Next Article in Journal
Microorganism Strains, Environmentally Friendly and Biological Preparations Against Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood, 1949 and Their Impact on Fruit Quality and Tomato Crop Structure
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Chemical Flocculants and Chitosan as a Pre-Concentration Step in the Harvesting Process of Three Native Microalgae Species from the Canary Islands Cultivated Outdoors at the Pilot Scale
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Overview of Lsr2 Repressor Effect in Streptomyces spp. Secondary Metabolism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from Harposporium anguillulae Against Meloidogyne incognita

1
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China
2
Institute of Tropical Eco-Agricultural Sciences of Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650091, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(12), 2585; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122585
Submission received: 11 November 2024 / Revised: 5 December 2024 / Accepted: 12 December 2024 / Published: 13 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Secondary Metabolism of Microorganisms, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

:
Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) are pathogens that endanger a wide range of crops and cause serious global agricultural losses. In this study, we investigated metabolites of the endoparasitic fungus Harposporium anguillulae YMF1.01751, with the expectation of discovering valuable Meloidogyne incognita biocontrol compounds. Based on results obtained by a liquid chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer (LC-MS) of crude extracts under five culture conditions and their nematicidal activity against M. incognita, corn meal agar (CMA) medium was determined as the scale-up fermentation medium. Twelve metabolites (112) were isolated from the fermentation products, and compound 1 was identified to be a new cyclic tetrapeptide. The activity assay results showed that phenylacetic acid (11) had good nematicidal activity at 400 μg/mL, and the mortalities of M. incognita were 89.76% and 96.05% at 12 and 24 h, respectively, while the mortality of canthin-6-one (2) against M. incognita was 44.26% at 72 h. In addition, the results of chemotaxis activity showed that 1-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethanone (10) possessed attraction activity towards M. incognita. At the tested concentrations, cyclo-(Arg-Pro) (4) and cyclo-(Val-Ile) (7) showed an avoidant response to M. incognita. This study provides insight into the nematode-active compounds of H. anguillulae origin and offers new opportunities for the development of RKN biocontrol products.

1. Introduction

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) are an important pathogen group that parasitizes and proliferates on a wide range of crops, causing significant damage to agricultural production [1,2]. The control of RKNs remains a worldwide challenge, and various methods, including agricultural, physical, chemical, and biological controls, have been applied to prevent RKNs infestations [3,4]. Among them, biological control is an effective method due to its long-term, stable, relatively safe, and environmentally friendly characteristics [5,6].
Endoparasitic fungi produce spores, some of which are swallowed by nematodes and cause them death through spore germination [7,8]. Harposporium anguillulae is a typical species of endoparasitic fungi [9]. During infection, the spores of H. anguillulae are swallowed by the nematode and then attach to its mouth, intestine, or throat. When the spores germinate into hyphae, they penetrate the nematode’s body wall and consume it for nutrients, ultimately killing them [10]. Recently, some reports indicated that metabolites play an important role in fungal infections of nematodes [11,12]. Our previous work reported that a new furan harposporin A and a known aureonitol were identified from Harposporium sp. YMF1.01735 [13]. H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 yielded seven metabolites, one of which was a newly identified polyketone, with some showing weak nematicidal activity or chemotactic effects toward nematodes [14], indicating that metabolites of the strain may play a role in parasitizing nematodes. In order to obtain more active metabolites, we further investigated the metabolites of H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 through screening culture conditions to establish a chemical framework for understanding the biological mechanisms of H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 against M. incognita.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. H. anguillulae Strain and Culture

H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 was isolated from soil and deposited in the Microbial Library’s Germplasm Bank of Wild Species from Southwest China, Yunnan University, Kunming, China. The strain was incubated on PDA medium plates at 28 °C for 5 d in the dark (The medium was made from 200 g of potato, 20 g of glucose, 20 g of agar, and 1 L of water. The peeled potatoes were weighed and boiled for 30 min, and the potato juice was filtered through gauze until a volume of 1 L was obtained. Then, 20 g of glucose and 20 g of agar were added to the potato juice). Then, the colonies were cut into small pieces with a sterile scalpel and transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask filled with PDB (PDA media without agar). The conidia were fully shaken in a shaker for 40 min and then filtered to obtain the conidial liquid for follow-up experiments.

2.2. Screening of Culture Conditions

Five solid types of media (PDA, PDYA, WB, OAT, and CMA) were prepared in 500 mL volumes as follows: PDA; PDYA (200 g of potato, 10 g of glucose, 5 g of tryptone, 4 g of yeast extract, 1 g of (NH4)2SO4, 2 g of KH2PO4, 1.5 g of MgSO4, 0.1 g of CaCl2, 0.01 g of FeSO4, 20 g of agar, and 1 L of water); WB (50 g of wheat bran, 10 g of glucose, 5 g of tryptone, 4 g of yeast extract, 1 g of (NH4)2SO4, 2 g of KH2PO4, 1.5 g of MgSO4, 0.1 g of CaCl2, 0.01 g of FeSO4, 20 g of agar, and 1 L of water); OAT (50 g of oat, 10 g of glucose, 5 g of tryptone, 4 g of yeast extract, 1 g of (NH4)2SO4, 2 g of KH2PO4, 1.5 g of MgSO4, 0.1 g of CaCl2, 0.01 g of FeSO4, 20 g of agar, and 1 L of water); CMA (50 g of maize, 10 g of glucose, 5 g of tryptone, 4 g of yeast extract, 1 g of (NH4)2SO4, 2 g of KH2PO4, 1.5 g of MgSO4, 0.1 g of CaCl2, 0.01 g of FeSO4, 20 g of agar, and 1 L of water). These media were sterilized at 121 °C for 30 min and then placed onto 25 plates (90 mm). The conidial suspension (500 μL) of H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 was inoculated on each plate and incubated at 28 °C for 21 days in the dark. The solid culture system, including the media and mycelia, was extracted exhaustively three times using ethyl acetate/methanol/acetic acid (80:15:5, v/v/v), and these extracts were named PDA21, PDYA21, WB21, OAT21, and CMA21. All extracts were detected using LC-MS.

2.3. LC-MS Detection and Metabolomic Data Analysis

LC-MS data were obtained using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 LC system coupled with a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (San Jose, CA, USA) (Thermo, Bremen, Germany). All samples were separated on an XTerra® MS C18 (150 mm × 3.9 mm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a particle size of 5 µm at an LC flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, a flow split ratio of 0.3 directed to the ionization source, and a column temperature of 40 °C. Mobile phase A was 0.1% formic acid in water, and mobile phase B was 0.1% formic acid in methanol. The 35 min gradient using for the positive ESI mode was set as follows: 0–5 min, 10% solvent B; 5–23 min, 10–99% solvent B; 23–28 min, 99% solvent B; and 28–35 min, 10% solvent B. The injection volume was 5 μL, and each sample was injected in triplicate. Untargeted metabolomics data were analyzed using Compound Discoverer 3.3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following our previous method [15].

2.4. Instruments, Extraction, and Isolation

The general experimental instruments, metabolite extraction and isolation, and known compounds’ spectral data are described in the Materials and Methods Section of the Supplementary Materials.

2.5. The Nematicidal Activity of Fermentation Products and Compounds

The M. incognita used in this study was provided by Dr. Lu CJ [16] and was identified previously as references [17]. The direct contact method [18] was used to assay the nematicidal activity of H. anguillulae fermentation extracts against M. incognita. First, sterile water containing 1% methanol was used to fully dissolve each of the five extracts (400 μg/mL). Secondly, a water solution containing 200–300 M. incognita J2s was added to the 24-hole biochemical test plate (NEST, Wuxi NEST Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Wuxi, China) in the middle of each hole. The solution with 1% methanol and without compounds was used for the blank control group, and each experimental group was designed with 3 parallel assays. Finally, the test plates were incubated at 25 °C. The number of living and deceased nematodes was counted every 12 h, and the death rate of the nematode was calculated.
All isolated compounds were dissolved in methanol. About two hundred M. incognita J2s were added to each test and the final concentration of the tested compounds was set at 400 μg/mL. The ddH2O, with an equal amount of methanol, was used for the blank control, and avermectin (Macklin, Shanghai, China) was used for the positive control. Nematode mortality was calculated by tracking the total and deceased nematode numbers every 24 h [19]. A stereomicroscope was used to count the number of nematodes at 25 °C. Juveniles were judged deceased if their body was straight without movement despite physical stimulation with a fine needle. The number of survivors and deaths among the root-knot nematodes was counted, and the mortality rate was calculated according to the following formula: Nematode mortality rate (%) = number of dead nematodes/total number of experimental nematodes × 100.

2.6. Chemotaxis Assay Against M. incognita

The WA medium (20 g agar, 1 L water) was poured evenly, at a thickness of approximately 1 cm, into a 90 mm Petri dish. After the medium solidified, the central area at the rear of the Petri dish was chosen as the focal point of the circle. Two diameters were drawn around the center, one of which was used as the reference line for adding test samples. A dotted line perpendicular to the reference line was drawn on the left and right sides, 5 mm from the circle’s center, to serve as the sampling area for the test nematode. Then, the sampling reference lines on the left and right sides, 25 mm away from the center of the circle, were marked as S (the experimental group) and C (the blank group), and the sampling area for M. incognita J2s was used.
All compounds (112) isolated from H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 were dissolved with methanol, and the prepared methanol solution containing the compounds (40, 20, 10, and 5 μg) was added to the area marked S; methanol (with the same volume and no compounds) was added to the area marked C as a blank control. After the solvent dried, an equal volume of aqueous solution containing 200~300 M. incognita J2s was added to the circle’s center and cultured at 25 °C. The root-knot nematodes in regions S and C were counted at three time points of 1, 2, and 3 h, and the chemotactic index was calculated according to the following formula [20]: Chemotactic index (CI) = (S − C)/(S + C). CI ≥ 0.2 indicates strong attraction; CI ≥ 0.1 indicates weak attraction; CI ≤ −0.1 indicates weak repulsion; CI ≤ −0.2 indicates strong repulsion; and −0.1 < CI < 0.1 indicates random movement.

3. Results

3.1. Activity Assay and LC-MS Detection of Fermentation Products Under Different Screening Conditions

The nematicidal activity of the extracts from five media types against M. incognita was measured. The results showed that at a concentration of 400 μg/mL, the nematicidal activity of the PDYA, CMA, and OAT extracts was significantly enhanced at 24, 36, and 48 h and tended to be stable at 48 h, with mortalities of 76.2%, 47.0%, and 12.5%, respectively. Two way-ANOVA was used for statistical analysis with the software GraphPad Prism 9.5.1 (Figure S1), and the results indicated significant differences of nematicidal activity between three media extracts and control. The WB and PDA extracts had no obvious nematode-killing activity at 400 μg/mL.
To determine whether there were differences in metabolites in the different culture media, the five samples were subjected to untargeted metabolomics LC-MS. Relative quantitative analyses of metabolites may indicate metabolite differences in H. anguillulae in different culture media. The metabolomics data for the principal component analysis (PCA) were derived from all metabolites annotated by Compound Discoverer 3.3 after the LC-MS analysis. The results of the PCA showed that the extracts of the three replicates had good aggregation under the same culture conditions. The metabolites of H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 varied under different culture conditions (Figure 1A), as analyzed using LC-MS chromatograms. We found that the extracts from CMA had significantly more peaks at 8–13 min and 16–25 min than the other extracts in the total ion chromatogram (Figure 1B). Based on the LC-MS detection and nematicidal activity results, CMA was ultimately selected to ferment the strain H. anguillulae YMF1.01751.

3.2. Structural Identification of the Compounds

A total of 12 metabolites were isolated and identified from the extracts of H. anguillulae YMF 1.01751 on the CMA medium.
Compound 1: White solid; C18H32N4O4; ESI-MS m/z: 369 [M + H]+; [ α ] D 25 = −69.2 (c 0.10, MeOH); for 1H-NMR (CD3OD, 600 MHz) and 13C-NMR (CD3OD, 150 MHz) data, see Table 1. HR-ESI-MS: 369.2483 ([M + H]+, calc. for C18H32O4N4, 369.2496). The results of the positive HR-ESI-MS analysis indicated a molecular formula of C18H32N4O4 based on the [M + H]+ ion peak at m/z 369.2483 (calc. 369.2496). The 13C-NMR and DEPT data (Table 1) revealed four quaternary carbons (δC 171.5, 171.1, 169.2, and 171.0), six methines including four nitrogen-substituted methines (δC 51.7, 51.9, 60.9, and 54.6), two methylene groups, and six methyl groups. According to the reference data, compound 1 may be a cyclic tetrapeptide [21,22].
The connections of the amino acid residues in the structure of 1 were established using key correlations from the 2D-NMR data (Table 1): Val-1-H-3 (δH 1.43) has an HMBC remote correlation with Val-1-C-1 (δC 171.5) and Val-1-C-2 (δC 51.7), and Val-1-H-2 (δH 4.03) and Val-1-H-3 (δH 1.43) showed COSY correlations, establishing one valine residue (Val-1). Val-2-H-3 (δH 1.44) was correlated with Val-2-C-2 (δC 51.9) and Val-2-C-1 (δC 171.1) in HMBC, while Val-2-H-2 (δH 4.00) and Val-2-H-3 (δH 1.44) showed correlations in the 1H-1H COSY spectrum, confirming the presence of other valine residues (Val-2). The isoleucine residue (Ile) was established by the correlations between Ile-H-5 (δH 0.94) and Ile-C-3 (δC 40.3) and Ile-C-4 (δC 25.3), as well as between Ile-H-6 (δH 1.02) and Ile-C-4 (δC 25.3), Ile-C-3 (δC 40.3), and Ile-C- 2 (δC 60.9). Additionally, correlations between Ile-H-2 (δH 3.90) and Ile-C-1 (δC 169.2), Ile-C-3 (δC 40.3), and Ile-C-4 (δC 25.3) were noted, along with correlations among Ile-H-2/Ile-H-3/(Ile-H-6/)Ile-H-4/Ile-H-5 in the 1H-1H COSY spectrum. Combining the correlations among Leu-H-2/Leu-H-3/Leu-H-4/Leu-H-6/Leu-H-5 in the 1H-1H COSY spectrum, the leucine residue (Leu) was determined through the HMBC correlations between Leu-H-5 (δH 0.95) and Leu-H-6 (δH 0.96), and Leu-C-4 (δC 25.6) and Leu-C-3 (δC 45.1). Additionally, correlations between Leu-H-3 (δH 1.72) and Leu-C-1 (δC 171.0), Leu-C-2 (δC 54.6), and Leu-C-4 (δC 25.6) were observed. Additionally, Ile-H-2 (δH 3.90) was correlated with Val-2-C-1 (δC 171.1), and Leu-H-2 (δH 3.93) was correlated with Ile-C-1 (δC 169.2) in the HMBC spectrum (Figure 2). Compound 1 was identified as cyclo-(Val-Val-Ile-Leu) (Figure 2).
Other known compounds were identified as canthin-6-one (2) [23], cyclo-(His-Pro) (3) [24], cyclo-(Arg-Pro) (4) [25], cyclo-(Pro-Val) (5) [26], 3-isobutyl-3,4-dihydro-1H-benzo[e][1,4]diazepine-2,5-dion (6) [27], cyclo-(Val-Ile) (7) [28], cyclo-(Pro-Phe) (8) [29], lumichrome (9) [30], 1-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethanone (10) [31], phenylacetic acid (11) [32], and cerebroside C (12) [33] based on the literature data. Their chemical structures are shown in Figure 3.

3.3. Nematicidal Activity of the Isolated Compounds Against M. incognita

The results showed that with increasing time up to 72 h, compounds 2, 8, 11, and 12 exhibited enhanced nematicidal activity against M. incognita J2s at a concentration of 400 μg/mL. Compound 11 was the most active, and the nematode death rate reached 89.76% at 12 h and 96.05% at 24 h. The fatality rate of compound 2 was 44.26%, and that of compound 8 was 31.49% at 72 h at 400 μg/mL. In the further analysis, the nematicidal activity of compounds 2, 8, 11, and 12 was shown to be significantly different to that of the blank control during all observation periods (Figure 4) by two way-ANOVA statistical analyses with GraphPad Prism 9.5.1. Furthermore, with avermectin, the nematode death rate reached 100% at 12 h at 100 μg/mL.

3.4. Chemotactic Activity of Compounds Towards M. incognita

As described in the Materials and Methods Section, the sample and control were located in the S (experimental group) and C (blank group) areas, and root-knot nematode sampling areas were used in the center of the circle (Figure 5A). The chemotactic assay demonstrated that compound 10 exhibited chemotactic activity against the nematodes at 40 μg, with chemotactic indices of 0.234, 0.217, and 0.235 at 1, 2, and 3 h, respectively. Compounds 1, 8, and 12 showed weak attractive activity towards the nematodes, with the chemotactic index ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 at 1, 2, and 3 h (Figure 5B). In addition, M. incognita showed strong avoidance towards compound 4 at 40 μg, and the chemotactic indices were −0.298, −0.207, and −0.230, at 1, 2, and 3 h, respectively. Compounds 2 and 7 had a weak repulsion effect on root-knot nematodes, and the chemotactic index was between −0.1 and −0.2 (Figure 5B). Although some compounds exhibited certain chemotactic activity at the test concentrations in the observation periods, the results of further statistical analysis showed that only compounds 4 and 10 had significant differences at 1 and 3 h compared with the control (Figure 5B). A further chemotaxis experiment with compound 4 indicated that reducing compound 4 from 40 μg to 5 μg shifted its repulsion of root-knot nematodes, which gradually weakened.

4. Discussion

So far, there have only been two reports on the metabolites of the genus Harposporium [13,14]. In this study, specialized metabolites of H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 were discovered through culture condition screening, isolating twelve compounds from the cultures of H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 on CMA medium. All compounds were firstly obtained from the genus Harposporium. Their structure types were mainly aromatic compounds and cyclic peptides, and compound 1 was a new cyclic tetrapeptide. The nematicidal activity assay results showed that phenylacetic acid (11), cyclo-(Pro-Phe) (8), and canthin-6-one (2) possessed nematicidal activity against M. incognita J2s. Phenacetic acid (11) is a common and simple aromatic organic acid that can be produced by many microorganisms and has been reported to have nematicidal activity [34]. Compound 2 was mainly obtained from plants with antibacterial, antifungal, cytotoxic activities, and anti-inflammatory effects [35]. In addition, the chemotactic activity experiments showed that three compounds had attraction activity, while the other three had avoidance activity against M. incognita J2s. Then, two compounds, canthin-6-one (2) and (cyclo-(Pro-Phe) (8), showed nematicidal and chemotactic activity towards nematodes. These activities of the two compounds are reported for the first time. Therefore, exploring metabolites with various activities presents a promising research direction for developing targeted preparations for controlling root-knot nematodes. In addition, lumichrome (9) as a derivative of riboflavin, can stimulate the LasR bacterial QS receptor as a QS signal-mimic compound [36], and enhances root respiration in alfalfa and shoot growth [37]. Cerebroside C (12) was obtained from various fungi and plants as a potent elicitor and natural plant-growth regulator [38]. These results indicate that H. anguillulae can produce metabolites with diverse biological activities.
H. anguillulae is an important group of parasitic fungi and a major natural enemy of nematodes, primarily infecting bacterial nematodes (such as Caenorhabditis elegans) through endoparasitism. When H. anguillulae infects root-knot nematodes, which possess a narrow mouth needle, the nematode cannot swallow the spores. Instead, the fungus adheres to the nematode’s body surface through the spores, forming hyphae as the spores germinate. This process is accompanied by the secretion of extracellular enzymes and metabolites, which work with the hyphae to dissolve the nematode’s body wall and then infect it, resulting in its death [39]. The secondary metabolites of H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 under different culture conditions have different degrees of toxicity on root-knot nematodes, which suggests that the synthesis of the H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 metabolites is regulated by the environment, and that the production of these compounds has important physiological functions. An increasing number of studies indicate that metabolites are involved in the fungal infection of nematodes. Oligosporons and arthrosporols were identified from the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora; among them, oligosporon has toxic activity against intestinal parasitic nematodes [40], and arthrosporols participate in regulating the differentiation and formation of traps [41]. Interestingly, many fungi secrete metabolites to attract nematodes. A. oligospora produces the volatile compound methyl 3-methyl-2-butenoate, which strongly attracts nematodes [11], and 6-methylsalicylic acid, produced by A. flagrans, attracts nematodes and plays a spatiotemporal regulatory role in the formation of traps [12]. Subsequently, secondary metabolites may play an important role in the functions of fungal parasitic nematodes.

5. Conclusions

H. anguillulae YMF1.01751, a nematode endoparasitic fungus, has potential for the biological control of nematodes. In this study, its secondary metabolites were screened on different culture media, including CMA medium, leading to the isolation of 12 compounds and a new tetrapeptide. The biological activity screening results indicate that the strain can produce nematicidal and chemotactic active metabolites, which may play a role at different stages of fungal parasitism.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12122585/s1, Supplementary File: Materials and Methods. Figure S1. The nematicidal activity of the extracts from three media against M. incognita. In the same time period of data, two way-ANOVA statistical analysis indicates significant differences (*** p < 0.003; **** p < 0.001) compared with the control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L. and P.-J.Z.; methodology, D.L., L.-F.B., H.-M.L. and P.-J.Z.; software, G.-K.Z. and D.L.; data curation, D.L., G.-H.L. and P.-J.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, D.L., L.-F.B., H.-M.L. and P.-J.Z.; writing—review and editing, G.-H.L. and P.-J.Z.; funding acquisition, G.-H.L. and P.-J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFD1400700), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32270132 and 31970060), Science and Technology Major Project from Yunnan Province (202201BC070004), and Science and Technology Innovation Base Construction Project (202307AB110011).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Microbial Library of the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species from Southwest China for preserving and providing experimental strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tapia-Vázquez, I.; Montoya-Martínez, A.C.; De Los Santos-Villalobos, S. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) a threat to agriculture in Mexico: Biology, current control strategies, and perspectives. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khan, A.; Chen, S.; Fatima, S.; Ahamad, L.; Siddiqui, M.A. Biotechnological tools to elucidate the mechanism of plant and nematode interactions. Plants 2023, 12, 2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Seo, H.J.; Park, A.R.; Kim, S. Biological control of root-knot nematodes by organic acid-producing Lactobacillus brevis WiKim0069 isolated from Kimchi. Plant Pathol. J. 2019, 35, 662–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rutter, W.B.; Franco, J.; Gleason, C. Rooting out the mechanisms of root-knot nematode-plant interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2022, 60, 43–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Forghani, F.; Hajihassani, A. Recent advances in the development of environmentally benign treatments to control root-knot nematodes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Veronico, P.; Melillo, M.T. Marine organisms for the sustainable management of plant parasitic nematodes. Plants 2021, 10, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liang, L.M.; Zou, C.G.; Xu, J.; Zhang, K.Q. Signal pathways involved in microbe-nematode interactions provide new insights into the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 374, 20180317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soares, F.E.F.; Ferreira, J.; Genier, H.L.; Al-Ani, L.; Aguilar-Marcelino, L. Biological control 2.0: Use of nematophagous fungi enzymes for nematode control. J. Nat. Pestic. Res. 2023, 4, 100025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, X.; Luo, H.; Zhang, K. A new species of Harposporium parasitic on nematodes. Can. J. Bot. 2005, 83, 558–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Flores Francisco, B.G.; Ponce, I.M.; Plascencia Espinosa, M.; Moctezuma, A.M.; López, V.E.L.y. Advances in the biological control of phytoparasitic nematodes via the use of nematophagous fungi. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hsueh, Y.P.; Gronquist, M.R.; Schwarz, E.M.; Nath, R.D.; Lee, C.H.; Gharib, S.; Schroeder, F.C.; Sternberg, P.W. Nematophagous fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora mimics olfactory cues of sex and food to lure its nematode prey. Elife 2017, 6, e20023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yu, X.; Hu, X.; Pop, M.; Wernet, N.; Kirschhöfer, F.; Brenner-Weiß, G.; Keller, J.; Bunzel, M.; Fischer, R. Fatal attraction of Caenorhabditis elegans to predatory fungi through 6-methyl-salicylic acid. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zheng, Q.M.; Souvanhnachit, S.; Wang, X.; Li, G.H. A new furan derivative from Harposporium sp. YMF1.01735. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2020, 56, 845–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dai, Z.B.; Gan, Y.; Zhao, P.J.; Li, G.H. Secondary metabolites from the endoparasitic nematophagous fungus Harposporium anguillulae YMF1.01751. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lei, H.M.; Wang, J.T.; Hu, Q.Y.; Li, C.Q.; Mo, M.H.; Zhang, K.Q.; Li, G.H.; Zhao, P.J. 2-Furoic acid associated with the infection of nematodes by Dactylellina haptotyla and its biocontrol potential on plant root-knot nematodes. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0189623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, C.J.; Meng, Y.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, T.; Yang, G.F.; Mo, M.H.; Ji, K.F.; Liang, L.M.; Zou, C.G.; Zhang, K.Q. Survival and infectivity of second-stage root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita juveniles depend on lysosome-mediated lipolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 101637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Koulagi, R.; Banerjee, S.; Gawade, B.H.; Singh, A.K.; Jain, P.K.; Praveen, S.; Subramaniam, K.; Sirohi, A. Host-delivered RNA interference in tomato for mediating resistance against Meloidogyne incognita and Tomato leaf curl virus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 143, 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, W.P.; Ruan, W.B.; Deng, Y.Y.; Gao, Y.B. Potential antagonistic effects of nine natural fatty acids against Meloidogyne incognita. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11631–11637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bao, Z.X.; Liu, R.; Li, C.Q.; Pan, X.R.; Zhao, P.J. Pathogenicity and metabolites of Purpureocillium lavendulum YMF1.00683 against Meloidogyne incognita. Pathogens 2022, 11, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.G.; Kim, M. Indole-associated predator-prey interactions between the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 1776–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pathak, R.D. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of halolitoralin B—A natural cyclic peptide. Asian J. Chem. 2007, 19, 1499–1505. [Google Scholar]
  22. Poojary, B.; Belagali, S.L. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of cyclic peptides: Viscumamide, Yunnanin A and Evolidine. Z. Naturforschung B 2005, 60, 1313–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Czerwinski, K.M.; Zificsak, C.A.; Stevens, J.; Oberbeck, M.; Randlett, C.; King, M.; Mennen, S. An improved synthesis of canthin-6-one. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 1225–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Izumida, H.; Imamura, N.; Sano, H. A novel chitinase inhibitor from a marine bacterium, Pseudomonas sp. J. Antibiot. 1996, 49, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vergne, C.; Boury-Esnault, N.; Perez, T. Verpacamides A-D, a sequence of C11N5 diketopiperazines relating cyclo(Pro-Pro) to cyclo(Pro-Arg), from the marine sponge Axinella vaceleti: Possible biogenetic precursors of pyrrole-2-aminoimidazole alkaloids. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2421–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mehnaz, S.; Saleem, R.S.; Yameen, B. Lahorenoic acids A-C, ortho-dialkyl-substituted aromatic acids from the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas aurantiaca PB-St2. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anil, S.M.; Shobith, R.; Kiran, K.R.; Swaroop, T.R.; Mallesha, N.; Sadashiva, M.P. Facile synthesis of 1,4-benzodiazepine-2,5-diones and quinazolinones from amino acids as anti-tubercular agents. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, S.; Tan, N.; Yang, Y.; He, M. Cyclodipeptides from the roots of Panax notoginseng. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2004, 16, 383–386. [Google Scholar]
  29. Campbell, J.; Lin, Q.; Geske, G.D.; Blackwell, H.E. New and unexpected insights into the modulation of LuxR-type quorum sensing by cyclic dipeptides. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009, 4, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, Z.G.; Zhao, J.Y.; Yang, P.W.; Li, M.G.; Huang, R.; Cui, X.L.; Wen, M.L. 1H and 13C NMR assignments of eight nitrogen containing compounds from Nocardia alba sp.nov (YIM 30243T). Magn. Reson. Chem. 2009, 47, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kamble, N.R.; Pawar, H.R.; Kamble, V.T. NbCl5 and AgClO4 promoted regio-selective acylation of indoles. Asian J. Chem. 2020, 32, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hwang, B.K.; Lim, S.W.; Kim, B.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Moon, S.S. Isolation and in vivo and in vitro antifungal activity of phenylacetic acid and sodium phenylacetate from Streptomyces humidus. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2001, 67, 3739–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Koga, J.; Yamauchi, T.; Shimura, M.; Ogawa, N.; Oshima, K.; Umemura, K.; Kikuchi, M.; Ogasawara, N. Cerebrosides A and C, sphingolipid elicitors of hypersensitive cell death and phytoalexin accumulation in rice plants. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 31985–31991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Siddiqui, I.A.; Shaukat, S.S. Phenylacetic acid-producing Rhizoctonia solani represses the biosynthesis of nematicidal compounds in vitro and influences biocontrol of Meloidogyne incognita in tomato by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 and its GM derivatives. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 98, 43–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cho, S.-K.; Jeong, M.; Jang, D.S.; Choi, J.-H. Anti-inflammatory effects of canthin-6-one alkaloids from Ailanthus altissima. Planta Med. 2018, 84, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rajamani, S.; Bauer, W.D.; Robinson, J.B.; Farrow, J.M.; Pesci, E.C.; Teplitski, M.; Gao, M.; Sayre, R.T.; Phillips, D.A. The vitamin riboflavin and its derivative lumichrome activate the LasR bacterial quorum-sensing receptor. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 21, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Phillips, D.A.; Joseph, C.M.; Yang, G.P.; Martinez-Romero, E.; Sanborn, J.R.; Volpin, H. Identification of lumichrome as a sinorhizobium enhancer of alfalfa root respiration and shoot growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 12275–12280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, H.X.; Xiao, Y.; Cao, L.L.; Yan, X.; Li, C.; Shi, H.Y.; Wang, J.W.; Ye, Y.H. Cerebroside C Increases Tolerance to Chilling Injury and Alters Lipid Composition in Wheat Roots. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e73380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aschner, M.; Kohn, S. The biology of Harposporium anguillulae. Microbiology 1958, 19, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Anderson, M.G.; Jarman, T.B.; Rickards, R.W. Structures and absolute configurations of antibiotics of the oligosporon group from the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora. J. Antibiot. 1995, 48, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, Z.F.; Chen, Y.H.; Song, T.Y.; Zeng, Z.J.; Yan, N.; Zhang, K.Q.; Niu, X.M. Nematicidal key precursors for the biosynthesis of morphological regulatory arthrosporols in the nematode-trapping fungus Arthrobotrys oligospora. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 7949–7956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The LC-MS detection of extracts produced by H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 in five media. (A) Principal component analysis of the metabolites from H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 in different media. (B) LC-MS profiles of metabolites extracted from H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 in total ion chromatography.
Figure 1. The LC-MS detection of extracts produced by H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 in five media. (A) Principal component analysis of the metabolites from H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 in different media. (B) LC-MS profiles of metabolites extracted from H. anguillulae YMF1.01751 in total ion chromatography.
Microorganisms 12 02585 g001
Figure 2. The COSY and key HMBC correlations of 1.
Figure 2. The COSY and key HMBC correlations of 1.
Microorganisms 12 02585 g002
Figure 3. The metabolites isolated from H. anguillulae YMF1.01751.
Figure 3. The metabolites isolated from H. anguillulae YMF1.01751.
Microorganisms 12 02585 g003
Figure 4. The nematicidal activity of compounds against M. incognita. In the same time period of data, two way-ANOVA statistical analysis indicates significant differences (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.003; **** p < 0.001) compared with the control.
Figure 4. The nematicidal activity of compounds against M. incognita. In the same time period of data, two way-ANOVA statistical analysis indicates significant differences (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005; *** p < 0.003; **** p < 0.001) compared with the control.
Microorganisms 12 02585 g004
Figure 5. The chemotactic activity of compounds towards M. incognita. (A) Schematic diagram of chemotactic activity. (B) The chemotactic activity of compounds. In the same time period of data, two way-ANOVA statistical analysis indicates significant differences (* p < 0.05) compared with the control.
Figure 5. The chemotactic activity of compounds towards M. incognita. (A) Schematic diagram of chemotactic activity. (B) The chemotactic activity of compounds. In the same time period of data, two way-ANOVA statistical analysis indicates significant differences (* p < 0.05) compared with the control.
Microorganisms 12 02585 g005
Table 1. The NMR data of compound 1 in CD3OD.
Table 1. The NMR data of compound 1 in CD3OD.
Position1H13CHMBC
Val-1-1-171.5, s-
Val-1-24.03 (1H, q, J = 7.1 Hz)51.7, d20.88
Val-1-31.43 (3H, d, J = 7.1 Hz)20.88, q51.7, 171.5
Val-2-1-171.1, s-
Val-2-24.00 (1H, q, J = 7.1 Hz)51.9, d20.92
Val-2-31.44 (3H, d, J = 7.1 Hz)20.92, q51.9, 171.1
Ile-1-169.2, s-
Ile-23.90 (1H, d, J = 3.0 Hz)60.9, d15.6, 25.3, 40.3, 169.2, 171.1
Ile-31.95 (1H, m)40.3, d25.3, 60.9
Ile-41.24 (1H, m)25.3, t12.2, 40.3
1.51 (1H, m)12.2, 40.3
Ile-50.94 (3H, t, J = 7.4 Hz)12.2, q25.3, 40.3
Ile-61.02 (3H, d, J = 7.1 Hz)15.6, q25.3, 40.3, 60.9
Leu-1-171.0, s-
Leu-23.93 (1H, dd, J = 4.6, 8.5 Hz)54.6, d25.6, 45.1, 171.0, 169.2
Leu-31.72 (1H, m)45.1, t23.5, 25.6, 54.6, 171.0
1.63 (1H, m)25.6, 54.6
Leu-41.84 (1H, m)25.6, d45.1, 22.1
Leu-50.95 (3H, d, J = 6.3 Hz)22.1, q25.6, 45.1
Leu-60.96 (3H, d, J = 6.2 Hz)23.5, q25.6, 45.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, D.; Bao, L.-F.; Lei, H.-M.; Zhang, G.-K.; Li, G.-H.; Zhao, P.-J. Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from Harposporium anguillulae Against Meloidogyne incognita. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2585. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122585

AMA Style

Li D, Bao L-F, Lei H-M, Zhang G-K, Li G-H, Zhao P-J. Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from Harposporium anguillulae Against Meloidogyne incognita. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(12):2585. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Dong, Ling-Feng Bao, Hong-Mei Lei, Guang-Ke Zhang, Guo-Hong Li, and Pei-Ji Zhao. 2024. "Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from Harposporium anguillulae Against Meloidogyne incognita" Microorganisms 12, no. 12: 2585. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122585

APA Style

Li, D., Bao, L. -F., Lei, H. -M., Zhang, G. -K., Li, G. -H., & Zhao, P. -J. (2024). Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from Harposporium anguillulae Against Meloidogyne incognita. Microorganisms, 12(12), 2585. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12122585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop