Next Article in Journal
Effect of Guanidinoacetic Acid Supplementation on the Performance of Calves Fed Milk Replacer
Previous Article in Journal
Stepwise Imperatives for Improving the Protection of Animals in Research and Education in Canada
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Agreement of Doppler Ultrasound and Visual Sphygmomanometer Needle Oscillation with Invasive Blood Pressure in Anaesthetised Dogs

1
Department of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Alton GU34 3HL, UK
2
CVS UK Ltd., CVS House, Diss IP22 4ER, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(19), 2756; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192756
Submission received: 16 August 2024 / Revised: 17 September 2024 / Accepted: 19 September 2024 / Published: 24 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Companion Animals)

Simple Summary

Doppler ultrasound is a commonly utilised non-invasive blood pressure measurement technique in dogs under general anaesthesia. This prospective clinical study compared the agreement of values obtained by audible return of pulsatile flow using Doppler ultrasound and visual sphygmomanometer needle oscillation with invasive arterial blood pressure in a clinical population of anaesthetised dogs.

Abstract

Visual sphygmomanometer needle oscillation (SNO) can occur before audible return of pulsatile flow (ARPF) when measuring blood pressure by Doppler ultrasound. The aim was to assess the agreement of SNO and ARPF with invasive blood pressure (iABP) in a clinical population of anaesthetised dogs. A total of 35 dogs undergoing surgery in dorsal recumbency necessitating arterial cannulation were included. Paired measurements of iABP and SNO, and iABP and ARPF, were collected. The agreement of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) and iABP measurements was analysed with concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and Bland–Altman plots. The proportions of SNO and ARPF measurements between 10 and 20 mmHg of iABP were compared. Both SNO and ARPF demonstrated greater agreement with invasive systolic (iSAP) than invasive mean (iMAP) pressures, and SNO demonstrated greater agreement with iSAP than ARPF measurements. The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) for SNO and APRF were −9.7 mmHg (−51.3–31.9) and −13.1 mmHg (−62.2–35.9), respectively. The CCC (95% CI) for SNO was 0.5 (0.36–0.64) and ARPF was 0.4 (0.26–0.54). A significantly greater proportion of SNO measurements were within 20 mmHg of iSAP compared to ARPF. Both NIBP techniques performed more poorly than veterinary consensus recommendations for device validation. Caution should be used clinically when interpreting values obtained by Doppler ultrasound in anaesthetised dogs.
Keywords: anaesthesia; dogs; blood pressure; Doppler; invasive blood pressure; clinical study anaesthesia; dogs; blood pressure; Doppler; invasive blood pressure; clinical study

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Armour, M.; Michou, J.; Schofield, I.; Borland, K. Agreement of Doppler Ultrasound and Visual Sphygmomanometer Needle Oscillation with Invasive Blood Pressure in Anaesthetised Dogs. Animals 2024, 14, 2756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192756

AMA Style

Armour M, Michou J, Schofield I, Borland K. Agreement of Doppler Ultrasound and Visual Sphygmomanometer Needle Oscillation with Invasive Blood Pressure in Anaesthetised Dogs. Animals. 2024; 14(19):2756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192756

Chicago/Turabian Style

Armour, Marc, Joanne Michou, Imogen Schofield, and Karla Borland. 2024. "Agreement of Doppler Ultrasound and Visual Sphygmomanometer Needle Oscillation with Invasive Blood Pressure in Anaesthetised Dogs" Animals 14, no. 19: 2756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192756

APA Style

Armour, M., Michou, J., Schofield, I., & Borland, K. (2024). Agreement of Doppler Ultrasound and Visual Sphygmomanometer Needle Oscillation with Invasive Blood Pressure in Anaesthetised Dogs. Animals, 14(19), 2756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192756

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop