Next Article in Journal
Fungal and Bacterial Microbiome Associated with the Rhizosphere of Native Plants from the Atacama Desert
Next Article in Special Issue
High Throughput Sediment DNA Sequencing Reveals Azo Dye Degrading Bacteria Inhabit Nearshore Sediments
Previous Article in Journal
The Root Nodule Microbiome of Cultivated and Wild Halophytic Legumes Showed Similar Diversity but Distinct Community Structure in Yellow River Delta Saline Soils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Haloglomus irregulare gen. nov., sp. nov., a New Halophilic Archaeon Isolated from a Marine Saltern
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/microorganisms8020208
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aquatic Thermal Reservoirs of Microbial Life in a Remote and Extreme High Andean Hydrothermal System

by
Vilma Pérez
1,2,
Johanna Cortés
1,3,
Francisca Marchant
3,
Cristina Dorador
3,4,
Verónica Molina
5,
Marcela Cornejo-D’Ottone
6,
Klaudia Hernández
7,
Wade Jeffrey
8,
Sergio Barahona
4,9 and
Martha B. Hengst
1,3,*
1
Laboratorio de Ecologia Molecular y Microbiologia Aplicada, Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
2
Australian Centre for Ancient DNA (ACAD), University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
3
Centro de Biotecnología y Bioingeniería (CeBiB), Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile
4
Laboratorio de Complejidad Microbiana y Ecología Funcional, Instituto Antofagasta & Departamento de Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
5
Observatorio de Ecología Microbiana, Departamento de Biología Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Exactas, Universidad de Playa Ancha, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile
6
Escuela de Ciencias del Mar & Instituto Milenio de Oceanografía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile
7
Centro de Investigación Marina Quintay CIMARQ, Facultad de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8320000, Chile
8
Center for Environmental Diagnostics & Bioremediation, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL 32514, USA
9
Laboratorio de Microbiología Aplicada y Extremófilos, Universidad Católica del Norte, Antofagasta 1240000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(2), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020208
Submission received: 10 December 2019 / Revised: 29 January 2020 / Accepted: 31 January 2020 / Published: 3 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Diversity in Extreme Environments)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrothermal systems are ideal to understand how microbial communities cope with challenging conditions. Lirima, our study site, is a polyextreme, high-altitude, hydrothermal ecosystem located in the Chilean Andean highlands. Herein, we analyze the benthic communities of three nearby springs in a gradient of temperature (42–72 °C represented by stations P42, P53, and P72) and pH, and we characterize their microbial diversity by using bacteria 16S rRNA (V4) gene metabarcoding and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries (bacteria and archaea). Bacterial clone libraries of P42 and P53 springs showed that the community composition was mainly represented by phototrophic bacteria (Chlorobia, 3%, Cyanobacteria 3%, at P42; Chlorobia 5%, and Chloroflexi 5% at P53), Firmicutes (32% at P42 and 43% at P53) and Gammaproteobacteria (13% at P42 and 29% at P53). Furthermore, bacterial communities that were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding were characterized by an overall predominance of Chloroflexi in springs with lower temperatures (33% at P42), followed by Firmicutes in hotter springs (50% at P72). The archaeal diversity of P42 and P53 were represented by taxa belonging to Crenarchaeota, Diapherotrites, Nanoarchaeota, Hadesarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, and Euryarchaeota. The microbial diversity of the Lirima hydrothermal system is represented by groups from deep branches of the tree of life, suggesting this ecosystem as a reservoir of primitive life and a key system to study the processes that shaped the evolution of the biosphere.

1. Introduction

Early Earth was characterized by high temperatures in primitive oceans, high UV radiation, low oxygen concentrations, acidic pH, intensive volcanic activity, and a reduced atmosphere with high hydrogen concentrations [1,2,3]. One of the theories about the origin of primary life proposes that it may have occurred in thermal environments such as deep-sea hydrothermal vents [4,5], and the common ancestor of life (LUCA) was probably a chemolithoautotrophic, thermophilic, and anaerobic organism [6,7]. Therefore, the study of modern hydrothermal ecosystems could provide a better comprehension about the evolution of earliest life in the primitive atmosphere [8].
High altitude ecosystems around the Atacama Desert contain several hot springs that are characterized by extreme environmental factors such as those encountered in early earth, presenting extreme aridity, high UV radiation, and a wide daily temperature oscillation. The geochemical composition of the water has been reported to be dominated by sodium sulfate, chloride, and arsenic [9]. These unique environmental and geochemical conditions create peculiar niches for microbial life that are potentially similar to early Earth. In fact, hot springs have been reported to be microbial-dominated ecosystems, supporting a rich microbial diversity and containing several microhabitats that constitute natural niches for thermophilic (>50 °C) and hyperthermophilic (>80 °C) microorganisms, such as archaea and bacteria (and their viruses) [10,11,12]. High-altitude hydrothermal systems represent extremely fragile ecosystems that are often exploited for groundwater uptake and geothermal energy generation in industrial processes such as the mining industry without considering the uniqueness of these environments and the ecosystem services that provides for indigenous communities living here.
The remote Lirima hydrothermal system is located in the north of Chile, 25 km from the Sillaiguay volcanic chain at 4000 m a.s.l., close to the Aroma-Quimchasata volcanic complex (19°51′24″ S, 68°55′02″ W), one of the most tectonically active areas in the world with extensive geothermal and volcanic activity [9,13,14,15]. This environment is surrounded by a mountain desert, and it has been recognized as a complex polyextreme environment for life [16,17,18,19,20]. Microbial communities from Lirima hot springs have not been comprehensively studied. To our knowledge, there is only a single microbial diversity survey based on a culture-dependent approach that identified five bacterial phyla belonging to Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes [21]. Considering the above, we characterize the microbial diversity of three closely located hot springs in the Lirima hydrothermal system by using both 16S rRNA gene clonal (bacteria and archaea) and 16S rRNA (V4 region) gene metabarcoding analyses, and we determine the influence of physical and chemical environmental conditions on those microbial community structures. The results obtained in this study are discussed in the context of how hydrothermal systems are important reservoirs of unexplored microbial diversity and crucial systems to understand essential questions concerning the metabolisms, adaptations, and phylogenetic relationships of these microbial communities with deep branched lineages in the tree of life.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Sampling Sites

Samples for physical, chemical and biological analyses were collected from three permanent pools at the hydrothermal Lirima ecosystem (i.e., P42, P53 (A, B and C), and P72, which were named according to the water temperature) at the end of the dry season and the beginning of the wet season (during April 2011 for the 16S rRNA gene clone libraries and November 2013 for the 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding analysis) (Figure 1; Table 1). P42 is a shallow pool (40 cm depth) that is colonized at the bottom by a thick and compact orange mat. P53 is a deeper (1.5 m) transparent water pool with orange mats growing only at the surface of the external margin. The sediment below the mat is a thin greyish layer. Three sediment samples were analyzed from this pool: P53A (surface, mat), P53B (medium, sediment), P53C (bottom, sediment). P72 is the hottest pool, with dark greyish sediments and a depth of 1.6 m.

2.2. Sample Collection and Physical–Chemical Analysis

Mat and sediment samples were collected in sterile 50 mL Falcon tubes from each pool. Samples for enrichment cultures were stored at 4 °C upon collection until cultured in the laboratory. Samples for molecular analysis were immediately preserved in RNALater (Ambion, Life Technologies, Austin, TX, USA) and stored to 4 °C upon collection until they were processed in the laboratory. Physical and chemical parameters were obtained in situ, with a multiparameter instrument (Hanna HI991301) measuring temperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity, and redox potential (Table 1). Additional discrete water samples were taken during November 2011 for CO2, CH4 and N2O gas analyses (Table S1) and during November 2013 for the chemical characterization of 37 parameters including alkalinity, nutrients (total nitrogen, nitrite, nitrate, sulfate, phosphate, and silicate) and metals, all of which were analyzed by using standard methods (Table S1). The samples for gas determination were taken in 20 mL vials and preserved with 50 µL of saturated HgCl2 to inhibit biological activity, and the samples were then stored in the dark until analysis by the headspace technique of McAullife [22]. The analysis was conducted in a gas chromatograph that was equipped with an electron capture detector (ECD) for N2O determination, a methanizer to convert CO2 to CH4, and an flame ionization detector (FID) to determine CH4 concentration (GC Greenhouse 2014, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

2.3. Enrichment Cultures and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Environmental samples were collected during April 2011. Enrichment cultures of microbial mats and sediment samples were performed to increase the number of cells to detectable levels to determine the presence of microbial communities and their morphologies. For enrichment cultures, one gram of each sample was inoculated into 10 ml of Medio Salar 1% NaCl (0.5 g L−1 casein peptone, 0.2 g L−1 yeast extract, 0.1g L−1 NaCl). The enrichment cultures were incubated for 21 days, without shaking, at specific temperatures that corresponded to those of the sampling sites under aerobic conditions in the dark. The growth cultures were prepared for SEM by dehydration in a graded ethanol series (10–100%) followed by critical point drying. The samples were analyzed with a Scanning Hitachi 3000 SEM (Hitachi, Japan) at the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

2.4. Clonal Analysis of Archaeal and Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene

Environmental samples were collected during April 2011. The mat samples from each site were shaken vigorously and homogenized prior to DNA extraction. For DNA extractions, 0.25 g of homogenized samples were used. All DNA extractions were carried out by using the UltraClean Soil DNA isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and concentration were evaluated by 1% w/v agarose gel electrophoresis and with a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000c, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The amplification of the archaeal 16S rRNA gene was performed by using a nested PCR approach based on that of Jurgens et al. [23] with the primers Ar4F and Un1492R (~1500 bp), and then a second PCR was performed by using this amplicon as template but with the primers Ar3F and Ar9R (~900 bp). Each PCR reaction contained 1× PCR buffer with 3 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 400 µM of deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTP) mixture (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 0.25 pmol of each primer, 1.25U Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 10–100 ng of template DNA and water to a final volume of 25 µL. The PCR conditions used were an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation (30 s at 94 °C), annealing (45 s at 55 °C), and extension (1.5 min at 72 °C).
Bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified by using the primers Eub27F and Eub1542R [24]. Each PCR reaction contained 1× PCR buffer with 3 mM MgCl2 (Promega), 400 µM dNTP mixture (Promega), 0.25 pmol of each primer, 1.25U Taq polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 10–100 ng of template DNA and water to a final volume of 25 µL. Purified amplicons (~1500 bp) were cloned into a pGEMT-Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacture’s protocol. A total of 96 clones per sample were picked, and inserts were amplified with the M13F/R primers. After the screening, a Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) assay was used to select different ribotypes of the clones. For each clone, 20 µL of the amplified insert (1600 bp) was restricted with an HhaI enzyme (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and the product was separated by using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis [25]. Duplicates of each ribotype were reamplified and sequenced in Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) by using the plasmid primers (M13F and M13R) on both sides of the insert. The obtained sequences were manually assembled and edited to resolve ambiguous positions by using ChromasPro software version 2.0.0 (Technelysium Pty Ltda, South Brisbane, Australia). Chimeras were identified by using Decipher [26] and removed prior to further analysis. The assembled sequences were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under the accession number SUB6904016.
The closest relatives of the 16S rRNA sequences were determined by comparison with the SILVA database (SILVA database version 132 [27]) for taxonomic identification with default parameters (Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) at 98% similarity for genus level).

2.5. Bacterial 16S rRNA Gene Metabarcoding Analysis

Environmental samples were collected in November 2013 from P42, P53 (A, B and C) and P72. The samples were shaken vigorously and homogenized prior to DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA was extracted from 0.25 g of samples with a PowerBiofilm DNA Isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality was evaluated by 1% w/v agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at A260/280 nm (1.9–2.0).
The purified DNA from sediment and mats samples was amplified, and the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA were sequenced by using the bacterial primers 515F and 806R [28], which were optimized for the Illumina MiSeq platform. Sequencing was performed at the Research and Testing Laboratory (RTL, Lubbock, TX, USA) on a MiSeq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) by using MiSeq Reagent kit (v2) with the longest read length set to 2 × 250 bp. The raw sequence data were submitted to the NCBI database under the accession number SUB6661100.
From the total reads, PhiX and contaminant reads (e.g., Illumina adapters and barcodes) were removed. Raw sequences were filtered based on quality (Q > 20, p = 80) by FASTX-Toolkit, version 0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). The assembling of reads was performed by using the Paired-End read mergeR (PEAR) assembly algorithm v 0.9.10 [29]. Paired end reads were selected after the quality filter was analyzed by using the open-source MOTHUR software v 1.39.5 [30], including alignment, clustering and dereplication. The sequences with incorrect length (<250 bp or >300 bp) or containing ambiguous bases (>0) and homopolymers (>8) were removed. The remaining sequences were processed by using the standard operating procedure of MOTHUR [31]. The taxonomical classification of each cluster was obtained by using SILVA database (SILVA database version 132) [27] with a confidence threshold of 98%. Unassigned sequences were removed by using the remove.lineage commands. The Ace, Chao1 and Simpson estimators of each sample were calculated by using the DOTUR (Defining Operational Taxonomic Units and Estimating Species Richness) function of MOTHUR. Rarefaction curves were obtained from all the samples with MOTHUR, and these curves were graphed with the R program.
The OTUs were analyzed by using Vegan package version 2.5-4 [32] in R version 3.4.4 (R Core Team, 2017). Community indexes were estimated for diversity (Rarefaction Species richness, Chao 1, Shannon, and Simpson index). Pielou’s evenness and sampling efforts were determined via the rarefaction curve. The coverage was calculated by Good’s method by using the formula [1 − (n/N)] × 100, where n is the number of singletons and N is the total number of reads analyzed [33].
A redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed to identify which environmental factors were driving the structure of microbial community for OTUs that were assigned at the phylum level by using rda function in vegan package in R.

2.6. Early Life Genera and Phylogenetic Analysis

An early life genera analysis was performed to determine the presence of deeply branching microbial groups in microorganisms with similar characteristics to the supposedly common ancestor for life in our data [7].
This analysis was developed by performing a search in our data for genera that had been described in the literature (Bergey’s Manual of Systematic of Archaea and Bacteria) as thermophile or thermotolerant, acidophile or acidotolerant, and anaerobe or facultative anaerobe (Table 2). Later, a phylogenetic analysis was performed by constructing a phylogenetic tree by using the 16S rRNA gene nucleotide sequences of the type strains or uncultured representatives of the genera that were selected for early life analysis. The nucleotide sequences were extracted from the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) (RDP Release 11, Update 5, https://rdp.cme.msu.edu/index.jsp) and SILVA database (SILVA database version 132) [27] (Table S6). Moreover, four archaeal 16S rRNA gene nucleotide sequences (Archaeoglobus profundus, Archaeoglobus veneficuspor, Thermoplasmata, acidophilum, and Thermoproteus tenax) were used in this analysis. Nucleotide sequences were aligned by using MUSCLE (MEGA version 7.0.26). The distance matrix and phylogenetic tree were calculated according to the Tamura–Nei model [34], and maximum likelihood [35] algorithms with one hundred bootstraps were used to assign confidence levels to the nodes of the trees by using MEGA (version 7.0.26) software packages [36].

3. Results and Discussion

The Lirima hydrothermal system is composed of several springs in a physicochemical gradient of temperature (42 to 72 °C) and pH (5.2 to 7.8) (Table 1; Figure 1). The water corresponded to a hyposaline system (<0.89 psu) and low conductivity values (<1875 µS cm-1; Table 1). The temperature gradients were associated with shifts in chemical changes in the water. The high temperature spring (72 °C) was associated with higher bicarbonate, alkalinity, magnesium and fluoride levels compared with <53 °C springs (Table S1). These later springs were characterized by a slightly higher conductivity, as well as slightly higher sulfate, phosphate, and arsenic levels compared to the 72 °C spring. Furthermore, the springs did not present a significant change in the physicochemical parameters through time, maintaining a stability in their temperature, pH, salinity and conductivity in different seasons and even different years of sampling (Table 1). Previous reports have supported our results, showing similar gradients of temperature and pH and a deep circulation from a geothermal reservoir, with a low mixing degree in the Lirima hydrothermal system [14,37]; however, we registered a more acidic pH (5.2) in the hottest spring (P72). Moreover, high concentrations of CO2 (596.4 µM) and CH4 (38,412 nM) in P72 compared to P42 (CO2, 156.9 µM; CH4, 6,123 nM; Table S1) and P53 (CO2, 124.8 µM; CH4, 3,807 nM; Table S1) were measured.
The analyses of the archaeal and bacterial diversity of the microbial mats in the Lirima hot springs that were performed in this study started on April 2011 by using 16S rRNA gene clone libraries. In November 2013, a more sensitive and high-throughput screening was performed to further analyze the bacterial diversity of the microbial mats and sediment samples of the Lirima hot springs by using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding. We would like to emphasize that the two different techniques used for microbial community analyses are not directly comparable; rather, they complemented each other, as each provided strengths and weaknesses to microbial diversity analyses.
The bacterial community compositions that was determined by 16S rRNA gene clone libraries analyses of the P42 and P53 springs were mainly represented by anaerobic, microaerophilic and aerobic thermophiles, with some of these being associated with sulfate reducers or sulfide oxidizing metabolisms (Table S2A). The P42 spring was composed mainly by OTUs that were classified as Clostridia (26%), Bacteroidia (19%) and Gammaproteobacteria (13%) (Figure 2A; Table S2A). Moreover, the P53 spring was highly represented by Gammaproteobacteria (29%), Bacilli (24%) and Clostridia (19%) (Figure 2A; Table S2A). On the other hand, the archaeal community compositions that was determined by 16S rRNA gene clone libraries analyses of the P42 and P53 springs could only be assigned to higher taxonomic levels (class, order) (Figure 2B; Table S2B) and were also associated with anaerobic and thermophilic taxa belonging to Crenarchaeota, Diapherotrites, Nanoarchaeota, Hadesarchaeota, Euryarchaeota; as well as an aerobic ammonia oxidizer from Thaumarchaeota. The core groups (detected in both springs) presented changes in their contributions that were potentially associated with the different physical and chemical conditions. For example, the Crenarchaeota phylum decreased its contribution in our libraries from 55% to 43% (P42 vs. P53), and a single class (Thermoplasmata) from the Euryarchaeota phylum decreased its contribution in our libraries from 20% to 14% (Figure 2B; Table S2B), whereas specific archaea, such as Diapherotrites and Nanoarchaeota, were detected only at the P42 spring, (Figure 2B; Table S2B).
Both Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota are widely found in hot springs all over the world [38,39,40]. Furthermore, Nanoarchaeota comprise a diverse group of archaea that are capable of inhabiting a broad spectrum of temperatures and geochemical environments, and this phylum has been found to be widespread in terrestrial hot springs including a hydrothermal sediment sample from the Géiseres del Tatio volcanic region in Chile at the Atacama Desert [41,42].
The sequencing results of the bacterial 16S rRNA metabarcoding analysis from three springs (P42, P53A, P53B, P53C, and P72) varied from 1021 (P72) to 112,667 (P42) reads (Table S3). A total of 70 to 429 OTUs were taxonomically assigned to each spring, but only 21 OTUs were represented by >1000 reads (Table S3). The rarified species richness varied between 32.8 and 70 (Table S3; Figure S1) and the estimated richness based on Chao1 varied between 73 and 867 (Table S3). The Simpson’s index varied from 0.463 to 0.926. Good’s estimator showed a coverage of >99% for each site (Table S3), and the rarefaction analysis indicated that the curve did not reach an asymptote, particularly for P72 (Figure S2). The P42 and P53 (sediment A, B, C) springs showed the highest bacterial diversity compared with P72 at the phyla level (16–24 compared with 12; Figure 3A versus 3D). Moreover, the coolest spring sediments and mats (≤53 °C) presented a higher diversity of rare and low abundant phyla, including phyla like Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, which showed an increased contribution in the hottest spring (Figure 3B). Conversely, P72 did not present a rare biosphere, and its bacterial diversity was mainly represented by a few abundant phyla (12, P72; Figure 3D) and a lower representation of the semi-rare biosphere (Figure 3C). Li and colleagues [43], by using a culture-independent approach, determined that in the Tengchong geothermal field (China), microbial communities at higher temperatures (74.6–90.8 °C) had substantially lower diversity than those growing at a low temperature, showing only a few genera and a lower number of cells. Generally, it has been reported that thermal environments exhibit a lower microbial diversity, which is probably related to the unique development of specific adaptation strategies by these microorganisms to thrive under harsh conditions (see below). Furthermore, P72 had only 1021 sequences, and this could have limited the assignation of a higher number of OTUs. In some types of microorganisms, DNA extraction may be more difficult, as some bacteria and archaea are resistant to cell disruption [44], especially in samples from high temperatures and more acidic springs such as P72.
Potentially, the core bacterial communities at the Lirima hydrothermal system were Chloroflexi in springs with lower temperatures (84%, P42; 73%, P53A; 59%, P53B; and 75%, P53C), followed by Firmicutes, which reached up to 38% in the hottest spring (Figure 3A; Table S4). Other phyla, such as, Acetothermia, Atribacteria and Epsilonbacteraeota, were also prevalent in the sediment and mats of P53, and only low frequency groups, such as Fervidibacteria, Kiritimatiellaeota, TA06, and Thermotogae, were detected at this site (Figure 3A; Table S4). OTUs that were assigned as unclassified bacteria were found in all the springs (between 0.5% and 5.5%; Table S4), which could correspond to a high proportion of novel taxa in this complex ecosystem.
Thermophilic phototrophy could be a significant process in hydrothermal ecosystems when considering the presence of species such as Chloroflexi as a core microbial group, especially in springs with lower temperatures (42 and 53 °C) where it has shown a high abundance (Figure 3A). Photoautotrophic carbon fixation might be one of the most important biosynthetic processes in these oligotrophic habitats, especially in springs with a high availability of CO2, such as P72 [45,46,47]. Moreover, the presence of phototrophic microorganisms helps to increase the level of dissolved oxygen in hot waters, which is needed for the growth of aerobic or microaerophilic microorganisms in these communities [48]. The low abundance of sequences that were assigned to Chloroflexi (2%) in the P72 spring could be explained by the temperature (72 °C) and pH (5.2) of the spring, since it has been proposed that the upper temperature limit for phototrophic metabolism in neutral-to-alkaline springs is 73 °C, and it decreases with decreasing pH [49].
Phototrophic sulfur bacteria oxidize various inorganic sulfur compounds, such as sulfide, elemental sulfur, thiosulfate, ferrous iron and hydrogen, for use as electron donors in anoxygenic photosynthetic growth [50]. Therefore, sulfur bacteria are responsible for energy production, which helps to maintain the community structure [51]. Bacteria oxidize sulfur compounds for autotrophic CO2 fixation in reducing habitats (e.g., hydrothermal systems) and play a critical role in primary production and sulfur transformation [52,53]. The taxa that were retrieved by metabarcoding analysis (Table S3) showed sulfate or sulfite reducing bacteria, as well as anaerobic, microaerophilic and thermotolerant or thermophilic organisms. Sulfur bacteria belonging mostly to the Deltaproteobacteria class were found in the springs and included Desulfatirhabdium, Desulfobulbus, Desulfomicrobium, Desulfomonile, Desulfosoma, Desulfovermiculus, Desulfurella, Desulfurispora, Dissulfurimicrobium and Thermodesulfitimonas (Table S3).
Sequences that were assigned as uncultured were associated with novel phyla, such as the candidate phylum Armatimonadetes (OP10), candidate phylum Atribacteria (OP9/JS1), candidate phylum Acetothermia (OP1), and candidate phylum Caldiserica (OP5), all of which were detected with higher relative abundance in the P53 spring (Figure 3A). These candidate phyla of heterotrophic anaerobes have been also previously detected in geothermal springs in Yellowstone National Park in USA [54], Mae Fang hot spring in Thailand [55] and Tengchong thermal springs in China [56], which suggests a strong adaptation to hyperthermophilic environments. Different cultivation-independent genomic approaches have suggested that thermophilic heterotrophic anaerobes are potentially related to the primary fermentation of carbohydrates or the secondary fermentation of organic acids that are present in thermal environments [57].

3.1. Adaptation to Environmental Factors

The microbial community structure varied at the different springs of the Lirima hydrothermal system. A redundancy analysis indicated that the temperature, redox potential, and pH explained ~96% of the variance that was determined in the springs and revealed that changes in temperature greatly influenced the microbial community in the mats and sediments between 53 and 72 °C (Figure 4). This factor could select for and drive changes within these high-altitude thermophilic microbial communities, especially for Atribacteria, Chloroflexi, and Firmicutes, which were the most abundant phyla in the springs (Figure 4; Table S5). Our results support previous studies that have shown that significant differences in microbial communities exist among hot springs with different ranges of physicochemical parameters and discrete geographic locations [58,59,60]. Furthermore, Cole et al. [61] proposed that temperature can control the richness and composition of sediment communities at all taxonomic levels, possibly with the factors that covary with temperature in geothermal systems, due to processes such as degassing, mineral precipitation, evaporation, autotrophy and oxidation [62,63]. Therefore, adaptation mechanisms to stress-inducing environmental factors are important in microbial communities of extreme environments and could potentially explain their success in these types of ecosystems, as well as their evolution over time [18,19,64,65].
A high representation of Firmicutes in the hottest spring (P72) in the metabarcoding analysis and in the springs with lower temperatures (P42 and P53) shown by clonal analysis could be explained by a myriad of survival strategies to resist adverse conditions that have been previously described in this taxa (e.g., sporulation, metabolism adaptation/re-programming) and which represent one of the most ubiquitous microbial groups [66]. Fillippidou et al. [67] determined that there was a higher contribution of endospore-forming Firmicutes (EFF) at sites with multiple limiting factors such as the geothermal springs in Lirima. Recently, Filippidou et al [17] reported that different simultaneous stresses (e.g., heat shock stress, UV radiation and starvation) induce the diversification of Serratia ureilytica, a traditionally non-spore forming bacteria, into two populations, and they suggested that the occurrence of cell resting states could represent a successful strategy to cope with environmental polystresses.
In addition to changes in phylotypes, our results demonstrated that microbial communities in the Lirima hydrothermal system also show an overall high difference in their morphotypes that were found in all springs (Figure 5). It should be noted that the aim of the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images was not to estimate or quantify the diversity of the original natural communities but to visualize the presence of microorganisms in the samples and to distinguish different morphotypes between springs. The images showed that a rod-shaped morphology was more elongated and filamentous in the hottest spring (P72; Figure 5E), compared with springs with lower temperatures (P42, P53A, P53B and P53C; Figure 5A–D, respectively). Different morphotypes and cell sizes of microorganisms have often been described in hot springs and as being related to changes in microbial community structure according to their adaptation to environmental conditions of the spring water (temperature, pH and sulfur concentration) [68]. Furthermore, these differences could also be explained by morphological variation within phylotypes according to growth conditions, as described in hyperthermophilic microorganisms, such as Thermocrinis ruber, a pink- filament-forming bacterium that was isolated from Yellowstone National Park and which exhibits some degree of phenotypic plasticity [69].
The survival abilities of these communities could be increased through strategies such as mutualistic or commensalist symbiotic relationships [70] and lateral gene transfer, which would allow the acquisition of new functions to adapt to their environment [71]. However, further studies must be performed to define their environmental resistome [65].

3.2. Lirima Hot Spring: A Doorway for Early Life

Geologic evidence indicates that the first traces of life on Earth originated 3.8–4.2 Ga Year ago [5,72], and that primitive Earth had higher temperatures compared to modern Earth; therefore, one of the theories about the origin of life suggests that it could had occurred in hot environments like modern thermal systems [7]. Furthermore, hydrothermal systems appear to have played a fundamental role in the early evolution of Earth, as they linked the global lithospheric, hydrologic and atmospheric elemental cycles [73]. Over geologic time, volatile chemicals released by hydrothermal systems have significantly contributed to the evolution of the oceans and the atmosphere [74]. Hydrothermal systems contain important biogeological information that suggest these environments have played an important role in the history of the biosphere [74].
In the present study, we performed a search in our data for species that had similar characteristics to the supposedly common ancestor for life, which included thermophilic or thermotolerant, acidophilic or acidotolerant, anaerobic or facultative anaerobic metabolisms. Our results showed that the Lirima springs presented 41 genera that were described as anaerobic thermophilic, thermotolerant, acidophilic and or acidotolerant, that were distributed between 14 phyla, and that were highly represented by Firmicutes (Table 2). Furthermore, we performed a phylogenetic analysis to determine the presence of deeply branching microbial groups in our data by constructing a phylogenetic tree by using 16S rRNA gene sequences of the type strains of these 41 genera (Figure 6; Table S6). The phylogenetic tree showed a cluster of sequences that were closely grouped to two archaea (Archaeoglobus veneficuspor and Archaeoglobus profundus) that are commonly located in the deepest branch of the tree of life [7]. In this group, there were mainly Gram-negative bacterial genera, among which we found Chloroflexus, Roseiflexus, Caldisericum, Bellilinea, Thermanaerothrix, Fervidobacterium, Thermus, Thermogutta, and Fervidibacteria (Figure 4). These genera have been described with fermentative, chemoorganotrophic, autotrophic and mixotrophic metabolisms. Furthermore, Weiss et al. [7] suggested an autotrophic origin of life. Among phototrophs, the genus Chloroflexus and its filamentous relatives, such as Roseiflexus and Thermanaerothrix, have been located in the deepest phylum on the bacterial branch of the tree of life [75].
The phylogenetic information that is encoded in the genomes of modern thermophilic species appears to provide important clues about early biosphere evolution and the processes that shaped its history [2,74]. The deepest branches, and therefore those nearest to the common ancestor of all life (which was probably a chemolithoautotrophic, thermophilic and anaerobic organism), are represented by hyperthermophilic chemosynthetic microorganisms that use hydrogen and sulfur in their metabolism [1,6,7], suggesting that these environments may have been a “cradle” for the early biosphere and supporting the ideology that they are the “Doorway to Early Biosphere Evolution” [74]. Therefore, the high altitude hydrothermal environments of the Chilean Altiplano (~4000 m a.s.l.) are unique ecosystems that are dominated by microbial life whose hyper extreme conditions and low anthropogenic perturbations offer a natural laboratory to better understand the early processes that underlie the life forms we know today. Recently, Hug et al. [76], in “a new view of the tree of life” (including bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes), showed that the inclusion of uncultivated representatives (either rRNA sequences or functional genes) allows for a better taxonomic resolution in a phylogenetic analysis. Nonetheless, several taxa remain unresolved. Therefore, it is expected that using phylogenetic approaches that are based on metagenomic data and proteomics will give the most robust image of LUCA’s fingerprint found in the genes of modern organisms, especially from remote and understudied thermal ecosystems such as the Lirima hydrothermal system. Therefore, this will certainly be considered in future studies of this site.

4. Conclusions

In this study, microbial community diversity in the mats (P42 and P53A) and sediments (P53B, P53C and P72) of the Lirima hydrothermal system was investigated by using a metabarcoding analysis of the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene and 16S rRNA clonal analysis. The results revealed that the hot springs were characterized by an overall predominance of phototrophic bacteria, including Chlorobi, Chloroflexi and Cyanobacteria in springs with lower temperatures (P42 and P53) and a predominance of Firmicutes in warmer springs (P72). Microbial communities in Lirima are influenced by site-specific environmental factors, mainly temperature, which would select and probably drive changes in their composition, despite the geographical proximity between hot springs. Furthermore, our results also showed a high representation of metabolically versatile prokaryotes, such as Chloroflexi and Deltaproteobacteria, which are able to respond to changes in environmental factors.
Early Earth probably had a chemically reducing atmosphere, and primary life could have happened in thermal environments (e.g., hydrothermal systems); therefore, the study of modern hydrothermal ecosystems could provide an opportunity to have a better comprehension about the evolution of earliest life in the primitive atmosphere. Our study identified sequences that were associated with prokaryotes that have an anaerobic, thermophilic, thermotolerant, acidophilic and acidotolerant metabolism, which has been related to the metabolism that the common ancestor of life (LUCA) probably possessed.
Inland geothermal systems at high altitude have not been studied in detail as analogs of primitive Earth. Thus, the Lirima hydrothermal system represents a key system for the analysis of the microbial genomes of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic species from deep branches of the tree of life that could help reconstruct the evolutionary history of microbial communities in hydrothermal systems for Chile and the world. In this regard, the study and preservation of the microbial communities of these fragile ecosystems could expose the deep secret of primitive life and give evidence about the what kind of life we could expect to find on exoplanets.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/2/208/s1.

Author Contributions

V.P. executed 16S gene clone libraries and wrote the paper. J.C. measured field physical and chemical parameters, executed 16S gene metabarcoding and contributed in paper writing. F.M. contributed in data analysis and paper writing. C.D., K.H. and V.M. contributed in paper review and editing and are PIs of project grants supporting fieldtrip and data analyses. M.C.-D. measured field physical and chemical parameter. W.J. contributed in paper review and editing. S.B. analyzed 16S gene metabarcoding data. M.B.H. designed the experimental setup, contributed in paper writing and executed project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants Fondecyt 1100953, 1140356, 1140179, 1181773 and CeBiB FB0001.

Acknowledgments

We thank Valeria Souza, Valerie de Anda, Gabriel Ponce and Mirna Vázquez from UNAM (Mexico), for their invaluable help in metadata analysis. We express our special gratefully to Pedro and Margarita Luca for host facilities at Salar de Huasco, Alberto Ticuna and Roxana Herrera to authorize us to work in the Lirima hydrothermal system and field assistance, and Jaime Guerrero, for field assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Woese, C.R.; Kandler, O.; Wheelis, M.L. Towards a natural system of organisms: Proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 4576–4579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Farmer, J. Thermophiles, early biosphere evolution, and the origin of life on Earth: Implications for the exobiological exploration of Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Stetter, K.O. History of discovery of the first hyperthermophiles. Extremophiles 2006, 10, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Reysenbach, A.L.; Longnecker, K.; Kirshtein, J. Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situ growth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vent. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3798–3806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Lane, N.; Allen, J.F.; Martin, W. How did LUCA make a living? Chemiosmosis in the origin of life. BioEssays 2010, 32, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Berg, I.A.; Kockelkorn, D.; Ramos-Vera, W.H.; Say, R.F.; Zarzycki, J.; Hügler, M.; Alber, B.E.; Fuchs, G. Autotrophic carbon fixation in archaea. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Weiss, M.C.; Sousa, F.L.; Mrnjavac, N.; Neukirchen, S.; Roettger, M.; Nelson-Sathi, S.; Martin, W.F. The physiology and habitat of the last universal common ancestor. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xiao, X.; Zhang, Y. Life in extreme environments: Approaches to study life-environment co-evolutionary strategies. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2014, 57, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rasuk, M.C.; Fernández, A.B.; Kurth, D.; Contreras, M.; Novoa, F.; Poiré, D.; Farías, M.E. Bacterial Diversity in Microbial Mats and Sediments from the Atacama Desert. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 71, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cowan, D.A.; Ramond, J.-B.; Makhalanyane, T.P.; De Maayer, P. Metagenomics of extreme environments. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2015, 25, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wagner, I.D.; Wiegel, J. Diversity of thermophilic anaerobes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1125, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Menzel, P.; Gudbergsdóttir, S.R.; Rike, A.G.; Lin, L.; Zhang, Q.; Contursi, P.; Moracci, M.; Kristjansson, J.K.; Bolduc, B.; Gavrilov, S.; et al. Comparative metagenomics of eight geographically remote terrestrial hot springs. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 70, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Garreaud, R.; Vuille, M.; Clement, M.C. The climate of the Altiplano: Observed current conditions and mechanisms of past changes. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2003, 194, 5–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Tassi, F.; Aguilera, F.; Darrah, T.; Vaselli, O.; Capaccioni, B.; Poreda, R.J.; Huertas, A.D. Fluid geochemistry of hydrothermal systems in the Arica-Parinacota, Tarapacá and Antofagasta Regions (Northern Chile). J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2010, 192, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Procesi, M. Geothermal Potential Evaluation for Northern Chile and Suggestions for New Energy Plans. Energies 2014, 7, 5444–5459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Sanchez-Alfaro, P.; Sielfeld, G.; Van Campen, B.; Dobson, P.; Fuentes, V.; Reed, A.; Palma-Behnke, R.; Morata, D. Geothermal barriers, policies and economics in Chile—Lessons for the Andes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 1390–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Filippidou, S.; Junier, T.; Wunderlin, T.; Kooli, W.M.; Palmieri, I.; Al-Dourobi, A.; Molina, V.; Lienhard, R.; Spangenberg, J.E.; Johnson, S.L.; et al. Adaptive strategies in a poly-extreme environment: Differentiation of vegetative cells in Serratia ureilytica and resistance to extreme conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hernández, K.L.; Yannicelli, B.; Olsen, L.M.; Dorador, C.; Menschel, E.J.; Molina, V.; Remonsellez, F.; Hengst, M.B.; Jeffrey, W.H. Microbial activity response to solar radiation across contrasting environmental conditions in salar de huasco, northern chilean altiplano. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Molina, V.; Hernández, K.; Dorador, C.; Eissler, Y.; Hengst, M.; Pérez, V.; Harrod, C. Bacterial active community cycling in response to solar radiation and their influence on nutrient changes in a high-altitude wetland. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Pérez, V.; Hengst, M.; Kurte, L.; Dorador, C.; Jeffrey, W.H.; Wattiez, R.; Molina, V.; Matallana-Surget, S. Bacterial Survival under Extreme UV Radiation: A Comparative Proteomics Study of Rhodobacter sp., Isolated from High Altitude Wetlands in Chile. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Scott, S.; Dorador, C.; Oyanedel, J.P.; Tobar, I.; Hengst, M.; Maya, G.; Harrod, C.; Vila, I. Microbial diversity and trophic components of two high altitude wetlands of the Chilean Altiplano. Gayana 2015, 79, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. McAullife, C. GC determination of solutes by multiple phase equilibration. Chem. Technol. 1971, 1, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jurgens, G.; Glockner, F.O.; Amann, R.; Saano, A.; Montonen, L.; Likolammi, M.; Munster, U. Identification of novel Archaea in bacterioplankton of a boreal forest lake by phylogenetic analysis and fluorescent in situ hybridization. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2000, 34, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stackebrandt, E.; Liesack, W. Nucleic acids and classification. In Handbook of New Bacterial Systematics; Goodfellow, M., O’Donnell, A.G., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1993; pp. 152–189. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning—A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wright, E.S.; Yilmaz, L.S.; Noguera, D.R. DECIPHER, a search-based approach to chimera identification for 16S rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Caporaso, J.G.; Lauber, C.L.; Walters, W.A.; Berg-Lyons, D.; Huntley, J.; Fierer, N.; Owens, S.M.; Betley, J.; Fraser, L.; Bauer, M.; et al. Ultra-High-Throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012, 6, 1621–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, J.; Kobert, K.; Flouri, T.; Stamatakis, A. PEAR: A fast and accurate Illumina paired-end read merger. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Schloss, P.D.; Westcott, S.L.; Ryabin, T.; Hall, J.R.; Hartmann, M.; Hollister, E.B.; Lesniewski, R.A.; Oakley, B.B.; Parks, D.H.; Robinson, C.J.; et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7537–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Schloss, P.; Westcott, S. Assessing and Improving Methods Used in Operational Taxonomic Unit-Based Approaches for 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3219–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Oksanen, F.; Blanchet, G.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package Version 2.5-4; R Development Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  33. Good, I. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 1953, 40, 237–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleo-tide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [Google Scholar]
  35. Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 1981, 17, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kumar, S.; Tamura, K.; Nei, M. MEGA3: An integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment. Brief. Bioinform. 1954, 5, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Arcos, R.; Clavero, J.; Giavelli, A.; Simmons, S.; Aguirre, I.; Martini, S.; Mayorga, C.; Pineda, G.; Parra, J.; Soffia, J. Surface exploration at Pampa Lirima geothermal project, central Andes of northern Chile. Geotherm. Resour. Counc. Trans. 2011, 35, 689–693. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mardanov, A.V.; Gumerov, V.M.; Beletsky, A.V.; Perevalova, A.N.; KArpov, G.A.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya, A.B.; Ravin, N.V. Uncultured archaea dominate in the thermal groundwater of Uzon Caldera, Kamchatka. Extremophiles 2011, 15, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kambura, A.K.; Mwirichia, R.K.; Kasili, R.W.; Karanja, E.N.; Makonde, H.M.; Boga, H.I. Bacteria and Archaea diversity within the hot springs of Lake Magadi and Little Magadi in Kenya. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Panda, A.K.; Bisht, S.S.; De Mandal, S.; Kumar, N.S. Bacterial and archeal community composition in hot springs from Indo-Burma region, North-east India. AMB Express 2016, 6, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Hohn, M.J.; Hedlund, B.P.; Huber, H. Detection of 16S rDNA sequences representing the novel phylum “Nanoarchaeota”: Indication for a broad distribution in high temperature. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 25, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Casanueva, A.; Galada, N.; Baker, G.C.; Grant, W.D.; Heaphy, S.; Jones, B.; Yanhe, M.; Ventose, A.; Blamey, J.; Cowan, D.A. Nanoarchaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences are widely dispersed in hyperthermophilic and mesophilic halophilic environments. Extremophiles 2008, 12, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H.; Yang, Q.; Li, J.; Gao, H.; Li, P.; Zhou, H. The impact of temperature on microbial diversity and AOA activity in the Tengchong Geothermal Field, China. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Salonen, A.; Nikkilä, J.; Jalanka-Tuovinen, J.; Immonen, O.; Rajilić-Stojanović, M.; Kekkonen, R.A.; Palva, A.; de Vos, W.M. Comparative analysis of fecal DNA extraction methods with phylogenetic microarray: Effective recovery of bacterial and archaeal DNA using mechanical cell lysis. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 81, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bryant, D.A.; Frigaard, N.U. Prokaryotic photosynthesis and phototrophy illuminated. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bryant, D.A.; Liu, Z.; Li, T.; Zhao, F.; Garcia, A.M.; Klatt, C.G.; Ward, D.M.; Frigaard, N.-U.; Overmann, J. Comparative and functional genomics of anoxygenic green Bacteria from the taxa Chlorobi, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteria. In Functional Genomics and Evolution of Photosynthetic Systems; Burnap, R., Vermaas, W., Eds.; Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 33. [Google Scholar]
  47. Zeng, Y.; Feng, F.; Medová, H.; Dean, J.; Koblížek, M. Functional type 2 photosynthetic reaction centers found in the rare Bacterial phylum Gemmatimonadetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 7795–7800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Chan, C.S.; Chan, K.G.; Tay, Y.L.; Chua, Y.H.; Goh, K.M. Diversity of thermophiles in a Malaysian hot spring determined using 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenome sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Boyd, E.S.; Fecteau, K.M.; Havig, J.R.; Shock, E.L.; Peters, J.W. Modeling the habitat range of phototrophs in Yellowstone NationalPark: Toward the development of a comprehensive fitness landscape. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Frigaard, N.U.; Dahl, C. Sulfur metabolism in phototrophic sulfur bacteria. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2008, 54, 103–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Elshahed, M.S.; Senko, J.M.; Najar, F.Z.; Kenton, S.M.; Roe, B.A.; Dewer, T.A.; Spear, J.R.; Krumholz, L.R. Bacterial diversity and sulfur cycling in a mesophilic sulfide-rich spring. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 5609–5621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wahlund, T.M.; Woese, C.R.; Castenholz, R.W.; Madigan, M.T. A thermophilic green sulfur bacterium from New Zealand hot springs, Chlorobium tepidum sp.nov. Arch. Microbiol. 1991, 156, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dahl, C. Sulfur metabolism in phototrophic bacteria. In Modern Topics in the Phototrophic Prokaryotes; Hallenbeck, P., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 27–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Thiel, V.; Wood, J.M.; Olsen, M.T.; Tank, M.; Klatt, C.G.; Ward, D.M.; Bryant, D.A. The dark side of the Mushroom Spring microbial mat: Life in the shadow of Chlorophototrophs. I. Microbial diversity based on 16S rRNA gene amplicons and metagenomic sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Cuecas, A.; Portillo, M.C.; Kanoksilapatham, W.; Gonzalez, J.M. Bacterial distribution along a 50 °C temperature gradient reveals a parceled out hot spring environment. Microb. Ecol. 2014, 68, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hou, W.; Wang, S.; Dong, H.; Jiang, H.; Briggs, B.R.; Peacock, J.P.; Huang, Q.; Huang, L.; Wu, G.; Zhi, X.; et al. A comprehensive census of microbial diversity in hot springs of Tengchong, Yunnan Province China using 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Nobu, M.K.; Dodsworth, J.A.; Murugapiran, S.K.; Rinke, C.; Gies, E.A.; Webster, G.; Schwientek, P.; Kille, P.; Parkes, R.J.; Sass, H.; et al. Phylogeny and physiology of candidate phylum “Atribacteria” (OP9/JS1) inferred from cultivation-independent genomics. ISME J. 2016, 10, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Inskeep, W.P.; Rusch, D.B.; Jay, Z.J.; Herrgard, M.J.; Kozubal, M.A.; Richardson, T.H.; Macur, R.E.; Hamamura, N.; Jennings, R.; Fouke, B.W.; et al. Metagenomes from high-temperature chemotrophic systems reveal geochemical controls on microbial community structure and function. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Swingley, W.D.; Meyer-Dombard, D.A.-R.; Shock, E.L.; Alsop, E.B.; Falenski, H.D.; Havig, J.R.; Raymond, J. Coordinating environmental genomics and geochemistry reveals metabolic transitions in a hot spring ecosystem. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Delgado-Serrano, L.; López, G.; Bohorquez, L.C.; Bustos, J.R.; Rubiano, C.; Osorio-Forero, C.; Junca, H.; Baena, S.; Zambrano, M.M. Neotropical Andes hot springs harbor diverse and distinct planktonic microbial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014, 89, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Cole, J.K.; Peacock, J.P.; Dodsworth, J.A.; Williams, A.J.; Thompson, D.B.; Dong, H.; Wu, G.; Hedlund, B.P. Sediment microbial communities in Great Boiling Spring are controlled by temperature and distinct from water communities. ISME J. 2013, 7, 718–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Nordstrom, D.K.; Ball, J.W.; McCleskey, R.B. Ground Water to Surface Water: Chemistry of Thermal Outflows in Yellowstone National Park Geothermal Biology and Geochemistry in Yellowstone National Park; Skeep, W.P., Varley, J., Eds.; Thermal Biology Institute, Montana State University: Bozeman, MT, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  63. Fouke, B.W. Hot-spring systems geobiology: Abiotic and biotic influences on travertine formation at Mammoth Hot Springs, Yellowstone National Park, USA. Sedimentology 2011, 58, 170–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Urbieta, M.S.; Donati, E.R.; Chan, K.G.; Shahar, S.; Sin, L.L.; Goh, K.M. Thermophiles in the genomic era: Biodiversity, science, and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 633–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pérez, V.; Dorador, C.; Molina, V.; Yáñez, C.; Hengst, M. Rhodobacter sp. Rb3, an aerobic anoxygenic phototroph which thrives in the polyextreme ecosystem of the Salar de Huasco, in the Chilean Altiplano. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2018, 111, 1449–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Roberts, M.S.; Cohan, F.M. Recombination and migration rates in natural populations of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus mojavensis. Evolution 1995, 49, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Filippidou, S.; Wunderlin, T.; Junier, T.; Jeanneret, N.; Dorador, C.; Molina, V.; Johnson, D.R.; Junier, P. A Combination of Extreme Environmental Conditions Favor the Prevalence of Endospore-Forming Firmicutes. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Nakagawa, T.; Fukui, M. Molecular characterization of community structures and sulfur metabolism within microbial streamers in Japanese hot springs. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 7044–7057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Huber, R.; Eder, W.; Heldwein, S.; Wanner, G.; Huber, H.; Rachel, R.; Stetter, K.O. Thermocrinis ruber gen. nov., sp. nov., a pink-filament-forming hyperthermophilic bacterium isolated from Yellowstone National Park. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3576–3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Strazzulli, A.; Iacono, R.; Giglio, R.; Moracci, M.; Cobucci-Ponzano, B. Metagenomics of Hyperthermophilic Environments: Biodiversity and Biotechnology. In Microbial Ecology of Extreme Environments; Chénard, C., Lauro, F., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  71. Fru, C. Microbial evolution of sulphate reduction when lateral gene transfer is geographically restricted. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 1725–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Schuler, C.G.; Havig, J.R.; Hamilton, T.L. Hot spring microbial community composition, morphology, and carbon fixation: Implications for interpreting the ancient rock record. Front. Earth Sci. 2017, 5, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Des Marais, D.J. Stable light isotope biogeochemistry of hydrothermal systems. In Evolution of Hydrothermal Ecosystems on Earth and Mars? Bock, G., Goode, J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 83–93, 273–299. [Google Scholar]
  74. Farmer, J.D. Hydrothermal systems: Doorways to early biosphere evolution. GSA Today 2000, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  75. Garrity, G.; Boone, D.R.; Castenholtz, R.W. The Archaea and the Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd ed.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hug, L.A.; Brett, B.J.; Anantharaman, K.; Brown, C.T.; Probst, A.J.; Castelle, C.J.; Butterfield, C.N.; Hernsdorf, A.W.; Amano, Y.; Ise, K.; et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 00208 g001 550
Figure 1. Lirima hydrothermal system. Map of Chile that displays the location of the Lirima hydrothermal system and the spatial distribution of the hot springs (P42, P53A, P53B, P53C, and P72).
Figure 1. Lirima hydrothermal system. Map of Chile that displays the location of the Lirima hydrothermal system and the spatial distribution of the hot springs (P42, P53A, P53B, P53C, and P72).
Microorganisms 08 00208 g001
Microorganisms 08 00208 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the 16S rRNA gene clonal analysis that was classified at the phylum level of the microbial community structure from the hot springs at the Lirima hydrothermal system. (A) Bacterial diversity of the P42 and P53 springs. (B) Archaeal diversity of the P42 and P53 springs.
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the 16S rRNA gene clonal analysis that was classified at the phylum level of the microbial community structure from the hot springs at the Lirima hydrothermal system. (A) Bacterial diversity of the P42 and P53 springs. (B) Archaeal diversity of the P42 and P53 springs.
Microorganisms 08 00208 g002
Microorganisms 08 00208 g003a 550Microorganisms 08 00208 g003b 550
Figure 3. Relative abundance of the 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding analysis that was classified at the phylum level of the microbial community structure from the hot springs at the Lirima hydrothermal system. (A) Bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs. (B) Rare bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B and P53C springs. (C) Semi-rare bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs. (D) Abundant bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs.
Figure 3. Relative abundance of the 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding analysis that was classified at the phylum level of the microbial community structure from the hot springs at the Lirima hydrothermal system. (A) Bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs. (B) Rare bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B and P53C springs. (C) Semi-rare bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs. (D) Abundant bacterial diversity of the P42, P53A, P53B, P53C and P72 springs.
Microorganisms 08 00208 g003aMicroorganisms 08 00208 g003b
Microorganisms 08 00208 g004 550
Figure 4. Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination plot that illustrates the relations between the Lirima hot springs’ microbial community composition (red) and the environmental variables that explain most of the variance (black) in each of the springs (blue circles). The grey rectangle in the first plot (above) is represented in the second plot (below) with the ordination of the species with less abundance. The ordination of the species in the second plot was rearranged when plotted to accomplish a better resolution.
Figure 4. Redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination plot that illustrates the relations between the Lirima hot springs’ microbial community composition (red) and the environmental variables that explain most of the variance (black) in each of the springs (blue circles). The grey rectangle in the first plot (above) is represented in the second plot (below) with the ordination of the species with less abundance. The ordination of the species in the second plot was rearranged when plotted to accomplish a better resolution.
Microorganisms 08 00208 g004
Microorganisms 08 00208 g005 550
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs from enrichment cultures of hot springs. (A) P42, (B), P53A, (C), P53B, (D) P53C, and (E) P72.
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs from enrichment cultures of hot springs. (A) P42, (B), P53A, (C), P53B, (D) P53C, and (E) P72.
Microorganisms 08 00208 g005
Microorganisms 08 00208 g006 550
Figure 6. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of early life genera. The evolutionary history was inferred by using maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura–Nei model with one hundred bootstraps to assign confidence levels to the nodes of the trees, (MEGA version 7.0.26).
Figure 6. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of early life genera. The evolutionary history was inferred by using maximum likelihood method based on the Tamura–Nei model with one hundred bootstraps to assign confidence levels to the nodes of the trees, (MEGA version 7.0.26).
Microorganisms 08 00208 g006
Table
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters of the Lirima hot springs.
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters of the Lirima hot springs.
Physicochemical ParametersSampling YearP42P53AP53BP53CP72
Temperature (°C)201145515151ND
20134248485372
pH20117.927.67.67.6ND
20137.87.27.27.25.2
Conductivity (µS/cm)20112520210021002100ND
201318371875187518751848
Salinity (psu)20111111ND
20130.890.710.710.710.86
Redox potential (mV)2013’−152.4−246.7−246.7−246.7−316.9
Type of Soil MatMatSedimentSedimentSediment
Altitude (m a.s.l.) 40164016401640164,016
GPS coordinates 19°51′7.75″S; 68°54′24.20″W19°51′7.75″S; 68°54′24.20″W19°51′7.75″S; 68°54′24.20″W19°51′7.75″S; 68°54′24.20″W19°51′5.69″S; 68°54′23.57″W
Table
Table 2. Genera described as aerobic, anaerobic thermophilic, thermotolerant, acidophilic and or acidotolerant of the Lirima hot springs.
Table 2. Genera described as aerobic, anaerobic thermophilic, thermotolerant, acidophilic and or acidotolerant of the Lirima hot springs.
Characteristics1GenusPhylumMetabarcoding2Clones2
P42P53AP53BP53CP72P42P53
◯■❖ChloracidobacteriumAcidobacteria
◯■♦ThermoanaerobaculumAcidobacteria
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001☐Actinomyces Actinobacteria
◯■ChthonomonadalesArmatimonadetes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■Candidatus Caldatribacterium Atribacteria
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001☑FervidibacteriaBacteroidetes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■GBChlB Bacteroidetes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■IgnavibacteriumBacteroidetes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■CaldisericumCaldiserica
◯☐BellilineaChloroflexi
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■ChloroflexusChloroflexi
◯■RoseiflexusChloroflexi
◯■ThermanaerothrixChloroflexi
◯■ThermusDeinococcus–Thermus
◯♦■ Microorganisms 08 00208 i002AlicyclobacillusFirmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■CaldicellulosiruptorFirmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■ Microorganisms 08 00208 i002CaloramatorFirmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001☐CaproiciproducensFirmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001☐Clostridium sensu strictoFirmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■ Microorganisms 08 00208 i002DesulfurisporaFirmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001☐Halanaerobium Firmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001❖LactobacillusFirmicutes
◯■ Microorganisms 08 00208 i002MoorellaFirmicutes
◯■RuminiclostridiumFirmicutes
◯☐♦ Microorganisms 08 00208 i002SulfobacillusFirmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■ Microorganisms 08 00208 i002TepidanaerobacterFirmicutes
◯■ThermobrachiumFirmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■Thermodesulfitimonas Firmicutes
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■ThermosyntrophaFirmicutes
◯■ThermoguttaPlanctomycetes
◯❖■AcetobacterProteobacteria
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■DesulfosomaProteobacteria
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■ Microorganisms 08 00208 i002DesulfurellaProteobacteria
◯■DichotomicrobiumProteobacteria
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■DissulfurimicrobiumProteobacteria
◯■ElioraeaProteobacteria
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■SilanimonasProteobacteria
◯❖ThiomonasProteobacteria
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■ExilispiraSpirochaetae
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■Treponema Spirochaetae
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■FervidobacteriumThermotogae
Microorganisms 08 00208 i001■DEV007Verrucomicrobia
1 Symbols representing each characteristic; 2 Relative abundance color code; Microorganisms 08 00208 i001 Anaerobic; ◯ Aerobic; ◯ Facultative anaerobic; ■ Thermophilic; ☐ Thermotolerant; ☑ Hyperthermophilic; ♦ Acidophilic; ❖ Acidotolerant; and Microorganisms 08 00208 i002 Spore former; Highlight in blue: <0.1%; Highlight in yellow: 0.1–1%; Highlight in bright green: >0.1%.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez, V.; Cortés, J.; Marchant, F.; Dorador, C.; Molina, V.; Cornejo-D’Ottone, M.; Hernández, K.; Jeffrey, W.; Barahona, S.; Hengst, M.B. Aquatic Thermal Reservoirs of Microbial Life in a Remote and Extreme High Andean Hydrothermal System. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020208

AMA Style

Pérez V, Cortés J, Marchant F, Dorador C, Molina V, Cornejo-D’Ottone M, Hernández K, Jeffrey W, Barahona S, Hengst MB. Aquatic Thermal Reservoirs of Microbial Life in a Remote and Extreme High Andean Hydrothermal System. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2):208. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020208

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez, Vilma, Johanna Cortés, Francisca Marchant, Cristina Dorador, Verónica Molina, Marcela Cornejo-D’Ottone, Klaudia Hernández, Wade Jeffrey, Sergio Barahona, and Martha B. Hengst. 2020. "Aquatic Thermal Reservoirs of Microbial Life in a Remote and Extreme High Andean Hydrothermal System" Microorganisms 8, no. 2: 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020208

APA Style

Pérez, V., Cortés, J., Marchant, F., Dorador, C., Molina, V., Cornejo-D’Ottone, M., Hernández, K., Jeffrey, W., Barahona, S., & Hengst, M. B. (2020). Aquatic Thermal Reservoirs of Microbial Life in a Remote and Extreme High Andean Hydrothermal System. Microorganisms, 8(2), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020208

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop