Next Article in Journal
Study of the Vaginal Microbiota in Healthy Women of Reproductive Age
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Microbial Community Analysis as an Analysis Tool for Optimal Biogas Production
Previous Article in Journal
Light-Triggered Carotenogenesis in Myxococcus xanthus: New Paradigms in Photosensory Signaling, Transduction and Gene Regulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Yarrowia lipolytica Strain Engineered for Pyomelanin Production
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/microorganisms9051068
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Challenges and Potential in Increasing Lutein Content in Microalgae

by
Yuxiao Xie
,
Xiaochao Xiong
and
Shulin Chen
*
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6120, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(5), 1068; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051068
Submission received: 23 April 2021 / Revised: 9 May 2021 / Accepted: 10 May 2021 / Published: 15 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbes for Production of Biofuels and Bio-Products)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Research on enhancing lutein content in microalgae has made significant progress in recent years. However, strategies are needed to address the possible limitations of microalgae as practical lutein producers. The capacity of lutein sequestration may determine the upper limit of cellular lutein content. The preliminary estimation presented in this work suggests that the lutein sequestration capacity of the light-harvesting complex (LHC) of microalgae is most likely below 2% on the basis of dry cell weight (DCW). Due to its nature as a structural pigment, higher lutein content might interfere with the LHC in fulfilling photosynthetic functions. Storing lutein in a lipophilic environment is a mechanism for achieving high lutein content but several critical barriers must be overcome such as lutein degradation and access to lipid droplet to be stored through esterification. Understanding the mechanisms underlying lipid droplet biogenesis in chloroplasts, as well as carotenoid trafficking through chloroplast membranes and carotenoid esterification, may provide insight for new approaches to achieve high lutein contents in algae. In the meantime, building the machinery for esterification and sequestration of lutein and other hydroxyl-carotenoids in model microorganisms, such as yeast, with synthetic biology technology provides a promising option.

1. Introduction

Lutein ((3R, 3′R, 6′R)-β, ε-carotene-3, 3′-diol) is a C40 hydroxyl-carotenoid with a chemical structure that has an unsaturated polyene chain as the skeleton, one ε-ring and one β-ring on each side of the skeleton, with a hydroxyl-group on the 3′ site of each ring. Lutein is primarily synthesized by plants and algae with two forms. In the first configuration, lutein is present as a “structural form”, and its function is primarily involved in light-harvesting and nonphotochemical quenching [1,2]. In the second form, with one or two fatty acids bound to the hydroxyl-groups, lutein is converted into “oil form” that is accumulated in lipid vessels of many flowers and fruits [3].
Lutein has demonstrated use as an antioxidant, a food coloring agent and a nutraceutical, and is thus widely used in cosmetics, food additives and drugs [4,5]. The conjugated double bonds of lutein provide substantial antioxidant property. Because the human body cannot synthesize lutein and other carotenoids, dietary intake is vital to human health. Lutein and its isomer zeaxanthin provide unique health benefits to the human macular region. These are the only two carotenoids that are greatly enriched in the human retinal macula region to improve visual function, filter blue light and prevent oxidative damage [6]. In fact, a six milligram of daily intake of lutein can significantly lower the risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) [7,8]. Studies also suggest that lutein may reduce the risk of some cancers and prevent heart disease and stroke [9,10,11,12]. These beneficial effects of lutein on human health have prompted increased demand for lutein and resulted in a significant global lutein market.
Algal-based lutein production provides a promising alternative to that extracted from marigold, although currently the commercial supply of lutein mainly depends on farming and extracting marigold petals in China, India and Mexico [4,13,14]. Compared with marigold, microalgae have several unique characteristics. Microalgae grow much faster than marigold, leading to higher lutein annual productivity. They can be cultured in large-scale fermenters, photobioreactors or even open ponds. Therefore, microalgae-based lutein production is an industrially scalable process. It is also less susceptible to seasonal, climatic and land limitations than marigold-based lutein production [4,13,15].
In the past two decades, several microalgae species such as Chlorella spp., Scenedesmus spp., Muriellopsis spp., and Dunaliella spp. have been investigated for lutein production [16,17,18,19]. Considering the high cost of cell harvesting, cell disruption and pigment extraction in microalgae-based lutein production, the studies suggest that lutein content need be greater than 10 mg/g to be commercially feasible [13]. However, algal lutein content averages around 5 mg/g of dry cell weight (DCW). Therefore, microalgae-based lutein production has not been commercialized yet, due to low lutein content in microalgal cells.
Extensive studies have explored new algal species with naturally high lutein content, and have enhanced lutein content with different cultivation methods in the recent years (Table 1). Xie et al. isolated a lutein-rich microalgae species, Chlorella sorokiniana FZU60 [20]. After optimizing sodium acetate and nitrate concentration in the growth medium, maximum lutein content, lutein productivity and biomass productivity reached 9.65 mg/g, 4.86 mg/L/d, and 503.55 mg/L/d, separately. Pilot-scale cultivation of C. sorokiniana FZU60 in a 50 L column photobioreactor was conducted and optimized. Optimum lutein content, lutein yield and lutein productivity were achieved at 9.51 mg/g, 33.55 mg/L, and 4.67 mg/L/d, separately, under a novel, two-stage cultivation mode [21]. Heo et al. optimized and evaluated the lutein production of microalgae Parachlorella sp. JD-076 under different types of photobioreactors. Maximum lutein content of 11.8 mg/g, with a lutein productivity of 25.0 mg/L/d, was achieved by exposing the strain to 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 of light intensity [22].
Efforts have also been made on strain improvements for increasing lutein content. Random mutagenesis has been used as a useful technique to improve strains and isolate lutein-rich algal mutants [25]. Chemical mutagens and UV-irradiance were attempted to generate mutant strains. High lutein yield algal mutants were isolated by resistance to inhibitors of the carotenogenic pathway. In this way, several algal mutants with high lutein content have been isolated (Table 2). For example, Cordero et al. obtained several high lutein-yield C. sorokiniana mutants through random mutagenesis with N-methyl-N’-nitro-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). The highest lutein content, 7.0 mg/g, was achieved by the mutant DMR5 and DMR-8 [26]. A 7.52 mg/g lutein content was achieved with the mutant strain C. sorokiniana MB-1-M12 under mixotrophic conditions [24]. Chromochloris zofingiensis (also named as Chlorella zofingiensis) could accumulate lutein, zeaxanthin, β-carotene and astaxanthin under different cultivation conditions [27]. After mutagenesis by MNNG, Huang et al. isolated a C. zofingiensis mutant with a dysfunctional BKT1 gene. In this mutant, the content of lutein, zeaxanthin and β-carotene reached 13.81 ± 1.23, 7.00 ± 0.82, and 7.18 ± 0.72 mg/g, separately [28].
Metabolic and genetic engineering are also used as effective tools to manipulate the rate-limiting step of the metabolic pathway for increasing lutein content and productivity in algal strains [33]. Although genetic engineering of algae is still in the initial stages, the use of this technique to enhance lutein content in microalgae has made progress in recent years. For example, new molecular technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering technology and genome sequencing have improved understanding of lutein metabolism regulation in algae species [34,35,36,37].
Phytoene synthase (PSY) and phytoene desaturase (PDS) are essential enzymes that catalyze rate-limiting carotenoid biosynthesis steps in plants and algae. Overexpression of these genes may increase lutein content in algal cells. For example, the heterologous PSY gene from D. salina and C. zofingiensis has been overexpressed in C. reinhardtii [29,30]. The PSY transformants exhibited a 1.6-fold and 2.0-fold increase of lutein content in transgenic cells compared with the wild type. The endogenous PDS gene was overexpressed in C. zofingiensis and resulted in a 32.1% increase in the total carotenoid content [31].
Another approach taken is to enhance the enzymatic activity of PSY. The orange (OR) gene encodes a plastid-associated protein, which triggers the chloroplast to chromoplast differentiation in plants. Many studies have focused on the OR protein’s positive effect on the post-transcriptional regulation of carotenoids by stabilizing the PSY protein and maintaining the PSY protein level [38,39,40]. Recently, an OR gene from arabidopsis (AtOR) was expressed in the alga C. reinhardtii, resulting in a 1.9-fold and 1.7-fold increase in lutein β-carotene, respectively [32].
In sum, research on the production of microalgae-based lutein has made remarkable progress. Recent work has approached the commercialization threshold of microalgal-based lutein production. However, as a carotenoid producer, the level of lutein accumulation in microalgae species is still far below the level of β-carotene concentrates in Dunaliella spp. (up to 14% of DCW) and astaxanthin in Haematococcus spp. (up to 5% of DCW) [41,42]. Therefore, further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms of lutein biosynthesis and regulation and to identify potential limiting factors of lutein accumulation in microalgae.

2. Lutein Sequestration Versus Structural Function

Sequestration capacity is critical for lutein accumulation because the structural form of this pigment, with an esstantial role in fulfilling photosynthetic functions, only has a minimal content.
The accumulation of lutein is the ultimate result of three major processes: biosynthesis, degradation and sequestration. The biosynthesis of lutein has been extensively studied and reviewed. This includes the metabolic pathway, transcript regulation and post transcript regulation [2,43,44,45]. The degradation of lutein and other carotenoids by carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs) has also garnered much attention [46,47]. Moreover, carotenoid sequestration has been recognized as an essential factor for carotenoid accumulation in plants [45,48,49]. In contrast, the limitation of lutein sequestration in algae has been neglected. This work thus focuses on surveying current findings and knowledge related to lutein sequestration in microalgae.
As illustrated in Figure 1, the biosynthesis of lutein occurs on the inner chloroplast membrane of plants and algae [50]. Due to the lipophilic characteristic of the unsaturated polyene chain and the hydrophobic hydroxyl groups on the rings, it is difficult for lutein to float freely in the hydrophilic environment of the chloroplast and attaches tightly to the membrane. Thus, once lutein is synthesized, lutein accumulates on the inner chloroplast membrane. Without proper sequestration, this leads to feedback inhibition on lutein synthesis or degradation by ROS or CCDs. Therefore, lutein sequestration is essential for lutein accumulation, and the storage capacity of lutein might determine the upper limit of lutein content in the organisms.
Based on current knowledge, lutein could bond to LHC-associated proteins as a structural and functional pigment involved in light-harvesting and nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) in plant green tissues and microalgae [1,51]. Lutein could also be stored in carotenoid-lipoprotein substructures and the plastoglobuli, an oil environment, within the chromoplasts of flower petals such as marigold. It was found that lutein could be massively accumulated in the plastoglobuli of the petals as an “oil form” [52,53,54]. In contrast, lutein content is usually low in the leaves as a “structural form” in marigold. This difference in the two lutein sequestration methods might lead to the variance in the level of lutein accumulation. Therefore, exploring the storage capacity of lutein under the two methods can provide a rough estimation of the level of content in lutein producing organisms.
A standard is required to estimate the storage capacity of lutein in LHCs and lipid droplets, but there is not a widely accepted, accurate standard to address this problem. Based on current knowledge, the mass ratio between the accumulated lutein and the lutein storage medium can possibly be used to estimate the capacity of lutein sequestration.

2.1. Estimation Of Lutein Storage Capacity in LHCs

As understanding of photosystems (PS) structure in plants and microalgae advances, the amount of lutein and other carotenoid associated with the PS and LHC protein complex becomes clearer [51,55,56]. Most carotenoids involved in photosynthesis are bound to the light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding (Lhcb) protein. The core of photosynthetic systems and cytochrome b6f complex can also attach carotenoids. Lhcb proteins have a similar structure and conserved binding sites for 11–14 chlorophyll molecules and 2–4 carotenoid molecules through plants and microalgae. Here, the Lhcb protein is assumed as the direct lutein container for the purpose of estimating the storage capacity of lutein in structural form. Lhcb protein exhibits a 28.1 kDa mass weight and four carotenoid binding sites, L1, L2, N1, and V1. Lutein can bond to the L1 and L2 sites of Lhcb. Neoxanthin and violaxanthin can bond to the N1 and V1 sites, respectively. Thus, based on the 568.87 Da mass of lutein, lutein’s storage capacity on Lhcb proteins is estimated as 4.1%. In addition, biochemical data suggested that these bonding sites can hold several types of carotenoids due to the similarity of their chemical structures [56]. Therefore, assuming that lutein can bond to all of these sites, the storage capacity of lutein on Lhcb protein is estimated at 4.1–8.1% in terms of mass ratio.
Most lutein/carotenoids involved in the photosynthetic and the nonphotochemical-quenching (NPQ) reaction are bound to Lhc protein-based antenna complexes. However, other photosynthetic proteins such as the core of photosynthetic systems and cytochrome b6f complex can bind carotenoids. Hence, the storage capacity of lutein throughout the photosynthetic system should be addressed.
Unfortunately, the amount of carotenoid associated with the entire photosynthetic system of algal species is not yet clear. Thus, the lutein storage capacity of the photosynthetic system can only be estimated. Since the core complexes of PSII and PSI are largely conserved from cyanobacteria to plants, the amount of carotenoids associated with PSII-LHCII complex in the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana was taken into account [57]. In A. thaliana, the basic unit of the PSII-LHCII complex is the protein complex C2S2M2. The protein mass of C2S2M2 is around 1.1MDa, and in this complex it binds 75 carotenoid molecules [58]. Therefore, assuming that the 75 carotenoids are all lutein, the storage capacity of lutein in the PSII-LHCII complex is around 3.9%. Since the antenna size and composition may vary in diverse organisms, the 4% of lutein storage capacity on this “structural form” is estimated based on the aforementioned knowledge.

2.2. Estimated Storage Capacity of Lutein in Lipid Droplets

It has been found that carotenoids could be massively concentrated in variety of lipid environments [59,60,61]. For example, over 50% (w/w) of β-carotene was stored in the specialized plastoglobules of Dunaliella bardawil. Haematococcus pluvialis was found to accumulate 40% of the dry cell weight (DCW) as cytoplasmic lipid droplets (CLD); 4% DCW of the astaxanthin was concentrated in the CLD. Similarly, the majority of lutein was also found concentrated in the plastoglobules of marigold petals [62]. Unfortunately, the mass ratio between lutein and the plastoglobules in the marigold is not yet apparent. Considering the effect that 20 wt % lutein could be sequestrated in corn oil and 10% astaxanthin has been stored in the CLD of H. pluvialis [63], it can be assumed hypothetically that lutein could have 10–20% storage capacity in the “oil form” because of the similarity in lutein and astaxanthin’s chemical structures.

2.3. Limits of Structural Lutein Content due to Its Function

The nature of lutein as a structural carotenoid determines that its contents will be low, as required to fulfill photochemical functions. The storage capacity of lutein in the structural form was estimated as 4% versus 10–20% in the oil form. To sequestrate 2% DCW of lutein in the structural form, the algal cell needs to produce 50% DCW of photosynthetic protein for lutein storage. Consider the optimum protein content of different algal strains: Chlorella spp. (50–60%, DCW), Chlamydomonas spp. (48%, DCW), Scenedesmus obliquus (50–56%, DCW) and Dunaliella salina (57%, DCW) [64]. It is almost impossible for algal strains to synthesize over 50% DCW of photosynthetic proteins for the 2% DCW of lutein sequestration as a structural pigment. The nature of lutein as a structural carotenoid determines that its content will not be very high in fulfilling photochemical functions in microalgae. The data used to calculate lutein storage capacity in LHCs is based on that of higher plants. However, the content of LHCs protein to total protein varies in different algal strains. Considering the conserved structure of LHCs in algae and higher plants, using the above method to estimate the lutein storage capacity in LHCs and lipid droplets is assumed acceptable.
Sequestering lutein in lipid offers a much greater potential, as microalgae could accumulate up to 40–60% DCW as lipids [65]. Based on the lutein storage capacity in the oil form, algal cells would only need to generate 10–20% DCW of lipids for the sequestration of 2% DCW of lutein. Therefore, lutein sequestration in “oil form” presents a significantly higher lutein storage upper limit than the “structural form.” Exploring the method to accumulate lutein in oil form could result in a higher lutein content in algal cells.

3. Limitation of Lutein Sequestration in Algal Oil Droplets

Theoretically, lutein sequestration in the lipid environment provides a higher capacity than bonding to the photosystems. However, lutein and lutein ester could be highly concentrated in the plastoglobule of marigold [52,66]. A massive amount of β-carotene was sequestrated in the special plastoglobules of Dunaliella spp. [41,67]. Astaxanthin and astaxanthin esters could accumulate in the cytoplasmatic lipid droplets (CLD) in Haematococcus spp. and C. zofingiensis [68,69,70]. Few studies have found that lutein can accumulate in the lipid droplet of microalgae species. Thus, several major barriers may prevent the sequestration of lutein in the lipid droplets algal species as discussed below.

3.1. Lutein Degradation without Proper Sequestration

Without proper sequestration, lutein is trapped on chloroplast membranes and increases the possibility of degradation under the stress of UV-light, heat, ROS and by the catalyzation of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs). The two hydroxyl-groups on the chemical structure of lutein trap it on the surface, or inside, the chloroplast’s inner membrane. A similar phenomenon has been investigated in vitro by exploring the effect of carotenoid incorporation into liposomes [71,72]. Lutein can be incorporated tightly with phospholipid membranes as its polar hydroxyl-groups intercalates into the membrane structure and interact with the polar sides and the membranes’ aqueous environment. The rigidity of the phospholipid membrane is positively correlated with the amount of lutein incorporated.
Therefore, without the assembly of lutein into photosynthetic proteins or the trafficking of lutein into the lipid droplet, lutein could be concentrated in the inner envelope membrane with the thylakoid membrane. This leads to feedback limitation on lutein biosynthesis and the degradation of lutein via photo-oxidation and carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCDs) catalyzation [45,47].
Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs) constitute a widespread enzyme family consisting of an activation center on top of the structure and a Fe2+ ion, coordinated with four histidine residues [73,74]. The Fe2+ ion activates oxygen, which is involved with the reaction center. The activated oxygen cleaves the carbon-carbon double bond on the polyene chain of the carotenoid’s structure. The CCDs protein is located at the envelope and plastoglobuli membrane of arabidopsis [75,76,77]. It is also located on the chromoplast membrane of watermelon, tomato, carrot, cauliflower, papaya, pepper and citrus [78,79].
Although the effect of CCD expression on carotenoid accumulation was not evident in microalgae species, proteomics data of C. reinhardtii indicated that a protein located in eyespot was homologous to the CCDs of Synechocystis spp. [80]. Thus, CCDs may still degrade different kinds of carotenoids, including lutein, in microalgal species. Since lutein is vulnerable under ROS stress and easily degraded by CCDs without LHC storage, it is critical to better preserve lutein in this condition. The esterification of lutein could address this problem. However, lutein cannot be esterified in most algal strains, as discussed below.

3.2. Lack of Lutein Esterification Mechanism

Carotenoid esterification implies that one or two of the hydroxyl-group on the carotenoid is esterified with fatty acid. Carotenoid esters are common in flower petals such as marigold, senescent leaves, as well as fruits of potato plant, chili peppers, vegetables and some algal strains such as Haematococcus spp. and C. zofingiensis [28,68,81,82,83,84].
The esterification of hydroxyl-carotenoids has received extensive attention in recent years. The ester condition could provide an additional positive attribute that enhances several properties of hydroxyl-carotenoid. The ester condition significantly increases the stability of hydroxyl-carotenoid under UV stress, ROS stress and heat treatment [85,86,87,88].
Esterification of carotenoids may integrate carotenoids into different kinds of lipid droplets [82]. Studies suggested a relationship between carotenoid esters and lipid droplet development in plants [89]. For example, the xanthophylls could not be esterified in a tomato mutant, which was accompanied by decreased carotenoid accumulation and fewer fully developed plastoglobules in petals. Therefore, esterification could increase the stability of carotenoids both in vitro under UV light and heat treatments and could also integrate carotenoids into lipid droplets. Introducing the esterification reaction of lutein in microalgae could better preserve lutein under stress conditions. However, the access to lipid droplets remains another barrier for sequestration of lutein or lutein ester in microalgae.

3.3. Lipid Droplet Access Limitation

Three types of lipid droplets were found in microalgal strains: eyespot, βC-plastoglobule and cytoplasmic lipid droplets (CLD) [90,91,92]. The biogenesis of lutein, eyespot, and βC-plastoglobule occurs in the chloroplasts of algal cells. In theory, eyespot and βC-plastoglobule could be the sink for lutein sequestration. However, eyespot and βC-plastoglobule biogenesis are missing in most lutein-producing strains, and massive β-carotene accumulates only in the lipid vessels of a few microalgal species [67,92].
Most microalgae strains consist of CLD in the cytoplasm, which only accumulates an amount of neutral lipids [91]. However, the carotenoid-containing CLD has only been found in Haematococcus spp. and C. zofingiensis [68,69,83,93]. A β-carotene transport mechanism was suggested in Haematococcus spp., which channeled the β-carotene from the chloroplast to the CLD. β-carotene was then converted into astaxanthin and astaxanthin esters, which were sequestrated in the CLD of Haematococcus spp. [68]. For C. zofingiensis, the MVA pathway was triggered with the biogenesis of CLD, which synthesized astaxanthin and keto-lutein in the cytoplasm. Esterified astaxanthin and keto-lutein are concentrated in the CLD of C. zofingiensis [83]. Therefore, without biogenesis of lipid droplets in the chloroplast and the transport mechanism that channels lutein into the cytoplasm, it is difficult for lutein to access lipid droplets.
The accessibility of lutein to the lipid droplet must be “granted” in microalgal strains. Currently, the mechanism of the biogenesis of βC-plastoglobules in Dunaliella spp. is still unclear, as is the mechanism of the β-carotene trafficking through chloroplast membrane in Haematococcus spp. and C. zofingiensis. Exploring the two mechanisms depends on further proteomic research and a deeper understanding of the regulation of carotenoid accumulation in these microalgal strains.

4. Strategies to Overcome These Barriers

To overcome these barriers, systematic research on the mechanism of regulation of carotenoid sequestration in microalgae is warranted. Due to multiple barriers, enabling the sequestration of lutein in the lipid droplet may not be achieved by solving just one or two of these problems. However, investigating specific issues could create a foundation for addressing this problem. Therefore, the strategies are prioritized according to their feasibility with supporting discussions.

4.1. Lutein Esterification Gene and Mechanisms

The understanding of the carotenoid esterification mechanism has made significant progress in recent years. The Pale Yellow Patel 1 (PYP1) gene has been identified and isolated in a tomato mutant [89]. Evidence indicates that mutation of the PYP1 gene results in the loss of xanthophyll esters. This is accompanied by decreasing total carotenoid yield and a reduction in fully developed plastoglobules in petals. Studies suggested that PYP1 is highly relevant to the xanthophyll esterification reaction in tomato flowers [89]. This is further supported by a study characterizing the Pale Yellow Patel (PYP)/Xanthophyll esterase (XES) gene family in citrus [94]. Results show that the transcript level of PYP1, 2 and 6 are correlated with carotenoid ester content in citrus, and the expression of PYP accords with the low level of xanthophyll esters in yellow citrus. Similar results were found in petunias [95]. The XES from morning glory, tomato and marigold have been expressed in petunias. This results in a strong positive correlation between the expression of XES genes and xanthophyll esterification content. Besides, the expression of XES leads to an increase in the percentage of xanthophyll esters in transgenic mutants.
Unfortunately, the function of the PYP/XES gene has not yet been characterized in vitro. The enzymatic condition and the substrate preference are still unclear. It was found that xanthophylls were not esterified after the XES genes were expressed in petunia leaves. This implied that the XES might prefer a lipophilic environment, such as plastoglobules [95]. Therefore, comprehensive characterization of the PYP/XES function in vitro is needed before the heterologous expression of microalgae and other species.
Xanthophyll acyltransferase (XAT) was first isolated in bread wheat [82]. It was found that the function of this enzyme is necessary for carotenoid esterification, both in vitro and in vivo. The enzymatic condition of XAT was also characterized. Results show that XAT can catalyze the esterification reaction of lutein, zeaxanthin and β-cryptoxanthin with a wide range of acyl-donor substrates, such as triglycerides, 1,2-diglycerides, lysophosphotidylcholine, free fatty acids, 1,3-diglycerides and monoglycerides.
XAT can esterify lutein with a wide range of acyl-donor substrates. Triglycerides and free fatty acids can accumulate to high levels in the cytoplasm and the chloroplast of algal cells. Therefore, XAT is an excellent candidate to explore lutein esterification’s effect on the accumulation of lutein in microalgal cells.

4.2. Suppression of the Gene Expression of CCDs in Microalgae

Evidence from transgenic studies indicates that the expression of CCDs is critical to the regulation of carotenoid accumulation in plants. The high transcriptional level of CCDs results in white petals and low carotenoid content in lilies and chrysanthemums [96,97]. Similarly, a negative correlation between the expression of CCDs and carotenoid accumulation has been found in arabidopsis, peach fruit, and potatoes [98,99,100,101]. Furthermore, suppressing the expression of CCDs by RNAi interference results in a three to six times higher carotenoid content in the petal of the mutants than in the wild-type of chrysanthemum [97]. However, the color of the petals remained yellow in transgenesis lines, while the wild type lost its color. Conflicting results were found in morning glory and citrus [102,103]. The results indicated that the transcriptional level of CCDs, or the overexpression of CCDs, affected carotenoid accumulation.
In microalgae, the function and the localization of CCDs enzymes and the effect of CCDs expression on carotenoids accumulation are still poorly understood. Proteomics data of C. reinhardtii revealed that a protein located in the eyespot was homologous to the CCDs of Synechocystis spp. [80]. Several CCDs homologous proteins in other algal strains have also been found in the NCBI database, for example, D. salina (APW83743.1); Scenedesmus spp. (KAF8065651.1); C. sorokiniana (PRW57550.1). Therefore, investigating the correlation between CCDs expression and carotenoid accumulation could elucidate carotenoid accumulation in microalgae. Findings about the effects of CCDs expression on the carotenoid accumulation in plants suggest that suppressing the expression of this gene in green algae by genetic modification may increase carotenoid content in green algae.

4.3. Investigation of the Mechanisms of βC-Plastoglobuli Biogenesis in Dunaliella spp. and the Carotenoid Trafficking Mechanisms in Haematococcus spp. and C. zofingiensis

Investigating the mechanisms of biogenesis in βC-plastoglobules in Dunaliella spp. and of the trafficking of β-carotene through the chloroplast membrane in Haematococcus spp. and C. zofingiensis are systematic and complex studies. Exploring the two mechanisms requires additional proteomic research, further understanding of the regulation of carotenoid accumulation in these microalgal strains, and the advanced genetic toolbox in microalgal species.

4.4. Future Perspectives

The development of a cell factory for lutein production in microalgae demands further exploration on the regulation of lutein biosynthesis, degradation and sequestration in microalgal species. The regulation of lutein biosynthesis has garnered considerable attention in recent years. However, the sequestration of lutein plays a critical role in the accumulation of lutein. Future research on this topic is warranted.
Several critical barriers block lutein sequestration in lipid droplets in microalgal species. The exploration of lipid droplet biogenesis in the chloroplast, carotenoid cross membrane mechanisms, and carotenoid esterification mechanisms rely on an optimized genetic engineering toolbox for different microalgal species. Unfortunately, the toolbox is still in the formative stage for most microalgae.
Investigating similar mechanisms by using a model yeast strain such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Yarrowia lipolytica, with their relatively simple cell structure, and with a more mature genetic engineering toolbox, could help understand the carotenoid sequestration mechanisms.
The nonconventional oleaginous yeast Y. lipolytica has been engineered as a cell factory for production of different carotenoids due to several unique features [104,105,106]. On one hand, Y. lipolytica can accumulate a massive amount of acetyl-CoA as a precursor of the mevalonate pathway, which provides sufficient geranyl diphosphate (GPP), farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) and geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) as the intermediates for the accumulation of carotenoids [107,108]. On the other hand, large amounts of oil are accumulated in the lipid droplets of Y. lipolytica that provide a desired lipophilic container for carotenoid storage [104,107]. Although lutein biosynthesis has not been achieved in Y. lipolytica, due to the similarity of chemical structure its isomer zeaxanthin could be used to investigate carotenoid esterification mechanisms and other mechanisms of carotenoid sequestration.

5. Conclusions

Several microalgae species with high lutein content (~1% of the dry cell weight) have been reportedly isolated. However, compared with the level of β-carotene concentrates in Dunaliella spp. (up to 14% of dry weight) and astaxanthin in Haematococcus spp. (up to 5% of dry weight), several potential limiting factors for lutein accumulation in microalgae species must be identified and addressed to achieve higher levels for greater feasibility of commercialization. Since sequestration is critical for lutein accumulation, the concept of lutein storage capacity was proposed to estimate the lutein storage upper limit in lipid droplets and LHCs.
A lutein storage capacity of 4 and 10–20% was estimated in LHCs and lipid droplets, respectively. According to the optimum protein content in microalgalspecies, it is almost impossible to sequestrate 2% DCW of lutein in LHCs. Although enabling lutein to be stored in the lipid droplet could help increase lutein content in microalgae species, accessing lipid droplets and degradation in the inner envelope of the chloroplast are the main barriers to overcome to make it happen. Further exploration on lipid droplet biogenesis, carotenoid trafficking mechanisms, carotenoid esterification mechanisms and other carotenoid accumulation and regulation mechanisms may open future possibilities.

Author Contributions

S.C. suggested the outline of this review paper. Y.X. developed this review paper based on the comprehensive literature review. Both Y.X. and S.C. finalized the topic of this review. S.C. and X.X. helped with the revision of this review paper and gave final approval of the version to be sent to the journal. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dall’Osto, L.; Lico, C.; Alric, J.; Giuliano, G.; Havaux, M.; Bassi, R. Lutein is needed for efficient chlorophyll triplet quenching in the major LHCII antenna complex of higher plants and effective photoprotection in vivo under strong light. BMC Plant Biol. 2006, 6, 32. [Google Scholar]
  2. Takaichi, S. Carotenoids in Algae: Distributions, Biosyntheses and Functions. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1101–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, L.; Shao, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Q. Regulation of Carotenoid Metabolism in Tomato. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fernández-Sevilla, J.M.; Fernández, F.G.A.; Grima, E.M. Biotechnological production of lutein and its applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Agatonovic-Kustrin, S.; Morton, D.W. Cosmeceuticals Derived from Bioactive Substances Found in Marine Algae. Oceanography 2013, 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  6. Carpentier, S.; Knaus, M.; Suh, M. Associations between Lutein, Zeaxanthin, and Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Overview. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bone, R.A.; Landrum, J.T.; Dixon, Z.; Chen, Y.; Llerena, C.M. Lutein and Zeaxanthin in the Eyes, Serum and Diet of Human Subjects. Exp. Eye Res. 2000, 71, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bartlett, H.E.; Eperjesi, F.; Eperjesi, H.E.B. Effect of lutein and antioxidant dietary supplementation on contrast sensitivity in age-related macular disease: A randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 1121–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Erdman, J.J.W.; Smith, J.W.; Kuchan, M.J.; Mohn, E.S.; Johnson, E.J.; Rubakhin, S.S.; Wang, L.; Sweedler, J.V.; Neuringer, M. Lutein and Brain Function. Foods 2015, 4, 547–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Nishino, H.; Murakoshi, M.; Tokuda, H.; Satomi, Y. Cancer prevention by carotenoids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 483, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kritchevsky, S.B. β-Carotene, Carotenoids and the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease. J. Nutr. 1999, 129, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ribaya-Mercado, J.D.; Blumberg, J.B. Lutein and Zeaxanthin and Their Potential Roles in Disease Prevention. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2004, 23, 567S–587S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lin, J.-H.; Lee, D.-J.; Chang, J.-S. Lutein production from biomass: Marigold flowers versus microalgae. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 184, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vasudevan, P.; Kashyap, S.; Sharma, S. Tagetes: A multipurpose plant. Bioresour. Technol. 1997, 62, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cui, Z.-H.; Sun, H.-J.; Gao, C.-L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.-J. Research on Extraction Technology of Lutein from Marigold. Liaoning Chem. Ind. 2008, 4, 7. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shi, X.-M.; Chen, F. High-yield production of lutein by the green microalga Chlorella protothecoidesin heterotrophic fed-batch culture. Biotechnol. Prog. 2002, 18, 723–727. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ho, S.-H.; Chan, M.-C.; Liu, C.-C.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lee, W.-L.; Lee, D.-J.; Chang, J.-S. Enhancing lutein productivity of an indigenous microalga Scenedesmus obliquus FSP-3 using light-related strategies. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 152, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Del Campo, J.A.; Moreno, J.; Rodríguez, H.; Vargas, M.A.; Rivas, J.; Guerrero, M.G. Carotenoid Content of Chlorophycean Microalgae: Factors Determining Lutein Accumulation in Muriellopsis Sp.(Chlorophyta). J. Biotechnol. 2000, 76, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ye, Z.-W.; Jiang, J.-G.; Wu, G.-H. Biosynthesis and regulation of carotenoids in Dunaliella: Progresses and prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Xie, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, R.; Ho, S.-H.; Shi, X.; Liu, L.; Chen, J. Bioprocess operation strategies with mixotrophy/photoinduction to enhance lutein production of microalga Chlorella sorokiniana FZU60. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 290, 121798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Xie, Y.; Li, J.; Ho, S.-H.; Ma, R.; Shi, X.; Liu, L.; Chen, J. Pilot-scale cultivation of Chlorella sorokiniana FZU60 with a mixotrophy/photoautotrophy two-stage strategy for efficient lutein production. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 314, 123767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Heo, J.; Shin, D.-S.; Cho, K.; Cho, D.-H.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, H.-S. Indigenous microalga Parachlorella sp. JD-076 as a potential source for lutein production: Optimization of lutein productivity via regulation of light intensity and carbon source. Algal Res. 2018, 33, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, Y.; Zhao, X.; Chen, J.; Yang, X.; Ho, S.-H.; Wang, B.; Chang, J.-S.; Shen, Y. Enhancing cell growth and lutein productivity of Desmodesmus sp. F51 by optimal utilization of inorganic carbon sources and ammonium salt. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 664–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, J.-H.; Chen, C.-Y.; Chang, J.-S. Lutein production with wild-type and mutant strains of Chlorella sorokiniana MB-1 under mixotrophic growth. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 79, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gan, S.Y.; Maggs, C.A. Random mutagenesis and precise gene editing technologies: Applications in algal crop improvement and functional genomics. Eur. J. Phycol. 2017, 52, 466–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cordero, B.F.; Obraztsova, I.; Couso, I.; Leon, R.; Vargas, M.A.; Rodriguez, H. Enhancement of Lutein Production in Chlorella sorokiniana (Chorophyta) by Improvement of Culture Conditions and Random Mutagenesis. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1607–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Del Campo, J.A.; Moreno, J.; Rivas, J.; Guerrero, M.G. Accumulation of astaxanthin and lutein in Chlorella zofingiensis (Chlorophyta). Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 64, 848–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, W.; Lin, Y.; He, M.; Gong, Y.; Huang, J. Induced High-Yield Production of Zeaxanthin, Lutein, and β-Carotene by a Mutant of Chlorella zofingiensis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 891–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Couso, I.; Vila, M.; Rodriguez, H.; Vargas, M.A.; León, R. Overexpression of an exogenous phytoene synthase gene in the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii leads to an increase in the content of carotenoids. Biotechnol. Prog. 2011, 27, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cordero, B.F.; Couso, I.; León, R.; Rodríguez, H.; Vargas, M.Á. Enhancement of Carotenoids Biosynthesis in Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii by Nuclear Transformation Using a Phytoene Synthase Gene Isolated from Chlorella Zofingiensis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 91, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, J.; Sun, Z.; Gerken, H.; Huang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, F. Genetic engineering of the green alga Chlorella zofingiensis: A modified norflurazon-resistant phytoene desaturase gene as a dominant selectable marker. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 5069–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Morikawa, T.; Uraguchi, Y.; Sanda, S.; Nakagawa, S.; Sawayama, S. Overexpression of Dnaj-Like Chaperone Enhances Carotenoid Synthesis in Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018, 184, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Saini, D.K.; Chakdar, H.; Pabbi, S.; Shukla, P. Enhancing production of microalgal biopigments through metabolic and genetic engineering. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 391–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patel, V.K.; Soni, N.; Prasad, V.; Sapre, A.; Dasgupta, S.; Bhadra, B. CRISPR–Cas9 System for Genome Engineering of Photosynthetic Microalgae. Mol. Biotechnol. 2019, 61, 541–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mosey, M.; Douchi, D.; Knoshaug, E.P.; Laurens, L.M. Methodological review of genetic engineering approaches for non-model algae. Algal Res. 2021, 54, 102221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Baek, K.; Yu, J.; Jeong, J.; Sim, S.J.; Bae, S.; Jin, E. Photoautotrophic production of macular pigment in a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strain generated by using DNA-free CRISPR-Cas9 RNP-mediated mutagenesis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017, 115, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Polle, J.E.; Barry, K.; Cushman, J.; Schmutz, J.; Tran, D.; Hathwaik, L.T.; Yim, W.C.; Jenkins, J.; McKie-Krisberg, Z.; Prochnik, S.; et al. Draft Nuclear Genome Sequence of the Halophilic and Beta-Carotene-Accumulating Green Alga Dunaliella Salina Strain Ccap19/18. Genome Announc. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Sun, T.H.; Zhou, F.; Liu, C.J.; Zhuang, Z.; Lu, S. The Dnaj-Like Zinc Finger Domain Protein Orange Localizes to the Nucleus in Etiolated Cotyledons of Arabidopsis Thaliana. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 1599–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Park, S.; Kim, H.S.; Jung, Y.J.; Kim, S.H.; Ji, C.Y.; Wang, Z.; Jeong, J.C.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, S.Y.; Kwak, S.-S. Orange protein has a role in phytoene synthase stabilization in sweetpotato. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chayut, N.; Yuan, H.; Ohali, S.; Meir, A.; Sa’ar, U.; Tzuri, G.; Zheng, Y.; Mazourek, M.; Gepstein, S.; Zhou, X. Distinct Mechanisms of the Orange Protein in Controlling Carotenoid Flux. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pourkarimi, S.; Hallajisani, A.; Alizadehdakhel, A.; Nouralishahi, A.; Golzary, A. Factors affecting production of beta-carotene from Dunaliella salina microalgae. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 101771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mobin, S.; Alam, F. Some Promising Microalgal Species for Commercial Applications: A review. Energy Procedia 2017, 110, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kumar, S.; Gill, B.S.; Verma, A.; Verma, M.L.; Kushwaha, R. Biotechnological production of high-valued algal astaxanthin and lutein under different growth conditions. In Biotechnological Production of Bioactive Compounds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 191–220. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gong, M.; Bassi, A. Carotenoids from microalgae: A review of recent developments. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 1396–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nisar, N.; Li, L.; Lu, S.; Khin, N.C.; Pogson, B.J. Carotenoid Metabolism in Plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Liang, M.-H.; Zhu, J.; Jiang, J.-G. Carotenoids biosynthesis and cleavage related genes from bacteria to plants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2314–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Walter, M.H.; Strack, D. Carotenoids and their cleavage products: Biosynthesis and functions. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 663–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sun, T.; Yuan, H.; Cao, H.; Yazdani, M.; Tadmor, Y.; Li, L. Carotenoid Metabolism in Plants: The Role of Plastids. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Cazzonelli, C.I.; Pogson, B.J. Source to sink: Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Varela, J.C.; Pereira, H.; Vila, M.; León, R. Production of Carotenoids by Microalgae: Achievements and Challenges. Photosynth. Res. 2015, 125, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Crepin, A.; Caffarri, S. Functions and Evolution of Lhcb Isoforms Composing LHCII, the Major Light Harvesting Complex of Photosystem II of Green Eukaryotic Organisms. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2018, 19, 699–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Deineka, V.I.; Sorokopudov, V.N.; Deineka, L.A.; Tret’Yakov, M.Y. Flowers of marigold (Tagetes) species as a source of xanthophylls. Pharm. Chem. J. 2007, 41, 540–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hadden, W.L.; Watkins, R.H.; Levy, L.W.; Regalado, E.; Rivadeneira, D.M.; Van Breemen, R.B.; Schwartz, S.J. Carotenoid composition of marigold (Tagetes erecta) flower extract used as nutritional supplement. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4189–4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vanegas-Espinoza, P.E.; Ramos-Viveros, V.; Jiménez-Aparicio, A.R.; López-Villegas, O.; Heredia-Mira, F.J.; Meléndez-Martínez, A.J.; Quintero-Gutiérrez, A.G.; Paredes-López, O.; Del Villar-Martínez, A.A.; Villar-Martínez, A.A. Plastid analysis of pigmented undifferentiated cells of marigold Tagetes erecta L. by transmission electron microscopy. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2011, 47, 596–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pagliano, C.; Saracco, G.; Barber, J. Structural, functional and auxiliary proteins of photosystem II. Photosynth. Res. 2013, 116, 167–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Pan, X.; Cao, P.; Su, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, M. Structural analysis and comparison of light-harvesting complexes I and II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2020, 1861, 148038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nelson, N.; Junge, W. Structure and Energy Transfer in Photosystems of Oxygenic Photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015, 84, 659–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dekker, J.P.; Boekema, E.J. Supramolecular organization of thylakoid membrane proteins in green plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2005, 1706, 12–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ben-Amotz, A.; Lers, A.; Avron, M. Stereoisomers of β-Carotene and Phytoene in the Alga Dunaliella bardawil. Plant Physiol. 1988, 86, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ben-Amotz, A.; Shaish, A.; Avron, M. Mode of Action of the Massively Accumulated β-Carotene of Dunaliella bardawil in Protecting the Alga against Damage by Excess Irradiation. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 1040–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Shah, M.R.; Liang, Y.; Cheng, J.J.; Daroch, M. Astaxanthin-Producing Green Microalga Haematococcus pluvialis: From Single Cell to High Value Commercial Products. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Del Villar-Martínez, A.A.; García-Saucedo, P.A.; Carabez-Trejo, A.; Cruz-Hernández, A.; Paredes-Lópeza, O. Carotenogenic gene expression and ultrastructural changes during development in marigold. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 1046–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Amar, I.; Aserin, A.A.; Garti, N. Solubilization Patterns of Lutein and Lutein Esters in Food Grade Nonionic Microemulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4775–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Becker, E. Micro-algae as a source of protein. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 207–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sajjadi, B.; Chen, W.-Y.; Raman, A.A.A.; Ibrahim, S. Microalgae lipid and biomass for biofuel production: A comprehensive review on lipid enhancement strategies and their effects on fatty acid composition. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 97, 200–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Moehs, C.P.; Tian, L.; Osteryoung, K.W.; DellaPenna, D. Analysis of carotenoid biosynthetic gene expression during marigold petal development. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 45, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Davidi, L.; Levin, Y.; Ben-Dor, S.; Pick, U. Proteome Analysis of Cytoplasmatic and Plastidic β-Carotene Lipid Droplets in Dunaliella bardawil. Plant Physiol. 2014, 167, 60–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Chen, G.; Wang, B.; Han, D.; Sommerfeld, M.; Lu, Y.; Chen, F.; Hu, Q. Molecular mechanisms of the coordination between astaxanthin and fatty acid biosynthesis inHaematococcus pluvialis(Chlorophyceae). Plant J. 2014, 81, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, Z.; Sun, D.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, F. Glucose triggers cell structure changes and regulates astaxanthin biosynthesis in Chromochloris zofingiensis. Algal Res. 2019, 39, 101455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, Z.; Sun, D.; Mao, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, F. The crosstalk between astaxanthin, fatty acids and reactive oxygen species in heterotrophic Chlorella zofingiensis. Algal Res. 2016, 19, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tan, C.; Xue, J.; Abbas, S.; Feng, B.; Zhang, X.; Xia, S. Liposome as a Delivery System for Carotenoids: Comparative Antioxidant Activity of Carotenoids As Measured by Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power, DPPH Assay and Lipid Peroxidation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6726–6735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pintea, A.; Diehl, H.A.; Momeu, C.; Aberle, L.; Socaciu, C. Incorporation of carotenoid esters into liposomes. Biophys. Chem. 2005, 118, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kloer, D.P.; Ruch, S.; Al-Babili, S.; Beyer, P.; Schulz, G.E. The Structure of a Retinal-Forming Carotenoid Oxygenase. Science 2005, 308, 267–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Sui, X.; Kiser, P.D.; Von Lintig, J.; Palczewski, K. Structural basis of carotenoid cleavage: From bacteria to mammals. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 539, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Joyard, J.; Ferro, M.; Masselon, C.; Seigneurin-Berny, D.; Salvi, D.; Garin, J.; Rolland, N. Chloroplast Proteomics and the Compartmentation of Plastidial Isoprenoid Biosynthetic Pathways. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 1154–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ytterberg, A.J.; Peltier, J.-B.; Van Wijk, K.J. Protein Profiling of Plastoglobules in Chloroplasts and Chromoplasts. A Surprising Site for Differential Accumulation of Metabolic Enzymes. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 984–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Vidi, P.A.; Kanwischer, M.; Baginsky, S.; Austin, J.R.; Csucs, G.; Dörmann, P.; Kessler, F.; Bréhélin, C. Tocopherol Cyclase (Vte1) Localization and Vitamin E Accumulation in Chloroplast Plastoglobule Lipoprotein Particles. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 11225–11234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Wang, Y.-Q.; Yang, Y.; Fei, Z.; Yuan, H.; Fish, T.; Thannhauser, T.W.; Mazourek, M.; Kochian, L.V.; Wang, X.; Li, L. Proteomic analysis of chromoplasts from six crop species reveals insights into chromoplast function and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 949–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Zeng, Y.; Pan, Z.; Ding, Y.; Zhu, A.; Cao, H.; Xu, Q.; Deng, X. A proteomic analysis of the chromoplasts isolated from sweet orange fruits [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck]. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 5297–5309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Schmidt, M.; Geßner, G.; Luff, M.; Heiland, I.; Wagner, V.; Kaminski, M.; Geimer, S.; Eitzinger, N.; Reißenweber, T.; Voytsekh, O.; et al. Proteomic Analysis of the Eyespot of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Provides Novel Insights into Its Components and Tactic Movements. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1908–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Mercadante, A.Z.; Rodrigues, D.B.; Petry, F.C.; Mariutti, L.R.B. Carotenoid esters in foods—A review and practical directions on analysis and occurrence. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 830–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Watkins, J.L.; Li, M.; McQuinn, R.P.; Chan, K.X.; McFarlane, H.E.; Ermakova, M.; Furbank, R.T.; Mares, D.; Dong, C.; Chalmers, K.J.; et al. A GDSL Esterase/Lipase Catalyzes the Esterification of Lutein in Bread Wheat. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 3092–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhang, Y.; Ye, Y.; Ding, W.; Mao, X.; Li, Y.; Gerken, H.; Liu, J. Astaxanthin Is Ketolated from Zeaxanthin Independent of Fatty Acid Synthesis in Chromochloris zofingiensis. Plant Physiol. 2020, 183, 883–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Breithaupt, D.E.; Bamedi, A. Carotenoids and Carotenoid Esters in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosumL.): New Insights into an Ancient Vegetable. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 7175–7181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jacob, K.; Garcia-Alonso, F.J.; Ros, G.; Periago, M.J. Stability of carotenoids, phenolic compounds, ascorbic acid and antioxidant capacity of tomatoes during thermal processing. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr. 2010, 60, 192. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Schaub, P.; Rodriguez-Franco, M.; Cazzonelli, C.I.; Alvarez, D.; Wüst, F.; Welsch, R. Establishment of an Arabidopsis callus system to study the interrelations of biosynthesis, degradation and accumulation of carotenoids. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Subagio, A.; Wakaki, H.; Morita, N. Stability of Lutein and Its Myristate Esters. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1999, 63, 1784–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Fu, H.; Xie, B.; Fan, G.; Ma, S.; Zhu, X.; Pan, S. Effect of esterification with fatty acid of β-cryptoxanthin on its thermal stability and antioxidant activity by chemiluminescence method. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ariizumi, T.; Kishimoto, S.; Kakami, R.; Maoka, T.; Hirakawa, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Ozeki, Y.; Shirasawa, K.; Bernillon, S.; Okabe, Y.; et al. Identification of the carotenoid modifying genePALE YELLOW PETAL 1as an essential factor in xanthophyll esterification and yellow flower pigmentation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Plant J. 2014, 79, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kreimer, G. The green algal eyespot apparatus: A primordial visual system and more? Curr. Genet. 2008, 55, 19–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Goold, H.; Beisson, F.; Peltier, G.; Li-Beisson, Y. Microalgal lipid droplets: Composition, diversity, biogenesis and functions. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Pick, U.; Zarka, A.; Boussiba, S.; Davidi, L. A hypothesis about the origin of carotenoid lipid droplets in the green algae Dunaliella and Haematococcus. Planta 2018, 249, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Grünewald, K.; Hirschberg, J.; Hagen, C. Ketocarotenoid Biosynthesis Outside of Plastids in the Unicellular Green Alga Haematococcus pluvialis. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 6023–6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Zacarías-García, J.; Lux, P.E.; Carle, R.; Schweiggert, R.M.; Steingass, C.B.; Zacarías, L.; Rodrigo, M.J. Characterization of the Pale Yellow Petal/Xanthophyll Esterase Gene Family in Citrus as Candidates for Carotenoid Esterification in Fruits. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kishimoto, S.; Oda-Yamamizo, C.; Ohmiya, A. Heterologous expression of xanthophyll esterase genes affects carotenoid accumulation in petunia corollas. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hai, N.T.L.; Masuda, J.-I.; Miyajima, I.; Thien, N.Q.; Mojtahedi, N.; Hiramatsu, M.; Kim, J.-H.; Okubo, H. Involvement of Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase 4 Gene in Tepal Color Change in Lilium brownii var. colchesteri. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2012, 81, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Ohmiya, A.; Kishimoto, S.; Aida, R.; Yoshioka, S.; Sumitomo, K. Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase (CmCCD4a) Contributes to White Color Formation in Chrysanthemum Petals. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Auldridge, M.E.; Block, A.; Vogel, J.T.; Dabney-Smith, C.; Mila, I.; Bouzayen, M.; Magallanes-Lundback, M.; DellaPenna, D.; McCarty, D.R.; Klee, H.J. Characterization of three members of the Arabidopsis carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase family demonstrates the divergent roles of this multifunctional enzyme family. Plant J. 2006, 45, 982–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Brandi, F.; Bar, E.; Mourgues, F.; Horváth, G.; Turcsi, E.; Giuliano, G.; Liverani, A.; Tartarini, S.; Lewinsohn, E.; Rosati, C. Study of ’Redhaven’ peach and its white-fleshed mutant suggests a key role of CCD4 carotenoid dioxygenase in carotenoid and norisoprenoid volatile metabolism. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Campbell, R.; Ducreux, L.J.; Morris, W.L.; Morris, J.A.; Suttle, J.C.; Ramsay, G.; Bryan, G.J.; Hedley, P.E.; Taylor, M.A. The Metabolic and Developmental Roles of Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase 4 from Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L). Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Gonzalez-Jorge, S.; Ha, S.-H.; Magallanes-Lundback, M.; Gilliland, L.U.; Zhou, A.; Lipka, A.E.; Nguyen, Y.-N.; Angelovici, R.; Lin, H.; Cepela, J.; et al. Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenase4 Is a Negative Regulator of β-Carotene Content in Arabidopsis Seeds. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 4812–4826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Yamamizo, C.; Kishimoto, S.; Ohmiya, A. Carotenoid composition and carotenogenic gene expression during Ipomoea petal development. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 61, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Kato, M.; Matsumoto, H.; Ikoma, Y.; Okuda, H.; Yano, M. The role of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases in the regulation of carotenoid profiles during maturation in citrus fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 2153–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Matthäus, F.; Ketelhot, M.; Gatter, M.; Barth, G. Production of Lycopene in the Non-Carotenoid-Producing Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 80, 1660–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Gao, S.; Tong, Y.; Zhu, L.; Ge, M.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, D.; Yang, S. Production of β-carotene by expressing a heterologous multifunctional carotene synthase in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Lett. 2017, 39, 921–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tramontin, L.R.R.; Kildegaard, K.R.; Sudarsan, S.; Borodina, I. Enhancement of Astaxanthin Biosynthesis in Oleaginous Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica via Microalgal Pathway. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Zhang, X.-K.; Wang, D.-N.; Chen, J.; Liu, Z.-J.; Wei, L.-J.; Hua, Q. Metabolic engineering of β-carotene biosynthesis in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Lett. 2020, 42, 945–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Abghari, A.; Chen, S. Yarrowia lipolytica as an Oleaginous Cell Factory Platform for Production of Fatty Acid-Based Biofuel and Bioproducts. Front. Energy Res. 2014, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 09 01068 g001 550
Figure 1. The sequestration of lutein in photosynthetic organisms. PS: photosystems. UV: ultraviolet light. ROS: reactive oxygen species. CCD: carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases.
Figure 1. The sequestration of lutein in photosynthetic organisms. PS: photosystems. UV: ultraviolet light. ROS: reactive oxygen species. CCD: carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases.
Microorganisms 09 01068 g001
Table
Table 1. Lutein content and productivity of microalgae strains under desirable cultivation conditions.
Table 1. Lutein content and productivity of microalgae strains under desirable cultivation conditions.
Microalgal StrainsLutein Content (mg/g)Lutein Productivity (mg/L/d)References
C. sorokiniana FZU609.5711.57[20]
Parachlorella sp. JD-07611.825[22]
Desmodesmus sp. F515.565.22[23]
Scenedesmus obliquus FSP-34.524.15[17]
C. sorokiniana MB-15.862.39[24]
Table
Table 2. Examples of mutagenesis and metabolic engineering strategies for altering lutein content in microalgae strains.
Table 2. Examples of mutagenesis and metabolic engineering strategies for altering lutein content in microalgae strains.
Microalgal StrainsStrategyLutein Yield (mg/g)References
C. sorokiniana MB-1-M12Random mutagenesis7.52[24]
C. sorokiniana mutant DMR-5&8Random mutagenesis7.0[16]
C.zofingiensis mutant CZ-bkt1Dysfunction of BKT1 by chemical mutation13.81[28]
Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiOverexpressing PSY gene from Dunaliella salina2.2-fold increase of lutein content[29]
C. reinhardtiiOverexpressing PSY gene from C. zofingiensis2.2-fold increase of lutein content[30]
C. zofingiensisOverexpressing PDS geneTotal carotenoid content increased by 32.1%[31]
C. reinhardtiiOverexpressing OR gene from A. thaliana1.9-fold increase of lutein content[32]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, Y.; Xiong, X.; Chen, S. Challenges and Potential in Increasing Lutein Content in Microalgae. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051068

AMA Style

Xie Y, Xiong X, Chen S. Challenges and Potential in Increasing Lutein Content in Microalgae. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(5):1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Yuxiao, Xiaochao Xiong, and Shulin Chen. 2021. "Challenges and Potential in Increasing Lutein Content in Microalgae" Microorganisms 9, no. 5: 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051068

APA Style

Xie, Y., Xiong, X., & Chen, S. (2021). Challenges and Potential in Increasing Lutein Content in Microalgae. Microorganisms, 9(5), 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9051068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop