Next Article in Journal
Comparative Nutritional and Histological Analysis of Malabar Red Snapper (Lutjanus malabaricus) and Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer)
Previous Article in Journal
Lactobacillus delbrueckii Ameliorated Blood Lipids via Intestinal Microbiota Modulation and Fecal Bile Acid Excretion in a Ningxiang Pig Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Coloration in Equine: Overview of Candidate Genes Associated with Coat Color Phenotypes

Liaocheng Research Institute of Donkey High-Efficiency Breeding and Ecological Feeding, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 522000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(12), 1802; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121802
Submission received: 9 May 2024 / Revised: 12 June 2024 / Accepted: 13 June 2024 / Published: 17 June 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Color and body size traits are considered the key parameters influence the economic value of animals. In recent years, advancement in the genetic basis of coat colors in equines has received considerable attention among animal breeders. In addition, coat color plays a significant role in breed identification and selection, as well as animal health and disease. The current review concisely provides information on the role of melanin pigments and key candidate genes associated with coat color phenotypes in equines. Furthermore, the review also highlights the importance of coat color in equine breeding and health.

Abstract

Variation in coat color among equids has attracted significant interest in genetics and breeding research. The range of colors is primarily determined by the type, concentration, and distribution of melanin pigments, with the balance between eumelanin and pheomelanin influenced by numerous genetic factors. Advances in genomic and sequencing technologies have enabled the identification of several candidate genes that influence coat color, thereby clarifying the genetic basis of these diverse phenotypes. In this review, we concisely categorize coat coloration in horses and donkeys, focusing on the biosynthesis and types of melanin involved in pigmentation. Moreover, we highlight the regulatory roles of some key candidate genes, such as MC1R, TYR, MITF, ASIP, and KIT, in coat color variation. Moreover, the review explores how coat color relates to selective breeding and specific equine diseases, offering valuable insights for developing breeding strategies that enhance both the esthetic and health aspects of equine species.

1. Introduction

Historically, horses and donkeys played a crucial role in facilitating inter-regional trade, as they were utilized for transportation and labor [1,2,3]. China’s horse industry has experienced significant growth due to the nation’s rapid socio-economic advancements and improved living standards. As a result, equestrian sports have gained widespread popularity as a recreational pursuit throughout the country. At the same time, the donkey industry has emerged as a significant source of income for farmers and herdsmen, driven by the increasing demand for donkey-derived products such as meat, milk, colla corii asini, and various specialty items.
Horses and donkeys were domesticated around 6000 years ago [4,5,6]. The domestication process is believed to have been complex and multi-staged, resulting in changes in the movement, morphology, and physiology of these animals compared to their wild ancestors [7,8,9]. One of the prominent features reflecting these changes is coat color. Prior to domestication, wild populations exhibited fewer variations in coat color. Different coat colors may have played roles in activities such as camouflage, mating behavior, and predation [10,11], which influenced survival and reproductive success. However, through natural adaptation and human-mediated selective breeding, there has been a gradual diversification of coat color phenotypes. Therefore, to fully understand a specific breed, it is necessary to understand the genetic basis underlying its coat coloration.
Coat color is a visually recognizable phenotypic trait that follows Mendelian laws of inheritance [12,13]. It has attracted widespread attention from scholars worldwide and has become a research focus in the field of genomics. As living standards rise, rare colors become more desirable, especially for ornamental or companion animals [14,15]. Coat color also plays a significant role in the purchasing decisions of buyers, with biases against certain colors influencing the selling price of the animal [16,17]. Identifying horse breeds and breed registration often rely on coat color as a crucial factor. Certain criteria and limitations must be met for horses to be registered, such as the American Paint horse, Appaloosa horse, and Pura Raza Español (PRE) horse [18].
Coat color is also a significant factor in breed selection. Researchers have used gene editing techniques to develop Duroc pigs with black coats, aiming to create superior breeds with high growth rates, high meat production, and coat color preferences of consumers [19]. Understanding the genetic mechanisms behind coat color diversity is crucial for assessing breeding germplasm resources. Previous studies have investigated the molecular basis of coat color traits in breeding animals. They used methods such as genetic variation analysis and differential gene expression analysis to study coat color genes associated with different coat color phenotypes within the same species [20,21]. Coat color can provide insights into an animal’s health and disease status, as genetic variations controlling coat color can be associated with various diseases. Previous research has connected coat color with conditions such as deafness, eye disease, albinism, melanoma, and other ailments in animals [22,23,24,25,26,27]. In recent years, progress has been made in studying the genetic markers associated with coat color in various livestock animals. Table 1 summarizes the genes associated with coat color phenotypes in animals.
The intersection of two important trends, the significance of coat color markers in livestock selection and the advancement of genomics technologies, necessitates a comprehensive review of current research on coat color traits. Therefore, this review paper aims to clarify the value and biological implications of genetic regulation mechanisms for coat color, with a specific focus on its relevance to disease and potential in selective breeding. In particular, it examines the expression mechanisms of major candidate genes for coat color in horses and donkeys. Additionally, it evaluates the regulatory mechanisms of genes involved in coat color control within biological pathways and investigates the relationship between coat color and the health of horses and donkeys. By doing so, it aims to contribute to our understanding of equids and establish a scientific basis for future endeavors in selective breeding.

2. Coat Color Classification in Equines

2.1. Coat Color Classification in Horses

Horses exhibit a variety of coat colors that can be classified using different criteria. Consistently, Lauvergne et al. [47] proposed four dimensions for describing horse coat color. These dimensions include pigmentary pattern, eumelanic type, pigmentation alteration, and white designs, covering the entire range of variability. Furthermore, in Equine Color Genetics, 4th Edition, Sponenberg et al. [48] describes the fundamental colors of horses (bay, chestnut, black, and brown) and then explains dilutions and white patterning based on the genetic foundations of these underlying coat colors. Similarly, Thiruvenkadan et al. [49] classified horse coat colors into three categories: basic colors (black, bay, and chestnut), diluted colors (cream, dun, silver dapple, and champagne), and white base colors (determined by the presence of white coat mixtures such as gray, pinto, and white) or white patches.
(1)
Black: The entire coat is primarily black.
(2)
Bay: The coat is brown with black points and shades.
(3)
Chestnut: The coat color is varying shades of red and have non-black points.
(4)
Diluted colors: The coat color becomes lighter and sometimes nearly white.
(5)
White spotting: The patterns of white spotting are added independently to any colored coat.

2.2. Coat Color Classification in Donkey

In comparison to horses, donkeys have less variation in coat color and can be divided into the following main categories [48]:
(1)
Black: The entire coat is primarily black.
(2)
Sanfen: The entire coat is black, with white fur around the mouth, eyes, and underbelly.
(3)
Gray: The coat is predominantly greenish-gray, greenish-brown, or greenish-white, with lighter coloring on the belly and nose. The long hairs are black or nearly black.
(4)
Cyan: Mixed black and white hairs cover the body, and the number of white hairs increases with age.
(5)
Chestnut: The coat is mostly red all over the body, with lighter, almost white coloring around the mouth, nose, eyes, underbelly, and inside the limbs.
(6)
White: The entire coat is white or light gray.

3. Mechanisms of Pigmentation

The formation of hair color is determined by the structure of the hair follicle, which is a complex skin appendage resulting from the interaction of the epidermis and dermis [50,51]. The hair follicle consists of various cells, including melanocytes, Merkel cells, and Langerhans cells, each serving different functions such as pigmentation, induction, and immune response [52,53]. What sets the hair follicle apart is its cyclic growth, which involves rapid growth (anagen), apoptosis-driven regression (catagen), and a quiescence phase (telogen) [50,51,52,53].
The variety of coat colors in animals is influenced by multiple factors. Different species show different coat colors, and even within the same species, there is a significant range of coat colors. Mammalian coat color variation is affected by the type, distribution, and content of melanin [54,55]. Melanin is produced by melanocytes (MCs), which derive from melanocyte stem cells (McSCs) originating from the neural crest. These cells are located in the bulge of the hair follicle alongside hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs). During the anagen phase, both HFSCs and McSCs are activated. HFSCs generate new hair follicles, while McSCs migrate to the bulb and differentiate to produce MCs, which, in turn, produce melanin and color the hair [56,57]. In the catagen phase, MCs undergo apoptosis, leading to a cessation of melanin synthesis in the hair [52,58]. During the telogen phase, both HFSCs and McSCs remain relatively inactive, awaiting the next hair cycle [58,59].
Melanin can be classified into two types: eumelanin, which comprises brown to black particles, and pheomelanin, which comprises yellowish to slightly reddish particles [60,61,62]. The ratio of these two types determines the hair color differentiation. The melanin synthesis pathway is depicted in Figure 1. Notably, α-MSH binds to MC1R, activating adenylate cyclase (AC). This activation leads to an increase in intracellular cAMP levels and subsequent tyrosinase activation [63]. Tyrosinase, in turn, catalyzes the conversion of tyrosine to dopa, which is further oxidized to dopaquinone. Dopaquinone serves as a precursor for both true melanin and fucoxanthin synthesis. In the presence of cysteine, dopaquinone reacts to form fucoxanthin. Conversely, in the absence of cysteine, dopaquinone undergoes intramolecular cyclization, generating cyclodopa, which then leads to the formation of dopa pigment. The decomposition products of dopa pigment are oxidized to produce eumelanin [21,64,65,66]. Additionally, the regulation of melanin levels is influenced by the tyrosine family, which includes tyrosinase (TYR), tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TYRP 1), and tyrosinase-related protein-2 (TYRP 2), also known as dopachrome tautomerase (DCT) [67,68].

4. Candidate Genes Associated with Coat Color Phenotypes

In recent years, extensive research has been conducted by scholars both domestically and internationally on the genetics of equine coat color, resulting in significant progress. The formation of the majority of coat colors can be reasonably explained, with reported genes including MC1R, ASIP, TYR, MITF, KIT, EDNRB, STX17, MATP, and PMEL17. Furthermore, these genes have been extensively documented for their critical role in coat colors in horses and donkeys. Using DAVID analysis, it was revealed that these genes are significantly involved in regulation of the melanogenesis signaling pathway, which has a critical role in the synthesis of melanin pigments (eai04916), as shown in Figure 2.

4.1. Candidate Genes Associated with Coat Color Phenotypes in Horses

4.1.1. MC1R and ASIP

The primary horse coat colors are black, chestnut, and bay, with their expression largely influenced by two key coat color candidate genes, MC1R and ASIP [69,70]. The correlation between their alleles and resulting phenotypes is illustrated in Table 2. Additionally, Reissmann et al. [71] observed that these three fundamental coat colors were prevalent across nearly all horse breeds, as evidenced by their analysis of coat color alleles in 1093 horses from 55 different breeds and 20 Przewalski’s wild horses. Furthermore, Mura et al. [72] discovered that the predominant coat colors were black, chestnut, and bay, with no presence of spotting or color dilution by analyzing the genetic distribution of coat color in 90 Sarcidano horses.
MC1R is a G-protein-coupled receptor expressed in the skin and melanocytes [73]. The MC1R gene, located on equine chromosome 3, consists of exons that are 954 bp long [69]. When MC1R has the dominant allele (EE = E), it promotes the production of true melanin, resulting in a black coat color. Conversely, a mutated MC1R gene that produces a recessive allele (Ee = e) promotes the production of fucoxanthin, leading to a chestnut coat color [69,70]. For example, Marklund et al. [28] identified a missense mutation (TCC-TTC) in the MC1R gene, causing codon 83 to change from serine to phenylalanine, ultimately resulting in the chestnut phenotype. The ASIP gene is located on horse chromosome 22. In the case of ASIP, the dominant allele (AA = A) encodes a protein that competes with α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) for binding to MC1R. This competition inhibits the production of eumelanin, and instead promotes the synthesis of pheomelanin [69,74,75]. Accordingly, Rieder et al. [30] discovered an 11 bp deletion in exon 2 of ASIP, leading to a recessive allele (Aa = a) that is unable to code for the proteins necessary for eumelanin synthesis, thus being associated with recessive black coat color in horses. However, subsequent to the availability of the EquCab3.0 sequence, it was proposed that the mutation actually occurred in exon 3 [69]. Furthermore, Wagner et al. [76] identified a novel allele, ea, with a mutation at codon 84 (GAC-AAC), resulting in a change from aspartic acid to asparagine. The phenotype of chestnut hairs resulting from this mutation closely resembles the general chestnut hair phenotype, with variations in shade based on different combinations of (e/e), (e/ea), and (ea/ea) genotypes. There is also speculation that intergenic regulatory variation may enhance ASIP gene expression, leading to a redder coat color and a brighter bay appearance in horses [77].

4.1.2. KIT

The proto-oncogene c-kit is located on chromosome 3 in horses and affects the survival, migration, and differentiation of melanocytes. It is a major candidate gene for the formation of white coat color [78,79,80]. Previous studies have shown that four white coat color traits, Dominant White, Tobiano, Sabino, and Roan, are associated with the KIT gene, as depicted in Table 3.
Patterson et al. [81] identified a new mutation, W34, that is significantly associated with white markings in 147 horses. This mutation involves replacing a polar threonine encoded by the KIT gene with a nonpolar alanine. Additionally, this variant interacts with W19. Interestingly, McFadden et al. [82] clarified that the W35 allele is caused by a single nucleotide mutation in the 5′ untranslated region. Having at least one copy of this allele can affect the migration of melanocytes, resulting in an increase in white spots on the coat. Furthermore, Hug et al. [83] detected a heterozygous 1273 bp deletion that spans parts of intron 2 and exon 3 of the KIT gene in the whole-genome sequence data of the German Riding Pony, defining this mutation as W28. Similarly, Patterson et al. [84] identified and confirmed two variants in the white spotted horse family. The first variant, W31, is a leucine to tyrosine shifter mutation in exon 1 of the KIT gene, leading to an early termination codon and shortening of the normal amino acid sequence. The second variant is a mild white spotting pattern caused by the W32 non-synonymous SNP. Consequently, Brooks et al. [85] discovered that the C to G base substitution in intron 13 of the KIT gene does not directly cause the Tobiano coat color. However, the association between Tobiano and this polymorphism in the KIT gene provides further evidence for KIT as a potential gene related to Tobiano coat color. Subsequent research revealed that the Tobiano coat color is actually the result of a paracentric inversion of horse chromosome 3, although this inversion does not directly affect the structure of the KIT gene. This finding may help explain the appearance of the cryptic Tobiano phenotype [36,86]. Similarly, Brooks et al. [80] identified a single nucleotide polymorphism resulting from a T and A base substitution in intron 16 and a subsequent deletion in exon 17, leading to the formation of Sabino 1 (SB1). However, this specific polymorphism cannot fully account for the various Sabino types observed. In a study by Voß et al. [87], the exons of the KIT gene were sequenced in Roan and non-Roan Icelandic horses, revealing eight variants significantly correlated with heterozygous coloration. Of note, the insertion in intron 13 (ECA 3: 79, 548, 356) showed the strongest association (p-value = 0.0002), suggesting a potential relationship between the KIT gene and the Roan coat color phenotype in Icelandic horses.

4.1.3. Diluted Genes and Their Association with Coat Colors

The SLC45A2 gene, located on chromosome 21 in horses [88], encodes a transmembrane protein in melanocytes that plays a role in transporting molecules necessary for the proper functioning of melanosomes [42]. Mutations in this gene can lead to a dilution phenotype in coat color. Correspondingly, Holl et al. [43] identified the missense variant SLC45A2: c.985G>A as responsible for the pearly coat color allele Cprl, while a new allele (Csun) was linked to the missense variant SLC45A2: c.568G>A, resulting in coat color pigmentation dilution. In a recent study, Sevane et al. [89] found that a polymorphism c.985G>A in exon 4 of SLC45A2 was significantly associated with the pearl/cream phenotype, suggesting that selecting for the Cprl gene could produce pearl hair color phenotypes. Correspondingly, Bisbee et al. [42] discovered that the variant c.305G>A in SLC45A2 was only present in purebred mares among 15 Gypsy horses, leading to a dilution phenotype named snowdrop (Csno). This dilution phenotype is similar to cream dilution, and possibly has no effect on heterozygotes.
The Dun phenotype is identified by its lightened coat color and dark markings [45]. Imsland et al. [45] revealed that the Dun phenotype is linked to the normal expression of TBX3 on equine chromosome 8, and that a 1617 bp deletion mutation in the TBX3 gene leads to a non-dun coat color. Additionally, another study indicated that the TBX3 1.6 kb insertion–deletion in the haploid plays a significant role in determining the degree of dilution in the phenotype [90].
Silver dapple is a result of melanin dilution, particularly in the long hairs of the mane and tail, leading to white and gray coloring [46]. Correspondingly, Brunberg et al. [46] identified a significant genetic linkage between the PMEL17 gene on equine chromosome 6 and the silver phenotype in horses. They pinpointed a missense mutation in exon 11 and intron 9 of the PMEL17 gene as the cause of the silvery coat color. Furthermore, Reissmann et al. [34] suggested that the SILV gene may also play a role in the silver coat color of horses. By sequencing the SILV gene in 24 horses, they discovered two SNPs (g.697A>T, g.1457C>T) that were strongly associated with the silver phenotype. Notably, Cook et al. [44] reported, for the first time, that a missense mutation (c.188C>G) in exon 2 of the SLC36A1 gene on equine chromosome 14 is the causative factor for the champagne phenotype in horses. Their findings were supported by experimental evidence showing the presence of the variant in 85 horses with the champagne-diluted phenotype and its absence in 97 horses lacking the champagne phenotype.

4.1.4. Other Genes

Horses with the gray phenotypic mutation experience a gradual whitening of their hair as they age. In line with this, Rosengren et al. [41] identified a 4.6 kb duplication in intron 6 of the STX17 gene on equine chromosome 25 as the cause of this mutation within a 352 kb region. Similarly, Carl-Johan et al. [91] revealed that the graying locus dosage affects the speed at which Lipizzan horses gray. Specifically, horses with a G1/G1 genotype do not gray, G1/G2 genotype gray slowly, G1/G3 genotype gray quickly, and G3/G3 genotype gray very quickly. In contrast to previous studies linking the gray phenotype to STX17 intron duplication, Nowacka-Woszuk et al. [92] conducted a copy number analysis using droplet digital PCR and found that tested individuals had either six or four copies (gray) or two copies (non-gray) of the STX17 gene fragment.
The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is located on chromosome 16 in horses, and it affects melanocyte differentiation, leading to decreased pigmentation when the gene is mutated [93]. Table 4 summarizes the alleles and their phenotypes resulting from mutations in the MITF gene.
Hauswirth et al. [35] discovered two polymorphisms, SW1 and SW3, in the MITF gene that cause white patterning in a family of quarter horses. SW1 is caused by a 10 bp insertion in the melanocyte-specific promoter, while SW3 is due to a small deletion in exon 5. Another study identified two copy number variants of the MITF gene linked to the blotchy white depigmentation phenotype in American paint horses. This discovery was made both before and after Henkel et al. [94] reported a heterozygous 63 kb deletion spanning exons 6–9 of the MITF gene. In addition, Magdesian et al. [95] identified an 8.7 kb deletion in the 3′UTR, which includes the seventh intron to the ninth exon of the MITF gene. Furthermore, Patterson et al. [96] used exome sequencing to detect a three-base pair deletion leading to the loss of arginine, designating the mutant allele as SW7 according to the nomenclature of the MITF gene mutation responsible for white spotting. Subsequently, Bellone et al. [97] used whole-genome sequencing in combination with a candidate gene approach to pinpoint a 2.3 kb structural variant known as SW8, which is responsible for Splashed white in horses. Splashed white is characterized by extensive white patches on the legs, abdomen, and face. A previous study meticulously described a missense mutation in the MITF-binding structural domain linked to the Splashed white phenotype in Pura Raza Española horses. The mutant allele was named SW9 [98].

4.2. Candidate Genes Associated with Coat Color Phenotypes in Donkey

Compared to the wide range of coat colors seen in horses, donkeys exhibit fewer coat color options, and limited research has been conducted on their coat color candidate genes. Previous studies have primarily examined three genes: MC1R, ASIP, and KIT. Abitbol et al. [29] conducted a study screening four red donkeys and two bay-colored donkeys for functional variants of the MC1R gene. They discovered that a recessive missense c.629T>C variant was consistently linked to the inheritance of the red coat color. This finding was further confirmed when genotyping 124 donkeys, and it was found that the variant was strongly associated with the inheritance of the red coat color trait. Subsequent analysis of the ASIP gene in 127 donkeys from six breeds revealed a single nucleotide polymorphism (c.349T>C) in black donkeys. This polymorphism led to the substitution of the 117th amino acid, cysteine, with arginine, resulting in the black coat color trait. It was found to be recessively inherited [31]. Similarly, in a recent study by Sun et al. [32], 590 individuals across 13 donkey breeds were genotyped to identify polymorphisms in the ASIP gene. They discovered that the c.349T>C mutation could distinguish between pure black donkeys and non-black donkeys, aiding in breeding selection for pure black donkeys. Furthermore, Haase et al. [40] identified a missense mutation in exon 4 of the KIT gene (c.662A>C) in white donkeys, which was not present in their control group (solid colored and white spotted). This mutation led to the substitution of tyrosine for serine. A splicing mutation (c.1978+2T>A) was also found, which is present only in white spotted donkeys. Moreover, Wang et al. [6] compared 25 Dun donkeys with dilute gray pigmentation to 23 samples with non-dilute black or chestnut coat color. They determined that a 1 bp deletion downstream of the TBX3 gene was responsible for the difference in coat color phenotype, increasing pigmentation in non-Dun donkeys and suggesting a change in coat color during the domestication of wild donkeys into domestic donkeys. A study performed by Utzeri et al. [33] discovered an association between albinism in Asinara white donkeys and a specific missense mutation (c.604C>G; p. His202Asp) in the TYR gene. Subsequently, genotyping was conducted on 17 wild Asinara white albino donkeys and 8 colored breeds or populations, totaling 65 donkeys. The results confirmed that only the Asinara albino donkeys exhibited the genotype homozygous for the mutation G/G, while the other colored donkeys had genotypes C/C or C/G.

5. Coat Color Genetic Applications

5.1. Coat Color Genetic Applications in Breeding

Coat color is crucial for identifying equine breeds and individuals, as it is a key factor in registration and census records. In equine genetic breeding, researchers and breeders prioritize the assessment of desirable traits. While coat color is a visible morphological marker, which also serves as a genetic marker. However, factors such as age, environment, and diet can complicate the accurate visual identification of coat color. Mura et al. [72] conducted a genetic analysis of the coat colors of 90 Sarcidano horses, revealing discrepancies between phenotypic and genetic data, with an error rate reaching as high as 53.4%. Similarly, Nowacka-Woszuk et al. [94] genotyped a Connemara foal as non-gray, while the official record classified it as gray. Through analyzing various documents, they discovered that the foal’s true coat color was blue and had been misclassified. In a separate study, Kim et al. [99] examined the genetic makeup of 1462 Jeju horses to understand the genes influencing coat color. They observed no significant variations in the MC1R and ASIP genes across generations, but noted significant changes over time in the TO allele and STX17 G allele associated with Tobiano coat patterns. These findings highlight the importance of analyzing coat color genes during stallion selection and emphasize the need for genetic testing before breeding. By conducting genotyping for coat color traits, breeders can make informed decisions, ensuring accurate breed registration and facilitating the selection of individuals with desired coat color characteristics. As living standards improve and the modern horse industry develops, there is growing diversification in consumer demand, particularly in the esthetics of horse coat colors. This is especially evident in competitive equestrianism and the breeding of ornamental horses, where individuals seek horses with varied coat colors and elegant temperaments. Colla corii asini, a solid gum derived from donkey skin through decoction and concentration, holds high nutritional value and is a prized traditional Chinese medicine [100]. The finest donkey skin for this purpose is sourced from the Dezhou Wutou donkey [101]. Therefore, the selection and breeding of equine animals for specific coat colors play a crucial role in enhancing economic efficiency. In comparison to donkeys, horses possess a greater number of hair color loci, many of which exhibit a significant number of compound alleles. This complexity makes consistently producing a specific hair color through selective breeding challenging in practical breeding programs, highlighting the need for further research in this area.

5.2. Coat Color Genetic Applications in Diseases

5.2.1. Vitiligo and Melanoma

Vitiligo-like depigmentation and melanoma are common skin conditions observed in gray horses as they age, with a prevalence of up to 80% in horses aged 15 years or older [102]. Vitiligo is caused by the loss of melanocytes in the skin, resulting in white patches among areas of hyperpigmentation [103]. On the other hand, melanomas typically appear as firm black nodules and tend to develop in regions such as the tail root, anus, genitals, and periocular areas. It is worth noting that a study by Rosengren et al. [41] demonstrated a connection between the gray phenotype in horses, associated diseases, and a 4.6 kb repeat within intron 6 of the STX17 gene. This repeat functions as a cis-acting regulatory mutation, causing an overexpression of STX17 and the nearby NR4A3 gene in gray horse melanoma. Moreover, gray horses with ASIP loss-of-function mutations exhibit increased melanocortin-1 receptor signaling, resulting in a higher risk of developing melanoma. In addition, a recent study has presented compelling evidence that the DPF3 gene plays a role in melanoma development. Through a genome-wide association study (GWAS) involving 1210 horses from seven breeds, this gene has been identified as crucial in gray horses who manage a high heritable tumor load associated with melanoma [104].

5.2.2. Health Risks

The white phenotype of horses has a significant influence on human culture, leaving a lasting impact on global literature and art [41]. The striking and unique white coat color, along with its high economic value, sets white horses apart from other color variations. However, the white phenotype is often associated with various health issues such as embryonic lethality, deafness, and blindness [36]. Consistently, Pulos and Hutt [105] observed a ratio of 28:15 in the offspring of four heterozygous white stallions mated with white mares, which closely aligns with the expected 2:1 ratio. This suggests that the WW genotype may be lethal during early development. A previous report conducted by Esdaile et al. [106] identified a genotype frequency of 0.0063 for the W13 allele in American Miniature horses. However, this allele was not detected in Shetland ponies, and no pure W13 purities were found. The researchers speculated that the W13 gene, responsible for the white phenotype, may be lethal in its pure form. In a separate study, Magdesian et al. [107] observed that 14 deaf American Paint horses exhibited extensive white markings on the head and limbs. Interestingly, the amount of white on the neck and trunk varied among these horses. The researchers suggested that horses with extensive head and limb markings, as well as blue eyes, were more likely to be deaf. Correspondingly, Bellone et al. [99] identified a 2.3 kb structural variant in the MITF gene in a Splashed white Thoroughbred stallion. Deafness was confirmed in one of his offspring, an almost all-white foal, based on BAER test results. The leopard complex spotting (LP) phenotype is attributed to a mutation in TRPM1 that significantly impairs the normal function of TRPM1, consequently impacting the pigmentation and hearing problems of horses [36]. Additionally, Sandmeyer et al. [108] and Rockwell et al. [109] both noted that Appaloosa horses with the LP phenotype, characterized by depigmentation with pigmented patches, are more prone to equine recurrent uveitis (ERU) compared to other breeds. ERU is a common ocular disease that presents as an inflammatory condition in the eye. Recurrent episodes of ERU can result in complications such as cataracts, intraocular adhesions, corneal ulcers, and ultimately, blindness [110]. Moreover, donkeys with the white phenotype, such as Asinara donkeys with albinism and white coat coloration, have a white coat and skin with varying degrees of reduced pigmentation in the eyes, which can range from pink to light blue. Asinara donkeys with albinism also experience diminished vision and exhibit avoidance behavior when exposed to sunlight, as their skin becomes flushed, dry, and damaged [111].

6. Conclusions

The rapid development of genomics and sequencing technologies has provided a solid foundation for identifying and studying genes and mutation loci that are associated with coat color in equines. Coat color plays a crucial role in registering and distinguishing equine breeds, and it can also help in identifying diseases that are linked to specific coat colors. Additionally, the demand for unique coat colors in ornamental and competitive horses, as well as the need for donkey skin for colla corii asini production, highlights the significance of these traits in equines. Therefore, genetic research on coat color in horses and donkeys is both theoretically important and economically valuable. Numerous studies have extensively investigated the genetic basis of coat color in these animals, revealing insights into the mechanisms of coat color formation and its correlation with specific diseases. Researchers worldwide have sought to explore the potential significance of coat color phenotypes as indicators in equine breeding. Consequently, coat color phenotyping is expected to be a valuable tool for refining breeding selection and predicting diseases in horses and donkeys. Moving forward, further research on coat color genes in equines is expected to provide a more precise and scientific foundation for equid breeding, genetic diversity, disease identification, and treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—original draft, project administration: M.Z.K. and C.W.; Formal analysis and interpretation, Software: M.Z.K. and X.L.; Data curation, Validation, Writing—review and editing: M.Z.K., X.L., Y.P., X.Z., X.W., W.C., X.K., H.L., W.R. and C.W.; Resources and Funding: C.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2022YFD1600103), The Shandong Province Modern Agricultural Technology System Donkey Industrial Innovation Team (grant no. SDAIT-27), Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry Project of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (grant number 19211162), The National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31671287), The Open Project of Liaocheng University Animal Husbandry Discipline (grant no. 319312101-14), The Open Project of Shan-dong Collaborative Innovation Center for Donkey Industry Technology (grant no. 3193308), Research on Donkey Pregnancy Improvement (grant no. K20LC0901), and Liaocheng University scientific research fund (grant no. 318052025).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data are available in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rodrigues, J.B.; Raw, Z.; Santurtun, E.; Cooke, F.; Clancy, C. Donkeys in transition: Changing use in a changing world. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 2021, 58, e174325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raudsepp, T.; Finno, C.J.; Bellone, R.R.; Petersen, J.L. Ten years of the horse reference genome: Insights into equine biology, domestication and population dynamics in the post-genome era. Anim. Genet. 2019, 50, 569–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Orlando, L.; Librado, P. Origin and Evolution of Deleterious Mutations in Horses. Genes 2019, 10, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Togtokh, M.; Haige, H.; Ruoyang, Z.; Tugeqin, B.; Manglai, D.; Bai, D. The origins and genetic characteristics of domestic horses. Biodivers. Sci. 2020, 28, 734–748. [Google Scholar]
  5. Camillo, F.; Rota, A.; Biagini, L.; Tesi, M.; Fanelli, D.; Panzani, D. The Current Situation and Trend of Donkey Industry in Europe. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2018, 65, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, C.; Li, H.; Guo, Y.; Huang, J.; Sun, Y.; Min, J.; Wang, J.; Fang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, S.; et al. Donkey genomes provide new insights into domestication and selection for coat color. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmad, H.I.; Ahmad, M.J.; Jabbir, F.; Ahmar, S.; Ahmad, N.; Elokil, A.A.; Chen, J. The Domestication Makeup: Evolution, Survival, and Challenges. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 8, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hansen Wheat, C.; van der Bijl, W.; Wheat, C.W. Morphology does not covary with predicted behavioral correlations of the domestication syndrome in dogs. Evol. Lett. 2020, 4, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jensen, P. Domestication—From behaviour to genes and back again. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006, 97, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oli, M.K.; Kenney, A.J.; Boonstra, R.; Boutin, S.; Murray, D.L.; Peers, M.J.L.; Gilbert, B.S.; Jung, T.S.; Chaudhary, V.; Hines, J.E.; et al. Does coat colour influence survival? A test in a cyclic population of snowshoe hares. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2023, 290, 20221421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kennah, J.L.; Peers, M.J.L.; Vander Wal, E.; Majchrzak, Y.N.; Menzies, A.K.; Studd, E.K.; Boonstra, R.; Humphries, M.M.; Jung, T.S.; Kenney, A.J.; et al. Coat color mismatch improves survival of a keystone boreal herbivore: Energetic advantages exceed lost camouflage. Ecology 2023, 104, e3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Thapa, P.C.; Do, D.N.; Manafiazar, G.; Miar, Y. Coat color inheritance in American mink. BMC Genom. 2023, 24, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brancalion, L.; Haase, B.; Wade, C.M. Canine coat pigmentation genetics: A review. Anim. Genet. 2022, 53, 3–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, B.; He, X.; Zhao, Y.; Unierhu; Bai, D.; Manglai, D. Tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1) gene polymorphism and skin differential expression related to coat color in Mongolian horse. Livest. Sci. 2014, 167, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dugatkin, L.A. The silver fox domestication experiment. Evol. Educ. Outreach 2018, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Terfa, Z.G.; Haile, A.; Baker, D.; Kassie, G.T. Valuation of traits of indigenous sheep using hedonic pricing in Central Ethiopia. Agric. Food Econ. 2013, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kassie, G.T.; Abdulai, A.; Wollny, C. Heteroscedastic hedonic price model for cattle in the rural markets of central Ethiopia. Appl. Econ. 2011, 43, 3459–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sánchez-Guerrero, M.J.; Negro-Rama, S.; Demyda-Peyras, S.; Solé-Berga, M.; Azor-Ortiz, P.J.; Valera-Córdoba, M. Morphological and genetic diversity of Pura Raza Español horse with regard to the coat colour. Anim. Sci. J. 2019, 90, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhong, H.; Zhang, J.; Tan, C.; Shi, J.; Yang, J.; Cai, G.; Wu, Z.; Yang, H. Pig Coat Color Manipulation by MC1R Gene Editing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jia, X.; Ding, P.; Chen, S.; Zhao, S.; Wang, J.; Lai, S. Analysis of MC1R, MITF, TYR, TYRP1, and MLPH Genes Polymorphism in Four Rabbit Breeds with Different Coat Colors. Animals 2021, 11, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yao, L.; Bao, A.; Hong, W.; Hou, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liang, X.; Aniwashi, J. Transcriptome profiling analysis reveals key genes of different coat color in sheep skin. PeerJ 2019, 7, e8077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fernández, A.; Hayashi, M.; Garrido, G.; Montero, A.; Guardia, A.; Suzuki, T.; Montoliu, L. Genetics of non-syndromic and syndromic oculocutaneous albinism in human and mouse. Pigment. Cell Melanoma Res. 2021, 34, 786–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Philipp, U.; Lupp, B.; Mömke, S.; Stein, V.; Tipold, A.; Eule, J.C.; Rehage, J.; Distl, O. A MITF Mutation Associated with a Dominant White Phenotype and Bilateral Deafness in German Fleckvieh Cattle. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dessinioti, C.; Stratigos, A.J.; Rigopoulos, D.; Katsambas, A.D. A review of genetic disorders of hypopigmentation: Lessons learned from the biology of melanocytes. Exp. Dermatol. 2009, 18, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Platt, S.; Freeman, J.; di Stefani, A.; Wieczorek, L.; Henley, W. Prevalence of Unilateral and Bilateral Deafness in Border Collies and Association with Phenotype. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2006, 20, 1355–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gauly, M.; Vaughan, J.; Hogreve, S.K.; Erhardt, G. Brainstem Auditory-Evoked Potential Assessment of Auditory Function and Congenital Deafness in Llamas (Lama glama) and Alpacas (L. pacos). J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2005, 19, 756–760. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jannot, A.; Meziani, R.; Bertrand, G.; Gérard, B.; Descamps, V.; Archimbaud, A.; Picard, C.; Ollivaud, L.; Basset-Seguin, N.; Kerob, D.; et al. Allele variations in the OCA2 gene (pink-eyed-dilution locus) are associated with genetic susceptibility to melanoma. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 13, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marklund, L.; Moller, M.J.; Sandberg, K.; Andersson, L. A missense mutation in the gene for melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor (MCIR) is associated with the chestnut coat color in horses. Mamm. Genome 1996, 7, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abitbol, M.; Legrand, R.; Tiret, L. A missense mutation in melanocortin 1 receptor is associated with the red coat colour in donkeys. Anim. Genet. 2014, 45, 878–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rieder, S.; Taourit, S.; Mariat, D.; Langlois, B.; Guérn, G. Mutations in the agouti (ASIP), the extension (MC1R), and the brown (TYRP1) loci and their association to coat color phenotypes in horses (Equus caballus). Mamm. Genome 2001, 12, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abitbol, M.; Legrand, R.; Tiret, L. A missense mutation in the agouti signaling protein gene (ASIP) is associated with the no light points coat phenotype in donkeys. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2015, 47, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, T.; Li, S.; Xia, X.; Ji, C.; Zhang, G.; Yu, J.; Jiang, G.; Dang, R.; Lei, C. ASIP gene variation in Chinese donkeys. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 372–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Utzeri, V.J.; Bertolini, F.; Ribani, A.; Schiavo, G.; Dall’Olio, S.; Fontanesi, L. The albinism of the feral Asinara white donkeys (Equus asinus) is determined by a missense mutation in a highly conserved position of the tyrosinase (TYR) gene deduced protein. Anim. Genet. 2016, 47, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Reissmann, M.; Bierwolf, J.; Brockmann, G.A. Two SNPs in the SILV gene are associated with silver coat colour in ponies. Anim. Genet. 2007, 38, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hauswirth, R.; Haase, B.; Blatter, M.; Brooks, S.A.; Burger, D.; Drögemüller, C.; Gerber, V.; Henke, D.; Janda, J.; Jude, R.; et al. Mutations in MITF and PAX3 Cause “Splashed White” and Other White Spotting Phenotypes in Horses. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. McFadden, A.; Vierra, M.; Martin, K.; Brooks, S.A.; Everts, R.E.; Lafayette, C. Spotting the Pattern: A Review on White Coat Color in the Domestic Horse. Animals 2024, 14, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pasternak, M.; Krupiński, J.; Gurgul, A.; Bugno-Poniewierska, M. Genetic, historical and breeding aspects of the occurrence of the tobiano pattern and white markings in the Polish population of Hucul horses—A review. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2020, 48, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Oyebanjo, M.O.; Obi, E.A.; Salako, A.E. Genes affecting coat colour and the resulting variation in horses (Equus caballus)—A Review. J. Anim. Sci. Vet. Med. 2022, 7, 127–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Grilz-Seger, G.; Reiter, S.; Neuditschko, M.; Wallner, B.; Rieder, S.; Leeb, T.; Jagannathan, V.; Mesarič, M.; Cotman, M.; Pausch, H.; et al. A Genome-Wide Association Analysis in Noriker Horses Identifies a SNP Associated with Roan Coat Color. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2020, 88, 102950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haase, B.; Rieder, S.; Leeb, T. Two variants in the KIT gene as candidate causative mutations for a dominant white and a white spotting phenotype in the donkey. Anim. Genet. 2015, 46, 321–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pielberg, G.R.; Golovko, A.; Sundström, E.; Curik, I.; Lennartsson, J.; Seltenhammer, M.H.; Druml, T.; Binns, M.; Fitzsimmons, C.; Lindgren, G.; et al. A cis-acting regulatory mutation causes premature hair graying and susceptibility to melanoma in the horse. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1004–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bisbee, D.; Carpenter, M.L.; Hofes-Martin, K.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. Identification of a novel missense variant in SLC45A2 associated with dilute snowdrop phenotype in Gypsy horses. Anim. Genet. 2020, 51, 342–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Holl, H.M.; Pflug, K.M.; Yates, K.M.; Hoefs-Martin, K.; Shepard, C.; Cook, D.G.; Lafayette, C.; Brooks, S.A. A candidate gene approach identifies variants in SLC45A2 that explain dilute phenotypes, pearl and sunshine, in compound heterozygote horses. Anim. Genet. 2019, 50, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cook, D.; Brooks, S.; Bellone, R.; Bailey, E. Missense Mutation in Exon 2 of SLC36A1 Responsible for Champagne Dilution in Horses. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Imsland, F.; McGowan, K.; Rubin, C.; Henegar, C.; Sundström, E.; Berglund, J.; Schwochow, D.; Gustafson, U.; Imsland, P.; Lindblad-Toh, K. Regulatory mutations in TBX3 disrupt asymmetric hair pigmentation that underlies Dun camouflage color in horses. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Brunberg, E.; Andersson, L.; Gothran, G.; Sandberg, K.; Mikko, S.; Lindgren, G. A missense mutation in PMEL17 is associated with the Silver coat color in horses. BMC Genet. 2006, 7, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lauvergne, J.J.; Silvestrelli, M.; Langlois, B.; Renieri, C.; Poirel, D.; Antaldi, G.G.V. A new scheme for describing horse coat colour. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1991, 27, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sponenberg, D.P.; Bellone, R. Equine Color Genetics, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  49. Thiruvenkadan, A.K.; Kandasamy, N.; Panneerselvam, S. Coat colour inheritance in horses. Livest. Sci. 2008, 117, 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lin, X.; Zhu, L.; He, J. Morphogenesis, Growth Cycle and Molecular Regulation of Hair Follicles. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 899095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ji, S.; Zhu, Z.; Sun, X.; Fu, X. Functional hair follicle regeneration: An updated review. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2021, 6, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wu, W.; Yang, J.; Tao, H.; Lei, M. Environmental Regulation of Skin Pigmentation and Hair Regeneration. Stem Cells Dev. 2022, 31, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Carrasco, E.; Soto-Heredero, G.; Mittelbrunn, M. The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Cutaneous Remodeling and Hair Follicle Dynamics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Arenas-Báez, P.; Torres-Hernández, G.; Castillo-Hernández, G.; Hernández-Rodríguez, M.; Sánchez-Gutiérrez, R.A.; Vargas-López, S.; González-Maldonado, J.; Domínguez-Martínez, P.A.; Granados-Rivera, L.A.; Maldonado-Jáquez, L.A. Coat Color in Local Goats: Influence on Environmental Adaptation and Productivity, and Use as a Selection Criterion. Biology 2023, 12, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hu, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, B.; Yang, N.; Chen, S.; Shen, J.; Bao, G.; Wu, X. KIT is involved in melanocyte proliferation, apoptosis and melanogenesis in the Rex Rabbit. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rachmin, I.; Lee, J.H.; Zhang, B.; Sefton, J.; Jung, I.; Lee, Y.I.; Hsu, Y.; Fisher, D.E. Stress-associated ectopic differentiation of melanocyte stem cells and ORS amelanotic melanocytes in an ex vivo human hair follicle model. Exp. Dermatol. 2021, 30, 578–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, B.; Ma, S.; Rachmin, I.; He, M.; Baral, P.; Choi, S.; Goncalves, W.A.; Shwartz, Y.; Fast, E.M.; Su, Y.; et al. Hyperactivation of sympathetic nerves drives depletion of melanocyte stem cells. Nature 2020, 577, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Qiu, W.; Chuong, C.; Lei, M. Regulation of melanocyte stem cells in the pigmentation of skin and its appendages: Biological patterning and therapeutic potentials. Exp. Dermatol. 2019, 28, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lee, S.; An, L.; Soloway, P.D.; White, A.C. Dynamic regulation of chromatin accessibility during melanocyte stem cell activation. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2023, 36, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Henkel, J.; Saif, R.; Jagannathan, V.; Schmocker, C.; Zeindler, F.; Bangerter, E.; Herren, U.; Posantzis, D.; Bulut, Z.; Ammann, P.; et al. Selection signatures in goats reveal copy number variants underlying breed-defining coat color phenotypes. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Van Deventer, R.; Rhode, C.; Marx, M.; Roodt-Wilding, R. Elucidation of coat colour genetics in blue wildebeest. Mamm. Biol. 2021, 101, 439–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Grabolus, D.; Wacławik, P.; Zatoń-Dobrowolska, M. Differences in melanin type and content among color variations in American mink (Neovison vison). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 100, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tsatmali, M.; Ancans, J.; Thody, A.J. Melanocyte Function and Its Control by Melanocortin Peptides. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2002, 50, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sugumaran, M. Reactivities of Quinone Methides versus o-Quinones in Catecholamine Metabolism and Eumelanin Biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ito, S.; Wakamatsu, K. Chemistry of Mixed Melanogenesis—Pivotal Roles of Dopaquinone. Photochem. Photobiol. 2008, 84, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ito, S. A Chemist’s View of Melanogenesis. Pigment Cell Res. 2003, 16, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Solano, F. On the Metal Cofactor in the Tyrosinase Family. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Esposito, R.; D’Aniello, S.; Squarzoni, P.; Pezzotti, M.R.; Ristoratore, F.; Spagnuolo, A. New Insights into the Evolution of Metazoan Tyrosinase Gene Family. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cosso, G.; Carcangiu, V.; Luridiana, S.; Fiori, S.; Columbano, N.; Masala, G.; Careddu, G.M.; Passino, E.S.; Mura, M.C. Characterization of the Sarcidano Horse Coat Color Genes. Animals 2022, 12, 2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shang, S.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Dang, W.; Zhang, J.; Qin, X.; Irwin, D.M.; Wang, Q.; Liu, F.; Wang, Z.; et al. Synergy between MC1R and ASIP for coat color in horses (Equus caballus). J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 1578–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reissmann, M.; Musa, L.; Zakizadeh, S.; Ludwig, A. Distribution of coat-color-associated alleles in the domestic horse population and Przewalski’s horse. J. Appl. Genet. 2016, 57, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mura, M.C.; Carcangiu, V.; Cosso, G.; Columbano, N.; Passino, E.S.; Luridiana, S. Discrepancies between Genetic and Visual Coat Color Assignment in Sarcidano Horse. Animals 2024, 14, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ji, R.; Tao, Y. Melanocortin-1 receptor mutations and pigmentation: Insights from large animals. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2022, 189, 179–213. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hida, T.; Wakamatsu, K.; Sviderskaya, E.V.; Donkin, A.J.; Mobtoliu, L.; Lamoreux, M.L.; Yu, B.; Millhauser, G.L.; Ito, S.; Barsh, G.S.; et al. Agouti protein, mahogunin, and attractin in pheomelanogenesis and melanoblast-like alteration of melanocytes: A cAMP-independent pathway. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2009, 22, 623–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. García-Borrón, J.C.; Sánchez-Laorden, B.L.; Jiménez-Cervantes, C. Melanocortin-1 receptor structure and functional regulation. Pigment Cell Res. 2005, 18, 393–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wagner, H.; Reissmann, M. New polymorphism detected in the horse MC1R gene. Anim. Genet. 2000, 31, 289–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Corbin, L.J.; Pope, J.; Sanson, J.; Antczak, D.F.; Miller, D.; Sadeghi, R.; Brooks, S.A. An Independent Locus Upstream of ASIP Controls Variation in the Shade of the Bay Coat Colour in Horses. Genes 2020, 11, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Brooks, S.A.; Bailey, E. Exon skipping in the KIT gene causes a Sabino spotting pattern in horses. Mamm. Genome 2005, 16, 893–902. [Google Scholar]
  79. Mau, C.; Poncet, P.A.; Bucher, B.; Stranzinger, G.; Rider, S. Genetic mapping of dominant white (W), a homozygous lethal condition in the horse (Equus caballus). J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2004, 121, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. McFadden, A.; Vierra, M.; Robilliard, H.; Martin, K.; Brooks, S.A.; Everts, R.E.; Lafayette, C. Population Analysis Identifies 15 Multi-Variant Dominant White Haplotypes in Horses. Animals 2024, 14, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Patterson Rosa, L.; Martin, K.; Vierra, M.; Lundquist, E.; Foster, G.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. A KIT Variant Associated with Increased White Spotting Epistatic to MC1R Genotype in Horses (Equus caballus). Animals 2022, 12, 1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. McFadden, A.; Martin, K.; Foster, G.; Vierra, M.; Lundquist, E.W.; Everts, R.E.; Martin, E.; Mcloone, K.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. 5′UTR Variant in KIT Associated with White Spotting in Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2023, 127, 104563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hug, P.; Jude, R.; Henkel, J.; Jagannathan, V.; Leeb, T. A novel KIT deletion variant in a German Riding Pony with white-spotting coat colour phenotype. Anim. Genet. 2019, 50, 761–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Patterson Rosa, L.; Martin, K.; Vierra, M.; Foster, G.; Lundquist, E.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. Two Variants of KIT Causing White Patterning in Stock-Type Horses. J. Hered. 2021, 112, 447–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Brooks, S.A.; Terry, R.B.; Bailey, E. A PCR-RFLP for KIT associated with tobiano spotting pattern in horses. Anim. Genet. 2002, 33, 301–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Brooks, S.A.; Lear, T.L.; Adelson, D.L.; Bailey, E. A chromosome inversion near the KIT gene and the Tobiano spotting pattern in horses. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2008, 119, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Voß, K.; Tetens, J.; Thaller, G.; Becker, D. Coat Color Roan Shows Association with KIT Variants and No Evidence of Lethality in Icelandic Horses. Genes 2020, 11, 680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mariat, D.; Taourit, S.; Guérin, G. A mutation in the MATP gene causes the cream coat colour in the horse. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2003, 35, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sevane, N.; Sanz, C.R.; Dunner, S. Explicit evidence for a missense mutation in exon 4 of SLC45A2 gene causing the pearl coat dilution in horses. Anim. Genet. 2019, 50, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cieslak, J.; Brooks, S.A.; Wodas, L.; Mantaj, W.; Borowska, A.; Sliwowska, J.H.; Ziarniak, K.; Mackowski, M. Genetic Background of the Polish Primitive Horse (Konik) Coat Color Variation—New Insight into Dun Dilution Phenotypic Effect. J. Hered. 2021, 112, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rubin, C.; Hodge, M.; Naboulsi, R.; Beckman, M.; Bellone, R.R.; Kallenberg, A.; J’Usrey, R.; Ohmura, H.; Seki, K.; Ohnuma, A.; et al. An intronic copy number variation in Syntaxin 17 determines speed of greying and melanoma incidence in Grey horses. bioRxiv 2023, 2011–2023. [Google Scholar]
  92. Nowacka-Woszuk, J.; Mackowski, M.; Stefaniuk-Szmukier, M.; Cieslak, J. The equine graying with age mutation of the STX17 gene: A copy number study using droplet digital PCR reveals a new pattern. Anim. Genet. 2021, 52, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Flesher, J.L.; Paterson-Coleman, E.K.; Vasudeva, P.; Ruiz-Vega, R.; Marshall, M.; Pearlman, E.; MacGregor, G.R.; Neumann, J.; Ganesan, A.K. Delineating the role of MITF isoforms in pigmentation and tissue homeostasis. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2020, 33, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Henkel, J.; Lafayette, C.; Brooks, S.A.; Martin, K.; Patterson-Rosa, L.; Cook, D.; Jagannathan, V.; Leeb, T. Whole-genome sequencing reveals a large deletion in the MITF gene in horses with white spotted coat colour and increased risk of deafness. Anim. Genet. 2019, 50, 172–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Magdesian, K.G.; Tanaka, J.; Bellone, R.R. A De Novo MITF Deletion Explains a Novel Splashed White Phenotype in an American Paint Horse. J. Hered. 2020, 111, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Patterson Rosa, L.; Martin, K.; Vierra, M.; Foster, G.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. Non-frameshift deletion on MITF is associated with a novel splashed white spotting pattern in horses (Equus caballus). Anim. Genet. 2022, 53, 538–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Bellone, R.R.; Tanaka, J.; Esdaile, E.; Sutton, R.B.; Payette, F.; Leduc, L.; Till, B.J.; Abdel-Ghaffar, A.K.; Hammond, M.; Magdesian, K.G. A de novo 2.3 kb structural variant in MITF explains a novel splashed white phenotype in a Thoroughbred family. Anim. Genet. 2023, 54, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. McFadden, A.; Martin, K.; Foster, G.; Vierra, M.; Lundquist, E.W.; Everts, R.E.; Martin, E.; McLoone, K.; Brooks, S.A.; Lafayette, C. Two Novel Variants in MITF and PAX3 Associated with Splashed White Phenotypes in Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2023, 128, 104875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kim, N.; Chae, H.; Baek, K.; Cho, I.; Jung, Y.; Woo, J.; Park, S.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.; Yang, Y. A Study on the Changes of Coat Color-Related Genes according to Generational Changes in Jeju Horses. JET 2015, 30, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, D.; Ru, W.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.; He, X.; Fan, G.; Mao, B.; Zhuou, X.; Qin, Y. Chemical constituents and bioactivities of Colla corii asini. Drug Discov. Ther. 2014, 8, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, S.; Su, J.; Yang, Q.; Sun, M.; Wang, Z.; Yu, J.; Jafari, H.; Lei, C.; Sun, Y.; Dang, R. Genome-wide analyses based on a novel donkey 40K liquid chip reveal the gene responsible for coat color diversity in Chinese Dezhou donkey. Anim. Genet. 2024, 55, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sánchez-Guerrero, M.J.; Solé, M.; Azor, P.J.; Sölkner, J.; Valera, M. Genetic and environmental risk factors for vitiligo and melanoma in Pura Raza Español horses. Equine Vet. J. 2019, 51, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Stiegler, J.; Brickley, S. Vitiligo: A Comprehensive Overview. J. Dermatol. Nurses Assoc. 2021, 13, 18–27. [Google Scholar]
  104. Druml, T.; Brem, G.; Horna, M.; Ricard, A.; Grilz-Seger, G. DPF3, A Putative Candidate Gene for Melanoma Etiopathogenesis in Gray Horses. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2022, 108, 103797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Pulos, W.L.; Hutt, F.B. Lethal dominant white in horses. Heredity 1969, 60, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Esdaile, E.; Kallenberg, A.; Avila, F.; Bellone, R.R. Identification of W13 in the American Miniature Horse and Shetland Pony Populations. Genes 2021, 12, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Magdesian, K.G.; Williams, D.C.; Aleman, M.; LeCouteur, R.A.; Madigan, J.E. Evaluation of deafness in American Paint Horses by phenotype, brainstem auditory-evoked responses, and endothelin receptor B genotype. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2009, 235, 1204–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sandmeyer, L.S.; Kingsley, N.B.; Walder, C.; Archer, S.; Leis, M.L.; Bellone, R.R.; Bauer, B.S. Risk factors for equine recurrent uveitis in a population of Appaloosa horses in western Canada. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2020, 23, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rockwell, H.; Mack, M.; Famula, T.; Sandmeyer, L.; Bauer, B.; Dwyer, A.; Lassaline, M.; Besson, S.; Archer, S.; McCue, M.; et al. Genetic investigation of equine recurrent uveitis in Appaloosa horses. Anim. Genet. 2020, 51, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gilger, B.C. Equine recurrent uveitis: The viewpoint from the USA. Equine Vet. J. 2010, 42, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cappai, M.G.; Picciau, M.; Nieddu, G.; Sogos, I.; Cherchi, R.; Pinna, W. Cutaneous metabolic pathway of tyrosine as a precursor to melanin in Asinara’s white donkey, Equus asinus L., 1758. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 14, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pathway of melanin synthesis.
Figure 1. Pathway of melanin synthesis.
Animals 14 01802 g001
Figure 2. Mechanism of regulation of the melanogenesis signaling pathway (eai04916) by coat-color-linked genes (MC1R, TYR, MITF, ASIP, and KIT).
Figure 2. Mechanism of regulation of the melanogenesis signaling pathway (eai04916) by coat-color-linked genes (MC1R, TYR, MITF, ASIP, and KIT).
Animals 14 01802 g002
Table 1. Overview of genes associated with coat color phenotypes in animals.
Table 1. Overview of genes associated with coat color phenotypes in animals.
GeneSpeciesCoat ColorReferences
MC1RHorsesChestnut[28]
DonkeysRed[29]
ASIPHorsesBlack[30]
DonkeysBlack[31,32]
TYRDonkeysWhite[33]
SILVHorsesSliver dapple[34]
MITFHorsesSplashed white[35]
KITHorsesDominant white[36]
HorsesTobiano[37]
HorsesSabino[38]
HorsesRoan[39]
DonkeysWhite[40]
STX17HorsesGray[41]
SLC45A2HorsesSnowdrop[42]
HorsesPearl/cream[43]
SLC36A1HorsesChampagne[44]
TBX3DonkeysDun[6]
HorsesDun[45]
TRPM1HorsesLeopard complex spotting[36]
PMEL17HorsesSliver dapple[46]
Table 2. Genotypes of the three basic coat colors in horses.
Table 2. Genotypes of the three basic coat colors in horses.
Coat ColorExtension GenotypeAgouti GenotypeGenotype
BlackE-aaEEaa/Eeaa
BayE-A-EEAA/EeAA/EEAa/EeAa
ChestnuteeA-/aaeeAA/eeAa/eeaa
Table 3. Association of the KIT gene with white coat color traits.
Table 3. Association of the KIT gene with white coat color traits.
TraitAllele Symbol GenePhenotypeReferences
Dominant WhiteW1–W35 White patterning or an entirely white coat with pink skin underneath[36]
TobianoTOKITLarge markings on legs and small head markings[37]
SabinoSB1 A white spotting pattern with towering uneven stockings and a blaze on the face[38]
RoanRN Dispersed white hair and dark points[39]
Table 4. Mutant alleles in the MITF gene and their association with coat color phenotypes.
Table 4. Mutant alleles in the MITF gene and their association with coat color phenotypes.
GeneAlleleMutationPhenotypeReference
MITFSW110 bp insertionSplashed white[35]
MITFSW3Small deletionSplashed white[35]
MITFSW563 kb deletionWhite spotting, blue eyes[94]
MITFSW68.7 kb deletionSplashed white, blue eyes[95]
MITFSW7A novel three-base pair deletionSplashed white[96]
MITFSW82.3 kb deletionSplashed white, blue eyes[97]
MITFSW9Missense mutationSplashed white, blue eyes[98]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, W.; Kou, X.; Liang, H.; Ren, W.; Khan, M.Z.; Wang, C. Coloration in Equine: Overview of Candidate Genes Associated with Coat Color Phenotypes. Animals 2024, 14, 1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121802

AMA Style

Liu X, Peng Y, Zhang X, Wang X, Chen W, Kou X, Liang H, Ren W, Khan MZ, Wang C. Coloration in Equine: Overview of Candidate Genes Associated with Coat Color Phenotypes. Animals. 2024; 14(12):1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xiaotong, Yongdong Peng, Xinhao Zhang, Xinrui Wang, Wenting Chen, Xiyan Kou, Huili Liang, Wei Ren, Muhammad Zahoor Khan, and Changfa Wang. 2024. "Coloration in Equine: Overview of Candidate Genes Associated with Coat Color Phenotypes" Animals 14, no. 12: 1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14121802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop