Next Article in Journal
CFD Investigation on Combined Ventilation System for Multilayer-Caged-Laying Hen Houses
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic and Conventional Inbreeding Coefficient Estimation Using Different Estimator Models in Korean Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire Breeds Using 70K Porcine SNP BeadChip
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applying Iterative Student Feedback across Flipped Classroom and Flexible Teaching Approaches: Impact on Veterinary Students’ Learning Experience
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Education and Communication in Veterinary Clinical Practice

School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton Campus, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia
Animals 2024, 14(17), 2622; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172622
Submission received: 6 September 2024 / Accepted: 9 September 2024 / Published: 9 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Education and Communication in Veterinary Clinical Practice)
Effective communication is a hallmark of successful veterinary clinical practice. Communication underpins professionalism, establishes effective teamwork, and is essential to veterinary–client relationships. Teaching or developing effective communication is an increasingly important component of the ‘hidden’ curriculum for veterinary educators, introduced and reinforced throughout the teaching program. Effective communication is also a focus for prospective employers when considering a new graduate. Successful communication must also consider the rapidly changing modalities of how people communicate and, importantly, how important communication will be toward resilience in a highly stressful profession.
The ‘intervention’ of COVID-19 rapidly taught everyone that traditional approaches to communication were not always feasible or safe. A paradigm shift occurred for many higher education providers, particularly during the peak stages of the pandemic, when face-to-face (F-2-F) teaching was either not permitted or impractical. Indeed, the emergency response teaching [1] largely consisted of rapid, large-scale online adaptation of teaching and assessment strategies [2]. eLearning became the new paradigm as teachers and educators attempted to maintain student learning within pandemic restrictions that varied by country and region. Blended learning and flipped classrooms have been reported to be educationally sound [3,4,5,6], so it was pleasing to include examples in this Special Issue where veterinary educators have also used these approaches successfully. Using flipped classrooms and/or blended learning to successfully teach cardiac auscultation and anatomical structure are examples of teaching that would normally only be considered effective in an F-2-F setting. An important outcome of using flipped classrooms is that students are more likely to engage in deep learning strategies due to a reduction in cognitive load [7,8].
It was interesting that several articles in this Special Issue focused on enhancing interpersonal and interprofessional communication skills. Returning to the impact of COVID-19, it was highlighted that human physicians tend to consider veterinarians as having a superior knowledge and understanding of zoonoses [9,10]. This superior comprehension and ability to diagnose [11] places veterinarians in a unique position at the human–animal interface [12], elevating the importance of interprofessional communication.
An important underlying theme of this Special Issue is that successful and safe graduate transition to veterinary clinical practice is associated with communication competency development [13,14]. It was therefore pleasing to see veterinary educators describing their success in using blended learning approaches to improve communication and establish personal relationships between veterinarians and the pet owners, which has been reported to improve the quality and outcomes of medical treatments [15,16]. This Special Issue takes this further by teaching students to self-assess their communication skills, adding an important cognitive alignment to the increasingly popular use of self-directed learning (SDL).
The importance of effective communication exceeds many barriers that could normally be expected to restrict learning. What the papers included in this Special Issue have in common is veterinary educators adopting and adapting aspects of learning theory to enhance the outcomes in veterinary science students by focusing on communication at multiple levels of the curriculum.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Singh, A.A.; Shapter, F.M.; Bernard, A.; Whitworth, D.J.; Holt, M.G.; Waller, P.S.; Bond, S.L. Applying Iterative Student Feedback across Flipped Classroom and Flexible Teaching Approaches: Impact on Veterinary Students’ Learning Experience. Animals 2024, 14, 2335; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14162335.
  • Arnecke, A.L.; Schwarz, S.; Lübke-Becker, A.; Jensen, K.C.; Herre, C.; Bahramsoltani, M. Risk Communication on Zoonoses and Antimicrobial Resistance—How Do Exotic Pet Owners Perceive the Communication of Their Veterinarians? Animals 2024, 14, 2035; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14142035.
  • Wood, A.; Shapter, F.M.; Stewart, A.J. Assessment of a Teaching Module for Cardiac Auscultation of Horses by Veterinary Students. Animals 2024, 14, 1341; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14091341.
  • Heise, S.A.C.; Tipold, A.; Rohn, K.; Kleinsorgen, C. Measuring Veterinarian Professions’ Readiness for Interprofessional Learning in a Pre- and Post-Intervention Study. Animals 2024, 14, 229; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14020229.
  • van Gelderen, I.; Taylor, R. Developing Communication Competency in the Veterinary Curriculum. Animals 2023, 13, 3668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233668.
  • MacMartin, C.; Wheat, H.; Coe, J.B. Conversation Analysis of Clients’ Active Resistance to Veterinarians’ Proposals for Long-Term Dietary Change in Companion Animal Practice in Ontario, Canada. Animals 2023, 13, 2150; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132150.
  • Gómez, O.; García-Manzanares, M.; Chicharro, D.; Juárez, M.; Llamazares-Martín, C.; Soriano, E.; Terrado, J. Application of Blended Learning to Veterinary Gross Anatomy Practical Sessions: Students’ Perceptions of Their Learning Experience and Academic Outcomes. Animals 2023, 13, 1666; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101666.
  • Blázquez-Llorca, L.; Morales de Paz, L.; Martín-Orti, R.; Santos-Álvarez, I.; Fernández-Valle, M.E.; Castejón, D.; García-Real, M.I.; Salgüero-Fernández, R.; Pérez-Lloret, P.; Moreno, N.; et al. The Application of 3D Anatomy for Teaching Veterinary Clinical Neurology. Animals 2023, 13, 1601; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13101601.
  • Kneissl, S.M.; Tichy, A.; Mitlacher, S.F. Flipped Classroom to Facilitate Deeper Learning in Veterinary Undergraduate Students: An Educational Change Pilot Study Limited to the Imaging Module Bones. Animals 2023, 13, 1540; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091540.
  • Bahramsoltani, M.; Bröer, S.; Langforth, S.; Eule, C.; Prior, A.; Vogt, L.; Li, T.-T.; Schirone, R.; Pohl, A.; Jensen, K.C. Outcome of Communication Training in Veterinary Studies: Influence on the Perception of the Relevance of Veterinary Competencies and Self-Assessment of Communication Skills. Animals 2023, 13, 1516; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13091516.
  • Heise, S.A.C.; Wissing, S.; Nerschbach, V.; Preussing, E.; Tipold, A.; Kleinsorgen, C. Evaluation of an Interprofessional Blended Learning Course Focusing on Communication within Veterinary Teams. Animals 2024, 14, 729; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050729.

References

  1. Mercer-Mapstone, L.; Dvorakova, S.L.; Matthews, K.E.; Abbot, S.; Cheng, B.; Felten, P.; Knorr, K.; Marquis, E.; Shammas, R.; Swaim, K. A systematic literature review of students as partners in higher education. Int. J. Stud. Partn. 2017, 1, 15–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hodges, C.; Moore, S.; Lockee, B.; Trust, T.; Bond, A. The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. 2020. Available online: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (accessed on 21 August 2024).
  3. Goyal, M.; Krishnamurthi, R.; Yadav, D. E-Learning Methodologies—Fundamentals, Technologies and Applications; Institution of Engineering and Technology: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Reidsema, C.; Kavanagh, L.; Hadgraft, R.; Smith, N. The Flipped Classroom: Practice and Practices in Higher Education, 1st ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. Abeysekera, L.; Dawson, P. Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2015, 34, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. O’Flaherty, J.; Phillips, C. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet High. Educ. 2015, 25, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sweller, J.; Ayres, P.; Kalyuga, S. Cognitive Load Theory; Springer Science+Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sweller, J.; Chandler, P. Why some material is difficult to learn. Cogn. Instr. 1994, 12, 185–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grant, S.; Olsen, C.W. Preventing zoonotic diseases in immunocompromised persons: The role of physicians and veterinarians. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 1999, 5, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hill, W.A.; Petty, G.C.; Erwin, P.C.; Souza, M.J. A survey of Tennessee veterinarian and physician attitudes, knowledge, and practices regarding zoonoses prevention among animal owners with HIV infection or AIDS. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2012, 240, 1432–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Garcia-Sanchez, P.; Romero-Trancón, D.; Sainz, T.; Calvo, C.; Iglesias, I.; Perez-Hernando, B.; Hurtado-Gallego, J.; Sánchez, R.; Alcolea, S.; Moya, L.; et al. The role of veterinarians in zoonosis prevention: Advising families of immunocompromised children with pets. One Health 2024, 18, 100662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. de Melo, R.T.; Rossi, D.A.; Monteiro, G.P.; Fernandez, H. Veterinarians and One Health in the Fight Against Zoonoses Such as COVID-19. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 576262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cake, M.A.; Bell, M.A.; Williams, J.C.; Brown, F.J.L.; Dozier, M.; Rhind, S.M.; Baillie, S. Which professional (non-technical) competencies are most important to the success of graduate veterinarians? A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review: BEME Guide No. 38. Med. Teach. 2016, 38, 550–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hodgson, J.L.; Pelzer, J.M. (Eds.) Veterinary Medical Education: A Practical Guide; Wiley Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamood, W.J.; Chur-Hansen, A.; McArthur, M.L. A qualitative study to explore communication skills in veterinary medical education. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2014, 5, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pun, J.K.H. An integrated review of the role of communication in veterinary clinical practice. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mills, P.C. Education and Communication in Veterinary Clinical Practice. Animals 2024, 14, 2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172622

AMA Style

Mills PC. Education and Communication in Veterinary Clinical Practice. Animals. 2024; 14(17):2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172622

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mills, Paul C. 2024. "Education and Communication in Veterinary Clinical Practice" Animals 14, no. 17: 2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14172622

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop