Next Article in Journal
Changes in Mouse Gut Microbial Community in Response to the Different Types of Commonly Consumed Meat
Next Article in Special Issue
Improved Positive Predictive Performance of Listeria Indicator Broth: A Sensitive Environmental Screening Test to Identify Presumptively Positive Swab Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Response Surface Methodology Optimization of an Acidic Protease Produced by Penicillium bilaiae Isolate TDPEF30, a Newly Recovered Endophytic Fungus from Healthy Roots of Date Palm Trees (Phoenix dactylifera L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modulation of the Immune Response to Improve Health and Reduce Foodborne Pathogens in Poultry
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 7
Issue 3
10.3390/microorganisms7030075
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Establishment of Listeria monocytogenes in the Gastrointestinal Tract

by
Morgan L. Davis
1,
Steven C. Ricke
1 and
Janet R. Donaldson
2,*
1
Center for Food Safety, Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA
2
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2019, 7(3), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7030075
Submission received: 5 February 2019 / Revised: 5 March 2019 / Accepted: 5 March 2019 / Published: 10 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Foodborne Pathogen Distribution, Ecology, Inactivation and Methods of Differentiation)
Versions Notes

Abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram positive foodborne pathogen that can colonize the gastrointestinal tract of a number of hosts, including humans. These environments contain numerous stressors such as bile, low oxygen and acidic pH, which may impact the level of colonization and persistence of this organism within the GI tract. The ability of L. monocytogenes to establish infections and colonize the gastrointestinal tract is directly related to its ability to overcome these stressors, which is mediated by the efficient expression of several stress response mechanisms during its passage. This review will focus upon how and when this occurs and how this impacts the outcome of foodborne disease.

1. Introduction

Foodborne pathogens account for nearly 6.5 to 33 million illnesses and 9000 deaths each year in the United States [1]. There are over 40 pathogens that can cause foodborne disease. The six most common foodborne pathogens are Salmonella, Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Clostridium perfringens. Together, these six pathogens are responsible for $2.9 to 6.7 billion in medical expenses in the United States each year [2]. Of these pathogens, L. monocytogenes possesses one of the highest mortality rates, suggesting a need for the understanding of its pathogenicity [3].
L. monocytogenes is a Gram positive, foodborne pathogen that was first identified in 1924 and later established as the causative agent of listeriosis in 1989 [4,5]. The severity of listeriosis can range from gastroenteritis to meningitis or encephalitis, septicemia or fetal infections [6]. Listeriosis has an approximate 20% mortality rate in the United States, where those most susceptible include the young, elderly, immunocompromised, and pregnant [3,7].
L. monocytogenes is found as a saprophyte in nature yet can tolerate the stressors encountered within the mammalian gastrointestinal tract, and also the food-processing environment [3,7]. According to the 2009 FDA Food Code, the food industry currently uses a combination of modified atmospheric and vacuum packaging, which helps to inhibit the growth of pathogens with a combination of oxygen, carbon dioxide and nitrogen. The inhibition of pathogenic organisms is accomplished by a higher concentration of carbon dioxide than oxygen within packaging after processing [8]. However, L. monocytogenes is able to overcome exposure to variations in oxygen concentrations that occur during processing and packaging of food.
L. monocytogenes can also tolerate the multiple stressors encountered within the gastrointestinal tract. These include bile salts, variations in pH, and available oxygen [9,10,11]. The initial stressor encountered following the consumption of food contaminated with L. monocytogenes is acidic conditions within the stomach, followed by bile within the intestines. Once in the gastrointestinal tract, L. monocytogenes has been shown to invade into the intestinal epithelial cells by the use of internalins A (InlA) and B (InlB) through Peyer’s patches [12,13], intestinal villi [14] and goblet cells [15]. This ability to invade allows L. monocytogenes to disperse through the body through the use of lymphoid cells [13]. After reaching the liver, L. monocytogenes is able to translocate into the gallbladder through bile canaliculi, where it can replicate extracellularly [16,17]. This allows for the recycling and re-entry of L. monocytogenes cells into the gastrointestinal tract through the biliary ducts [17]. Furthermore, L. monocytogenes has the capability of surviving and growing at temperatures ranging from 0.4 °C to 45 °C and pH ranging from 4.0 to 9.6 [18,19].
This review will describe the current literature as it relates to the genetics of L. monocytogenes, the bile induced stress response, and the impact of oxygen availability on survival in the gastrointestinal tract. The first section is a brief description of L. monocytogenes lineages and genomics. Because survival mechanisms and stress responses vary between strains, extensive genomic characterization of different serovars has been done in order to understand pathogenesis. The second section of this review will explore the antimicrobial conditions encountered within the mammalian host, specifically the high concentration of bile salts in the gastrointestinal tract and defense mechanisms that assist in the survival of L. monocytogenes against bile. The final section will focus on oxygen availability as an environmental factor that influences the regulation of stress response genes and virulence factors.

2. Serovars of Listeria monocytogenes

There are four genetic lineages and thirteen serovars of L. monocytogenes [20,21]. The majority of L. monocytogenes isolates are part of the lineages I and II and were first characterized in 1989 [22]. Two additional lineages, III and IV, have subsequently been identified in 1995 and 2008, respectively [23,24]. Lineage I consists of serovars 1/2b, 3b, 3c, and 4b. Lineage II consists of serovars 1/2a, 1/2c, and 3a. Serovars 4a, 4b, and 4c comprise lineages III and IV. Serovars 1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c and 4b make up roughly 90% of human listeriosis cases [25]. Serovar 4b is responsible for most foodborne outbreaks and sporadic cases [26]. Therefore, these serovars may possess specific virulence factors that improve the capability of particular strains to cause systemic infections, such as the ability to invade intestinal epithelial cells [27].
The genome content of 113 strains has been analyzed using DNA macroarray hybridizations. Only the presence or absence of genes were observed. Results indicated that many of the genomic differences between these strains were associated with surface proteins and genes involved in sugar metabolism [28]. These could serve as genes necessary for adaptation to various environments, including virulence factors required for intracellular replication [29]. Genomic analysis of serovar 4b revealed a group of surface protein genes that are specific to L. monocytogenes. These include inlA, inlB, inlC, inlG, inlH, inlE, and inlF [28]. Interestingly, analysis of serovar 4a, which is mostly associated with animal cases of listeriosis, revealed a lack of internalin genes aside from inlAB thus reflecting their lower potential to cause disease in humans [28].
Proteins involved in the phosphotransferase system (PTS) of glucose have been shown to influence the expression of virulence genes [30]. PrfA is the major regulator of virulence in L. monocytogenes, where it controls the expression of multiple genes including those encoding listeriolysin O and ActA, both of which are involved in cell-to-cell dissemination and invasion [31,32]. Through the decrease in expression of PTS operons and transport of sugars when PrfA is overexpressed, it is possible that PrfA activity is controlled by a direct interaction with the PTS [33]. PTS (mannose) contributes to the down regulation of virulence gene transcription in glucose medium [34]. However, a genetic analysis of several strains indicated that β-glucoside-specific PTS was not found in lineage II, which is made up of serovars 4b, 4d, 4e, 7, 1/2b, and 3b [28]. Therefore, another PTS system must be utilized in the regulation of the PrfA regulon in these serovars of lineage II. Specifically, serovar 4b may have evolved other PTSs that are more efficient within a mammalian host due to its prevalence in hospital cases and deaths.
A recent genomic comparison between serovars 1/2a demonstrated the conservation of multiple genes associated with virulence including internalins, PrfA, and various sRNAs [35]. Mutations were found in PrfA in EGD-e compared to EGD [35]. This indicates that genomic analyses alone cannot determine pathogenic potential. Sigma B, an alternative stress factor controlled by PrfA, has been shown to contribute to virulence [36]. An overexpression of both PrfA and sigma B have been observed in lineage II serovars [37,38]. This could be associated with the fact that these are isolates known to inhabit and adapt to multiple environments (inside or outside a host). Though sigma B was identified in lineage I and III but not IV, expression was decreased upon exposure to acidic (pH 2.5) and oxidative stress. Another recent study compared the genomes of 4b strains to determine links related to outbreaks of L. monocytogenes [39]. This study identified three clades among the 4b strains tested, 28 SNPs were found that were unique to 4b variant strains of that were not present in lineage II among the lmo037-lmo037 region. Genomic comparisons between these strains indicated that the majority of genes unique to the 4bV strains included primarily hypothetical and phage related genes. Seven were found to be internalin or internalin-like genes and others may be involved in survival in unique environments, such as ferrous iron transport. In addition to relatedness among clades, another study indicated relatedness of 4bV strains based on geographic location [40].
Recently, a genome-scale metabolic model was completed against 6 different strains of L. monocytogenes [41]. There were 1,116 metabolites contained in the 6 strains. Unique metabolites were found in strain J2-064 (p-Hydroxybenzaldehyde) and serovar 1/2a strains tested (Toxopyrimidine). There were also differences in the nutrients utilized between the strains tested that indicated serovar specific differences.
Another recent study identified that 8 genes were highly significantly associated with food isolates from lineage II [42]. In this study, 174 isolates were compared to identify genes and SNPs that were associated with food or clinical isolates. The 8 genes identified were mostly hypothetical genes. It is necessary to further characterize these genes to determine the role they have in L. monocytogenes survival. Additionally, of the isolates analyzed, 45 out of 125 stress related genes were either missing or truncated in some isolates. There are also differences in the presence of internalization genes. For instance, lmo1082 occurs more frequently in lineage II than lineage I, yet lmo0320 was found more frequently among lineage I than lineage II. This indicates a necessity for characterizing isolates from various serovars based on their infection ability as a means to determine similarities among serovars.
There are both technical and functional limitations in analyzing the genome for pathogenic potential. Possession of genes related to virulence may not necessarily correlate with pathogenic potential. In order to determine the function of a gene product, it is necessary to examine expression under various conditions. One must also consider the presence of hot spots (regions with elevated recombination rates) within the genome that can continually alter the gene sequences.

3. Acidity Induced Stress Response

Upon ingestion, L. monocytogenes encounters the stressor of acidic conditions within the stomach as a first barrier to bacterial invasion. Several mechanisms have been acquired in order to overcome this environment, including the acid tolerance response (ATR) and the glutamate decarboxylase system (GAD). According to O’Driscoll and colleagues (1996), survival assays showed that a pre-exposure to a pH of 5.5 increased the resistance of L. monocytogenes to a pH of 3.5. This suggests that the ATR assists in tolerance of acidic conditions after adaptation [43]. The ATR two-component pathway also provides cross protection of L. monocytogenes against high temperatures, oxidative and osmotic stress [43]. Through this protection, survival following exposure to stressors found throughout the gastrointestinal tract is increased and thus may be essential to the ultimate development of listeriosis.
The GAD system has been thoroughly characterized and found to assist in acid tolerance. Upon exposure to low pH, glutamate is converted to γ-aminobutyrate (GABA) [44]. This reaction occurs through the consumption of protons which reduces the proton concentration in the cell resulting in lower pH [44]. Not all L. monocytogenes strains possess the GAD system; it has been shown to be required by certain strains for maintaining homeostasis within gastric juices [45]. The expression of GAD is induced upon exposure to chloride ions, low pH and anaerobiosis [46,47,48]. Activation of GAD is stimulated within the stomach upon exposure to low pH but provides cross protection against anaerobiosis and bile salts within the small intestine and potentially the gall bladder. However, recent studies have shown that acid shock at low temperatures of 25 °C may induce prfA [49]. This suggests that low pH could serve as a trigger for the expression of virulence and stress response.

4. Bile Induced Stress Response

Bile is produced in the liver, stored in the gall bladder, and released into the small intestine upon ingestion of food; bile is composed of pigments, cholesterol, bile salts, and water. Bile salts are saturated, hydroxylated C-24 cyclopentanophenanthrene sterols that are synthesized in the hepatocytes from cholesterol as chenodeoxycholic acid and cholic acid [50].
Bile is released from the liver through the left and right hepatic ducts forming the common duct, which connects to the gall bladder. Once in the gall bladder, the bile is concentrated by as much as 5 to 10-fold through the removal of water and electrolytes [51,52]. Bile salts are further metabolized by conjugation to glycine or taurine, which decreases their pKa value to about 5 [50]. After a meal, bile from the gall bladder is released into the common duct where it enters the duodenum of the small intestine [52]. Once bile is secreted into the intestinal tract, a majority of bile salts are reabsorbed and recycled through the enterohepatic circulation [53].
Bile salts are amphipathic molecules that have been shown to possess antimicrobial properties; bile salts have been shown to degrade viral and bacterial membranes containing lipids and also induce DNA damage [54,55,56]. In order for enteric pathogens to survive, they must possess mechanisms to resist these antimicrobial effects of bile salts. L. monocytogenes possesses numerous mechanisms to allow for resistance against bile, including the bile salt hydrolase bsh [57,58], the general stress response sigma factor sigB [51,59], the bile exclusion system bilE [60], and virulence regulator prfA [58]. The bile salt hydrolase catalyzes the deconjugation of bile acids and is produced by several Gram-negative and Gram-positive enteric bacteria such as Enterococcus [61] and Lactobacillus [62]. This deconjugation occurs through the hydrolysis of an amide bond that links bile acids to their amino acid conjugate glycine or taurine [63]. Studies have also shown that deletion of the bsh gene reduces the ability of L. monocytogenes to cause systemic infections by reducing the colonization potential within the gastrointestinal tract [57,58]. This demonstrates the importance of the bile salt hydrolase as one of the first defenses used to overcome stressors encountered within the gastrointestinal tract [57,58].
The general stress response sigma factor sigB is involved in regulating the expression of osmolyte transporters, such as OpuC, and is also involved in regulating processes needed for survival during oxidative stress, reduced pH, and starvation. The sigB transcription factor also serves as a positive regulator of factor A (PrfA), thus leading to the activation and regulation of major virulence factors [64]. Additionally, studies have shown a connection between sigB and the expression of genes related to bile resistance such as bilE and bsh [60,65]. BilE, the bile exclusion system, serves to prevent bile from entering the cell. It is also LexA regulated [66], indicating an association of bile resistance with the SOS response. LexA is auto-catalytically cleaved after interacting with RecA, which disrupts the DNA-binding portion of LexA resulting in DNA repair. PrfA serves as the virulence regulator and overlap has been identified between the prfA response and activation of stress response mechanisms similar to SigB [67,68].
Since bile is toxic to most pathogens, the gall bladder is usually a sterile environment. However, L. monocytogenes is able to overcome the toxicity of this environment and grow extracellularly. It has been proposed that extracellular growth within the gall bladder may provide an efficient route of transmission where the transit from the bile duct to the intestines could occur in as little as five minutes [17]. Expression of internalins were found to increase in avirulent strain HCC23 (internalin A) but decrease in virulent strains [69]. This suggests that bile differentially regulates the invasive potential of L. monocytogenes.

5. Anaerobiosis Induced Stress Response

Oxygen availability varies throughout the gastrointestinal tract. In the gastrointestinal tract, the stomach is microaerophilic (1 to 3% oxygen) and becomes more anaerobic within the intestines [70]. Carbon dioxide is known to inhibit the growth of most bacteria [71] and is found as a byproduct of reactions with acid in the stomach. The amount of carbon dioxide produced varies from individual to individual. Jydegaard-Axelson and colleagues [8] observed an increase in the expression of genes needed for survival under acidic conditions and an increase in branch-chain fatty acids in the cell membrane when L. monocytogenes is cultured under elevated carbon dioxide and anaerobic conditions. In addition, gene expression changed for invasion-associated internalin proteins InlA and LmaA, which are involved in attachment and invasion of host mammalian cells. Therefore, the increase in expression of invasion proteins could be attributed to a preference to escape the acidic environment.
It has previously been concluded that atmospheric environmental factors could contribute to the ability of L. monocytogenes to survive in the presence of stressors [72]. Studies have demonstrated that the activity of the bile salt hydrolase increases under anaerobic conditions [58]. Buchanan and Klawitter [67] observed that anaerobic conditions increased survival of L. monocytogenes under acidic conditions (pH 4.5). Also, oxygen restriction enhances growth at lower temperatures (approximately 19 °C). Together, these data suggest that oxygen availability could influence bile resistance and therefore the virulence capability of L. monocytogenes.
L. monocytogenes is a facultative anaerobe, which allows the bacterium to be able to undergo aerobic respiration, fermentation, and anaerobic respiration. However, this is still dependent upon the ability to respond to oxygen availability. This environmental sensing is typically controlled by a two-component signal transduction system which consists of a membrane bound sensor and a cytoplasmic response regulator [73]. Although little research has been conducted to analyze the connection of anaerobiosis to increased survival in the presence of stressors in L. monocytogenes, much is known about other Gram-positive organisms. In various Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, two-component systems have been shown to regulate metabolism and the expression of virulence factors in response to decreased oxygen concentrations [74,75,76]. For instance, the SrrAB two-component system of S. aureus is involved in the activation of stress response proteins, specifically those involved in DNA repair, the oxidative stress response and the alternative sigma factor, SigB, in oxygen limited environments [77]. However, this activation is in conjunction with multiple two-component systems [78].
The two-component system ResDE of B. subtilis, homologous to SrrAB in S. aureus, has been shown to regulate virulence factors, sporulation, and fermentation in B. subtilis [75,76]. A homolog to resD has been characterized in L. monocytogenes. ResD was found to influence the activity of prfA in L. monocytogenes, which in turn alters the expression of several virulence genes, including inlA [79]. This suggests that ResD may be an important factor in the regulation of virulence factors and stress responses under low-oxygen conditions.
In M. tuberculosis, DosSR (DevSR) is a two-component system that consists of DosS histidine kinase and DosR response regulator. The DosSR system is induced under various levels of stress such as carbon starvation and heat shock [80]. DosSR is also induced by hypoxia, thus indicating that this is an oxygen sensor [81]. A recent genomic study identified DosP in L. monocytogenes, which is similar to the histidine kinase found in M. tuberculosis, suggesting that L. monocytogenes belong to the category of Gram-positives that possess an oxygen sensor [82,83]. Similarity between Gram-positive organisms suggests a link between virulence, stress response and two-component signal transduction systems that affect the organisms’ ability to detect oxygen levels.
A recent study by Wright et al. [78] has identified a potential link between oxygen availability and bile resistance by comparing growth of several strains of L. monocytogenes in 0%, 1%, 5%, and 10% porcine bile. Results indicated that bile resistance increased under anaerobic conditions compared to aerobic for virulent strains F2365, 10403S and EGD-e but not avirulent strain HCC23. A comprehensive total proteomic study to identify mechanisms (metabolism and stress response) found that proteins associated with the cell envelope, membrane bioenergetics, cell division, and dehydrogenases involved in NADH:NAD+ alteration were increased under anaerobic conditions [84]. This suggests that these proteins may be involved in bile resistance during growth anaerobically. However, an oxygen sensor that may regulate these mechanisms has not been identified.

6. Conclusions

Numerous response systems have been found that confer protection against multiple stressors, including pH, bile, osmolarity and temperature. However, the influence of reduced oxygen availability has not been thoroughly characterized in these systems. For instance, several studies that have analyzed and characterized the bile resistance mechanisms of L. monocytogenes were conducted under aerobic conditions. The conditions of the gallbladder and small intestine, where bile salt concentrations are at its highest, is an environment ranging from microaerophilic to anaerobic [85]. Therefore, aerobic conditions do not accurately model physiological conditions within the human gastrointestinal tract.
Recent research has begun to suggest a connection between oxygen availability and the stress response in Gram-positive bacteria. Future studies include the identification of the potential oxygen sensor responsible for detecting available oxygen concentrations and development of drugs to target this sensor to reduce and prevent infection with L. monocytogenes. Therefore, it is imperative that the oxygen response of L. monocytogenes be characterized relative to the stress response.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded through the NIH COBRE P20GM103646 and NIH INBRE P20GM103476. Author Morgan L. Davis was supported through a graduate research assistantship by the Department of Food Science at the University of Arkansas. Andrew Micciche is acknowledged for his assistance in submitting this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mead, P.S.; Slutsker, L.; Dietz, V.; McCaig, L.F.; Bresee, J.S.; Shapiro, C.; Griffin, P.M.; Tauxe, R.V. Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1999, 5, 607–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Buzby, J.C.; Roberts, T.; Jordin Lin, C.T.; MacDonald, J. Bacterial Foodborne Disease: Medical Costs and Productivity Losses; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  3. Sleator, R.D.; Watson, D.; Hill, C.; Gahan, C.G. The interaction between Listeria monocytogenes and the host gastrointestinal tract. Microbiology 2009, 155, 2463–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Murray, E.G.D.; Webb, R.A.; Swann, M.B.R. A disease of rabbit characterized by a large mononuclear leukocytosis, caused by a hitherto undescribed bacillus bacterium monocytogenes. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1926, 29, 407–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gellin, B.G.; Broome, C.V. Listeriosis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1989, 261, 1313–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schlech, W.F. Foodborne Listeriosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 31, 770–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Freitag, N.E.; Port, G.C.; Miner, M.D. Listeria monocytogenes—From saprophyte to intracellular pathogen. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jydegaard-Axelsen, A.M.; Hoiby, P.E.; Holmstrom, K.; Russell, N.; Knochel, S. CO2- and anaerobiosis-induced changes in physiology and gene expression of different Listeria monocytogenes strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4111–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Begley, M.; Gahan, C.G.; Hill, C. Bile stress response in Listeria monocytogenes LO28: Adaptation, cross-protection, and identification of genetic loci involved in bile resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 6005–6012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hardy, J.; Francis, K.P.; DeBoer, M.; Chu, P.; Gibbs, K.; Contag, C.H. Extracellular replication of Listeria monocytogenes in the murine gall bladder. Science 2004, 303, 851–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Davis, M.J.; Coote, P.J.; O’Byrne, C.P. Acid tolerance in Listeria monocytogenes: The adaptive acid tolerance response (ATR) and growth-phase-dependent acid resistance. Microbiology 1996, 142 Pt. 10, 2975–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pentecost, M.; Kumaran, J.; Ghosh, P.; Amieva, M.R. Listeria monocytogenes Internalin B activates junctional endocytosis to accelerate intestinal invasion. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jensen, V.B.; Harty, J.T.; Jones, B.D. Interactions of the invasive pathogens Salmonella typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and Shigella flexneri with M Cells and Murine Peyer’s patches. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 3758–3766. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Nikitas, G.; Deschamps, C.; Disson, O.; Niault, T.; Cossart, P.; Lecuit, M. Transcytosis of Listeria monocytogenes across the intestinal barrier upon specific targeting of goblet cell accessible E-cadherin. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 2263–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Disson, O.; Bleriot, C.; Jacob, J.M.; Serafini, N.; Dulauroy, S.; Jouvion, G.; Fevre, C.; Gessain, G.; Thouvenot, P.; Eberl, G.; et al. Peyer’s patch myeloid cells infection by Listeria signals through gp38(+) stromal cells and locks intestinal villus invasion. J. Exp. Med. 2018, 215, 2936–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Eimerman, P.R. Characterization of Listeria monocytogenes Growth and Colonization of the Murine Gallbladder; Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hardy, J.; Margolis, J.J.; Contag, C.H. Induced biliary excretion of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 1819–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Walker, S.J.; Archer, P.; Banks, J.G. Growth of Listeria monocytogenes at refrigeration temperatures. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1990, 68, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Junttila, J.R.; Niemelä, S.I.; Hirn, J. Minimum growth temperatures of Listeria monocytogenes and non-haemolytic listeria. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1988, 65, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Meinersmann, R.J.; Phillips, R.W.; Wiedmann, M.; Berrang, M.E. Multilocus sequence typing of Listeria monocytogenes by use of hypervariable genes reveals clonal and recombination histories of three lineages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 2193–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Orsi, R.H.; den Bakker, H.C.; Wiedmann, M. Listeria monocytogenes lineages: Genomics, evolution, ecology, and phenotypic characteristics. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 301, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Piffaretti, J.C.; Kressebuch, H.; Aeschbacher, M.; Bille, J.; Bannerman, E.; Musser, J.M.; Selander, R.K.; Rocourt, J. Genetic characterization of clones of the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes causing epidemic disease. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 3818–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rasmussen, O.F.; Skouboe, P.; Dons, L.; Rossen, L.; Olsen, J.E. Listeria monocytogenes exists in at least three evolutionary lines: Evidence from flagellin, invasive associated protein and listeriolysin O genes. Microbiology 1995, 141 Pt 9, 2053–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ward, T.J.; Ducey, T.F.; Usgaard, T.; Dunn, K.A.; Bielawski, J.P. Multilocus genotyping assays for single nucleotide polymorphism-based subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7629–7642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. McLauchlin, J. Distribution of serovars of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from different categories of patients with listeriosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1990, 9, 210–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Swaminathan, B.; Gerner-Smidt, P. The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microbes Infect. 2007, 9, 1236–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Czuprynski, C.J.; Faith, N.G.; Steinberg, H. Ability of the Listeria monocytogenes strain scott a to cause systemic infection in mice infected by the intragastric route. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2893–2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Doumith, M.; Cazalet, C.; Simoes, N.; Frangeul, L.; Jacquet, C.; Kunst, F.; Martin, P.; Cossart, P.; Glaser, P.; Buchrieser, C. New aspects regarding evolution and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes revealed by comparative genomics and DNA Arrays. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 1072–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dussurget, O.; Pizarro-Cerda, J.; Cossart, P. Molecular determinants of Listeria monocytogenes virulence. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 58, 587–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Brehm, K.; Ripio, M.-T.; Kreft, J.; Vázquez-Boland, J.-A. The bvr locus of Listeria monocytogenes mediates virulence gene repression by β-glucosides. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 5024–5032. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Chakraborty, T.; Leimeister-Wächter, M.; Domann, E.; Hartl, M.; Goebel, W.; Nichterlein, T.; Notermans, S. Coordinate regulation of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes requires the product of the prfA gene. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Scortti, M.; Monzo, H.J.; Lacharme-Lora, L.; Lewis, D.A.; Vazquez-Boland, J.A. The PrfA virulence regulon. Microbes Infect. 2007, 9, 1196–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Marr, A.K.; Joseph, B.; Mertins, S.; Ecke, R.; Muller-Altrock, S.; Goebel, W. Overexpression of PrfA leads to growth inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in glucose-containing culture media by interfering with glucose uptake. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3887–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vu-Khac, H.; Miller, K.W. Regulation of mannose phosphotransferase system permease and virulence gene expression in Listeria monocytogenes by the EII(t)Man transporter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 6671–6678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Becavin, C.; Bouchier, C.; Lechat, P.; Archambaud, C.; Creno, S.; Gouin, E.; Wu, Z.; Kühbacher, A.; Brisse, S.; Pucciarelli, M.G.; et al. Comparison of widely used Listeria monocytogenes strains EGD, 10403S, and EGD-e highlights genomic variations underlying differences in pathogenicity. mBio 2014, 5, e00969-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nadon, C.A.; Bowen, B.M.; Wiedmann, M.; Boor, K.J. Sigma B contributes to PrfA-mediated virulence in Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 3948–3952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Moorhead, S.M.; Dykes, G.A. The role of the sigB gene in the general stress response of Listeria monocytogenes varies between a strain of serotype 1/2a and a strain of serotype 4c. Curr. Microbiol. 2003, 46, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Moorhead, S.M.; Dykes, G.A. Influence of the sigB gene on the cold stress survival and subsequent recovery of two Listeria monocytogenes serotypes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 91, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Burall, L.S.; Grim, C.J.; Mammel, M.K.; Datta, A.R. A comprehensive evaluation of the genetic relatedness of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b variant strains. Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Burall, L.S.; Grim, C.J.; Datta, A.R. A clade of Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b variant strains linked to recent listeriosis outbreaks associated with produce from a defined geographic region in the US. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Metz, Z.P.; Ding, T.; Baumler, D.J. Using genome-scale metabolic models to compare serovars of the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pirone-Davies, C.; Chen, Y.; Pightling, A.; Ryan, G.; Wang, Y.; Yao, K.; Hoffmann, M.; Allard, M.W. Genes significantly associated with lineage II food isolates of Listeria monocytogenes. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. O’Driscoll, B.; Gahan, C.G.; Hill, C. Adaptive acid tolerance response in Listeria monocytogenes: Isolation of an acid-tolerant mutant which demonstrates increased virulence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 1693–1698. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Small, P.L.C.; Waterman, S.R. Acid stress, anaerobiosis and gadCB: Lessons from Lactococcus lactis and Escherichia coli. Trends Microbiol. 1998, 6, 214–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cotter, P.D.; Gahan, C.G.M.; Hill, C. A glutamate decarboxylase system protects Listeria monocytogenes in gastric fluid. Mol. Microbiol. 2001, 40, 465–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sanders, J.W.; Leenhouts, K.; Burghoorn, J.; Brands, J.R.; Venema, G.; Kok, J. A chloride-inducible acid resistance mechanism in Lactococcus lactis and its regulation. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 27, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. De Biase, D.; Tramonti, A.; Bossa, F.; Visca, P. The response to stationary-phase stress conditions in Escherichia coli: Role and regulation of the glutamic acid decarboxylase system. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 32, 1198–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Blankenhorn, D.; Phillips, J.; Slonczewski, J.L. Acid- and base-induced proteins during aerobic and anaerobic growth of Escherichia coli revealed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 2209–2216. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Neuhaus, K.; Satorhelyi, P.; Schauer, K.; Scherer, S.; Fuchs, T. Acid shock of Listeria monocytogenes at low environmental temperatures induces prfA, epithelial cell invasion, and lethality towards Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Vlahcevic, Z.R. Regulation of cholesterol 7 alpha-hydroxylase by different effectors. Ital. J. Gastroenterol 1996, 28, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Dowd, G.C.; Joyce, S.A.; Hill, C.; Gahan, C.G. Investigation of the mechanisms by which Listeria monocytogenes grows in porcine gallbladder bile. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ridlon, J.M.; Kang, D.J.; Hylemon, P.B. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J. Lipid Res. 2006, 47, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chiang, J.Y. Bile acids: Regulation of synthesis. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 1955–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Begley, M.; Kerr, C.; Hill, C. Exposure to bile influences biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes. Gut Pathog. 2009, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Gunn, J.S. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance and response to bile. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bernstein, C.; Bernstein, H.; Payne, C.M.; Beard, S.E.; Schneider, J. Bile salt activation of stress response promoters in Escherichia coli. Curr. Microbiol. 1999, 39, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Begley, M.; Gahan, C.G.; Hill, C. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 625–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dussurget, O.; Cabanes, D.; Dehoux, P.; Lecuit, M.; Buchrieser, C.; Glaser, P.; Cossart, P. Listeria monocytogenes bile salt hydrolase is a PrfA-regulated virulence factor involved in the intestinal and hepatic phases of listeriosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 45, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Begley, M.; Sleator, R.D.; Gahan, C.G.; Hill, C. Contribution of three bile-associated loci, bsh, pva, and btlB, to gastrointestinal persistence and bile tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 894–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sleator, R.D.; Wemekamp-Kamphuis, H.H.; Gahan, C.G.; Abee, T.; Hill, C. A PrfA-regulated bile exclusion system (BilE) is a novel virulence factor in Listeria monocytogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1183–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Franz, C.M.A.P.; Specht, I.; Haberer, P.; Holzapfel, W.H. Bile salt hydrolase activity of enterococci isolated from food: Screening and quantitative determination. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 725–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Grill, J.P.; Cayuela, C.; Antoine, J.M.; Schneider, F. Isolation and characterization of a Lactobacillus amylovorus mutant depleted in conjugated bile salt hydrolase activity: Relation between activity and bile salt resistance. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 89, 553–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tanaka, H.; Hashiba, H.; Mierau, I.; Kok, J. Bile salt hydrolase of Bifidobacterium longum—Biochemical and genetic characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 2502–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ferreira, A.; Sue, D.; O’Byrne, C.P.; Boor, K.J. Role of Listeria monocytogenes B in survival of lethal acidic conditions and in the acquired acid tolerance response. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 2692–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sue, D. B-dependent expression patterns of compatible solute transporter genes opuCA and lmo1421 and the conjugated bile salt hydrolase gene bsh in Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiology 2003, 149, 3247–3256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Van der Veen, S.; van Schalkwijk, S.; Molenaar, D.; de Vos, W.M.; Abee, T.; Wells-Bennik, M.H. The SOS response of Listeria monocytogenes is involved in stress resistance and mutagenesis. Microbiology 2010, 156, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Yuewei, H.; Raengpradub, S.; Schwab, U.; Loss, C.; Orsi, R.H.; Wiedmann, M.; Boor, K.J. Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses demonstrate interactions between the transcriptional regulators CtsR and Sigma B in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 7967–7980. [Google Scholar]
  68. Milohanic, E.; Glaser, P.; Coppée, J.-Y.; Frangeul, L.; Vega, Y.; Vázquez-Boland, J.A.; Kunst, F.; Cossart, P.; Buchrieser, C. Transcriptome analysis of Listeria monocytogenes identifies three groups of genes differently regulated by PrfA. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 47, 1613–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Payne, A.; Schmidt, T.B.; Nanduri, B.; Pendarvis, K.; Pittman, J.R.; Thornton, J.A.; Grissett, J.; Donaldson, J.R. Proteomic analysis of the response of Listeria monocytogenes to bile salts under anaerobic conditions. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. He, G.; Shankar, R.A.; Chzhan, M.; Samouilov, A.; Kuppusamy, P.; Zweier, J.L. Noninvasive measurement of anatomic structure and intraluminal oxygenation in the gastrointestinal tract of living mice with spatial and spectral EPR imaging. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 4586–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Gill, C.O.; Tan, K.H. Effect of carbon dioxide on growth of meat spoilage bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1980, 39, 317–319. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. King, T.; Ferenci, T.; Szabo, E.A. The effect of growth atmosphere on the ability of Listeria monocytogenes to survive exposure to acid, proteolytic enzymes and bile salts. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 84, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Stock, A.M.; Robinson, V.L.; Goudreau, P.N. Two-component signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Throup, J.P.; Lunsford, R.D.; Lonsdale, J.T.; Bryant, A.P.; McDevitt, D.; Rosenberg, M.; Burnham, M.K. The srhSR gene pair from Staphylococcus aureus: Genomic and proteomic approaches to the identification and characterization of gene function. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 10392–10401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Yarwood, J.M.; McCormick, J.K.; Schlievert, P.M. Identification of a novel two-component regulatory system that acts in global regulation of virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 1113–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Nakano, M.M.; Dailly, Y.P.; Zuber, P.; Clark, D.P. Characterization of anaerobic fermentative growth of Bacillus subtilis: Identification of fermentation end products and genes required for growth. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 6749–6755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kinkel, T.L.; Roux, C.M.; Dunman, P.M.; Fang, F.C. The Staphylococcus aureus SrrAB two-component system promotes resistance to nitrosative stress and hypoxia. mBio 2013, 4, e00696-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Michel, A.; Agerer, F.; Hauck, C.R.; Herrmann, M.; Ullrich, J.; Hacker, J.; Ohlsen, K. Global regulatory impact of ClpP protease of Staphylococcus aureus on regulons involved in virulence, oxidative stress response, autolysis, and DNA repair. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5783–5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Larsen, M.H.; Kallipolitis, B.H.; Christiansen, J.K.; Olsen, J.E.; Ingmer, H. The response regulator ResD modulates virulence gene expression in response to carbohydrates in Listeria monocytogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61, 1622–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kendall, S.L.; Movahedzadeh, F.; Rison, S.C.G.; Stoker, N.G.; Wernisch, L.; Parish, T.; Duncan, K.; Betts, J.C.; Stoker, N.G. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis dosRS two-component system is induced by multiple stresses. Tuberculosis 2004, 84, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Kumar, A.; Toledo, J.C.; Patel, R.P.; Lancaster, J.R., Jr.; Steyn, A.J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis DosS is a redox sensor and DosT is a hypoxia sensor. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11568–11573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Chiara, M.; D’Erchia, A.M.; Manzari, C.; Minotto, A.; Montagna, C.; Addante, N.; Santagada, G.; Latorre, L.; Pesole, G.; Horner, D.S.; et al. Draft genome sequences of six Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from dairy products from a processing plant in southern Italy. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e00282-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Holch, A.; Webb, K.; Lukjancenko, O.; Ussery, D.; Rosenthal, B.M.; Gram, L. Genome sequencing identifies two nearly unchanged strains of persistent Listeria monocytogenes isolated at two different fish processing plants sampled 6 years apart. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 2944–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wright, M.L.; Pendarvis, K.; Nanduri, B.; Edelmann, M.J.; Jenkins, H.N.; Reddy, J.S.; Wilson, J.G.; Ding, X.; Broadway, P.R.; Ammari, M.G.; et al. The effect of oxygen on bile resistance in Listeria monocytogenes. J. Proteom. Bioinform. 2016, 9, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Crawford, N. A study on human bile and some of its constituents. I. Gall bladder bile. J. Med. Lab. Technol. 1955, 13, 304–322. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Davis, M.L.; Ricke, S.C.; Donaldson, J.R. Establishment of Listeria monocytogenes in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7030075

AMA Style

Davis ML, Ricke SC, Donaldson JR. Establishment of Listeria monocytogenes in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(3):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7030075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Davis, Morgan L., Steven C. Ricke, and Janet R. Donaldson. 2019. "Establishment of Listeria monocytogenes in the Gastrointestinal Tract" Microorganisms 7, no. 3: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7030075

APA Style

Davis, M. L., Ricke, S. C., & Donaldson, J. R. (2019). Establishment of Listeria monocytogenes in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Microorganisms, 7(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7030075

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop