Next Article in Journal
Effects of Bacillus subtilis WB60 and Lactococcus lactis on Growth, Immune Responses, Histology and Gene Expression in Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid Detection of Echinocandins Resistance by MALDI-TOF MS in Candida parapsilosis Complex
Previous Article in Journal
Antifungal Activity of Beauveria bassiana Endophyte against Botrytis cinerea in Two Solanaceae Crops
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification by MALDI-TOF MS of Sporothrix brasiliensis Isolated from a Subconjunctival Infiltrative Lesion in an Immunocompetent Patient
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 1
10.3390/microorganisms8010066
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First Comprehensive Report of Clinical Fusarium Strains Isolated in the State of Sao Paulo (Brazil) and Identified by MALDI-TOF MS and Molecular Biology

by
Mario Henrique Paziani
1,2,
Ludmilla Tonani Carvalho
1,
Marcia de Souza Carvalho Melhem
3,4,
Margarete Teresa Gottardo de Almeida
5,
Maria Emilia Nadaletto Bonifácio da Silva
1,
Roberto Martinez
6,
Cledir Santos
2,* and
Marcia Regina von Zeska Kress
1
1
Faculdade de Ciencias Farmaceuticas de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, SP 14040-900, Brazil
2
Department of Chemical Sciences and Natural Resources, BIOREN-UFRO, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4811-230, Chile
3
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS 79070-900, Brazil
4
Secretary of Health, Government of Sao Paulo State, Sao Paulo, SP 01246-000, Brazil
5
Faculdade de Medicina de Sao Jose do Rio Preto-FAMERP, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP 15090-000, Brazil
6
Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, SP 14040-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(1), 66; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010066
Submission received: 28 November 2019 / Revised: 22 December 2019 / Accepted: 28 December 2019 / Published: 31 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mass Spectrometry: An Undeniable Tool in Current Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to compare the performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), phenotypic and molecular methods for the identification of Fusarium species complexes isolated from clinical cases in the State of Sao Paulo (Brazil) between the years 2001 and 2017. Sequencing of ITS region of ribosomal DNA and elongation factor 1 alpha gene (ET1α) were used as reference method in the analysis of a total of 108 Fusarium spp. clinical strains isolated from human hosts with superficial and systemic infections. Agreement between MALDI-TOF-MS and molecular data was observed for 97 out of 108 clinical isolates (89.8%), whereas five (4.6%) and six (5.5%) clinical isolates were misidentified and were not identified by MALDI-TOF MS, respectively. ITS region sequences and MALDI-TOF MS mass spectra identified and grouped correctly most of Fusarium clinical isolates at species complex level. This investigation highlights the potential of MALDI-TOF MS technique as a fast and cost-efficient alternative for clinical Fusarium identification. However, MALDI-TOF MS requires a more accurate and larger database. This work is the first comprehensive report for Fusarium population, based on phenotypic analyses, proteomic profile by MALDI-TOF and phylogenetic analyses of Fusarium species complexes isolated from clinical cases in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

1. Introduction

Fusarium spp. are filamentous fungi isolated from a wide variety of substrates such as soil, plant and water, mainly in tropical regions. They are mainly primary plant pathogens, although some Fusarium species can live within plants tissues as endophytic fungi [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The great ability to survive in different climates makes this fungal species highly adaptable to different environments. Fusarium spp. asexual reproduction results in the formation of micro- and macro-conidia, which are responsible for the dispersion in the environment and infections in the host [1,2,8,9].
In recent years, Fusarium spp. gained importance in human health. There is an increasing incidence of infections related to immunosuppressed patients (e.g., elderly, AIDS, solid organ, and bone marrow transplantation; oncological, hematological, and autoimmune diseases) [10,11]. The number of subcutaneous fusarioses has increased at alarming levels, making fusariosis, after aspergillosis, the second most common filamentous fungal infection in patients with hematologic neoplasms [12,13,14].
Fusariosis may progress from superficial infection to a generalized severe infection in humans, with a mortality rate of 50%, 40%, and 37.5% by disseminated, skin, and pulmonary fusariosis, respectively [8,10,11]. Moreover, 15% to 27% of patients with keratitis by Fusarium spp. present ulcers and high corneal damage [8], and have also been reported to cause mycetoma in patients of tropical countries [15]. However, failures in the correct identifications result in few information about the species involved in these infections cases [16,17].
The genus Fusarium houses more than 200 species divided into 22 species complexes, which are differentiated by morphology, host association, and mainly by molecular features [16,17]. Species complex (SC) of Fusarium solani (FSSC), F. oxysporum (FOSC), and F. fujikuroi (FFSC) present the greatest clinical importance [18,19].
Classical morphology identification including macro- and micromorphology analysis is a time-consuming method and is not a completely straight forward taxonomical methodology. However, it is still used as an important way to delimitate the boundary of fungal species within a genus, mainly in case of discordant information [20].
Molecular methods are the gold standard of fungal taxonomy which generates accurate identification. It represents a useful strategy once presents fast results, and high sensitivity and specificity in comparison with the conventional methods of fungal identification [21,22].
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has been used as a routine technique for fungal identification at species level, and represents an important phenotypic methodology used for fungal identification [23,24,25]. In addition, MALDI-TOF MS has been used to identify both yeasts and filamentous fungal species and other microbial taxonomic groups [26,27].
The databases of the software associated with a MALDI-TOF MS is enriched by reference spectra of the most commonly encountered yeasts in the laboratory, such as Candida spp. and Cryptococcus spp. However, relatively few data are currently available regarding the identification of filamentous fungi [28].
The aim of this study was to compare for the first time the performance of MALDI-TOF MS, phenotypic analyses and molecular methods on the identification of Fusarium species complex clinical strains isolated from biological samples of patients with superficial and systemic fusariosis, between the years 2001 and 2017 from Sao Paulo State, Brazil.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Fungal Strains and Culture Conditions

The clinical strains from this study were isolated from biological samples (toenail, fingernail, skin, blood, and peritoneal fluid) of patients with superficial and systemic fusariosis, between the years 2001 and 2017 in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. A total of 108 clinical isolates of Fusarium spp. were studied. Among them, 39 clinical isolates were obtained from Sao Jose do Rio Preto (20°49′13″ S, 49°22′47″ W), 55 clinical isolates from Ribeirao Preto (10′36″ S, 47°49′15″ W), and 14 clinical isolates from Sao Paulo city (32′56″ S, 46°38′20″ W). The control strains were Fusarium keratoplasticum INCQS 40099 (ATCC 36031) and F. oxysporum INCQS 40144 (ATCC 48112).
Clinical isolates were cultivated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium (Becton, Dickinson Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) by incubation at 28 °C for 3 to 5 days. The microconidia were collected with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, and filtered with sterile Miracloth (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). Microconidia were counted with a hemocytometer and the microconidia suspensions were prepared with sterile PBS.
The present study was approved by the ethics committee Comite de Etica em Pesquisa (CEP) of the Faculdade de Ciencias Farmaceuticas de Ribeirao Preto, Universidade de Sao Paulo (code n° 0450-CAAE 70079517.8.00005403, approved on 4 September 2017). All clinical isolates were deposited at the Chilean Culture Collection of Type Strains (http://ccct.ufro.cl), which is member of the World Federation of Culture Collection under the registration number WDCM 1111.

2.2. Phenotypic Identification of Fusarium Genus

Fusarium identification at genus level was performed by classical method. The morphological identification of fungi was based on the taxonomic key and guides available for Fusarium species [29]. Briefly, the fungal colonies were grown on PDA medium at 28 °C for 3 to 5 days. The colony color (front and reverse side) were observed. Micromorphological analysis was performed by microculture method. Microconidia of clinical isolates were inoculated on a thin layer of PDA culture medium on a sterile microscope slide. A sterile coverslip was placed above the inoculum and incubated at 28 °C for 48 h in humid chamber. The coverslips with the fungal cells were mounted on microscopic slides with lactophenol blue cotton solution and the conidia, conidiophores and hyphae were assessed by optical microscopy (400×, Observer Z 1—Carl Zeiss Jena, Germany). The images were captured with HDCE-X5 camera (Carton Optical Industries Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and ScopImage 9.0 software (Lawlogix, Phoenix, AZ, USA).

2.3. Molecular Identification of Fusarium spp.

Molecular identification of Fusarium species complex and species were performed by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ribosomal DNA [29] and the elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1α) gene, respectively [30]. Mycelia were produced by inoculating microconidia of clinical isolates into Sabouraud–dextrose broth media and incubated at 28 °C at 120 rpm (MAX Q 4000 Benchtop Orbital Shaker Incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 3 days. Genomic DNA was extracted from the mycelia as previously described elsewhere [31].
The polymerase chain reactions (PCR) amplifications were carried out with TransTaq® DNA Polymerase High Fidelity (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and primers ITS1 (5′ TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G 3′) and ITS4 (5′ TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC 3′) [29]; and EF-1α forward (5′ ATG GGT AAG GA(A/G) GAC AAG AC 3′) and EF-1α reverse (5′ GGA (G/A)GT ACC AGT (G/C)AT CAT GTT-3’) [30]. Purified PCR products were sequenced with the respective primers in ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Life Technologies–Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).
Sequences were analyzed and compared with GenBank database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The evolutionary historical phylogenetic analysis was inferred by the unweighted-pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) with the concatenated sequences ITS and EF-1α that generated a dendrogram based on p-distance. Phylogenetic analyzes were performed using the MEGA 6.0 software (www.megasoftware.net/). The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method.

2.4. MALDI-TOF MS Identification of Fusarium spp.

MALDI-TOF MS analysis was developed as previously described elsewhere [30] with modifications. Briefly, microconidia of Fusarium spp. clinical isolates were inoculated on PDA medium (Acumedia, Lansing, MI, USA) and incubated at 28 °C for 5 days. The fungal cells were transferred to 1.5-mL microtubes containing 500 µL of ethanol 70% (v/v) (Merk KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and glass beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).
Microtubes were vortexed for 5 min and sonicated for 10 min twice to break down the fungal cell wall and exposing the proteins. Each sample (1 µL) was transferred to the surface of stainless steel MALDI sample plate (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) and air dried. Once dry, MALDI-TOF alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution (1 µL) (CHCA, Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) saturated in a solution with 33% (v/v) ethanol, 33% (v/v) acetonitrile, 31% (v/v) H2O and 3% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid was gently mixed to each sample on stainless steel MALDI sample plate and air-dried again. Mass spectra were obtained by a MALDI-TOF MS Autoflex Speed (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with a smart beam laser source (355 nm). All samples were deposited in duplicate on the stainless steel MALDI sample plate.
Analyzes were performed in linear and positive modes. Each spectrum was collected as an average of 1200 laser shots with enough energy to produce good spectra without saturation in the range of m/z from 2000 to 10,000 Da. Before analyzes, the equipment was externally calibrated with the protein calibration standard I (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) containing insulin, ubiquitin, cytochrome C, and myoglobin. Fungal identification and statistical clustering were carried out with the software MALDI Biotyper Compass 4.1 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) in the range of m/z 2000 to 20,000.
The acquired spectra were compared with those spectra archived in the software library for filamentous fungi of MALDI Biotyper Compass 4.1 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Results of fungal identification were presented as logarithmic scores between 0.000 and 3.000. Scores above 1.700 were considered high similarity. The similarity between each Fusarium spp. clinical isolate spectrum is expressed as relative or absolute matching of the mass signal. Dendrogram of spectral similarity were finally obtained by agglomerative clustering algorithm with the software MALDI Biotyper Compass 4.1 (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).

3. Results

A total of 108 Fusarium clinical strains were identified based on classical (macro- and micromorphology), molecular, and MALDI-TOF MS methods. Regarding the macromorpholological features, the colonies colors were yellow, orange, beige, dark purple or lilac. The micromorphological structures were conidiophores arising from septaded hyaline hyphae and abundant macroconidia which presented straight, with parallel walls, and variable septation. Based on these results, all isolates were identified within the Fusarium genus.
Based on the results of ITS region sequencing it was possible to identify the 108 clinical isolates into four different Fusarium species complexes. FSSC is the most abundant with 97 (89.8%) clinical isolates, followed by FOSC with 9 (8.3%) clinical isolates, and FDSC and FFSC with 1 (0.9%) and 1 (0.9%) clinical isolates, respectively (Table 1 and Table S1). Fusarium species were determined by the sequencing of EF-1α gene.
Among FSSC clinical isolates are F. keratoplasticum (58; 59.7%), F. solani (28; 28.8%), F. falciforme (9; 9.2%), and F. petroliphilum (2; 2.0%) (Figure 1). In the FOSC, all clinical isolates (n = 9) are F. oxysporum, whereas in FFSC (n = 1) and FDSC (n = 1) the clinical isolates are F. proliferatum and F. delphinoides, respectively. In addition, the evolutionary relationship among the clinical isolates is shown in the Figure 2. The UPGMA tree obtained by the concatenation of ITS and EF-1α sequences split the 108 clinical isolates into 2 different clades. All FSSC plus FDSC were grouped in the same clade and all FOSC plus FFSC in another same group (Figure 2).
Based on the results of MALDI-TOF MS analysis it was possible to identify 102 out of 108 Fusarium spp. clinical isolates. Ninety-three (86.2%) clinical isolates were identified within the FSSC, 7 (6.5%) within the FOSC, 1 (0.9%) within the FFSC, 1 (0.9%) within the FDSC, and 6 (5.5%) were not identified (Table 1 and Table S1). Overall, five different mass spectra profiles were observed for F. solani species complex clinical isolates and three different mass spectra profiles for F. oxysporum species complex clinical isolates (Figure 3).
MALDI-TOF spectral clustering grouped FOSC and FFSC clinical isolates into the same clade (Figure 4). In a different clade are grouped together all FOSC clinical isolates, 4 FSSC clinical isolates (LMC7189.01, LMC7154.01, LMC7123.01, and LMC7207.01) and 1 FDSC clinical isolate (LMC7215.01). The other FSSC clinical isolates were clustered in six different clades (Figure 2).
Analysis by molecular sequencing (ITS region and EF-1α) led to the identification of 98 (100%) clinical isolates as FSSC (Table 1), whereas analysis by MALDI-TOF MS led to the identification of 91 (92.8%) clinical isolates as FSSC. Among 7 clinical isolates identified as FSSC by ITS sequencing, 2 clinical isolates were identified as F. oxysporum by MALDI-TOF MS and others 5 clinical isolates were not identified (Table 1 and Table S1).
Among the FOSC clinical isolates, based on the ITS region sequencing it was possible to identify 8 clinical isolates, where 4 (57.1%) matched with MALDI-TOF MS results. However, 3 clinical isolates of FOSC were identified only by MALDI-TOF MS (Table 1). For FFSC and FDSC, both methodologies matched the same clinical isolate identification. Six clinical isolates (2 FOSC and 4 FSSC) were not identified by MALDI-TOF MS (Table 1 and Table S1). Overall, comparing both techniques, molecular sequencing was more reliable than the MALDI-TOF technique.

4. Discussion

Fusarium is a large and diverse fungal genus with great importance in agriculture, human health, and economy. The species are high mycotoxin producers and pathogens to plants and humans [32,33]. Fusarium spp. is the second filamentous fungi causative agent of infection in humans after Aspergillus spp. The mortality prognosis of disseminated fusariosis is ~80% [17].
MALDI-TOF MS is a rapid spectral technique and is listed as an alternative method to identify fungi. It is based on fingerprinting of large organic molecules (e.g., ribosomal proteins) that identifies the fungal species at specific spectral level [20,23,25]. Until now, few studies have been published with regard to the identification of a collection of clinical isolates of Fusarium species complex by both MALDI-TOF MS and molecular methods [34,35,36]. The present study is the first comprehensive report for Fusarium species complex clinical isolates based on phenotypic features, phylogenetic analyses, and proteomic profile by MALDI-TOF MS of clinical strains isolated across the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
The performance of MALDI-TOF MS identification compared with classical and molecular methods was evaluated. A total of 108 clinical isolates were included in this investigation. According to the classical method (macro and micromorphology) it was possible to identify all clinical isolates into the genus Fusarium. The classical method (macro and micromorphology) is commonly employed as the preliminary methodology for Fusarium spp. identification. However, it is usually time-consuming and restricted by the unpredictable and subjective character of phenotypic features, which are immediately affected by culture conditions [21].
Besides classical methods, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nucleotide sequence analysis is an identification tool for fungi. Molecular techniques are the most frequently identification methods because of species specificity of this region. The technique is known to provide good resolution at the sub-species level, and thus sequence analysis is a superior choice for phylogeny in Fusarium species complexes [13,36,37].
Due to the specificity of Fusarium species complex, the sequencing of ITS region of rDNA is most frequently studied to identify Fusarium spp. clinical isolates. In addition, ITS sequencing is known to provide good resolution and a superior choice for phylogenetic studies in the species complex [13,37,38,39]. However, the high-throughput sequencing of Fusarium spp. communities has been limited by the lack of primers for genus-specific targeting regions with high discriminatory power at the species level [40]. As a matter of consequence, the identification based on the sequencing of ITS region and others regions, such as EF-1α, has provided an alternative approach for higher detection and identification of Fusarium spp. [41,42,43].
In the present study, sequencing of ITS region identified Fusarium spp. clinical isolates into 4 different Fusarium species complex. Most of the clinical isolates were identified within the FSSC (97; 89.8%) and the remaining clinical isolates were divided within the FOSC (9; 8.3%), FFSC (1; 0.9%), and FDSC (1; 0.9%). The EF-1α is another gene which facilitates the identification of fungal species based on DNA sequencing. Here, EF-1α gene identified the 7 species F. keratoplasticum, F. solani, F. falciforme, F. petroliphilum, F. oxysporum, F. proliferatum, and F. delphinoides.
To improve the correct identification, the sequences of Fusarium spp. genes are available in databases such as Fusarium-ID (http://isolate.fusariumdb.org/blast.php) and Fusarium MLST Database (www.westerdijkinstitute.nl/fusarium) [40,44].
Molecular biology is recognized as the gold standard method for fungal identification [44,45], but it takes about 4 days in the clinical routine laboratory setting. Moreover, it is also considered expensive and needs skilled microbiologists [45,46]. On the other hand, MALDI-TOF MS is a fast spectral technique and is listed as a suitable method to identify fungi [20,25,47]. Thus, in this study, the identification of the clinical isolates by this faster method was proceeded.
According to MALDI-TOF MS results, 94.4% (n = 102) of the clinical isolates were identified at species complex level. Among the identified clinical isolates, MALDI-TOF MS was able to identified 2 clinical isolates at species level, F. proliferatum (FFSC) and F. dimerum (FDSC). However, results obtained from MALDI-TOF MS showed divergences when compared with results obtained from ITS sequencing method.
Among 102 clinical isolates identified by MALDI-TOF MS, three were identified within the FOSC, while by ITS sequence these isolates were identified within the FSSC; and two isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF within the FSSC, whereas by ITS sequence these isolates were identified within the FOSC.
In conclusion, in the present study, 97 (89.9%) out of 108 clinical isolates were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF MS; whereas 5 clinical isolates (4.6%) were misidentified by this spectral technique and 6 clinical isolates (5.5%) were not identified. In addition, MALDI-TOF MS was not able to discriminate the species of FSSC.
MALDI-TOF MS divergences in fungal identification and its inability to discriminate the species of FSSC are attributed to the limited database currently provided by the MALDI-TOF MS manufacturers [48,49]. However, these divergences in strain matching are compensated by the low cost and speed in obtaining results [45,46,48]. Fusarium species complexes are diverse and different environmental condition can alter the metabolic pathways and rearranging the biosynthetic mechanisms in order to protect themselves against cell damage and death. Due to this, it presents high plasticity of gene regulation and expression which alter the pattern of the spectral mass [41,47,50,51,52], which makes this analysis more complex and requires more detailed spectra stored in databases.
Identification of Fusarium genus by MALDI-TOF MS is not yet accurately investigated due to low number of representative taxa in databases [32,53]. Our study identified 12 different spectral mass patterns, from which six within the FSSC and four within the FOSC. This result shows how diverse is this fungal genus and the importance in registering in the database different spectral mass patterns of the same species isolated from different geographical regions and submitted to different growth conditions [32].
In the present study, the MALDI-TOF technique was not able to discriminate the whole evaluated fungal species of the FSSC. In contrast, a previous study Oliveira and collaborators [32] successfully identified species of the clinical fungal genus Sporothrix by MALDI-TOF MS. The authors have established an accurate in-house MALDI-TOF spectral database, which is comprehensive in terms of Sporothrix MALDI-TOF spectra number and geographical distribution of strain origins. Moreover, all reference spectra available in the mentioned in-house database were previously validated by molecular biology analysis.
This effort in the build-up of an in-house database is substantial and worthwhile. Matos and collaborators [54] have further used the same above mentioned in-house database for the identification by MALDI-TOF MS of a Sporothrix brasiliensis strain isolated from a subconjunctival infiltrative lesion in immunocompetent patient. According to the authors, MALDI-TOF MS technique was as good as the partial sequence of genes (calmodulin, beta-tubulin and chitin synthase, for example) for the identification of S. brasiliensis.
Based on the information obtained in the present study, and evaluating the information available for identification of other fungal taxonomic group by MALDI-TOF MS [32,54], it is possible to understand that MALDI-TOF limitation in identifying species of the FSSC is mainly because this analytical technique requires a more accurate and larger database for fungal identification.
Establishing an in-house database is a good way to overcome the limitation associated with using MALDI-TOF MS in fungal identification. For future studies on clinical Fusarium identification by MALDI-TOF MS, the data generated here can be used in the establishment of an accurate in-house MALDI-TOF spectral database.

5. Conclusions

This work is the first comprehensive report for populations based on the phenotypic analyses, proteomic profile by MALDI-TOF, and phylogenetic analyses of Fusarium species complex isolated from clinical cases in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil. FSSC was the most frequent Fusarium clinical complex in Sao Paulo State, followed by FOSC, FDSC, and FFSC. The results of ITS region sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS mass spectra led to the identification and grouping of most Fusarium clinical strains at species complex. MALDI-TOF MS identification has shown 89.8% concordance with molecular methods, highlighting its potential on filamentous fungi identification as a fast and cost-efficient alternative; however, MALDI-TOF MS requires a more accurate and larger database.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/1/66/s1.

Author Contributions

Research conceptualization, M.R.v.Z.K. and C.S.; Investigation, M.H.P.; Writing the first draft of the manuscript M.H.P, C.S., and M.R.v.Z.K.; Molecular analysis, M.H.P and L.T.C.; Collection and supply of microbial strains, M.d.S.C.M., M.T.G.d.A., M.E.N.B.d.S., and R.M.; All authors edited the manuscript and approved the final draft of the manuscript; Funding acquisition, C.S. and M.R.v.Z.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de São Paulo—FAPESP, grant number 2017/25300-8. This work was partially funded by the Universidad de La Frontera (Temuco, Chile) through the Project DIUFRO PIA19-0001.

Acknowledgments

MALDI-TOF MS analyses were developed using an equipment funded by CONICYT/Chile through the project Fondequip EQM160054 2016.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Nelson, P.E.; Dignani, M.C.; Anaissie, E.J. Taxonomy, biology, and clinical aspects of Fusarium species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 7, 479–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nucci, M.; Marr, K.A.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Martins, C.A.; Trabasso, P.; Costa, S.; Voltarelli, J.C.; Colombo, A.L.; Imhof, A.; Pasquini, R.; et al. Fusarium infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 38, 1237–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dignania, M.C.; Anaissie, E. Human fusariosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2004, 1, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Czislowski, E.; Fraser-Smith, S.; Zander, M.; O’Neill, W.T.; Meldrum, R.A.; Tran-Nguyen, L.T.T.; Batley, J.; Aitken, E.A.B. Investigation of the diversity of effector genes in the banana pathogen, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense, reveals evidence of horizontal gene transfer. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 1155–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Liu, S.; Wu, B.; Lv, S.; Shen, Z.; Li, R.; Yi, G.; Li, C.; Guo, X. Genetic diversity in FUB genes of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense suggests horizontal gene transfer. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chang, S.; Carneiro-Leão, M.P.; Oliveira, B.F.; Souza-Motta, C.; Lima, N.; Santos, C.; Oliveira, N.T. Polyphasic approach including MALDI-TOF MS/MS analysis for identification and characterisation of Fusarium verticillioides in brazilian corn kernels. Toxins 2016, 54, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rojas, E.C.; Sapkota, R.; Jensen, B.; Jørgensen, H.J.L.; Henriksson, T.; Jørgensen, L.N. Fusarium head blight modifies fungal endophytic communities during infection of wheat spikes. Microb. Ecol. 2019, 78, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Sun, S.; Lui, Q.; Han, L.; Ma, Q.; He, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, L. Identification and characterization of Fusarium proliferatum, a new species of fungi that cause fungal keratitis. Sci. Rep. 2018, 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Syakalima, M.; Ramatla, T.; Lubanza, N. Opportunistic pathogenic fungi isolated from feces of feral pigeons in mafikeng north west province of South Africa. Vet. World 2019, 12, 1066–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Galimberti, R.; Torre, A.C.; Baztán, M.C.; Rodriguez-Chiappetta, F. Emerging systemic fungal infections. Clin. Dermatol. 2012, 30, 633–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muhammed, M.; Anagnostou, T.; Desalermos, A.; Kourkoumpetis, T.K.; Carneiro, H.A.; Glavis-Bloom, J.; Coleman, J.J.; Mylonakis, E. Fusarium infection: Report of 26 cases and review of 97 cases from the literature. Medicine 2013, 92, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Walther, G.; Stasch, S.; Kaerger, K.; Hamprecht, A.; Roth, M.; Cornely, O.A.; Geerling, G.; Mackenzie, C.R.; Kurzai, O.; von Lilienfeld-Toal, M. Fusarium keratitis in germany. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 2983–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Delia, M.; Monno, R.; Giannelli, G.; Ianora, A.A.; Dalfino, L.; Pastore, D. Fusariosis in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia: A case report and review of the literature. Mycopath 2016, 181, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gaviria-Rivera, A.; Giraldo-López, A.; Santa-Cardona, C.; Cano-Restrepo, L. Molecular identification of clinical isolates of Fusarium in Colombia. Rev. Salud. Pública 2018, 20, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nucci, M.D.; Anaissie, M.D. Treatment and prevention of Fusarium infection. Uptodate 2019, 20, 695–704. [Google Scholar]
  16. van Diepeningen, A.D.; Brankovics, B.; Iltes, J.; van der Lee, T.A.; Waalwijk, C. Diagnosis of Fusarium infections: Approaches to identification by the clinical mycology laboratory. Diagn. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2015, 9, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Al-Hatmi, A.M.; Meis, J.F.; de Hoog, G.S. Fusarium: Molecular diversity and intrinsic drug resistance. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lobatón-Ramírez, J.; Coronado-Negrete, A.; Ramírez-Barranco, R.; Rocha-Reyes, E.; Pinto-Angarita, J.C.; Borré-Naranjo, D. Fusariosis diseminada por Fusarium verticillioides en un paciente con leucemia mieloide aguda. Rev. Cienc. Biomed. 2017, 7, 316–322. [Google Scholar]
  19. The Fusarium Laboratory Manual. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470278376 (accessed on 27 September 2019).
  20. Alsohaili, S.A.; Bani-Hasan, B.M. Morphological and Molecular identification of fungi Isolated from different environmental sources in the Northern Eastern Desert of Jordan. Jordan J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 3, 329–337. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hibbett, D.; Abarenkov, K.; Kõljalg, U.; Öpik, M.; Chai, B.; Cole, J.; Wang, Q.; Crous, P.; Robert, V.; Helgason, T.; et al. Sequence-based classification and identification of fungi. Mycologia 2016, 108, 1049–1068. [Google Scholar]
  22. Norlia, M.; Jinap, S.; Nor-Khaizura, M.A.R.; Son, R.; Chin, C.K.; Sardjono, C. Polyphasic approach to the identification and characterization of aflatoxigenic strains of Aspergillus section Flavi isolated from peanuts and peanut-based products marketed in Malaysia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 282, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodriguez, R.; Santos, C.; Simões, M.F.; Soares, C.; Santos, C.; Lima, N. Polyphasic, including MALDI-TOF MS, evaluation of freeze-drying long-term preservation on Aspergillus (section Nigri) strains. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 291–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Santos, C.; Paterson, R.R.; Venâncio, A.; Lima, N. Filamentous fungal characterizations by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 108, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Rodrigues, P.; Santos, C.; Venancio, A.; Lima, N. Species identification of Aspergillus section Flavi isolates from Portuguese almonds using phenotypic, including MALDI-TOF ICMS, and molecular approaches. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 111, 877–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nicolau, A.; Sequeira, L.; Santos, C.; Mota, M. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) applied to diatom identification: Influence of culturing age. Aquat. Biol. 2018, 20, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Caputo, P.; Di Martino, M.C.; Perfetto, B.; Iovino, F.; Donnarumma, G. Use of MALDI-TOF MS to Discriminate between Biofilm-Producer and Non-Producer Strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bizzini, A.; Greub, G. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, a revolution in clinical microbial identification. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 1614–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal. RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, 1st ed.; Innis, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  30. Silva, F.P.; Vechiato, M.H.; Harakava, R. EF-1α gene and IGS rDNA sequencing of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum and F. oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli reveals polyphyletic origin of strains. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 1614–1619. [Google Scholar]
  31. Junghans, H.; Metzlaff, M. A simple and rapid method for the preparation of total plant DNA. Biotechniques 1990, 2, 176. [Google Scholar]
  32. Oliveira, M.M.E.; Santos, C.; Sampaio, P.; Romeo, O.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Pais, C.; Lima, N.; Zancope-Oliveira, R.M. Development and optimization of a new MALDI-TOF protocol for identification of the Sporothrix species complex. Res. Microbiol. 2015, 66, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Paziani, M.H.; Tonani, L.; de Menezes, H.D.; Bachmann, L.; Wainwright, M.; Braga, G.L.; Kress, M.R.Z. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with phenothiazinium photosensitizers in non-vertebrate model Galleria mellonella infected with Fusarium keratoplasticum and Fusarium moniliforme. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2019, 25, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Triest, D.; Stubbe, D.; De Cremer, K.; Piérard, D.; Normand, A.C.; Piarroux, R.; Detandt, M.; Hendrickx, M. Use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of molds of the Fusarium genus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sleiman, S.; Halliday, C.L.; Chapman, B.; Brown, M.; Nitschke, J.; Lau, A.F.; Chen, S.C. Performance of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption IonizationTime of Flight Mass Spectrometry for Identification of Aspergillus, Scedosporium, and Fusarium spp. in the Australian Clinical Setting. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 2182–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Marinach-Patrice, C.; Lethuillier, A.; Marly, A.; Brossas, J.Y.; Gené, J.; Symoens, F.; Datry, A.; Guarro, J.; Mazier, D.; Hennequin, C. Use of mass spectrometry to identify clinical Fusarium isolates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 634–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Magdama, F.; Monserrate-Maggi, L.; Serrano, L.; Sosa, D.; Geiser, D.M.; Jiménez-Gasco, M.D.M. Comparative analysis uncovers the limitations of current molecular detection methods for Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4 strains. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zheng, S.J.; García-Bastidas, F.A.; Li, X.; Zeng, L.; Bai, T.; Xu, S. New Geographical Insights of the Latest Expansion of of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cubense Tropical Race 4 Into the Greater Mekong Subregion. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. O’Donnell, K.; Sutton, D.; Fothergill, A.; McCarthy, D.; Rinaldi, M.; Brandt, M. Molecular phylogenetic diversity, multilocus haplotype nomenclature, and in vitro antifungal resistance within the Fusarium solani species complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 2477–2490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Karlsson, I.; Edel-Hermann, V.; Gautheron, N.; Durling, M.B.; Kolseth, A.K.; Steinberg, C.; Persson, P.; Friberg, A. Genus-Specific Primers for Study of Fusarium Communities in Field Samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 491–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Geiser, D.M.; Jimenez-Gasco, M.D.; Kang, S.C.; Makalowska, I.; Veeraraghavan, N.; Ward, T.J.; Zhang, N.; Kuldau, G.A.; O’Donnell, K. Fusarium-ID: V. 1.0: A DNA sequence database for identifying Fusarium. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2004, 110, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Migliorini, P.; Milanesi, P.M.; Mezzomo, R.; Maciel, C.G.; Muniz, M.F. Fusarium solani and F. oxysporum: Etiological agents of damping off in crambe. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Agrár. 2018, 13, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lira, L.V.; Santos, A.C.S.; Tiago, P.V.; Oliveira, V.T.; Moura, R.M. Hiperparasitismo de Fusarium spp. em Austropuccinia psidii em Jambo-do-Pará. Summa Phytopathol. 2019, 45, 204–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Boutigny, A.L.; Gautier, A.; Basler, R.; Dauthieux, F.; Leite, S.; Valade, R. Metabarcoding targeting the EF1 alpha region to assess Fusarium diversity on cereals. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0207988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Singha, L.; Anderson, J.A.; Chen, J.; Gill, B.S.; Tiwari, V.K.; Rawat, N. Development and Validation of a Perfect KASP Marker for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance Gene. Plant. Pathol. J. 2019, 35, 200–207. [Google Scholar]
  46. Perlin, D.S.; Rautemaa-Richardson, R.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. The global problem of antifungal resistance: Prevalence, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wickes, B.L.; Wiederhold, N.P. Molecular diagnostics in medical mycology. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Reeve, M.A.; Stewart, S.; Ryan, M.J. MALDI-TOF MS spectral variation is observed between fungal samples grown under identical conditions after long-term storage by cryopreservation freeze-drying, and under oil. Cryoletters 2019, 40, 145–151. [Google Scholar]
  49. Packeu, A.; Hendrickx, M.; Beguin, H.; Martiny, D.; Vandenberg, O.; Detandt, M. Identification of the Trichophyton mentagrophytes complex species using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Rychert, J.; Slechta, E.S.; Barker, A.P.; Miranda, E.; Babady, N.E.; Tang, Y.W. Multicenter Evaluation of the Vitek MS v3.0 System for the Identification of Filamentous Fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. López-Maury, L.; Marguerat, S.; Bähler, J. Tuning gene expression to changing environments: From rapid responses to evolutionary adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 583–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rizzato, C.; Lombardi, L.; Zoppo, M.; Lupetti, A.; Tavanti, A. Pushing the limits of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: Beyond fungal species identification. J. Fungi 2015, 1, 367–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Santos, C.R.; Francisco, E.; Mazza, M.; Padovan, A.C.B.; Colombo, A.; Lima, N. Impact of MALDI-TOF MS in clinical mycology; Progress and barriers in diagnostics. In MALDI-TOF and Tandem MS for Clinical Microbiology, 1st ed.; Shah, H.N., Gharbia, S.E., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: London, UK, 2017; pp. 211–230. [Google Scholar]
  54. Matos, A.M.F.; Moreira, L.M.; Barczewski, B.F.; de Matos, L.X.; de Oliveira, J.B.V.; Pimentel, M.I.F.; Almeida-Paes, R.; Oliveira, M.G.; Pinto, T.C.A.; Lima, N.; et al. Identification by MALDI-TOF MS of Sporothrix brasiliensis isolated from a subconjunctival infiltrative lesion in immunocompetent patient. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 00066 g001 550
Figure 1. Graphical summary of molecular (ITS and EF-1α) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identification of Fusarium species complexes clinical isolates (n = 108). (A) ITS sequencing identification. (B) Fusarium species of FSSC (sequencing of EF-1α). (C) MALDI-TOF MS identification. FSSC: Fusarium solani species complex; FOSC: F. oxysporum species complex; FFSC: F. fujikuroi species complex; FDSC: F. dimerum species complex.
Figure 1. Graphical summary of molecular (ITS and EF-1α) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identification of Fusarium species complexes clinical isolates (n = 108). (A) ITS sequencing identification. (B) Fusarium species of FSSC (sequencing of EF-1α). (C) MALDI-TOF MS identification. FSSC: Fusarium solani species complex; FOSC: F. oxysporum species complex; FFSC: F. fujikuroi species complex; FDSC: F. dimerum species complex.
Microorganisms 08 00066 g001
Microorganisms 08 00066 g002 550
Figure 2. Dendrogram based on concatenated sequences of ITS and EF-1α from 108 Fusarium spp. clinical isolates. In the tree nodes are the percentage of the bootstrap. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site. FSSC: Fusarium solani species complex; FOSC: F. oxysporum species complex; FFSC: F. fujikuroi species complex; FDSC: F. dimerum species complex. Outgroup: Cylindrocarpon cylindroides strain CBS 324.61.
Figure 2. Dendrogram based on concatenated sequences of ITS and EF-1α from 108 Fusarium spp. clinical isolates. In the tree nodes are the percentage of the bootstrap. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitutions per site. FSSC: Fusarium solani species complex; FOSC: F. oxysporum species complex; FFSC: F. fujikuroi species complex; FDSC: F. dimerum species complex. Outgroup: Cylindrocarpon cylindroides strain CBS 324.61.
Microorganisms 08 00066 g002
Microorganisms 08 00066 g003 550
Figure 3. Main MALDI-TOF mass spectra profiles for Fusarium species complexes. (A) FSSC strain spectrum (F. keratoplasticum—ATCC 36031); (B) FOSC strain spectrum (F. oxysporum—ATCC 48112); (C–G) FSSC clinical isolates spectra; (H–J) FOSC clinical isolates spectra; (K) FFSC clinical isolate spectrum; (L) FDSC clinical isolate spectrum. At the right of the panel is indicated the ID of each strain and/or clinical isolate. Spectra are presented in the range from 2000 to 10,000 Da, where the main mass peaks are observed.
Figure 3. Main MALDI-TOF mass spectra profiles for Fusarium species complexes. (A) FSSC strain spectrum (F. keratoplasticum—ATCC 36031); (B) FOSC strain spectrum (F. oxysporum—ATCC 48112); (C–G) FSSC clinical isolates spectra; (H–J) FOSC clinical isolates spectra; (K) FFSC clinical isolate spectrum; (L) FDSC clinical isolate spectrum. At the right of the panel is indicated the ID of each strain and/or clinical isolate. Spectra are presented in the range from 2000 to 10,000 Da, where the main mass peaks are observed.
Microorganisms 08 00066 g003
Microorganisms 08 00066 g004 550
Figure 4. Phenotypic dendrogram based on MALDI-TOF MS spectra, obtained in the range from 2000 to 20,000, for Fusarium species complexes. Dendrogram of spectral similarity were obtained by agglomerative clustering algorithm with the software MALDI Biotyper Compass 4.1. C to G—mass spectra profiles of FSSC clinical isolates and control strain.
Figure 4. Phenotypic dendrogram based on MALDI-TOF MS spectra, obtained in the range from 2000 to 20,000, for Fusarium species complexes. Dendrogram of spectral similarity were obtained by agglomerative clustering algorithm with the software MALDI Biotyper Compass 4.1. C to G—mass spectra profiles of FSSC clinical isolates and control strain.
Microorganisms 08 00066 g004
Table
Table 1. Molecular method (ITS and EF-1α sequencing) and MALDI-TOF MS identification of the 108 Fusarium spp. clinical isolates
Table 1. Molecular method (ITS and EF-1α sequencing) and MALDI-TOF MS identification of the 108 Fusarium spp. clinical isolates
MethodFSSC% FOSC% FFSC% FDSC% No ID% Total%
Molecular9789.898.310.910.900108100.0
MALDI TOF MS9386.176.510.910.965.6108100.0
FSSC: Fusarium solani species complex; FOSC: F. oxysporum species complex; FFSC: F. fujikuroi species complex; FDSC: F. dimerum species complex; No ID: no identification.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Paziani, M.H.; Tonani Carvalho, L.; Melhem, M.d.S.C.; Almeida, M.T.G.d.; Nadaletto Bonifácio da Silva, M.E.; Martinez, R.; Santos, C.; von Zeska Kress, M.R. First Comprehensive Report of Clinical Fusarium Strains Isolated in the State of Sao Paulo (Brazil) and Identified by MALDI-TOF MS and Molecular Biology. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010066

AMA Style

Paziani MH, Tonani Carvalho L, Melhem MdSC, Almeida MTGd, Nadaletto Bonifácio da Silva ME, Martinez R, Santos C, von Zeska Kress MR. First Comprehensive Report of Clinical Fusarium Strains Isolated in the State of Sao Paulo (Brazil) and Identified by MALDI-TOF MS and Molecular Biology. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(1):66. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010066

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paziani, Mario Henrique, Ludmilla Tonani Carvalho, Marcia de Souza Carvalho Melhem, Margarete Teresa Gottardo de Almeida, Maria Emilia Nadaletto Bonifácio da Silva, Roberto Martinez, Cledir Santos, and Marcia Regina von Zeska Kress. 2020. "First Comprehensive Report of Clinical Fusarium Strains Isolated in the State of Sao Paulo (Brazil) and Identified by MALDI-TOF MS and Molecular Biology" Microorganisms 8, no. 1: 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8010066

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop