Next Article in Journal
Proteomic and Transcriptional Profiles of Human Stem Cell-Derived β Cells Following Enteroviral Challenge
Next Article in Special Issue
Activity of Cinnamaldehyde on Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Previous Article in Journal
Construction of a Tetracycline Degrading Bacterial Consortium and Its Application Evaluation in Laboratory-Scale Soil Remediation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reuterin Demonstrates Potent Antimicrobial Activity Against a Broad Panel of Human and Poultry Meat Campylobacter spp. Isolates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Discovery of Two Brominated Oxindole Alkaloids as Staphylococcal DNA Gyrase and Pyruvate Kinase Inhibitors via Inverse Virtual Screening

by
Ahmed M. Sayed
1,
Hani A. Alhadrami
2,3,
Seham S. El-Hawary
4,
Rabab Mohammed
5,
Hossam M. Hassan
5,
Mostafa E. Rateb
5,6,
Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen
7,8 and
Walid Bakeer
9,*
1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nahda University, Beni-Suef 62513, Egypt
2
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
3
King Fahd Medical Research Centre, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11787, Egypt
5
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt
6
School of Computing, Engineering & Physical Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK
7
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia 61519, Egypt
8
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Deraya University, Minia 61111, Egypt
9
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(2), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020293
Submission received: 4 December 2019 / Revised: 15 February 2020 / Accepted: 17 February 2020 / Published: 20 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Antimicrobial Compounds)

Abstract

:
In the present study, a small marine-derived natural products library was assessed for antibacterial potential. Among 36 isolated compounds, a number of bis-indole derivatives exhibited growth-inhibitory activity towards Gram-positive strains (Bacillus subtilis and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). 5- and 6-trisindoline (5-Tris and 6-Tris) were the most active derivatives (minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC, 4–8 µM) that were subsequently selected for anti-biofilm activity evaluation. Only 5-Tris was able to inhibit the staphylococcal biofilm formation starting at a 5 µM concentration. In order to investigate their possible molecular targets, both natural products were subjected to in silico inverse virtual screening. Among 20 target proteins, DNA gyrase and pyruvate kinase were the most likely to be involved in the observed antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of both selected natural products. The in vitro validation and in silico binding mode studies revealed that 5-Tris could act as a dual enzyme inhibitor (IC50 11.4 ± 0.03 and 6.6 ± 0.05 µM, respectively), while 6-Tris was a low micromolar gyrase-B inhibitor (IC50 2.1 ± 0.08 µM), indicating that the bromine position plays a crucial role in the determination of the antibacterial lead compound inhibitory activity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Staphylococci are considered dangerous opportunistic microorganisms, and are associated with many serious infections, including those that are hospital-acquired. In most cases of staphylococcal nosocomial infections, the isolated causative strains were found to be antibiotic-resistant [1,2,3]. The number of reported multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSA and MRSE, respectively) strains that show resistance against conventional antibiotics (e.g., macrolides and aminoglycosides) is on the rise. Additionally, their ability to protect themselves within biofilms on many different surfaces significantly contributes to antibiotic-resistance (i.e., phenotypic resistance) [4]. The limited effectiveness of standard antibiotics in dealing with biofilm-related infections, which increase the emergence of multidrug-resistant staphylococci, together with the increased dependence on implanted medical devices, drives the need for exploring and developing new classes of antimicrobials. Recently, pyruvate kinase (PK) has been identified as a crucial enzyme in staphylococci, and regulates their growth, antibiotic resistance, and biofilm formation [5,6,7]. Furthermore, it was found to be structurally distinct from human homologs, and hence it provides a promising target for novel antimicrobial agents [8,9]. On the other hand, DNA gyrase is a topoisomerase-type enzyme that is required during bacterial DNA replication and transcription to maintain topology and integrity. It consists of four subunits (two A subunits and two B subunits) attached together to form a tetrameric holoenzyme [10]. Currently, DNA gyrase is considered one of the primary targets and has been clinically validated in most pathogenic bacteria. Fluoroquinolones are well-known DNA gyrase inhibitors that target the enzyme’s A subunit specifically. They have achieved great success as antibacterial agents over the last 20 years; however, a number of resistant strains have emerged recently. Additionally, they are more active towards the Gram-negative bacteria in comparison with Gram-positive ones such as S. aureus and S. epidermidis [11]. Many research groups worldwide are focusing on the development of novel antibacterial drugs by targeting DNA gyrase B subunits [12,13,14]. Besides their bactericidal activity, DNA gyrase inhibitors have recently been identified as active anti-biofilm agents toward a wide range of pathogenic bacteria, most notably staphylococci (MRSA and MRSE) [15]. Natural products derived from marine sources have been showing promising pharmacological effects towards a wide array of molecular targets, and their unusual structural diversity provides a crucial source of lead compounds [16]. We previously reported a number of bioactive metabolites from the Red Sea-derived sponge Callyspongia siphonella and its associated microorganisms (Table S1) [17,18,19]. Notably, the two alkaloids, 5- and 6-bromotrisindoline (5-Tris and 6-Tris, respectively; Compounds 1 and 2, Figure 1) together with some phenolic acid derivatives (Compounds 16–27, Table S1) have shown in vitro antibacterial and antitrypanosomal activities, and cytotoxicity against several tumor cell lines. Moreover, the alkaloids saccharomonosporine A and convolutamydine F (Compounds 8 and 11) were identified as potent cytotoxic Pim-1 kinase inhibitors. In the present study, as part of our interest in the discovery of new drug leads from marine-derived natural products, we screened a small marine natural products library (Compounds 1–36, Table S1) to determine their potential as antibacterial and antibiofilm agents against staphylococci. Subsequently, the most active compounds were subjected to in silico inverse virtual screening and in vitro assays to detect their possible molecular targets. The working outline is depicted in Figure 2.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Library Construction

All compounds used in the present study (Compounds 1–36, Table S1, Supplementary Materials) were isolated from the Red Sea-derived sponge Callyspongia siphonella and its associated microorganisms using multiple chromatographic purification steps and using preparative HPLC (Agilent® 1260 Infinity, CA, USA) as a final step to obtain these compounds in pure form. The detailed procedure of compounds extraction and isolation were described previously [17,18,19]. All chemical structures of the isolated natural metabolites were determined by analysis of their spectral data (MS and NMR) and comparison with reported literature. The Bruker Avance III 400 MHz (Bruker AG, Switzerland) and Agilent series 1100 SL (Agilent CO, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were used to acquire the NMR and MS spectra, respectively. The produced library consisted of 15 indole derivatives, 12 phenolic derivatives, 6 steroidal compounds, 2 triterpenoid compounds, and 1 fatty acid.

2.2. Bacterial Strains

Four human pathogenic bacteria were used in this study, MRSA ATCC33591, Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A ATCC12228, Escherichia coli ATCC 259228, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC9027, in addition to the non-pathogenic Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis ATCC5230. All the bacterial strains were maintained at −80 °C in 15% glycerol nutrient broth (Oxoid, Milan, Italy).

2.3. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The twofold serial dilution approach was applied to determine the MICs of each compound. Each tested compound was dissolved in DMSO (Sigma, Milan, Italy) to prepare the test solutions. Many colonies of each tested bacterial strain were inoculated in 10 mL of sterilized Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) (Oxoid) and incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h. Subsequently, each bacterial suspension was adjusted to a final concentration of 100 cfu/mL (OD595 0.13–0.15); then 100 µL of the bacterial suspension were added in the 96-well cell culture plate (Cellstar®, Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany), with 0.5 to 128 µM of the test compound solutions. The optical density (595 nm) of every well was measured using a Multiscan Ex Microplate Reader (Thermo Scientific, Germany). MIC values were estimated as the lowermost compound concentration that inhibits the bacterial growth after 24 h of incubation. All data are reported as the mean of three independent experiments.

2.4. Biofilm Assay

The biofilm assay was performed in a 96-well polystyrene plate with a flat bottom according to the previously described method [2]. S. epidermidis RP62A (OD595 ~ 0.05 in TSB) was incubated in with 5-Tris and 6-Tris at different concentrations at 37 °C for 24 h. OD595 readings were used to estimate the MICs. Then, the test compound concentration where the lowest OD595 values were measured with no visible bacterial growth was used to calculate the MIC. After OD595 measurements, the bacterial cells were discarded by rinsing with sterile PBS. Then, the biofilm cells were fixed by heat at 65 °C for 1 h. Plates were subsequently stained with 0.3% crystal violet for 5 min, and then rinsed three times with sterile double-distilled water and air dried. Finally, OD492 values were used to determine the magnitude of biofilm inhibition in comparison with the control in test wells. S. epidermidis (ATCC12228) was used in the experiment as the biofilm negative strain.

2.5. In Vitro Enzymes Assay

DNA gyrase (type II topoisomerase) and topoisomerase IV (Topo IV; ParE) introduce negative supercoils into DNA, utilizing ATP hydrolysis as a source of energy. They are considered essential bacterial regulatory enzymes that are absent in eukaryotes. Gyrase subunit B (Gyr-B) and Topo IV inhibitory activities were determined using the Inspiralis assay kit (Inspiralis®, UK) on streptavidin-coated 96-well microtiter plates (Thermo Scientific, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocols [20]. The assay measures the ability of the tested compounds to inhibit the ATPase activity of both Gyr-B and ParE subunits. Briefly, the plates were hydrated with buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl with pH 7.6, 0.01% w/v BSA, 0.05% v/v Tween 20, 137 mM NaCl) and the biotinylated oligonucleotide was then immobilized. After the unbound oligonucleotide was washed out, the enzyme inhibitory assay was performed. The reaction volume of 30 μL in buffer (35 mM Tris × HCl with pH 7.5, 4 mM MgCl2, 24 mM KCl, 2 mM DTT, 1.8 mM spermidine, 1 mM ATP, 6.5 % w/v glycerol, 0.1 mg/mL albumin) contained 1.5 U of DNA gyrase or Topo IV from S. aureus, 0.75 μg of relaxed pNO1 plasmid, and 3 μL solution of the inhibitor in 10% DMSO and 0.008% Tween 20. Subsequently, the reaction solutions were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. At the end of the reaction, the TF buffer (50 mM NaOAc with pH 5.0, 50 mM NaCl, and 50 mM MgCl2) was added. After additional incubation for 30 min at room temperature, during which the biotinoligonucleotide-plasmid triplex was formed, the unbound plasmid was washed off using TF buffer (10 mM Tris HCl with pH 8.0 and 1 mM EDTA). The produced fluorescence was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek Synergy, excitation: 485 nm, emission: 535 nm, Germany). Initial screening was done at 100 or 10 μM concentration of inhibitors. PK has recently been discovered as an essential hub-protein in the interactome of MRSA [21]. The PK inhibitory activity of the tested compounds was determined according to the previously reported method [22]. Shortly, MRSA PK was expressed in pET-28a (+) as a recombinant protein in E. coli BL-21(DE3) and then purified by using Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) agarose (Quiagen, Inc., Germantown, MD). The PK activity was measured in a continuous assay coupled to lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in which the change in absorbance at 340 nm owing to the oxidation of NADH was measured by the microplate reader. The reaction mixture contained 60 mM Na+-HEPES (pH 7.5), 5% glycerol, 67 mM KCl, 6.7 mM MgCl2, 0.24 mM NADH, 5.5 units LDH from rabbit muscle (Sigma Aldrich), 2 mM ADP, and 10 mM PEP in a total volume of 200 mL. The reaction was initiated by addition of the PK (15 nM). Inhibitors were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with the final concentration of the solvent never exceeding 1% of the whole assay volume. IC50 values in both assays were determined using seven concentrations of tested compounds. GraphPad Prism software was used to calculate the IC50 values. The result was given as the average value of three independent measurements.
The inhibition constant Ki values for 5-Tris and 6-Tris were determined according to the manufacturer’s protocols, where the rate of chromogenic substrate hydrolysis, using 2 mM of the tested enzyme and 0–250 µM of the substrate, was monitored in increasing amounts of inhibitor (0–10 nM).

2.6. In Silico Inverse Screening

Well-characterized protein targets, known to be essential for Staphylococcus growth and biofilm formation, were selected in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) database. Subsequently, these targets were prepared by removing the water molecules and with the addition of polar hydrogens with Autodock Tools 1.4.5. Autodock Vina software was used for docking calculations. The grid volumes used for binding calculations were built using the co-crystallized ligands as a reference (Table S2, Supplementary Materials). An exhaustiveness of 16 was used for the docking studies. Autodock Vina results were analyzed with Pymol software.

2.7. Docking Analysis

Staphylococcal Gyr-B and PK crystal structures of the of PDB codes 3g7b and 3T0T, respectively, were used. Docking experiments were performed using AutoDock Vina docking software. Such docking engines deal with the receptor as a rigid structure and the ligand as a flexible structure during its calculations. The co-crystallized ligands were utilized to assign the binding sites. The ligand-to-binding-site shape matching root mean square threshold was set to 2.0 Å. The interaction energies were determined using the CFF force field (v.1.02) with 10.0 Å as a non-bonded cutoff distance and distance-dependent dielectric. Then, 5.0 Å was set as an energy grid extending from the binding site. The tested compounds were energy-minimized inside the selected binding pocket. The editing and visualization of the generated binding poses were performed using Pymol software.

2.8. ADME Studies

ADME profiling was measured in silico using the online website “http://www.swissadme.ch/”. Gastrointestinal (GIT) absorption, blood–brain barrier (BBB), solubility, bioavailability score, and inhibition of CYP2D6 were selected as ADME descriptors to be calculated.

2.9. Toxicity Profiling

Toxicity profiling was estimated using PreADMET software version 2.0. We screened the active compounds for carcinogenicity (rat and mouse), mutagenicity, and in vitro hERG inhibition (cardiotoxicity).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were performed in triplicates. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. p-Values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. GraphPad Prism® version 6.01 was used for the statistical analysis of experimental data.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Inhibitory Activity Screening

The antibacterial evaluation was performed for our small natural products library (Compounds 1–36, Table S1) in terms of MIC values in µM using standard antibacterial agents (ampicillin and gentamicin). The results of inhibitory evaluation along with our previous inhibitory reports on other bacterial strains [19] illustrated that a number of related indole derivatives were the only active compounds. The brominated oxindole derivatives, 5-bromotrisindoline and 6-bromotrisindoline (5-Tris and 6-Tris, respectively; Compounds 1 and 2; Table S1) were the most potent metabolites against Gram-positive bacterial MRSA (MIC 8 and 4 µM, respectively) and B. subtilis (MIC 4 and 4 µM/mL, respectively). The remaining compounds in this small compound library (phenolics, sterols, and triterpenes) were inactive against all tested organisms.

3.2. Antibiofilm Activity

To further evaluate the anti-biofilm activity of 5-Tris and 6-Tris in Gram-positive bacteria, they were tested at different concentrations against the reference strain S. epidermidis RP62A [2,22]. As shown in Figure 3, both molecules reduced the growth of an S. epidermidis standard strain in a dose-dependent manner. We found that 6-Tris has strong antibacterial activity only, where it inhibited the bacterial growth up to a 5-µM concentration. At lower concentrations, it did not show any effect on both growth and biofilm formation. On the other hand, 5-Tris revealed lower growth inhibitory activity, where it inhibited the bacterial growth starting at 20 µM. Moreover, it completely prevented both standard strains from forming their biofilm at sub-MIC concentrations until 5 µM. We can conclude from these results that 6-Tris is more potent than its isomer 5-Tris in terms of growth inhibitory activity (MIC 5 µM and 20 µM, respectively). However, 5-Tris demonstrated a significant antibiofilm activity with minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC) of 5 µM (0.25 MIC). Furthermore, the results suggested that the position of the bromine atom in 6-position favored the antibacterial activity; however, the 5- position favored the antibiofilm properties.

3.3. Structure–Activity Relationship (SAR) Study

From both the antibacterial (Table S1) and antibiofilm results (Figure 3), we can conclude that the bis-indole is an essential moiety for the antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria. The addition of an extra oxindole group to form a tris-indole scaffold doubled the antibacterial activity. Moreover, the presence of a bromine atom significantly increased the activity (4–8 fold). The 5-bromo derivative 5-Tris was the only active compound as a biofilm inhibitor, indicating that the position of the bromine in carbon 5 is essential for the antibiofilm activity (Figure 4). Both oxindoles (5-Tris and 6-Tris) may exhibit a narrow spectrum of antibacterial activity (Gram-positive only) as a result of being neutral compounds. Such molecules together with negatively charged ones were shown to be unable to cross the protective outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria [23]. Several previous studies have illustrated that the positively charged antibiotics, particularly those containing primary amine groups, accumulate preferentially in Gram-negative bacteria, and hence, during the future development of these lead compounds, their activity spectrum could be expanded through the addition of a suitable primary amine group [24].

3.4. Inverse Virtual Screening

Molecular docking studies were performed for both 5-Tris and 6-Tris to identify potential protein targets [25]. A number of molecular targets that are common in staphylococci [26,27] were downloaded from the protein database (PDB) and prepared for the docking experiment. Table 1 arranges the binding energies in kcal/mol of the two compounds against a list of possible targets. 5-Tris and 6-Tris showed the highest predicted affinity toward both DNA gyrase subunit B (Gyr B) and pyruvate kinase (PK) (binding energy of −7.3 and −9.9 kcal/mol for Gyr B, and −8.8 and −6.9 kcal/mol for PK, respectively) among the docked molecular targets, and hence they were selected for the subsequent in vitro evaluation.

3.5. In Vitro Assay

From the in silico screening results, we hypothesized that both Gyr B and PK could be potential targets for 5-Tris and 6-Tris. Inhibition of DNA gyrase subunit A (Gyr A) leads to direct cell death by trapping the gyrase–DNA complex. On the other hand, inhibition of Gyr B deprives the energy source needed for DNA replication [14]. Gyr B as a molecular target offers a chance to avoid the cross-resistance to the well-known Gyr A inhibitors, quinolones. PK is known to be a crucial enzyme that catalyzes the final glycolysis step, which includes a single phosphoryl group transfer from phosphoenolpyruvate to ADP, to produce a molecule of pyruvate and ATP [28]. Recently, it was considered as a “superhub” protein in S. aureus and was found to be essential for staphylococcal growth and biofilm formation [5,6,7]. In vitro studies (Table 2) showed 6-Tris to be a potent Gyr B inhibitor (IC50 2.1 ± 0.08 µM) with weak inhibitory activity against PK (IC50 23.2 ± 0.06 µM). On the other side, 5-Tris exhibited significant inhibitory activity against PK (IC50 6.6 ± 0.05 µM) and lower activity towards Gyr B (IC50 11.4 ± 0.03 µM) than 6-Tris. Regarding the enzyme affinity of both compounds (Table 2), 5-Tris showed much more affinity towards PK than 6-Tris (Ki: 5.6, 21.9 µM, respectively), but less affinity towards Gyr-B than 6-Tris (Ki: 7.75, 1.5 µM, respectively). These results clearly illustrated the role of the bromine position in the selectivity and potency of these inhibitors. Furthermore, they can suggest that the PK inhibition may have a direct link to the antibiofilm activity that was exhibited by 5-Tris. Earlier reports supported this point of view and explained the crucial role of PK in the staphylococcal biofilm formation [6]. To further validate the in silico prediction accuracy we tested 5-Tris and 6-Tris against staphylococcal topoisomerase IV (ParE, Topo IV), which has an essential role in DNA replication similar to DNA gyrase (Gyr-B), but showed significantly lower predicted binding affinity towards both 5-Tris and 6-Tris (Table 1). The assay results supported the predicted ones and revealed that both compounds have weak inhibitory activity against Topo IV, where 5-Tris and 6-Tris were 3 times and 12 times more active against Gyr-B than Topo IV, respectively (IC50 33.17 ± 0.04 and 25.14 ± 0.03 µM, respectively).

3.6. In Silico Binding Mode Study

The potential binding modes of 5-Tris and 6-Tris with both Gyr B and PK were analyzed by docking their active binding sites. MRSA Gyr B and PK of PDB code (3g7b and 3T0T) were chosen for the docking experiments due to their optimum resolutions (2.3 Å and 3.1 Å) and are co-crystallized with their inhibitors. The spheres around the co-crystallized inhibitors were assigned as binding sites for docking. Both 5-Tris and 6-Tris showed convergent docking poses (Figure 5) and were comparable to the co-crystallized Gyr-B inhibitor [29]. The indole nitrogen in only one indole group of the two 5-Tris indoles is hydrogen-bonded to the carbonyl oxygen of ASP-81, and the benzene moiety of the same indole is buried within a hydrophobic pocket of ILE-51, ILE-175, and LEU-103. Moreover, the carbonyl oxygen of the oxindole is hydrogen-bonded to the main chain carbonyl of GLY-85. The co-crystallized ligand forms a similar hydrogen bond with ASP-81 and a further two hydrogen bonds with a different amino acid residue, ASN-54. Alternatively, the existence of bromine in position 6 in 6-Tris directed the whole molecule toward a better binding mode and better fitting inside the binding pocket of Gyr-B (Figure 5). Both indole groups of the molecule became able to interact with the binding site’s residues, where the nitrogen of the first one is similarly hydrogen-bonded to the carbonyl and hydroxyl oxygen of ASP-81, and the nitrogen of the second indole is hydrogen-bonded to GLY-85. Furthermore, both the amidic hydrogen and the carbonyl oxygen of the oxindole moiety are tightly anchored inside the binding cavity through four hydrogen bonds with ASP-57 and GLU-58, respectively, and through the reported one with ASN-54. Such a strong interaction can explain the superior activity of 6-Tris (IC50 2.1 ± 0.08 µM) over 5-Tris (IC50 11.4 ± 0.03 µM) and the co-crystallized ligand. On the other hand, both 5-Tris and 6-Tris showed different binding modes in the PK active site. The co-crystalized PK inhibitor [21,30] is perfectly fitted inside the pocket formed between the enzyme’s subunits A and B (Figure 6). This binding mode is stabilized by six main hydrogen bonds with SER-362A, SER-362B, ASN-369B, and HIS-365A (A and B correspond to PK subunits). These residues provide target selectivity because they are conserved only in the staphylococcal PK and not found in the human PK. Herein, 5-Tris shows convergent binding mode to the co-crystallized PK inhibitor, where it anchors in one side of the PK active site (Figure 6) through three hydrogen bonds with SER-362A and HIS-365A, similarly to the co-crystalized ligand, and an additional hydrogen bond with THR-353A. Moreover, the 5-bromo group is further stabilized 5-Tris binding through the strong hydrophobic interaction with the hinge of LEU-368B, LYS-341B and LEU-344B (Figure 6). Regarding 6-Tris, again, the position of the bromine atom shows a vital role in the interaction with the active site. The bromine in 6-Tris directed the whole molecule to interact with the other side of the binding pocket (Figure 6), where the carbonyl oxygen of the oxindole moiety forms three weak hydrogen bonds (distance > 4 Å) with HIS-365B, THR-348B, and THR-353B, in addition to another weak hydrogen bond between the nitrogen of one indole moiety with SER-362B, and thus this weak interaction in comparison to 5-Tris explains the inferior activity against PK (5-Tris IC50 = 6.6 ± 0.05 µM; 6-Tris IC50 = 23.2 ± 0.06 µM).

3.7. In Silico ADME/Tox Prediction

The majority of drug candidates fail during the clinical development due to inappropriate ADME/Tox profiles, and hence, the virtual screening should not be limited to predicting and optimizing binding affinity of a given drug molecule, but the pharmacokinetic parameters should also be involved as significant filters to further optimize selected lead molecules into drug candidates, and reduce failure rates during clinical trials. The predicted ADMET/Tox profiles of 5-Tris and 6-Tris were calculated using the online software SwissADME and preADMET. Generally, both compounds showed excellent drug-like properties, high oral absorption, high bioavailability, and moderate toxicity (Table 3 and Table 4). Such predicted toxicity (e.g., the mutagenic and carcinogenic characteristics) of both compounds should be taken into consideration during their development, so that the possible future derivatives will be more efficient as therapeutic agents with minimal toxicity profiles.

4. Conclusions

Currently, much research is being directed toward the discovery of novel antimicrobial molecules that can act as biofilm inhibitors. Marine invertebrates are considered a prolific source of diverse pharmacologically active metabolites with different ecological potentials. In the present investigation, we prepared a small library of bioactive metabolites that were isolated from the marine-derived sponge C. siphonella and its associated symbiotic microbes. This library was screened against a panel of standard bacterial pathogens (two Gram-positive and two Gram-negative strains), including MRSA. Based on the obtained results, both 5-Tris and 6-Tris were the most active compounds and subsequently were selected for antibiofilm activity evaluation against a standard strain (S. epidermidis). Only 5-Tris was able to inhibit the ability of S. epidermidis to form its biofilm up to 5 µM. On the other hand, 6-Tris showed strong bacterial growth activity without biofilm inhibition. The antibacterial and antibiofilm results enabled us to construct a structure–activity relationship for the bis-indole scaffold. To investigate the possible molecular targets that may mediate these biological effects, we screened both 5-Tris and 6-Tris against a panel of selected targets (inverse virtual screening). This innovative in silico approach allowed us to prioritize Gyr-B and PK as the most promising candidates depending on the binding energy of each target protein. The in vitro assay thereafter revealed that 6-Tris is a potent Gyr-B inhibitor with weak activity against PK; however, 5-Tris is considered a dual inhibitor of both enzymes with a moderate potency. Additionally, the in silico ADME predictions suggested that both 5-Tris and 6-Tris have drug-like properties and could be promising leads for further evaluation. Further development and in vivo studies will be of interest to improve the potency and to assess the efficacy as well as the possible toxicity of these molecules.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/2/293/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.S., H.M.H., U.R.A.; methodology, A.M.S., W.B., and H.A.A.; data curation, all authors; original draft preparation, A.M.S.; writing, review and editing, S.S.E.-H., R.M., H.M.H., M.E.R., H.A.A., and U.R.A. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant No (DF-366-142-1441). The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge DSR technical and financial support.

Acknowledgments

The authors also like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University for their technical and financial support. We would also like to thank Wilma Ziebuhr and Gabriella Marincola, (University of Würzburg, Germany) for helping us in the antibiofilm activity evaluation, and both Julian Schmid and Stephanie Grond, (University of Tübingen, Germany) for their fruitful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manunga, J.; Olak, J.; Rivera, C.; Martin, M. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in elective surgical patients at a public teaching hospital: An analysis of 1039 patients. Am. Surg. 2012, 78, 1096–1099. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Khamash, D.F.; Voskertchian, A.; Tamma, P.D.; Akinboyo, I.C.; Carroll, K.C.; Milstone, A.M. Increasing clindamycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in pediatric Staphylococcus aureus infections. J. Ped. Infec. Dis. Soc. 2019, 8, 351–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Miguel, C.P.V.; Mejias, A.; Leber, A.; Sanchez, P.J. A decade of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: A single center experience. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Mittal, V. Biofilm and antimicrobial resistance. In Biofilms in Human Diseases: Treatment and Control; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 285–298. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhu, T.; Lou, Q.; Wu, Y.; Hu, J.; Yu, F.; Qu, D. Impact of the Staphylococcus epidermidis LytSR two-component regulatory system on murein hydrolase activity, pyruvate utilization and global transcriptional profile. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Vasu, D.; Sunitha, M.M.; Srikanth, L.; Swarupa, V.; Prasad, U.V.; Sireesha, K.; Sarma, P.V.G.K. In Staphylococcus aureus the regulation of pyruvate kinase activity by serine/threonine protein kinase favors biofilm formation. 3 Biotech 2015, 5, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Thomsen, I.P.; Liu, G.Y. Targeting fundamental pathways to disrupt Staphylococcus aureus survival: Clinical implications of recent discoveries. JCI Insight 2018, 3, 210–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zoraghi, R.; Worrall, L.; See, R.H.; Strangman, W.; Popplewell, W.L.; Gong, H.; Finlay, B.B. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pyruvate kinase as a target for bis-indole alkaloids with antibacterial activities. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 44716–44725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kumar, N.S.; Dullaghan, E.M.; Finlay, B.B.; Gong, H.; Reiner, N.E.; Selvam, J.J.P.; Zoraghi, R. Discovery and optimization of a new class of pyruvate kinase inhibitors as potential therapeutics for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 1708–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Janupally, R.; Medepi, B.; Brindha, P.; Suryadevara, P.; Jeankumar, V.U.; Kulkarni, P.; Sriram, D. Design and Biological Evaluation of Furan/Pyrrole/Thiophene-2-carboxamide Derivatives as Efficient DNA GyraseB Inhibitors of Staphylococcus aureus. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2015, 86, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pham, T.D.; Ziora, Z.M.; Blaskovich, M.A. Quinolone antibiotics. Med. Chem. Comm. 2019, 10, 1719–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tari, L.W.; Trzoss, M.; Bensen, D.C.; Li, X.; Chen, Z.; Lam, T.; Stidham, M. Pyrrolopyrimidine inhibitors of DNA gyrase B (GyrB) and topoisomerase IV (ParE). Part I: Structure guided discovery and optimization of dual targeting agents with potent, broad-spectrum enzymatic activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 1529–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tomasšicč, T.; Katsamakas, S.; Hodnik, Z.; Ilasš, J.; Brvar, M.; Solmajer, T.; Montalvão, S.; Paãvi, T.; Banjanac, M.; Ergović, G.; et al. Discovery of 4, 5, 6, 7-tetrahydrobenzo [1, 2-d] thiazoles as novel DNA gyrase inhibitors targeting the ATP-binding site. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 5501–5521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yi, L.; Lü, X. New Strategy on Antimicrobial-resistance: Inhibitors of DNA Replication Enzymes. Curr. Med. Chem. 2019, 26, 1761–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Masadeh, M.M.; Alzoubi, K.H.; Ahmed, W.S.; Magaji, A.S. In Vitro Comparison of Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activities of Selected Fluoroquinolones against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens 2019, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kobayashi, J. Search for new bioactive marine natural products and application to drug development. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 64, 1079–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. El-Hawary, S.S.; Sayed, A.; Mohammed, R.; Hassan, H.; Zaki, M.; Rateb, M.; Abdelmohsen, U. Epigenetic modifiers induce bioactive phenolic metabolites in the marine-derived fungus Penicillium brevicompactum. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. El-Hawary, S.S.; Sayed, A.M.; Mohammed, R.; Khanfar, M.; Rateb, M.E.; Mohammed, T.A.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. New Pim-1 kinase inhibitor from the co-culture of two sponge-associated actinomycetes. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 538–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. El-Hawary, S.S.; Sayed, A.M.; Mohammed, R.; Hassan, H.M.; Rateb, M.E.; Amin, E.; Wajant, H. Bioactive Brominated Oxindole Alkaloids from the Red Sea Sponge Callyspongia siphonella. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Durcik, M.; Tammela, P.; Barančoková, M.; Tomašič, T.; Ilaš, J.; Kikelj, D.; Zidar, N. Synthesis and Evaluation of N-Phenylpyrrolamides as DNA Gyrase B Inhibitors. Chem. Med. Chem. 2018, 13, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Axerio-Cilies, P.; See, R.H.; Zoraghi, R.; Worral, L.; Lian, T.; Stoynov, N.; Swayze, R. Cheminformatics-driven discovery of selective, nanomolar inhibitors for staphylococcal pyruvate kinase. ACS Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. El-Sayed, M.T.; Zoraghi, R.; Reiner, N.; Suzen, S.; Ohlsen, K.; Lalk, M.; Hilgeroth, A. Novel inhibitors of the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-pyruvate kinase. J. Enz. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016, 31, 1666–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Jones, S. Permeability rules for antibiotic design. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Huigens, R.W.; Morrison, K.C.; Hicklin, R.W.; Flood, T.A., Jr.; Richter, M.F.; Hergenrother, P.J. A ring-distortion strategy to construct stereochemically complex and structurally diverse compounds from natural products. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schoenfelder, S.M.; Lange, C.; Prakash, S.A.; Marincola, G.; Lerch, M.F.; Wencker, F.D.; Ziebuhr, W. The small non-coding RNA RsaE influences extracellular matrix composition in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm communities. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 15, e1007618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kitchen, D.B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J.R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 935–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ohlsen, K.; Lorenz, U. Novel targets for antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus. Future Microbiol. 2007, 2, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Foster, T.J. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Current status and future prospects. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 430–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ronkin, S.M.; Badia, M.; Bellon, S.; Grillot, A.L.; Gross, C.H.; Grossman, T.H.; Wei, Y. Discovery of pyrazolthiazoles as novel and potent inhibitors of bacterial gyrase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 2828–2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Suzuki, K.; Ito, S.; Shimizu-Ibuka, A.; Sakai, H. Crystal structure of pyruvate kinase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus. J. Biochem. 2008, 144, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Some examples of marine-derived indole compounds.
Figure 1. Some examples of marine-derived indole compounds.
Microorganisms 08 00293 g001
Figure 2. Outline of the procedure used in this study. SAR: structure–activity relationship.
Figure 2. Outline of the procedure used in this study. SAR: structure–activity relationship.
Microorganisms 08 00293 g002
Figure 3. Inhibition of biofilm formation and planktonic growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A by (A) 5-trisindoline (5-Tris) and (B) 6-trisindoline (6-Tris). OD: Optical Density.
Figure 3. Inhibition of biofilm formation and planktonic growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A by (A) 5-trisindoline (5-Tris) and (B) 6-trisindoline (6-Tris). OD: Optical Density.
Microorganisms 08 00293 g003
Figure 4. Structure–activity relationship of the bioactive indole compounds. PK: pyruvate kinase; Gyr-B: gyrase subunit B.
Figure 4. Structure–activity relationship of the bioactive indole compounds. PK: pyruvate kinase; Gyr-B: gyrase subunit B.
Microorganisms 08 00293 g004
Figure 5. Docking study of 5-Tris (A,B) and 6-Tris (C,D) within the active site of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Gyr-B. The key binding interactions of the Gyr-B co-crystallized ligand [29] are shown in (E,F). The amino acid side chains are depicted in (A,C,E) for clarification.
Figure 5. Docking study of 5-Tris (A,B) and 6-Tris (C,D) within the active site of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Gyr-B. The key binding interactions of the Gyr-B co-crystallized ligand [29] are shown in (E,F). The amino acid side chains are depicted in (A,C,E) for clarification.
Microorganisms 08 00293 g005
Figure 6. Docking study of 5-Tris (A,B) and 6-Tris (C,D) within the active site of MRSA PK. The key binding interactions of the PK co-crystallized ligand [21] are shown in (E,F). The amino acid side chains are depicted in (A,C,E) for clarification.
Figure 6. Docking study of 5-Tris (A,B) and 6-Tris (C,D) within the active site of MRSA PK. The key binding interactions of the PK co-crystallized ligand [21] are shown in (E,F). The amino acid side chains are depicted in (A,C,E) for clarification.
Microorganisms 08 00293 g006
Table 1. Binding energies (kcal/mol) of 5-Tris and 6-Tris against a number of possible staphylococcal targets.
Table 1. Binding energies (kcal/mol) of 5-Tris and 6-Tris against a number of possible staphylococcal targets.
Molecular TargetFunctionMode of ActionBinding Energy (5-Tris)Binding Energy (6-Tris)
FtsZGTPaseCell division−6.3−6.0
PKPyruvate kinaseGlycolysis−8.8−6.9
SpsBSignal PeptidaseProtein secretion−3.9−5.0
Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetaseProtein biosynthesisProtein modification−5.3−4.0
PdfPeptide deformylaseProtein modification−5.8−4.9
Peptidyl transferaseProtein biosynthesisProtein modification3.94.1
rRNA methyltransferaseProtein biosynthesisProtein modification−4.2−5.5
Threonyl−tRNA synthetaseProtein biosynthesisProtein modification−5.1−5.2
Gyr ADNA gyraseDNA replication−4.3−4.8
Gyr BDNA gyraseDNA replication−7.3−9.9
ParETopoisomerase IVDNA replication−5.4−5.1
DdlD-alanine ligasePeptidoglycan synthesis−4.1−4.8
MurBUDP-N-acetylglucosamine-enolpyruvyl reductasePeptidoglycan synthesis−6.1−5.5
PBP2Peptidoglycan glycosyl transferasePeptidoglycan synthesis−3.6−3.8
DHFRDihydrofolate reductaseCellular regulation−6.9−6.1
YycG/YycFAutolysisCellular regulation−6.7−6.2
FabFB-ketoacyl-synthase I/IIFatty acid synthesis−3.6−3.5
FabIEnoly-acyl-carrier protein reductaseFatty acid synthesis−4.3−4.2
LigADNA ligaseStress response−7.0−6.1
TrxBThioredoxin reductaseStress response−5.9−5.0
Table 2. MRSA DNA gyrase-B, pyruvate kinase, and topoisomerase IV inhibitions as IC50 and inhibition constant Ki values.
Table 2. MRSA DNA gyrase-B, pyruvate kinase, and topoisomerase IV inhibitions as IC50 and inhibition constant Ki values.
Tested CompoundIC50 (Ki) ± S.D. µM a
DNA GyrasePyruvate KinaseTopoisomerase IV
5-Tris11.4 ± 0.03 (Ki: 7.75 ± 0.05)6.6 ± 0.05 (Ki: 5.6 ± 0.02)33.17 ± 0.04
6-Tris2.1 ± 0.08 (Ki: 1. 5 ± 0.03)23.2 ± 0.06 (Ki: 21.9 ± 0.04)25.14 ± 0.03
Novobiocin0.12 ± 0.01*0.22 ± 0.01
a Values are the mean of three independent experiments. *—not determined.
Table 3. Predicted ADME profiles of 5-Tris and 6-Tris.
Table 3. Predicted ADME profiles of 5-Tris and 6-Tris.
CompoundLipinski aBBB bGIT Absorption cSolubility dCYP2D6 eBioavailability Score f
5-TrisYesYesHighModerateYes0.55
6-TrisYesYesHighModerateYes0.55
a Predicts if the compound has a drug-like properties (follows the Lipinski rule of five); b Predicts the ability of the compound to penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) according to the yolk of the boiled egg; c Predicts the gastrointestinal absorption according to the white of the boiled egg; d Predicts the solubility of each compound in water; e Predicts the cytochrome P450 inhibition; f Predicts the bioavailability score.
Table 4. Predicted toxicity profile of 5-Tris and 6-Tris.
Table 4. Predicted toxicity profile of 5-Tris and 6-Tris.
Compound5-Tris6-Tris
MutagenicityMutagenMutagen
Carcinogenicity (mouse)PositivePositive
Carcinogenicity (rat)NegativeNegative
hERG inhibition (cardiotoxicity)AmbiguousModerate Risk

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sayed, A.M.; Alhadrami, H.A.; El-Hawary, S.S.; Mohammed, R.; Hassan, H.M.; Rateb, M.E.; Abdelmohsen, U.R.; Bakeer, W. Discovery of Two Brominated Oxindole Alkaloids as Staphylococcal DNA Gyrase and Pyruvate Kinase Inhibitors via Inverse Virtual Screening. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020293

AMA Style

Sayed AM, Alhadrami HA, El-Hawary SS, Mohammed R, Hassan HM, Rateb ME, Abdelmohsen UR, Bakeer W. Discovery of Two Brominated Oxindole Alkaloids as Staphylococcal DNA Gyrase and Pyruvate Kinase Inhibitors via Inverse Virtual Screening. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sayed, Ahmed M., Hani A. Alhadrami, Seham S. El-Hawary, Rabab Mohammed, Hossam M. Hassan, Mostafa E. Rateb, Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen, and Walid Bakeer. 2020. "Discovery of Two Brominated Oxindole Alkaloids as Staphylococcal DNA Gyrase and Pyruvate Kinase Inhibitors via Inverse Virtual Screening" Microorganisms 8, no. 2: 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020293

APA Style

Sayed, A. M., Alhadrami, H. A., El-Hawary, S. S., Mohammed, R., Hassan, H. M., Rateb, M. E., Abdelmohsen, U. R., & Bakeer, W. (2020). Discovery of Two Brominated Oxindole Alkaloids as Staphylococcal DNA Gyrase and Pyruvate Kinase Inhibitors via Inverse Virtual Screening. Microorganisms, 8(2), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop