Next Article in Journal
Pathologic Changes in and Immunophenotyping of Polymyositis in the Dutch Kooiker Dog
Previous Article in Journal
Histomorphological and Dynamical Changes in Female River Lampreys during Maturation under Controlled Conditions as a Part of Lamprey Restoration Programs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 14
Issue 17
10.3390/ani14172517
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diversity and Interactions between Picobiine Mites and Starlings

by
Bozena Sikora
1,
Jakub Z. Kosicki
2,
Milena Patan
1,
Iva Marcisova
3,
Martin Hromada
3 and
Maciej Skoracki
1,*
1
Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
2
Department of Avian Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61-614 Poznań, Poland
3
Laboratory and Museum of Evolutionary Ecology, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Humanities and Natural Sciences, University of Prešov, 08001 Prešov, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(17), 2517; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172517
Submission received: 7 August 2024 / Revised: 23 August 2024 / Accepted: 28 August 2024 / Published: 29 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diversity and Interactions Between Mites and Vertebrates)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study investigates the complex interactions between quill mites of the family Syringophilidae and starlings. We identified five species of quill mites infesting 24 species of starlings, uncovering intricate host–parasite dynamics across the Palaearctic, Afrotropical, Oriental, and Oceanian zoogeographical regions. A detailed statistical analysis of the Picobiinae–Sturnidae network revealed low connectivity but high modularity, indicating specific relationships between the mites and their starling hosts. The network structure demonstrated four distinct modules, highlighting the specialised and compartmentalised characteristics of these associations. Furthermore, the distribution of Picobia mites was found to align with the phylogeny of their starling hosts, with particular mites targeting specific starling clades. The social and breeding behaviours of starlings were observed to contribute to the high prevalence of these mites. This comprehensive network analysis provides new insights into the ecological dynamics of host–parasite interactions.

Abstract

The subfamily Picobiinae (Acariformes: Syringophilidae) comprises obligate and permanent parasites of birds found exclusively in the quills of contour feathers. We studied associations of picobiine mites with birds of the family Sturnidae (Aves: Passeriformes) across the Palaearctic, Afrotropical, Oriental, and Oceanian zoogeographical regions. Among the 414 examined bird individuals belonging to 44 species (35.2% of all sturnids), 103 individuals from 24 species (54.5% of examined species) were parasitised by quill mites. The diversity of mites was represented by five species, including one newly described, Picobia malayi Patan and Skoracki sp. n. Statistical analysis of the Picobiinae–Sturnidae bipartite network demonstrated a low connectance value (Con = 0.20) and high modularity, with significant differences in the H2′ specialisation index compared to null model values. The network structure, characterised by four distinct modules, highlighted the specificity and limited host range of the Picobiinae–Sturnidae associations. The distribution of Picobia species among starlings was congruent with the phylogeny of their hosts, with different mites parasitising specific clades of starlings. Additionally, the findings suggest that the social and breeding behaviours of starlings influence quite a high prevalence. Finally, our studies support the validity of museum collections to study these parasitic interactions.

1. Introduction

The subfamily Picobiinae, established by Johnston and Kethley in 1973, comprises obligate and permanent parasites of birds, exclusively found in the quills of contour feathers covering the head, neck, breast, abdomen, and back of their avian hosts [1,2]. An exception within this subfamily is Calamincola lobatus Casto, 1977, a unique species belonging to a monotypic genus, which inhabits the quills of wing feathers of the Groove-billed Ani, Crotophaga sulcirostris Swainson (Cuculiformes: Cuculiudae) [3]. Within the quills, picobiines feed on soft tissue fluid by piercing the quill wall with their long needle-like chelicerae [4,5]. The entire life cycle of these mites occurs within the quills, from larva through two nymphal stages (protonymph and deutonymph) to adults. The dispersal stage involves adult and fertilised females, which seek new feathers to infest, either on the same host individual or through vertical transmission from parent to chick [4,6,7].
Picobiines form associations exclusively with neognathous birds (Neognathae), spreading across 10 different orders [8,9]. Each avian order typically hosts a unique picobiine genus. For example, birds of the order Columbiformes are infested by Gunabopicobia, Galliformes by Columbiphilus, Cuculiformes by Calamincola, and Charadriiformes by Charadriineopicobia. In contrast, other bird orders host multiple picobiine genera. Among bird orders, the most diverse picobiine mite fauna is found in Passeriformes, the most species-rich avian order, which is infested by representatives of five genera: Neopicobia, Picobia, Phipicobia, Pipicobia, and Rafapicobia [10,11,12]. Similarly, the order Psittaciformes hosts members of the four genera: Lawrencipicobia, Rafapicobia, Neopicobia, and Pipicobia [13,14]. This highlights the great diversity within this parasitic mite subfamily.
Since the early 2000s, research has significantly expanded our understanding of picobiine diversity, with numerous new species and genera being described. Comprehensive reviews of picobiine fauna have been conducted across various zoogeographic regions, covering all except Antarctica (see references in [8]). Currently, the subfamily Picobiinae comprises 116 species grouped into 12 genera [8,9,15]. Due to the vast diversity of these mites, their wide host range, and the many avian hosts yet to be studied, current research represents only the beginning of uncovering the full extent of picobiine fauna.
The largest avian order, Passeriformes, comprises more than 6200 extant species grouped into over 1350 genera and 140 families [16]. The research presented here continues large-scale studies focusing on quill mites across particular families within the order Passeriformes.
The family Sturnidae (Starlings) includes approximately 125 species grouped into 36 genera [17,18]. Starlings are medium-sized birds that adapt to various habitats, including dry savannas, scrublands, farmlands, grasslands, urban areas, and forests in temperate and tropical climates [17]. These birds are found in the Palaearctic, Afrotropical, Oriental, and Oceanian zoogeographical regions [16]. Starlings are social birds with often nomadic habits, assembling in huge flocks. Some species breed in colonies, which can be very large (even tens of thousands of pairs). They mostly breed in cavities, but some species also place their nests in the open. Their evolutionary success can be attributed to their high degree of dispersal. Cooperative breeding is also found in many sturnid species [16]. All these traits make starlings very interesting as hosts of highly specific quill mites, including picobiines. Unfortunately, our understanding of quill mites parasitising this avian family remains incomplete. To date, three species of the genus Picobia Heller, 1880, have been described from this host group [19,20,21].
The current study has the following objectives: first, it describes a new species of the genus Picobia, and second, it aims to detail the diversity, interactions, and level of specialisation between syringophilid ectoparasites and their starling hosts on a worldwide scale.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Host Sampling

The mite material used in this paper was collected from dry bird skins primarily housed in the ornithological collection of the Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (SNSB-ZSM) in Munich, Germany. Additionally, the Eurasian Starling (Sturnus vulgaris) was examined at the Icelandic Institute of Natural History (IINH) in Reykjavik, Iceland, and the Superb Starling (Lamprotornis superbus) was examined in the Ornithology Section of the National Museum of Kenya (NMK) in Nairobi, Kenya. Approximately 10 contour feathers were removed from each bird specimen, specifically from the area near the cloaca.

2.2. Mites Preparation, Identification, and Depository

All collected feathers were examined under a stereomicroscope and opened using fine forceps. Infested feathers were placed in tubes with Nesbitt’s solution at room temperature for 3 days, following the protocol introduced by Walter and Krantz [22] and Skoracki [11]. Subsequently, mites were mounted on microscope slides in Hoyer’s medium [22]. Identifications and drawings of mite specimens were conducted using an Olympus BX51 light microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan) with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. Figures were prepared using a camera lucida attachment. In the descriptions, all measurements are provided in micrometers; the dimension ranges of the paratypes are provided in parentheses, following the data from the holotype. The idiosomal setation follows Grandjean [23] as adapted for Prostigmata by Kethley [24]. The nomenclature of leg chaetotaxy follows that proposed by Grandjean [25]. The morphological terminology follows Kethley [1] and Skoracki et al. [8]. The abbreviations PF and NPF are used for the physogastric and non-physogastric forms of the females, respectively.
Mite specimens are curated at the following repositories, abbreviated as AMU for the Department of Animal Morphology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland, and SNSB-ZSM for the Section Arthropoda Varia, Bavarian State Collection for Zoology, Munich, Germany.
The list with full data of the collected mite material is presented in Supplementary Materials.

2.3. Bird Systematics and Zoogeographical Regions

The scientific names and systematics of the birds follow Clements et al. [18] and Winkler et al. [17]. Zoogeographical regions follow Holt et al. [26] and Ficetola et al. [27].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

To describe patterns within the studied host–parasite ecological two-way web, the “bipartite” package for R was used [28]. This approach allows for a quantitative description of the ecological connections between parasites and their hosts [29]. In our matrix, parasite prevalence was utilised as a quantitative index. Descriptive statistics were computed utilising Quantitative Parasitology v.3.0 on the Web [30,31,32].
First, we calculated connectance (connection ratio) in a bipartite network. This measure determines the ratio of the number of actual connections in the netDwork to the maximum possible number of connections. It indicates network density and is expressed as a value between 0 and 1, where 1 means that every possible element from one part of the network (parasites) is connected to every element from the other part of the network (hosts) and 0 means that there are no connections. Next, we calculated the C.score, a measure describing the tendency towards non-co-occurrence of species pairs. A high value of this index indicates a tendency for species to not co-occur, suggesting competition or other forms of mutual avoidance. Conversely, a low C.score indicates that species tend to co-occur more often than expected based on random distribution. To determine whether parasites are generalists or specialists, we used the H2′ measure. This statistic ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates that all species are generalists (interacting with many hosts), and 1 indicates that all species are specialists (each species only interacts with one host). The null.t.test was employed to check whether the observed H2′ values significantly deviated from random values [33]. We also calculated nestedness, which is a measure of order in the network. If parasites with a low number of interactions with hosts share these interactions with other hosts with a larger number of interactions, the network is considered nested. Nestedness temperature measures how much the actual nestedness of a network differs from a perfectly nested network. For a perfectly nested network, the temperature would be 0. A higher temperature indicates less perfect nesting. As a measure of the functional diversity of parasites, we used d′ and d. The d′ is normalised to the maximum possible diversity for a particular species in the network, ranging from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating maximum functional diversity. If d′ for a species is 1, it means that it has maximum functional diversity, indicating that its interactions with other species are very diverse and unique compared to other species in the network. The d is a raw measure of functional diversity based on functional distances between species. High d values suggest a greater diversity of parasites in their interactions with hosts. Finally, we calculated modularity as a probability value that measures how well the modular structure fits the data. A value close to 1 indicates that the modular model has a relatively good fit for the observed data, suggesting that modularity is a significant feature of this network.

3. Results

3.1. Systematics

In our study, we identified five mite species of the subfamily Picobiinae parasitising 24 starling species (Table 1). Below, we present a list of the mite species along with their hosts and distribution, including new records. At the end of this section, we have constructed a key to all picobiine species associated with birds of the family Sturnidae.

3.1.1. Picobia malayi Patan and Skoracki sp. n. (Figure 1 and Figure 2)

Female. Gnathosoma. Hypostomal apex with pair of blunt-ended projections. Peritremes V-shaped, each medial branch with seven chambers, each lateral branch with seven or eight clearly visible and striated chambers. Stylophore 300 (295–310) long, exposed portion of stylophore apunctate, 180 (175–190) long. Movable cheliceral digit 260 (260–270) long. Idiosoma. Propodontal shield divided into two narrow lateral sclerites and triangular medial sclerite; lateral sclerites punctate between bases of setae ve and si, bearing bases of setae ve, si and se, medial sparsely punctate. Setae vi and ve situated on same transverse level. Setae c1 situated slightly anterior to level of setae se or both pair of setae set on the same level. Propodontal setae vi, ve and si beaded. Pygidial shield well developed and large in size, apunctate. Setae h1 approximately 5.5 times longer than f1; setae f2 about twice as long as f1. Bases of agenital setae ag2 situated postero-lateral to setae ag1. Genital plate present, apunctate. Genital lobes absent. Pseudanal setae ps1 and ps2 subequal in length. All coxal fields well developed and apunctate. Legs. Antaxial and paraxial members of claws equal in size and shape. Lengths of setae: vi (170–195), ve 160 (130), si (200–230), se 310 (270–305) c1 290 (255–295), c2 305 (275–315), d1 165 (140–160), d2 290 (275–305), e2 180 (170–175), f1 65 (50–60), f2 110 (100–130), h1 355 (310–375), h2 (590–610), ag1 95 (75–100), ag2 35 (30–40), ag3 180 (170–200), g1 30 (30–40), ps1 25 (25–30), ps2 25 (20–30), l′RIII 35 (30), l′RIV 30 (25–30), 3b 40 (30), 3c 150 (115–140), 4b 35 (35–45), 4c 150 (145–165).
Male. Not found.
Animals 14 02517 g001
Figure 1. Picobia malayi Patan and Skoracki sp. n., female. (A)—dorsal view; (B)—ventral view.
Figure 1. Picobia malayi Patan and Skoracki sp. n., female. (A)—dorsal view; (B)—ventral view.
Animals 14 02517 g001
Animals 14 02517 g002
Figure 2. Picobia malayi Patan and Skoracki sp. n., female. (A)—hypostomal apex; (B)—peritreme; (C)—propodonotal seta si; (D)—genito-anal region in ventral view; (E)—tarsus III with claws.
Figure 2. Picobia malayi Patan and Skoracki sp. n., female. (A)—hypostomal apex; (B)—peritreme; (C)—propodonotal seta si; (D)—genito-anal region in ventral view; (E)—tarsus III with claws.
Animals 14 02517 g002

Type Material

Female holotype (NPF) and paratypes: six females (PF) and two females (NPF) from three specimens of the Common Hill Myna, Gracula religiosa Linnaeus, Indonesia, Malay Archipelago, Sumatra, 1908 (host specimens at SNSB-ZSM, uncatalogued). Mites removed by B. Sikora and M. Skoracki.

Type Material Deposition

Holotype and most of paratypes deposited in the AMU (reg. no. AMU MS 21-0910-059, 061, 089), except one female (PF) and one female (NPF) paratypes in the SNSB-ZSM.

Additional Material

Six females (NPF) and seven females (PF) (reg. no. AMU MS 21-0910-052) from the White-necked Myna, Streptocitta albicollis (Vieillot) (host at SNSB-ZSM, uncatalogued), Indonesia, Malay Archipelago, Celebes Isl., 1875, coll. Riedel. One female (NPF) and one female (PF) (reg no. AMU MS 21-0910-054) from the Coleto, Sarcops calvus (Linnaeus) (host reg. no. SNSB-ZSM 26.213), Philippines, Cebu Island, 1879, coll. Burger. One female (PF) (reg no. AMU MS 21-0910-056) from the same host species (host reg. no. SNSB-ZSM 26.213), Philippines, Luzon Island, Manila, 1963, coll. I. Marschdii (host at SNSB-ZSM, uncatalogued).

Differential Diagnosis

Picobia malayi sp. n. is morphologically similar to Picobia indonesiana Skoracki and Glowska, 2008. In females of both species, the hypostomal apex is with a pair of blunt-ended projections; each lateral branch of the peritremes has a similar number (seven or eight) of chambers; the propodonotal shield is divided into three sclerites (two lateral and unpaired medial); setae h2 are distinctly longer than f1; the bases of setae ag2 are situated postero-lateral to ag1. This new species is easily distinguishable from P. indonesiana by the following features: in females of P. malayi, each medial branch of the peritremes has seven chambers; the stylophore is 295–310 long; setae h1 are 5.5 times longer than f1. In females of P. indonesiana, each medial branch of the peritremes has four or five chambers; the stylophore is 205 long; setae h1 are about twice as long as f1.

Etymology

The specific epithet “malayi” originates from the Malay Archipelago, indicating the geographic region where the birds that act as hosts for this parasite species are found.

3.1.2. Picobia indonesiana Skoracki and Glowska, 2008

Hosts and distribution. The Singing Starling Aplonis cantoroides (Gray) from Indonesia (Misool Isl.), the Long-tailed Starling Aplonis magna (Schlegel) from Indonesia (Numfor Isl.), the Metallic Starling Aplonis metallica (Temminck) from Papua New Guinea and Indonesia (Misool Isl.), the Asian Glossy Starling Aplonis panayensis (Scopoli) from Indonesia (Sangir, Sumatra and Java) and India [34] (current study), the Fiery-browed Starling Enodes erythrophris (Temminck) from Indonesia [34], the Golden Myna Mino anais (Lesson) from Papua New Guinea (current study), and the Yellow-faced Myna Mino dumontii (Lesson) from Indonesia [34] and Papua New Guinea (current study).

3.1.3. Picobia lamprotornis Klimovicova, Skoracki, Wamiti and Hromada, 2014

Hosts and distribution. The Greater Blue-eared Glossy Starling Lamprotornis chalybaeus Hemprich and Ehrenberg from Tanzania and Kenya, the Lesser Blue-eared Glossy-Starling Lamprotornis chloropterus Swainson from Tanzania [21], the Superb Starling Lamprotornis superbus Rüppell from Kenya [19,21], the Abbott’s Starling Poeoptera femoralis (Richmond) from Tanzania, and the Kenrick’s Starling Poeoptera kenricki Shelley from Tanzania [35].

3.1.4. Picobia sturni Skoracki, Bochkov and Wauthy, 2004

Hosts and distribution. The Crested Myna Acridotheres cristatellus (Linnaeus) from China, the Jungle Myna Acridotheres fuscus (Wagler) from Nepal, the Common Myna Acridotheres tristis (Linnaeus) from India (current study), the Wattled Starling Creatophora cinerea (Meuschen) from Kenya and Tanzania [35] (current study), the White-cheeked Starling Spodiopsar cineraceus (Temminck) from Japan and China [11] (current study), the Red-billed Starling Spodiopsar sericeus (Gmelin) from China (current study), the Spotless Starling Sturnus unicolor Temminck from Morocco [8], Italy and Spain (current study), the Eurasian Starling Sturnus vulgaris Linnaeus from Poland, Moldova [20,36], Slovakia [11], Iceland, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and China (current study).

3.1.5. Picobia wisniewskii Patan, Skoracki and Marcisova, 2024

Hosts and distribution. The Red-winged Starling Onychognathus morio (Linnaeus) from Tanzania [35] and the Bristle-crowned Starling Onychognathus salvadorii Sharpe from Ethiopia (current study).

3.1.6. Key to the Species of the Picobiine Mites (Females) Associated with Starlings

1. Opisthonotal setae h1 distinctly longer than f1. Genital lobes absent … 2
–Opisthonotal setae h1 and f1 subequal in length. Genital lobes present … 3
2. Setae h1 5.5 times longer than f1 … P. malayi sp. n.
–Setae h1 twice as long as f1 … P. indonesiana
3. Genital lobes weakly developed and blunt-ended … 4
–Genital lobes well-developed and sharp-ended … P. sturni
4. Medial sclerite of propodonotal shield is punctate. Length of stylophore 235–240.
Lengths of setae c2 and d2 230–240 and 230–240, respectively … P. wisniewskii
–Medial sclerite of propodonotal shield is apunctate. Length of stylophore 195–200.
Lengths of setae c2 and d2 175–180 and 165–190, respectively … P. lamprotornis

3.2. Prevalence

Among the 414 examined bird individuals belonging to 44 species (35.2% of all sturnid species), 103 individuals from 24 species (54.5% of examined species) were parasitised by quill mites (Table 2). The species richness of quill mites associated with Starlings is represented by five species, including a new species described above. The prevalence varied considerably, ranging from 5.9% to 100% for particular avian species, and the confidence intervals were wide, ranging from 0.3 to 100. The examined avian material included 11 uninfested host species (N = 59) (Table 3).

3.3. Statistical Analysis

The Picobiinae–Sturnidae bipartite network (Figure 3) exhibited a low connectance value (Con = 0.20). This result is also confirmed by a C-score = 1, H2′ specialisation index = 1. A comparison between H2′ and null model values revealed significant differences (mean H2′ for null model = 0.028, t = −678.68, p < 0.0001). The temperature of nestedness = 44.45. The normalised specialisation level (d′) (maximum functional diversity) in all cases = 1. The non-normalised value of d index for Picobia lamprotornis (d = 1.96), Picobia malayi (d = 1.67), Picobia sturni (d = 1.61), and Picobia indonesiana (d = 1.14), Picobia wisniewskii (d = 1.86). We observed very high modularity in our network (likelihood = 0.77), within which we identified four modules, each containing hosts ranging from three to eight (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

In our studies, we found that, among the representatives of the subfamily Picobiinae, starlings are parasitized exclusively by those of the genus Picobia. This genus belongs to the Picobia-generic group and is the most species-rich genus in the family Picobiinae, with 45 described species [9,15]. Most species of this genus are associated with birds of the order Passeriformes (41 species), while a smaller number of Picobia species have been recorded from non-passeriform birds, such as Piciformes (three species) and Bucerotiformes (one species). Due to the numerous associations of the genus Picobia with passerine hosts, discovering representatives of this genus on starlings is not unexpected. More interestingly, the distribution of different Picobia species parasitising birds of the family Sturnidae shows a highly congruent pattern with the phylogeny of their hosts [37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
The clade of jungle starlings from the Indo–Pacific Islands region is a deep branch in sturnid phylogeny [16]. The recent distribution of these ancestral lineages indicates that the evolutionary origin of Sturnidae is possibly in Southeast Asia, perhaps towards the Southwestern Pacific [44]. Infested members of this host lineage are parasitised by Picobia malayi (on Gracula, Strepsocitta, and Sarcops) and P. indonesiana (on Enodes, Mino, and species of diverse island radiation of genus Aplonis). The main group of starlings, which is widespread in savanna and woodland regions in the Old World, is divided into crown radiations of Eurasian Savanna Starlings and African Starlings. All members of the Eurasian clade in our dataset, e.g., Sturnus, Spodiopsar, and Acridotheres, but also Creatophora (whose native range is in East and South Africa), are parasitised by Picobia sturni. Finally, the lineage of African Starlings, sister to Eurasian Savannah Starlings, was split into two distinct lineages [16]. The clade of African Red-winged Starlings of genus Onychognathus is parasitised by Picobia wisniewskii, while African Glossy Starlings (represented by Lamprotornis, Poeoptera in our data) are parasitised by Picobia lapmrotornis. It can be assumed that representatives of individual Picobia species were already present in the ancestors of specific clades of Sturnidae.
Currently, most picobiine mites are treated as monoxenous parasites (56% of all species), inhabiting only one host species. Oligoxenous, or mesostenoxenous species, which live on hosts within a single genus or family, comprise 18% and 22% of the picobiine species, respectively. Only a small fraction (4%) is metastenoxenous, associating with hosts across multiple families but restricted to a single avian order [8]. To date, we do not have records of mite species switching between representatives of different bird orders. The mite species associated with starlings can be classified as narrow oligoxenous parasites, such as P. wisniewskii, which is found on birds of the genus Onychognathus, and mesostenoxenous parasites, which include all other mite species, i.e., P. indonesiana, P. malayi, P. sturni, and P. lamprotornis, inhabiting birds from different genera. However, all of these species are specific to a particular phylogenetic clade of Sturnidae.
The Picobiinae–Sturnidae bipartite network (Figure 3) exhibited a low connectance value (Con = 0.25). This means that only 25% of all possible connections between picobiines and starlings are observed. This result is also confirmed by a C-score = 1, indicating that picobiines associated with this group of birds exhibit complete non-co-occurrence. Consequently, it is not surprising that the H2′ specialisation index is also 1, showing that picobiines are highly specialised and do not interact with each other. The temperature of nestedness, 54.49, indicates the moderate internal organisation of the network. The normalised specialisation level (d′) (maximum functional diversity) in all cases was 1, meaning that each of these parasite species has unique ways of interacting with hosts in the network. However, the non-normalised value of this index, “d”, was highest for Picobia wisniewskii (d = 1.86) and Picobia lamprotornis (d = 1.79), indicating that these species have the greatest diversity in host interactions compared to other species within this taxon (P. malayi d = 1.51, P. sturni d = 1.44, and P. indonesiana d = 0.97). As a result, we observed very high modularity in our network, identifying five distinct modules (Figure 4), each comprising hosts ranging from two to eight.
The present studies on the prevalence of infestation show a relatively high rate, with few species where prevalence is below 20% (Table 1). This rate can be correlated with the highly social behaviour of the family Sturnidae, cooperative breeding, and the fact that most species are cavity breeders [16]. It is worth noting that many of the studies of quill mites were conducted on museum skins in various collections. In such circumstances, whole quill mite populations remain enclosed in the calamus cavity of the feather quill, where they can be investigated even after many decades. Thus, one could ask—is it possible to consider such encapsulated population studies comparable with field studies performed on wild host populations? In this study, conducted entirely in museum avian collections, we found a prevalence of Sturnus vulgaris of 21.2% (all seasons pooled, different countries in the Palaearctic, see Table 3). Skoracki et al. [36] found in a study of S. vulgaris conducted in Poland (during the spring season) that the prevalence was 28.98%. These values do not differ significantly from each other (Fisher exact test, two-tailed p = 0.29), suggesting that population studies of quill mites performed in museum collections can be comparable to investigations in the field.

5. Conclusions

This study reveals the highly specialised and phylogenetically congruent nature of the interactions between quill mites of the subfamily Picobiinae and their starling hosts. We identified five species of quill mites parasitising 24 starling species, highlighting the narrow host specificity and significant specialisation within the Picobiinae–Sturnidae bipartite network. The low connectance value and high modularity of the network underscore the distinct and specialised nature of these host–parasite relationships. Our findings show that Picobia species exhibit a distribution pattern congruent with the phylogeny of their starling hosts, supporting the idea of co-evolution between mites and starlings. The high prevalence of mites is influenced by the social and breeding behaviours of starlings, which facilitate parasite transfers. Overall, this study enhances our understanding of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of quill mites and starlings, emphasising the importance of specialisation and phylogenetic congruence in shaping these intricate relationships. Future research could further explore genetic mechanisms underlying host specificity and examine how environmental changes impact these specialised interactions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani14172517/s1, Material examined.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.S., J.Z.K., M.P., I.M., M.H., and M.S.; methodology, B.S., M.P., and M.S.; validation, B.S., M.P., and M.S.; formal analysis, B.S., J.Z.K., M.P., and M.S.; investigation, B.S., J.Z.K., M.P., I.M., M.H., and M.S.; material collection, M.S., M.P., and B.S. data curation, M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.S., J.Z.K., M.P., I.M., M.H., and M.S.; writing—review and editing, M.S. and M.P.; visualisation, M.S., J.Z.K., and M.P.; supervision, M.S.; project administration, B.S., M.P., M.H., and M.S.; funding acquisition, B.S., M.P., M.H., and M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the AMU Excellence Initiative—Research University, grant no. 118/34/UAM/0056 (to M.P.); the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract APVV-22-0440 (to M.S., I.M. and M.H.); the Agency of the Ministry of Education, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic and Slovak Academy of Sciences 1/0876/21 (to M.S., J.Z.K., I.M., M.H., and B.S); the Excellence Initiative Program “Mobility” of the UAM Research University—UAM ID-UB 094/07/POB1/0013 (to M.S.) and UAM UD-UB 094/07/POB1/0012 (to B.S.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The ethic was not applied. The research was conducted solely and exclusively on dry bird skins deposited in the ornithological collection of the museum.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All necessary data are available in the text and the supplement for this article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Markus Unsöld (Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Munich, Germany) for making available samples of feathers for the present study. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their critical review of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kethley, J.B. A revision of the family Syringophilidae (Prostigmata: Acarina). Contrib. Am. Entomol. Inst. 1970, 6, 1–76. [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnston, D.E.; Kethley, J.B. A numerical phenetic study of the quill mites of the family Syringophilidae (Acari). J. Parasitol. 1973, 59, 520–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Casto, S.D. Cuculiphilus lobatus gen. n., sp. n. representing a new subfamily of quill mites (Acarina: Syringophilidae) from the Groove-billed ani Crotophaga sulcirostris (Cuculiformes: Cuculidae). Southwest Nat. 1977, 22, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kethley, J.B. Population regulation in quill mites (Acari: Syringophilidae). Ecology 1971, 52, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Filimonova, S.A.; Mironov, S.V. Functional morphology of the gnathosoma in the quill mite Syringophilopsis fringilla Fritsch (Acari: Prostigmata: Syringohpilidae). Zool. Anz. 2010, 249, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Casto, S.D. Quill wall thickness and feeding of Syringophiloidus minor (Berlese) (Acarina: Syringophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1974, 67, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Casto, S.D. Entry and exit of syringophilid mites (Acarina: Syringophilidae) from the lumen of the quill. Wilson Bull. 1974, 86, 272–278. [Google Scholar]
  8. Skoracki, M.; Sikora, B.; Spicer, G.S. A review of the subfamily Picobiinae Johnston and Kethley, 1973 (Acariformes: Prostigmata: Syringophilidae). Zootaxa 2016, 4113, 1–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Skoracki, M.; Sikora, B.; Jerzak, L.; Hromada, M. Tanopicobia gen. nov., a new genus of quill mites, its phylogenetic placement in the subfamily Picobiinae (Acariformes: Syringophilidae) and picobiine relationships with avian hosts. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0225982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fain, A.; Bochkov, A.V.; Mironov, S.V. New genera and species of quill mites of the family Syringophilidae (Acari: Prostigmata). Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg. 2000, 70, 33–70. [Google Scholar]
  11. Skoracki, M. Quill mites (Acari: Syringophilidae) of the Palaearctic region. Zootaxa 2011, 2840, 1–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Glowska, E.; Schmidt, B.K. New quill mites (Cheyletoidea: Syringophilidae) parasitising the black-headed paradise flycatcher Terpsiphone rufiventer (Passeriformes: Monarchidae) in Gabon. Zootaxa 2014, 3786, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Skoracki, M.; Hromada, M. A review of picobiine mites (Acari: Syringophilidae: Picobiinae) parasitising African birds. Folia Parasitol. 2013, 60, 192–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Marciniak-Musial, N.; Skoracki, M.; Kosicki, J.Z.; Unsöld, M.; Sikora, B. Host-parasite relationships of quill mites (Syringophilidae) and parrots (Psittaciformes). Diversity 2023, 15, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zmudzinski, M.; Skoracki, M.; Sikora, B. An Updated Checklist of Quill Mites of the Family Syringophilidae (Acariformes: Prostigmata). 2023. Available online: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/An_updated_checklist_of_quill_mites_of_the_family_Syringophilidae_Acariformes_Prostigmata_/16529574 (accessed on 3 July 2024).
  16. Fjeldså, J.; Christidis, L.; Ericson, P.G.P. The Largest Avian Radiation: The Evolution of Perching Birds, or the Order Passeriformes; Lynx Edicions: Barcelona, Spain, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Winkler, D.W.; Billerman, S.M.; Lovette, I.J. Starlings (Sturnidae), version 1.0. In Birds of the World; Billerman, S.M., Keeney, B.K., Rodewald, P.G., Schulenberg, T.S., Eds.; Cornell Lab of Ornithology: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. Clements, J.F.; Rasmussen, P.C.; Schulenberg, T.S.; Iliff, M.J.; Fredericks, T.A.; Gerbracht, J.A.; Lepage, D.; Spencer, A.; Billerman, S.M.; Sullivan, B.L.; et al. The eBird/Clements Checklist of Birds of the World. 2023. Available online: https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ (accessed on 3 July 2024).
  19. Klimovicova, M.; Skoracki, M.; Wamiti, W.; Hromada, M. Quill mites of the subfamily Picobiinae (Acari: Syringophilidae) parasitising African birds, with description of two new species. Folia Parasitol. 2014, 61, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Skoracki, M.; Bochkov, A.V.; Wauthy, G. Revision of the quill mites of the genus Picobia Haller, 1878 (Acari: Syringophilidae) with notes on their host-parasites relationships. Insect Syst. Evol. 2004, 35, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Skoracki, M.; Patan, M.; Unsoeld, M.; Hromada, M.; Kwieciński, Z.; Marcisova, I. Diversity of Quill Mites of the Family Syringophilidae (Acariformes: Prostigmata) Parasitizing Starlings of the Genus Lamprotornis (Passeriformes: Sturnidae). Diversity 2024, 16, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Walter, D.E.; Krantz, G.W. Collecting, rearing, and preparing specimens. In A Manual of Acarology; Krantz, G.W., Walter, D.E., Eds.; Texas Tech University Press: Lubbock, TX, USA, 2009; pp. 83–96. [Google Scholar]
  23. Grandjean, F. Les segments postlarvaires de l’hysterosoma chez les oribates (Acariens). Bull. Soc. Zool. Fr. 1939, 64, 273–284. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kethley, J.B. Acarina: Prostigmata (Actinedida). In Soil Biology Guide; Dindal, D.L., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 667–756. [Google Scholar]
  25. Grandjean, F. Observations sure les Acariens de la famille des Stigmaeidae. Archiv. Sci. Phys. Nat. 1944, 26, 103–131. [Google Scholar]
  26. Holt, B.G.; Lessard, J.P.; Borregaard, M.K.; Fritz, S.A.; Araújo, M.B.; Dimitrov, D.; Fabre, P.H.; Graham, C.H.; Graves, G.R.; Jønsson, K.A.; et al. An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 2013, 339, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ficetola, G.; Mazel, F.; Thuiller, W. Global determinants of zoogeographical boundaries. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 0089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dormann, F.; Gruber, B.; Fründ, J. Introducing the bipartite package: Analysing ecological networks. Interaction 2008, 1, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dormann, C.F.; Strauss, R. A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reiczigel, J.; Rozsa, L.; Reiczigel, A.; Fabian, I. Quantitative Parasitology (QPweb). 2013. Available online: https://www2.univet.hu/qpweb/qp10/index.php (accessed on 3 July 2024).
  31. Rozsa, L.; Reiczigel, J.; Majoros, G. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. J. Parasitol. 2000, 86, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reiczigel, J.; Marozzi, M.; Fábián, I.; Rózsa, L. Biostatistics for parasitologists—A primer to Quantitative Parasitology. Trends Parasitol. 2019, 35, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dormann, C.F.; Fründ, J.; Blüthgen, N.; Gruber, B. Indices, graphs and null models: Analysing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol. J. 2009, 2, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Skoracki, M.; Glowska, E. Two new species of the genus Picobia Haller (Acari: Syringophilidae) from Australian and Indonesian passeriform birds. N. Z. J. Zool. 2008, 35, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Patan, M.; Skoracki, M.; Marcisova, I.; Hromada, M.; Sikora, B. Picobiinae mites (Acariformes: Syringophilidae) parasitising the Starlings (Passeriformes: Sturnidae) in the Afrotropical region. Ann. Zool. 2024, 3. (in press). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Skoracki, M.; Michalik, J.; Sikora, B. Prevalence and habitat preference of quill mites (Acari, Syringophilidae) parasitising forest passerine birds in Poland. Acta Parasitol. 2010, 55, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lovette, I.J.; Rubenstein, D.R. A comprehensive molecular phylogeny of the starlings (Aves: Sturnidae) and mockingbirds (Aves: Mimidae): Congruent mtDNA and nuclear trees for a cosmopolitan avian radiation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 44, 1031–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Barker, F.K.; Cibois, A.; Schikler, P.; Cracraft, J. Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 11040–11045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Voelker, G.; Spellman, G.M. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA evidence of polyphyly in the avian superfamily Muscicapoidea. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 30, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ericson, P.G.P.; Johansson, U.S. Phylogeny of Passerida (Aves: Passeriformes) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 126–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cibois, A.; Cracraft, J. Assessing the passerine ‘‘Tapestry’’: Phylogenetic relationships of the Muscicapoidea inferred from nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2004, 32, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sibley, C.G.; Ahlquist, J.E. The relationships of the starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnini) and the mockingbirds (Sturnidae: Mimini). Auk 1984, 101, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sibley, C.G.; Monroe, B.L. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zuccon, D.; Cibois, A.; Pasquet, E.; Ericson, P.G.P. Nuclear and Mitochondrial Sequence Data Reveal the Major Lineages of Starlings, Mynas and Related Taxa. Mol. Phylo. Evol. 2006, 41, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 14 02517 g003
Figure 3. Bipartite network graph of interactions between Picobiine mites (left) and their Starling hosts (right).
Figure 3. Bipartite network graph of interactions between Picobiine mites (left) and their Starling hosts (right).
Animals 14 02517 g003
Animals 14 02517 g004
Figure 4. Modules of the Picobiine mites—Starlings communities. The intensity of the colour of each square indicates the strength of the interaction between particular parasite species (horizontal axis) and their host species (vertical axis).
Figure 4. Modules of the Picobiine mites—Starlings communities. The intensity of the colour of each square indicates the strength of the interaction between particular parasite species (horizontal axis) and their host species (vertical axis).
Animals 14 02517 g004
Table 1. Quill mite species of the subfamily Picobiinae (fam. Syringophilidae) parasitising starlings. (*)—type host species. Abbreviations for zoogeographical regions: Afro—Afrotropical, Orie—Oriental, Ocea—Oceanian, Pala—Palaearctic.
Table 1. Quill mite species of the subfamily Picobiinae (fam. Syringophilidae) parasitising starlings. (*)—type host species. Abbreviations for zoogeographical regions: Afro—Afrotropical, Orie—Oriental, Ocea—Oceanian, Pala—Palaearctic.
Mite SpeciesHost SpeciesLocalityReferences
Picobia indonesiana Skoracki and Glowska, 2008Aplonis panayensis (Scopoli) *Orie: Indonesia, India[34]; current study
Aplonis metallica (Temminck)Orie: Indonesia,
Ocea: Papua New Guinea		current study
Aplonis magna (Schlegel)Orie: Indonesiacurrent study
Aplonis cantoroides (Gray)Orie: Indonesiacurrent study
Enodes erythrophris (Temminck)Orie: Indonesia[34]
Mino dumontii (Lesson)Orie: Indonesia,
Ocea: Papua New Guinea		[34]; current study
Mino anais (Lesson)Ocea: Papua New Guineacurrent study
Picobia lamprotornis Klimovičová, Skoracki, Wamiti and Hromada, 2014Lamprotornis superbus Rüppell *Afro: Kenya[19,21]
Lamprotornis chalybaeus Hemprich and EhrenbergAfro: Tanzania, Kenya[21]
Lamprotornis chloropterus SwainsonAfro: Tanzania[21]
Poeoptera femoralis (Richmond)Afro: Tanzania[35]
Poeoptera kenricki ShelleyAfro: Tanzania[35]
Picobia malayi Patan and Skoracki sp. n.Gracula religiosa Linnaeus *Orie: Indonesiacurrent study
Streptocitta albicollis (Vieillot)Orie: Indonesiacurrent study
Sarcops calvus (Linnaeus)Orie: Philippinescurrent study
Picobia sturni Skoracki, Bochkov and Wauthy, 2004Sturnus vulgaris Linnaeus *Pala: Poland, Moldova, Slovakia, Iceland, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, China[11,20,36]; current study
Sturnus unicolor TemminckPala: Italy, Spain, Morocco[8]; current study
Spodiopsar cineraceus (Temminck)Pala: China, Japan[11]; current study
Spodiopsar sericeus (Gmelin)Pala: Chinacurrent study
Acridotheres cristatellus (Linnaeus)Pala: Chinacurrent study
Acridotheres fuscus (Wagler)Pala: Nepalcurrent study
Acridotheres tristis (Linnaeus)Orie: Indiacurrent study
Creatophora cinerea (Meuschen)Afro: Kenya, Tanzania[35]
Picobia wisniewskii Patan, Skoracki and Marcisova, 2024Onychognathus morio
(Linnaeus) *		Afro: Tanzania[35]
Onychognathus salvadorii (Sharpe)Afro: Ethiopiacurrent study
Table 2. Host species infested by quill mites with the index of prevalence (IP) and 95% confidence interval (CI, Sterne’s method).
Table 2. Host species infested by quill mites with the index of prevalence (IP) and 95% confidence interval (CI, Sterne’s method).
Host SpeciesNo. ExaminedNo. InfestedPrevalence (CI)Mite Species
Acridotheres cristatellus6116.7% (0.9–58.9)Picobia sturni
Acridotheres fuscus16318.8% (5.3–43.6)Picobia sturni
Acridotheres tristis13430.8% (11.3–58.7)Picobia sturni
Aplonis cantoroides7571.4% (34.1–94.7)Picobia indonesiana
Aplonis magna11100% (5–100)Picobia indonesiana
Aplonis metallica261038.5% (21.2–57.8)Picobia indonesiana
Aplonis panayensis18633.3% (15.6–58.6)Picobia indonesiana
Creatophora cinerea14321.4% (6.1–50)Picobia sturni
Gracula religiosa13646.2% (22.4–74)Picobia malayi
Lamprotornis chalybaeus14214.3% (2.6–42.6)Picobia lamprotornis
Lamprotornis chloropterus17423.5% (8.5–48.9)Picobia lamprotornis
Lamprotornis superbus17423.5% (8.5–48.9)Picobia lamprotornis
Mino anais6583.3% (41.1–99.2)Picobia indonesiana
Mino dumontii1119.1% (0.5–40.5)Picobia indonesiana
Onychognathus morio8562.5% (28.9–88.9)Picobia wisniewskii
Onychognathus salvadorii11100% (5–100)Picobia wisniewskii
Poeoptera femoralis5480% (34.3–99)Picobia lamprotornis
Poeoptera kenricki1715.9% (0.3–28.7)Picobia lamprotornis
Sarcops calvus4250% (9.8–90.2)Picobia malayi sp. n.
Spodiopsar cineraceus16425% (9–50)Picobia sturni
Spodiopsar sericeus8225% (4.6–63.5)Picobia sturni
Streptocitta albicollis11100% (5–100)Picobia malayi sp. n.
Sturnus unicolor12650% (24.3–75.7)Picobia sturni
Sturnus vulgaris1042221.2% (14.3–30.2)Picobia sturni
Table 3. Uninfested starling species.
Table 3. Uninfested starling species.
Starling SpeciesNStarling SpeciesNStarling SpeciesN
Acridotheres melanopterus1Aplonis minor6Aplonis opaca2
Hartlaubius auratus1Hylopsar cupreocauda1Hylopsar purpureiceps1
Lamprotornis australis1Lamprotornis caudatus2Lamprotornis fischeri5
Lamprotornis nitens6Lamprotornis purpureus3Lamprotornis purpuroptera5
Lamprotornis regius3Lamprotornis splendidus4Onychognathus tristramii1
Poeoptera sharpii11Poeoptera stuhlmanni1Saroglossa spilopterus2
Speculipastor bicolor1Sturnia sinensis2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sikora, B.; Kosicki, J.Z.; Patan, M.; Marcisova, I.; Hromada, M.; Skoracki, M. Diversity and Interactions between Picobiine Mites and Starlings. Animals 2024, 14, 2517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172517

AMA Style

Sikora B, Kosicki JZ, Patan M, Marcisova I, Hromada M, Skoracki M. Diversity and Interactions between Picobiine Mites and Starlings. Animals. 2024; 14(17):2517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sikora, Bozena, Jakub Z. Kosicki, Milena Patan, Iva Marcisova, Martin Hromada, and Maciej Skoracki. 2024. "Diversity and Interactions between Picobiine Mites and Starlings" Animals 14, no. 17: 2517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172517

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop