Next Article in Journal
Future Risk of Bovine Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) Breakdown in Cattle Herds 2013–2018: A Dominance Analysis Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Colletotrichum spp. from Soybean Cause Disease on Lupin and Can Induce Plant Growth-Promoting Effects
Previous Article in Journal
Administration of Bovine Milk Oligosaccharide to Weaning Gnotobiotic Mice Inoculated with a Simplified Infant Type Microbiota
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria Can Impact Zinc Uptake in Zea mays: An Examination of the Mechanisms of Action Using Functional Mutants of Azospirillum brasilense

by
Alexandra Bauer Housh
1,2,3,
Mary Benoit
4,
Stacy L. Wilder
1,
Stephanie Scott
1,5,
Garren Powell
1,5,
Michael J. Schueller
1,2 and
Richard A. Ferrieri
1,2,3,4,*
1
Missouri Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
2
Chemistry Department, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 652101, USA
3
Interdisciplinary Plant Group, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
4
Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
5
Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(5), 1002; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051002
Submission received: 14 April 2021 / Revised: 27 April 2021 / Accepted: 4 May 2021 / Published: 6 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic, Metabolic and Microbial Activity in Plants)

Abstract

:
Among the PGPB, the genus Azospirillum—with an emphasis on A. brasilense—is likely the most studied microorganism for mitigation of plant stress. Here, we report the investigation of functional mutants HM053, ipdC and FP10 of A. brasilense to understand how the biological functions of these microorganisms can affect host Zn uptake. HM053 is a Nif + constitutively expressed strain that hyper-fixes N2 and produces high levels of the plant’s relevant hormone auxin. FP10 is a Nif- strain deficient in N2-fixation. ipdC is a strain that is deficient in auxin production but fixes N2. Zn uptake was measured in laboratory-based studies of 3-week-old plants using radioactive 65Zn2+ (t½ 244 days). Principal Component Analysis was applied to draw out correlations between microbial functions and host 65Zn2+ accumulation. Additionally, statistical correlations were made to our prior data on plant uptake of radioactive 59Fe3+ and 59Fe2+. These correlations showed that low microbial auxin-producing capacity resulted in the greatest accumulation of 65Zn. Just the opposite effect was noted for 59Fe where high microbial auxin-producing capacity resulted in the greatest accumulation of that tracer.

1. Introduction

Zinc has been implicated with a broad spectrum of growth characteristics in higher plants. In apple, visible symptoms of Zn deficiency occur in dicotyledons where a significant decrease in leaf size is seen [1]. This trait, coined “little leaf” syndrome, is observed as a common growth characteristic in many fruit tree species subjected to Zn deficiency [2]. Zinc also plays important roles in many biochemical functions within plants. It is an essential component for over 300 enzymes [3]. It also plays a role in DNA and RNA metabolism, cell division, and protein synthesis [4]. A lack of sufficient Zn during plant growth can decrease yield and crop quality because of the disruption in these normal metabolic functions [5,6,7].
Today, approximately 30% of global crop production is lost due to essential nutrient deficiencies caused by climatic extremes that result in excessive soil weathering [8] and lack of diverse agricultural practices that deplete nutrient levels in soil. Additionally, foods produced from Zn-deficient crops can result in human Zn deficiency, which can impact human well-being by reducing immune function and increasing the risk of growth stunting in children or adverse pregnancy outcomes in women [5,9].
Plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), which can help their host weather difficult conditions and potentially increase nutritional value of crops, are finding increased use in agriculture. These organisms can activate physiological and biochemical responses within their host for mutual benefit to build natural tolerances to environmental stresses and thereby reduce losses in the field [10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Several have been identified as endophytes of grass species, including Azoarcus spp. in Kallar grass (Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth) and rice (Oryza sativa) [17,18,19], Herbaspirillum seropedicae in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) [20] and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) [19], and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus in sugarcane [21]. Others have been identified as epiphytes, including Azospirillum brasilense and lipoferum, which have been commercialized as crop inoculants for maize and wheat [22,23,24,25]. These strains are gaining increasing acceptance in agriculture as PGPB inoculants. Unlike rhizobia that form an intracellular symbiosis with their legume hosts, PGPB do not induce the formation of observable plant structures (nodules). They are also not usually major components of the soil microflora [20,26]. These N2-fixing bacteria infect at the emergence of lateral roots and in the zone of elongation and differentiation above the root tip [14]. Typically, very high numbers of PGPB in roots have been reported (i.e., ≤108 gram−1 root dry weight) with no observable disease symptoms [17].
The present work reports on the use of radioactive 65Zn (t½ 244 days) to examine root assimilation and whole-plant transport of the metal under different conditions of growth. A review of the literature reveals a limited number of papers that have used Zn radioisotopes to examine plant uptake of the metal [26,27,28,29]. Measuring Zn uptake through its radioactive decay can be highly quantitative. However, its general utility in plant biology is limited by the fact that many laboratories are not equipped with the appropriate nuclear instrumentation needed to make such measurements. Here, plants were inoculated with three different functional mutant strains of Azospirillum brasilense PGPB, including HM053, a Nif + constitutively expressed mutant of the nif gene coding for nitrogen fixation enzymes that fixes excess N2 and excretes large amounts of ammonium into the rhizosphere; ipdC, a mutant strain disrupted in the ipdC gene thus impaired in biosynthesizing the plant’s relevant hormone auxin, indole-3-acetic acid [16]; and FP10, a Nif mutant that is deficient in fixing N2, and also compared plant performance for assimilating 65Zn relative to non-inoculated controls. These studies were conducted to determine whether these microbial functions had any influence on their host’s performance. Furthermore, the longer-term effects of microbial functions on host seed filling were examined in outdoor potted plant studies to determine whether harvested kernels had a higher Zn content.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacteria Growth

Functional mutants were grown in liquid NFbHP-lactate medium following published procedures [13]. The concentration of zinc in the growth media was 0.8 μM ZnSO4 ⋅7 H2O. Cultures were washed with sterile water and diluted to 1 mL containing between 106 to 108 colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU mL−1). Bacteria content was measured by sample turbidity, where OD600 = 1.0 (optical density at 600 nm, corresponding to 108 cells mL−1). Root inoculation involved adding the inoculum to a Petri dish of 10–20 maize seedlings and rocking in a shaking incubator for two hours at 30 °C. Seedlings were then placed into germination pouches for five days before transplanting to hydroponics. Liquid inoculants of each bacterial mutant were made by taking the liquid bacteria cultures described above and centrifuging the cultures down to a pellet. The supernatant above the pellet was removed, and sterile water washes of the pellet were completed for 3 rinses. Upon rinsing the nutrient from the pellet, it was diluted to 1 mL total volume in sterile water and then administered to the plants, both indoors and out.

2.2. Laboratory Plant Growth:

Maize kernels from Elk Mound Seed Co. (Hybrid 8100, Elk Mound, WI, USA) were dark-germinated at room temperature for two days on sterilized paper towels wetted with sterile water in a Petri dish. Seeds were inoculated with bacteria culture as appropriate and transplanted to plastic seed germination pouches (PhytoAB, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) wetted with sterile Hoagland’s basal salt solution for approximately one week. They were then transferred to individual 600 mL hydroponics cells that were continuously aerated and filled with Hoagland’s nutrient (pH 6.0). The nutrient was exchanged on a five-day cycle. Growth conditions consisted of 12-hour photoperiods, 500 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity, and temperatures of 25 °C/20 °C (light/dark) with humidity at 70–80%.

2.3. Outdoor Plant Growth

For outdoor, non-radioactive studies, 3 maize kernels from Elk Mound Seed Co. (Hybrid 8100) were sown into each of 2.7-gallon pots filled with ProMix. Plants were placed on elevated tables outside and pots were rotated every week to ensure uniformity of growth conditions. After germination, any excess seedlings were removed from each pot leaving a single plant. A capful of fertilizer (~1.2 g) containing nitrogen, phosphate, and potash (14-14-14, Osmocote™ Smart-Release Plant Food Flower & Vegetable™, The Scotts Company, Marysville, OH, USA) was added to the assigned pots at the time of planting. Fertilizer was reapplied to pots 30 and 60 days after germination (DAG). Study regimes included the following: (i) non-inoculated control plants; (ii) plants inoculated with A. brasilense HM053 bacterium; (iii) plants inoculated with A. brasilense ipdC bacterium; and (iv) plants inoculated with A. brasilense FP10 bacterium. Plants were administered liquid inoculants at 21, 42, and 63 DAG using re-washed bacteria cultures containing between 106 to 108 colony-forming units per milliliter, as described above. These cultures were further diluted to 10 mL volumes in sterile water and administered to the pots. Treatments were randomized across the planting platforms. At the end of the growing season, cobs were harvested, and seeds analyzed by ion chromatography for Zn content.

2.4. 65Zinc Studies

65Zn was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences (Billerica, MA USA). One hour before administration of radiotracer, plants were removed from their hydroponics cells and suspended in 600 mL beakers consisting of 100 mL of deionized water (Figure 1). Plants were maintained at the same daytime light and temperature conditions as that used to maintain their growth. An aqueous solution of 65Zn radiotracer at 0.74 MBq was injected into the beaker of water in which the roots were immersed. Based on the radiotracer’s specific activity, we estimated that 45 μg of non-radioactive Zn was introduced to the 100 mL of deionized water during a tracer study (equivalent to 0.7 μM), which closely matched the 0.8 μM Zn levels introduced via the Hoagland’s nutrient solution during plant growth. Hence, the mass of Zn introduced in the tracer studies did not perturb the plant’s normal exposure to this micronutrient. A radiation detector (Eckler & Ziegler, Inc., Berlin, Germany 1-inch Na-PMT, photomultiplier tube gamma radiation detector) affixed to the plant 8 cm above the base of the stem provided dynamic feedback on 65Zn transport from roots to shoots. Data were acquired at a 1 Hz sampling rate using 0-1 V analog input into an acquisition box (SRI, Inc, Torrance, CA, USA). After 3 h of acquisition, roots were cut from the shoots, thoroughly washed in water, blotted dry, and weighed. Shoots were also weighed. Both root and shoot tissues were then sequentially placed in a 3 inch NaI-PMT gamma well-type detector for quantifying the amount of 65Zn radioactivity. 65Zn uptake and allocation percentages were calculated as the amount of radiotracer counted in the plant roots and shoots divided by total radioactivity administered as a percentage and the amount of radioactivity measured solely in the shoots divided by the total radioactivity in the roots and shoots as a percentage, respectively.

2.5. Plant Radiography

After 65Zn administration, plants were harvested and roots were blotted dry and laid out on an absorbent pad for imaging. Shoots were also laid out on a separate absorbent pad for imaging. Radiographic images of different tissue areas (roots and shoots) were acquired by exposing phosphor plate films. Phosphor plates of roots were exposed for 36 h while plates of shoots were exposed for 120 h to acquire a sufficient signal. After exposure, phosphor plates were then read using the Typhoon 9000 imager (TyphoonTM FLA 9000, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Images were only used qualitatively for determining spatial patterning of 65Zn tracer in roots and shoots; hence no attempt was made to normalize image data. Comparative whole-plant radiographic images of 59Fe3+ and 59Fe2+ were also acquired from our prior work [16], but because of the faster decay rate of this radionuclide (t½ 44.5 day), we only needed to expose these tissues for 16 h.

2.6. Ion Chromatography Analysis of Corn Kernel Zn Content

Zinc content was quantified from corn kernels using ion chromatography coupled with UV absorption detection following the collection and drying of the kernels in an oven for 3 weeks at 65 °C. Seeds were pulverized between plastic sheets using a wooden mallet and dissolved in 1 mL of 1M HCl. Samples were subjected to ultrasonication for 5 minutes at 100% amplitude (Branson Bransonic 32; Sigma-Aldrich Corp. St. Louis, MO, USA) then centrifuged for 15 minutes at 3000 rpm. The supernatant was removed for sampling and stored in brown glass vialsin a refrigerator (2–8 °C). Zn standards were prepared in 0.1 M HCl using zinc chloride (ZnCl2, 1 mg mL−1).
The analytical system consisted of a Thermo Scientific Dionex AXP Metal-Free HPLC with a Rheodyne metal-free injector and PEEK tubing 1/20 cm inner diameter. The ion chromatography column was a Thermo Fisher Scientific™ Dionex™ (Waltham, MA, USA) IonPac CS5A 4 i.d. × 250 mm analytical column outfitted with a CG5A 4 i.d. × 40 mm guard column designed to separate a broad range of metal complexes by cation and anion chromatography. The mobile phase consisted of 7 mM pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid, 66 mM potassium sulfate, and 74 mM formic acid pH 4.2 run at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min−1. A post column reagent comprising 0.5 mM 4-(2-pyridylazo) resorcinol (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in MetPac PAR post column diluent (1.0 M 2-dimethylaminoethanol/0.50 M ammonium hydroxide/0.30 M sodium bicarbonate pH 10.4) at a flow rate of approximately 0.6 mL min−1 was used for detection by a Knauer Smartline 2500 UV detector operated at 530 nm. Sterile water (HyPure™ WFI Quality Water, HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA) was used in solvent preparation. All biological samples were analyzed in triplicate.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were subjected to the Shapiro–Wilk Normality Test to identify outliers, so all data groups reflected normal distributions. Data were analyzed using the Student’s t-test for pair-wise comparisons made between non-inoculated controls and bacteria treatment. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

2.8. Principal Component Analysis of 65Zn and 59Fe Data

The 65Zn uptake and allocation data from the present study and 59Fe data from our prior work [16] were analyzed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using XLSTAT software version 2020.3 (Addinsoft Inc., New York, NY 10001, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Results in Figure 2 of the different rates for 65Zn transport as a function of A. brasilense inoculation showed that ipdC > HM053 > FP10. FP10 was most like non-inoculated control plants. Tissue distribution of Zn using ‘cut and count’ techniques revealed a similar dissimilarity between ipdC bacteria and the other inoculants (Figure 3). Systematic trends defining uptake and in planta translocation of 65Zn become apparent in the PCA biplot (Figure 4A). The information included in the biplot was represented by two principal components (PC), with PC1 representing 71.89% of the information embedded in the data and PC2 representing 28.11%. The PCs selected to represent the data are classified as feature vectors (F1 and F2), as shown on the biplot. The axes are in terms of the eigenvalues, with larger values indicating a greater variance and thus a greater representation of the information within the data. The active variables, shown as dotted lines, represent the initial variables of root assimilation of 65Zn and shoot allocation. The length of the active variable vectors indicates how well the variables are tied to the feature vectors. Since the active variable vectors are equivalent in length in Figure 4A and are found equally between F1 and F2, it can be interpreted that both active variables are equally represented by both F1 and F2. As displayed, each of the microbial treatments clustered together, indicating behavior within a treatment type that was distinct from other treatments. It was shown that FP10 and non-inoculated maize were similar in overall 65Zn uptake and shoot allocation behavior. HM053 inoculated maize exhibited a slight elevation in allocation patterns relative to control and FP10. ipdC was most unique in its uptake and allocation patterns than other treatments in the X- and Y-axis directions.
What distinguishes ipdC from the other microbial inoculants examined in this study is its deficiency in producing auxin (indole-3-acetic acid), an important plant hormone. Our past studies showed that the HM053 mutant exhibited the highest level of auxin biosynthesis, being 2 times that of FP10 and 13 times that of ipdC [16]. We know that auxin biosynthesis in plants and Zn levels are strongly correlated [30,31,32]. With tryptophan being the principal intermediate in auxin biosynthesis, withholding Zn was shown to lower plant tryptophan levels [30] and auxin levels [31], while exogenous treatment with Zn increased tryptophan levels [32]. We suspect that the mechanism for promoting plant 65Zn uptake in the present study has to do with the auxin-producing capacity of the microorganism. We note that while ipdC lacks the ability to biosynthesize auxin, it still processes the molecular machinery to produce indole—a key precursor to tryptophan biosynthesis [16]. In fact, maize root indole emissions with ipdC inoculation were nearly 2 times that of HM053 inoculated plants, and 1.5 times that of FP10 inoculated plants [16]. We suspect this behavior may be due to bacteria-root indole trafficking, which could elevate the endogenous pool of plant tryptophan, causing an elevation in Zn uptake. To the best of our knowledge, no one has examined whether tryptophan treatments will elevate endogenous levels of plant Zn.
Similar statistical treatments were applied to our previously published 59Fe data [16], both for ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) forms of the tracer to yield Figure 4B,C, respectively. As displayed here, each of the microbial treatments again clustered together, indicating the behavior within a treatment type that was distinct from the other microbial treatments. Unlike our 65Zn2+ data shown in Figure 4A, we observed different microbial influences on host iron assimilation, with HM053 exhibiting the greatest influence for root uptake and shoot allocation of both 59Fe3+ and 59Fe2+ over the other bacteria strains. In our earlier work, we ascertained through whole-plant radiographic imaging that the oxidation state of the iron radiotracer was unaltered by the microorganism’s functions. Here, we noted that each oxidation state of the radiometal exhibited a different spatial patterning across the shoot tissues with 59Fe3+ accumulating in leaf tips, while 59Fe2+ accumulating uniformly throughout the leaves. Figure 5 shows an example of this distribution from HM053 inoculated maize plants since HM053 caused the largest increase in 59Fe3+ and 59Fe2+ allocations to shoots relative to the other microbial inoculants. For comparison, we also show radiographic images in the same figure from maize 65Zn2+ studies as a function of ipdC, FP10, and HM053 microbial inoculants. In all cases here, 65Zn spatial patterning in leaves was similar to that of 59Fe2+. However, root tissues exhibited significantly different radiotracer distributions, where elongation zones showed higher levels of 65Zn than both oxidation states of the 59Fe radiotracer. Additionally, we noted a common trend where a high accumulation of 65Zn was observed in the lower stem region, likely in the coleoptile. Past studies have shown that the coleoptile in maize seedlings exhibits a strong growth dependency on auxin [33]. Taken together, our results show that maize assimilation of divalent metals such as Zn2+ or Fe2+ has significant dependency on microbial auxin biosynthesis. Once assimilated, these metals also exhibit very different spatial patterning during transport aboveground.
Finally, we examined the longer-term influence of these mutant strains of A. brasilense on kernel zinc content. Results in Figure 6 showed that HM053 did not alter seed zinc levels relative to non-inoculated controls. However, both ipdC and FP10 bacteria showed significantly less zinc content. Hence, while ipdC promotes zinc accumulation in host vegetative tissues, that action does not translate to the seed filling process. We suspect that heavy 65Zn accumulation in the lower stem may minimize the metal’s availability during seed filling.

4. Conclusions

The present work showed evidence that certain biological traits of root-associating microorganisms can have beneficial effects on the host plant in promoting Zn uptake. These mechanisms of action appeared to correlate with the auxin producing capacity of the microorganism in that the auxin deficient mutant ipdC had the greatest influence in promoting host 65Zn uptake. Mechanisms of action appear not to be universally translated across all metals, since 65Zn and 59Fe exhibited very different dependencies on microbial functions.
While the microbial actions promoting host Zn uptake could benefit over the long term in improved crop yield, our results suggest that there is little or no effect on kernel Zn content improving its nutritional value.

Author Contributions

Experimental design and supervision, R.A.F. and A.B.H.; data collection and analysis, S.L.W., A.B.H., M.B., S.S., G.P., and M.J.S.; initial draft, R.A.F. and S.L.W.; final draft, All authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Award No. 2017-67013-26216 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture and through a startup award from the University of Missouri administered through University of Missouri Research Reactor Center.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon requests made to the corresponding author and pending institutional permissions.

Acknowledgments

We would also like to thank Emanuel de Souza (U. Paraná, Brazil) whose institution provided the HM053 functional mutant of A. brasilense in this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Martin, M.H.; Marschner, H. The mineral nutrition of higher plants. J. Ecol. 1988, 76, 1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Swietlik, D. Zinc nutrition of fruit crops. HortTechnology 2002, 12, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Fox, T.C.; Guerinot, M.L. Molecular biology of cation transport in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1998, 49, 669–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dickinson, K.; O’Brieo, J.; Voet, L.; Edwards, T. Metalosate “zinc in plant nutrition”. Albion 2003, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alloway, B.J. Soil factors associated with zinc deficiency in crops and humans. Environ. Geochem. Health 2009, 31, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cakmak, I. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil 2008, 302, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cavagnaro, T.R. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in improving plant zinc nutrition under low soil zinc concentra-tions: A review. Plant Soil 2008, 304, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qafoku, N.P. Chapter Two—Climate change effects on soils: Accelerated weathering, soil carbon, and elemental cycling. Adv. Agron. 2015, 131, 111–172. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hess, S.Y. National risk of zinc deficiency as estimated by national surveys. Food Nutr. Bull. 2017, 38, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Goswami, D.; Thakker, J.N.; Dhandhukia, P.C. Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. Null 2016, 2, 1127500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, J.; Kloepper, J.W.; Ryu, C.-M. Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarma, B.K.; Yadav, S.K.; Singh, D.P.; Singh, H.B. Rhizobacteria mediated induced systemic tolerance in plants: Prospects for abiotic stress management. In Bacteria in Agrobiology: Stress Management; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 225–238. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pérez-Montaño, F.; Alías-Villegas, C.; Bellogín, R.A.; del Cerro, P.; Espuny, M.R.; Jiménez-Guerrero, I.; López-Baena, F.J.; Ollero, F.J.; Cubo, T. Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: From microorganism capacities to crop production. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Pankievicz, V.C.S.; do Amaral, F.P.; Santos, K.F.D.N.; Agtuca, B.; Xu, Y.; Schueller, M.J.; Arisi, A.C.M.; Steffens, M.B.R.; de Souza, E.M.; Pedrosa, F.O.; et al. Robust biological nitrogen fixation in a model grass-bacterial association. Plant J. 2015, 81, 907–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Backer, R.; Rokem, J.S.; Ilangumaran, G.; Lamont, J.; Praslickova, D.; Ricci, E.; Subramanian, S.; Smith, D.L. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Housh, A.B.; Powell, G.; Scott, S.; Anstaett, A.; Gerheart, A.; Benoit, M.; Waller, S.; Powell, A.; Guthrie, J.M.; Higgins, B.; et al. Functional mutants of Azospirillum brasilense elicit beneficial physiological and metabolic responses in Zea mays contributing to increased host iron assimilation. ISME J. 2021, 15, 1505–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Reinhold, B.; Hurek, T.; Niemann, E.-G.; Fendrik, I. Close association of Azospirillum and diazotrophic rods with different root zones of Kallar grass. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986, 52, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hurek, T.; Reinhold-Hurek, B.; Turner, G.L.; Bergersen, F.J. Augmented rates of respiration and efficient nitrogen fixation at nanomolar concentrations of dissolved O2 in hyperinduced Azoarcus sp. strain BH72. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 4726–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. James, E.K.; Olivares, F.L.; Baldani, J.I.; Döbereiner, J. Herbaspirillum, an endophytic diazotroph colonizing vascular tissue in leaves of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench. J. Exp. Bot. 1997, 48, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. James, E.K.; Olivares, F.L. Infection and colonization of sugar cane and other Graminaceous plants by endophytic diazotrophs. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1998, 17, 77–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. James, E.K.; Reis, V.M.; Olivares, F.L.; Baldani, J.I.; Dobereiner, J. Infection of sugar cane by the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Acetobacter diazotrophicus. J. Exp. Bot. 1994, 45, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Okon, Y.; Labandera-Gonzalez, C.A. Agronomic applications of Azospirillum: An evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1994, 26, 1591–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dobbelaere, S.; Croonenborghs, A.; Thys, A.; Ptacek, D.; Vanderleyden, J.; Dutto, P.; Labandera-Gonzalez, C.; Caballero-Mellado, J.; Aguirre, J.F.; Kapulnik, Y.; et al. Responses of agro-nomically important crops to inoculation with Azospirillum. Funct. Plant Biol. 2001, 28, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hungria, M.; Campo, R.J.; Souza, E.M.; Pedrosa, F.O. Inoculation with selected strains of Azospirillum brasilense and A. lipoferum improves yields of maize and wheat in Brazil. Plant Soil 2010, 331, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zeffa, D.M.; Perini, L., Jr.; Silva, M.B.; de Sousa, N.V.; Scapim, C.A.; Martinez de Oliveira, A.L.; Teixeira do Amaral, A., Jr.; Goncalves, L.S.A. Azospirillum brasilense promotes increases in growth and nitrogen use efficiency of maize genotypes. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Reinhold-Hurek, B.; Hurek, T. Life in grasses: Diazotrophic endophytes. Trends Microbiol. 1998, 6, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Erenoglu, B.; Nikolic, M.; Römheld, V.; Cakmak, I. Uptake and transport of foliar applied zinc (65Zn) in bread and durum wheat cultivars differing in zinc efficiency. Plant Soil 2002, 241, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Suzui, N.; Yin, Y.-G.; Ishii, S.; Sekimoto, H.; Kawachi, N. Visualization of zinc dynamics in intact plants using positron imaging of commercially available 65Zn. Plant Methods 2017, 13, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Youngdahl, L.J.; Svec, L.V.; Liebhardt, W.C.; Teel, M.R. Changes in the zinc-65 distribution in corn root tissue with a phosphorus variable. Crop. Sci. 1977, 17, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hanafy, A.A.H.; Khalil, M.K.; Abd El-Rahman, A.M.; Nadia, A.M.H. Effect of zinc, tryptophan and indole acetic acid on growth, yield and chemical composition of valencia orange trees. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2012, 8, 901–914. [Google Scholar]
  31. Price, C.A. Molecular Approaches to Plant Physiology; McGraw Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1970; p. 398. [Google Scholar]
  32. Singh, M. Effect of zinc, phosphorus and nitrogen on tryptophan concentration in rice grains grown on limited and unlimited soil. Plant Soil 1981, 62, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Haga, K.; Iino, M. Auxin-growth relationships in maize coleoptiles and pea internodes and control by auxin of the tissue sensitivity to auxin. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 1473–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Experimental setup used for plant 65Zn uptake studies. During exposure to radiotracer, plants were maintained at a constant 500 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity and 21 °C temperature.
Figure 1. Experimental setup used for plant 65Zn uptake studies. During exposure to radiotracer, plants were maintained at a constant 500 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity and 21 °C temperature.
Microorganisms 09 01002 g001
Figure 2. Dynamic 65Zn transport over ~3-hours of acquisition. The data reflect 65Zn transport measured by a radiation detector located along the plant stem at approximately 8 cm from the base of the stem. Each data point represents a 5-minute average ± SD of 300 data points sampled at 1 Hz across 5-6 biological replicates. (Panel A): Transport of 65Zn in HM053-inoculated plants is shown in red with the non-inoculated control data shown in black. (Panel B): Transport of 65Zn in ipdC inoculated plants is shown in yellow, with the non-inoculated control data shown in black. (Panel C): Transport of 65Zn in FP10 inoculated plants is shown in green, with the non-inoculated control data shown in black. In all cases, data were normalized to the same starting level of radioactivity for direct comparison of transport across the bacteria strains. Data were fitted to trendlines (depicted by the dashed lines).
Figure 2. Dynamic 65Zn transport over ~3-hours of acquisition. The data reflect 65Zn transport measured by a radiation detector located along the plant stem at approximately 8 cm from the base of the stem. Each data point represents a 5-minute average ± SD of 300 data points sampled at 1 Hz across 5-6 biological replicates. (Panel A): Transport of 65Zn in HM053-inoculated plants is shown in red with the non-inoculated control data shown in black. (Panel B): Transport of 65Zn in ipdC inoculated plants is shown in yellow, with the non-inoculated control data shown in black. (Panel C): Transport of 65Zn in FP10 inoculated plants is shown in green, with the non-inoculated control data shown in black. In all cases, data were normalized to the same starting level of radioactivity for direct comparison of transport across the bacteria strains. Data were fitted to trendlines (depicted by the dashed lines).
Microorganisms 09 01002 g002
Figure 3. (Panel A): ‘Cut and count’ measurements yielded information on plant uptake of 65Zn presented as the percentage of tracer dose administered to the beaker that was assimilated by the plant over 3 h. (Panel B): Root-to-shoot allocation of 65Zn is presented as the percentage of the administered dose of radiotracer. Data reflect means for N = 5-6 replicates (±SE). Statistical significance p < 0.05 was designated by ‘a’ in a comparison of treatment to control, ‘b’ in a comparison of ipdC or FP10 to HM053, and ‘c’ in a comparison of FP10 to ipdC treatment.
Figure 3. (Panel A): ‘Cut and count’ measurements yielded information on plant uptake of 65Zn presented as the percentage of tracer dose administered to the beaker that was assimilated by the plant over 3 h. (Panel B): Root-to-shoot allocation of 65Zn is presented as the percentage of the administered dose of radiotracer. Data reflect means for N = 5-6 replicates (±SE). Statistical significance p < 0.05 was designated by ‘a’ in a comparison of treatment to control, ‘b’ in a comparison of ipdC or FP10 to HM053, and ‘c’ in a comparison of FP10 to ipdC treatment.
Microorganisms 09 01002 g003
Figure 4. Principal Component Analysis correlates 65Zn uptake and root–shoot allocation (Panel A) to the biological functions of the beneficial microbes. HM053 and FP10 mutant strains were most like non-inoculated plant behavior, while ipdC was dissimilar, exhibiting the highest levels of root uptake and transport. Statistical correlations were made to 59Fe2+ (Panel B) and 59Fe3+ data that we acquired in prior work [16].
Figure 4. Principal Component Analysis correlates 65Zn uptake and root–shoot allocation (Panel A) to the biological functions of the beneficial microbes. HM053 and FP10 mutant strains were most like non-inoculated plant behavior, while ipdC was dissimilar, exhibiting the highest levels of root uptake and transport. Statistical correlations were made to 59Fe2+ (Panel B) and 59Fe3+ data that we acquired in prior work [16].
Microorganisms 09 01002 g004
Figure 5. Radiographic images of maize plants after exposure to 65Zn as a function of inoculation with ipdC, FP10, and HM053 bacteria. For comparison, we also show radiographic images of maize plants after exposure to 59Fe3+ and 59Fe2+ radiotracers from our prior work [16]. These plants were also inoculated with HM053, which was shown to exert the greatest influence on host 59Fe3+ and 59Fe2+ uptake and allocation.
Figure 5. Radiographic images of maize plants after exposure to 65Zn as a function of inoculation with ipdC, FP10, and HM053 bacteria. For comparison, we also show radiographic images of maize plants after exposure to 59Fe3+ and 59Fe2+ radiotracers from our prior work [16]. These plants were also inoculated with HM053, which was shown to exert the greatest influence on host 59Fe3+ and 59Fe2+ uptake and allocation.
Microorganisms 09 01002 g005
Figure 6. Kernel Zn content was measured using ion chromatography. Data reflect means for N = 12 replicates (±SE). Statistical significance p < 0.05 was designated by ‘a’ in the comparison of treatment type to untreated control, and ‘b’ in a comparison of ipdC or FP10 treatments to HM053 treatment.
Figure 6. Kernel Zn content was measured using ion chromatography. Data reflect means for N = 12 replicates (±SE). Statistical significance p < 0.05 was designated by ‘a’ in the comparison of treatment type to untreated control, and ‘b’ in a comparison of ipdC or FP10 treatments to HM053 treatment.
Microorganisms 09 01002 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Housh, A.B.; Benoit, M.; Wilder, S.L.; Scott, S.; Powell, G.; Schueller, M.J.; Ferrieri, R.A. Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria Can Impact Zinc Uptake in Zea mays: An Examination of the Mechanisms of Action Using Functional Mutants of Azospirillum brasilense. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051002

AMA Style

Housh AB, Benoit M, Wilder SL, Scott S, Powell G, Schueller MJ, Ferrieri RA. Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria Can Impact Zinc Uptake in Zea mays: An Examination of the Mechanisms of Action Using Functional Mutants of Azospirillum brasilense. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(5):1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Housh, Alexandra Bauer, Mary Benoit, Stacy L. Wilder, Stephanie Scott, Garren Powell, Michael J. Schueller, and Richard A. Ferrieri. 2021. "Plant-Growth-Promoting Bacteria Can Impact Zinc Uptake in Zea mays: An Examination of the Mechanisms of Action Using Functional Mutants of Azospirillum brasilense" Microorganisms 9, no. 5: 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051002

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop