Next Article in Journal
Fertilization Type Differentially Affects Barley Grain Yield and Nutrient Content, Soil and Microbial Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Extracellular Membrane Vesicles of Escherichia coli Induce Apoptosis of CT26 Colon Carcinoma Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multiomic Investigations into Lung Health and Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Metabolic Potential of the Human Lung Microbiome

by
Florian Semmler
,
Matheus Regis Belisário-Ferrari
,
Maria Kulosa
and
Leonard Kaysser
*
Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Institute for Drug Discovery, University of Leipzig, 04317 Leipzig, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2024, 12(7), 1448; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071448
Submission received: 20 June 2024 / Revised: 5 July 2024 / Accepted: 13 July 2024 / Published: 17 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Microbiome in Lung Health)

Abstract

:
The human lung microbiome remains largely underexplored, despite its potential implications in the pharmacokinetics of inhaled drugs and its involvement in lung diseases. Interactions within these bacterial communities and with the host are complex processes which often involve microbial small molecules. In this study, we employed a computational approach to describe the metabolic potential of the human lung microbiome. By utilizing antiSMASH and BiG-SCAPE software, we identified 1831 biosynthetic gene clusters for the production of specialized metabolites in a carefully compiled genome database of lung-associated bacteria and fungi. It was shown that RiPPs represent the largest class of natural products within the bacteriome, while NRPs constitute the largest class of natural products in the lung mycobiome. All predicted BGCs were further categorized into 767 gene cluster families, and a subsequent network analysis highlighted that these families are widely distributed and contain many uncharacterized members. Moreover, in-depth annotation allowed the assignment of certain gene clusters to putative lung-specific functions within the microbiome, such as osmoadaptation or surfactant synthesis. This study establishes the lung microbiome as a prolific source for secondary metabolites and lays the groundwork for detailed investigation of this unique environment.

1. Introduction

The lower airways are characterized by a warm and moist environment and provide attractive conditions for colonization by microbial communities. They are in constant contact with their aerial surroundings and in close proximity to the microbe-rich nasal and oral cavities, which ensures continuous exposure to different microorganisms. Notably, it has long been believed that the human lungs are sterile [1]. In recent years though, culture-independent molecular analyses identified a significant diversity of microorganisms in the lower respiratory tract, which previous approaches failed to detect [1].
Since then, the lung microbiome has gained increasing attention from the scientific community, but it is still vastly underexplored compared to the more established gastrointestinal and skin microbiomes [2]. This is partly due to the technical challenges in isolating and studying the low biomass and complex microbial environment of the lower respiratory tract [2]. However, understanding the nature and role of the lung microbiome in health and disease is an important element for developing personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches [3].
The lung microbiome, with its transient nature and dynamic composition significantly differs in both size and stability from the more consistent and densely populated microbiomes of regions, such as the skin, mouth, and gut. This difference is reflected in its notably lower microbial biomass of 103–105 bacteria per gram of tissue compared to 1011–1012 bacteria per gram of tissue in the gastrointestinal tract [1,4,5,6]. Some studies suggest that the lung microbiome originates from microaspirations of oral and nasal microbiotas [1,3]. However, other studies, including recent species-level evaluations, have identified distinct compositional differences between the lung and oral microbiomes. These findings indicate unique features and adaptation mechanisms in the lung microbial community [7,8,9,10].
The lung bacteriome of the healthy individuals is predominantly populated by species of Bacillota, Bacteroidota, Pseudomonadota, Fusobacteriota, and Actinomycetota, with Prevotella, Streptococcus, and Veillonella being the most prevalent genera [11,12] This diversity is dynamic and is influenced by environmental factors and health conditions [6,12]. The human lung mycobiome mainly consists of the phyla Eurotiomycetes, Saccharomycetes, Dothideomycetes, and Agaricomycetes. Some important genera within these phyla include Aspergillus, Candida, Cladosporium, Hyphodontia, and Penicillium [13,14].
Given its unique properties, the lung microbiome could serve as an excellent platform to study microbial interplay and the role of specialized metabolites. This regulation involves highly coordinated mechanisms processing, for example, communication, the secretion of bioactive compounds, and the formation of biofilms, all supporting the resilience and stability of the communities [15]. Natural products are often produced in this context as extracellular signaling molecules, which can modulate the expression of specific genes, sometimes beyond the species level [16,17]. As bioactive molecules, they can also establish colonization, suppress certain immune responses of the host, and shape microbial consortia by their selective toxicity [16,17]. Recently, human microbiomes have, thus, been explored as a source of bioactive small molecules to feed the drug development pipeline [18,19,20,21].
The human microbiomes of the gut, nose, and oral cavity have already been extensively investigated [22,23,24,25]. For instance, the chemical potential of the gut microbiome has been mapped in detail, showing a vast network of secondary metabolite BGCs, crucial for understanding microbial ecology and therapeutic applications [25]. Similarly, the BGCs from the oral microbiome, as explored by Aleti et al. 2019, highlight the diverse bacterial communication strategies involved in health and disease [23]. In contrast, the metabolic landscape of the lung microbiome remains completely undescribed. For that matter, microbiomes are not only locally influential, but affect distant organs and systems, as documented by interactions between the human lungs and the digestive tract or the brain [26,27]. While the interplay between the gut microbiome and host is well-documented [28,29], studies specifically targeting the lung microbiome in this context are still limited and demand more investigation.
In this study, we explore the metabolic potential of the human lung microbiome using a systematic computational approach [22,23,24,25]. Therefore, we compiled a specific database of 320 microorganisms associated with the human lung using the expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database V3.1 (eHOMD) [30] and the current literature. This allowed us to identify biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) using the antiSMASH software [31] and to classify them into gene cluster families (GCFs) by the BiG-SCAPE algorithm [32]. A similarity network of all the predicted BGCs revealed for the first time the vast metabolic landscape of the lung microbiome with distinct GCFs that could be assigned to putative lung-specific functions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Computational Analysis of the BGCs from the Human Lung Microbiome

The database of genome sequences from lung-associated microbes was initially created using the work of Ibironke et al. 2020 and then expanded to include bacteria and fungi using the current literature and medical case reports [10]. The reference genomes of the listed species were obtained from the National Center of Biotechnology Information genome database. If complete genome sequences were not available, corresponding shotgun sequences were used. If no genomic sequence data were available at the time of analysis, the organisms were still retained in the list and included in the construction of the phylogenetic trees. The genome sequences were then analyzed for possible biosynthetic gene clusters using Antibiotics and Secondary Metabolite Analysis Shell, version 7.0 (antiSMASH) [31]. GraphPad Prism 9 software was used to visualize the counted BGCs.

2.2. Network Analysis

The GenBank files obtained from the antiSMASH output were processed using the Biosynthetic Gene Similarity Clustering and Prospecting Engine (BiG-SCAPE) software, version 1.1.5 [32]. Thereby, the respective gene clusters were grouped into common BGC families by similarity. Different similarity cutoff values of 0.3, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 were applied for this purpose. In addition, the “mix” setting was selected to generate a network including all BGC classes. Clustering with a cutoff of 0.8 showed adequate separation of the BGC families. Cytoscape 3.10.1 [33] software was used to visualize the generated networks. Using the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster (MIBiG) database [34] and the BiG-SCAPE algorithm, the BGCs could be assigned to already known gene clusters.

2.3. Gene Cluster Comparisons

Gene cluster comparison figures were generated using the clinker workflow [35] to align and visualize the similarities of interesting gene clusters of the network with each other and with the MIBiG reference gene clusters. The GenBank output files from antiSMASH were used as the input for this. The default settings were applied for the clinker creation.

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis

Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 11 [36] was used to conduct phylogenetic analyses. First, the 16S rRNA and 28S rRNA sequences were obtained from the NCBI database. Then, two separate multiple sequence alignments were performed for the bacterial and fungal sequences using the MUSCLE algorithm. The phylogenetic trees were constructed with the neighbor-koining method using the p-distance model and by implementing a bootstrap test of 1000 replicates.
Finally, the web-based software Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) version 6.8.1 [37] was used to display the phylogenetic relationship of the organisms together with the determined BGCs.

3. Results

3.1. Compilation of a Unique Genome Database of Lung-Associated Microbes

To create a robust basis for our bioinformatic analyses, we compiled a specific database of genome sequences from lung-associated microbes (see Tables S1–S3). Therefore, we mainly relied on the work of Ibironke et al. 2020, which encompasses the most detailed catalog of bacteria within the healthy lung microbiome at the species level [10]. Our collection was further expanded to include diverse bacterial and fungal species that were previously isolated from the human lung. This approach involved a careful examination of organisms listed in the expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database V3.1 (eHOMD), cross-referenced with recent publications and medical case reports to determine their occurrence in the airways. For fungi, we relied on recent publications describing the mycobiome of the human lung (see Table S2). In total, we included 227 bacterial strains and 93 fungi to build a first representative database of the microbiome of the human lower respiratory tract.

3.2. The Human Lung Microbiome Contains a Variety of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters across Phylogenetic Boundaries

Subsequently, we employed established computational genome mining techniques to gain insights into the natural product pathways carried by these microorganisms. Using the antiSMASH 7.0 platform [31], a total of 1832 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), comprising 917 pathways from bacteria and 914 pathways from fungi were identified. These clusters were further categorized by natural product classes, e.g., non-ribosomal peptides (NRPs), terpenes, polyketides (PK), ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) and aryl polyenes. On average, bacteria feature four BGCs per organism, with a predicted overall metabolic diversity of 28% RiPPs, 18% NRPs, 9%, arylpolyenes, 9% PKs and 8% terpenes (see Figure 1). The remaining 28% belong to other classes of natural products, such as various types of metallophores (8.8%), homoserine lactones (3.5%), redox cofactors (3.4%), betalactones (3.3%), and resorcinols (2.4%). In contrast, fungi have on average almost ten BGCs per organism, being 38% NRPs, 23% PKs, 21% terpenes, 10% RiPP-like, 1% RiPPs, and 7% others (see Figure 2).
In our analysis, the Pseudomonadota exhibit the highest abundance of biosynthetic gene clusters among bacteria, with a total count of 537 BGCs and an average of 6.8 BGCs per organism (Table 1). Further investigations of this phylum showed that species of Pseudomonas, Paraburkholderia, and Microbulbifer feature a particularly rich specialized metabolism, with 13.6, 15.7, and 12.5 BGCs per organism, respectively. The phylum of Bacillota accounts for 194 of the BGCs, but with 2.9 BGCs per organism on average, the typical member of this phylum cannot be considered as particularly natural-product proficient. This observation, though, may be influenced by the number of sampled organisms or the size of their genomes. Nevertheless, recent investigations have described various human-associated Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species as metabolically versatile [38,39,40,41]. Actually, with a respective 4.4 and 6.5 BGCs per organism on average, these genera may also play a role as natural product producers in the human lung. Another BGC rich group of bacteria include several representatives of the genus Mycobacterium from the phylum Actinomycetota, with an average of 11.5 BGCs per organism. Mycobacteria are known to exercise a diverse repertoire of metabolic capacities [42].
Among the fungi, the Ascomycota (14.7) have substantially more BGCs per organism than the Basidomycota (4.9). Within the Ascomycota group, there are large differences in the distribution of gene clusters among the various phyla. For example, the Eurotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes, and Sordariomycetes have a particularly high number of gene clusters with a total of 334, 205, and 108 BGCs, respectively. Some genera, such as Aspergillus, Alternaria, and Bionectria, show a particularly extensive secondary metabolism with 70.5, 38.5, and 79 BGCs per organism, respectively. Filamentous fungi of the genus Aspergillus are known for their metabolic capacities and, therefore, have a wide range of biotechnological applications [43,44,45,46]. Various secondary metabolites have already been described from Alternaria and Bionectria species [47,48,49]. Among the Basidomycota, representatives of the Agaricomycetes phylum, such as Trametes spp., Piptoporus betulinus, Pleurotus pulmonarius, and Plicaturopsis crispa, contain a particularly high number of BGCs.

3.3. Correlation between Genome Size and BGC Count

To evaluate the correlation between genome size and BGC count in the lung microbiome, we plotted the average sequence size against the number of BGCs per organism (Figure 3). Our analysis indicates a positive correlation between these two traits. This is in line with studies by Cimermancic et al. 2014 (R2 = 0.56) and Stubbendieck et al. 2021 (τB = 0.35), which observed a similarly strong correlation between these two variables [50,51]. Similar to other specific ecological niches, the lung microbiome appears to be inhabited by highly adaptable generalists with large genomes and numerous different pathways for diverse ecological situations. On the other hand, there are small-genome specialists that are highly adapted to their host and which have likely lost most of the non-essential genetic information in the co-evolution process.

3.4. A Similarity Network of Gene Cluster Families Reveals a Multitude of New Putative Secondary Metabolites

A sequence similarity network (SSN) was generated using the BiG-SCAPE algorithm to investigate the detected gene clusters and their structural relationship. The resulting SSN consists of 1154 nodes with 4268 connecting edges (see Figure 4). The separation of homologous gene clusters into distinct families was achieved with a cutoff value of 0.8. Therefore, a total of 767 of these gene cluster families (GCFs) consisting of at least two different BGCs and 520 singletons were identified (see Table S4). The annotation of the GCFs was additionally informed by the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster (MIBiG) database [34].
At the center of the network is an extensive supercluster, dominated by diverse type I PKS pathways from fungi. Similar to NRPs, type I polyketides are produced via large, modular, multi-enzymatic megasynthases. They are primarily found in bacteria and fungi, but have also been reported from algae, sponges, and mollusks [52,53]. Whereas type I PKS in bacteria mostly consist of linear multi-modular assembly lines, in fungi the majority of such systems are mono-modular and iterative. In both cases, an immense structural diversity is produced, correlating to a similar variety of bioactivities. In contrast, a number of other GCFs are considerably better defined and allow functional predictions. Two GCFs are predicted to encode for so-called compatible solutes, namely GCF 8 for ectoin-like compounds and GCF 24 for N-acetylglutaminylglutamine amide (NAGGN) derivatives. Furthermore, a variety of different GCFs with putative antioxidant function can be found, such as GCFs 12 and 45 as analogs to the peptide redox cofactor pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ), GCF 7, 11, 17, 37, and 53 with similarities to carotenoid gene clusters, and potential aryl polyenes in GCF 15, 20, 34, 40, 46, 47, 51, and 52. Various GCFs could be assigned to natural product classes with putative antimicrobial functions, such as antimicrobial RiPPs (GCF 3, 9, 10, 19, 27, 29, 32, 33, 41, 42, and 44), betalactones (GCF 3, 9, 10, 27, and 29), and hydrogen cyanides (GCF 1). Putative pathways for communication in the lung microbiome were found in gene clusters of GCF 16, 21, 38, 49, and 50 as N-acyl homoserine lactones and in GCF 30 as cyclic lactone autoinducers. In addition, it was predicted that BGCs of GCF 2, 9, and 10 encode for natural products that could be related to surfactant synthesis. Finally, a number of GCFs, such as 2, 5, 6, 14, 18, 22, 23, 26, 35, 36, and 43, were also identified in our analysis as containing potential metal chelator pathways.

4. Discussion

The aim of the study is to provide a first description of the metabolic landscape of the human lung microbiome in order to establish the basis for the investigation of undescribed gene clusters, and also to find the association of gene cluster families with functions within this microbial community. One of the first systematic studies of this kind was carried out by Cimermancic et al., who searched for putative BGCs in 1154 sequenced genomes from all bacterial phyla in order to create a global map of the biosynthetic universe [50]. Here, too, the Pseudomonadota represented the largest phylum in the analysis, which was particularly characterized by the widespread distribution of different groups of aryl polyenes. Our analysis showed that the Pseudomondota also dominate the bacteriome of the lung. However, we found RiPPs to be the most abundant type of pathways. This may be explained by the fact that RiPPs have been extensively investigated in the last ten years and were given a universal nomenclature by Arnison et al. only in 2013 [54].
In a recent study, Aleti et al. explored the metabolic potential of the oral microbiome [23]. Because the lung microbiome is considered to mainly originate from the microbial communities of the upper airways, it is worth comparing the results from Aleti et al. with our data. Notably, the most diverse phyla in terms of BGCs are consistent in both the oral and the lung microbiome, including Pseudomonadota, Bacillota, Actinomycetota, and Bacteroidota, respectively. Furthermore, the distribution of BGCs across these groups also demonstrated similarities. For example, RiPPs emerged as the most abundant BGC type in the oral microbiome, followed by NRPS and aryl polyenes, which matches the hierarchy identified by our analysis of the lung microbiome. These shared characteristics lend support to the hypothesis of microaspiration as a major driving force behind lung microbiome development. However, a study by Stubbendieck et al., which investigated the specialized metabolism of the aerodigestive tract microbiome, revealed significant differences both in the composition of the respective microbiota and in the distribution of the corresponding BGCs [51]. This distinct biogeography of the upper respiratory tract underlines the need for a closer examination of the microbiome of the lower respiratory tract and the lungs with regard to its metabolic potential.

4.1. BGC Distribution and Metabolic Diversity

In general, our analysis of the lung mycobiome shows a two-part image in respect of chemical capacity. A few organisms are very rich in BGCs, while the majority carry only a small number or no pathways for the common types of secondary metabolites. In addition, the natural product classes are differently distributed in fungi compared to in bacteria. In our analysis, NRPs, PKs, and terpenes are much more frequent, whereas RiPPs appear to play a minor role in fungi. However, this result may be biased because these compounds have not been investigated in fungi for very long. In 2007, the elucidation of the biosynthetic pathway of amanitin marked the first RiPP of fungal origin [55]. Since then, only four subclasses of fungal RiPPs have been characterized. Although many of these RiPPs, such as amatoxins or phallotoxins, show toxic effects to humans, their genuine ecological functions are not known [56].
The high abundance of BGCs in Pseudomonadota, especially in species of Pseudomonas, Paraburkholderia, and Microbulbifer, aligns with their known adaptability to nutrient-poor and challenging environments [57,58,59,60,61,62]. Their diverse secondary metabolism likely contributes to their robust biological defense mechanisms, enabling them to outcompete or inhibit the growth of microbial contenders. In fungi, the significant metabolic capacities of Eurotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes, and Sordariomycetes, as exemplified by genera, like Aspergillus, Alternaria, and Bionectria, reflect their wide range of biotechnological applications. The presence of numerous BGCs in these groups underscores their potential as prolific sources of natural products.

4.2. Assignment of Putative Pathways for Osmoadaptation

In our analysis, two different types of pathways were predicted to be responsible for the production of so-called compatible solutes, i.e., the ectoin-like and N-acetylglutaminylglutamine amide (NAGGN)-like BGCs. In the SSN, the ectoin cluster is found in GCF 8 with five nodes and in the NAGGN cluster as GCF 24 with eight nodes (Figure 4). Here, both of them are only present in organisms of the Pseudomonadota and are particularly widespread within the genus Pseudomonas. Both compound classes have been described as osmoprotective secondary metabolites [63,64,65,66]. When microorganisms colonize the human lung, they are confronted with the constantly changing osmotic conditions accompanied by the human respiratory cycle [67]. For example, it has been known for a long time that exercise-induced hyperventilation can lead to hyperosmolar conditions in the airways [68]. It is, therefore, important for lung microbiota to have effective systems to cope with high osmolarities [69]. This osmoadaptation can be mediated by the synthesis of osmoprotective substances, such as ectoins and NAGGN, which prevent swelling and cell lysis under these conditions [70,71]. Some of these osmoprotective metabolites have also been associated with virulence factors in pathogenic bacteria [70].

4.3. Assignment of Putative Pathways for Antioxidants

The lung promotes gas exchange for the entire human body and is, thus, especially susceptible to oxidative stress. This can be facilitated by external exposures, such as air pollution, or internal mechanisms, as in inflammation. As a countermeasure, bacteria and fungi may produce small-molecule antioxidants to protect themselves from reactive oxygen species that are typically abundant in such situations. Notably, our analyses predicted 29 gene clusters that produce compounds similar to the peptide redox cofactor pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) [72], summarized in GCF 12 and GCF 45. This peptide is important in the methylotrophic metabolism and ethanol/glucose utilization in proteobacteria and few others [72]. In our analysis the corresponding BGCs are mainly found in Pseudomonadota, such as Pseudomonas, Paraburkholderia, and Enterobacter, as well as specific representatives of the phylum Actinomycetota. These include some pathogenic species, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The antioxidant effect of PQQ has been demonstrated in vivo. But PQQ has also been detected in mammalian and human tissue samples [73,74,75] and been described as a “longevity vitamin” for humans [76,77]. The production of PQQ by lung-associated bacteria might, thus, be beneficial for the host. Since some PQQ-producing bacteria establish symbiotic relationships with other microorganisms, the possible involvement of PQQ derivatives in the human lung in microbe-host interaction could be an interesting subject for further investigation [72].
Another group of antioxidants are small-molecule pigments e.g., carotenoid-type terpenoids and aryl polyene-type polyketides. With their extensively conjugated systems, such compounds are able to scavenge high-energy radicals and are particularly indispensable for photosynthetically active organisms [78]. However, their functions go much further, as they have been correlated with protection against extreme temperatures and UV radiation, antimicrobial activity, and the ability to acquire nutrients [79,80,81,82].
In our analysis, many of the 264 identified terpene-synthesizing pathways can be assigned to reference gene clusters of carotenoids, such as β-carotene or zeaxanthin (see Figure S1). They mostly originate from different Pseudomonadota, such as Pseudomonas spp. and Pantoea spp., Novosphingobium panipatense and Paracoccus yeei, but also from fungi, such as Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus flavus and Plectosphaerella cucumerina. These BGCs cluster in GCFs 7, 11, 17, 37, and 53. Furthermore, BGCs which code for potential aryl polyenes are found in GCF 15, 20, 34, 40, 46, 47, 51, and 52 (see Figure S2). This group has similar antioxidant properties to the chemically related but biosynthetically distinct carotenoids [50]. In our SSN, these gene clusters originate from various Prevotella, Paraburkholderia, Aggregatibacter, and Pseudomonas species.

4.4. Assignment of Putative Pathways for Antimicrobials

Metabolites with antimicrobial activity play a decisive role in regulating the stability of the microbiome and its different subpopulations. They either act specifically against certain groups or non-specifically against many different species. Not surprisingly, various of these compounds can be found in our network. These include different classes of RiPPs, such as lanthipeptides (GCF 41 and 44), thiopeptides (GCF 19 and 32), and linear azole-containing peptides (LAP) (GCF 33 and 42) [83,84,85], but also some betalactone compounds (GCF 3, 9, 10, 27, and 29) [86,87,88,89,90].
An interesting example of highly targeted antimicrobial activity may be represented by a putative BGC from Streptococcus intermedius, that is homologous to the gene clusters of tryglysin from Streptococcus mutans and streptide from Streptococcus thermophilus (see Figure S3). These radical S-adenosylmethionine (RaS)-type RiPPs have been shown to exhibit growth-inhibitory activity against Streptococcus spp. but have also been studied in the context of intraspecies communication [91,92,93]. Their biosynthesis is regulated by a bona fide short hydrophobic peptide (SHP)/Rgg quorum-sensing mechanism, which is conserved throughout the genus Streptococcus. Consequently, it was demonstrated that tryglysin modulates specifically the growth of streptococci, but not other Gram-positive organisms [93]. Since the genus Streptococcus is an important group within the respiratory system, such antibacterial metabolites have the potential to be influential regulators of the lung microbiome. For example, by specifically inhibiting the growth of commensal streptococci, this imbalance could be exploited by non-streptococci pathogens. Or, vice versa, commensal Streptococcus spp. could suppress establishment of pathogenic streptococci at potential infection sites.
GCF 9 contains twenty different betalactone gene clusters. They derive from diverse genera, such as Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Aspergillus. Betalactones exhibit a highly reactive four-membered heterocycle of an electrophilic nature [94]. This reactivity gives rise to a diverse range of possible biological properties [95], e.g., antimicrobial and anti-cancer activity [86]. But, generally, these molecules inhibit hydrolytic enzymes, including proteases and lipases, which are ubiquitously secreted into the lung surface liquid by human tissue cells and colonizing microorganisms. Whether betalactones could have a protective role in such an environment for commensal or pathogenic bacteria would be an interesting subject for further investigations. In general, analogous clusters have been identified in both bacterial and fungal contexts [95,96,97].
In our model, GCF 1 with 17 members can be assigned to the synthesis of hydrogen cyanide (HCN) by different species of the Pseudomonadota, such as Burkholderia cepacia, Brucella anthropi, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, and Pseudomonas fluorescens. It has recently been shown that the respiratory pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa [98] produces airborne volatile hydrogen cyanides and thereby inhibits the growth of Staphylococcus aureus. This is a particularly relevant mechanism in the prognosis of cystic fibrosis, as both bacteria are most prevalent in the mucus of patients with this lung disease [99,100]. The expression of HCN gene clusters is often dependent on the population density of P. aeruginosa and is controlled by quorum sensing [101]. By using cyanide-deficient mutants of Pseudomonas strains and subsequent transcriptome analyses in environmental samples, it could be shown that a variety of different cellular processes, such as their ability to take up iron and their swimming motility, are influenced by HCN both endogenously and exogenously [102]. Accordingly, there may be a multi-layered potential influence within the lung microbiome as well. Interestingly, GCF 1 includes mainly non-pathogenic species, opening speculations about a suppressive role of HCNs in the lung against the colonization of Staphylococcus aureus.

4.5. Assignment of Putative Pathways for Communication

A highly regulated coordination has been described for many essential processes within the microbiome, such as the formation of biofilms, sporulation, bioluminescence, toxin production, and swarming [103]. One of the most important communication mechanisms is quorum sensing, the population-dependent expression of target genes. Quorum sensing relies on the secretion of autoinducers, specialized secondary metabolites [104,105]. Different groups of bacteria apply different compounds as signaling molecules. The homoserine lactones are a group of autoinducers from Gram-negative bacteria which have been studied extensively, in particular the N-acyl homoserine lactones [106,107,108]. In our SSN, the 17 members of this group are organized in 5 different GCFs (16, 21, 38, 49, and 50), and derived from Pseudomonadota, for example from various species of Neisseria, Paraburkholderia, and Pantoea. In these GCFs, the BGCs are grouped together with other BGCs from their respective genus.
In contrast, Gram-positive bacteria usually use small peptides as autoinducer molecules [104]. One of these groups, the so-called cyclic lactone autoinducers, can also be found in our network. This group consists of six nodes that are summarized in GCF 30. These compounds usually consist of seven to nine amino acids and have a variable amino acid sequence [109]. However, a thiolactone ring consisting of five amino acids appears to be relevant for their function, which is present in all described specimens of this group [109]. The gene clusters have so far only been reported from Staphylococcus species, matching the results in our SSN.

4.6. Assignment of Putative Pathways for Surfactants

A number of different NRPS gene clusters were identified that are predicted to encode for lipopeptides with the ability to lower surface tension. These biosurfactants are secondary metabolites with similar biophysical properties to human pulmonary surfactant, and are involved in processes, such as swarming motility, biofilm formation, and chemical warfare [110,111]. In GCFs 2, 9, and 10, a total of 16 BGCs from the Pseudomonadota and Bacillota, such as Bacillus altitudinis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Delftia acidovorans, Microbulbifer halophilus, and Bacillus anthracis, are homologous to pathways from the known biosurfactant lipopeptides fengycin, surfactin, iturin, viscosin, or entolysin. Since these lipopeptides can also be found in fungi, BGCs from Aspergillus flavus could be assigned to the reference gene cluster of syringafactin and from Aspergillus versicolor to the reference gene cluster of fengycin (see Figure S4). The lung-associated microbial communities mostly reside within the extracellular mucus layer. Changes in the texture, viscosity, and other physicochemical characteristics of mucus have great effects on the accessibility and stability of this ecological niche and its inhabitants. It could be speculated that the organisms of the human lung microbiome form small-molecule biosurfactants to modulate mucus properties and, thus, facilitate colonization in this environment. Furthermore, the amphiphilic molecular properties of those lipopeptides can reduce the surface tension of the pulmonary liquid to impair host-derived defense mechanisms of the respiratory tract. Since both bacterial and fungal gene clusters with similarities to these lipopeptides are found, it is possible that they confer a potential survival advantage in the human lung.

4.7. Assignment of Putative Pathways for Metal Chelators

The acquisition of metal ions, which are structurally and catalytically integrated into many essential proteins, poses a particular challenge for microorganisms [112]. This task is, therefore, both part of interspecies competition and an opportunity for the host to influence the growth of the organisms through targeted retention of nutrients, so-called nutritional immunity [113,114]. Many microorganisms produce specialized small molecules that can bind metal ions from the environment with great affinity and selectivity and can then be reabsorbed by specific transporters [115]. Depending on the metals they bind, these metallophores are referred to as siderophores (Fe3+), zincophores (Zn2+), chalcophores (Cu2+), molybdophores (Mo4+/MoO42−), or nickelophores (Ni2+) [116,117]. They are produced by both fungi and bacteria and are also relevant as pathogenicity factors due to their crucial role in metal homeostasis [118,119].
Consequently, our SSN analysis revealed a number of different metallophore gene clusters in the human lung microbiome. For example, we have found twelve putative zincophore gene clusters of the Cnt-type [112] in the phyla Pseudomonadota and Bacillota. Here, BGCs from Staphylococcus spp., Brucella anthropi, Furfurilactobacillus rossiae, Serratia marcescens, Yersinia pestis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and others show homology to certain representatives of zincophore pathways producing, e.g., bacillopalins, staphylopins, pseudopalins, or yersinopins (see Figure S5). In addition, we discovered numerous pathways for siderophores, which is the most studied group of metallophores, in GCFs 2, 5, 6, 14, 18, 22, 23, 26, 35, 36, and 43. According to their biosynthesis one can distinguish NRPS-independent siderophores, such as aerobactin from NRPS-dependent ones, such as enterobactin (see Figure S6). While most of the BGCs for the NRPS-independent metallophores are grouped in GCF 5, 6, 18, 22, 26, 35, and 43, the NRP-dependent metallophores can be found in GCF 2, 5, 14, 23, and 36. Ten BGCs show similarities to aerobactin, whereas twenty BGCs show similarities to enterobactin. One of the putative gene clusters for the synthesis of enterobactin was found in the Gram-positive bacterium Rothia mucilogenosa, also a known inhabitant of the human oral cavity [120. Notably, previous studies have established a link between Rothia species in the oral microbiome and the iron balance in this niche [120]. It has been shown that the enterobactin produced by Rothia mucilogenosa influences the availability of iron both for the human host and for other members of the microbiome. Moreover, this compound is able to inhibit the growth of cariogenic strains of Streptococcus mutans, commensal oral Streptococcus species, of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and oral Actinomyces timonensis [120]. A specific mechanism behind this observation is not yet known, but it, therefore, might be a potential therapeutic target for further investigation.

5. Conclusions

Our study reveals the extensive metabolic potential of the human lung microbiome, highlighting a diverse network of biosynthetic gene clusters. We identified numerous previously undescribed BGCs, which likely play decisive roles in environmental adaptation, microbial competition, nutrient acquisition, and communication, underscoring the lung microbiome’s unique metabolic diversity. The discovery of these new BGCs suggests the lung microbiome as a promising source of novel natural products, which could be developed into therapeutic agents. Understanding these metabolic pathways provides a basis for future research into innovative treatments for respiratory diseases, targeting specific microbial interactions and metabolic functions. Moreover, our analysis opens the perspective for the usage of specific metabolites as biomarkers in diagnostics or prognosis for the success of therapy in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms12071448/s1, Figure S1: Gene cluster comparison of different exemplary terpene geneclusters from our analysis and MIBiG reference clusters; Figure S2: Gene cluster comparison of different exemplary arylpolyene geneclusters from our analysis; Figure S3: Gene cluster comparison of different RaS-RiPP geneclusters within the genus Streptococcus and MIBiG reference clusters; Figure S4: BiG-SCAPE sequence similarity network (SSN) of different lipopeptide geneclusters and MIBiG reference clusters; Figure S5: Gene cluster comparison of different zincophore geneclusters and MIBiG reference clusters; Figure S6: BiG-SCAPE sequence similarity network (SSN) of different siderophore geneclusters from the enterobactin group and MIBiG reference clusters; Table S1: List of human lung bacteriome; Table S2: References for the human lung mycobiome; Table S3: List of human lung mycobiome; Table S4: List of GCFs of the SSN of the human lung microbiome [121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.S. and L.K.; methodology, F.S. and L.K.; software, F.S.; validation, F.S.; formal analysis, F.S. and M.R.B.-F.; investigation, F.S.; resources, L.K.; data curation, F.S.; writing—original draft preparation, F.S., M.R.B.-F., and M.K.; writing—review and editing, M.R.B.-F., M.K., and L.K.; visualization, F.S. and M.R.B.-F.; supervision, L.K.; project administration, L.K.; funding acquisition, L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article and Supplemental Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yagi, K.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Lukacs, N.W.; Asai, N. The Lung Microbiome during Health and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Charlson, E.S.; Bittinger, K.; Haas, A.R.; Fitzgerald, A.S.; Frank, I.; Yadav, A.; Bushman, F.D.; Collman, R.G. Topographical continuity of bacterial populations in the healthy human respiratory tract. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011, 184, 957–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huffnagle, G.B.; Dickson, R.P.; Lukacs, N.W. The respiratory tract microbiome and lung inflammation: A two-way street. Mucosal Immunol. 2017, 10, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hillman, E.T.; Lu, H.; Yao, T.; Nakatsu, C.H. Microbial Ecology along the Gastrointestinal Tract. Microbes Environ. 2017, 32, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chunxi, L.; Haiyue, L.; Yanxia, L.; Jianbing, P.; Jin, S. The Gut Microbiota and Respiratory Diseases: New Evidence. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 2340670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Whiteside, S.A.; McGinniss, J.E.; Collman, R.G. The lung microbiome: Progress and promise. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e150473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maddi, A.; Sabharwal, A.; Violante, T.; Manuballa, S.; Genco, R.; Patnaik, S.; Yendamuri, S. The microbiome and lung cancer. J. Thorac. Dis. 2019, 11, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pragman, A.A.; Lyu, T.; Baller, J.A.; Gould, T.J.; Kelly, R.F.; Reilly, C.S.; Isaacson, R.E.; Wendt, C.H. The lung tissue microbiota of mild and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Microbiome 2018, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bassis, C.M.; Erb-Downward, J.R.; Dickson, R.P.; Freeman, C.M.; Schmidt, T.M.; Young, V.B.; Beck, J.M.; Curtis, J.L.; Huffnagle, G.B. Analysis of the upper respiratory tract microbiotas as the source of the lung and gastric microbiotas in healthy individuals. mBio 2015, 6, e00037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ibironke, O.; McGuinness, L.R.; Lu, S.-E.; Wang, Y.; Hussain, S.; Weisel, C.P.; Kerkhof, L.J. Species-level evaluation of the human respiratory microbiome. Gigascience 2020, 9, giaa038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dickson, R.P.; Erb-Downward, J.R.; Freeman, C.M.; McCloskey, L.; Falkowski, N.R.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Curtis, J.L. Bacterial Topography of the Healthy Human Lower Respiratory Tract. mBio 2017, 8, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Moffatt, M.F.; Cookson, W.O. The lung microbiome in health and disease. Clin. Med. 2017, 17, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Charlson, E.S.; Diamond, J.M.; Bittinger, K.; Fitzgerald, A.S.; Yadav, A.; Haas, A.R.; Bushman, F.D.; Collman, R.G. Lung-enriched organisms and aberrant bacterial and fungal respiratory microbiota after lung transplant. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 186, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Delhaes, L.; Monchy, S.; Fréalle, E.; Hubans, C.; Salleron, J.; Leroy, S.; Prevotat, A.; Wallet, F.; Wallaert, B.; Dei-Cas, E.; et al. The airway microbiota in cystic fibrosis: A complex fungal and bacterial community--implications for therapeutic management. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, Y.; Rebuffat, S. The manifold roles of microbial ribosomal peptide-based natural products in physiology and ecology. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 34–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Papenfort, K.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Meinwald, J. Natural products as molecular messengers. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Donia, M.S.; Fischbach, M.A. HUMAN MICROBIOTA. Small molecules from the human microbiota. Science 2015, 349, 1254766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Milshteyn, A.; Colosimo, D.A.; Brady, S.F. Accessing Bioactive Natural Products from the Human Microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barber, C.C.; Zhang, W. Small molecule natural products in human nasal/oral microbiota. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 48, kuab010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, Z.; Zhang, W. Signaling Natural Products from Human Pathogenic Bacteria. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Donia, M.S.; Cimermancic, P.; Schulze, C.J.; Wieland Brown, L.C.; Martin, J.; Mitreva, M.; Clardy, J.; Linington, R.G.; Fischbach, M.A. A systematic analysis of biosynthetic gene clusters in the human microbiome reveals a common family of antibiotics. Cell 2014, 158, 1402–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aleti, G.; Baker, J.L.; Tang, X.; Alvarez, R.; Dinis, M.; Tran, N.C.; Melnik, A.V.; Zhong, C.; Ernst, M.; Dorrestein, P.C.; et al. Identification of the Bacterial Biosynthetic Gene Clusters of the Oral Microbiome Illuminates the Unexplored Social Language of Bacteria during Health and Disease. mBio 2019, 10, e00321-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zou, H.; Sun, T.; Jin, B.; Wang, S. sBGC-hm: An atlas of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters from the human gut microbiome. Bioinformatics 2023, 39, btad131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hirsch, P.; Tagirdzhanov, A.; Kushnareva, A.; Olkhovskii, I.; Graf, S.; Schmartz, G.P.; Hegemann, J.D.; Bozhüyük, K.A.J.; Müller, R.; Keller, A.; et al. ABC-HuMi: The Atlas of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in the Human Microbiome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, D579–D585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gokulan, K.; Joshi, M.; Khare, S.; Bartter, T. Lung microbiome, gut-lung axis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2022, 28, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bajinka, O.; Simbilyabo, L.; Tan, Y.; Jabang, J.; Saleem, S.A. Lung-brain axis. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 48, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sandrini, S.; Aldriwesh, M.; Alruways, M.; Freestone, P. Microbial endocrinology: Host-bacteria communication within the gut microbiome. J. Endocrinol. 2015, 225, R21–R34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lyte, M. Microbial Endocrinology: Interkingdom Signaling in Infectious Disease and Health; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-20214-3. [Google Scholar]
  30. Escapa, I.F.; Chen, T.; Huang, Y.; Gajare, P.; Dewhirst, F.E.; Lemon, K.P. New Insights into Human Nostril Microbiome from the Expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database (eHOMD): A Resource for the Microbiome of the Human Aerodigestive Tract. mSystems 2018, 3, e00187-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Augustijn, H.E.; Reitz, Z.L.; Biermann, F.; Alanjary, M.; Fetter, A.; Terlouw, B.R.; Metcalf, W.W.; Helfrich, E.J.N.; et al. antiSMASH 7.0: New and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W46–W50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Navarro-Muñoz, J.C.; Selem-Mojica, N.; Mullowney, M.W.; Kautsar, S.A.; Tryon, J.H.; Parkinson, E.I.; De Los Santos, E.L.C.; Yeong, M.; Cruz-Morales, P.; Abubucker, S.; et al. A computational framework to explore large-scale biosynthetic diversity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Terlouw, B.R.; Blin, K.; Navarro-Muñoz, J.C.; Avalon, N.E.; Chevrette, M.G.; Egbert, S.; Lee, S.; Meijer, D.; Recchia, M.J.J.; Reitz, Z.L.; et al. MIBiG 3.0: A community-driven effort to annotate experimentally validated biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D603–D610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gilchrist, C.L.M.; Chooi, Y.-H. clinker & clustermap.js: Automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics 2021, 37, 2473–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 3022–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W293–W296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Abranches, J.; Zeng, L.; Kajfasz, J.K.; Palmer, S.R.; Chakraborty, B.; Wen, Z.T.; Richards, V.P.; Brady, L.J.; Lemos, J.A. Biology of Oral Streptococci. Microbiol. Spectr. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lemos, J.A.; Palmer, S.R.; Zeng, L.; Wen, Z.T.; Kajfasz, J.K.; Freires, I.A.; Abranches, J.; Brady, L.J. The Biology of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Oliveira, A.S.; Saraiva, L.M.; Carvalho, S.M. Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms undergo metabolic and matrix remodeling under nitrosative stress. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1200923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Richardson, A.R. Virulence and Metabolism. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mashabela, G.T.; De Wet, T.J.; Warner, D.F. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Metabolism. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Huang, X.; Men, P.; Tang, S.; Lu, X. Aspergillus terreus as an industrial filamentous fungus for pharmaceutical biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 69, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Park, H.-S.; Jun, S.-C.; Han, K.-H.; Hong, S.-B.; Yu, J.-H. Diversity, Application, and Synthetic Biology of Industrially Important Aspergillus Fungi. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 100, 161–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Volke-Sepulveda, T.; Salgado-Bautista, D.; Bergmann, C.; Wells, L.; Gutierrez-Sanchez, G.; Favela-Torres, E. Secretomic Insight into Glucose Metabolism of Aspergillus brasiliensis in Solid-State Fermentation. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 3856–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yang, K.; Tian, J.; Keller, N.P. Post-translational modifications drive secondary metabolite biosynthesis in Aspergillus: A review. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 24, 2857–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lou, J.; Fu, L.; Peng, Y.; Zhou, L. Metabolites from Alternaria fungi and their bioactivities. Molecules 2013, 18, 5891–5935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ebrahim, W.; Kjer, J.; El Amrani, M.; Wray, V.; Lin, W.; Ebel, R.; Lai, D.; Proksch, P. Pullularins E and F, two new peptides from the endophytic fungus Bionectria ochroleuca isolated from the mangrove plant Sonneratia caseolaris. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 1081–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Takaoka, S.; Kurata, M.; Harimoto, Y.; Hatta, R.; Yamamoto, M.; Akimitsu, K.; Tsuge, T. Complex regulation of secondary metabolism controlling pathogenicity in the phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata. New Phytol. 2014, 202, 1297–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cimermancic, P.; Medema, M.H.; Claesen, J.; Kurita, K.; Wieland Brown, L.C.; Mavrommatis, K.; Pati, A.; Godfrey, P.A.; Koehrsen, M.; Clardy, J.; et al. Insights into secondary metabolism from a global analysis of prokaryotic biosynthetic gene clusters. Cell 2014, 158, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stubbendieck, R.M.; Zelasko, S.E.; Safdar, N.; Currie, C.R. Biogeography of Bacterial Communities and Specialized Metabolism in Human Aerodigestive Tract Microbiomes. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e0166921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cummings, M.; Breitling, R.; Takano, E. Steps towards the synthetic biology of polyketide biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 351, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Štiblariková, M.; Lásiková, A.; Gracza, T. Benzyl Alcohol/Salicylaldehyde-Type Polyketide Metabolites of Fungi: Sources, Biosynthesis, Biological Activities, and Synthesis. Mar. Drugs 2022, 21, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Arnison, P.G.; Bibb, M.J.; Bierbaum, G.; Bowers, A.A.; Bugni, T.S.; Bulaj, G.; Camarero, J.A.; Campopiano, D.J.; Challis, G.L.; Clardy, J.; et al. Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: Overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2013, 30, 108–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Hallen, H.E.; Luo, H.; Scott-Craig, J.S.; Walton, J.D. Gene family encoding the major toxins of lethal Amanita mushrooms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19097–19101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ford, R.E.; Foster, G.D.; Bailey, A.M. Exploring fungal RiPPs from the perspective of chemical ecology. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 2022, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. González, J.M.; Mayer, F.; Moran, M.A.; Hodson, R.E.; Whitman, W.B. Microbulbifer hydrolyticus gen. nov., sp. nov., and Marinobacterium georgiense gen. nov., sp. nov., two marine bacteria from a lignin-rich pulp mill waste enrichment community. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997, 47, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Nelson, K.E.; Weinel, C.; Paulsen, I.T.; Dodson, R.J.; Hilbert, H.; Martins dos Santos, V.A.P.; Fouts, D.E.; Gill, S.R.; Pop, M.; Holmes, M.; et al. Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the metabolically versatile Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 4, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Vanwijnsberghe, S.; Peeters, C.; De Ridder, E.; Dumolin, C.; Wieme, A.D.; Boon, N.; Vandamme, P. Genomic Aromatic Compound Degradation Potential of Novel Paraburkholderia Species: Paraburkholderia domus sp. nov., Paraburkholderia haematera sp. nov. and Paraburkholderia nemoris sp. nov. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Buijs, Y.; Bech, P.K.; Vazquez-Albacete, D.; Bentzon-Tilia, M.; Sonnenschein, E.C.; Gram, L.; Zhang, S.-D. Marine Proteobacteria as a source of natural products: Advances in molecular tools and strategies. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2019, 36, 1333–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Puri, A.W. Specialized Metabolites from Methylotrophic Proteobacteria. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2019, 33, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Timmermans, M.L.; Paudel, Y.P.; Ross, A.C. Investigating the Biosynthesis of Natural Products from Marine Proteobacteria: A Survey of Molecules and Strategies. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. D’Souza-Ault, M.R.; Smith, L.T.; Smith, G.M. Roles of N-acetylglutaminylglutamine amide and glycine betaine in adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to osmotic stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1993, 59, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sagot, B.; Gaysinski, M.; Mehiri, M.; Guigonis, J.-M.; Le Rudulier, D.; Alloing, G. Osmotically induced synthesis of the dipeptide N-acetylglutaminylglutamine amide is mediated by a new pathway conserved among bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12652–12657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Liu, M.; Liu, H.; Shi, M.; Jiang, M.; Li, L.; Zheng, Y. Microbial production of ectoine and hydroxyectoine as high-value chemicals. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hermann, L.; Mais, C.-N.; Czech, L.; Smits, S.H.J.; Bange, G.; Bremer, E. The ups and downs of ectoine: Structural enzymology of a major microbial stress protectant and versatile nutrient. Biol. Chem. 2020, 401, 1443–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Poolman, B.; Glaasker, E. Regulation of compatible solute accumulation in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 29, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bermon, S. Airway inflammation and upper respiratory tract infection in athletes: Is there a link? Exerc. Immunol. Rev. 2007, 13, 6–14. [Google Scholar]
  69. Csonka, L.N. Physiological and genetic responses of bacteria to osmotic stress. Microbiol Rev 1989, 53, 121–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sleator, R.D.; Hill, C. Bacterial osmoadaptation: The role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 26, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kempf, B.; Bremer, E. Uptake and synthesis of compatible solutes as microbial stress responses to high-osmolality environments. Arch. Microbiol. 1998, 170, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhu, W.; Klinman, J.P. Biogenesis of the peptide-derived redox cofactor pyrroloquinoline quinone. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2020, 59, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Mitchell, A.E.; Jones, A.D.; Mercer, R.S.; Rucker, R.B. Characterization of pyrroloquinoline quinone amino acid derivatives by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and detection in human milk. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 269, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kumazawa, T.; Seno, H.; Urakami, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Suzuki, O. Trace levels of pyrroloquinoline quinone in human and rat samples detected by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1992, 1156, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Misra, H.S.; Rajpurohit, Y.S.; Khairnar, N.P. Pyrroloquinoline-quinone and its versatile roles in biological processes. J. Biosci. 2012, 37, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kasahara, T.; Kato, T. Nutritional biochemistry: A new redox-cofactor vitamin for mammals. Nature 2003, 422, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ames, B.N. Prolonging healthy aging: Longevity vitamins and proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 10836–10844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Chew, A.G.M.; Bryant, D.A. Chlorophyll biosynthesis in bacteria: The origins of structural and functional diversity. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Baron, S.S.; Rowe, J.J. Antibiotic action of pyocyanin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1981, 20, 814–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Romero-Martinez, R.; Wheeler, M.; Guerrero-Plata, A.; Rico, G.; Torres-Guerrero, H. Biosynthesis and functions of melanin in Sporothrix schenckii. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 3696–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Paolo, W.F.; Dadachova, E.; Mandal, P.; Casadevall, A.; Szaniszlo, P.J.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Effects of disrupting the polyketide synthase gene WdPKS1 in Wangiella Exophiala dermatitidis on melanin production and resistance to killing by antifungal compounds, enzymatic degradation, and extremes in temperature. BMC Microbiol. 2006, 6, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chatfield, C.H.; Cianciotto, N.P. The secreted pyomelanin pigment of Legionella pneumophila confers ferric reductase activity. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 4062–4070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. van der Donk, W.A.; Nair, S.K. Structure and mechanism of lanthipeptide biosynthetic enzymes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2014, 29, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Takuma, M.; Kuroha, M.; Nagano, Y.; Kaweewan, I.; Hemmi, H.; Oyoshi, T.; Kodani, S. Heterologous production of coryneazolicin in Escherichia coli. J. Antibiot. 2019, 72, 800–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bailly, C. The bacterial thiopeptide thiostrepton. An update of its mode of action, pharmacological properties and applications. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2022, 914, 174661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Borissenko, L.; Groll, M. 20S proteasome and its inhibitors: Crystallographic knowledge for drug development. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 687–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cociancich, S.; Pesic, A.; Petras, D.; Uhlmann, S.; Kretz, J.; Schubert, V.; Vieweg, L.; Duplan, S.; Marguerettaz, M.; Noëll, J.; et al. The gyrase inhibitor albicidin consists of p-aminobenzoic acids and cyanoalanine. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tajbakhsh, M.; Karimi, A.; Fallah, F.; Akhavan, M.M. Overview of ribosomal and non-ribosomal antimicrobial peptides produced by Gram positive bacteria. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2017, 63, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bhatt, K.; Machado, H.; Osório, N.S.; Sousa, J.; Cardoso, F.; Magalhães, C.; Chen, B.; Chen, M.; Kim, J.; Singh, A.; et al. A Nonribosomal Peptide Synthase Gene Driving Virulence in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. mSphere 2018, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Claus, S.P. The kiss of death: Limosilactobacillus reuteri PKS drives intraspecies competition. Cell Host Microbe 2022, 30, 757–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bushin, L.B.; Clark, K.A.; Pelczer, I.; Seyedsayamdost, M.R. Charting an Unexplored Streptococcal Biosynthetic Landscape Reveals a Unique Peptide Cyclization Motif. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 17674–17684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Schramma, K.R.; Bushin, L.B.; Seyedsayamdost, M.R. Structure and biosynthesis of a macrocyclic peptide containing an unprecedented lysine-to-tryptophan crosslink. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rued, B.E.; Covington, B.C.; Bushin, L.B.; Szewczyk, G.; Laczkovich, I.; Seyedsayamdost, M.R.; Federle, M.J. Quorum Sensing in Streptococcus mutans Regulates Production of Tryglysin, a Novel RaS-RiPP Antimicrobial Compound. mBio 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mukherjee, S.; Biju, A.T. Recent Advances in the Organocatalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Functionalized β-Lactones. Chem. Asian J. 2018, 13, 2333–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Robinson, S.L.; Christenson, J.K.; Wackett, L.P. Biosynthesis and chemical diversity of β-lactone natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2019, 36, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Raushel, F.M. The Discovery of a β-Lactone Synthetase. Biochemistry 2017, 56, 1175–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tang, X.-X.; Yan, X.; Fu, W.-H.; Yi, L.-Q.; Tang, B.-W.; Yu, L.-B.; Fang, M.-J.; Wu, Z.; Qiu, Y.-K. New β-Lactone with Tea Pathogenic Fungus Inhibitory Effect from Marine-Derived Fungus MCCC3A00957. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 2877–2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Malhotra, S.; Hayes, D.; Wozniak, D.J. Cystic Fibrosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: The Host-Microbe Interface. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Létoffé, S.; Wu, Y.; Darch, S.E.; Beloin, C.; Whiteley, M.; Touqui, L.; Ghigo, J.-M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Production of Hydrogen Cyanide Leads to Airborne Control of Staphylococcus aureus Growth in Biofilm and In Vivo Lung Environments. mBio 2022, 13, e0215422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jean-Pierre, V.; Boudet, A.; Sorlin, P.; Menetrey, Q.; Chiron, R.; Lavigne, J.-P.; Marchandin, H. Biofilm Formation by Staphylococcus aureus in the Specific Context of Cystic Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lenney, W.; Gilchrist, F.J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and cyanide production. Eur. Respir. J. 2011, 37, 482–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Anand, A.; Falquet, L.; Abou-Mansour, E.; L’Haridon, F.; Keel, C.; Weisskopf, L. Biological hydrogen cyanide emission globally impacts the physiology of both HCN-emitting and HCN-perceiving Pseudomonas. mBio 2023, 14, e0085723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mangwani, N.; Dash, H.R.; Chauhan, A.; Das, S. Bacterial quorum sensing: Functional features and potential applications in biotechnology. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 22, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mukherjee, S.; Bassler, B.L. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Azimi, S.; Klementiev, A.D.; Whiteley, M.; Diggle, S.P. Bacterial Quorum Sensing During Infection. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 74, 201–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Parsek, M.R.; Greenberg, E.P. Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing in gram-negative bacteria: A signaling mechanism involved in associations with higher organisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 8789–8793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Qin, X.; Thota, G.K.; Singh, R.; Balamurugan, R.; Goycoolea, F.M. Synthetic homoserine lactone analogues as antagonists of bacterial quorum sensing. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 98, 103698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fuqua, C.; Greenberg, E.P. Listening in on bacteria: Acyl-homoserine lactone signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ji, G.; Pei, W.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, R.; Lin, J.; Benito, Y.; Lina, G.; Novick, R.P. Staphylococcus intermedius produces a functional agr autoinducing peptide containing a cyclic lactone. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 3139–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Roongsawang, N.; Washio, K.; Morikawa, M. Diversity of nonribosomal peptide synthetases involved in the biosynthesis of lipopeptide biosurfactants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 12, 141–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Antonioli Júnior, R.; Poloni, J.d.F.; Pinto, É.S.M.; Dorn, M. Interdisciplinary Overview of Lipopeptide and Protein-Containing Biosurfactants. Genes 2022, 14, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Morey, J.R.; Kehl-Fie, T.E. Bioinformatic Mapping of Opine-Like Zincophore Biosynthesis in Bacteria. mSystems 2020, 5, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Marchetti, M.; De Bei, O.; Bettati, S.; Campanini, B.; Kovachka, S.; Gianquinto, E.; Spyrakis, F.; Ronda, L. Iron Metabolism at the Interface between Host and Pathogen: From Nutritional Immunity to Antibacterial Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Nairz, M.; Weiss, G. Iron in infection and immunity. Mol. Aspects Med. 2020, 75, 100864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Reitz, Z.L.; Medema, M.H. Genome mining strategies for metallophore discovery. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 77, 102757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kraemer, S.M.; Duckworth, O.W.; Harrington, J.M.; Schenkeveld, W.D.C. Metallophores and Trace Metal Biogeochemistry. Aquat Geochem 2015, 21, 159–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kenney, G.E.; Rosenzweig, A.C. Chalkophores. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2018, 87, 645–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, W.; Qiu, Z.; Tan, H.; Cao, L. Siderophore production by actinobacteria. Biometals 2014, 27, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Hossain, S.; Morey, J.R.; Neville, S.L.; Ganio, K.; Radin, J.N.; Norambuena, J.; Boyd, J.M.; McDevitt, C.A.; Kehl-Fie, T.E. Host subversion of bacterial metallophore usage drives copper intoxication. mBio 2023, 14, e0135023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Uranga, C.C.; Arroyo, P.; Duggan, B.M.; Gerwick, W.H.; Edlund, A. Commensal Oral Rothia mucilaginosa Produces Enterobactin, a Metal-Chelating Siderophore. mSystems 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hwang, C.H.; Kim, W.J.; Jwa, H.Y.; Song, S.H. Community-acquired Achromobacter xylosoxidans infection presenting as a cavitary lung disease in an immunocompetent patient. Yeungnam Univ. J. Med. 2020, 37, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Menetrey, Q.; Sorlin, P.; Jumas-Bilak, E.; Chiron, R.; Dupont, C.; Marchandin, H. Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: Emerging Pathogens Well-Armed for Life in the Cystic Fibrosis Patients’ Lung. Genes 2021, 12, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wienhold, S.-M.; Brack, M.C.; Nouailles, G.; Krishnamoorthy, G.; Korf, I.H.E.; Seitz, C.; Wienecke, S.; Dietert, K.; Gurtner, C.; Kershaw, O.; et al. Preclinical Assessment of Bacteriophage Therapy against Experimental Acinetobacter baumannii Lung Infection. Viruses 2021, 14, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Cameron, S.J.S.; Lewis, K.E.; Huws, S.A.; Hegarty, M.J.; Lewis, P.D.; Pachebat, J.A.; Mur, L.A.J. A pilot study using metagenomic sequencing of the sputum microbiome suggests potential bacterial biomarkers for lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Toyoshima, M.; Chida, K.; Suda, T. Fulminant community-acquired pneumonia probably caused by Acinetobacter lwoffii. Respirology 2010, 15, 867–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Tabarsi, P.; Yousefi, S.; Jabbehdari, S.; Marjani, M.; Baghaei, P. Pulmonary Actinomycosis in a Patient with AIDS/HCV. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, OD15–OD17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hussenet, C.; LeGoff, J.; Lorillon, G.; Simon, F.; Bergeron, A. Actinomyces naeslundii lung infection diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction coupled with electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2014, 11, 1163–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Supriya, B.G.; Harisree, S.; Savio, J.; Ramachandran, P. Actinomyces naeslundii causing pulmonary endobronchial Actinomycosis—A case report. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol. 2019, 62, 326–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Suzuki, J.B.; Delisle, A.L. Pulmonary actinomycosis of periodontal origin. J. Periodontol. 1984, 55, 581–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Al-Nafeesah, A. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans pneumonia mimicking lung cancer in a previously healthy 12-year-old child from Saudi Arabia: A case report. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2020, 36, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Matzumura-Kuan, M.; Jennings, J. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans infection mimicking lung cancer: A case report. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 46, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sumer, J.; Haller, S.; Sawatzki, M.; Kellner, J.; Boggian, K. An unusual case of multiple hepatic and pulmonary abscesses caused by Aggregatibacter aphrophilus in a young man: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2021, 15, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Dworniczek, E.; Mordarska, H.; Bizuniak, I.; Smogór, W.; Szklarz, E. Beztlenowe pałeczki Propionibacterium w infekcjach oportunistycznych. Med. Dosw. Mikrobiol. 1993, 45, 219–222. [Google Scholar]
  134. Brock, D.W.; Georg, L.K.; Brown, J.M.; Hicklin, M.D. Actinomycosis caused by Arachnia propionica: Report of 11 cases. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1973, 59, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Chakrabarty, K.; Wu, W.; Booth, J.L.; Duggan, E.S.; Nagle, N.N.; Coggeshall, K.M.; Metcalf, J.P. Human lung innate immune response to Bacillus anthracis spore infection. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 3729–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Young, G.A.; Zelle, M.R.; Lincoln, R.E. Respiratory pathogenicity of Bacillus anthracis spores; methods of study and observations on pathogenesis. J. Infect. Dis. 1946, 79, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lee, H.K.; Walls, G.; Anderson, G.; Sullivan, C.; Wong, C.A. Prolonged Bacteroides pyogenes infection in a patient with multiple lung abscesses. Respirol. Case Rep. 2024, 12, e01314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ganeshalingham, A.; Anderson, B.J.; Zuccollo, J.; Davies-Payne, D.; Beca, J. Porcelain lung: Calcification in severe Bordetella pertussis infection. Arch. Dis. Child. 2016, 101, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mihara, Y.; Yoshino, S.; Nakatani, K.; Nishimura, T.; Kan, H.; Yamamura, Y.; Tanaka, E.; Ishii, S.; Shimonodan, H.; Okada, K.; et al. Bordetella pertussis is a common pathogen in infants hospitalized for acute lower respiratory tract infection during the winter season. J. Infect. Chemother. 2021, 27, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ferreira, A.C.M.; Marson, F.A.L.; Cohen, M.A.; Bertuzzo, C.S.; Levy, C.E.; Ribeiro, A.F.; Ribeiro, J.D. Hypertonic Saline as a Useful Tool for Sputum Induction and Pathogen Detection in Cystic Fibrosis. Lung 2017, 195, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Delsing, C.E.; Ruesen, C.; Boeree, M.J.; van Damme, P.A.; Kuipers, S.; van Crevel, R. An African woman with pulmonary cavities: TB or not TB? Neth. J. Med. 2014, 72, 426–428. [Google Scholar]
  142. Morgan, M.A.; Goldstein, E.J. Bulleidia extructa: An underappreciated anaerobic pathogen. Anaerobe 2021, 69, 102339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Husain, S.; Singh, N. Burkholderia cepacia infection and lung transplantation. Semin. Respir. Infect. 2002, 17, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Mohapatra, P.R.; Shirgaonkar, R.B.; Behera, B.; Girija, A. Community-Acquired burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) pneumonia in a lung cancer patient on erlotinib. Lung India 2023, 40, 364–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Miller, W.G.; Yee, E. Complete Genome Sequence of Campylobacter gracilis ATCC 33236T. Genome Announc. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ehrmann, E.; Jolivet-Gougeon, A.; Bonnaure-Mallet, M.; Fosse, T. Multidrug-resistant oral Capnocytophaga gingivalis responsible for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Case report and literature review. Anaerobe 2016, 42, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Fukuoka, K.; Mochizuki, Y.; Nakahara, Y.; Kawamura, T.; Watanabe, S.; Sasaki, S. A case report of lung abscess caused by Capnocytophaga gingivalis infection. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 2000, 74, 594–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. van der Gast, C.J.; Walker, A.W.; Stressmann, F.A.; Rogers, G.B.; Scott, P.; Daniels, T.W.; Carroll, M.P.; Parkhill, J.; Bruce, K.D. Partitioning core and satellite taxa from within cystic fibrosis lung bacterial communities. ISME J. 2011, 5, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Cuthbertson, L.; Rogers, G.B.; Walker, A.W.; Oliver, A.; Hoffman, L.R.; Carroll, M.P.; Parkhill, J.; Bruce, K.D.; van der Gast, C.J. Implications of multiple freeze-thawing on respiratory samples for culture-independent analyses. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2015, 14, 464–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bonatti, H.; Rossboth, D.W.; Nachbaur, D.; Fille, M.; Aspöck, C.; Hend, I.; Hourmont, K.; White, L.; Malnick, H.; Allerberger, F.J. A series of infections due to Capnocytophaga spp in immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2003, 9, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Premachandra, N.M.; Jayaweera, J.A.A.S. Chlamydia pneumoniae infections and development of lung cancer: Systematic review. Infect. Agent. Cancer 2022, 17, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Coenye, T.; Goris, J.; Spilker, T.; Vandamme, P.; LiPuma, J.J. Characterization of unusual bacteria isolated from respiratory secretions of cystic fibrosis patients and description of Inquilinus limosus gen. nov., sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 2062–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Yuan, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Guo, W.; Cheng, H.; Cao, Q. A Preliminary Study on Microbiota Characteristics of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Pulmonary Nodules Based on Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Minkin, R.; Shapiro, J.M. Corynebacterium afermentans lung abscess and empyema in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection. South. Med. J. 2004, 97, 395–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Kebbe, J.; Mador, M.J. Corynebacterium macginleyi: A cause of ventilator associated pneumonia in an immunocompromised patient. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2015, 16, 154–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Michel, C.; Raimo, M.; Lazarevic, V.; Gaïa, N.; Leduc, N.; Knoop, C.; Hallin, M.; Vandenberg, O.; Schrenzel, J.; Grimaldi, D.; et al. Case Report: About a Case of Hyperammonemia Syndrome Following Lung Transplantation: Could Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Improve the Clinical Management? Front. Med. 2021, 8, 684040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. van Roeden, S.E.; Thijsen, S.F.; Sankatsing, S.U.C.; Limonard, G.J.M. Clinical relevance of Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum in lower respiratory tract specimens. Infect. Dis. 2015, 47, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Severo, C.B.; Guazzelli, L.S.; Barra, M.B.; Hochhegger, B.; Severo, L.C. Multiple pulmonary nodules caused by Corynebacterium striatum in an immunocompetent patient. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2014, 56, 89–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bowstead, T.T.; Santiago, S.M. Pleuropulmonary infection due to Corynebacterium striatum. Br. J. Dis. Chest 1980, 74, 198–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ekanayake, A.; Madegedara, D.; Chandrasekharan, V.; Magana-Arachchi, D. Respiratory Bacterial Microbiota and Individual Bacterial Variability in Lung Cancer and Bronchiectasis Patients. Indian J. Microbiol. 2020, 60, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yildiz, H.; Sünnetçioğlu, A.; Ekin, S.; Baran, A.İ.; Özgökçe, M.; Aşker, S.; Üney, İ.; Turgut, E.; Akyüz, S. Delftia acidovorans pneumonia with lung cavities formation. Colomb. Med. 2019, 50, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bittar, F.; Richet, H.; Dubus, J.-C.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; Stremler, N.; Sarles, J.; Raoult, D.; Rolain, J.-M. Molecular detection of multiple emerging pathogens in sputa from cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Cawcutt, K.A.; Bhatti, M.M.; Nelson, D.R. Pleural fluid infection caused by Dietzia cinnamea. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2016, 85, 496–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Duport, P.; Miltgen, G.; Kebbabi, C.; Belmonte, O.; Coolen-Allou, N.; Allyn, J.; Allou, N. First case of pleural empyema and pulmonary abscess caused by Eggerthia catenaformis. Anaerobe 2018, 50, 9–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kentos, A.; Vuyst, P.d.; Stuelens, M.J.; Jacobs, F.; Francquen, P.d.; Delaere, B.; Demaeyer, P.; Thys, J.P. Lung abscess due to Eikenella corrodens: Three cases and review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1995, 14, 146–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Jiménez-Castillo, R.A.; Aguilar-Rivera, L.R.; Carrizales-Sepúlveda, E.F.; Gómez-Quiroz, R.A.; Llantada-López, A.R.; González-Aguirre, J.E.; Náñez-Terreros, H.; Rendón-Ramírez, E.J. A case of round pneumonia due to Enterobacter hormaechei: The need for a standardized diagnosis and treatment approach in adults. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2021, 63, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chen, Q.; Liu, M.; Guo, H.; Wang, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Li, J.; Li, P.; Yang, L.; et al. Altered Respiratory Microbiomes, Plasma Metabolites, and Immune Responses in Influenza A Virus and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Coinfection. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0524722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Mendes, A.R.; Costa, A.; Ferreira, H.; Ferreira, C. Enterococcus faecalis-associated lung abscess in a male adolescent—A case report. BMC Pediatr. 2020, 20, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Zheng, L.; Sun, R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; She, X.; Jian, X.; Yu, F.; Deng, X.; Sai, B.; Wang, L.; et al. Lung microbiome alterations in NSCLC patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. George, W.L.; Kirby, B.D.; Sutter, V.L.; Citron, D.M.; Finegold, S.M. Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli: Their role in infection and patterns of susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. II. Little-known Fusobacterium species and miscellaneous genera. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1981, 3, 599–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Sonti, R.; Fleury, C. Fusobacterium necrophorum presenting as isolated lung nodules. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2015, 15, 80–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Song, M.J.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Kang, N.; Jhun, B.W. Comparison of the sputum microbiome between patients with stable nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease and patients requiring treatment. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Da Costa, C.T.; Porter, C.; Parry, K.; Morris, A.; Quoraishi, A.H. Empyema thoracis and lung abscess due to Gemella morbillorum. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1996, 15, 75–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Harris, J.K.; Groote, M.A.d.; Sagel, S.D.; Zemanick, E.T.; Kapsner, R.; Penvari, C.; Kaess, H.; Deterding, R.R.; Accurso, F.J.; Pace, N.R. Molecular identification of bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with cystic fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20529–20533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Shirazi, M.S.R.; Al-Alo, K.Z.K.; Al-Yasiri, M.H.; Lateef, Z.M.; Ghasemian, A. Microbiome Dysbiosis and Predominant Bacterial Species as Human Cancer Biomarkers. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2020, 51, 725–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Yang, S.; Wu, L.; Xu, L.; Huang, X.; Sun, X.; Yang, L.; Xu, L. Lung abscess secondary to lung cancer with a coinfection of Granulicatellaadiacens and other bacteria: A case report. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Reissig, A.; Mempel, C.; Schumacher, U.; Copetti, R.; Gross, F.; Aliberti, S. Microbiological diagnosis and antibiotic therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia and acute COPD exacerbation in daily clinical practice: Comparison to current guidelines. Lung 2013, 191, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Moghaddam, S.J.; Ochoa, C.E.; Sethi, S.; Dickey, B.F. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2011, 6, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. García-Fojeda, B.; González-Carnicero, Z.; Lorenzo, A.d.; Minutti, C.M.; Tapia, L.d.; Euba, B.; Iglesias-Ceacero, A.; Castillo-Lluva, S.; Garmendia, J.; Casals, C. Lung Surfactant Lipids Provide Immune Protection Against Haemophilus influenzae Respiratory Infection. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Chatziparasidis, G.; Kantar, A.; Grimwood, K. Pathogenesis of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae infections in chronic suppurative lung disease. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2023, 58, 1849–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Hong, B.-Y.; Paulson, J.N.; Stine, O.C.; Weinstock, G.M.; Cervantes, J.L. Meta-analysis of the lung microbiota in pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 2018, 109, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Boucher, M.B.; Bedotto, M.; Couderc, C.; Gomez, C.; Reynaud-Gaubert, M.; Drancourt, M. Haemophilus pittmaniae respiratory infection in a patient with siderosis: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2012, 6, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Bachman, M.A.; Breen, P.; Deornellas, V.; Mu, Q.; Zhao, L.; Wu, W.; Cavalcoli, J.D.; Mobley, H.L.T. Genome-Wide Identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae Fitness Genes during Lung Infection. mBio 2015, 6, e00775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Rangasamy, T.; Ghimire, L.; Jin, L.; Le, J.; Periasamy, S.; Paudel, S.; Cai, S.; Jeyaseelan, S. Host Defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae Pneumonia Is Augmented by Lung-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. J. Immunol. 2021, 207, 1112–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Morgenstein, A.A.; Citron, D.M.; Orisek, B.; Finegold, S.M. Serious infection with Leptotrichia buccalis. Report of a case and review of the literature. Am. J. Med. 1980, 69, 782–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Eribe, E.R.K.; Olsen, I. Leptotrichia species in human infections II. J. Oral Microbiol. 2017, 9, 1368848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Anezaki, H.; Terada, N.; Kawamura, T.; Kurai, H. Moraxella catarrhalis bacteremic pneumonia. IDCases 2020, 19, e00712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Versi, A.; Ivan, F.X.; Abdel-Aziz, M.I.; Bates, S.; Riley, J.; Baribaud, F.; Kermani, N.Z.; Montuschi, P.; Dahlen, S.-E.; Djukanovic, R.; et al. Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis in sputum of severe asthma with inflammasome and neutrophil activation. Allergy 2023, 78, 2906–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Davis, J.M.; Whipp, M.J.; Ashhurst-Smith, C.; DeBoer, J.C.; Peel, M.M. Mucoid nitrate-negative Moraxella nonliquefaciens from three patients with chronic lung disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3888–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Rosett, W.; Heck, D.M.; Hodges, G.R. Pneumonitis and pulmonary abscess associated with Moraxella nonliquefaciens. Chest 1976, 70, 664–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Vuori-Holopainen, E.; Salo, E.; Saxen, H.; Vaara, M.; Tarkka, E.; Peltola, H. Clinical “pneumococcal pneumonia” due to Moraxella osloensis: Case report and a review. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 33, 625–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Silva, C.A.M.; Danelishvili, L.; McNamara, M.; Berredo-Pinho, M.; Bildfell, R.; Biet, F.; Rodrigues, L.S.; Oliveira, A.V.; Bermudez, L.E.; Pessolani, M.C.V. Interaction of Mycobacterium leprae with human airway epithelial cells: Adherence, entry, survival, and identification of potential adhesins by surface proteome analysis. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 2645–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Rees, R.J.; McDougall, A.C. Airborne infection with Mycobacterium leprae in mice. J. Med. Microbiol. 1977, 10, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Fu, M.; Cao, L.-J.; Xia, H.-L.; Ji, Z.-M.; Hu, N.-N.; Leng, Z.-J.; Xie, W.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, J.-Q.; Xia, D.-Q. The performance of detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in lung biopsy tissue by metagenomic next-generation sequencing. BMC Pulm. Med. 2022, 22, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Lyon, G.M.; Alspaugh, J.A.; Meredith, F.T.; Harrell, L.J.; Tapson, V.; Davis, R.D.; Kanj, S.S. Mycoplasma hominis pneumonia complicating bilateral lung transplantation: Case report and review of the literature. Chest 1997, 112, 1428–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Moneke, I.; Hornuss, D.; Serr, A.; Kern, W.V.; Passlick, B.; Senbaklavaci, O. Lung Abscess and Recurrent Empyema After Infection With Mycoplasma hominis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofab406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Chaudhry, R.; Ghosh, A.; Chandolia, A. Pathogenesis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae: An update. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 34, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Waites, K.B.; Talkington, D.F. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 697–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Kovaleva, V.V.; Andreeva, Z.M.; Fedoseeva, V.N.; Chitaeva, V.G. Vydelenie i identifikatsiia neĭsseriĭ pri bronkhial’noĭ astme. Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 1975, 8, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  200. Kamar, N.; Chabbert, V.; Ribes, D.; Chabanon, G.; Faguer, S.; Mari, A.; Guitard, J.; Durand, D.; Rostaing, L. Neisseria-cinerea-induced pulmonary cavitation in a renal transplant patient. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 2007, 22, 2099–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Moriya, T.; Ohsumi, A.; Tanizawa, K.; Matsumura, Y.; Date, H. Infected lung bulla caused by Neisseria elongata: A case report. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2022, 40, 101758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Zavascki, A.P.; Fritscher, L.; Superti, S.; Dias, C.; Kroth, L.; Traesel, M.A.; Antonello, I.C.F.; Saitovitch, D. First case report of Neisseria lactamica causing cavitary lung disease in an adult organ transplant recipient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 2666–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Changal, K.H.; Raina, A.; Altaf, S.S. Neisseria lactamica Causing a Lung Cavity and Skin Rash in a Renal Transplant Patient: First Report from India. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2016, 2016, 1932963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Jang, H.J.; Choi, J.Y.; Kim, K.; Yong, S.H.; Kim, Y.W.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, E.Y.; Jung, J.Y.; Kang, Y.A.; Park, M.S.; et al. Relationship of the lung microbiome with PD-L1 expression and immunotherapy response in lung cancer. Respir. Res. 2021, 22, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Ying, K.L.; Brasky, T.M.; Freudenheim, J.L.; McElroy, J.P.; Nickerson, Q.A.; Song, M.-A.; Weng, D.Y.; Wewers, M.D.; Whiteman, N.B.; Mathe, E.A.; et al. Saliva and Lung Microbiome Associations with Electronic Cigarette Use and Smoking. Cancer Prev. Res. 2022, 15, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Diao, W.; Shen, N.; Du, Y.; Erb-Downward, J.R.; Sun, X.; Guo, C.; Ke, Q.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Gyetko, M.R.; He, B. Symptom-related sputum microbiota in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2018, 13, 2289–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Carvalho Baptista, I.M.d.; Martinho, F.C.; Nascimento, G.G.; Da Rocha Santos, C.E.; Prado, R.F.d.; Valera, M.C. Colonization of oropharynx and lower respiratory tract in critical patients: Risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 85, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Rutebemberwa, A.; Stevens, M.J.; Perez, M.J.; Smith, L.P.; Sanders, L.; Cosgrove, G.; Robertson, C.E.; Tuder, R.M.; Harris, J.K. Novosphingobium and its potential role in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases: Insights from microbiome studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Yan, Y.; Li, H.; Li, S.; Liu, S.; Jia, N.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Q.; Li, J.; Han, C. Olsenella uli-induced pneumonia: A case report. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2022, 21, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. van Charante, F.; Wieme, A.; Rigole, P.; Canck, E.d.; Ostyn, L.; Grassi, L.; Deforce, D.; Crabbé, A.; Vandamme, P.; Joossens, M.; et al. Microbial diversity and antimicrobial susceptibility in endotracheal tube biofilms recovered from mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. Biofilm 2022, 4, 100079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Gawron-Gzella, A.; Michalak, A.; Kędzia, A. Antimicrobial activity of preparation Bioaron C. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2014, 71, 795–802. [Google Scholar]
  212. Miyatake, H.; Takagi, K.; Yamaki, K.; Gonda, H.; Watanabe, H.; Satake, T.; Suzuki, R.; Mizuno, K.; Aihara, H.; Hara, M. A clinical study on ceftazidime in the treatment of intractable respiratory infections. Jpn. J. Antibiot. 1990, 43, 1164–1173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  213. Guilloux, C.-A.; Lamoureux, C.; Beauruelle, C.; Héry-Arnaud, G. Porphyromonas: A neglected potential key genus in human microbiomes. Anaerobe 2021, 68, 102230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Brook, I. Role of encapsulated Bacteroides sp. in upper respiratory tract infection. Méd. Mal. Infect. 1990, 20, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Marcos Sánchez, F.; Albo Castaño, I.; Arbol Linde, F.; Celdrán Gil, J. Abscesos pulmonares por Prevotella oralis y Prevotella ruminicola en paciente VIH. An. Med. Interna 2003, 20, 164–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Onorati, I.; Guiraudet, P.; Billard-Pomares, T.; Martinod, E. A recurrent lung abscess caused by delayed diagnosis of unique co-infection with Abiotrophia defectiva. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2020, 31, 909–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Palmer, G.M.; Abdel Aziz, K.K.; Amir, A.; Waseem, S. Complicated Management of Left-Sided Loculated Empyema Secondary to Streptococcus intermedius and Prevotella in a 53-Year-Old Male. Cureus 2023, 15, e47443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Cobo, F.; Calatrava, E.; Rodríguez-Granger, J.; Sampedro, A.; Aliaga-Martínez, L.; Navarro-Marí, J.M. A rare case of pleural effusion due to Prevotella dentalis. Anaerobe 2018, 54, 144–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Arneitz, C.; Windhaber, J.; Castellani, C.; Kienesberger, B.; Klymiuk, I.; Fasching, G.; Till, H.; Singer, G. Cardiorespiratory performance capacity and airway microbiome in patients following primary repair of esophageal atresia. Pediatr. Res. 2021, 90, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Sun, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Tan, Y.; An, T.; Zhuo, M.; Pan, Z.; Ma, M.; Jia, B.; Zhang, H.; et al. Characterization of Lung and Oral Microbiomes in Lung Cancer Patients Using Culturomics and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0031423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Asif, A.A.; Roy, M.; Ahmad, S. Rare case of Prevotella pleuritidis lung abscess. BMJ Case Rep. 2020, 13, e235960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Sakamoto, M.; Ohkusu, K.; Masaki, T.; Kako, H.; Ezaki, T.; Benno, Y. Prevotella pleuritidis sp. nov., isolated from pleural fluid. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 1725–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Kiral, E.; Oztunali, C.; Bozan, G.; Kilic, O.; Dinleyici, E.C. Severe Course of Lung Abscess due to Multidrug Resistant Proteus mirabilis and Escherichia coli. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2023, 42, e495–e497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Ullah, S.; Saadaat, R.; Hamidi, H.; Haidary, A.M. Proteus mirabilis: A rare cause of pneumonia, radiologically mimicking malignancy of the lung. Clin. Case Rep. 2023, 11, e7937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Ishii, H.; Kushima, H.; Koide, Y.; Kinoshita, Y. Pseudomonas fluorescens pneumonia. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2024, 140, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Liu, X.; Xiang, L.; Yin, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, D.; Qu, Y. Pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas fluorescens: A case report. BMC Pulm. Med. 2021, 21, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Higuchi, R.; Goto, T.; Hirotsu, Y.; Otake, S.; Oyama, T.; Amemiya, K.; Mochizuki, H.; Omata, M. Streptococcus australis and Ralstonia pickettii as Major Microbiota in Mesotheliomas. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Pan, W.; Zhao, Z.; Dong, M. Lobar pneumonia caused by Ralstonia pickettii in a sixty-five-year-old Han Chinese man: A case report. J. Med. Case Rep. 2011, 5, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Hiyamuta, H.; Tsuruta, N.; Matsuyama, T.; Satake, M.; Ohkusu, K.; Higuchi, K. First case report of respiratory infection with Rothia aeria. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 2010, 48, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  230. Sonehara, K.; Araki, T.; Hanaoka, M. Rothia aeria pneumonia in an immunocompetent patient: A novel case study. Respirol. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e0843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Schiff, M.J.; Kaplan, M.H. Rothia dentocariosa pneumonia in an immunocompromised patient. Lung 1987, 165, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Wallet, F.; Perez, T.; Roussel-Delvallez, M.; Wallaert, B.; Courcol, R. Rothia dentocariosa: Two new cases of pneumonia revealing lung cancer. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 29, 419–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Rigauts, C.; Aizawa, J.; Taylor, S.L.; Rogers, G.B.; Govaerts, M.; Cos, P.; Ostyn, L.; Sims, S.; Vandeplassche, E.; Sze, M.; et al. Rothia mucilaginosa is an anti-inflammatory bacterium in the respiratory tract of patients with chronic lung disease. Eur. Respir. J. 2022, 59, 2101293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Yang, L.; Liu, T.; Liu, B.-C.; Liu, C.-T. Severe Pneumonia Advanced to Lung Abscess and Empyema Due to Rothia Mucilaginosa in an Immunocompetent Patient. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2020, 359, 54–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Elston, H.R.; Magnuson, C.W. Lung abscess caused by nonchromogenic Serratia marcescens. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1965, 92, 624–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Goldstein, J.D.; Godleski, J.J.; Balikian, J.P.; Herman, P.G. Pathologic patterns of Serratia marcescens pneumonia. Hum. Pathol. 1982, 13, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Roingeard, C.; Jaubert, J.; Guilleminault, L. A large and unusual lung abscess with positive culture to Slackia exigua. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 40, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Chaudhary, D.; Aggarwal, T.; Pannu, A.K. Staphylococcus aureus pyomyositis and septic lung emboli. CMAJ 2022, 194, E126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Goerke, C.; Wolz, C. Adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to the cystic fibrosis lung. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 300, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Regard, L.; Martin, C.; Teillaud, J.-L.; Lafoeste, H.; Vicaire, H.; Ladjemi, M.Z.; Ollame-Omvane, E.; Sibéril, S.; Burgel, P.-R. Effective control of Staphylococcus aureus lung infection despite tertiary lymphoid structure disorganisation. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 57, 2000768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Dong, Y.; Glaser, K.; Schlegel, N.; Claus, H.; Speer, C.P. An underestimated pathogen: Staphylococcus epidermidis induces pro-inflammatory responses in human alveolar epithelial cells. Cytokine 2019, 123, 154761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhao, X.; Sun, Y. Characteristics of pathogenic microbes in lung microenvironment of lung cancer patients without respiratory infection. J. BUON 2021, 26, 1862–1870. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  243. Chou, D.-W.; Lee, C.-T. Primary lung abscess caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis. J. Infect. Chemother. 2017, 23, 791–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Mbaebie, N.C.; Alarcon Velasco, S.V.; Touhey, J. Common variable immunodeficiency presenting in a man with recurrent pneumonia caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis. BMJ Case Rep. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Obase, Y.; Higashiyama, Y.; Shimafuji, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Nakayama, H.; Mori, N.; Ishino, T.; Hirakata, Y.; Tomono, K.; Kohno, S. Case report: Lung abscess caused by Streptococcus agalactiae. Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1997, 71, 1085–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Noguchi, S.; Yatera, K.; Kawanami, T.; Yamasaki, K.; Naito, K.; Akata, K.; Shimabukuro, I.; Ishimoto, H.; Yoshii, C.; Mukae, H. The clinical features of respiratory infections caused by the Streptococcus anginosus group. BMC Pulm. Med. 2015, 15, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Huang, Y.J.; Kim, E.; Cox, M.J.; Brodie, E.L.; Brown, R.; Wiener-Kronish, J.P.; Lynch, S.V. A persistent and diverse airway microbiota present during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. OMICS 2010, 14, 9–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Farooq, H.; Mohammad, T.; Farooq, A.; Mohammad, Q. Streptococcus gordonii Empyema: A Rare Presentation of Streptococcus gordonii Infection. Cureus 2019, 11, e4611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Manasrah, N.; Nanja Reddy, S.; Al Sbihi, A.; Hafeez, W. Streptococcus intermedius: Unusual presentation and complication of lung abscess. BMJ Case Rep. 2021, 14, e245675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Saleem, S.; Nelson, T.B. Streptococcus intermedius lung infection masquerading as malignancy. Clin. Case Rep. 2023, 11, e8018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Inchaustegui, C.A.; Wang, K.Y.; Teniola, O.; de Rosen, V.L. Large septic pulmonary embolus complicating streptococcus mutans pulmonary valve endocarditis. J. Radiol. Case Rep. 2018, 12, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Nishioka, K.; Kyo, M.; Nakaya, T.; Shime, N. Proteins produced by Streptococcus species in the lower respiratory tract can modify antiviral responses against influenza virus in respiratory epithelial cells. Microbes Infect. 2021, 23, 104764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  253. Marquart, M.E. Pathogenicity and virulence of Streptococcus pneumoniae: Cutting to the chase on proteases. Virulence 2021, 12, 766–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Iqbal, A.; Muhammad Haroon, D.; Badar, S.; Kaur, L.; Waqas, M.; Haider, F.; Syed, M.; Djekidel, K. Streptococcus pyogenes Pneumonia: A Rare and Severe Presentation in a Patient With Asthma. Cureus 2023, 15, e47182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Lamoureux, C.; Guilloux, C.-A.; Beauruelle, C.; Gouriou, S.; Ramel, S.; Dirou, A.; Le Bihan, J.; Revert, K.; Ropars, T.; Lagrafeuille, R.; et al. An observational study of anaerobic bacteria in cystic fibrosis lung using culture dependant and independent approaches. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Bosio, C.M.; Goodyear, A.W.; Dow, S.W. Early interaction of Yersinia pestis with APCs in the lung. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 6750–6756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  257. Laws, T.R.; Davey, M.S.; Titball, R.W.; Lukaszewski, R. Neutrophils are important in early control of lung infection by Yersinia pestis. Microbes Infect. 2010, 12, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Bittinger, K.; Charlson, E.S.; Loy, E.; Shirley, D.J.; Haas, A.R.; Laughlin, A.; Yi, Y.; Wu, G.D.; Lewis, J.D.; Frank, I.; et al. Improved characterization of medically relevant fungi in the human respiratory tract using next-generation sequencing. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. van Woerden, H.C.; Gregory, C.; Brown, R.; Marchesi, J.R.; Hoogendoorn, B.; Matthews, I.P. Differences in fungi present in induced sputum samples from asthma patients and non-atopic controls: A community based case control study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Cui, L.; Lucht, L.; Tipton, L.; Rogers, M.B.; Fitch, A.; Kessinger, C.; Camp, D.; Kingsley, L.; Leo, N.; Greenblatt, R.M.; et al. Topographic diversity of the respiratory tract mycobiome and alteration in HIV and lung disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 191, 932–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Willger, S.D.; Grim, S.L.; Dolben, E.L.; Shipunova, A.; Hampton, T.H.; Morrison, H.G.; Filkins, L.M.; O’Toole, G.A.; Moulton, L.A.; Ashare, A.; et al. Characterization and quantification of the fungal microbiome in serial samples from individuals with cystic fibrosis. Microbiome 2014, 2, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The distribution of biosynthetic gene clusters of bacteria in the human lung microbiome. (a) Bar chart showing the number of respective subclasses of gene clusters of all bacteria studied; (b) phylogenetic tree representing the evolutionary relationship of the bacteria in combination with the distribution of biosynthetic pathways for natural products.
Figure 1. The distribution of biosynthetic gene clusters of bacteria in the human lung microbiome. (a) Bar chart showing the number of respective subclasses of gene clusters of all bacteria studied; (b) phylogenetic tree representing the evolutionary relationship of the bacteria in combination with the distribution of biosynthetic pathways for natural products.
Microorganisms 12 01448 g001
Figure 2. The distribution of biosynthetic gene clusters of fungi in the human lung mycobiome. (a) Bar chart showing the number of respective subclasses of gene clusters of all fungi studied; (b) phylogenetic tree representing the relatedness of the fungi in combination with the distribution of gene clusters as higher natural product classes.
Figure 2. The distribution of biosynthetic gene clusters of fungi in the human lung mycobiome. (a) Bar chart showing the number of respective subclasses of gene clusters of all fungi studied; (b) phylogenetic tree representing the relatedness of the fungi in combination with the distribution of gene clusters as higher natural product classes.
Microorganisms 12 01448 g002
Figure 3. Input sequence size plotted against the number of predicted BGCs in bacteria of the human lung microbiome. Each dot corresponds to one bacterial strain of our database. Trendline indicates a positive correlation between the number of BGCs present in a strain and its input sequence size (coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.4886)).
Figure 3. Input sequence size plotted against the number of predicted BGCs in bacteria of the human lung microbiome. Each dot corresponds to one bacterial strain of our database. Trendline indicates a positive correlation between the number of BGCs present in a strain and its input sequence size (coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.4886)).
Microorganisms 12 01448 g003
Figure 4. BiG-SCAPE sequence similarity network (SSN) of the identified biosynthetic gene clusters of all the investigated organisms of the human lung microbiome. The network files used were obtained after BiG-SCAPE analysis with a cutoff value of 0.8 and the mix parameter. Subsequent visualization was performed using Cytoscape. Different colors represent classes of natural products; shapes indicate the domain of life of the organism. Important groups of GCFs that are discussed here are marked with a frame.
Figure 4. BiG-SCAPE sequence similarity network (SSN) of the identified biosynthetic gene clusters of all the investigated organisms of the human lung microbiome. The network files used were obtained after BiG-SCAPE analysis with a cutoff value of 0.8 and the mix parameter. Subsequent visualization was performed using Cytoscape. Different colors represent classes of natural products; shapes indicate the domain of life of the organism. Important groups of GCFs that are discussed here are marked with a frame.
Microorganisms 12 01448 g004
Table 1. Distribution of BGCs in relevant phyla of the lung microbiome.
Table 1. Distribution of BGCs in relevant phyla of the lung microbiome.
KingdomPhylum/DivisionNumber of
Organisms
Number of BGCsBGCs/OrganismAverage Sequence Input Size (Mbp)
BacteriaActinomycetota311013.32.68
Bacillota671942.92.31
Bacteroidota33581.83.17
Chlamydiota1--1.23
Fusobacteriota13231.82.37
Mycoplasmatota200.00.82
Pseudomonadota795376.84.04
Spirochaetota144.02.84
Total2279174.02.43
FungiAscomycota4769314.721.00
Dothideomycetes816620.839.03
Eurotiomycetes733447.732.25
Saccharomycetes26391.512.97
Sordariomycetes31083636.5
Basidomycota452204.938.36
Agaricomycetes291956.742.71
Rozellomycota1---
Total939139.829.68
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Semmler, F.; Regis Belisário-Ferrari, M.; Kulosa, M.; Kaysser, L. The Metabolic Potential of the Human Lung Microbiome. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071448

AMA Style

Semmler F, Regis Belisário-Ferrari M, Kulosa M, Kaysser L. The Metabolic Potential of the Human Lung Microbiome. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7):1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071448

Chicago/Turabian Style

Semmler, Florian, Matheus Regis Belisário-Ferrari, Maria Kulosa, and Leonard Kaysser. 2024. "The Metabolic Potential of the Human Lung Microbiome" Microorganisms 12, no. 7: 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071448

APA Style

Semmler, F., Regis Belisário-Ferrari, M., Kulosa, M., & Kaysser, L. (2024). The Metabolic Potential of the Human Lung Microbiome. Microorganisms, 12(7), 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071448

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop