Next Article in Journal
Different Dynamics of Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Hive-Stored Bee Bread and Their Possible Roles: A Case Study from Two Commercial Honey Bees in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of a Versatile Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium Pseudomonas mediterranea Strain S58
Previous Article in Journal
Phenotypic and Genotypic Traits of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci from Healthy Food-Producing Animals
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isolation and Identification of Microvirga thermotolerans HR1, a Novel Thermo-Tolerant Bacterium, and Comparative Genomics among Microvirga Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/microorganisms8020262
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genomic and Metabolic Insights into Denitrification, Sulfur Oxidation, and Multidrug Efflux Pump Mechanisms in the Bacterium Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov.

by
Chun-Zhi Jin
1,2,†,
Ye Zhuo
1,†,
Xuewen Wu
1,
So-Ra Ko
3,
Taihua Li
1,
Feng-Jie Jin
1,
Chi-Yong Ahn
3,
Hee-Mock Oh
3,
Hyung-Gwan Lee
3 and
Long Jin
1,*
1
Co-Innovation Centre for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210-037, China
2
Industrial Biomaterial Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Korea
3
Cell Factory Research Centre, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology (KRIBB), Daejeon 34141, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(2), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020262
Submission received: 27 December 2019 / Revised: 5 February 2020 / Accepted: 13 February 2020 / Published: 15 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Isolation and Characterization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This genus contains both phototrophs and nonphototrophic members. Here, we present a high-quality complete genome of the strain CHu59-6-5T, isolated from a freshwater sediment. The circular chromosome (4.39 Mbp) of the strain CHu59-6-5T has 64.4% G+C content and contains 4240 genes, of which a total of 3918 genes (92.4%) were functionally assigned to the COG (clusters of orthologous groups) database. Functional genes for denitrification (narGHJI, nirK and qnor) were identified on the genomes of the strain CHu59-6-5T, except for N2O reductase (nos) genes for the final step of denitrification. Genes (soxBXAZY) for encoding sulfur oxidation proteins were identified, and the FSD and soxF genes encoding the monomeric flavoproteins which have sulfide dehydrogenase activities were also detected. Lastly, genes for the assembly of two different RND (resistance-nodulation division) type efflux systems and one ABC (ATP-binding cassette) type efflux system were identified in the Rhodoferax sediminis CHu59-6-5T. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA sequences and Average Nucleotide Identities (ANI) support the idea that the strain CHu59-6-5T has a close relationship to the genus Rhodoferax. A polyphasic study was done to establish the taxonomic status of the strain CHu59-6-5T. Based on these data, we proposed that the isolate be classified to the genus Rhodoferax as Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov. with isolate CHu59-6-5T.

1. Introduction

Rhodoferax species are frequently found in stagnant aquatic environments exposed to light [1], and some have been isolated from fresh water, sewage, sludge and sediments [2,3,4,5,6,7]. In the case of Rhodoferax antarcticus, strains were first isolated from microbial mats collected from saline ponds [2]. Rhodoferax growth occurs in a temperature range from 2 to 35 °C [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Rhodoferax fermentans, Rhodoferax ferrireducens, Rhodoferax koreense, Rhodoferax lacus and Rhodoferax bucti are mesophilic species with an optimal growth temperature between 25 and 30 °C [1,3,5,6,7]. The other two species, R. antarcticus and Rhodoferax saidenbachensis, are psychrotolerant with optimal growth temperatures ranging from 15 to 20 °C, but they are capable of growth at temperatures near 0 °C [2,4]. Rhodoferax is also well known for its diverse metabolic pathways. Members of the Rhodoferax species are able to grow phototrophically, aerobically and anaerobically. Two species in this genus, R. fermentans and R. antarcticus, grow photoheterotrophically using carbon sources such as acetate, pyruvate, lactate and succinate. Genomic features that provide photosynthesis gene clusters of the R. antarcticus have already been reported [8]. In contrast, R. ferrireducens is able to grow anaerobically using organic electron donors to reduce ferric iron (Fe+3) to ferrous (Fe+2) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. As of 2019, seven genomes have been sequenced from the genus Rhodoferax. Some of them contain the genes for the RuBisCo (ribulose 1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase), several heavy metal resisting genes, and putative arsenite efflux pump genes [9]. Recently, the species R. ferrireducens was applied to the area of sustainable energy microbial fuel cells (MFC), where a bacterial suspension was used as a source of electrons for the bacteria [10]. Additionally, Rhodoferax is one of most abundant groups in the lakes of northeastern Germany [11], understanding the ecology of the genus Rhodoferax and their roles in geochemical cycles, as well as their physiology, would contribute to the understanding of its functions in environments. In the present study, a non-phototrophic member in this genus Rhodoferax obtained from freshwater was investigated at the genome and metabolic level, and a polyphasic approach was applied to establish its taxonomic status.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sampling, Isolation and Cultivation of the Strain

Strain CHu59-6-5T was recovered from a 67 cm-long sediment core (36°22’30” N, 127°33’58” E) collected at a water depth of 17 m from the Daechung Reservoir using a modified gravity corer (Wildco, FL, USA) (Figure 1). The Daechung Reservoir is located in the central region of South Korea, which is a large branch-type lake, and the reservoir has a 72 m-high dam with a gross storage capacity of 1490 Mm3, where cyanobacterial blooms occur every year because of eutrophication and global warming [12,13,14,15]. Approximately one gram of sediment sample was applied to the serial dilution method in a 0.85% saline solution. A total of 100 µl aliquot of each serial dilution (10−6 or 10−7) was spread on onto modified 1/10 R2A medium (Difco, NJ, USA), which is specifically used for isolating aquatic bacteria [16] and incubated at 25 °C under aerobic heterotrophic conditions. A colorless colony CHu59-6-5T was isolated after 6 days and routinely subcultured on an R2A agar at 30 °C for 48 h. For long term preservation of the culture, glycerol stocks (20% v/v) were prepared and stored at −70 °C. Strains were cultured on R2A agar for most physiological experiments.

2.2. Morphological, Physiological and Chemotaxonomic Characteristics

The cell morphology was examined using transmission electron microscopy (Philips CM-20) after negative staining with 1 % (w/v) phosphotungstic acid, and the motility was checked in a phase-contrast microscope (Nikon Optiphot, 1000 × magnification) after 2 days of incubation in R2A at 30 °C. Gram staining was performed by using a Gram stain kit (Becton Dickinson) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The activity of oxidase was tested using the oxidase reagent (bioMérieux), and catalase activity was determined by observing the production of O2 bubbles after dropping 3% (w/v) H2O2 on a fresh culture grown for 48 h on R2A medium [17]. Cell growth was investigated in different bacteriological media: R2A agar, tryptic soy agar (TSA; Difco, NJ, USA), Luria-Bertani (LB; Difco, NJ, USA) and nutrient agar (NA; Difco, NJ, USA). The growth temperature range was checked at 4, 8, 15, 20, 30, 37 and 42 °C. The pH range for growth was determined by measuring the OD values of R2A broth cultures after 3 days. Then, pH was adjusted to 5–10 at intervals of 1 pH unit with appropriate biological buffers [18,19]. Tolerance of NaCl was checked on R2A agar with different NaCl concentrations (0%–5%, w/v). Duplicated antibiotic-susceptibility was conducted using filter-paper disks containing the following: amikacin (30 µg·mL−1), ampicillin/sulbactam (20 µg·mL−1, 1:1), chloramphenicol (30 µg·mL−1), erythromycin (30 µg·mL−1), gentamicin (30 µg·mL−1), kanamycin (30 µg·ml−1), lincomycin (15 µg·mL−1), nalidixic acid (30 µg·mL−1), rifampicin (30 µg·mL−1), spectinomycin (25 µg·mL−1), streptomycin (25 µg·mL−1), teicoplanin (30 µg·mL−1), tetracycline (30 µg·mL−1, and vancomycin (30 µg·mL−1). Susceptibility results were recorded as positive at zones with diameters greater than 10 mm after incubation at 30 °C for 2 days. Carbon source utilization, enzyme activities and additional physiological and biochemical characterization were performed using API 20NE, API ID 32GN and API ZYM kits (bioMérieux, l’Etoile, France) and the Biolog GN2 MicroPlate following the manufacturer’s instructions.
For the comparative whole-cell fatty acid profile, strains CHu59-6-5T, R. saidenbachensis DSM 22694T, R. lacus KACC 18983T, R. bucti KCTC 62564T and R. koreense KCTC 52288T were cultured on R2A agar for 3 days at 30 °C. Cell harvesting standardization was done following the method described by Jin et al. [20], and the extracted fatty acids were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) (Hewlett Packard 6890, Kyoto, Japan) and identified in the TSBA 6 (Trypticase Soy Broth Agar) database using the Sherlock software 6.1. Respiratory isoprenoid quinones were extracted and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with the YMC-Pack ODS-A column, following the method described by Komagata and Suzuki [21]. Polar lipids were extracted according to the method of Tindall [22]. The biomass used for lipid extraction was obtained from cultures growing on R2A agar plates at 30 °C for 3 days. Several spraying reagents were applied for visualizing the spots on the two-dimensional thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck): molybdatophosphoric acid for total spots, ninhydrin for aminolipids, molybdenum blue for phospholipids and alphanaphthol solution for glycolipids.

2.3. Genomic and Phylogenetic Analyses

Whole genomic DNA was extracted using a FastDNATM SPIN kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 16S rRNA gene of strain Chu59-6-5T was amplified by PCR (polymerase chain reaction) with the following universal primer sets: 27F (5’-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3’; Escherichia coli position 8-27) and 1492R (5’-TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3’; E. coli position 1492-1510) [23], and identified in the server of EzBioCloud [24]. For the phylogenetic analysis, 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain CHu59-6-5T and closely related species were aligned with clustal x [25] and edited with bioedit [26]. Based on the aligned sequences, the phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the following algorithms in the mega7 software [27]: neighbor-joining [28], maximum-parsimony [29] and maximum-likelihood methods [30]. In each case, bootstrap values were calculated based on 1000 resamplings of the sequences [31]. The whole genome sequencing was carried out using the SMRT (Single Molecule, Real-Time) platform at Novogene Biotechnology (Beijing, China) together with Illumina next-generation sequencing technology. The low-quality read filtration and assemblage of the draft genome were conducted using SMRT version 5.0.1. The genome annotation of strain CHu59-6-5T was annotated in the RAST pipeline, and a sequence-based comparison was made using the SEED Viewer [32,33]. The predicted protein coding sequences (CDSs) were submitted to the COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/) to generate the functional category and summary statistics [34,35]. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were calculated using the OrthoANI tool in EZBioCloud web server [36].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physiological Tests

Strain CHu59-6-5T formed visible colonies at 48 h on R2A agar when incubated at 30 °C. Cell growth was found to occur at temperatures ranging from 4 to 37 °C, and quite good growth was observed at 4 °C after 10 days; however, no growth was observed at 0 or 42 °C. Growth was found to occur at pH 6–9; however, no growth was observed at pH 5 or 10. The cells were found to be Gram-stain-negative, catalase and oxidase-positive, motile by gliding, and short rod-shaped (Supplementary Figure S1). The cells were found to assimilate d-alanine, 2,3-butanediol, citrate, d-galactose (weakly), glycogen, β-hydroxybutyric acid, α-ketoglutaric acid, d,l-lactic acid, l-proline (weakly), succinamic acid, succinic acid monomethyl ester and turanose (weakly) but not the rest (API 20NE, API ID 32GN test strips and Biolog GN2). The cells were found to be positive for the following enzyme activities (API ZYM test strip): acid phosphatase (weakly), esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8) and leucine arylamidase but not the rest (Table 1). The cells were found to be susceptible to amikacin (30 µg·mL−1), ampicillin/sulbactam (1:1; µg·mL−1), chloramphenicol (30 µg·mL−1), erythromycin (30 µg·mL−1), gentamicin (30 µg·mL−1), kanamycin (30 µg·mL−1), rifampicin (30 µg·mL−1), spectinomycin (25 µg·mL−1), streptomycin (25 µg·mL−1), teicoplanin (30 µg·mL−1), tetracycline (30 µg·mL−1) and but resistant to lincomycin (15 µg·mL−1), nalidixic acid (30 µg·mL−1) and vancomycin (30 µg·mL−1).

3.2. Chemotaxonomy

The major fatty acids (>10%) were sorted into three groups C16:1 ω7c and/or C16:1 ω6c (29.6%), C16:0 (21.6%) and C17:0 cyclo (15.0%) (Table 2). The profile of major fatty acids in the strain CHu59-6-5T was consistent with the components in species from the genus Rhodoferax, although some qualitative and quantitative differences were found. The strain CHu59-6-5T was observed to have quite large amounts of C10:0 3-OH (6.4 %), C17:0 (6.9 %) and C15:1 ω6c (6.4 %), which were not found, or barely found, in the reference strains (Table 2). The major predominant respiratory ubiquinone was Q-8. The polar lipids consisted of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), three unidentified phospholipids (PL1-3), two unidentified aminophospholipids (APL1-2) and four unidentified lipids (L1-4) (Supplementary Figure S2). The polar lipid profile of strain CHu59-6-5T was similar to those of R. saidenbachensis DSM 22694T, R. lacus KACC 18983T, R. bucti KCTC 62564T and R. koreense KCTC 52288T in that phosphatidylethanolamine and the unidentified polar lipid were the major polar lipids, but could be differentiated from those of the reference strains in the presence or absence of several other polar lipids.

3.3. Genomic Analysis: The Taxonomic Status

The 16S rRNA gene sequence (1478 nt) of strain CHu59-6-5T was compared against the 16S rRNA gene sequences of representative species within the genus Rhodoferax and related genera. We used the EzTaxon-e server (www.ezbiocloud.net) to search for their closest members. The results show that strain CHu59-6-5T shares a 98.8% pairwise similarity with Rhodoferax saidenbachensis ED16T, 98.4% with Rhodoferax lacus IMCC26218T, 98.2% with Rhodoferax bucti GSA243-2T and less than 98.0% with other species in the genus Rhodoferax. The strain CHu59-6-5T also shares high similarities with other species than just members of Rhodoferax: 98.1% with Curvibacter delicates NBRC 14919T Curvibacter fontanus AQ9T, 97.8% with Curvibacter fontanus AQ9T, 97.5% with Variovorax boronicumulans BAM-48T and 97.3% with Variovorax paradoxus NBRC 15149T. However, strain CHu59-6-5T clustered clearly with the species of Rhodoferax from the topology of the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). To determine genomic relatedness with other Rhodoferax species and its genomic characteristics, whole genome sequence of strain CHu59-6-5T was obtained by the PacBio platform together with the Illumina MiSeq platform. The draft genome sequence of strain CHu59-6-5T was deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank with the accession number CP036282. The genomic DNA G+C content of the strain was 64.4 mol%, which is within the range reported for the genus Rhodoferax (59.52–66.2 mol%). The observed ANI and dDDH values between strain CHu59-6-5T and all species of Rhodoferax were 74.3%–76.9 % and 21.3%–23.3 % (Table 3), respectively, which were much lower than the species separation threshold of 95%–96% and in fact fall in the intergeneric range [37,38,39].

3.4. Genome Properties

The genome of strain CHu59-6-5T consists of a single circular chromosome of 4,387,497 base pairs with a G+C content of 64.4% (Figure 3). Of the 4240 genes identified in the total genome, 4191 were protein-encoding genes, 49 were ribosomal or transfer RNAs, and 133 were putative pseudogenes (Table 3 and Supplementary Table S1). A total of 3918 genes (92.4%) were functionally assigned to the COG database. The distribution of the genes into the COG functional categories is presented in Table 3 and Supplementary Figure S3. Similar to the closely related Rhodoferax strains, abundant genes related to amino acid transport and metabolism (COG category E), transcription (COG category K), and energy production and conversion (COG category C) were observed. Unexpectedly, 27.7% of genes were assigned to the unknown function COG category in the genome of strain CHu59-6-5T (Supplementary Table S2).

3.5. Carbon Metabolism

Two anoxygenic phototrophic species in the genus Rhodoferax, R. fermentans and R. antarcticus have been reported. Both members are confirmed to have gene clusters including genes encoding light-harvesting complex and RuBisCo (ribulose 1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) genes [1,2,8,40,41]. Genes of complete sets of glycolysis and the citric acid cycle were identified in the genome of strain CHu59-6-5T. Furthermore, genes for the Entner–Doudoroff pathway and pentose phosphate pathway were also detected (Figure 4). No genes for encoding RuBisCO (ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) or light-harvesting complex were found in the genome of strain CHu59-6-5T, which means that strain CHu59-6-5T is not able to fix CO2 [41,42]. Strain CHu59-6-5T contains genes encoding phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase (EC 4.1.1.31), but lacks genes encoding pyruvate–phosphate dikinase. This means that some other enzyme together with PEP carboxylase assists in adding CO2 to PEP [43].

3.6. Denitrification

Denitrification can take place in both terrestrial and marine ecosystems and is one of the main branches of the global nitrogen cycle supported by bacteria. Typically, denitrification occurs in anoxic environments, where the concentration of dissolved and available oxygen is depleted and nitrate (NO3−) or nitrite (NO2−) can be used as a substitute terminal electron acceptor instead oxygen [44,45,46].
Key functional genes (narGHJI, nirK and qnor) for denitrification were identified on the genomes of the strain CHu59-6-5T except for Nos genes. Currently, denitrification starts with a membrane bound (narGHI) in the mesophilic models of bacteria [47,48]. Genes encoding nitrate reductase (narGHJI) and nitrate/nitrite transporters (naNiT) were identified (Figure 5A). Nitrite produced in the cytoplasm by NarGHJI will then be secreted to the periplasm through a membrane transporter (NaNiT) and reduced to nitric oxide (NO) by copper-containing nitrite reductase (NirK). Strain CHu59-6-5T possesses two quinone-dependent nitric oxide reductases (qNor). As the NO is highly toxic, it needs to be reduced to N2O immediately by a membrane-bound nitric oxide reductase (Nor) (Figure 5B). Depending on the type of Nor enzyme used, electrons for this reaction can be transferred by a periplasmic cytochrome c (cNor) or by quinones (qNor) [47,49,50,51]. Strain CHu59-6-5T does not contain N2O reductase (Nos) genes for the final step of denitrification. In many denitrifying microorganisms, N2O is finally reduced to N2 by a periplasmic reductase (NosZ), in which a cytochrome c or a type I copper protein has to act as an electron donor [52]. However, the cases in which organisms without nos genes still can produce N2 gas have been studied, supporting the idea that a different type of N2O reductase needs to be discovered [53,54].

3.7. Sulfur Oxidation

Most of the sulfur-oxidizing bacteria are autotrophic and use reduced sulfur as electron donors for carbon dioxide fixation [55]; chemolithotrophic microorganisms obtain energy by oxidizing inorganic compounds for their structural components to survive, grow and reproduce [56,57]. Some inorganic forms of reduced sulfur (H2S/HS−, S0) can be oxidized by chemolithotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria coupled to the reduction of oxygen (O2) or nitrate (NO3−) [56,58].
The functional genes for sulfur oxidation (sox) participating in a thiosulfate-oxidizing multienzyme system include SoxXYZABDEFGH, which is able to oxidize various reduced sulfur compounds to sulfates [57]. The strain CHu59-6-5T possesses genes (soxBXAZY) encoding for sulfur oxidation proteins (Figure 6), soxB, soxXA and soxZY genes are suggested to be essential to thiosulfate oxidation [59,60]. The SoxYZ complex appears as hetero- and homo-dimers with protein disulfide linked subunits, SoxB contains a dinuclear manganese cluster which is proposed to function as sulfate thiohydrolase and interacts with the SoxYZ complex [61,62]. The FSD and soxF gene encoding the monomeric flavoproteins which have sulfide dehydrogenase activities has also been detected. Those sulfur oxidation Sox systems indicate that the strain CHu59-6-5T appears to be capable of thiosulfate oxidation to sulfate.

3.8. RND and ABC Efflux Systems

Bacterial efflux pumps are categorized into five families: ABC, the ATP-binding cassette superfamily; MFS, the major facilitator superfamily; MDR, the small multidrug resistance family; RND, the resistance-nodulation division superfamily; and MATE, the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family [63,64]. RND efflux systems, a category of bacterial efflux pumps, play a prominent role in both intrinsic and acquired multidrug resistance identified in Gram-negative bacteria and catalyze the active efflux of a wide variety of antibacterial substrates including antibiotics and chemotherapeutic agents [65,66]. RND efflux systems are normally composed of three proteins: an inner membrane transporter, an outer membrane protein that functions as a pore, and a periplasmic protein that interacts with both the inner and outer membrane proteins to provide a conduit for the extrusion of small molecules [67].
Two different RND type efflux systems and one ABC type efflux system have been detected in the strain CHu59-6-5T. The genome of the strain CHu59-6-5T contains three-gene operon cmeABC (Figure 7A). CmeABC is also a tripartite efflux system composed of three proteins CmeA, CmeB and CmeC: the inner membrane protein CmeB, the periplasmic fusion protein CmeA, and the outer membrane protein CmeC [68]. A TetR family regulator gene AcrR was present just upstream of the operon. The AcrR regulator is known to act to repress the AcrAB operon in E. coli [69]. Except for the complete CmeABC gene cluster, three more CmeC genes encoding outer membrane lipoproteins were found throughout the genome. The genome also has been found to have complete genes for the AcrAB-TolC efflux pump, which has shown to be resistant to chloramphenicol, fluoroquinolone, tetracycline, novobiocin, rifampin, fusidic acid, nalidixic acid and β-lactam antibiotics [70]. Except for the complete AcrAB-TolC gene cluster, two more AcrB genes encoding the inner membrane proteins were detected through the genome. Interestingly, the genome of the strain CHu59-6-5T possesses an ABC-type efflux pump MacAB-TolC (Figure 7B), which has resistance to a variety of macrolides, aminoglycosides and polymyxins [71]. TolC is an outer membrane protein which interacts with several inner membrane efflux pumps to expel antibiotics and export virulence factors from bacteria [72], and works in combination with other RND, ABC, and MFS efflux pumps [73,74]. The genome of strain CHu59-6-5T possesses only one TolC gene, presumably working cooperatively as outer membrane proteins of AcrAB-TolC and MacAB-TolC. Those efflux systems may function complementarily with them and can work sequentially when one fails.

3.9. Motility

All the members of genus Rhodoferax are motile by polar flagella except for Rhodoferax bucti [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. This genetic evidence of motility by flagella and type IV pili in Rhodoferax antarcticus was found in previous observations by Baker et al. [8], in which the genes coding proteins synthesizing polar flagella, fliEFGHIJKLMNPQR, were well studied.
The genome of strain CHu59-6-5T contains genes for motility via IV pili but not flagella. Type IV pili, important virulence factors in many bacterial pathogens, generate motile forces called twitching or gliding motility in Bacteria and Archaea. The biogenesis of Type IV pili relies on macromolecular assemblies composed of 15 conserved proteins (PilC, PilD, PilE, PilF, PilG, PilH, PilI, PilJ, PilK, PilM, PilN, PilO, PilP, PilQ and PilW) in model Gram-negative bacteria [75,76]. The strain CHu59-6-5T contains all 15 necessary genes for the proteins, and the type IV pilus genes in the strain CHu59-6-5T are located in a more typical pattern throughout the chromosome (Supplementary Figure S4). Unfortunately, no pili of any type have been found in the cultured CHu59-6-5T cells (Supplementary Figure S1), but the gliding motility was observed by a phase-contrast microscope.

4. Conclusions

To summarize our investigations, the strain CHu59-6-5T from a freshwater sediment belonging to the genus Rhodoferax was studied through genome analysis, together with a polyphasic approach. The phylogenetic analysis indicated that the strain CHu59-6-5T was affiliated closely with the species of Rhodoferax, based on the phylogenetic, genomic and physiological differences; thus, we propose the strain CHu59-6-5T as a novel species, Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov., in the family Comamonadaceae.
Unlike two phototrophs in the genus Rhodoferax, phototrophic systems were not detected. Rhodoferax sediminis CHu59-6-5T possesses genes encoding for denitrification and nitrate ammonification related genes (GS/GOGAT pathway: glutamine synthetase/glutamate oxoglutarate aminotransferase) (data not shown). Rhodoferax sediminis CHu59-6-5T also contains genes for sulfur oxidation and all the essential genes encoding for proteins of CmeABC, AcrAB-TolC and MacAB-TolC multidrug efflux systems. Besides this, the strain CHu59-6-5T contains all necessary genes for type IV pilus proteins.
The genome sequence and comparative genome analyses of Rhodoferax sediminis CHu59-6-5T provide a genetic blueprint and physiological characteristics which help us to understand the different metabolism and evolutionary life of the genus Rhodoferax.
Taxonomic Description of proposed Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov.
Etymology: Rhodoferax sediminis (se.di′mi.nis. L. gen. n. sediminis of sediment).
Cells are Gram-stain-negative, motile by gliding and rods (0.8–1.3 µm long; 0.5–0.7 µm wide). Colonies grown on R2A agar are colorless. Cells are catalase and oxidase positive. Growth occurs on R2A at temperatures from 4 to 37 °C (optimum temperature 25–30 °C) but not 42 °C. The pH range for growth is from pH 6.0 to 9.0 (optimum pH 6-7) but not at pH 5.0 and 10.0. Growth occurs in the presence of 1% NaCl, but not with 2% or above. Cells are found to be positive for nitrate reduction but negative for indole production, glucose acidification, urease, aesculin hydrolysis, gelatin hydrolysis and β-galactosidase. Cells utilize d-alanine, 2,3-butanediol, citrate, d-galactose (weakly), d-glucose, β-hydroxybutyric acid, α-ketoglutaric acid, d,l-lactic acid, l-proline (weakly), succinamic acid, succinic acid monomethyl ester and turanose (weakly), but not acetic acid, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine, N-acetyl-glucosamine, cis-aconitic acid, adipate, adonitol, l-alaninamide, l-alanine, l-alanylglycine, l-asparagine, l-aspartic acid, γ-aminobutyric acid, 2-aminoethanol, l-arabinose, l-arabitol, bromosuccinic acid, caprate, dl-carnitine, d-cellobiose,α-cyclodextrin, dextrin, i-erythritol, formic acid, d-fructose, l-fructose, l-fucose, d-galactonic acid lactone, d-galacturonic acid, gentiobiose, d-gluconate, α-d-glucose-1-phosphate, d-glucose-6-phosphate, d-glucosaminic acid, α-d-glucose, glucuronamide, d-glucuronic acid, l-glutamic acid, glycerol, dl-α-glycerol phosphate, glycogen, glycyl l-aspartic acid, glycyl l-glutamic acid, l-histidine, hydroxy-l-proline, 3-hydroxybenzoate, 4-hydroxybenzoate, α-hydroxybutyric acid, γ-hydroxybutyric acid, p-hydroxyphenylacetic acid, inosine, inositol, myo-inositol, itaconate, α-ketobutyric acid, 2-ketogluconate, 5-ketogluconate, α-ketovaleric acid, α-d-lactose, lactulose, l-leucine, malate, malonate, maltose, d-mannitol, d-mannose, d-melibiose, methyl β-d-glucoside, l-ornithine, phenylacetate, l-phenylalanine, phenylethylamine, propionic acid, d-psicose, putrescine, l-pyroglutamic acid, pyruvic acid methyl ester, quinic acid, d-raffinose, l-rhamnose, d-ribose, d-saccharic acid, salicin, sebacic acid, d-serine, l-serine, d-sorbitol, suberate, succinic acid, sucrose, l-threonine, thymidine, d-trehalose, Tween 40, Tween 80, uridine, urocanic acid, valerate or xylitol. Cells are found to be positive for the following enzyme activities: acid phosphatase (weakly), esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8) and leucine arylamidase. Cells are found to be negative for the following enzyme activities: N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, alkaline phosphatase, α-chymotrypsin, cystine arylamidase, α-fucosidase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, lipase (C14), α-mannosidase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, trypsin and valine arylamidase. The only respiratory quinone is ubiquinone Q-8. The major polar lipids are phosphatidylethanolamine, two unidentified phospholipids and one unidentified aminophospholipid. The major fatty acids are grouped into three categories C16:1 ω7c and/or C16:1 ω6c, C16:0 and C17:0 cyclo. The G+C content of the DNA is 64.4 mol%. The strain type CHu59-6-5T was isolated from a sediment sample of Dachung reservoir, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, and deposited at two different culture collections within the assigned numbers of KCTC 62554T and JCM 32677T, respectively.
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence the whole genome sequence of strain CHu59-6-5T are MF770245 and CP035503, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/2/262/s1.

Author Contributions

C.-Z.J., Y.Z. and L.J. conceived and designed the experiments; C.-Z.J., Y.Z., X.W., S.-R.K., and L.J. performed the experiments; T.L., F.-J.J., C.-Y.A. and H.-M.O. analysed the data; C.-Z.J., H.-G.L. and L.J. wrote the manuscript; and all co-authors edited numerous drafts. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20191387), National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP; Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) (NRF-2018R1C1B3009513) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hiraishi, A.; Hoshino, Y.; Satoh, T. Rhodoferax fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a phototrophic purple nonsulfur bacterium previously referred to as the “Rhodocyclus gelatinosus-like” group. Arch. Microbiol. 1991, 155, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Madigan, M.T.; Jung, D.O.; Woese, C.R.; Achenbach, L.A. Rhodoferax antarcticus sp. nov., a moderately psychrophilic purple nonsulfur bacterium isolated from an Antarctic microbial mat. Arch. Microbiol. 2000, 173, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Finneran, K.T.; Johnsen, C.V.; Lovley, D.R. Rhodoferax ferrireducens sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, facultatively anaerobic bacterium that oxidizes acetate with the reduction of Fe(III). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 669–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kaden, R.; Spröer, C.; Beyer, D.; Krolla-Sidenstein, P. Rhodoferax saidenbachensis sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, very slowly growing bacterium within the family Comamonadaceae, proposal of appropriate taxonomic position of Albidiferax ferrireducens strain T118T in the genus Rhodoferax and emended description of the genus Rhodoferax. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 1186–1193. [Google Scholar]
  5. Farh, M.E.; Kim, Y.J.; Singh, P.; Jung, S.Y.; Kang, J.P.; Yang, D.C. Rhodoferax koreense sp. nov, an obligately aerobic bacterium within the family Comamonadaceae, and emended description of the genus Rhodoferax. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Park, M.; Song, J.; Nam, G.G.; Cho, J.C. Rhodoferax lacus sp. nov., isolated from a large freshwater lake. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 3135–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, D.; Tan, X.; Zhang, W.; Chen, H.Y.; Fan, Q.M.; He, X.L.; Lv, J. Rhodoferax bucti sp. nov., isolated from fresh water. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 3903–3909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baker, J.M.; Riester, C.J.; Skinner, B.M.; Newell, A.W.; Swingley, W.D.; Madigan, M.T.; Jung, D.O.; Asao, M.; Chen, M.; Loughlin, P.C.; et al. Genome Sequence of Rhodoferax antarcticus ANT.BRT.; A psychrophilic purple nonsulfur bacterium from an Antarctic microbial mat. Microorganisms 2017, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Risso, C.; Sun, J.; Zhuang, K.; Mahadevan, R.; DeBoy, R.; Ismail, W.; Shrivastava, S.; Huot, H.; Kothari, S.; Daugherty, S.; et al. Genome-scale comparison and constraint-based metabolic reconstruction of the facultative anaerobic Fe(III)-reducer Rhodoferax ferrireducens. BMC Genomics 2009, 10, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Rabaey, K.; Verstraete, W. Microbial fuel cells: Novel biotechnology for energy generation. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salka, I.; Čuperová, Z.; Mašín, M.; Koblížek, M.; Grossart, H.P. Rhodoferax related pufM gene cluster dominates the aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic communities in German freshwater lakes. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 2865–2875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Oh, H.M.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, H.S.; Yoon, B.D. Seasonal variation and indirect monitoring of microcystin concentrations in Daechung Reservoir, Korea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 1484–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kim, S.G.; Joung, S.H.; Ahn, C.Y.; Ko, S.R.; Boo, S.M.; Oh, H.M. Annual variation of Microcystis genotypes and their potential toxicity in water and sediment from a eutrophic reservoir. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 74, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ahn, C.Y.; Oh, H.M.; Park, Y.S. Evaluation of environmental factors on cyanobacterial bloom in eutrophic reservoir using artificial neural network. J. Phycol. 2011, 47, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jin, L.; Lee, C.S.; Ahn, C.Y.; Lee, H.G.; Lee, S.; Shin, H.H.; Lim, D.; Oh, H.M. Abundant iron and sulfur oxidizers in the stratified sediment of a eutrophic freshwater reservoir with annual cyanobacterial blooms. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jin, L.; Ko, S.R.; Lee, C.S.; Ahn, C.Y.; Oh, H.M.; Lee, H.G. Asprobacter aquaticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a prosthecate alphaproteobacterium isolated from fresh water. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 4443–4448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, H.G.; Ko, S.R.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, C.S.; Ahn, C.Y.; Oh, H.M.; Jin, L. Blastomonas fulva sp. nov., aerobic photosynthetic bacteria isolated from a Microcystis culture. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 3071–3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bates, R.G.; Bower, V.E. Alkaline solutions for pH control. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 1322–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gomori, G. Preparation of buffers for use in enzyme studies. Methods Enzymol. 1955, 1, 138–146. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jin, L.; Ko, S.R.; Jin, C.Z.; Jin, F.J.; Li, T.; Ahn, C.Y.; Oh, H.M.; Lee, H.G. Description of novel members of the family Sphingomonadaceae: Aquisediminimonas profunda gen. nov., sp. nov., and Aquisediminimonas sediminicola sp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 2179–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Komagata, K.; Suzuki, K.I. Lipid and cell wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol. 1987, 19, 161–207. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tindall, B.J. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1990, 66, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Weisburg, W.G.; Barns, S.M.; Pelletier, D.A. Lane DJ 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Yoon, S.H.; Ha, S.M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBio-Cloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Jeanmougin, F.; Higgins, D.G. The Clustal X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 24, 4876–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. mega7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method; a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar]
  29. Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 1981, 17, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fitch, W.M. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 1971, 20, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Felsenstein, J. Confidence limit on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Aziz, R.K.; Bartels, D.; Best, A.A.; DeJongh, M.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Formsma, K.; Gerdes, S.; Glass, E.M.; Kubal, M.; et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Aziz, R.K.; Devoid, S.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Henry, C.S.; Olsen, G.J.; Olson, R.; Overbeek, R.; Parrello, B.; Pusch, G.D.; et al. SEED servers: High-performance access to the SEED genomes, annotations, and metabolic models. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Tatusov, R.L.; Koonin, E.V.; Lipman, D.J. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 1997, 278, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tatusov, R.L.; Fedorova, N.D.; Jackson, J.D.; Jacobs, A.R.; Kiryutin, B.; Koonin, E.V.; Krylov, D.M.; Mazumder, R.; Mekhedov, S.L.; Nikolskaya, A.N.; et al. The COG database: An updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinform. 2003, 4, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lee, I.; Kim, Y.O.; Park, S.C.; Chun, J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1100–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Richter, M.; Rosselló-Móra, R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19126–19131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kim, M.; Oh, H.S.; Park, S.C.; Chun, J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goris, J.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Klappenbach, J.A.; Coenye, T.; Vandamme, P.; Tiedje, J.M. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2007, 57, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Waidner, L.A.; Kirchman, D.L. Aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis genes and operons in uncultured bacteria in the Delaware River. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1896–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tuveson, R.W.; Larson, R.A.; Kagan, J. Role of cloned carotenoid genes expressed in Escherichia coli in protecting against inactivation by near-UV light and specific phototoxic molecules. J. Bacteriol. 1988, 170, 4675–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Badger, M.R.; Bek, E.J. Multiple Rubisco forms in proteobacteria: Their functional significance in relation to CO2 acquisition by the CBB cycle. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 1525–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lu, Y.K.; Marden, J.; Han, M.; Swingley, W.D.; Mastrian, S.D.; Chowdhury, S.R.; Hao, J.; Helmy, T.; Kim, S.; Kurdoglu, A.A.; et al. Metabolic flexibility revealed in the genome of the cyst-forming α-1 proteobacterium Rhodospirillum centenum. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Galloway, J.N.; Dentener, F.J.; Capone, D.G.; Boyer, E.W.; Howarth, R.W.; Seitzinger, S.P.; Asner, G.P.; Cleveland, C.C.; Green, P.A.; Holland, E.A.; et al. Nitrogen cycles: Past, present and future. Biogeochemistry 2004, 70, 153–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seitzinger, S.; Harrison, J.A.; Bohlke, J.K.; Bouwman, A.F.; Lowrance, R.; Peterson, B.; Tobias, C.; Drecht, G.V. Denitrification across Landscapes and Waterscapes: A Synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 2006, 16, 2064–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Schlesinger, W.H. On the fate of anthropogenic nitrogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Simon, J.; Klotz, M.G. Diversity and evolution of bioenergetic systems involved in microbial nitrogen compound transformations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1827, 114–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Richardson, D.J. Bacterial respiration: A flexible process for a changing environment. Microbiology 2000, 146, 551–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Rinaldo, S.; Cutruzzola, F. Nitrite reductases in denitrification. Biol. Nitrogen Cycle 2007, 37–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nordling, M.; Young, S.; Karlsson, B.G.; Lundberg, L.G. The structural gene for cytochrome c551 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The nucleotide sequence shows a location downstream of the nitrite reductase gene. FEBS Lett. 1990, 259, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pearson, I.V.; Page, M.D.; van Spanning, R.J.; Ferguson, S.J. A mutant of Paracoccus denitrificans with disrupted genes coding for cytochrome c550 and pseudoazurin establishes these two proteins as the in vivo electron donors to cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductase. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 6308–6315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Dell’acqua, S.; Moura, I.; Moura, J.J.; Pauleta, S.R. The electron transfer complex between nitrous oxide reductase and its electron donors. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 16, 1241–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Zumft, W.G.; Kroneck, P.M. Respiratory transformation of nitrous oxide (N2O) to dinitrogen by Bacteria and Archaea. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2007, 52, 107–227. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sanford, R.A.; Wagner, D.D.; Wu, Q.; Chee-Sanford, J.C.; Thomas, S.H.; Cruz-García, C.; Rodríguez, G.; Massol-Deyá, A.; Krishnani, K.K.; Ritalahti, K.M. Unexpected nondenitrifier nitrous oxide reductase gene diversity and abundance in soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 19709–19714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Fike, D.A.; Bradley, A.S.; Leavitt, W.D. Geomicrobiology of sulfur. In Ehrlich’s Geomicrobiology, 6th ed.; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  56. Burgin, A.J.; Hamilton, S.K. NO3−-Driven SO42− Production in Freshwater Ecosystems: Implications for N and S Cycling. Ecosystems 2008, 11, 908–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Friedrich, C.G.; Bardischewsky, F.; Rother, D.; Quentmeier, A.; Fischer, J. Prokaryotic sulfur oxidation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005, 8, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fry, B.; Ruf, W.; Gest, H.; Hayes, J.M. Sulfur isotope effects associated with oxidation of sulfide by O2 in aqueous solution. Isot. Geosci. 1988, 73, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wall, J.D.; Arkin, A.P.; Balci, N.C.; Rapp-Giles, B. Genetics and genomics of sulfate respiration in Desulfovibrio. Microbial. Sulfur Metabolism 2008, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dahl, C. Inorganic sulfur compounds as electron donors in purple sulfur bacteria. Sulfur Metab. Phototrophic Org. 2008, 27, 289–317. [Google Scholar]
  61. Quentmeier, A.; Hellwig, P.; Bardischewsky, F.; Grelle, G.; Kraft, R.; Friedrich, C.G. Sulfur oxidation in Paracoccus pantotrophus: Interaction of the sulfur-binding protein SoxYZ with the dimanganese SoxB protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 312, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Epel, B.; Schäfer, K.O.; Quentmeier, A.; Friedrich, C.G.; Lubitz, W. Multifrequency EPR analysis of the dimanganese cluster of the putative sulfate thiohydrolase SoxB of Paracoccus pantotrophus. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 10, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bogomolnaya, L.M.; Andrews, K.D.; Talamantes, M.; Maple, A.; Ragoza, Y.; Vazquez-Torres, A.; Andrews-Polymenis, H. The ABC-type efflux pump MacAB protects Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium from oxidative stress. MBio 2013, 4, e00630-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Sun, J.; Deng, Z.; Yan, A. Bacterial multidrug efflux pumps: Mechanisms, physiology and pharmacological exploitations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 453, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Tseng, T.T.; Gratwick, K.S.; Kollman, J.; Park, D.; Nies, D.H.; Goffeau, A.; Saier, M.H. The RND permease superfamily: An ancient, ubiquitous and diverse family that includes human disease and development proteins. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 1, 107–125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Li, X.Z.; Nikaido, H. Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria: An update. Drugs 2009, 69, 1555–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tipton, K.A.; Farokhyfar, M.; Rather, P.N. Multiple roles for a novel RND-type efflux system in Acinetobacter baumannii AB5075. Microbiologyopen 2016, 6, e00418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lin, J.; Michel, L.O.; Zhang, Q. CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2124–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Li, M.; Gu, R.; Su, C.C.; Routh, M.D.; Harris, K.C.; Jewell, E.S.; McDermott, G.; Yu, E.W. Crystal structure of the transcriptional regulator AcrR from Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 374, 591–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Piddock, L.J. Multidrug-resistance efflux pumps—Not just for resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lin, Y.T.; Huang, Y.W.; Liou, R.S.; Chang, Y.C.; Yang, T.C. MacABCsm, an ABC-type tripartite efflux pump of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia involved in drug resistance, oxidative and envelope stress tolerances and biofilm formation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 3221–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Greene, N.P.; Kaplan, E.; Crow, A.; Koronakis, V. Antibiotic Resistance Mediated by the MacB ABC Transporter Family: A Structural and Functional Perspective. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Turlin, E.; Heuck, G.; Simões Brandão, M.I.; Szili, N.; Mellin, J.R.; Lange, N.; Wandersman, C. Protoporphyrin (PPIX) efflux by the MacAB-TolC pump in Escherichia coli. Microbiologyopen 2014, 3, 849–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Anes, J.; McCusker, M.P.; Fanning, S.; Martins, M. The ins and outs of RND efflux pumps in Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol. 2015, 6, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Merz, A.J.; So, M.; Sheetz, M.P. Pilus retraction powers bacterial twitching motility. Nature 2000, 407, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Goosens, V.J.; Busch, A.; Georgiadou, M.; Castagnini, M.; Forest, K.T.; Waksman, G.; Pelicic, V. Reconstitution of a minimal machinery capable of assembling periplasmic type IV pili. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E4978–E4986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 00262 g001 550
Figure 1. Sampling site and location of the Daechung Reservoir. Map shows the location of the sampling site on the shore in the vicinity of the Daechung Reservoir dam in the central region of South Korea. A 67 cm-long sediment core was collected at a 17 m water depth. IS, isolation section.
Figure 1. Sampling site and location of the Daechung Reservoir. Map shows the location of the sampling site on the shore in the vicinity of the Daechung Reservoir dam in the central region of South Korea. A 67 cm-long sediment core was collected at a 17 m water depth. IS, isolation section.
Microorganisms 08 00262 g001
Microorganisms 08 00262 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed using the neighbor-joining method in mega 7 which depicts the phylogenetic relationship of strain CHu59-6-5T among related taxa. The tree was reconstructed based on 1399 nucleotides. Numbers at branching points refer to bootstrap values (1000 resamplings, values above 50% shown). Bar, 0.5 substitution per 100 nt positions. Filled circles indicate that the corresponding nodes were also calculated in trees generated with the algorithms of maximum-likelihood and maximum-parsimony.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed using the neighbor-joining method in mega 7 which depicts the phylogenetic relationship of strain CHu59-6-5T among related taxa. The tree was reconstructed based on 1399 nucleotides. Numbers at branching points refer to bootstrap values (1000 resamplings, values above 50% shown). Bar, 0.5 substitution per 100 nt positions. Filled circles indicate that the corresponding nodes were also calculated in trees generated with the algorithms of maximum-likelihood and maximum-parsimony.
Microorganisms 08 00262 g002
Microorganisms 08 00262 g003 550
Figure 3. Graphic representation of circular genome plot of CHu59-6-5T. From the inner to the outer circle: The circles represent from outside to inside with the first and last circle showing the genomic position. The second and fifth circle shows the predicted protein coding sequences according to the COG (Clusters of Orthologous Group) database. The third and fourth circle shows protein-coding regions. The sixth circle represents variation in G + C content. The seventh circle shows a GC skew ([G − C]/[G + C]) plot of the genome.
Figure 3. Graphic representation of circular genome plot of CHu59-6-5T. From the inner to the outer circle: The circles represent from outside to inside with the first and last circle showing the genomic position. The second and fifth circle shows the predicted protein coding sequences according to the COG (Clusters of Orthologous Group) database. The third and fourth circle shows protein-coding regions. The sixth circle represents variation in G + C content. The seventh circle shows a GC skew ([G − C]/[G + C]) plot of the genome.
Microorganisms 08 00262 g003
Microorganisms 08 00262 g004 550
Figure 4. Model predictions for metabolism and some transporters of strain CHu59-6-5T. Nitrogen metabolic and sulfur oxidation pathways are indicated. Several transporters and electron transport systems are shown. Two electron chains, complex I (NADH dehydrogenase) and complex II (succinate dehydrogenase), were observed. Complex II usually parallel electron transport to complex I. A C-family heme-copper cbb3 oxidase, which presumably serves as the terminal electron acceptor during aerobic respiration, was identified. The genome also encodes genes related to the type IV pilus. PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; GS/GOGAT: glutamine synthetase/glutamate oxoglutarate aminotransferase.
Figure 4. Model predictions for metabolism and some transporters of strain CHu59-6-5T. Nitrogen metabolic and sulfur oxidation pathways are indicated. Several transporters and electron transport systems are shown. Two electron chains, complex I (NADH dehydrogenase) and complex II (succinate dehydrogenase), were observed. Complex II usually parallel electron transport to complex I. A C-family heme-copper cbb3 oxidase, which presumably serves as the terminal electron acceptor during aerobic respiration, was identified. The genome also encodes genes related to the type IV pilus. PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; GS/GOGAT: glutamine synthetase/glutamate oxoglutarate aminotransferase.
Microorganisms 08 00262 g004
Microorganisms 08 00262 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Denitrification gene clusters located on draft genome of strain CHu59-6-5T. Color key: pink, nor genes; light orange, nir genes; blue-grey, cco genes (cytochrome c oxidase subunit); green, nnr genes (NO sensing protein (NnrS); denitrification regulatory protein (NnrU); white, dnr gene (NO responding transcriptional regulator); blue, naNiT genes (nitrate/nitrite transporter); yellow, naRas gene (nitrite reductase [NAD(P)H] large subunit (NaRas1), Nitrite reductase [NAD(P)H] small subunit (NaRas2); purple, reg genes; gold, nar genes; grey, naT gene (nitrate ABC transporter). (B) The substance transformation in the denitrification process was identified from the genome.
Figure 5. (A) Denitrification gene clusters located on draft genome of strain CHu59-6-5T. Color key: pink, nor genes; light orange, nir genes; blue-grey, cco genes (cytochrome c oxidase subunit); green, nnr genes (NO sensing protein (NnrS); denitrification regulatory protein (NnrU); white, dnr gene (NO responding transcriptional regulator); blue, naNiT genes (nitrate/nitrite transporter); yellow, naRas gene (nitrite reductase [NAD(P)H] large subunit (NaRas1), Nitrite reductase [NAD(P)H] small subunit (NaRas2); purple, reg genes; gold, nar genes; grey, naT gene (nitrate ABC transporter). (B) The substance transformation in the denitrification process was identified from the genome.
Microorganisms 08 00262 g005
Microorganisms 08 00262 g006 550
Figure 6. Sulfur oxidation gene cluster of strain CHu59-6-5T. Color key: golden, FSD gene (cytochrome c subunit of flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase); blue; sox genes.
Figure 6. Sulfur oxidation gene cluster of strain CHu59-6-5T. Color key: golden, FSD gene (cytochrome c subunit of flavocytochrome c sulfide dehydrogenase); blue; sox genes.
Microorganisms 08 00262 g006
Microorganisms 08 00262 g007a 550Microorganisms 08 00262 g007b 550
Figure 7. The gene clusters of RND and ABC type efflux pump in the genome of strain CHu59-6-5T (A). Three types of tripartite efflux pump. From left to right, CmeABC pump, AcrAB-TolC pump and MacAB-TolC pump (B).
Figure 7. The gene clusters of RND and ABC type efflux pump in the genome of strain CHu59-6-5T (A). Three types of tripartite efflux pump. From left to right, CmeABC pump, AcrAB-TolC pump and MacAB-TolC pump (B).
Microorganisms 08 00262 g007aMicroorganisms 08 00262 g007b
Table
Table 1. Features that differentiate strain CHu59-6-5T from the most closely related species in the genus Rhodoferax.
Table 1. Features that differentiate strain CHu59-6-5T from the most closely related species in the genus Rhodoferax.
CharacteristicCHu59-6-5TR. saidenbachensis DSM 22694TR. lacus KACC 18983TR. bucti KCTC 62564TR. koreense KCTC 52288T
Isolation sourceSedimentSediment*Freshwater†FreshwaterǂSludge§
MorphologyShort rodsShort rods*Rods†Curved rodsǂRods§
Colony colourColourlessColourlessColourlessPeach brownColourless
Motility+++-+
Growth temperature4–374–30*4–30†15–35ǂ4–30§
Oxidase/catalase+/++/−+/+−/+−/+
Urease−++−+
Aesculin hydrolysis−−++−
Enzyme activity:
alkaline phosphatase−++++
esterase (C4)++++−
esterase lipase (C8)++−++
α-glucosidase−−−+−
α-galactosidase−−−+−
β-galactosidase−−++−
leucine arylamidase+−+++
naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase−+−++
Carbon utilization:
l-alanine+−−−+
l-arabinose−−−−+
citrate+−−−−
l-fucose−−−+−
gluconate−−−−+
d-glucose+++−+
histidine−−−−+
3-hydroxy-benzoate−−−−+
4-hydroxy-benzoate−−−−+
3-hydroxy-butyrate+−−−+
d,l-lactate++−−+
2-ketogluconate−−−++
5-ketogluconate−−−++
maltose−−−+−
d-mannitol−+−++
d-mannose−+−−-
d-melibiose−−−+-
l-proline−−−−+
d-ribose−−−++
d-sorbitol−−−+−
d-sucrose−−−+−
DNA G+C content (mol%)64.460.3–61*62.3†61.2ǂ60.3§
All data are from this study unless indicated. +, positive; −, negative. Note: * Data from Kaden et al. [4]; † Data from Park et al. [6]; ǂ Data from Zhou et al. [7]; § Data from Farh et al. [5].
Table
Table 2. Cellular fatty acid compositions (%) of strain CHu59-6-5T and the type strains of related species of the genus Rhodoferax.
Table 2. Cellular fatty acid compositions (%) of strain CHu59-6-5T and the type strains of related species of the genus Rhodoferax.
Fatty AcidsCHu59-6-5TR. saidenbachensis DSM 22694TR. lacus KACC 18983TR. bucti KCTC 62564TR. koreense KCTC 52288T
Saturated
C11:0−−−−0.9
C12:03.0 1.3 1.1 0.5 12.0
C13:01.3 −−−−
C14:02.9 0.2 0.7 0.3 1.7
C15:0−0.5 1.3 1.1 −
C16:021.6 33.6 28.2 29.3 24.7
C17:06.9 0.4 −1.0 4.6
C18:0−1.2 1.3 2.0 0.3
Unsaturated −
C14:1 ω5c−1.30.5 0.9 3.0
C15:1 ω6c7.5 −−−−
C15:1 ω6c−0.2 −0.5 −
C16:1 ω5c1.8 −−−−
Hydroxy −
C8:0 3-OH−1.50.8 0.9 1.8
C9:0 3-OH0.9 −−−−
C10:0 3-OH6.4 −−−10.7
C16:1 2-OH1.2 −−−−
C17:0 3-OH1.2 −−−−
Cyclo −
C17:0 cyclo15.0−−−9.9
Summed features‡ −
329.653.659.3 60.2 26.5
80.86.14.2 2.8 2.3
Data are from the present study. −, not detected. Note: ‡ Summed Feature 3 contains C16:1 ω7c and/or C16:1 ω6c; summed feature 8 contains C18:1 ω7c and/or C18:1 ω6c.
Table
Table 3. General features, and relationship of the genomes between strain CHu59-6-5T and strains of its closely related species of the genus Rhodoferax.
Table 3. General features, and relationship of the genomes between strain CHu59-6-5T and strains of its closely related species of the genus Rhodoferax.
AttributeCHu59-6-5TR. saidenbachensis DSM 22694TR. lacus
KACC 18983T		R. bucti
KCTC 62564T		R. koreense
KCTC 52288T		R. ferrireducens T118TR. fermentans
KACC 15304T
Genome size (bp)4,387,4974,264,8554,900,4053,673,5015,895,6414,969,7844,467,741
G + C content (%)64.460.962.361.266.259.956.9
N504,387,4974,264,855234,657937,7075,800,4734,712,3374,447,702
L501162111
Number of contigs11728322
Number of coding sequences4191403044203436534643394176
Number of tRNA43464444474553
Number of rRNA36749612
ANI (%)10075.474.974.476.975.274.3
dDDH (%)10022.121.323.320.922.322.4
GenBank Accession numberCP035503CP019239QFZK00000000VAHD00000000CP019236CP000267MTJN00000000
Data are from the present study unless indicated.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, C.-Z.; Zhuo, Y.; Wu, X.; Ko, S.-R.; Li, T.; Jin, F.-J.; Ahn, C.-Y.; Oh, H.-M.; Lee, H.-G.; Jin, L. Genomic and Metabolic Insights into Denitrification, Sulfur Oxidation, and Multidrug Efflux Pump Mechanisms in the Bacterium Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020262

AMA Style

Jin C-Z, Zhuo Y, Wu X, Ko S-R, Li T, Jin F-J, Ahn C-Y, Oh H-M, Lee H-G, Jin L. Genomic and Metabolic Insights into Denitrification, Sulfur Oxidation, and Multidrug Efflux Pump Mechanisms in the Bacterium Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2):262. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Chun-Zhi, Ye Zhuo, Xuewen Wu, So-Ra Ko, Taihua Li, Feng-Jie Jin, Chi-Yong Ahn, Hee-Mock Oh, Hyung-Gwan Lee, and Long Jin. 2020. "Genomic and Metabolic Insights into Denitrification, Sulfur Oxidation, and Multidrug Efflux Pump Mechanisms in the Bacterium Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov." Microorganisms 8, no. 2: 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020262

APA Style

Jin, C. -Z., Zhuo, Y., Wu, X., Ko, S. -R., Li, T., Jin, F. -J., Ahn, C. -Y., Oh, H. -M., Lee, H. -G., & Jin, L. (2020). Genomic and Metabolic Insights into Denitrification, Sulfur Oxidation, and Multidrug Efflux Pump Mechanisms in the Bacterium Rhodoferax sediminis sp. nov. Microorganisms, 8(2), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop