Next Article in Journal
High Content Analysis of Macrophage-Targeting EhPIb-Compounds against Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmania Species
Next Article in Special Issue
CD4+ and CD8+ Circulating Memory T Cells Are Crucial in the Protection Induced by Vaccination with Salmonella Typhi Porins
Previous Article in Journal
Improvement of Fermentation Quality in the Fermented Total Mixed Ration with Oat Silage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Control of Salmonella and Pathogenic E. coli Contamination of Animal Feed Using Alternatives to Formaldehyde-Based Treatments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Natural Antimicrobials Suitable for Combating Desiccation-Resistant Salmonella enterica in Milk Powder

by
Ahmed G. Abdelhamid
1,2 and
Ahmed E. Yousef
1,3,*
1
Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, 2015 Fyffe Court, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Benha University, Benha 13518, Egypt
3
Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, 105 Biological Sciences Building, 484 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(2), 421; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020421
Submission received: 17 January 2021 / Revised: 4 February 2021 / Accepted: 14 February 2021 / Published: 18 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Salmonella and Salmonellosis)

Abstract

:
Some Salmonella enterica strains survive well in low-water activity (low-aw) foods and cause frequent salmonellosis outbreaks in these products. Methods are needed to overcome such desiccation-resistant Salmonella and to improve the safety of low-aw foods. Building on a recent finding, we hypothesized that natural antimicrobial food additives, which are active against cytoplasmic membrane, could overcome this desiccation resistance phenomenon, and thus, sensitize the pathogen to drying and mild processing. Food additives were screened for the ability to cause leakage of intracellular potassium ions; retention of these ions is vital for protecting Salmonella against desiccation. Two antimicrobial food additives, carvacrol and thymol, caused considerable potassium leakage from the desiccation-resistant S. enterica serovars, Tennessee and Livingstone. Thus, carvacrol and thymol were investigated for their ability to sensitize the desiccation-adapted S. enterica to heat treatment. The combined use of food additives, at their minimum inhibitory concentrations, with heat treatment at 55 °C for 15 min caused 3.1 ± 0.21 to more than 5.5 log colony forming unit (CFU)/mL reduction in desiccation-adapted S. enterica, compared to 2.4 ± 0.53–3.2 ± 0.11 log CFU/mL reduction by sole heat treatment. Carvacrol was the additive that caused the greatest potassium leakage and sensitization of Salmonella to heat; hence, the application of this compound was investigated in a food model against Salmonella Typhimurium ASD200. Addition of carvacrol at 200 or 500 ppm into liquid milk followed by spray-drying reduced the strain’s population by 0.9 ± 0.02 and 1.3 ± 0.1 log CFU/g, respectively, compared to 0.6 ± 0.02 log CFU/g reduction for non-treated spray-dried milk. Additionally, freeze-drying of milk treated with high levels of carvacrol (5000 ppm) reduced the population of Salmonella Typhimurium ASD200 by more than 4.5 log CFU/g, compared to 1.1 ± 0.4 log CFU/g reduction for the freeze-dried untreated milk. These findings suggest that carvacrol can combat desiccation-resistant S. enterica, and thus, potentially improve the safety of low-aw foods.

1. Introduction

Low-water activity (low-aw) foods are shelf-stable products with an aw of less than 0.85; these include nuts and nut products, honey, spices, dried fruits, and others [1]. In the past two decades, there has been a noticeable increase in the incidence of disease outbreaks linked to low-aw foods such as cereals, nut butter and crackers [2,3,4]. It is estimated that 45% of these outbreaks and the majority of hospitalizations (89%) and deaths (74%), linked to low-aw foods are caused by various Salmonella enterica serovars [5]. S. enterica may adapt to the dry conditions in these foods and become desiccation-resistant. This adaptation not only allows pathogen cells to survive for long periods in low-aw foods, but also cross-protects these cells against lethal steps in product processing [6].
Despite the progress in assessing the risk of salmonellosis associated with low-aw foods, limited literature addressed strategies to disrupt the desiccation resistance once it is acquired by S. enterica. Researchers have proposed increasing process lethality (e.g., elevating heat-treatments) to overcome Salmonella in low-aw foods [7]. However, the severity of these treatments is likely to damage the quality of the final product. Hence, our goal was to explore methods to overcome desiccation-resistant Salmonella without excessive processing. In a previous study, we found that a newly discovered microbial lipopeptide, paenibacterin, disrupted the desiccation resistance in S. enterica and rendered the pathogen sensitive to desiccation [8]. Paenibacterin caused intracellular potassium leakage, increased the cytoplasmic membrane permeability, decreased the biosynthesis of the osmoprotectant trehalose, and downregulated the expression of desiccation-related genes in desiccation-adapted S. enterica. Building on these findings, we hypothesized that food additives that are active against bacterial cytoplasmic membranes are likely to compromise the desiccation resistance in S. enterica. Such additives would revert the bacterium to its desiccation-sensitive status, and thus, enhance lethality by mild processing technologies. To test this hypothesis, the current study was initiated to (a) screen selected food additives for their ability to compromise the desiccation-resistance in S. enterica and (b) assess the ability of a membrane-active additive to inactivate S. enterica during milk spray-drying and freeze-drying. Desiccation-resistant Salmonella can survive in milk powder and pose food safety risk [9,10,11,12,13]. Therefore, milk powder is an appropriate model to evaluate methods to combat desiccation-resistant Salmonella.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Preparation of the Test Food Additives

Ten food additives were screened for ability to cause potassium leakage from desiccation-adapted S. enterica. Carvacrol and thymol (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were dissolved in 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma Aldrich). Eugenol, trans-cinnamaldehyde, vanillin, diacetyl, and catechin hydrate (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) were dissolved in 85% ethanol (Fisher Scientific). Benzoic, lactic, and citric acids (Fisher Scientific) were dissolved in sterile water. Five percent DMSO in saline (NaCl; 0.85% wt/vol), ethanol (85% vol/vol), or deionized water was used as the additive-free control, depending on the solvent used in a given treatment.

2.2. Bacterial Strains

The S. enterica serovars used in this study are: (a) S. enterica serovar Tennessee E2007000304, a known desiccation-resistant serovar that was isolated originally from peanut butter [14], (b) S. enterica serovar Livingstone 1236H (formerly known as Eimsbuettel 1236H [8,15,16]), a peanut butter isolate [17], and (c) S. enterica serovar Typhimurium ASD200. The latter is a genetically engineered mutant that was modified (Δ Salmonella pathogenicity island [SPI] I and Δ SP2) to an avirulent strain [18]. The strain ASD200 was used only for the spray-drying and freeze-drying experiments. Each serovar was grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB; BD, Sparks, MD, USA) at 37 °C for 18 h before being subjected to desiccation adaptation.

2.3. Preparation of Desiccation-Adapted S. enterica Serovars

Desiccation-adapted Salmonella serovars were prepared as described in previous studies [8,19] with modifications. Briefly, S. enterica serovars were grown overnight in TSB (BD) at 37 °C to a cell density of 109 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL as determined by plating on Tryptic Soy agar (TSA; BD). Cells of the obtained cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 4 °C and 104 × g for 5 min and resuspended in fresh TSB. Aliquots (1 mL) of the cell suspension were dispensed in plastic Petri dishes (90-mm diameter; VWR International, Chicago, IL, USA), with a final population of ca. 109 CFU per plate, and air-dried in a biosafety cabinet for 24 h at 22–25 °C under circa 40% relative humidity to prepare desiccation-adapted dry cells. The dried cells were collected and resuspended in saline (0.85% NaCl) to obtain desiccation-adapted cell suspension (DACS).

2.4. Potassium Ion Release Assay

Release of potassium ions was determined using a potassium-binding benzofuran isophthalate probe (PBFI; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as described previously [8]. Briefly, DACS of Salmonella Tennessee and Livingstone were centrifuged and the cell pellets were resuspended in 5 mM HEPES buffer (Sigma Aldrich) supplemented with 5 mM glucose (Fisher Scientific). Aliquots (90 µL) of the resuspended cells were added to wells of a black, nonbinding-surface, 96-well microplate (Corning, Tewksbury, MA, USA). The potassium probe was dispensed to each well at a final concentration of 2 µM before the addition of 10 µL of the food additives, which were prepared as described in a previous section. The food additives were applied at different concentrations (Figure 1) that ranged from sublethal to lethal levels that were reported in previous studies [20,21,22,23,24,25,26] except carvacrol and thymol, which were applied based on their MIC levels determined in the current study. Polymyxin at 10 ppm was used as a positive control. Fluorescence, corresponding to potassium ions concentration, was measured using a microplate reader (Perkin-Elmer, Wellesley, MA, USA) at excitation and emission wavelength of 346 or 505 nm, respectively. Fluorescence measurements were normalized by removing the background fluorescence noise.

2.5. Determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

Two food additives, namely carvacrol and thymol, showed significant potassium leakage from Salmonella cells. Before these compounds were used for the heat treatment and food application studies, their MICs against S. enterica serovars were determined using the broth microdilution method [27]. Briefly, two-fold serial dilutions of carvacrol and thymol, at final concentrations of 800, 400, 200, 100, and 50 ppm, were prepared before 50-µL aliquots of these preparations were dispensed into the 96-well plates (Corning); this was followed by adding equal volume of Salmonella Tennessee or Livingstone culture suspension, which was adjusted to OD600 of 0.01 in TSB (BD Diagnostic). The MIC of each compound was determined as the lowest concentration, which completely inhibited the visible growth of S. enterica after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C.

2.6. Treatment of Salmonella Serovars with Additive-Heat Combination

Carvacrol and thymol were assessed for their capability to sensitize Salmonella serovars to mild heat treatment at 55 °C for 15 min. Briefly, 5 mL Salmonella Tennessee or Livingstone DACSs were treated with carvacrol, or thymol at their MIC (200 and 100 ppm, respectively), while untreated S. enterica DACS served as a heated control. Treated and untreated S. enterica cells were incubated in a pre-heated water bath at 55 °C for 15 min, plus circa 2.5 min as the sample temperature come-up time. After the thermal treatment, all tubes were removed and held on ice before counts of Salmonella survivors were determined using standard plating on TSA (BD).

2.7. Inactivation of S. enterica in Milk during Spray-Drying

Carvacrol was selected for applications in milk, as a model food, because of the superior ability of the additive to induce potassium leakage and its ability to sensitize S. enterica cells to heat. DACS of Salmonella Typhimurium ASD200 was added into 100 mL of liquid milk (Horizon; Organic low-fat milk, obtained for a local supermarket), and a final population of ~106 CFU/mL milk was achieved. Carvacrol at levels of 200 or 500 ppm was added to the milk samples inoculated with S. enterica cells, while carvacrol-free inoculated milk samples served as untreated control. Treated and untreated milk samples were dried using a spray dryer (Yamato Scientific Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 180 °C and 50 °C for inlet and outlet temperatures, respectively, and a feed flow rate of 10 mL of liquid milk per min. Viable counts of Salmonella Typhimurium was determined by plating on the selective agar medium, xylose lysine tergitol–4 (XLT4; BD), before and immediately after spray-drying, and after 1-day storage of the spray-dried milk at 22–25 °C. S. enterica populations were determined as CFU/g milk solids. Total milk solids were determined by drying portions of the liquid or spray-dried milk samples on glass fiber pads for 3 min, in a microwave oven, as described previously [28] and the percentage of total solids were calculated from the formula:
T o t a l   s o l i d s   %   =   weight   of   dry   milk   sample weight   of   wet   milk   sample   ×   100

2.8. Inactivation of S. enterica in Milk during Freeze-Drying

Liquid milk samples (Horizon) were inoculated with Salmonella Typhimurium ASD200 to achieve final cell density of 107 CFU/mL before adding carvacrol at 200, 500, or 5000 ppm. The highest concentration tested (5000 ppm) was applied to enable significant reduction of Salmonella during freeze-drying. Untreated milk (0 ppm carvacrol) served as a control. All milk samples were frozen at −80 °C for 16–18 h before being dried for 48 h using a freeze dryer (Labconco, Kansas, MO, USA). Freeze-dried milk samples were stored for 2 days at 22–25 °C to measure S. enterica survivors during storage. Salmonella viable counts were determined as CFU/g milk solids before, and immediately following freeze-drying, and on a daily basis during storage of the freeze-dried milk.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate and independently repeated two times, unless indicated otherwise. Bacterial populations were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine significant differences between treatment groups or Student’s t-test to compare pairs of treatment. The statistical analysis was completed using a statistical software (SPSS; IBM, New York, NY, USA) and a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Screening Food Additives for the Ability to Disrupt Desiccation Resistance in Salmonella

In a previous study, the membrane-active antimicrobial peptide, paenibacterin, disrupted the desiccation resistance mechanisms and sensitized S. enterica serovars to desiccation [8]. Therefore, we explored a similar effect in 10 food additives recognized to exert antimicrobial activity by acting on the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane [29]; these additive are also known to possess the “Generally Regarded As Safe” (GRAS) status. The concentration of additives used encompassed their MIC as reported previously or determined in the current study (Table 1).
The selected food additives were screened for ability to release K+ ions from desiccation-adapted S. enterica cells. Out of 10 antimicrobial food additives tested, carvacrol and thymol were the most capable of inducing potassium leakage in desiccation-adapted Salmonella Tennessee and Livingstone, as shown in Figure 1. Leakage of potassium ions, caused by carvacrol or thymol treatment, may indicate that Salmonella has lost one of its important protective factors required for adapting to desiccation [8,19]. If this is the case, treated Salmonella becomes sensitive to heat processing and drying stress. Moreover, leakage of intracellular potassium could make the bacterium unable to survive the dry environment during storage of contaminated low-aw food products. These hypotheses were tested in the following experiments.

3.2. Sensitizing Desiccation-Resistant Salmonella to Heat Treatment Using Selected Food Additives

Carvacrol and thymol were investigated at their MIC (200 and 100 ppm, respectively) in combination with heat treatment at 55 °C for 15 min against desiccation-adapted Salmonella Tennessee and Livingstone. Carvacrol, combined with heat treatment, caused reduction of the population of desiccation-adapted Salmonella Tennessee by more than 5.5 log CFU/mL, whereas the heat treatment alone caused 3.2 ± 0.11 log CFU/mL reduction (Figure 2A). For Salmonella Livingstone, carvacrol combined with heat reduced the pathogen by 4.1 ± 0.21 log CFU/mL compared to the heat treatment alone that caused 2.4 ± 0.53 log CFU/mL reduction (Figure 2B). On the other hand, thymol-heat treatment reduced Salmonella Tennessee and Livingstone populations by 4.3 ± 0.22 and 3.1 ± 0.9 log CFU/mL, respectively (Figure 2A,B), compared to the heat treatment alone (3.2 ± 0.11 and 2.4 ± 0.53 log CFU/mL reduction for Tennessee and Livingstone, respectively). These findings indicate that combining food additives with heat is more lethal (p < 0.05) than applying heat individually and that serovar Tennessee is more sensitive than Livingstone to this treatment combination. The synergistic effect of carvacrol or thymol with heat could be attributed to the ability of the antimicrobial compounds to damage the cytoplasmic membrane of Salmonella cells and further affect the equilibrium of the inorganic ions and induce cell injury [30]. The injury of Salmonella by these additives made the bacterium sensitive to heat stress which can damage critical cellular macromolecules, particularly proteins [31]. It is likely that leakage of K+ and other osmoprotectans increased intracellular water availability, which, in turn, increases the sensitivity of cellular proteins to heat.

3.3. Inactivation of S. enterica in Milk during Spray-Drying

Carvacrol was investigated for the ability to sensitize Salmonella Typhimurium ASD200 to spray-drying. The strain ASD200 has been genetically modified through deletion of SPI–1 and SPI–2, and thus, it is suitable for safe use in drying experiments. Carvacrol at 200 or 500 ppm significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the viability of the desiccation-adapted strain ASD200 in response to spray-drying, compared to the carvacrol-free control. This effect was observed after 1-day storage of the spray-dried milk at room temperature (Table 2). In contrast, when Salmonella populations were determined in the milk powder immediately following spray-drying, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was detected between carvacrol-treated or untreated milk. Overall, the results suggest that carvacrol-treated Salmonella cells did not implement desiccation resistance in the spray-dried milk during storage, and thus, became dehydration-sensitive. This explanation is supported by a previous finding that pretreatment of desiccation-adapted Salmonella with the membrane-active paenibacterin sensitized the cells to subsequent 24 h of desiccation at room temperature [8].

3.4. Inactivation of S. enterica in Milk during Freeze-Drying

Freeze-drying is a dehydration process that is used for preservation of many foods such as fruits, seafood, coffee, and others [32]. In the current study, carvacrol at different concentrations (200, 500, and 5000 ppm) was added into liquid milk to sensitize Salmonella Typhimurium ASD200 to the dehydration stress mediated by freeze-drying. Compared to the carvacrol-free freeze-dried milk, samples with carvacrol at 5000 ppm decreased Salmonella Typhimurium population below the detection limit of the enumeration method, which was 3 log CFU/g milk (Figure 3). This population reduction was observed immediately following freeze-drying and during the 2-day storage of the dried milk at 22–25 °C. In contrast, treatment with carvacrol at 200 or 500 ppm did not significantly (p > 0.05) reduce Salmonella levels in the freeze-dried product, compared to the carvacrol-free control (Figure 3).
To determine whether the anti-Salmonella activity observed by the combination of carvacrol (at 5000 ppm) and freeze-drying was a synergistic effect between the two lethal factors, a treatment using 5000 ppm carvacrol without freeze-drying was conducted. As shown in Table 3, it was obvious that Salmonella Typhimurium survivors were lower following treatment with carvacrol and freeze-drying combination than they were when carvacrol alone was applied. Results from the drying experiments imply that higher concentration of carvacrol (≥10-fold) was required to decrease Salmonella populations during freeze-drying, compared to that used in the spray-drying. These findings are plausible considering that spray-drying includes heat; therefore, the bacterium suffered thermal and dehydration stresses, whereas freeze-drying caused dehydration stress only.
Based on these findings, the inclusion of the membrane-active food additive, carvacrol, during drying is advantageous since the compound manipulates Salmonella’s physiology in a manner that disrupts the desiccation resistance in pathogen cells. The additive pre-treatment made it easy to inactivate Salmonella cells by mild processing such as drying, a process which was also recognized to cause cell death of S. enterica by increasing cytoplasmic membrane permeabilization [33]. An additional advantage is that the application of the antimicrobial food additive carvacrol at 5000 ppm with freeze-drying caused more than 4.5 log CFU/g reduction in S. enterica. Comparably, a similar reduction in Salmonella populations was achieved in non-fat dry milk by applying high temperature (115 °C for 1 h), but this heat treatment impaired the color and gave the powder a burned appearance [34]. Therefore, targeting the cytoplasmic membrane by the membrane-active carvacrol prior to drying is a valuable approach considering it helps overcoming Salmonella desiccation resistance and sensitizes the pathogen to the drying processing. The process is also likely to have minimal impact on the milk sensory characteristics, albeit this effect was not tested in the current study.

4. Conclusions

The natural antimicrobials, carvacrol and thymol, decreased desiccation resistance in S. enterica via induction of intracellular potassium leakage, and this sensitized the pathogen to heat stress. For translating these findings in a food model, the presence of carvacrol during dehydrating liquid milk using freeze- or spray-drying increased the process lethality. Carvacrol is a commercially available GRAS additive, and its use can protect against S. enterica contamination and improve the safety of low-aw foods. Future research is needed to determine the effectiveness of carvacrol against desiccation-resistant S. enterica in various foods having limited water availability. These are not limited to dehydrated products; it also included frozen foods. Additionally, usage of carvacrol should be optimized to minimize any undesirable sensory changes in treated products.

Author Contributions

A.G.A.: research conceptualization and design, experimental analysis, and manuscript writing. A.E.Y.: research design, manuscript writing and reviewing, and project management. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support was provided by the Center for Advanced Processing and Packaging Studies, a National Science Foundation Industry—University Cooperative Research Center.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beuchat, L.R.; Komitopoulou, E.; Beckers, H.; Betts, R.P.; Bourdichon, F.; Fanning, S.; Joosten, H.M.; Ter Kuile, B.H. Low–water activity foods: Increased concern as vehicles of foodborne pathogens. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 150–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Russo, E.T.; Biggerstaff, G.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Meyer, S.; Patel, N.; Miller, B.; Quick, R. A recurrent, multistate outbreak of Salmonella serotype Agona infections associated with dry, unsweetened cereal consumption, United States, 2008. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA Investigated multistate outbreak of Salmonella infections linked to raw nut butter products | FDA, 2014. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/food/outbreaks-foodborne-illness/fda-investigated-multistate-outbreak-salmonella-infections-linked-raw-nut-butter-products (accessed on 15 December 2020).
  4. FDA. Recalls, Market Withdrawals & Safety Alerts. 2018. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/safety/archive-recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/2018-recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts (accessed on 15 December 2020).
  5. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO); World Health Organization (WHO). Ranking of Low Moisture Foods in Support of Microbiological Risk Management. Report of an FAO/WHO Consultation Process, 2014. Available online: http://www.fao.org/tempref/codex/Meetings/CCFH/ccfh46/FAO_WHO%20Presentation%20on%20LMF%20ranking.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2020).
  6. Finn, S.; Condell, O.; McClure, P.; Amézquita, A.; Fanning, S. Mechanisms of survival, responses, and sources of Salmonella in low-moisture environments. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Ma, L.; Zhang, G.; Gerner-Smidt, P.; Mantripragada, V.; Ezeoke, I.; Doyle, M.P. Thermal inactivation of Salmonella in Peanut Butter. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 1596–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdelhamid, A.G.; Yousef, A.E. The microbial lipopeptide paenibacterin disrupts desiccation resistance in Salmonella enterica serovars Tennessee and Eimsbuettel. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Lian, F.; Zhao, W.; Yang, R.; Tang, Y.; Katiyo, W. Survival of Salmonella enterica in skim milk powder with different water activity and water mobility. Food Control 2015, 47, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Angulo, F.J.; Cahill, S.M.; Wachsmuth, I.K.; Costarrica, M.D.L.; Embarek, P.K.B. Powdered infant formula as a source of Salmonella infection in infants. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rowe, B.; Hutchinson, D.N.; Gilbert, R.J.; Hales, B.H.; Begg, N.T.; Dawkins, H.C.; Jacob, M.; Rae, F.A.; Jepson, M. Salmonella Ealing infections associated with consumption of infant dried milk. Lancet 1987, 330, 900–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jourdan-da Silva, N.; Fabre, L.; Robinson, E.; Fournet, N.; Nisavanh, A.; Bruyand, M.; Mailles, A.; Serre, E.; Ravel, M.; Guibert, V.; et al. Ongoing nationwide outbreak of Salmonella Agona associated with internationally distributed infant milk products, France, December 2017. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Louie, K.K.; Paccagnella, A.M.; Osei, W.D.; Lior, H.; Francis, B.J.; Osterholm, M.T. Salmonella serotype Tennessee in powdered milk products and infant formula--Canada and United States, 1993. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1993, 270, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Enache, E.; Kataoka, A.; Black, D.G.; Napier, C.D.; Podolak, R.; Hayman, M.M. Development of a dry inoculation method for thermal challenge studies in low-moisture foods by using Talc as a carrier for Salmonella and a surrogate (Enterococcus faecium). J. Food Prot. 2015, 78, 1106–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Abdelhamid, A.G.; Yousef, A.E. Collateral adaptive responses induced by desiccation stress in Salmonella enterica. LWT 2020, 133, 110089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abdelhamid, A.G.; Xu, Y.; Yousef, A.E. Draft genome sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Livingstone 1236H, a desiccation-resistant strain that poses a salmonellosis hazard in low-moisture foods. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2021, 10, e01197-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peña-Meléndez, M.; Perry, J.J.; Yousef, A.E. Changes in thermal resistance of three Salmonella serovars in response to osmotic shock and adaptation at water activities reduced by different humectants. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 914–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Sabag-Daigle, A.; Blunk, H.M.; Gonzalez, J.F.; Steidley, B.L.; Boyaka, P.N.; Ahmer, B.M.M. Use of attenuated but metabolically competent Salmonella as a probiotic to prevent or treat Salmonella infection. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 2131–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gruzdev, N.; McClelland, M.; Porwollik, S.; Ofaim, S.; Pinto, R.; Saldinger-Sela, S. Global transcriptional analysis of dehydrated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7866–7875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Helander, I.M.; Alakomi, H.L.; Latva-Kala, K.; Mattila-Sandholm, T.; Pol, I.; Smid, E.J.; Gorris, L.G.M.; von Wright, A. Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on Gram-negative bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 3590–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miladi, H.; Zmantar, T.; Kouidhi, B.; Chaabouni, Y.; Mahdouani, K.; Bakhrouf, A.; Chaieb, K. Use of carvacrol, thymol, and eugenol for biofilm eradication and resistance modifying susceptibility of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains to nalidixic acid. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 104, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Olasupo, N.A.; Fitzgerald, D.J.; Gasson, M.J.; Narbad, A. Activity of natural antimicrobial compounds against Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 37, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Humayoun, S.B.; Hiott, L.M.; Gupta, S.K.; Barrett, J.B.; Woodley, T.A.; Johnston, J.J.; Jackson, C.R.; Frye, J.G. An assay for determining the susceptibility of Salmonella isolates to commercial and household biocides. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Obaidat, M.M.; Alu’Datt, M.H.; Bani Salman, A.E.; Obaidat, H.M.; Al-Zyoud, A.A.; Al-Saleh, O.K.; Abu al’anaz, B. Inactivation of nondesiccated and desiccated Cronobacter Sakazakii and Salmonella spp. at low and high inocula levels in reconstituted infant milk formula by vanillin. Food Control 2015, 50, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Skroza, D.; Šimat, V.; Smole Možina, S.; Katalinić, V.; Boban, N.; Generalić Mekinić, I. Interactions of resveratrol with other phenolics and activity against food-borne pathogens. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 2312–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Friedman, M.; Henika, P.R.; Mandrell, R.E. Antibacterial activities of phenolic benzaldehydes and benzoic acids against Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 1811–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wikler, M.A.; Cockerill, F.R.; Craig, W.A.; Dudley, M.N.; Eliopoulos, G.M.; Hecht, D.W.; Hindler, J.F.; Low, D.E.; Sheehan, D.J.; Tenover, F.C.; et al. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically: Approved Standard - Seventh Edition (M7-A7). In CLSI Guidelines; Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute: Annapolis Junction, MD, USA, 2006; ISBN 156238600X. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reh, C.T.; Gerber, A. Total solids determination in dairy products by microwave oven technique. Food Chem. 2003, 82, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nair, M.S.; Upadhyaya, I.; Amalaradjou, M.A.R.; Venkitanarayanan, K. Antimicrobial food additives and disinfectants. In Foodborne Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 275–301. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lambert, R.J.W.; Skandamis, P.N.; Coote, P.J.; Nychas, G.J.E. A study of the minimum inhibitory concentration and mode of action of oregano essential oil, thymol and carvacrol. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 91, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Guevara, L.; Antolinos, V.; Palop, A.; Periago, P.M. Impact of moderate heat, carvacrol, and thymol treatments on the viability, injury, and stress response of Listeria monocytogenes. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Waghmare, R.B.; Perumal, A.B.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Recent developments in freeze drying of foods. In Innovative Food Processing Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 82–99. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lang, E.; Guyot, S.; Peltier, C.; Alvarez-Martin, P.; Perrier-Cornet, J.M.; Gervais, P. Cellular injuries in Cronobacter sakazakii CIP 103183T and Salmonella enterica exposed to drying and subsequent heat treatment in milk powder. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. McDonough, F.E.; Hargrove, R.E. Heat resistance of Salmonella in dried milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1968, 51, 1587–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Changes in intracellular potassium ions from desiccation-adapted Salmonella enterica serovars in the presence of antimicrobial food additives. Values are the averages of three replicates.
Figure 1. Changes in intracellular potassium ions from desiccation-adapted Salmonella enterica serovars in the presence of antimicrobial food additives. Values are the averages of three replicates.
Microorganisms 09 00421 g001
Figure 2. Changes in populations of desiccation-adapted Salmonella Tennessee (A) and Livingstone (B) in response to heat treatment and pretreatment with carvacrol and thymol. Values are averages of three replicates ± standard deviation. Asterisks denote significant differences between averages (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001), “ns” = not significantly different.
Figure 2. Changes in populations of desiccation-adapted Salmonella Tennessee (A) and Livingstone (B) in response to heat treatment and pretreatment with carvacrol and thymol. Values are averages of three replicates ± standard deviation. Asterisks denote significant differences between averages (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001), “ns” = not significantly different.
Microorganisms 09 00421 g002
Figure 3. Changes in Salmonella Typhimurium populations (log CFU/g milk solids) in the freeze-dried milk processed without or with carvacrol when applied at different concentrations. Values are the averages of three replicates ± standard deviation. The dashed line indicates that Salmonella populations were below the enumeration method’s detection limit (i.e., 3 log CFU/g).
Figure 3. Changes in Salmonella Typhimurium populations (log CFU/g milk solids) in the freeze-dried milk processed without or with carvacrol when applied at different concentrations. Values are the averages of three replicates ± standard deviation. The dashed line indicates that Salmonella populations were below the enumeration method’s detection limit (i.e., 3 log CFU/g).
Microorganisms 09 00421 g003
Table 1. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antimicrobial food additives against S. enterica.
Table 1. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antimicrobial food additives against S. enterica.
CategoryFood AdditiveMIC
(ppm)
Source
Plant-derived
Biomolecules
Carvacrol200Current study
Thymol100Current study
Trans-cinnamaldehyde3000[20]
Eugenol512[21]
Vanillin8000[24]
Weak organic
acids
Citric acid12,624[23]
Lactic acid7552[23]
Benzoic acid>6700 a[26]
Microbially-derivedDiacetyl1076[22]
Catechin hydrate181[25]
a Benzoic acid at more than 6700 ppm was required to cause 50% decrease in S. enterica population after exposure for 60 min [26]. Thus, concentrations below and above this level were tested for potassium leakage in the current study.
Table 2. Inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium ASD200 during spray-drying of milk with or without carvacrol.
Table 2. Inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium ASD200 during spray-drying of milk with or without carvacrol.
Treatment TimeMoisture Content (%)Salmonella Population (Log CFU/g Milk Solids)Log CFU/g Reduction *
Control (0 ppm carvacrol)
Time 0 **85.865.6 ± 0.0.050.0 ± 0.00
After drying4.675.3 ± 0.210.3 ± 0.26
1-day storage0.255.0 ± 0.070.6 ± 0.02a #
Carvacrol (200 ppm)
Time 085.866.1 ± 0.510.0 ± 0.00
After drying4.675.9 ± 0.170.2 ± 0.34
1-day storage0.255.2 ± 0.530.9 ± 0.02b
Carvacrol (500 ppm)
Time 085.866.6 ± 0.020.0 ± 0.00
After drying4.676.1 ± 0.020.5 ± 0.00
1-day storage0.255.3 ± 0.131.3 ± 0.10c
* The reduction in Salmonella ASD200 populations was calculated in reference to the initial population before spray-drying. ** Refers to the initial population of Salmonella ASD200 before starting the spray-drying process. Salmonella ASD200 population reductions, highlighted in bold, indicate the highest lethal effects of carvacrol treatments # Data followed by different letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Changes of Salmonella Typhimurium populations in carvacrol-treated milk followed with or without freeze-drying.
Table 3. Changes of Salmonella Typhimurium populations in carvacrol-treated milk followed with or without freeze-drying.
TreatmentLog CFU/g Total Solids of Milk
Initial PopulationDay–01-Day Storage2-Day Storage
Carvacrol (5000 ppm) + Freeze-drying7.5 ± 0.5<3 a<3 a<3 a
Carvacrol (5000 ppm)7.5 ± 0.35.4 ± 0.023.9 ± 0.64.9 ± 0.4
a Below the enumeration method’s detection limit (i.e., 3 log CFU/g).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdelhamid, A.G.; Yousef, A.E. Natural Antimicrobials Suitable for Combating Desiccation-Resistant Salmonella enterica in Milk Powder. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020421

AMA Style

Abdelhamid AG, Yousef AE. Natural Antimicrobials Suitable for Combating Desiccation-Resistant Salmonella enterica in Milk Powder. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(2):421. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020421

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdelhamid, Ahmed G., and Ahmed E. Yousef. 2021. "Natural Antimicrobials Suitable for Combating Desiccation-Resistant Salmonella enterica in Milk Powder" Microorganisms 9, no. 2: 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9020421

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop