. Repellency, toxicity, and oviposition inhibition of vegetable extracts against greenhouse whitefly trialeurodes vaporariorum (westwood) (hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Chil. J. Agric. Res. 2014, 74, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. CABI. Invasive Species Compendium. Trialeurodes vaporariorum. (Whitefly, Greenhouse). 2021. Available online: http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/54660 (accessed on 16 August 2024).
  4. Moodley, V.; Gubba, A.; Mafongoya, P.L. A survey of whitefly-transmitted viruses on tomato crops in South Africa. Crop Prot. 2019, 123, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jones, D.R. Plant viruses transmitted by whiteflies. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 109, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hanssen, I.M.; Lapidot, M. Major tomato viruses in the Mediterranean basin. Adv. Virus Res. 2012, 84, 31–66. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Perring, T.M.; Stansly, P.A.; Liu, T.X.; Smith, H.A.; Andreason, S.A. Whiteflies: Biology, Ecology, and Management. In Sustainable Management of Arthropod Pests of Tomato; Wakil, W., Brust, G.E., Perring, T.M., Eds.; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2018; pp. 73–110. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gorman, K.; Devine, G.; Bennison, J.; Coussons, P.; Punchard, N.; Denholm, I. Report of resistance to the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid in Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest. Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 555–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Millar, N.S.; Denholm, I. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: Targets for commercially important insecticides. Invert. Neurosci. 2007, 7, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Soderlund, D.M.; Bloomquist, J.R. Neurotoxic actions of pyrethroid insecticides. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1989, 34, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bi, J.L.; Toscano, N.C. Current status of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, susceptibility to neonicotinoid and conventional insecticides on strawberries in southern California. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kapantaidaki, D.E.; Sadikoglou, E.; Tsakireli, D.; Kampanis, V.; Stavrakaki, M.; Schorn, C.; Ilias, A.; Riga, M.; Tsiamis, G.; Nauen, R.; et al. Insecticide resistance in Trialeurodes vaporariorum populations and novel diagnostics for kdr mutations. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gorman, K.; Hewitt, F.; Denholm, I.; Devine, G.J. New developments in insecticide resistance in the glasshouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) and the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) in the UK. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2002, 58, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Katz, L.; Baltz, R.H. Natural product discovery: Past, present, and future. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lorsbach, B.A.; Sparks, T.C.; Cicchillo, R.M.; Garizi, N.V.; Hahn, D.R.; Meyer, K.G. Natural products: A strategic lead generation approach in crop protection discovery. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2301–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sparks, T.C.; Sparks, J.M.; Duke, S.O. Natural Product-Based Crop Protection Compounds—Origins and Future Prospects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 2259–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Barka, E.A.; Vatsa, P.; Sanchez, L.; Gaveau-Vaillant, N.; Jacquard, C.; Klenk, H.P.; Clément, C.; Ouhdouch, Y.; van Wezel, G.P. Taxonomy, Physiology, and Natural Products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2015, 80, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, N.; Zhu, K.; Bi, Y.; Liu, F.; Yu, Z. Anti-Aphid Polyketides from Streptomyces sp. SA61. J. Nat. Prod. 2023, 86, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Waksman, S.A. Classification, identification and descriptions of genera and species. In The Actinomycetes; The Williams & Wilkins Co.: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1961; Volume II, pp. 327–334. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shirling, E.T.; Gottlieb, D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces specie. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1966, 16, 313–340. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cao, C.W.; Zhang, J.; Gao, X.W.; Liang, P.; Guo, H.L. Overexpression of carboxylesterase gene associated with organophosphorous insecticide resistance in cotton aphids, Aphis gossypii (Glover). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2008, 90, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1987, 3, 302–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dürr, C.; Schnell, H.J.; Luzhetskyy, A.; Murillo, R.; Weber, M.; Welzel, K.; Vente, A.; Bechthold, A. Biosynthesis of the terpene phenalinolactone in Streptomyces sp. Tü6071: Analysis of the gene cluster and generation of derivatives. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shimizu, Y.; Ogata, H.; Goto, S. Type III Polyketide Synthases: Functional Classification and Phylogenomics. Chembiochem 2017, 18, 1048–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hertweck, C. The biosynthetic logic of polyketide diversity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48, 4688–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chooi, Y.H.; Tang, Y. Navigating the fungal polyketide chemical space: From genes to molecules. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 9933–9953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Toopaang, W.; Bunnak, W.; Srisuksam, C.; Wattananukit, W.; Tanticharoen, M.; Yang, Y.L.; Amnuaykanjanasin, A. Microbial polyketides and their roles in insect virulence: From genomics to biological functions. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2022, 39, 2008–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Montesinos, E. Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection. Int. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.D.; Huang, S.X.; Chen, Y.H.; Liu, C.X.; Xiang, W.S. Four new doramectin congeners with acaricidal and insecticidal activity from Streptomyces avermitilis NEAU1069. Chem. Biodivers. 2011, 8, 2117–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, H.; Yang, A.; Zhang, N.; Li, S.; Yuan, T.; Ding, N.; Zhang, S.; Bao, S.; Wang, C.; Zhnag, Y.; et al. Insecticidal Endostemonines A-J Produced by Endophytic Streptomyces from Stemona sessilifolia. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 1588–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lewer, P.; Chapin, E.L.; Graupner, P.R.; Gilbert, J.R.; Peacock, C. Tartrolone C: A novel insecticidal macrodiolide produced by Streptomyces sp. CP1130. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xiang, W.S.; Wang, J.D.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.J. New nemadectin congener from Streptomyces microflavus neau3: Fermentation, separation, structure elucidation and biological activities. J. Antibiot. 2010, 63, 171–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sparks, T.C.; Nauen, R. IRAC: Mode of action classification and insecticide resistance management. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2015, 121, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 1H-1H COSY and significant HMBCs of compounds 1, 2, and 4. 1H-1H COSY—H-H correlation spectroscopy; HMBC—heteronuclear single-quantum correlation.
Figure 1. 1H-1H COSY and significant HMBCs of compounds 1, 2, and 4. 1H-1H COSY—H-H correlation spectroscopy; HMBC—heteronuclear single-quantum correlation.
Microorganisms 12 02031 g001
Figure 2. Key NOESY correlations of compounds 1 and 4. NOESY—nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy.
Figure 2. Key NOESY correlations of compounds 1 and 4. NOESY—nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy.
Microorganisms 12 02031 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structures of compounds 15.
Figure 3. Chemical structures of compounds 15.
Microorganisms 12 02031 g003
Table 1. 1H NMR spectral data for compounds 13 in CDCl3 a.
Table 1. 1H NMR spectral data for compounds 13 in CDCl3 a.
No.123
10.76 (1Hα, qd-like, 12.6, 3.3)
1.38 (1Hβ, br d, 12.6)
1.14 (1Hα, m)
1.55 (1Hβ, m)
1.14 (1Hα, m)
1.58 (1Hβ, m)
21.25 (1Hβ, m)
1.60 (1Hα, m)
1.14 (1Hβ, m)
1.65 (1Hα, m)
1.15 (1Hβ, m)
1.69 (1Hα, m)
31.20 (1Hα, m)
1.49 (1Hβ, br d, 12.3)
1.21 (1Hα, m)
1.39 (1Hβ, m)
1.17 (1Hα, m)
1.43 (1Hβ, m)
41.62 (1Hβ, m)
1.79 (1Hα, br d, 13.3)
1.49 (1Hβ, m)
1.57 (1Hα, m)
1.47 (1Hβ, m)
1.58 (1Hα, m)
52.27 (1H, br s)2.18 (1H, br s)2.09 (1H, br s)
65.55 (1H, br s)5.01 (1H, br s)5.02 (1H, br s)
82.77 (1H, br d, 13.0)2.63 (1H, br s)2.29 (1H, br s)
102.62 (1H, dt-like, 13.0, 5.1)1.99 (1H, m)1.95 (1H, m)
124.28, 4.37 (each 1H, d, 18.3)
143.70 (1H, m)3.52 (1H, m)4.85 (1H, m)
151.63 (1Hβ, m)
1.73 (1Hα, q-like, 12.8)
1.43, 1.61 (each 1H, m)1.48 (1H, ddd, 15.3, 5.3, 4.0)
1.86 (1H, ddd, 15.3, 9.5, 2.9)
161.60–1.69 (2H, m)1.42, 1.56 (each 1H, m)1.53–1.64 (2H, m)
171.02 (3H, t, 7.4)0.96 (3H, t, 7.4)0.91 (3H, t, 7.4)
180.72 (3H, s)1.26 (3H, s)1.19 (3H, s)
191.68 (3H, br s)1.74 (3H, br s)1.79 (3H, br s)
OCH33.27 (3H, s)3.65 (3H, s)
CH3CO2.04 (3H, s)
a NMR data (δ) were recorded at 600 MHz for 1H and at 150 MHz for 13C in CDCl3. NMR—nuclear magnetic resonance.
Table 2. 13C NMR spectral data for compounds 13 in CDCl3.
Table 2. 13C NMR spectral data for compounds 13 in CDCl3.
No.123
127.9 (t)23.7 (t)23.6 (t)
226.7 (t)26.3 (t)26.4 (t)
322.6 (t)22.7 (t)22.5 (t)
430.3 (t)31.5 (t)31.4 (t)
535.4 (d)35.0 (d)34.5 (d)
6128.3 (d)124.5 (d)125.2 (d)
7136.2 (s)137.5 (s)137.1 (s)
838.3 (d)40.4 (d)38.5 (d)
945.1 (s)50.6 (s)53.8 (s)
1038.5 (d)40.9 (d)41.1 (d)
11104.4 (s)179.1 (s)215.2 (s)
12169.1 (s)64.2 (t)
1474.0 (d)74.9 (d)77.0 (d)
1528.3 (t)38.1 (t)34.9 (t)
1628.6 (t)30.5 (t)27.5 (t)
1710.0 (q)10.2 (q)9.8 (q)
1814.0 (q)20.3 (q)20.4 (q)
1919.0 (q)22.7 (q)22.6 (q)
OCH351.3 (q)51.9 (q)
CH3CO171.0 (s)
CH3CO21.2 (q)
Table 3. 1H and 13C NMR spectral data for compound 4 in CD3OD a.
Table 3. 1H and 13C NMR spectral data for compound 4 in CD3OD a.
No.1H NMR13C NMR
10.95 (1Hβ, m)
1.81 (1Hα, br d, 13.0)
40.3 (t)
21.57, 1.63 (each 1H, m)28.0 (t)
33.12 (1H, dd, 11.6, 4.6)79.6 (d)
439.9 (s)
50.85 (1H, m)57.0 (d)
61.46–1.54 (2H, m)19.0 (t)
71.07 (1Hβ, m)
1.81 (1Hα, br d, 13.0)
39.9 (t)
837.4 (s)
91.05 (1H, m)56.0 (d)
1039.3 (s)
112.09 (1Hα, br d, 19.0)
2.22 (1Hβ, br d, 19.0)
23.5 (t)
125.49 (1H, br s)123.6 (d)
13133.3 (s)
143.05 (1H, br d, 10.3)48.7 (d)
156.68 (1H, dd, 15.6, 10.3)150.8 (d)
165.89 (1H, d, 15.6)127.5 (d)
17171.0 (s)
180.96 (3H, s)28.8 (q)
190.78 (3H, s)16.3 (q)
200.89 (3H, s)27.8 (q)
211.53 (3H, br s)23.2 (q)
220.93 (3H, s)15.1 (q)
a Overlapped in the solvent signal. NMR data (δ) were recorded at 600 MHz for 1H and at 150 MHz for 13C in CD3OD.
Table 4. The potency of compounds 15 on T. vaporariorum at 72 h a.
Table 4. The potency of compounds 15 on T. vaporariorum at 72 h a.
CompoundToxicity Regression Equation (y)LC50 (95% CL) (mg/L)χ2p Value
Strekingmycin G, 1Y = −1.915 + 1.410x22.817 (19.090–27.144)9.9900.695
Strekingmycin H, 2Y = −1.982 + 1.546x19.150 (16.132–22.459)17.9270.160
Strekingmycin F, 3Y = −2.248 + 1.827x16.981 (14.587–19.521)16.2350.237
Phenalinolactone CD8, 4Y = −2.089 + 1.291x41.501 (34.149–52.257)7.9760.845
Strekingmycin A, 5Y = −1.521 + 1.805x6.949 (5.415–8.456)10.1160.684
a LC50, 50% lethal concentration; CL, confidence limit; χ2, chi-squared value. Data are the average of three replicates and have been adjusted for control mortality using the Abbott formula [22].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, F.; Wang, N.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Z. The Insecticidal Activity of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Streptomyces sp. SA61 against Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102031

AMA Style

Liu F, Wang N, Wang Y, Yu Z. The Insecticidal Activity of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Streptomyces sp. SA61 against Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Microorganisms. 2024; 12(10):2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Fei, Ning Wang, Yinan Wang, and Zhiguo Yu. 2024. "The Insecticidal Activity of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Streptomyces sp. SA61 against Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)" Microorganisms 12, no. 10: 2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop