Next Article in Journal
An Innovative Approach: The Usage of N-Acetylcysteine in the Therapy of Pneumonia in Neonatal Calves
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Lighting Regimen and Feeding Program during Rearing on Hy-Line Brown Pullets at the End of Rearing and during Early Lay
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inclusion of Sorghum in Cyprinus carpio L. Diet: Effects on Growth, Flesh Quality, Microbiota, and Oxidative Status
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Factors Affecting Yeast Digestibility and Immunostimulation in Aquatic Animals

1
Kaposvár Campus, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Guba S. 40., 7400 Kaposvár, Hungary
2
Research Center for Fisheries and Aquaculture, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Anna-liget u. 35, 5540 Szarvas, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2024, 14(19), 2851; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192851
Submission received: 12 August 2024 / Revised: 11 September 2024 / Accepted: 25 September 2024 / Published: 3 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Feed Ingredients in Freshwater Aquaculture)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This paper provides an overview of the key issues concerning the use of yeast products as an alternative protein source and feed additives to develop a more sustainable and environmentally friendly aquaculture. The use of yeast is presented in detail, with a particular focus on its use as a primary protein source and as a supplement (such as probiotics and immune stimulants). Additionally, the digestibility of yeasts and their use in live aquafeed culture are discussed in detail.

Abstract

The aquafeed industry increasingly relies on using sustainable and appropriate protein sources to ensure the long-term sustainability and financial viability of intensive aquaculture. Yeast has emerged as a viable substitute protein source in the aquaculture sector due to its potential as a nutritional supplement. A substantial body of evidence exists to suggest that yeast has the potential to act as an effective immune-stimulating agent for a range of aquaculture fish species. Furthermore, the incorporation of yeast supplements and feed additives has the potential to bolster disease prevention, development, and production within the aquaculture sector. Except for methionine, lysine, arginine, and phenylalanine, which are typically the limiting essential amino acids in various fish species, the various yeast species exhibit amino acid profiles that are advantageous when compared to fishmeal. The present review considers the potential nutritional suitability of several yeast species for fish, with particular attention to the various applications of yeast in aquaculture nutrition. The findings of this study indicate that the inclusion of yeast in the diet resulted in the most favorable outcomes, with improvements observed in the overall health, growth performance, and nutritional condition of the fish. Digestibility, a key factor in sustainable feed development, is discussed in special detail. Additionally, this review addresses the utilization of yeast as an immunostimulating agent for fish and its digestion in fish. Furthermore, the research emphasizes the necessity of large-scale production of yeast as a substitute for fishmeal in aquaculture.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture is an essential component of the global animal production system to meet the long-term protein needs of the world’s population [1]. In recent years, the global aquaculture industry has seen an increase in the importance of using cutting-edge nutritional techniques to improve fish health and disease resistance [2]. Aquaculture must continue to expand sustainably to meet the future demand for animal protein and support the continued growth of the global population [3]. The sector has encountered obstacles to its rapid growth, including diseases and restricted access to high-quality protein sources for fish feed. In aquatic species, protein represents the primary dry matter component of growth [4]. Aquafeeds are formulated to include all the essential nutrients that fish require to maintain optimal health. Fishmeal (FM) and fish oil (FO), which are derived primarily from wild-caught small pelagics like anchovies, sardines, and menhaden, have historically been a significant component of aquaculture diets. According to IFFO, approximately 69% of FM and 75% of FO are utilized in aquaculture production [5]. In particular, the proportions of fishmeal and fish oil have significantly decreased and have been substituted with components derived from plants. Despite changes in feed composition to reduce marine ingredient dependency, the sustainable development of aquaculture faces threats from stagnant fishmeal and fish oil supply [6]. Furthermore, fishmeal and plant-based meals are currently utilized as primary sources of protein. Consequently, sustainability concerns have necessitated the identification of novel sustainable components for aquafeeds [7]. Compared to animal-sourced feedstuffs, plant-sourced feedstuffs frequently exhibit reduced dry matter contents of amino acids (AAs) and crude protein (CP) [4,8]. The reduction in fish stocks and the elevated cost of fishmeal have created significant challenges for the aquaculture industry in meeting its consumption requirements. It is therefore a global priority to identify alternative protein sources that can be used to replace fishmeal in aquafeeds [9]. Over the next ten years, it is predicted that fisheries’ trimmings and byproducts will provide increasing fishmeal and oil production [10]. However, they will likely not be sufficient to meet anticipated demand by 2050 [11], which may also have an impact on the nutritional value of farmed fish. In response to these growing concerns, large-scale research has recently been conducted to identify acceptable fishmeal substitutes that can be included in the diets of a variety of aquatic animal species. To address these challenges, novel aquafeed materials have been developed, including macroalgae, insects, genetically modified crops, and single-cell proteins derived from microalgae, bacteria, or yeasts [12]. Furthermore, single-cell protein sources, particularly yeast protein products, may serve as a supplementary solution to offset the adverse effects of plant proteins [13].
Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of yeast as a viable alternative protein source in aquaculture, offering a promising solution to replace fishmeal [7,14]. Research findings have shown that yeast can be a sustainable and high-quality protein source in fish diets, with favorable amino acid composition and health benefits [15]. The latest advances in yeast research have focused on its potential as a functional ingredient and nutritional supplement that can enhance fish immune systems and gut health [3]. Recent advances in the study of yeast have focused on its potential as a functional component and dietary supplement that strengthens the immune systems and gut health of fish. In aquaculture, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its byproducts are the most often utilized functional feed additives [16,17]. Yeast supplements have improved immunity and enhanced aquaculture water quality, leading to better productivity and disease protection [18]. Dietary yeast extracts have also been found to promote the growth of beneficial bacteria and inhibit some pathogenic species in fish [19]. For instance, supplementing the diet of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) with brewer’s yeast hydrolysate inhibited bacterial members of the genus Mycoplasma and significantly increased Cetobacterium in their intestines [19]. Furthermore, yeast-derived cell wall fractions have been shown to have immunological and health benefits for fish [15]. Several scientific reviews have explained the health benefits of these cell wall components in different species over the years, but little is known about the function of yeast as a macro-ingredient in fish feeds [20]. However, supplementing with S. cerevisiae as a probiotic has improved the growth, immunity, and disease resistance of various fish species [21]. Probiotic fermentation can help remove toxicity from dietary ingredients used as alternative protein sources to replace fishmeal [22]. In addition, yeasts have been used to develop artemia and rotifers or to ferment feedstock following artificial or natural colonization in the gastrointestinal tracts of the hosts [18,23]. Other findings underscore the value and sustainability of yeast products as a nutritional source in aquaculture. Their probiotic effects also enhance water quality [24].
This review aims to present an overview of current knowledge regarding the use of yeasts as a primary source of protein, supplements, and probiotics in aquaculture systems. In particular, it will emphasize the effects of these organisms on the growth performance, digestibility, physiology, and immune system of aquatic species.

2. Yeast Cell Wall Components and Their Nutritional Properties

Yeast, a single-celled eukaryote with membranous organelles such as mitochondria, nucleus, and endomembrane system, is a protein source in aquafeeds for shrimp and marine fish. Many yeast species are frequently utilized, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Kluyveromyces, Torulaspora, Saccharomyces, and Torulopsis [14]. The yeast cell wall provides structural support and is made up of 10–15% proteins and 85–90% polysaccharides [25].
The mucosal immune responses of rainbow trout were evaluated when supplementing an experimental formulated feed with multi-strain yeast fraction product of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Cyberlindnera jardinii and found that the extracts enhanced and strengthened the ability of innate immune cells of mucosal-associated lymphoid tissues of fish [26].
Another study aimed to characterize the biochemical and molecular properties of four proprietary yeast cell wall extracts from S. cerevisiae about their potential effect on the intestinal immune responses when given orally to zebrafish (Danio rerio), concluding that these characteristics give a chance to correctly evaluate the immune potential of the tested products. Additionally, this study offered novel perspectives on the development of specific fractions derived from S. cerevisiae for use in precision animal feeds [27].
The estimated polysaccharide content of the S. cerevisiae cell wall is 30–60% b-1, 3-glucan and 1, 6-glucan, 25–30% mannan, and 5–10% chitin [25]. Table 1 shows that yeast S. cerevisiae contains approximately 32–62% protein [28]. On average, 93–97% of dry yeast is composed of dry matter, which includes 40–60% crude nitrogen and poultry byproducts protein, 5–9% lipids, and 35–45% carbohydrates [28,29].
Additionally, it is also stated that yeast species such as S. cerevisiae have unsaturated fatty acids, and linoleic and alpha-linolenic acids, which can also be formed by fatty acid desaturase [28]. Low-value and non-food cellulosic materials are fermented to produce dry yeast products, via the pre-treatment of biomass by the extraction of lignin; hydrolysis to release cellulose and hemicellulose; enzymatic hydrolysis to release hemicellulose and cellulose into C5 and C6 sugars; fermentation of sugars, ammonia, phosphorus, and other nutrients; and downstream processing into dry yeast products for use as a source of protein in fish feed [15,18].
It can be stated in general that the characteristics of yeast products make them ideal feed ingredients, serving as valuable protein sources. Additionally, their role as pre- and provitamins is of significant importance.

3. Use of Yeast in Fish Feeding

As mentioned above, fishmeal is a highly digestible feed ingredient for animals and a great source of high-quality protein, fatty acids, and readily available minerals and vitamins [31]. Finding local raw resources is necessary since the high cost of imported raw materials drives up the price of locally produced feed [32]. Fishmeal inclusion levels in aquafeed must also be lowered to save costs and save the environment [12]. Current research on fish nutrition and aquafeed production primarily focuses on assessing the potential of non-conventional protein sources. These sources include plant-derived proteins, processed animal byproducts, and single-cell proteins [33,34].
As a high-nutritional eukaryotic organism, yeast is an appropriate candidate for use as animal feed [35]. One of the most significant qualities of yeast as a potential feed ingredient is its capacity to transform industrial biomass, forestry waste, and less valuable, inedible food byproducts into high-quality food or feed ingredients with little to no dependence on arable land and water. Furthermore, the use of yeast as a feed ingredient results in a net reduction in climate change [36,37].
Furthermore, the utilization of yeast as a fish feed represents a potentially cost-effective and environmentally sustainable approach within the domain of aquaculture biotechnology, which could diminish reliance on fishmeal [38]. Fishmeal or plant proteins can be substituted with the affordable yeast S. cerevisiae, which has been shown to have no detrimental effects on the growth and nutritional performance of rainbow trout [39], Nile tilapia [40], and Arctic charr [41]. A study on alternate sources of protein also reveals that S. cerevisiae is an effective natural resource of protein in the replacement of fishmeal in tilapia feed [42]. Similarly, another study found that the 15% inclusion of yeast had increased the growth performance without reducing the quality of the end product [43]. The productivity, immunity, and overall health of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) have all been improved by the use of fermented yeast products [17]. Recent advances in yeast research are more focused on their potential as nutritional supplements and functional properties with beneficial effects on the immune responses and gut health in fish [3].
The use of yeast as an aquatic feed ingredient is undoubtedly aligned with the developmental objectives of sustainability, resulting in both economic and environmental benefits. The extensive literature overview encompasses a vast array of products, doses applied, species fed on, and effects evaluated. To facilitate a summary, a division was applied as seen below. However, it must be acknowledged that this division may appear somewhat forced at times, given that multiple effects were measured and evaluated in the majority of the studies discussed here.

4. Use of Yeast as the Primary Protein Source in Aquafeed

Yeast cells have high protein content (approximately 40–55%) and other bioactive compounds that are essential for fish development and growth performance [7,39]. A multitude of research investigations have demonstrated the beneficial impacts of incorporating whole yeast and/or its byproducts into the diet on Nile tilapia growth performance, hematological indices, antioxidant defense systems, immunological response, and disease resistance [17,44]. Research suggests that a diet enriched with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) can improve the growth performance, intestinal morphology, redox homeostasis, and immune response of S. aurata. The most effective concentration was found to be 4 g/kg [45]. Candida species are commonly used in rainbow trout diets, and up to 40% of fishmeal can be effectively substituted without any reduction in production or efficiency [14]. In a study, it was revealed that by increasing the feed conversion ratio and body nitrogen retention, a 15% protein-rich yeast fraction inclusion could enhance the growth performance of trout fed on plant-based diets [13].
Brewer’s yeast, mainly the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain, has been used as nitrogen-rich ingredients in aquaculture feeds from the beginning of the 1990s [46]. A study was conducted to assess the suitability of brewer’s spent yeast (BSY) in aquafeed for Labeo rohita growth, hemato-biochemical parameters, and enzyme activities, and fishmeal was gradually replaced at an increased level [47]. The study found that replacing 30% of fishmeal with brewer’s wasted yeast considerably improves growth and immunity in L. rohita. In addition, another study revealed that replacing 45% of fishmeal with brewer’s yeast can improve the growth performance and immune response of the Thai Panga (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus × Pangasius bocourti) [48]. In addition, it was suggested that dried yeast could replace up to 30 and 50% of the protein provided by FM/SBM (50/50%), respectively, without affecting the performance of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) [49]. In the research, it was concluded that the growth, immunity, and disease resistance of channel catfish were enhanced by replacing fish feed with yeast culture, and the intestinal microbiota of the fish, which was induced by the yeast culture, was a key factor in these outcomes [50]. Furthermore, dietary fermented yeast could be used as a strategic option to maintain tilapia production [17]. Moreover, yeast can convert low-value biomass leftovers from agriculture and forests into high-value feed components, making it a sustainable and environmentally friendly element [37]. Consequently, it follows that fishmeal can be substituted with single-cell yeast protein at certain levels to reduce the aquafeed cost and preserve the sustainable output of aquaculture for the mentioned aquatic species. The effects of yeast products on different fish species are summarized in Table 2.
The results of the experiments demonstrate that the majority of animals exhibited good growth performance when provided with yeast products as a primary protein source. In instances where this trait did not outperform the control, other beneficial effects were observed. However, given the significant diversity in cultured species and age groups, as well as the range of products utilized, a continuous optimization of feed formulations is essential.

5. Use of Yeast as Supplement in Aquafeed

Yeast supplements and feed additives improve fish health and production, leading to increased growth in the aquaculture industry [18]. Yeast-based diets are high in protein, lipids, attractants, and other nutrients. Candida sp., Kluveromyces sp., and Phaffia sp. are three yeast species commonly utilized as fishmeal alternatives. Several studies have studied the effects of partial and complete substitution of fishmeal with brewer’s yeast on the growth, body composition, feed consumption, and digestibility of juvenile tilapia [23]. Another study revealed that yeast supplement is a promising growth promoter and might be an alternative method to antibiotics for disease prevention of Mystus cavasius) [23]. Selenium is a crucial dietary mineral for immune system function, cell growth regulation, and stress response (Se). It has been observed to improve growth performance, feed utilization, and immunocompetence in a variety of fish species, including Wuchang bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) [68], hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × Morone saxatilis) [69], and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [70]. Some studies reported that the dietary fishmeal inclusion level could be reduced to 14% with SPC (Soy Protein Concentrate) [71] or a blend of soybean meal and poultry byproduct meal [72] serving as the fishmeal substitute. In a recent study, it was proven that the dietary fishmeal inclusion level for golden pompano could be reduced to 240 g.kg−1 with soy protein as a fishmeal alternative and 1 g kg−1 of Se-yeast supplementation. The loss in growth in golden pompano fed a high soy protein-based diet could be due to selenium (Se) deficiency rather than low feed intake and utilization [73]. However, there hasn’t been enough research conducted on how dietary yeast affects the replacement of meals.
A study revealed that the inclusion of yeast in fermented poultry byproduct meal (pbm) in the diet of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) at 15–20% level increased digestive enzyme activities, immune function, and the growth of the fish [74]. In contrast, it has been shown that common carps can utilize a high percentage of their dietary protein requirement from the yeasts Candida tropicalis, Candida utilis, and Candida lipolytica with better results than those obtained with soybean or meat and bone meal. Furthermore, it was revealed that various levels of dried yeast in fish feed results in significant impact on body weight of fish as indicated by 20% greater growth by the dietary yeast inclusion in the replacement of fishmeal up to 40% [43]. Likewise, many yeast species have a high impact on the growth performance, feed efficiency, and body composition of different aquaculture species, as shown in Table 3. Therefore, to lower the cost of aquafeed for the sustainable production of aquaculture for these species, it can be deduced that fishmeal should subsequently be substituted at these levels with single-cell yeast protein [75].
The findings of the literature review indicate that the evaluated yeast products effectively functioned as prebiotics and probiotics, and the animals fed them exhibited favorable growth, feed conversion, and survival rates. However, due to the ongoing advancement in methodology for measuring and evaluating the impact of immunostimulation and microbiome diversity enhancement, direct comparisons of the results are challenging.

5.1. Use of Yeast as Probiotics in Aquafeed

Aquaculture is expanding worldwide, yet adverse circumstances of fish culture can cause disease and financial loss. Probiotics are being promoted as a safe and sustainable alternative to traditional aquaculture [90]. In addition, probiotics are considered as live or dead microorganisms, or microalgae or yeast that give health advantages when supplied in sufficient doses [91]. Additionally, probiotics can improve fish health by enhancing feed conversion and digestion, reducing stress sensitivity, and raising overall health [92]. Additionally, probiotics stimulate the secretion of intestinal mucus, promote the growth of microvilli, and create barriers against invading pathogens [21]. The scientific community is searching for alternatives to lessen the misuse of antibiotics because they impair fish immunity, harm the aquatic ecosystem, and are present in fish tissue, which can be harmful to consumers’ health [93]. Additives with prebiotic properties from yeast byproducts are used in animal diets to promote growth, improve digestion, enhance microorganism activity, and enhance immune system functionality [94]. Yeasts are resistant to antibacterial medications, making them useful as probiotic supplements during antibiotic treatment. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. cerevisiae var. boulardii (or S. boulardii) are widely explored as probiotic yeasts from various sources [95,96,97]. The addition of supplements containing yeast probiotics to fish feed has been shown by several researchers to enhance growth rate [18,40,42], feed digestion [18,23,39], stress tolerance [40], the immune system [18,23], and disease control [40,42,98]. Studies have shown the individual and combinational effects of probiotics (B. subtilis, B. licheniformis and S. cerevisiae) on the growth, body composition, digestive enzymes, and intestinal morphology of A. persicus fingerling and also suggested that the bacterial probiotics might be more effective than the yeast [99]. Probiotics are an environmentally benign way to boost fish health and growth in tilapia farming, as they can replace antibiotics. The study suggests that the use of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in tilapia aquaculture can significantly enhance growth and immunity, requiring an optimal dosage and administration time [100]. In addition, probiotics and prebiotics have emerged as ecologically benign alternatives to antibiotic treatments in shrimp farming, as a result of the increased interest in investigating alternative approaches [101]. In addition, research into whiteleg shrimp Penaeus vannamei has demonstrated that the use of mixed probiotic cultures improves viability, feed conversion, and the final yield of farmed shrimp [102].
In a study, the effect of probiotics was analyzed on survival, welfare, growth indices, and blood composition in Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) raised in a recirculating system. The results revealed that adding yeasts as probiotics to the meals of Acipenser baerii fed in a circulating system increased the fish’s growth, survival, and well-being [92]. In addition, it was suggested that probiotic-rich diets can enhance the immunological response and growth of Siberian sturgeons [103]. It has been demonstrated that probiotics positively impact the growth, survival, and health of aquatic animals. Probiotics have been included in aquaculture methods to address the requirement for greater disease resistance, enhanced aquatic organism growth, and feed efficiency [104,105]. The individual and combined effects of probiotics in Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) were assessed by measuring growth performance, proximate body composition, digestive enzymes, and intestinal morphology. The findings contributed to a growing body of literature about the individual and combined effects of probiotics with S. cerevisiae on growth, body composition, digestive enzymes, and intestinal architecture of Acipenser persicus fingerling [99]. Furthermore, commercial probiotic products are currently being made from several species of yeast, such as S. cerevisiae, as indicated in Table 2. It can be concluded that the use of yeasts as probiotics is expanding, and it is advantageous to consider these yeasts as a potential substitute for improving development, digestibility, survival rate, feed efficiency, and capacity to fortify the immune systems of fish larvae and juveniles. A summary of the effects of yeast products as probiotics can be found in Table 4.

5.2. Use of Yeast as Immune-Stimulant for Fish

Yeast meal used in aquaculture has been proven to enhance growth, modulate gut microbiota, and boost fish immune systems. Yeast has emerged as a sustainable innovative element in aquafeed due to its potential benefits for immunostimulation and nutrition of several species in aquaculture [18]. To varied degrees of success, numerous studies have been conducted to determine the effects of these immunostimulants on fish development, intestinal morphology, and overall health. In addition to its probiotic effects, Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be utilized as an immunostimulant for fish raised in captivity that can benefit from Saccharomyces cerevisiae’s ability to promote growth and disease resistance [108]. Research on the potential of yeast as a possible fish feed ingredient is scanty, with a lot of focus on S. cerevisiae [3]. Few studies assess the health benefits of using yeast as a source of protein, even though positive health effects have been reported when using entire S. cerevisiae yeast or yeast derivatives. Low levels of S. cerevisiae yeast have shown to enhance growth performance, immune responses, and/or protection against bacterial infection and increase disease resistance in several fish species, such as salmonids [109], common carp [74], Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicas) [60], and Nile tilapia [110]. Yeasts such as C. utilis have also been shown to modulate immune responses in rainbow trout, [111] and K. marxi-anus has shown probiotic properties in an in vitro colonic model system [112]. Many researchers are interested in yeast cell wall derivatives because of their immunostimulatory qualities and, in part, since the use of chemotherapy in animal feed is prohibited. The majority of recent developments in the study of yeast cell walls, however, have focused more on polysaccharides devoid of the lipid moiety because it has also been noted that these molecules interact with immune system cells and chemicals related to humoral immunity [113]. Additionally, it has been reported that immunostimulatory polysaccharides promote the differentiation, proliferation, and improved function of macrophages by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) [113].
Yeasts are a good source of β-glucan which is well known for its role in immunostimulation in fishes and other vertebrates [114]. β-glucan from yeast is crucial for fish development as it boosts the immune system and protects against infections in various ways. In addition, β-glucans facilitate several biological processes such as wound healing [115], stress tolerance [116], and antioxidant [117] and antibacterial processes [118]. The most commonly utilized β-glucans for studying mechanisms of action are those of commercial origin, with recommended doses from manufacturers. Nonetheless, their immunological activity is ineffective in other fish species, and increasing the dose may have negative consequences, including immune suppression [119]. β-glucans are considered as one kind of pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) [120]. They therefore cause fish to develop a signaling route, and the signaling pathway has been explained and exemplified in Figure 1 using the most recent fish β-glucan research. In addition, they are applied to farm animals to increase feed conversion ratios (FCR), replace antibiotics in the guts of fish, eradicate opportunistic bacteria, enhance intestinal morphology and function, and enhance both innate and acquired immune functions [121], a concept originated from the discovery that certain sugars, like mannose, could be used as inhibitors of pathogen adhesion to intestinal cells [20].
Several studies have assessed the effects of probiotics on the immune status and gut microbiota of European sea bass, (Dicentrarchus labrax L., 1758). The investigated aspects range from antioxidant and digestive enzyme activities, growth performances, gut histology and immune-histochemistry, and gut microbiota to disease resistance and stress tolerance, the immunological and hematological response, body composition, malformations, and the survival rate [122,123,124,125,126]. However, there is a gap in the literature on the use of S. boulardii and its effects on the intestinal immune system of fish. These findings indicate that yeast products are thought to be more effective as immunostimulants than immunizations and antibiotics to reduce fish mortality.
The results of the literature review demonstrate that the evaluated yeast products effectively functioned as prebiotics and probiotics. The separation of the two previous chapters was solely for the purpose of providing an overview of the discussed questions. However, in experimental practice, these are inseparable, given the methodology that is typically applied

6. Digestibility of Yeast in Fish and Crustaceans

Digestibility is an important characteristic of yeast that makes it an economically competitive protein source for aquaculture, comparable to conventional sources in various fish species’ diets [15,18]. Yeast cell walls represent 26–32% of the cell dry weight and contain varying proportions of mannan-oligosaccharides, β-glucan, chitin, and nucleic acids, depending on the species. In addition, the cell wall fraction contains bioactive substances like as β-glucan and mannan oligosaccharides, which promote protein solubility and digestibility during in vitro digestion [127]. Increasing replacement of fishmeal with S. cerevisiae in the latter study also resulted in slightly decreasing apparent digestibility of dry matter. Baker’s yeast is a type of probiotic that can boost immunity, supply an enzyme for food digestion, and improve feed intake [108]. In a study, the effect of adding 10% or 20% torula yeasts to a fishmeal-free diet on the digestibility and growth of juvenile rainbow trout was evaluated. The results of this study showed that when fed a diet devoid of fishmeal, torula yeast (C. utilis) may help rainbow trout grow more robustly [6]. Brewer’s yeast significantly decreased digestibility coefficients of dry matter, protein, and energy in sea bass juveniles when fishmeal was partially replaced with yeast [15]. Arctic char had lower energy and amino acid digestibility than extracted S. cerevisiae, but there was no significant difference in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) [41]. This demonstrates variances in digestive efficiency among species, probably related to varying gastrointestinal enzyme activity [128]. In studies with Atlantic salmon, the replacement of 40% of low temperature (LT) fishmeal with C. utilis or K. marxianus yeast had no significant effect on the digestibility of crude protein and energy, whereas the substitution with S. cerevisiae significantly reduced protein and energy digestibility [36]. Protein digestibility in Atlantic salmon was further enhanced by the improved solubility of proteins and β-glucans resulting from distinct downstream processing techniques of the yeast S. cerevisiae [127]. The digestibilities of individual amino acids were also unaffected by the dietary inclusion of C. utilis and K. marxianus, except for a reduced digestibility of methionine and cysteine in the K. marxianus diet. Conversely, the diet containing S. cerevisiae revealed significantly lower amino acid digestibility than the fishmeal control except for glycine and cysteine [36]. The latter study [15] indicated considerable differences in digestibility among different whole-cell yeast products. The enzymatic hydrolysis of cell wall rupture can improve the digestibility of yeast nutrients [109]. Moreover, by removing the cell wall material, which is a representation of the water-soluble cell contents, yeast can be extracted from lignocellulosic biomass and used as aquaculture feed. Since cell walls are removed and there is a greater amount of water-soluble low molecular weight proteins in the diet, adding more yeast extract in place of fishmeal in shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) diets increased the apparent digestibility of protein [129]. The extrusion of feed may cause partial disruption of yeast cell walls and potentially increase protein and amino acid digestibility [130]. Enhanced growth performance and health in fish fed on yeast might also be attributed to the improved digestive enzyme activity [111] and by supplying digestive enzymes that aid in the digestion of complex carbohydrates, [131] or by enhancing digestive capacity by improving gastrointestinal morphology and thereby increasing the absorptive surface [36,109,111].

7. Use of Yeast in Live Aquafeed Culture

The significant advancements in technology for larval rearing, along with the global proliferation of hatcheries, necessitate the use of appropriate rotifer culture techniques as a vital source of larval nourishment. Rotifers (Brachionus sp.) are supplied as a living capsule, providing the necessary nutrients for the proper growth and production of cultivated fish larvae [132]. In addition, rotifers are the most important live-feeding species utilized in the rearing of fish larvae because of their size, nutritional content, and behavior [18,133]. Furthermore, it has been proved by many researchers that a medium including yeast, starch, and albumen is suitable for the rotifer culture. In addition, by using yeasts in aquaculture, copepods, artemia, and rotifers can be produced along with live aquafeed [18]. Moreover, Artemia nauplii is now one of the most dependable live feeds for fish and is frequently utilized to nourish young aquatic species raised in aquaculture [134]. However, the amount of yeast used in rotifer culture varies greatly due to insufficient information on feeding rate, frequency, and composition range [135]. Through the use of a somewhat diet-dependent procedure with variable yeast amounts, the ideal feeding rate and frequency for Brachionus plicatilis was found [136]. The results showed that the feeding rate of the rotifers is sufficient at an average of 0.3 g of barker yeast per million rotifers. Additionally, increasing the feeding frequency can lead to a higher population growth rate and egg-bearing ratio, with an increase from twice to three times [136]. According to a study, yeast works better for Rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus cultures when combined with fresh Chlorella compared to powdered Chlorella. It is advised that better raising conditions will enable good rotifer development when the food contains both fresh Chlorella and yeast [133]. Furthermore, research has demonstrated that yeast increases the density of copepods in culture, suggesting that it could one day be used as a supplement to feed for additional copepod species [137]. According to other studies, the maximum relative population density of copepods has been reached when compared to marine microalgae when copepods are fed commercial S. cerevisiae baker’s yeast with a soybean component [138]. Therefore, in the cultivation of live food, yeast is recommended as a supplement or protein alternative.
The application of live feed is a standard part of the production of some fish species, which is important from both a commercial and a nature conservation standpoint. The results of the experiments outlined above clearly demonstrate that yeast products are an excellent source of nutrition for rotifers and microcrustaceans used as live food.

8. Conclusions and Aspects of Future Research

In conclusion, the use of yeast as a primary protein-rich feed additive, supplement, and probiotic has the potential to provide the necessary solutions to meet current and future market demands and address issues associated with the production of several valuable species for the future of the aquaculture sector. Furthermore, the current investigation has demonstrated that the addition of yeast to the diets of several fish species can enhance their growth, immunity, and efficiency in utilizing nutrients. Our review of the literature indicates that the addition of yeast to fish feed, either directly or as a supplement, can facilitate growth, improve digestive efficiency, and bolster immune systems. Furthermore, the use of yeast as a probiotic can enhance immune systems and improve water quality, thereby increasing yield. However, to maximize growth, survival, and health outcomes, it is recommended to use probiotics in exploitable species. Furthermore, yeast is regarded as a viable option for live aquafeed and aquaculture. It is not recommended to substitute all other protein sources in aquafeed with yeast proteins, as this could have adverse effects on certain fish species and pose potential health risks to consumers.
However, the efficacy of yeast as a primary protein source in fish diets is still under investigation, and further research is necessary. Yeast products have been shown to have a protein digestibility that is similar to that of conventional protein sources when incorporated into the diets of different fish species. However, there is a lack of research comparing the digestibility of different yeasts in the same experiment. To compete with fishmeal in the aquaculture sector and become a reasonably priced alternative for fish farmers, large-scale investment is required for yeast production. This would also help to reduce their dependency on fishmeal. While yeast can be used as a protein source in aquafeed, there is currently limited knowledge regarding its safety. To prioritize the development of potential ways that address fish and environmental safety and human health, more scientific research on the use of yeast in the aquaculture industry is required. Future research should focus on understanding the specific nutritional needs of cultured aquatic species at different stages and developing affordable dry feeds that the industry can use.

Author Contributions

C.H., conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation; S.S. and B.K., writing—original draft preparation; J.B., writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA); FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022; p. 266. [Google Scholar]
  2. Reverter, M.; Tapissier-Bontemps, N.; Sarter, S.; Sasal, P.; Caruso, D. Moving towards more sustainable aquaculture practices: A meta-analysis on the potential of plant-enriched diets to improve fish growth, immunity and disease resistance. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 537–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Agboola, J.; Schiavone, M.; Øverland, M.; Morales-Lange, B.; Lagos, L.; Arntzen, M.Ø.; Lapeña, D.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Horn, S.J.; Mydland, L.T.; et al. Impact of Down-Stream Processing on Functional Properties of Yeasts in Diets of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar): Implications for Gut Health. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4496. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jia, S.; Li, X.; He, W.; Wu, G. Protein-Sourced Feedstuffs for Aquatic Animals in Nutrition Research and Aquaculture. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Dong, H., Radeke, H.H., Rezaei, N., Steinlein, O., Xiao, J., Rosenhouse-Dantsker, A., Gerlai, R., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; Volume 1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. IFFO. Marine Ingredients Organization, Statistical Yearbook 2019. Marine Ingredients Organization. 2019. Available online: https://www.iffo.com/feeding-growing-population (accessed on 6 August 2024).
  6. Ekmay, R.D.; Plagnes-juan, E.; Aguirre, P.; Surget, A.; Terrier, F.; Frohn, L.; Skiba-Cassy, S. Partially replacing plant protein sources with torula yeast in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) feed increases growth and factors related to immune status. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2024, 55, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Agboola, J.O.; Øverland, M.; Skrede, A.; Hansen, J.Ø. Yeast as major protein-rich ingredient in aquafeeds: A review of the implications for aquaculture production. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 949–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hou, Y.; He, W.; Hu, S.; Wu, G. Composition of polyamines and amino acids in plant-source foods for human consumption. Amino Acids 2019, 51, 1153–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dossou, S.; Koshio, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Yokoyama, S.; Dawood, M.A.O.; Basuini, M.F.E.; Olivier, A.; Zaineldin, A.I. Growth performance, blood health, antioxidant status and immune response in red sea bream (Pagrus major) fed Aspergillus oryzae fermented rapeseed meal (RM-Koji). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 75, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018—Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals; FAO Fisheries: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  11. Froehlich, H.E.; Jacobsen, N.S.; Essington, T.E.; Clavelle, T.; Halpern, B.S. Avoiding the ecological limits of forage fish for fed aquaculture. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hua, K.; Cobcroft, J.M.; Cole, A.; Condon, K.; Jerry, D.R.; Mangott, A.; Praeger, C.; Vucko, M.J.; Zheng, C.; Zenger, K.; et al. The future of aquatic protein: Implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth 2019, 1, 316–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Richard, N.; Costas, B.; Machado, M.; Fernández-Boo, S.; Girons, A.; Dias, J.; Corraze, G.; Terrier, F.; Marchand, Y.; Skiba-Cassy, S. Inclusion of a protein-rich yeast fraction in rainbow trout plant-based diet: Consequences on growth performances, flesh fatty acid profile and health-related parameters. Aquaculture 2021, 544, 737132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Glencross, B.D.; Huyben, D.; Schrama, J.W. The application of single-cell ingredients in aquaculture feeds—a review. Fishes 2020, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Øverland, M.; Skrede, A. Yeast derived from lignocellulosic biomass as a sustainable feed resource for use in aquaculture. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dawood, M.A.O.; Koshio, S.; Ishikawa, M.; Yokoyama, S.; Basuini, E.; Hossain, M.S.; Nhu, T.H.; Moss, A.S.; Dossou, S.; Wei, H. Dietary supplementation of β-glucan improves growth performance, the innate immune response and stress resistance of red sea bream, Pagrus major. Aquac. Nutr. 2017, 23, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abu-Elala, N.M.; El-Sayed Ali, T.; Ragaa, N.M.; Ali, S.E.; Abd-Elsalam, R.M.; Younis, N.A.; Abdel-Moneam, D.A.; Hamdien, A.H.; Bonato, M.; Dawood, M.A.O. Analysis of the Productivity, Immunity, and Health Performance of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Broodstock-fed Dietary Fermented Extracts Sourced from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Hilyses): A Field Trial. Animals 2021, 11, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mahdy, M.A.; Jamal, M.T.; Al-Harb, M.; Al-Mur, B.A.; Haque, M.F. Use of yeasts in aquaculture nutrition and immunostimulation: A review. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, X. Notes from the Aquaculture Statistician. FAO Aquac. Newsl. 2018, 58, 6–8. [Google Scholar]
  20. Torrecillas, S.; Montero, D.; Izquierdo, M. Improved health and growth of fish fed mannan oligosaccharides: Potential mode of action. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 36, 525–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmadifar, E.; Moghadam, M.S.; Dawood, M.A.O.; Hoseinifar, S.H. Lactobacillus fermentum and/or ferulic acid improved the immune responses, antioxidative defence and resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 94, 916–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dawood, M.A.O.; Magouz, F.I.; Mansour, M.; Saleh, A.A.; Asely, A.M.E.; Fadl, S.E.; Ahmed, H.A.; Al-Ghanim, K.A.; Mahboob, S.; Al-Misned, F. Evaluation of yeast fermented poultry by-product meal in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) feed: Effects on growth performance, digestive enzymes activity, innate immunity, and antioxidant capacity. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 6, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Navarrete, P.; Tovar-Ramírez, D. Use of yeasts as probiotics in fish aquaculture. Sustain. Aquac. Tech. 2014, 1, 135–172. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nathanailides, C.; Kolygas, M.; Choremi, K.; Mavraganis, T.; Gouva, E.; Vidalis, K.; Athanassopoulou, F. Probiotics Have the Potential to Significantly Mitigate the Environmental Impact of Freshwater Fish Farms. Fishes 2021, 6, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schiavone, M.; Vax, A.; Formosa, C.; Martin-Yken, H.; Dague, E.; François, J.M. A combined chemical and enzymatic method to determine quantitatively the polysaccharide components in the cell wall of yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014, 14, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rawling, M.; Leclercq, E.; Foey, A.; Castex, M.; Merrifield, D. A novel dietary multi-strain yeast fraction modulates intestinal toll-like-receptor signalling and mucosal responses of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0245021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rawling, M.; Schiavone, M.; Apper, E.; Merrifield, D.L.; Castex, M.; Leclercq, E.; Foey, A. Yeast cell wall extracts from Saccharomyces cerevisiae varying in structure and composition differentially shape the innate immunity and mucosal tissue responses of the intestine of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1158390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bertolo, A.P.; Biz, A.P.; Kempka, A.P.; Rigo, E.; Cavalheiro, D. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae): Evaluation of cellular disruption processes, chemical composition, functional properties and digestibility. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 3697–3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hicks, T.M.; Verbeek, C.J.R. Meat Industry Protein by-Products: Sources and Characteristics. In Protein Byproducts; Dhillon, G.D., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 37–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cuppett, S.L.; Soares, J.H. The metabolizable energy values and digestibilities of menhaden fish meal, fish solubles and fish oils. Poult. Sci. 1972, 51, 2078–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, P.; He, W.; Wu, G. Composition of amino acids in foodstuffs for humans and animals. In Amino Acids in Nutrition and Health; Wu, G., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 189–210. [Google Scholar]
  32. Deng, Y.; Borewicz, K.; van Loo, J.; Olabarrieta, M.Z.; Kokou, F.; Sipkema, D.; Verdegem, M.C.J. In-Situ Biofloc Affects the Core Prokaryotes Community Composition in Gut and Enhances Growth of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Microb. Ecol. 2022, 84, 879–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bardhan, P.; Gupta, K.; Kishor, S.; Chattopadhyay, P.; Chaliha, C.; Kalita, E.; Goud, V.V.; Mandal, M. Oleaginous yeasts isolated from traditional fermented foods and beverages of Manipur and Mizoram, India, as a potent source of microbial lipids for biodiesel production. Ann. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Parolini, G. Building Human and Industrial Capacity in European Biotechnology: The Yeast Genome. Biotechnology 1996, 16, 365–368. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shurson, G.C. Yeast and yeast derivatives in feed additives and ingredients: Sources, characteristics, animal responses, and quantification methods. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018, 235, 60–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Øverland, M.; Karlsson, A.; Mydland, L.T.; Romarheim, O.H.; Skrede, A. Evaluation of Candida utilis, Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts as protein sources in diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2013, 402, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lapeña, D.; Olsen, P.M.; Arntzen, M.Ø.; Kosa, G.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Horn, S.J. Spruce sugars and poultry hydrolysate as growth medium in repeated fed-batch fermentation processes for production of yeast biomass. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 43, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Adeshina, I.; Issa, Z.A. Antioxidants and immune responses, resistance to Aspergilus flavus infection, and growth performance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, fed diets supplemented with yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2020, 263, 114484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Vidakovic, A.; Huyben, D.; Sundh, H.; Nyman, A.; Vielma, J.; Passoth, V.; Kiessling, A.; Lundh, T. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphology of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed graded levels of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Wickerhamomyces anomalus. Aquac. Nutr. 2020, 26, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abass, D.A.; Obirikorang, K.A.; Campion, B.B.; Edziyie, R.E.; Skov, P.V. Dietary supplementation of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) improves growth, stress tolerance, and disease resistance in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquac. Int. 2018, 26, 843–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vidakovic, A.; Langeland, M.; Sundh, H.; Sundell, K.; Olstorpe, M.; Vielma, J.; Kiessling, A.; Lundh, T. Evaluation of growth performance and intestinal barrier function in Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus) fed yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), fungi (Rhizopus oryzae) and blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Aquac. Nutr. 2016, 22, 1348–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Banu, M.R.; Akter, S.; Islam, M.R.; Mondol, M.N.; Hossain, M.A. Probiotic yeast enhanced growth performance and disease resistance in freshwater catfish gulsa tengra, Mystus cavasius. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 16, 100237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ozório, R.O.A.; Portz, L.; Borghesi, R.; Cyrino, J.E.P. Effects of dietary yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisia) supplementation in practical diets of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals 2012, 2, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yones, A.-M.M.; Hussein, M.S.; Ali, M.W.; Abdel-Azem, A.-A.M. Effect of dietary Lacto cel-con probiotic on growth performance and hematology indices of fingerlings mono-sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Egypt. J. Aquat. Biol. Fish. 2019, 23, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El-Bab, A.F.F.; Saghir, S.A.M.; El-Naser, I.A.A.; El-Kheir, S.M.M.A.; Abdel-Kader, M.F.; Alruhaimi, R.S.; Alqhtani, H.A.; Mahmoud, A.M.; Naiel, M.A.E.; El-Raghi, A.A. The effect of dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae on growth performance, oxidative status, and immune response of sea bream (Sparus aurata). Life 2022, 12, 1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O.; Pinho, O.; Vieira, E.; Tavarela, J.G. Brewer’s Saccharomyces yeast biomass: Characteristics and potential applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pradhan, D.; Swain, H.S.; Upadhyay, A.; Sahu, B.; Nanda, S.; Patra, S.K.; Kasturi, S.; Mohanta, K.N.; Giri, S.S. On Valorization of Brewer’s Yeast as an Environmentally Sustainable Fishmeal Replacement in Labeo rohita Nutrition: Insight to Growth Attributes, Digestive Enzyme Activities and Haemato-biochemical Indices. Waste Biomass Valorization 2024, 15, 3503–3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pongpet, J.; Ponchunchoovong, S.; Payooha, K. Partial replacement of fishmeal by brewer’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) in the diets of Thai Panga (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus× Pangasius bocourti). Aquac. Nutr. 2016, 22, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rosales, M.; Castillo, S.; Pohlenz, C.; Gatlin, D.M., III. Evaluation of dried yeast and threonine fermentation biomass as partial fish meal replacements in the diet of red drum Sciaenops ocellatus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017, 232, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hao, Q.; Xia, R.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, Y.; Ran, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Chu, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; et al. Partially replacing dietary fish meal by Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture improve growth performance, immunity, disease resistance, composition and function of intestinal microbiota in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 125, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Andriamialinirina, H.J.T.; Irm, M.; Taj, S.; Lou, J.H.; Jin, M.; Zhou, Q. The effects of dietary yeast hydrolysate on growth, hematology, antioxidant enzyme activities and non-specific immunity of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 101, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, M.; Chen, X.-Q.; Tian, L.-X.; Liu, Y.-J.; Niu, J. Enhanced intestinal health, immune responses and ammonia resistance in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) fed dietary hydrolyzed yeast (Rhodotorula mucilaginosa) and Bacillus licheniformis. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 17, 100385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rimoldi, S.; Gini, E.; Koch, J.F.A.; Iannini, F.; Brambilla, F.; Terova, G. Erratum: Effects of hydrolyzed fish protein and autolyzed yeast as substitutes of fishmeal in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) diet, on fish intestinal microbiome. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 118, Erratum in BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02416-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gong, Y.; Yang, F.; Hu, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, H.; Han, D.; Jin, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Yi, J.; et al. Effects of dietary yeast hydrolysate on the growth, antioxidant response, immune response and disease resistance of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 94, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ma, Y.; Li, L.-Y.; Li, M.; Chen, W.; Bao, P.-Y.; Yu, Z.-C.; Chang, Y.-Q. Effects of dietary probiotic yeast on growth parameters in juvenile sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus. Aquaculture 2019, 499, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jarmołowicz, S.; Rożyński, M.; Kowalska, A.; Zakęś, Z. Growth in juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) stimulated with yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, extract. Aquac. Res. 2018, 49, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, P.; Cao, S.; Zou, T.; Han, D.; Liu, H.; Jin, J.; Yang, Y.; Zou, X.; Xie, S.; Zhou, W. Effects of dietary yeast culture on growth performance, immune response and disease resistance of gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio CAS III). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 82, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Yuan, X.-Y.; Liu, W.-B.; Liang, C.; Sun, C.-X.; Xue, Y.-F.; Wan, Z.-D.; Jiang, G.-Z. Effects of partial replacement of fish meal by yeast hydrolysate on complement system and stress resistance in juvenile Jian carp (Cyprinus carpio var. Jian). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 67, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gumus, E.; Aydin, B.; Kanyilmaz, M. Growth and feed utilization of goldfish (Carassius auratus) fed graded levels of brewer’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2016, 15, 1124–1133. [Google Scholar]
  60. Yu, H.H.; Han, F.; Xue, M.; Wang, J.; Tacon, P.; Zheng, Y.H.; Wu, X.F.; Zhang, Y.J. Efficacy and tolerance of yeast cell wall as an immunostimulant in the diet of Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus). Aquaculture 2014, 432, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Peterson, B.C.; Booth, N.J.; Manning, B.B. Replacement of fish meal in juvenile channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, diets using a yeast-derived protein source: The effects on weight gain, food conversion ratio, body composition and survival of catfish challenged with Edwardsiella ictaluri. Aquac. Nutr. 2012, 18, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Goda, A.M.A.; Mabrouk, H.A.-H.H.; Wafa, M.A.E.-H.; El-Afifi, T.M. Effect of using baker’s yeast and exogenous digestive enzymes as growth promoters on growth, feed utilization and hematological indices of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. B 2012, 2, 15–28. [Google Scholar]
  63. Gause, B.; Trushenski, J. Replacement of fish meal with ethanol yeast in the diets of sunshine bass. N. Am. J. Aquac. 2011, 73, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Enes, P.; Panserat, S.; Kaushik, S.; Oliva-Teles, A. Dietary carbohydrate utilization by European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) and gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) juveniles. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2011, 19, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hoseinifar, S.H.; Mirvaghefi, A.; Merrifield, D.L. The effects of dietary inactive brewer’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. ellipsoideus on the growth, physiological responses and gut microbiota of juvenile beluga (Huso huso). Aquaculture 2011, 318, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lunger, A.N.; Craig, S.R.; McLean, E. Replacement of fish meal in cobia (Rachycentron canadum) diets using an organically certified protein. Aquaculture 2006, 257, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, P.; Gatlin, D.M., III. Evaluation of brewer’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed supplement for hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops× M. saxatilis). Aquaculture 2003, 219, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Long, M.; Lin, W.; Hou, J.; Gou, H.; Li, L.; Li, D.; Tang, R.; Yang, F. Dietary supplementation with selenium yeast and tea polyphenols improve growth performance and nitrite tolerance of Wuchang bream (Megalobrama amblycephala). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 68, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cotter, P.A.; Craig, S.R.; McLean, E. Hyperaccumulation of selenium in hybrid striped bass: A functional food for aquaculture? Aquac. Nutr. 2008, 14, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, L.; Zhang, X.; Wu, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, D.; Yin, J. Expression of selenoprotein genes in muscle is crucial for the growth of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed diets supplemented with selenium yeast. Aquaculture 2018, 492, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ren, X.; Huang, D.; Si, G.; Chen, J. Replacement of fish meal with gamma-ray irradiated soybean meal in the diets of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Aquac. Nutr. 2021, 27, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, Y.; Ma, X.Z.; Wang, F.; Wu, Y.B.; Qin, J.G.; Li, P. Supplementations of poultry by-product meal and selenium yeast increase fish meal replacement by soybean meal in golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) diet. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 1904–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, Y.; Fang, H.; Ma, H.; Wang, X. Supplementation of Selenium-Yeast Enhances Fishmeal Replacement by Soy Protein Concentrate in Diets for Golden Pompano (Trachinotus ovatus). Aquac. Res. 2023, 2023, 8953076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dawood, M.A.O.; Magouz, F.I.; Essa, M.; Mansour, M. Impact of Yeast Fermented Poultry by-Product Meal on Growth, Digestive Enzyme Activities, Intestinal Morphometry and Immune Response Traits of Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio). Ann. Anim. Sci. 2020, 20, 939–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bob-Manuel, F.G. A comparative study of the effect of yeast single cell protein on growth, feed utilization and condition factor of the African catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell) and tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus) fingerlings. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2014, 9, 2005–2011. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yousefi, S.; Shokri, M.M.; Navirian, H.A.; Hoseinifar, S.H. Effects of yeast cell membrane prebiotic (Immunowall®) on growth performance and hematological parameters in juvenile Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus). J. Anim. Environ. 2020, 12, 221–228. [Google Scholar]
  77. Khalil, H.S.; Mansour, A.T.; Goda, A.M.A.; Omar, E.A. Effect of selenium yeast supplementation on growth performance, feed utilization, lipid profile, liver and intestine histological changes, and economic benefit in meagre, Argyrosomus regius, fingerlings. Aquaculture 2019, 501, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hassaan, M.S.; Soltan, M.A.; Mohammady, E.Y.; Elashry, M.A.; El-Haroun, E.R.; Davies, S.J. Growth and physiological responses of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus fed dietary fermented sunflower meal inoculated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Bacillus subtilis. Aquaculture 2018, 495, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tavana, B.G.Z.; Banaee, M.; Jourdehi, A.Y.; Haghi, B.N.; Hassani, M.H.S. Effects of dietary Sel-Plex supplement on growth performance, hematological and immunological parameters in Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869). Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2019, 18, 830–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ezenwaji, N.E.; Iluno, A.; Atama, C.; Nwaigwe, C.O.; Nwaigwe, C.U. Substitution of soyabean meal with bioactive yeast in the diet of Clarias gariepinus: Effect on growth rate, haematological and biochemical profile. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 15802–15810. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hauptman, B.S.; Barrows, F.T.; Block, S.S.; Gaylord, T.G.; Paterson, J.A. Evaluation of grain distillers dried yeast as a fish meal substitute in practical-type diets of juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 2014, 432, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Plaipetch, P.; Yakupitiyage, A. Effect of replacing soybean meal with yeast-fermented canola meal on growth and nutrient retention of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus 1758). Aquac. Res. 2014, 45, 1744–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ma, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Li, M.; Liu, J.; Song, J. Effects of dietary live yeast Hanseniaspora opuntiae C21 on the immune and disease resistance against Vibrio splendidus infection in juvenile sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 34, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Plaipetch, P.; Yakupitiyage, A. Use of yeast-fermented canola meal to replace fishmeal in the diet of Asian sea bass Lates calcarifer (Bloch, 1790). J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2012, 3, 1000125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Trosvik, K.A.; Rawles, S.D.; Thompson, K.R.; Metts, L.A.; Gannam, A.; Twibell, R.; Webster, C.D. Growth and body composition of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, fry fed organic diets containing yeast extract and soybean meal as replacements for fish meal, with and without supplemental lysine and methionine. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2012, 43, 635–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Buentello, J.A.; Neill, W.H.; Gatlin, D.M., III. Effects of dietary prebiotics on the growth, feed efficiency and non-specific immunity of juvenile red drum Sciaenops ocellatus fed soybean-based diets. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ebrahim, M.S.M.; Abou-Seif, R.A. Fish Meal Replacement by Yeast Protein (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Supplemented with Biogenic L-Carintine as a Source of Methionine Plus Lysine Mixture in Feed for Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Fingerlinges. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture 2008, Cairo, Egypt, 12–14 October 2008; pp. 999–1099. Available online: http://ag.arizona.edu/azaqua/ista/ISTA8/FinalPapers/11Nutrition/PDF/22Ramadan.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2024).
  88. Ghosh, K.; Sen, S.K.; Ray, A.K. Feed Utilization Efficiency and Growth Performance in Rohu, Supplemented Diets. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat. 2005, 35, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Muzinic, L.A.; Thompson, K.R.; Morris, A.; Webster, C.D.; Rouse, D.B.; Manomaitis, L. Partial and total replacement of fish meal with soybean meal and brewer’s grains with yeast in practical diets for Australian red claw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Aquaculture 2004, 230, 359–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ziarati, M.; Zorriehzahra, M.J.; Hassantabar, F.; Mehrabi, Z.; Dhawan, M.; Shraun, K.; Emran, T.B.; Dhama, K.; Chaicumpa, W.; Shamsi, S. Zoonotic diseases of fish and their prevention and control. Vet. Q. 2022, 42, 95–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Hill, C.; Guarner, F.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Merenstein, D.J.; Pot, B.; Morelli, L.; Canani, R.B.; Flint, H.J.; Salminen, S.; et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 11, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Mocanu, E.E.; Savin, V.; Popa, M.D.; Dima, F.M. The Effect of Probiotics on Growth Performance, Haematological and Biochemical Profiles in Siberian Sturgeon (Acipenser baerii Brandt, 1869). Fishes 2022, 7, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kwasek, K.; Thorne-Lyman, A.L.; Phillips, M. Can human nutrition be improved through better fish feeding practices? a review paper. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3822–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bunnoy, A.; Yanglang, A.; Tribamrung, N.; Keawthong, C.; Tumree, P.; Kumwan, B.; Meachasompop, P.; Saengrung, J.; Vanichvatin, K.; Muangrerk, C.; et al. Dietary administration of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) hydrolysate from sugar byproducts promotes the growth, survival, immunity, microbial community and disease resistance to VP (AHPND) in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2024, 145, 109327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Da Silva Berto, R.; Pereira, G.D.V.; Mouriño, J.L.P.; Martins, M.L.; Fracalossi, D.M. Yeast extract on growth, nutrient utilization and haemato-immunological responses of Nile tilapia. Aquac. Res. 2016, 47, 2650–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lazo-Vélez, M.A.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O.; Rosales-Medina, M.F.; Tinoco-Alvear, M.; Briones-García, M. Application of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii in food processing: A review. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 943–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ansari, F.; Samakkhah, S.A.; Bahadori, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Ziaee, M.; Khodayari, M.T.; Pourjafar, H. Health-promoting properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii as a probiotic; characteristics, isolation, and applications in dairy products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 457–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sharifuzzaman, S.M.; Austin, B. Probiotics for disease control in aquaculture. In Diagnosis and Control of Diseases of Fish and Shellfish; Austin, B., Newaj-Fyzul, A., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 189–222. [Google Scholar]
  99. Darafsh, F.; Soltani, M.; Abdolhay, H.A.; Mehrejan, M.S. Improvement of growth performance, digestive enzymes and body composition of Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) following feeding on probiotics: Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus subtilis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 957–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Saba, A.O.; Yasin, I.S.M.; Azmai, M.N.A. Meta-analyses indicate that dietary probiotics significantly improve growth, immune response, and disease resistance in tilapia. Aquac. Int. 2024, 32, 4841–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Noman, M.; Kazmi, S.S.U.H.; Saqib, H.S.A.; Fiaz, U.; Pastorino, P.; Barcelò, D.; Tayyab, M.; Liu, W.; Wang, Z.; Yaseen, Z.M. Harnessing probiotics and prebiotics as eco-friendly solution for cleaner shrimp aquaculture production: A state of the art scientific consensus. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 915, 169921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wang, J.; Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Xiao, S. Effect of potential probiotic Rhodotorula benthica D30 on the growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and immunity in juvenile sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015, 43, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pourgholam, M.A.; Khara, H.; Safari, R.; Sadati, M.A.Y.; Aramli, M.S. Influence of Lactobacillus plantarum inclusion in the diet of Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) on performance and hematological parameters. Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2017, 17, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  104. Hai, N.V. The use of probiotics in aquaculture. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 119, 917–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rohani, M.F.; Islam, S.M.; Hossain, M.K.; Ferdous, Z.; Siddik, M.A.; Nuruzzaman, M.; Padeniya, U.; Brown, C.; Shahjahan, M. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics improved the functionality of aquafeed: Upgrading growth, reproduction, immunity and disease resistance in fish. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 120, 569–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Guluarte, C.; Reyes-Becerril, M.; Gonzalez-Silvera, D.; Cuesta, A.; Angulo, C.; Esteban, M.Á. Probiotic properties and fatty acid composition of the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis M3. In vivo immunomodulatory activities in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 94, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Pooramini, M.; Kamali, A.; Hajimoradloo, A.; Alizadeh, M.; Ghorbani, R. Effect of using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as probiotic on growth parameters, survival and carcass quality in rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss fry. Int. Aquat. Res. 2009, 1, 39. [Google Scholar]
  108. Pratiwy, F.M.; Kharima, Z.P. The Use of Bread Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) in Increasing Growth, Disease Resistance, and as Immunostimulating for Various Kinds of Fish: A Review. Asian J. Fish. Aquat. Res. 2022, 20, 64–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Tukmechi, A.; Bandboni, M. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on immune response, hematological parameters, body composition and disease resistance in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum, 1792). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2014, 30, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. El-Boshy, M.E.; Ahmed, M.; AbdelHamid, F.M.; Gadalla, H.A. Immunomodulatory effect of dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae, β-glucan and laminaran in mercuric chloride treated Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and experimentally infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010, 28, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Sheikhzadeh, N.; Heidarieh, M.; Pashaki, A.K.; Nofouzi, K.; Farshbafi, M.A.; Akbari, M. Hilyses®, fermented Saccharomyces cerevisiae, enhances the growth performance and skin non-specific immune parameters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 32, 1083–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Maccaferri, S.; Klinder, A.; Brigidi, P.; Cavina, P.; Costabile, A. Potential probiotic Kluyveromyces marxianus B0399 modulates the immune response in Caco-2 cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells and impacts the human gut microbiota in an in vitro colonic model system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 956–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Ferreira, S.S.; Passos, C.P.; Madureira, P.; Vilanova, M.; Coimbra, M.A. Structure–function relationships of immunostimulatory polysaccharides: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 132, 378–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Rodrigues, M.V.; Zanuzzo, F.S.; Koch, J.F.A.; de Oliveira, C.A.F.; Sima, P.; Vetvicka, V. Development of fish immunity and the role of β-glucan in immune responses. Molecules 2020, 25, 5378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Voloski, A.P.D.S.; de Figueiredo Soveral, L.; Dazzi, C.C.; Sutili, F.; Frandoloso, R.; Kreutz, L.C. β-Glucan improves wound healing in silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 93, 575–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Divya, M.; Gopi, N.; Iswarya, A.; Govindarajan, M.; Alharbi, N.S.; Kadaikunnan, S.; Khaled, J.M.; Almanaa, T.N.; Vaseeharan, B. β-glucan extracted from eukaryotic single-celled microorganism Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Dietary supplementation and enhanced ammonia stress tolerance on Oreochromis mossambicus. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 139, 103917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Guzmán-Villanueva, L.T.; Ascencio-Valle, F.; Macías-Rodríguez, M.E.; Tovar-Ramírez, D. Effects of dietary β-1, 3/1, 6-glucan on the antioxidant and digestive enzyme activities of Pacific red snapper (Lutjanus peru) after exposure to lipopolysaccharides. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 40, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Reyes-Becerril, M.; Angulo, M.; Sanchez, V.; Guluarte, C.; Angulo, C. β-D-glucan from marine yeast Debaryomyces hansenii BCS004 enhanced intestinal health and glucan-expressed receptor genes in Pacific red snapper Lutjanus peru. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 143, 104141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Machuca, C.; Méndez-Martínez, Y.; Reyes-Becerril, M.; Angulo, C. Yeast β-Glucans as Fish Immunomodulators: A Review. Animals 2022, 12, 2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Pionnier, N.; Falco, A.; Miest, J.J.; Shrive, A.K.; Hoole, D. Feeding common carp Cyprinus carpio with β-glucan supplemented diet stimulates C-reactive protein and complement immune acute phase responses following PAMPs injection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 39, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Tungland, B. Human Microbiota in Health and Disease: From Pathogenesis to Therapy; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  122. Rawling, M.D.; Pontefract, N.; Rodiles, A.; Anagnostara, I.; Leclercq, E.; Schiavone, M.; Castex, M.; Merrifield, D. The effect of feeding a novel multistrain yeast fraction on European seabass (Dicentrachus labrax) intestinal health and growth performance. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2019, 50, 1108–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yousuf, S.; Tyagi, A.; Singh, R. Probiotic supplementation as an emerging alternative to chemical therapeutics in finfish aquaculture: A Review. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2023, 15, 1151–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Eissa, E.H.; Ahmed, N.H.; El-Badawi, A.A.; Munir, M.B.; Al-Kareem, O.M.A.; Eissa, M.E.H.; Hussien, E.H.M.; Sakr, S.E.-S. Assessing the influence of the inclusion of Bacillus subtilis AQUA-GROW® as feed additive on the growth performance, feed utilization, immunological responses and body composition of the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2022, 53, 6606–6615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Goda, A.M.; Omar, E.A.; Srour, T.M.; Kotiet, A.M.; El-Haroun, E.; Davies, S.J. Effect of diets supplemented with feed additives on growth, feed utilization, survival, body composition and intestinal bacterial load of early weaning European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax post-larvae. Aquac. Int. 2018, 26, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Öztürk, F.; Esendal, Ö.M. Usage of Lactobacillus rhamnosus as a Probiotic in Sea Bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). J. Anatol. Environ. Anim. Sci. 2020, 5, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hansen, J.Ø.; Lagos, L.; Lei, P.; Reveco-Urzua, F.E.; Morales-Lange, B.; Hansen, L.D.; Schiavone, M.; Mydland, L.T.; Arntzen, M.Ø.; Mercado, L. Down-stream processing of baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)—Effect on nutrient digestibility and immune response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2021, 530, 735707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Langeland, M.; Lindberg, J.E.; Lundh, T. Digestive enzyme activity in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2013, 5, 2. [Google Scholar]
  129. Zhao, L.; Wang, W.; Huang, X.; Guo, T.; Wen, W.; Feng, L.; Wei, L. The effect of replacement of fish meal by yeast extract on the digestibility, growth and muscle composition of the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Vidakovic, A.; Huyben, D.; Nyman, A.; Kiessling, A.; Lundh, T. Evaluation of growth performance, nutrient retention and apparent digestibility in rainbow trout (O. mykiss) fed graded levels of yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisae and Wickerhamomyces anomalus. In Proceedings of the Aquaculture Europe 2015 Conference, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 20–23 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  131. Arup, T.; Patra, B.C. Oral administration of baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) acts as a growth promoter and immunomodulator in Labeo rohita (Ham.). J. Aquac. Res. Dev. 2011, 2, 109. [Google Scholar]
  132. Das, J.; Hossain, M.S.; Hasan, J.; Siddique, M.A.M. Growth performance and egg ratio of a marine rotifer Brachionus rotundiformis fed different diets in captivity. Thalass. An. Int. J. Mar. Sci. 2021, 37, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Khatun, B.; Rahman, R.; Rahman, M.S. Evaluation of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and algae Chlorella vulgaris as diet for Rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus. Agriculturists 2014, 12, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Talens-Perales, D.; Marín-Navarro, J.; Garrido, D.; Almansa, E.; Polaina, J. Fixation of bioactive compounds to the cuticle of Artemia. Aquaculture 2017, 474, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ajah, P.O. Mass culture of Rotifera (Brachionus quadridentatus [Hermann, 1783]) using three different algal species. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2010, 4, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  136. Radhakrishnan, K.; Aanand, S.; Rameshkumar, S.; Divya, F. Effect of feeding rate and feeding frequency in mass culture of Brachionus plicatilis in semi-continuous method with a yeast-based diet. J. Fish. Life Sci. 2017, 2, 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  137. Hu, J.; Wang, G.; Huang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, H.; Li, N. Effects of Substitution of Fish Meal with Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Larvae Meal, in Yellow Catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco) Diets. Isr. J. Aquac. 2017, 69, 9. [Google Scholar]
  138. El-Khodary, G.M.; Mona, M.M.; El-Sayed, H.S.; Ghoneim, A.Z. Phylogenetic identification and assessment of the nutritional value of different diets for a copepod species isolated from Eastern Harbor coastal region. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2020, 46, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Signaling pathway for yeast β-glucans in the direction of fish immunization. Figure based on Mahdy et al. Source: [18].
Figure 1. Signaling pathway for yeast β-glucans in the direction of fish immunization. Figure based on Mahdy et al. Source: [18].
Animals 14 02851 g001
Table 1. Chemical composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as yeast meal and fishmeal.
Table 1. Chemical composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as yeast meal and fishmeal.
CompositionSaccharomyces cerevisiae
from Beer Fermentation
Menhaden Fishmeal
Dry matter%9391.2–92
ME (kcal/kg)19903370
Crude protein%44.459–68.5
Crude fat%19.1–10.4
Crude fiber%2.70.9
Ca%0.124.87–5.34
P%1.42.93–3.05
Source: [28,29,30].
Table 2. Yeast species used in aquaculture as a primary protein source to enhance growth performance, disease resistance, and immune system of different fish species.
Table 2. Yeast species used in aquaculture as a primary protein source to enhance growth performance, disease resistance, and immune system of different fish species.
Product NameFish SpeciesInclusion LevelsEffectsSource
Brewer’s yeastLargemouth bass
(Micropterus salmoides)
20, 40, 60 g/kgThe supplementation of S. cerevisiae at 10 g kg−1 did not significantly reduce fishmeal in the diet.[50]
Dietary yeast
polysaccharides
Channel catfish
(Ictalurus punctatus)
20 g/kgThe study found that fish fed experimental diets for 12 weeks significantly improved growth performance compared to the control.[50]
Yeast, Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (SC)
Gilthead sea bream
(Sparus aurata)
1, 2, and 4 g/kgThe study showed that at a dose of 4 g/kg, a meal high in SC dramatically improved growth performance, intestinal morphology, redox homeostasis, and immunological response.[45]
Protein-rich yeast fractionRainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss)
0, 5, 10, or 15%The use of yeasts in 60% of fishmeal protein can cause haemolytic anemia in rainbow trout, potentially restricting their inclusion in farmed fish diets.[13]
Dietary yeast
hydrolysate
Nile tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus)
1 and 3%1% yeast hydrolysate supplementation
enhances growth performance, feed utilization, and antioxidant status.
[51]
Baker’s yeastFreshwater catfish gulsa tengra
(Mystus cavasius)
0.5, 1, and 1.5 g/kgYeast supplement is a potentially
effective growth promoter that could replace antibiotics in the treatment of M. cavasius infections.
[42]
Dietary hydrolyzed yeast Pacific white shrimp
(Litopenaeus vannamei)
1%The study found no significant effect on growth performance or body
composition, but it did affect intestinal health, immunological responses, and ammonia resistance.
[52]
Autolyzed dried yeastGilthead sea bream
(Sparus aurata)
0 and 5%Following a 92-day feeding trial, there were no discernible variations between the dietary groups in terms of fish growth rate, mortality, or feed
efficiency.
[53]
Dietary yeast
hydrolysate
Largemouth bass
(Micropterus salmoides)
0, 1.5, 3.0,
4.5%
Dietary yeast hydrolysate has been found to enhance the antioxidant
capacity and immune response of
largemouth bass without any adverse growth effects.
[54]
Yeast (S. cerevisiae)
Sea cucumber,
(Apostichopus japonicus)
5%The study aimed to enhance the growth, digestive enzyme activity, nutritional value, and immune system of sea
cucumber juveniles.
[55]
Yeast, Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, extract
Juvenile pikeperch
(Sander lucioperca L.)
2, 4, and 6%The study found that pikeperch growth is stimulated by the lowest analyzed dose of yeast, which is 2% yeast extract.[56]
Yeast culture (YC)Gibel carp
(Carassius
auratus gibelio CAS Ⅲ)
0, 20, 40, and 60%The study suggests that yeast culture could be a suitable fishmeal alternative for Gibel carp diets, with a dietary
inclusion of 4 g of yeast culture per 100 g diet.
[57]
Yeast hydrolysate (YH)Juvenile Jian carp
(Cyprinus carpio var. Jian)
1, 3, 5, and 7%The study found that 3% YH was the most effective substitution for fishmeal (FM) in enhancing innate immunity and growth performance.[58]
Dried yeastRed drum
(Sciaenops
ocellatus)
20, 30, 40, 50%Without impairing the red drum’s
functionality, the material may replace between 30 and 50% of the protein
supplied by fishmeal.
[49]
Brewer’s yeast
(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
Thai Panga
(Pangasianodon hypophthalmus ×
Pangasius bocourti)
30, 45, 60,
75%
By substituting brewer’s yeast for 45% of the fishmeal, one can improve the immune response and growth
performance of the Thai Panga.
[48]
Brewer’s yeastGoldfish (Carassius
auratus)
0, 15, 25,
35, and 45%
Fish fed a diet with yeast replacing 35% of their meal showed better weight gain, SGR, FCR, and protein efficiency ratio compared to other diets.[59]
Dietary yeast cell wall (YCW)Japanese seabass (Lateolabrax japonicus)0, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and 20,000 mg/kgThe study found that the optimal dose of YCW is 2000 mg/kg, with a 10 × safety margin.[60]
Yeast
(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
Juvenile channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus)25, 50, 75,
100, and 125 g/kg
The study found that adding up to 100 g kg−1 of dried yeast without affecting growth performance is possible.[61]
Baker yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC)Nile tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings
1 and 2 g/100 g Nile tilapia fingerlings fed a yeast
mixture for 119 days showed improved growth performance, feed efficiency, and
hematological indices.
[62]
Ethanol yeast (EY)Sunshine bass
(female white bass Morone
chrysops × male striped bass M. saxatilis)
0, 7.5, 15%Reductions in carcass protein and
increase in carcass lipid was the results of replacing fishmeal entirely with EY. It also caused changes in whole-body composition.
[63]
Brewer’s yeastSea bass
(Dicentrachus labrax)
0, 10, 20,
30, or 50%
Brewer’s yeast can replace 50% of
fishmeal protein without negative
effects on fish performance and
improve feed efficiency by up to 30% in the diet.
[64]
Brewer’s yeast
(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
Beluga sturgeon
(Huso huso) juveniles
1 and 2%Brewer’s yeast can enhance growth
performance and modify intestinal
microbiota in beluga sturgeon without negatively impacting basic
hematological parameters.
[65]
Yeast-based, certified organic protein sourceCobia
(Rachycentron canadum)
25, 50, 75, and 100%The data indicates that at least 25% of dietary protein can be provided by yeast-based protein in diets for cobia, despite negative effects on production characteristics.[66]
Brewer’s yeast
(Saccharomyces cerevisiae)
Hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops ×
M. saxatilis)
1, 2, and 4% The growth performance, feed
efficiency, and infection resistance of hybrid striped bass were found to be greatly improved by brewer’s yeast.
[67]
Table 3. Yeast products used in aquaculture as supplementary protein sources to enhance growth performance, disease resistance, and the immune system of several species.
Table 3. Yeast products used in aquaculture as supplementary protein sources to enhance growth performance, disease resistance, and the immune system of several species.
Product NameFish SpeciesInclusion LevelsEffects/OutcomeSource
Torula Yeast
(C. utilis)
Rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss)
10 and 20%The findings of this study suggested that torula yeast (C. utilis) may promote more robust rainbow trout growth when given a diet free of fishmeal.[6]
Selenium yeastGolden pompano
(Trachinotus ovatus)
1 g/kg The study suggests that golden pompano can be reduced in dietary fishmeal to 1 g/kg Selenium-yeast.[73]
Saccharomyces cerevisiae-
fermented
poultry byproduct meal (pbm)
Common carp
(Cyprinus carpio)
0, 5, 10,
15, 20%
The inclusion of 15–20% yeast and fermented poultry byproduct meal in the common carp’s diet has been proven to enhance digestive enzyme activity,
immunological function, and growth.
[74]
Dietary inclusion of
fermented poultry byproduct meal (FPBM)
Nile tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus)
10, 20, 30,
and 40%
To improve tilapia health and growth, 11.17–25.14% of FPBM can be added to their diets in an efficient manner.[22]
Yeast cell wallJuvenile Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus)0.5 and 1%The growth metrics and feeding performance are not significantly affected by the administration of 0.5 and 1%
Immunowall.
[76]
Selenium yeast (Se)Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) fingerlings0.77, 1.51, 2.97, and 3.98 mg /kgTo improve the development
performance, feed utilization, liver and kidney histology, and economic benefits of meagre juveniles, a meal intake of 3.98 mg Se kg−1 (3 mg Se-yeast) is advised.
[77]
Yeast-fermented sunflower meal (YFSFM)Nile tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus)
0, 25, 50, and 75%The varying levels of YFSFM had no
significant effect on the fish’s dry matter, lipid, crude protein, or ash content.
[78]
Selenium yeastSiberian Sturgeon
Acipenser baerii
5, 10, 15 g/kgA food supplement of Sel-Plex at levels ≤15 g kg−1 increased the growth
performance of Siberian sturgeons even though the hematological indicators
improved.
[79]
Substituting soybean meal with yeast
(Sacharomyces cerevisae) meal
African catfish
(Clarias gariepinus)
0, 10, 20,
30, 40, 50, and 100
The diet with a 50% yeast inclusion was deemed optimal due to its enhanced
nutritional status, improved blood
parameters, and enhanced fish health.
[80]
Grain distillers dried yeast (GDDY)Juvenile rainbow trout
(Oncorhynchus mykiss)
0, 25, 37.5, 50, 62.5, 75, 87.5, and 100%Rainbow trout development and feed conversion were highly affected by high GDDY incorporation rates, but feed
intake was not affected.
[81]
Yeast-fermented canola mealNile tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus)
0, 25, 50,
75, and 100%
The study found that replacing fish with 75 and 100% levels significantly reduced their protein efficiency ratio and nutrient digestibility compared to lower levels.[82]
Yeast, Metschnikowia sp. in combination with RhodotorulaJuvenile of sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus)104, 105, and 106 CFU g−1Boost the immune system, boost growth, increase the synthesis of digestive
enzymes, and provide nourishment.
[83]
Yeast-fermented canola mealAsian sea bass
(Lates calcarifer)
25, 50, 75,
100%
The study revealed that yeast-fermented canola meal can replace 50% of fishmeal in the Asian sea bass diet without
affecting growth.
[84]
Fry Fed Organic Diets Containing Yeast Extract (YE)Nile tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus)
0, 15, 30, and 45%Fry fed a control diet with 20% FM and a diet with 45% YE/36%SBM with amino acid supplementation showed no
significant differences in final weight, weight gain, and specific growth rate.
[85]
Ethanol yeastSunshine bass
(Morone chrysops ×
M. saxatilis)
0, 7.5, 15, and 22%According to the study, sunshine bass should be fed ethanol yeast-based diets with an FM level of between 7.5% and 15%.[63]
Dietary supplementation with brewer’s yeast Red drum
(Sciaenops ocellatus)
10 g/kgThe study suggests that a ten-dose dose of several prebiotics is sufficient to
enhance the feed efficiency and disease resistance of red drums.
[86]
Yeast protein Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplemented with biogenic L-carintine Nile tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus)
fingerlings
25, 50, 75, and 100%Tilapia fed a diet containing 7.14 and 10.71% yeast, supplemented with 100 mg/100 g diet, showed optimal growth performance, feed and protein
utilization.
[87]
Yeast extract powder (YEP)Rohu
(Labeo rohita) fingerlings
0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5%Up to a 0.2% margin, the fish fed diets enriched with YEP grew more rapidly than the control group.[88]
Brewer’s grains with yeast (BGY)Australian red claw crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus)10, 20, and 30%The study suggests that soybean meal and BGY can be completely replaced with fish and shrimp meal in the diets of juvenile red claw crayfish.[89]
Table 4. Yeast products used in aquaculture as probiotics to enhance growth performance, disease resistance, and immune system of different species.
Table 4. Yeast products used in aquaculture as probiotics to enhance growth performance, disease resistance, and immune system of different species.
Fish SpeciesInclusion LevelsEffectsSource
Pacific white shrimp
(Litopenaeus vannamei)
10 g/kgAccording to the study, adding yeast byproduct
additions to sugar byproducts may enhance
development, immunity, histological changes, and resistance to the AHPND-causing V. parahaemolyticus.
[94]
Siberian Sturgeon (Acipenser baerii)50% Lactic acid + 50% Saccharomyces boulardiiGrowth indices, survival, and well-being of Acipenser baerii fish were dramatically improved when
probiotics, such as lactic acid bacteria and yeasts, were introduced to their meals.
[92]
Persian sturgeon
(Acipenser persicus)
5 gThis study contributes to the growing literature on the effects of probiotics on the growth, body composition, digestive enzymes, and intestinal morphology of
A. persicus fingerlings.
[99]
Gilthead sea bream
(Sparus aurata)
0.55 or 1.1%The study found that yeast, when consumed at a 0.55 or 1% basal diet, exhibited immunostimulant activity in gilthead seabream.[106]
Rainbow trout,
(Oncorhynchus mykiss fry)
1, 5, and 10%Adding yeast to rainbow trout fry diets during early life stages is suitable, with a 5% concentration likely enhancing growth performance and feed efficiency
ratio.
[107]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sultana, S.; Biró, J.; Kucska, B.; Hancz, C. Factors Affecting Yeast Digestibility and Immunostimulation in Aquatic Animals. Animals 2024, 14, 2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192851

AMA Style

Sultana S, Biró J, Kucska B, Hancz C. Factors Affecting Yeast Digestibility and Immunostimulation in Aquatic Animals. Animals. 2024; 14(19):2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192851

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sultana, Sadia, Janka Biró, Balázs Kucska, and Csaba Hancz. 2024. "Factors Affecting Yeast Digestibility and Immunostimulation in Aquatic Animals" Animals 14, no. 19: 2851. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192851

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop