Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Population Management Based on Trap–Neuter–Return and Trap–Neuter–Adoption Practices in a Free-Roaming Cat Colony in the Federal District, Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Successful Transvenous Extraction of Adult Dirofilaria immitis Parasites from a Naturally Infected Domestic Ferret (Mustela putorius furo)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heat Stress Induces Alterations in Gene Expression of Actin Cytoskeleton and Filament of Cellular Components Causing Gut Disruption in Growing–Finishing Pigs

1
Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Republic of Korea
2
School of Animal Life Convergence Science, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea
3
Institute of Applied Humanimal Science, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2024, 14(17), 2476; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172476
Submission received: 3 July 2024 / Revised: 17 August 2024 / Accepted: 22 August 2024 / Published: 26 August 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Acute heat stress in animals impairs the intestinal barrier function, particularly tight junction (TJ) depression, which occurs in pigs owing to the lack of functional sweat glands for evaporative heat loss. However, the mechanisms by which heat stress affects TJ regulation are not fully understood. We investigated the effect of heat stress on the TJ and its interaction with potential genes using transcriptomic analysis of the porcine jejunum. We found that heat stress reduced the expression of TJ proteins and induced alterations in genes involved in the actin cytoskeleton and filament-binding pathways.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the impact of heat stress (HS) on the expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins and the interaction between genes affecting intestinal barrier function using transcriptomics in the porcine jejunum. Twenty-four barrows (crossbred Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc; average initial body weight, 56.71 ± 1.74 kg) were placed in different temperatures (normal temperature [NT]; HS) and reared for 56 days. At the end of the experiment, jejunal samples were collected from three pigs per treatment for transcriptome and reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analyses. We identified 43 differentially expressed genes, involving five Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways, eight molecular functions, seven cellular components (CCs), and nine biological processes, using gene ontology enrichment analysis. Genes associated with the actin cytoskeleton, filament-binding pathways, and TJ proteins were selected and analyzed by RT-qPCR. Significant differences in relative mRNA expression showed that downregulated genes in the HS group included ZO1, CLDN1, OCLN, PCK1, and PCK2, whereas ACTG2, DES, MYL9, MYLK, TPM1, TPM2, CNN1, PDLIM3, and PCP4 were upregulated by HS (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that HS in growing-finishing pigs induces depression in gut integrity, which may be related to genes involved in the actin cytoskeleton and filaments of CC.

1. Introduction

As global warming accelerates worldwide, the adverse effects of heat stress (HS) on the livestock industry has received considerable attention [1,2]. HS manifests when the ambient temperature exceeds the thermoneutral zone of an animal, and the physiological mechanisms for thermoregulation, such as perspiration, respiration, or panting, are insufficient to prevent elevation in body temperature [3,4]. Pigs, in particular, are sensitive to HS as they lack functional sweat glands for evaporative heat loss [5]. The consequences of HS on swine production are reduced feed intake and growth rate and increased mortality, resulting from intricate changes in morphological and physiological functioning of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [6,7].
Higher temperatures induce the dispersion of blood to the periphery for heat dissipation, which results in reduced blood supply and decreased nutrient flow in the intestinal epithelium [8,9]. Consequently, HS impairs intestinal integrity and function, thereby increasing intestinal permeability and susceptibility to infectious diseases [10]. Intestinal permeability, regulated by tight junction (TJ) proteins such as zonula occludens-1 (ZO1), occludin (OCLN), and claudins (CLDNs), is responsible for translocation of antigens, toxins, and pathogens. This stimulates the immune system, and affects nutrient digestibility and absorption across the intestinal epithelium [11,12].
Transmembrane proteins (TJ proteins) that constitute the structure of a TJ interact with the actin cytoskeleton within the cell to regulate the TJ [13]. Together with adherens junctions, TJ proteins are closely associated with the perijunctional actomyosin ring, a belt-like structure composed of actin and myosin II that encircles the apical pole of epithelial cells. This belt extends the actin filaments that interact with the TJ, thereby allowing circumferential contractions of the perijunctional actomyosin ring, thereby regulating TJ architecture and paracellular permeability [14]. However, the mechanisms underlying the alteration of intestinal permeability and the interaction with TJ regulation in the actin cytoskeleton and filament pathways of pigs exposed to HS are not fully understood. Therefore, this study was conducted to characterize the impact of HS on the mechanism of TJ regulation in the porcine jejunum using transcriptomic analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted on the premises of the National Institute of Animal Science, adhering to the guidelines set forth by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Animal Science (No. 2022-0554). All the methods were followed sequentially, except the quantitative validation of real-time PCR, which was performed in our previous study [15].

2.1. Animals and Treatments

In this study, a total of 24 barrows (crossbred Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc; with an average initial body weight of 56.71 ± 1.74 kg) were employed. They were randomly divided into two treatment groups, namely, optimal temperature (NT, n = 8) and HS (n = 8). In NT treatment, an environment with an average temperature of 23 °C and relative humidity of 70% was maintained throughout the experimental period. In HS treatment, an average temperature of 32 °C and relative humidity of 85% was maintained during the feeding trial. The experimental period lasted for 56 days (28 days in the grower phase and 28 days in the finisher phase). A basal diet was formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements outlined by the National Research Council [16] for growing–finishing pigs. The experimental diet formulation is presented in Table S2. Throughout the study, the pigs were provided ad libitum access to water and feed.

2.2. Sample Collection

At the conclusion of the feeding trial, within the experimental period, three pigs from each treatment group were selected and euthanized for gut sample collection. The abdominal cavity was promptly opened, and the intestinal tissue segments were carefully extracted and rinsed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Approximately 500 mg of jejunal tissue, from the midpoint of the total length of the small intestine, was collected and immediately flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. These samples were stored at −80 °C until required for subsequent analysis.

2.3. Transcriptomic Analysis

Transcriptomic data were employed and reprocessed as described in our previous study [15]. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol™ reagent, for transcriptomic analysis (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA quality was evaluated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Amstelveen, The Netherlands), and RNA quantification was performed using an ND-2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Inc., Madison, WI, USA). Libraries were prepared from total RNA using the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA-Seq Kit (New England Biolabs Ltd., Hitchin, UK). mRNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the Poly(A) RNA Selection Kit (LEXOGEN, Inc., Vienna, Austria) and used for cDNA synthesis and fragmentation. Indexing was performed using Illumina indexes 1–12, and a PCR was used for the enrichment process. The mean fragment size of the libraries was determined using a TapeStation HS D1000 Screen Tape (Agilent Technologies, Amstelveen, The Netherlands). Quantification was performed using a library quantification kit on a StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, Grand Isle, NY, USA). High-throughput sequencing (paired-end 100 sequencing) was performed using NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). FastQC [17] was used for the quality control of raw sequencing data. Adapter sequences and low-quality reads (<Q20) were removed using FASTX_Trimmer [18] and BBMap [19]. The cleaned reads were mapped to the NCBI Genome Sus scrofa using TopHat [20]. Read Count (RC) data were normalized using the FPKM + Geometric method in EdgeR (R software V 3.6.0) [21]. Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKMs) values were calculated using Cufflinks [22]. Data analysis and visualization were performed with ExDEGA (Excel-based Differentially Expressed Gene Analysis) software (ebiogen Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea).

2.4. Bioinformatic Analysis

ExDEGA software, developed by ebiogen (Seoul, Republic of Korea), was used for the initial processing and analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Subsequently, DEGA was conducted using ExDEGA v1.6.8 software, applying a cut-off at a normalized gene expression (log2) of 4 and a p-value < 0.05. DEGs were identified based on a ≥2.0-fold change observed in transcript levels. Following DEG filtering, gene ontology (GO) annotation analysis was conducted using the DAVID bioinformatics program (https://david.ncifcrf.gov, accessed on 3 March 2024) for gene identification and annotation. The RNA-Seq data were analyzed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (www.genome.jp, accessed on 3 March 2024).

2.5. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the liquid nitrogen-frozen jejunum samples using TRIzol Reagent (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan). RNA integrity and quality were evaluated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometric analysis at optical density 260/280, respectively. cDNA was synthesized using a commercial reverse transcription (RT) kit (Takara Bio Inc.). The cDNA products were then stored at −20 °C for subsequent relative quantification by PCR. All reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reactions (RT-qPCR) were performed in triplicate, using SYBR Green kits on an Applied Biosystems ABI 7500 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The expression levels of the genes were normalized by glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) using the 2−ΔΔCT method. The primer sequences used for RT-qPCR are listed in Table 1.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Pigs from each treatment group were used as experimental units for gene expression using real-time PCR. Statistical analyses were performed using the GLM procedure in SAS software 9.4 (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA) using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of DEGs

mRNA-sequencing data detected 30,048 genes. A total of 43 DEGs were revealed based on ≥2-fold change, normalized data (log2) ≥ 4, and p-value < 0.05 (Table S1). These DEGs are comprised 28 upregulated and 15 downregulated DEGs and the selected 19 genes relevant to tight junction and actin cytoskeleton formation are presented in Table 2.

3.2. Clustering and Functional Enrichment Analysis

Gene expression between the NT and HS treatments was compared. The genes with a ≥2-fold change value, p < 0.05, and normalized data (log2) < 4 were used to generate a principal component analysis (PCA), volcano plot, clustering heatmap, and functional enrichment annotation of the treatments. The results of the PCA using DEGs showed that the x-axis and y-axis rates were 91% and 4%, respectively, indicating in each temperature condition a stronger relationship in the x-axis (Principal Component 1, PC1) than in the y-axis (PC2) (Figure 1A), so we decided to compare the groups with respect to HS impact. HS impact highlights two Principal Components explaining 95% of the total variance: 91% of the total variance is explained by PC1, and 4% by PC2. Therefore, the x-axis should be the first principal component indicating a similarity of groups (NT vs. HS) in PC1. The correlation matrix between samples showed that samples within the same group exhibited high correlations. Additionally, the correlations between groups (NT vs. HS) displayed distinct variability, as shown in Figure S6, which supports the observed similarity in PC1 from the PCA analysis. Volcano plot analysis showed that the difference in fold change corresponded to log2 (fold change) (x-axis) and log10 (p-value) (y-axis) (Figure 1B). The gene expression patterns of DEGs between the NT and HS treatments are shown in the hierarchical cluster analysis (Figure 1C). An analysis was conducted for each sample in the two treatments, and the results demonstrated that from six samples there were two distinct gene expression patterns associated with the temperature conditions.
Functional enrichment analyses of the jejunum were performed based on the GO classification and KEGG database (Figure 1D). Enrichment was expressed as biological process (BP), cellular component (CC), molecular function (MF), and KEGG pathway, and the top 10 GO classifications were selected. BPs were enriched in nine pathways, viz., bleb assembly, muscle structure development, actin filament organization, negative regulation of complement activation, T cell-mediated immunity, response to heat, sarcomere organization, muscle contraction, and negative regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. In CC, DEGs were mainly enriched in seven pathways, viz., stress fiber, Z-disc, cytoplasm, actin cytoskeleton, actin filament, cytolytic granules, and filamentous actin. MFs were enriched in eight pathways, viz., actin binding, structural constituents of muscle, pyridoxal phosphate binding, actin filament binding, calmodulin binding, muscle alpha-actinin binding, glutathione transferase activity, and metal ion binding (including calmodulin binding). KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the DEGs were related to five pathways, viz., vascular smooth muscle contraction, motor proteins, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and actin cytoskeleton regulation.

3.3. Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) Network Analysis

The network for the interaction between genes and DEGs of NT and HS treatments is presented in Figure 2. According to gene interaction network analysis, significant gene interactions were associated with myosin light chain 9 (MYL9). Moreover, there were eight significant genes interacting with MYL9.

3.4. Key Candidate Genes Involving in Actin Cytoskeleton and Filament Formation Pathway

We conducted validation by qPCR selecting 12 upregulated DEGs and two downregulated DEGs involving actin cytoskeleton (actin gamma 2, ACTG2; desmin, DES; glycogen phosphorylase, PYGM; MYL9; myosin light chain kinase, MYLK; protein phosphatase 1 regulatory inhibitor subunit 14A, PPP1R13A; tropomyosin 1, TPM1; tropomyosin 2, TPM2; calponin1 1, CNN1; PDZ and LIM domain 3, PDLIM3; PDZ and LIM domain 7, PDLIM7; Purkinje cell protein 4, PCP4; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1, PCK1; and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2, PCK2) along with five genes associated with TJs and adherens junctions (ZO1, CLDN1, CLDN3, CLDN4, and OCLN) in porcine jejunal tissue (Table 2).

3.5. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Validation of Gene Expression

The relative mRNA levels of the selected genes were compared at different temperatures (NT vs. HS) (Figure 3). Among the selected genes, 14 of the 19 genes revealed significant differences between the NT and HS groups. Response to HS in genes related to gut integrity resulted in downregulation of ZO1, CLDN1, and OCLN compared to the NT condition. Regarding actin cytoskeleton and filament, HS treatment revealed significantly higher relative mRNA levels of ACTG2, DES, and MYL9 than the NT treatment (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the HS group was significantly upregulated in TPM1, TPM2, CNN1, PDLIM3, and PCP4 compared to the NT group (p < 0.05). However, the relative mRNA levels of PCK1 and PCK2 presented significantly downregulated expression in the HS group compared to those in the NT group (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

The dominant contributing variables as gene transcriptions were in the pigs exposed to high thermal temperatures. These were indicated by exclusive eigenvalues in the equation of the scores: −1.707 (NT-1), −1.293 (NT-2), −3.304 (NT-3), −0.325 (HS-1), 0.813 (HS-2), 1.815 (HS-3). The PCA analysis also clearly distinguished environmental thermal temperature, indicating significant genetic differences between these two groups. However, significant variation within the group was also observed, confirming previous reports that the heat stress response varies within populations due to underlying genetic variation [23,24,25,26].
High temperature conditions in the housing environment affect the health, production, and welfare of farm animals [26,27,28]. Pigs, in particular, are susceptible to HS owing to their poorly developed sweat glands and thick subcutaneous fat layers, which hinder efficient heat dissipation [29]. HS in pigs causes a range of adverse effects on intestinal morphology, mucosal immunity, integrity, digestive enzyme secretion, and antioxidant status [10]. These adverse effects of HS on animal health and productivity are driven by the disruption of intestinal barrier function, which has been caused under 30–35 °C temperatures [30,31,32]. Hyperthermia compromises the intestinal barrier function, which results in increased permeability [33,34,35]. TJs are primarily composed of structural and functional proteins. Structural proteins including OCLN, members of the CLDNs, and junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs) form the core structural framework. Intestinal epithelial cells are connected by intercellular TJ proteins that regulate paracellular permeability and are essential for maintaining the integrity of the epithelial barrier [36].
The function of these proteins is altered by HS, which downregulates the expression of TJ proteins. In this study, the relative mRNA levels of TJ proteins (ZO1, CLDN1, and OCLN) were downregulated under HS conditions. ZO1 is a plaque protein that binds to other proteins, creating a scaffold, or interacts with specific transmembrane proteins to anchor them to the cytoskeleton [37]. CLDN1 forms the structural foundation of TJs by sealing the gaps between adjacent epithelial cells [38,39]. Furthermore, OCLN, containing one intracellular loop and two neutral extracellular loops, plays a critical role in sealing adjacent cells, forming a barrier against macromolecules and small ions [40]. In terms of gene expression, these functional proteins in the intestinal epithelial cells showed differences in response to HS. This seems to be affected by the short- or long-term impact of heat exposure time. The short-term impact of HS in the porcine jejunum (7–21 h exposure) led to reduced ZO1 expression, but CLDN1 expression increased [41]. However, some studies reported that porcine jejunum exposed to HS (>33 °C) for over 28 days increased the relative mRNA expression of TJ proteins containing ZO1, CLDN1, and OCLN compared to that at normal temperature (22 °C), which was in accordance with our results [42,43].
We identified DEGs involved in actin cytoskeleton and myosin filament organization pathways in intestinal epithelial cells (Figure 4). In this study, porcine jejunal tissues exposed to chronic HS revealed significantly upregulated relative mRNA expression of ACTG2, DES, MYL9, MYLK, TPM1, TPM2, CNN1, PDLIM3, and PCP4, whereas the expression of PCK1 and PCK2 was downregulated. These genes are associated with the integrity and permeability of the intestinal barrier. The epithelial barrier function is regulated by apical junctions and specialized structures within the plasma membrane. These structures are composed of adhesive and scaffolding proteins anchored to diverse cytoskeletal structures such as actin filaments, intermediate filaments, and microtubules [44]. Cytoskeletal proteins are essential for the differentiation, directional migration, and continuous renewal of epithelial cells along the crypt–villus axis [45]. Additionally, the actin cytoskeleton plays a critical role in regulating junctional integrity and remodeling under physiological and pathological conditions. Consequently, the expression of cytoskeletal protein genes, including ACTG2, TPM1, TPM2, MYL9, and MYLK, exposed to high temperatures might be increased, as HS induces the reorganization of apical junctions in jejunal epithelial barrier dysfunction.
ACTG2 participates in gastrointestinal peristalsis by regulating cell motility and maintaining the cell skeleton, both of which are related to the contraction ability of epithelial cells [46]. Consistent with our results, a previous study reported that ACTG2 expression was negatively correlated with the height of the epithelium in the small intestine of rabbits [47]. Furthermore, intestinal damage from ischemia reperfusion injury leads to increased serum concentration of ACTG2 in rats [48].
The predominance of differentially expressed proteins associated with the cytoskeleton indicated the impact of HS on cellular architecture and motility. It was reported that MYL9, involved in cell motility and contraction, is upregulated by HS, resulting in increased intestinal permeability in pigs [49]. MYLK, also known as MLCK, regulates TJ permeability and catalyzes MYL9 phosphorylation [49,50,51]. In agreement with this study, previous studies have reported that HS induces intestinal barrier permeability with the upregulated expression of MYLK in pigs and rats [49,52]. TPM1 and TPM2 are isoforms of tropomyosin that are essential for regulating the assembly, stability, and motility of intestinal epithelial cells [53]. The upregulation of proteins such as ACTG2, MYL9, TPM1, TPM2, and MYLK in response to HS likely indicates the coordinated modulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics, adversely affecting intestinal integrity. DES is a cytoskeleton protein that participates in the construction of the cytoskeletal structure and muscle contraction as a major intermediate filament, resulting in the integrity and rigidity of muscle cells [54,55]. Previous studies have shown that proteins interact with heat shock proteins (HSPs), that can be induced by HS [56]. Similar to that in our study, another study reported that HS in porcine skeletal muscle significantly increased the mRNA expression of DES [57]. The upregulated PCP4, which is involved in acquired immunity and the resistance to pathological microbiota infection [58], may indicate an activated immune system with increased intestinal permeability resulting from HS. There are two unique isoforms of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, viz., the cytoplasmic isoform (PCK1) and the mitochondrial isoform (PCK2). PCK1 is a crucial enzyme in gluconeogenesis and catalyzes the conversion of oxaloacetate to phosphoenolpyruvate, a key intermediate in the glycolytic and gluconeogenic pathways [59,60]. Downregulation of PCK1 may result from disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism [61]. Pigs with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) had significantly lower PCK1 mRNA levels in the jejunum and decreased CLDN expression compared to healthy pigs [62]. To normalize mitochondrial function, the biosynthesis of glycerophospholipids, the main components of biomembranes, is indispensable. Mitochondrial morphology and function affect the phospholipid composition of the membrane [60,63]. Thus, PCK2 plays an important role in the regulation of glycerol phosphate synthesis [64]. The downregulation of PCK2 expression may be caused by a decrease in glycerophospholipid metabolism. Recent studies have demonstrated that depressed PCK2 levels in different tissues, such as the porcine jejunum and hepatocytes, result from mycotoxin exposure [65,66]. Furthermore, the relative intensity of intestinal TJ proteins such as CLDN4, ZO1, and OCLN in the deoxynivalenol-supplemented group decreased [66]. This study showed that HS affects porcine jejunal mucosal gluconeogenesis by decreasing mucosal glucose homeostasis and energy metabolism in the cytoplasm and mitochondria.

5. Conclusions

We identified 43 DEGs in the porcine jejunum exposed to HS, and these genes were associated with the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and filament-binding in the KEGG pathway. Furthermore, genes involved in TJ, actin cytoskeleton, and filament formation revealed changes in their relative mRNA expression. Based on these outcomes, our findings suggest that HS induces depression in gut integrity, which may be related to genes involved in the actin cytoskeleton and filaments of cellular components in growing–finishing pigs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani14172476/s1, Table S1: Genes differentially expressed in porcine jejunum (NT vs. HT). Table S2: Ingredients and nutrient composition in the experimental diets. File S1: STRING network interaction score. Figure S1: Vascular Smooth Muscle Contraction in KEGG pathway. Figure S2: Motor Proteins in KEGG pathway. Figure S3: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in KEGG pathway. Figure S4: Dilated Cardiomyopathy in KEGG pathway. Figure S5: Regulation of Actin Cytoskeleton in KEGG pathway. Figure S6: Correlation matrix analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C. and M.K.; methodology, M.K.; software, M.K.; validation, Y.C., H.P., J.K., H.L., and M.K.; formal analysis, H.P., J.K., and H.L.; investigation, Y.C.; resources, Y.C.; data curation, M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, Y.C., M.K. and H.L.; visualization, H.P., J.K., and H.L.; supervision, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea (Grant number: PJ01681002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of NIAS (No. 2022-0554).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All figures and tables used to support the results of this study have been included.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rebez, E.B.; Sejian, V.; Silpa, M.V.; Dunshea, F.R. Heat stress and histopathological changes of vital organs: A novel approach to assess climate resilience in farm animals. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Silva, W.C.D.; Silva, J.A.R.D.; Martorano, L.G.; Silva, É.B.R.D.; Sousa, C.E.L.; Neves, K.A.L.; de Araújo, C.V.; Joaquim, L.A.; Rodrigues, T.C.G.D.C.; Belo, T.S.; et al. Thermographic Profiles in Livestock Systems under Full Sun and Shaded Pastures during an Extreme Climate Event in the Eastern Amazon, Brazil: El Niño of 2023. Animals 2024, 14, 855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ghezzi, M.D.; Napolitano, F.; Casas-Alvarado, A.; Hernández-Ávalos, I.; Domínguez-Oliva, A.; Olmos-Hernández, A.; Pereira, A.M. Utilization of infrared thermography in assessing thermal responses of farm animals under heat stress. Animals 2024, 14, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mount, L.E. Heat transfer between animal and environment. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1978, 37, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cottrell, J.J.; Liu, F.; Hung, A.T.; DiGiacomo, K.; Chauhan, S.S.; Leury, B.J.; Furness, J.B.; Celi, P.; Dunshea, F.R. Nutritional strategies to alleviate heat stress in pigs. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 1391–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gabler, N.K.; Pearce, S.C. The impact of heat stress on intestinal function and productivity in grow-finish pigs. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 1403–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Serviento, A.M.; Labussière, E.; Castex, M.; Renaudeau, D.J.J. Effect of heat stress and feeding management on growth performance and physiological responses of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lambert, G.P. Stress-induced gastrointestinal barrier dysfunction and its inflammatory effects. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, E101–E108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, Y.E.; Zhao, Y.Q.; Wang, H.; Fan, M. Pathophysiological factors underlying heatstroke. Med. Hypotheses 2006, 67, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Patra, A.K.; Kar, I. Heat stress on microbiota composition, barrier integrity, and nutrient transport in gut, production performance, and its amelioration in farm animals. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 211–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pearce, S.C.; Mani, V.; Boddicker, R.L.; Johnson, J.S.; Weber, T.E.; Ross, J.W.; Rhoads, R.P.; Baumgard, L.H.; Gabler, N.K. Heat stress reduces intestinal barrier integrity and favors intestinal glucose transport in growing pigs. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Turner, J. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 799–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fanning, A.S.; Jameson, B.J.; Jesaitis, L.A.; Anderson, J.M. The tight junction protein ZO-1 establishes a link between the transmembrane protein occludin and the actin cytoskeleton. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 29745–29753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ulluwishewa, D.; Anderson, R.C.; McNabb, W.C.; Moughan, P.J.; Wells, J.M.; Roy, N.C. Regulation of tight junction permeability by intestinal bacteria and dietary components. J. Nutr. 2011, 141, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kim, M.; Roura, E.; Choi, Y.; Kim, J. Transcriptomic analysis of the porcine gut in response to heat stress and dietary soluble fiber from beet pulp. Genes 2022, 13, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (accessed on 15 April 2022).
  18. FASTX Toolkit. Available online: http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/ (accessed on 15 April 2022).
  19. BBMap. Available online: https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap/ (accessed on 15 April 2022).
  20. Trapnell, C.; Pachter, L.; Salzberg, S.L. TopHat: Discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1105–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer Software]. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 20 November 2020).
  22. Roberts, A.; Trapnell, C.; Donaghey, J.; Rinn, J.L.; Pachter, L. Improving RNA-Seq expression estimates by correcting for fragment bias. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lan, X.; Hsieh, J.C.; Schmidt, C.J.; Zhu, Q.; Lamont, S.J. Liver transcriptome response to hyperthermic stress in three distinct chicken lines. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Srikanth, K.; Park, J.E.; Ji, S.Y.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, Y.K.; Kumar, H.; Kim, M.; Baek, Y.C.; Kim, H.; Jang, G.W.; et al. Genome-wide transcriptome and metabolome analyses provide novel insights and suggest a sex-specific response to heat stress in pigs. Genes 2020, 11, 540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sarais, F.; Metzger, K.; Hadlich, F.; Kalbe, C.; Ponsuksili, S. Transcriptomic response of differentiating porcine myotubes to thermal stress and donor piglet age. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Renaudeau, D.; Collin, A.; Yahav, S.; De Basilio, V.; Gourdine, J.L.; Collier, R.J. Adaptation to hot climate and strategies to alleviate heat stress in livestock production. Animal 2012, 6, 707–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Becker, C.A.; Collier, R.J.; Stone, A.E. Invited review: Physiological and behavioral effects of heat stress in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 6751–6770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Silva, W.C.D.; Silva, J.A.R.D.; Camargo-Júnior, R.N.C.; Silva, É.B.R.D.; Santos, M.R.P.D.; Viana, R.B.; Silva, A.G.M.; Silva, C.M.G.D.; Lourenço-Júnior, J.D.B. Animal welfare and effects of per-female stress on male and cattle reproduction—A review. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1083469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ross, J.W.; Hale, B.J.; Gabler, N.K.; Rhoads, R.P.; Keating, A.F.; Baumgard, L.H. Physiological consequences of heat stress in pigs. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2015, 55, 1381–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baumgard, L.H.; Rhoads, R.P. Effects of heat stress on postabsorptive metabolism and energetics. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2013, 1, 311–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Godyń, D.; Herbut, P.; Angrecka, S.; Corrêa Vieira, F.M. Use of different cooling methods in pig facilities to alleviate the effects of heat stress—A review. Animals 2020, 10, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ortega, A.D.S.V.; Szabó, C. Adverse effects of heat stress on the intestinal integrity and function of pigs and the mitigation capacity of dietary antioxidants: A review. Animals 2021, 11, 1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lambert, G.P.; Gisolfi, C.V.; Berg, D.J.; Moseley, P.L.; Oberley, L.W.; Kregel, K.C. Selected contribution: Hyperthermia-induced intestinal permeability and the role of oxidative and nitrosative stress. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 92, 1750–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghulam Mohyuddin, S.; Khan, I.; Zada, A.; Qamar, A.; Arbab, A.A.I.; Ma, X.B.; Yu, Z.C.; Liu, X.X.; Yong, Y.H.; Ju, X.H.; et al. Influence of heat stress on intestinal epithelial barrier function, tight junction protein, and immune and reproductive physiology. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 8547379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pearce, S.C.; Mani, V.; Weber, T.E.; Rhoads, R.P.; Patience, J.F.; Baumgard, L.H.; Gabler, N.K. Heat stress and reduced plane of nutrition decreases intestinal integrity and function in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 5183–5193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tang, J.; Cao, L.; Jia, G.; Liu, G.; Chen, X.; Tian, G.; Cai, J.; Shang, H.; Zhao, H. The protective effect of selenium from heat stress-induced porcine small intestinal epithelial cell line (IPEC-J2) injury is associated with regulation expression of selenoproteins. Br. J. Nutr. 2019, 122, 1081–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fanning, A.S.; Mitic, L.L.; Anderson, J.M. Transmembrane proteins in the tight junction barrier. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1999, 10, 1337–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Furuse, M.; Fujita, K.; Hiiragi, T.; Fujimoto, K.; Tsukita, S. Claudin-1 and -2: Novel integral membrane proteins localizing at tight junctions with no sequence similarity to occludin. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 141, 1539–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Furuse, M.; Sasaki, H.; Fujimoto, K.; Tsukita, S. A single gene product, claudin-1 or -2, reconstitutes tight junction strands and recruits occludin in fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 143, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alizadeh, A.; Akbari, P.; Garssen, J.; Fink-Gremmels, J.; Braber, S. Epithelial integrity, junctional complexes, and biomarkers associated with intestinal functions. Tissue Barriers 2022, 10, 1996830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yong, Y.; Li, J.; Gong, D.; Yu, T.; Wu, L.; Hu, C.; Liu, X.; Yu, Z.; Ma, X.; Gooneratne, R.; et al. ERK1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase mediates downregulation of intestinal tight junction proteins in heat stress-induced IBD model in pig. J. Therm. Biol. 2021, 101, 103103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yi, H.; Xiong, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, M.; Liu, S.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, L. Effects of dietary supplementation with l-arginine on the intestinal barrier function in finishing pigs with heat stress. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 104, 1134–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. He, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tang, J.; Jia, G.; Liu, G.; Tian, G.; Chen, X.; Cai, J.; Kang, B.; Zhao, H. Selenium exerts protective effects against heat stress-induced barrier disruption and inflammation response in jejunum of growing pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2022, 102, 496–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ivanov, A.I.; Parkos, C.A.; Nusrat, A. Cytoskeletal regulation of epithelial barrier function during inflammation. Am. J. Pathol. 2010, 177, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gordon, J.I.; Hermiston, M.L. Differentiation and self-renewal in the mouse gastrointestinal epithelium. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1994, 6, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Thorson, W.; Diaz-Horta, O.; Foster, J.N.; Spiliopoulos, M.; Quintero, R.; Farooq, A.; Blanton, S.; Tekin, M. De novo ACTG2 mutations cause congenital distended bladder, microcolon, and intestinal hypoperistalsis. Hum. Genet. 2014, 133, 737–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rzeszotek, S.; Trybek, G.; Tarnowski, M.; Serwin, K.; Jaroń, A.; Schneider, G.; Kolasa, A.; Wiszniewska, B. Colostrum-induced temporary changes in the expression of proteins regulating the epithelial barrier function in the intestine. Foods 2022, 11, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ok, M.; Yildiz, R.; Hatipoglu, F.; Baspinar, N.; Ider, M.; Üney, K.; Ertürk, A.; Durgut, M.K.; Terzi, F. Use of intestine-related biomarkers for detecting intestinal epithelial damage in neonatal calves with diarrhea. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2020, 81, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cui, Y.; Gu, X. Proteomic changes of the porcine small intestine in response to chronic heat stress. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015, 55, 277–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nighot, M.; Al-Sadi, R.; Guo, S.; Rawat, M.; Nighot, P.; Watterson, M.D.; Ma, T.Y. Lipopolysaccharide-induced increase in intestinal epithelial tight permeability is mediated by toll-like receptor 4/myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) activation of myosin light chain kinase expression. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 2698–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Nighot, M.; Rawat, M.; Al-Sadi, R.; Castillo, E.F.; Nighot, P.; Ma, T.Y. Lipopolysaccharide-induced increase in intestinal permeability is mediated by TAK-1 activation of IKK and MLCK/MYLK gene. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 797–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Niu, X.; Hu, C.; Chen, S.; Wen, J.; Liu, X.; Yong, Y.; Yu, Z.; Ma, X.; Li, C.; Wardo, M.; et al. Chitosan-gentamicin conjugate attenuates heat stress-induced intestinal barrier injury via the TLR4/STAT6/MYLK signaling pathway: In vitro and in vivo studies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 321, 121279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Broschat, K.O.; Burgess, D.R. Low Mr tropomyosin isoforms from chicken brain and intestinal epithelium have distinct actin-binding properties. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 13350–13359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, Y.; Qian, H.; Feng, X.; Xiong, Y.; Lei, M.; Ren, Z.; Zuo, B.; Xu, D.; Ma, Y.; Yuan, H. Differential proteome and transcriptome analysis of porcine skeletal muscle during development. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 2093–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shi, X.; Li, C.; Cao, M.; Xu, X.; Zhou, G.; Xiong, Y.L. Comparative proteomic analysis of longissimus dorsi muscle in immuno- and surgically castrated male pigs. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bao, E.; Sultan, K.R.; Nowak, B.; Hartung, J. Localization of heat shock proteins and histopathological changes in the kidneys of transported pigs. Livest. Sci. 2008, 118, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hao, Y.; Liu, J.R.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, P.G.; Feng, Y.J.; Cui, Y.J.; Yang, C.H.; Gu, X.H. The microRNA expression profile in porcine skeletal muscle is changed by constant heat stress. Anim. Genet. 2016, 47, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sui, B.; Chen, D.; Liu, W.; Tian, B.; Lv, L.; Pei, J.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, M.; Fu, Z.F.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Comparison of lncRNA and mRNA expression in mouse brains infected by a wild-type and a lab-attenuated Rabies lyssavirus. J. Gen. Virol. 2021, 102, 001538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Seo, B.J.; Choi, J.; La, H.; Habib, O.; Choi, Y.; Hong, K.; Do, J.T. Role of mitochondrial fission-related genes in mitochondrial morphology and energy metabolism in mouse embryonic stem cells. Redox Biol. 2020, 36, 101599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Stark, R.; Kibbey, R.G. The mitochondrial isoform of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK-M) and glucose homeostasis: Has it been overlooked? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1840, 1313–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hanson, R.W.; Patel, Y.M. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (GTP): The gene and the enzyme. Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 1994, 69, 203–281. [Google Scholar]
  62. Qi, M.; Tan, B.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Liao, S.; Yan, J.; Liu, Y.; Yin, Y. Small intestinal transcriptome analysis revealed changes of genes involved in nutrition metabolism and immune responses in growth retardation piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 3795–3808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Basu Ball, W.; Neff, J.K.; Gohil, V.M. The role of nonbilayer phospholipids in mitochondrial structure and function. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592, 1273–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Leithner, K.; Triebl, A.; Trötzmüller, M.; Hinteregger, B.; Leko, P.; Wieser, B.I.; Grasmann, G.; Bertsch, A.L.; Züllig, T.; Stacher, E.; et al. The glycerol backbone of phospholipids derives from noncarbohydrate precursors in starved lung cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6225–6230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cai, P.; Zheng, H.; She, J.; Feng, N.; Zou, H.; Gu, J.; Yuan, Y.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Bian, J. Molecular mechanism of aflatoxin-induced hepatocellular carcinoma derived from a bioinformatics analysis. Toxins 2020, 12, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Xue, D.; Cheng, Y.; Pang, T.; Kuai, Y.; An, Y.; Wu, K.; Li, Y.; Lai, M.; Wang, B.; Wang, S. Sodium butyrate alleviates deoxynivalenol-induced porcine intestinal barrier disruption by promoting mitochondrial homeostasis via PCK2 signaling. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Summary of the DEGs (DEG; p < 0.05, ≥2.0-fold change) in the porcine jejunum under HS temperature. (A) PCA based on DEGs of the NT and HS groups; (B) volcano plot of HS and NT groups; (C) clustering heatmap of DEGs in HS and NT groups; (D) functional annotation chart of the DEGs in NT and HS groups. NT, normal temperature; HS, heat stress.
Figure 1. Summary of the DEGs (DEG; p < 0.05, ≥2.0-fold change) in the porcine jejunum under HS temperature. (A) PCA based on DEGs of the NT and HS groups; (B) volcano plot of HS and NT groups; (C) clustering heatmap of DEGs in HS and NT groups; (D) functional annotation chart of the DEGs in NT and HS groups. NT, normal temperature; HS, heat stress.
Animals 14 02476 g001
Figure 2. Network analysis of the effect of heat on porcine jejunum in the DEGs of transcriptomic analysis using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING). The network displays the interaction between DEGs based on HS and NT (fold change ≥ 2.0; normalized data (log2) ≥ 4; and p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Network analysis of the effect of heat on porcine jejunum in the DEGs of transcriptomic analysis using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING). The network displays the interaction between DEGs based on HS and NT (fold change ≥ 2.0; normalized data (log2) ≥ 4; and p < 0.05).
Animals 14 02476 g002
Figure 3. Impact of HS on relative mRNA levels in selected genes. * indicates a significance of p < 0.05; ** indicates a significance of p < 0.01. NT, normal temperature; HS, heat stress.
Figure 3. Impact of HS on relative mRNA levels in selected genes. * indicates a significance of p < 0.05; ** indicates a significance of p < 0.01. NT, normal temperature; HS, heat stress.
Animals 14 02476 g003
Figure 4. KEGG pathway of cytoskeleton in muscle cells.
Figure 4. KEGG pathway of cytoskeleton in muscle cells.
Animals 14 02476 g004
Table 1. Primer sequences of genes selected for analysis by real-time PCR.
Table 1. Primer sequences of genes selected for analysis by real-time PCR.
GenePrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Product Size (bp)GenBank No.
ZO1F GGGGCAATCTCAACTCCTGT
R GGTTGTCCAACTTGGGCAT
137XM 021098896.1
CLDN1F TTTCCTCAATACAGGAGGGAAGC
R CCCTCTCCCCACATTCGAG
74NM_001244539.1
CLDN3F GCCAAGATCCTCTACTCCGC
R GAGAGCTGCCTAGCATCTGG
197NM_001160075.1
CLDN4F CTCTCGGACACCTTCCCAAG
R GCAGTGGGGAAGGTCAAAGG
192XM_005661969.2
OCLNF TCTCAGCCAGCGTATTCTTTC
R GCACATCACGATAACGAGCAT
111XM 005672525.3
ACTG2F CCTGGCATTGCCGACAGGAT
R GGCCAGGATAGAGCCTCCGA
123XM_021087371.1
DESF TTCCGAGCGGATGTGGATGC
R CTGAAGCTGGGCCTGCAGTT
135NM_001001535.1
PYGMF GTGGAGATGGCGGAAGAGGC
R TCGATGACGTGCCGAAGCTC
140XM_003122588.5
MYL9F CACCAAGAAGCGGCCACAGA
R TGCCCTCCAGGTACTCGTCC
188NM_001244472.1
MYLKF ATCAGGGAGTCCCGCCACTT
R CTGCTGTGCAGGTGGCTTCT
142XM_001929078.6
PPP1R14AF TGAGCAAGCTGCAGTCTCCG
R CGGTACAGCTCCTCCAAGCG
163NM_214337.1
TPM1F TGAGCTGGTGTCGCTGCAAA
R ATCGGCTTCAGCATCGGTGG
130NM_001097483.2
TPM2F GATGTGGCCTCCCTGAACCG
R TTCTCGGCCTCCTCCAGCTT
103NM_001129947.1
CNN1F GCAGGAGCAGGAGCTTCGAG
R CTGGTGCCAGTTCTGGGTGG
166NM_213878.1
PDLIM3F GCTGGCGGCACTCAGAAGAT
R TTCGCAGTACAGCTCCCCCT
174NM_001001637.1
PDLIM7F AGCAGAATGGACAGCCGCTC
R GAGGATGCGGAAGGAACGGG
122XM_021084391.1
PCP4F GCTGGGGCCACCAATGGAAA
R TGAGACTGAATGGCCACCGC
128XM_021071001.1
PCK1F TGCTCCCGGAACCTCTGTGA
R GGTCGATGATGGGGCACTGG
107NM_001123158.1
PCK2F TCTTTCGGCAGCGGCTATGG
R ACATAGCGCTTCTTCCCCGC
152NM_001161753.1
GAPDHF CCACGGTCCATGCCATCACT
R GCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTG
268XM_021091114.1
Table 2. Information table for DEGs selected.
Table 2. Information table for DEGs selected.
Gene ID Gene NameUniversal Gene Name
100736682ZO1zonula occludens-1
100625166CLDN1claudin 1
431781CLDN3claudin 3
733578CLDN4claudin 4
397236OCLNoccludin
100520667ACTG2actin gamma 2, smooth muscle
396725DESdesmin
733659PYGMglycogen phosphorylase
100157760MYL9myosin light chain 9
396848MYLKmyosin light chain kinase
397610PPP1R14Aprotein phosphatase 1 regulatory inhibitor subunit 14A
100037999TPM1tropomyosin 1
396693TPM2tropomyosin 2
396911CNN1calponin 1
414421PDLIM3PDZ and LIM domain 3
100624749PDLIM7PDZ and LIM domain 7
110256491PCP4Purkinje cell protein 4
100144531PCK1phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1
403165PCK2phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, Y.; Park, H.; Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Kim, M. Heat Stress Induces Alterations in Gene Expression of Actin Cytoskeleton and Filament of Cellular Components Causing Gut Disruption in Growing–Finishing Pigs. Animals 2024, 14, 2476. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172476

AMA Style

Choi Y, Park H, Kim J, Lee H, Kim M. Heat Stress Induces Alterations in Gene Expression of Actin Cytoskeleton and Filament of Cellular Components Causing Gut Disruption in Growing–Finishing Pigs. Animals. 2024; 14(17):2476. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172476

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Yohan, Hyunju Park, Joeun Kim, Hyunseo Lee, and Minju Kim. 2024. "Heat Stress Induces Alterations in Gene Expression of Actin Cytoskeleton and Filament of Cellular Components Causing Gut Disruption in Growing–Finishing Pigs" Animals 14, no. 17: 2476. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172476

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop