Distinctive Innovation Capabilities of Argentine Software Companies with High Innovation Results and Impacts
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methods
- Results:
- Products: Introduction of new or significantly enhanced products, degree of novelty of products and changes in the central characteristics of the product.
- Processes: Introduction of new processes and significance of process improvements.
- Organization: Organizational innovations and types of organizational innovations carried out.
- Marketing: Marketing innovations and types of marketing innovations carried out.
- Impacts/performance:
- Performance measures: Sales share percentage of innovated products, impact of product innovations, impact of process innovations, impact of organizational innovations, impact of marketing innovations.
- Generation of intangibles: requested patents, obtained patents, licensed technology, free software licenses use, quality certification.
4. Results
5. Discussion
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abraham, Jay, and Daniel Knight. 2001. Strategic innovation: Leveraging creative action for more profitable growth. Strategy and Leadership 17: 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiken, Michael, and Jerald Hage. 1971. The organic organization and innovation. Sociology 5: 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinwale, Yusuf O., John-Felix K. Akinbami, and Joshua B. Akarakiri. 2018. Factors influencing technology and innovation capability in the Nigerian indigenous oil firms. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research 15: 247–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akman, Gülşen, and Cengiz Yilmaz. 2008. Innovative Capability, Innovation Strategy and Market Orientation: An Empirical Analysis in Turkish Software Industry. International Journal of Innovation Management 12: 69–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amabile, Teresa M., Regina Conti, Heather Coon, Jeffrey Lazenby, and Michael Herron. 1996. Assessing the work environment of creativity. Academy of Management Journal 39: 1154–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amar, Amar D. 2004. Motivating knowledge workers to innovate: A model integrating motivation dynamics and antecedents. European Journal of Innovation Management 7: 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ambrosini, Véronique, Cliff Bowman, and Nardine Collier. 2009. Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management 20: 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aragón-Correa, J. Alberto, and Sanjay Sharma. 2003. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review 28: 71–88. [Google Scholar]
- Aramburu, Nekane, and Josune Sáenz. 2010. Knowledge Sharing in Management Processes: Impact on Innovation Project Management and Innovation Performance. Paper presented at 11th European Conference on Knowledge Management ECKM, Vila Nova de Famalicao, Portugal, September 2–3. [Google Scholar]
- Baker, William, James Sinkula, Amir Grinstein, and Stav Rosenzweig. 2014. The effect of radical innovation in/congruence on new product performance. Industrial Marketing Management 43: 1314–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balzarini, Mónica, Laura González, Margot Tablada, Fernando Casanoves, Julio A. Di Rienzo, and Walter Robledo. 2008. Infostat. Manual del usuario. Córdoba: Editorial Brujas. [Google Scholar]
- Bass, Bernard M. 2000. The Future of Leadership in Learning Organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 7: 18–40. [Google Scholar]
- Benkler, Yochai. 2002. Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal 112: 369–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bigliardi, Barbara, and Francesco Galati. 2016. Which factors hinder the adoption of open innovation in SMEs? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 28: 869–85. [Google Scholar]
- Börjesson, Sofia, and Hans Löfsten. 2012. Capabilities for innovation in small firms—A study of 131 high-tech firms and their relation to performance. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research 6: 149–176. [Google Scholar]
- Brouwer, Erick, and Alfred Kleinknecht. 1999. Innovative output, and a firm’s propensity to patent: an exploration of CIS micro data. Research Policy 28: 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunswicker, Sabine, and Wim Vanhaverbeke. 2015. Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): external knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators. Journal of Small Business Management. forthcoming. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çakar, Nigar Demircan, and Alper Ertürk. 2010. Comparing innovation capability of small and medium-sized enterprises: Examining the effects of organizational culture and empowerment. Journal of Small Business Management 48: 325–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camio, María Isabel, María del Carmen Romero, and María Belén Álvarez. 2015. Índice de nivel de innovación y sus componentes. Estudio en empresas argentinas de software. Paper presented at XVI Congreso da Associação Latino Ibero-Americana de Gestão de Tecnologia (ALTEC), Porto Alegre, Brasil, Octubre. Available online: http://altec2015.nitec.co/altec/papers/857.pdf (accessed on 10 April 2018).
- Camio, María Isabel, Alfredo Rébori, María del Carmen Romero, and María Belén Álvarez. 2016. Innovación y software: Diagnóstico y medición en empresas argentinas, 1st ed. Tandil: Editorial UNICEN. [Google Scholar]
- Capaldo, Guido, Luca Iandoli, Mario Raffa, and Giuseppe Zollo. 2003. The Evaluation of Innovation Capabilities in Small Software Firms: A Methodological Approach. Small Business Economics 21: 343–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, Franklin J., Thani Jambulingam, Vipul K. Gupta, and Nancy Melone. 2001. Technological innovations: A framework for communicating diffusion effects. Information & Management 38: 277–87. [Google Scholar]
- Cavusgil, S. Tamer, Roger J. Calantone, and Yushan Zhao. 2003. Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability. Journal of business & industrial marketing 18: 6–21. [Google Scholar]
- Chandy, Rajesh, and Gerard J. Tellis. 2000. The incumbent's curse? Incumbency, size and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 64: 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Yi-Ying, Yaping Gong, and Mike W. Peng. 2012. Expatriate knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal 55: 927–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Jeanine, Xuan Bai, and Julie Juan Li. 2015. The influence of leadership on product and process innovations in China: The contingent role of knowledge acquisition capability. Industrial Marketing Management 50: 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Colin, and Ja-Shen Chen. 2013. Breakthrough innovation: The roles of dynamic innovation capabilities and open innovation activities. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 28: 444–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Colin C. J., Chenlung Yang, and Chwen Sheu. 2016. Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation: An empirical study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 41: 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chesbrough, Henry. 2003. Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. [Google Scholar]
- Clausen, Tommy Høyvarde. 2013. The role of operational and dynamic capabilities in ambidextrous innovation: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at 35th DRUID Celebration Conference 2013, Barcelona, Spain, June 17–19. [Google Scholar]
- Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Comin, Rafaele, Danile Sanches, and Francisco Uchoa. 2015. O processo de gestão da inovação: um estudo de caso nas empresas baianas do Polo de Informática de Ilhéus. Paper presented at XVI Congreso da Associação Latino Ibero-Americana de Gestão de Tecnologia (ALTEC), Porto Alegre, Brasil, Octubre 19–22. [Google Scholar]
- Crossan, Mary M., and Marina Apaydin. 2010. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies 47: 1154–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahlander, Linus, and Martin W. Wallin. 2006. A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets. Research Policy 35: 1243–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deeds, David L. 2001. The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology start-ups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 18: 29–47. [Google Scholar]
- Di Rienzo, Julio A., Fernando Casanoves, Mónica Balzarini, Laura González, Margot Tablada, and Walter Robledo. 2016. InfoStat Versión 2016. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. Available online: http://www.infostat.com.ar (accessed on 10 April 2018).
- Dobni, Brooke C. 2008. Measuring innovation culture in organizations. The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management 11: 539–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolsen, Mark, and Ratna Babu Chinnam. 2017. Developing innovation capability in a mass production organization. Journal of Enterprise Transformation. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drucker, Peter. 1954. The Practice of Management. New York: Harper & Row Publisher, Inc. [Google Scholar]
- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Jeffrey A. Martin. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21: 1105–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enkel, Ellen, Oliver Gassman, and Henry Chesbrough. 2009. Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management 39: 311–16. [Google Scholar]
- Evan, William M., and Gay Black. 1967. Innovation in business organizations: some factors associated with success or failure of staff proposals. The Journal of Business 40: 519–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feller, Joseph, Patrick Finnegan, Brian Fitzgerald, and Jeremy Hayes. 2008. From peer production to productization: a study of socially enabled business exchanges in open source service networks. Information Systems Research 19: 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flor, María L., and María J. Oltra. 2004. Identification of innovating firms through technological innovation indicators: An application to the Spanish ceramic tile industry. Research Policy 33: 323–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabriel, Kuno Ruben. 1971. Biplot display of multivariate matrices with application to principal components analysis. Biometrika 58: 453–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gassmann, Oliver, and Ellen Enkel. 2004. Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes. Paper presented at R&D Management Conference (RADMA), Lisbon, Portugal, July 7–9. [Google Scholar]
- Gumusluoglu, Lale, and Arzu Ilsev. 2009. Transformational leadership, creativity and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research 62: 461–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hadjimanolis, Athanasios. 2000. An investigation of innovation antecedents in small firms in the context of a small developing country. R&D Management 30: 235–46. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Jin K., Namwoon Kim, and Rajendra K. Srivastava. 1998. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation the missing link? Journal of Marketing 62: 30–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hart, Stuart L., and Glen Dowell. 2010. A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management 37: 1464–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helfat, Constance, Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margaret A. Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David Teece, and Sidney Winter. 2007. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
- Hilles, Afkar Qasem, Tee Ding Ding, and Pervaiz K. Ahmed. 2009. Managing for innovation and creativity: Organizational paradoxes in implementation practice. International Journal of Management Practice 3: 305–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hotho, Sabine, and Katherine Champion. 2011. Small Businesses in the new Creative Industries: Innovation as a People Management Challenge. Management Decision 49: 29–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iddris, Faisal. 2016. Innovation Capability: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management 11: 235–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indarti, Nurul. 2017. Impacts of external knowledge and interaction on innovation capability among Indonesian SMEs. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research 13: 430–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaskyte, Kristina, and María Susana de Riobó. 2004. Characteristics of innovative nonprofit organizations in Argentina. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 15: 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, Dong I. 2001. Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal 13: 185–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, Dong I., Chee Chow, and Anne Wu. 2003. The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly 14: 525–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kandampully, Jay. 2002. Innovation as the core competency of a service organization: The role of technology, knowledge and networks. European Journal of Innovation Management 5: 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1982. The middle manager as innovator. Harvard Business Review 60: 95–105. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Kanter, Rosabeth M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organization. In Research in Organizational Behavior. Edited by Barry M. Staw and L.L. Cummings. Greenwich: JAI Press, vol. 10, pp. 139–62. [Google Scholar]
- Katz, Ralph. 1982. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 81–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keller, Robert T. 1986. Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal 29: 715–26. [Google Scholar]
- Keller, Robert T., and Winford E. Holland. 1983. Communicators and innovators in research and development organizations. Academy of Management Journal 26: 742–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keupp, Marcus Matthias, Maximilian Palmie, and Oliver Gassmann. 2011. The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews 14: 367–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Dong-Young, Vinod Kumar, and Uma Kumar. 2012. Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. Journal of Operations Management 30: 295–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koc, Tufan. 2007. Organizational determinants of innovation capacity in software companies. Computers & Industrial Engineering 53: 373–85. [Google Scholar]
- Koellinger, Philipp. 2008. Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others? Small Business Economics 31: 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kogut, Bruce, and Udo Zander. 1992. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science 3: 383–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohlbacher, Markus. 2013. The impact of dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement on innovation: The role of business process orientation. Knowledge and Process Management 20: 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lages, Luis Felipe, Silva Graca, and Chris C. Styles. 2009. Relationship capabilities, quality and innovation as determinants of export performance. Journal of International Marketing 17: 47–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawson, Benn, and Danny Samson. 2001. Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management 5: 377–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Masson, Pascal, Benoit Weil, and Armand A. Hatchuel. 2010. Strategic Management of Innovation and Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Leavy, Brian. 2005. A leader’s guide to creating an innovation culture. Strategy & Leadership 33: 38–45. [Google Scholar]
- Lemon, Mark, and Parminder Singh Sahota. 2004. Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation 24: 483–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Jianwen, Harold Welsch, and Michael Stoica. 2003. Organizational absorptive capacity and responsiveness: an empirical investigation of growth-oriented SMEs. Entrepreneur. Theory Pract 28: 63–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Shu-Hsien, Chi-Chuan Wu, Da-Chian Hu, and Kuang-An Tsui. 2010. Relationships between knowledge acquisition, absorptive capacity and innovation capability: An empirical study on Taiwan’s financial and manufacturing industries. Journal of Information Science 36: 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Hai-Fen, Jing-Qin Su, and Angela Higgins. 2016. How dynamic capabilities affect adoption of management innovations. Journal of Business Research 69: 862–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, Andrés. 1998. La reciente literatura sobre la economía del cambio tecnológico y la innovación: una guía temática. I&D. Revista de Industria y Desarrollo 1: 105–56. [Google Scholar]
- López, Andrés, and Gustavo Lugones. 1997. El proceso de innovación tecnológica en América Latina en los años noventa. Criterios para la definición de indicadores. Redes. Revista de Estudios Sociales de La Ciencia IV: 13–48. [Google Scholar]
- Manso, Gustavo. 2011. Motivating Innovation. The Journal of Finance 66: 1823–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martins, Ellen C., and Fransie Terblanche. 2003. Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 6: 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medina, Carmen C., Antonio C. Lavado, and Ramón V. Cabrera. 2005. Characteristics of innovative companies: A case study of companies in different sectors. Creativity and Innovation Management 14: 272–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda, Eduardo, and Paulo N. Figueiredo. 2010. Dinâmica da acumulação de capacidades inovadoras: Evidências de empresas de software no Rio de Janeiro e em São Paulo. Revista de Administração de Empresas 50: 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monge, Peter R., Michael D. Cozzens, and Noshir S. Contractor. 1993. Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science 3: 250–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, Lorraine, and Patrick Finnegan. 2014. Beyond free software: An exploration of the business value of strategic open source. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, Lorraine, Joseph Feller, and Patrick Finnegan. 2013. Exploring value networks: theorising the creation and capture of value with open source software. European Journal of Information Systems 22: 569–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafa, Mohamed. 2005. Factors affecting organizational creativity and innovativeness in Egyptian business organizations: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Development 24: 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mudrak, Tomas, Andreas van Wagenberg, and Emiel Wubben. 2005. Innovation process and innovativeness of facility management organizations. Facilities 23: 103–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mumford, Michael D., Ginamarie M. Scott, Blaine Gaddis, and Jill M. Strange. 2002. Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly 6: 705–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthusamy, Senthil Kumar, Jane V. Wheeler, and Bret L. Simmon. 2005. Self-managing work teams: Enhancing organizational innovativeness. Organization Development Journal 23: 53–67. [Google Scholar]
- Nystrom, Paul C., Keshavamurthy Ramamurthy, and Alla L. Wilson. 2002. Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: Adoption of imaging technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 19: 221–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Conner, Gina Colarelli. 2008. Major innovation as dynamic capability: A system approach. Product Innovation Management 25: 313–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OECD. 2002. Manual de Frascati 2002. París: Organización para la Cooperación y Desarrollo Económicos. [Google Scholar]
- OECD and Eurostat. 2005. Manual de Oslo. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre Innovación. Paris: OCDE-EUROSTAT. [Google Scholar]
- Pavitt, Keith. 2002. Innovating routines in the business firm: What corporate tasks should they be. Industrial and Corporate Change 11: 117–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelz, Donald C., and Frank M. Andrews. 1966. Scientists in Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
- Perdomo-Ortiz, Jesus, Gonzalez-Benito Javier, and Jesus Galende. 2006. Total quality management as a forerunner of business innovation capability. Technovation 26: 1170–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ralpha, Paavo, and Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen. 2013. Incremental and radical innovation in coopetition—the role of absorptive capacity and appropriability. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30: 154–69. [Google Scholar]
- ReVelle, Jack B. 2010. Manufacturing of Best Practices: An Innovation, Productivity and Quality Focus. Boca Raton: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
- RICYT/OEA/CYTED/COLCIENCIAS/OCYT. 2001. Normalización de Indicadores de Innovación Tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe. Manual de Bogotá. Bogotá: RICYT/OEA/CYTED/COLCIENCIAS/OCYT. [Google Scholar]
- Ridder, A. 2011. Sensing and seizing open innovation: A capability-based approach. Paper presented at the DIME-DRUID ACADEMY Winter Conference 2011, Aalborg, Denmark, January 20–22. [Google Scholar]
- Ritter, Thomas, and Hans Georg Gemunden. 2003. Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research 56: 745–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohrbeck, René, and Hans Georg Gemunden. 2011. Corporate Foresight: Its three roles in enhancing the innovation capacity of the firm. Technology Forecasting and Social Change 78: 231–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, Isidoro, and Juan A. Martínez-Román. 2012. Self-employment and innovation. Exploring the determinants of innovative behavior in small businesses. Research Policy 41: 178–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romero, María del Carmen, Alfredo Rébori, and María Isabel Camio. 2010. Un índice para medir el nivel de innovación tecnológica en empresas intensivas en el uso de tecnología. RAI: Revista de Administração e Inovação 7: 5–20. [Google Scholar]
- Romijn, Henny, and Manuel Albaladejo. 2002. Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy 31: 1053–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rueda-Cáceres, Iván Mauricio, and Jenny Marcela Sánchez-Torres. 2015. Características para la medición de los facilitadores de gestión como componentes de la capacidad de innovación. Paper presented at XVI Congreso da Associação Latino Ibero-Americana de Gestão de Tecnologia (ALTEC), Porto Alegre, Brasil, Octubre 19–22. [Google Scholar]
- Sajeva, Svetlana, and Robertas Jucevicius. 2008. Linking Knowledge Management and Organizational Innovativeness. Social Sciences 1: 50–58. [Google Scholar]
- Samson, Danny, Marianne Gloet, and Prakash Singh. 2017. Systematic innovation capability: Evidence from case studies and a large survey. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saunila, Minna. 2017. Innovation capability in achieving higher performance: Perspectives of management and employees. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 29: 903–16. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, Marisa, Marco Busi, Peter Ball, and Robert van der Meer. 2008. Factors Influencing an Organisations ability to Manage Innovation: A Structured Literature Review and Conceptual Model. International Journal of Innovation Management 12: 655–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorescu, Alina B., and Jelena Spanjol. 2008. Innovation’s effect on firm value and risk: Insights from consumer packaged goods. Journal of Marketing 72: 114–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorescu, Alina B., Rajesh K. Chandy, and Jaideep C. Prabhu. 2003. Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. Journal of Marketing 67: 82–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulistyo, Heru. 2016. Innovation capability of SMEs through entrepreneurship, marketing capability, relational capital and empowerment. Asia Pacific Management Review 21: 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamm, Dorel. 2010. Alignment between factors of the innovation process and public sector innovation support measures: An analysis of Estonian dairy processors and biotechnology enterprises. Baltic Journal of Economics 10: 93–94. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, H. K. 1999. An inventory of organizational innovativeness. Technovation 19: 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, David. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28: 1319–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, David. 2010. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning 43: 172–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, David, and Gary Pisano. 1994. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change 3: 537–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teece, David, Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. 1997. Dinamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 18: 509–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teigland, Robin, Paul M. Di Gangi, Björn-Tore Flåten, Elia Giovacchini, and Nicolás Pastorino. 2014. Balancing on a tightrope: Managing the boundaries of a firm-sponsored OSS community and its impact on innovation and absorptive capacity. Information and Organization 24: 25–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tellis, Gerard J., Jaideep C. Prabhu, and Rajesh K. Chandy. 2009. Radical Innovation across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture. Journal of Marketing 73: 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thamhain, Hans J. 1990. Managing technologically innovative team efforts toward new product success. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 7: 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tidd, Joe, John Bessant, and Keith Pavitt. 1997. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change. Great Britain: John Wiley & Sons Inc. [Google Scholar]
- Tjosvold, Dean, and Leonard T. Mcneely. 1988. Innovation through communication in an educational bureaucracy. Communication Research 15: 568–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Un, Annique C. 2002. Innovative capability development in US and Japanese firms. Academy of Management Proceedings IM: E1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, Marcus. 2011. Acquisition as a means for external technology sourcing: Complementary, substitutive or both? Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 28: 283–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- West, Joel. 2007. Value capture and value networks in open source vendor strategies. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07), Big Island, Hawaii, January 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, Robert. 2009. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Hongxin, Xuesong Tong, Poh K. Wong, and Jishan Zhu. 2005. Types of technology sourcing and innovative capability: An exploratory study of Singapore manufacturing firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research 16: 209–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zwetsloot, Gerard. 2001. The management of innovation by frontrunner companies in environmental management and health and safety. Environmental Management and Health 12: 207–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
1 | Cohen and Levinthal (1990), in their seminal work, propose the concept of absorption capability, defined as the ability to exploit external knowledge, a critical component of innovative capabilities. |
2 | In the cited work, the proposal of an index of level of innovation (INI) was studied, which was applied in the context of an exploratory study of multiple cases (Yin 2009) to Argentinian SMEs companies from different sectors. From the data collected on that occasion, those referred to the subgroup of software companies were analyzed in depth in order to identify recurrent problems in obtaining them. |
3 | Only the first two eigenvalues are exposed since the others are equal to 0. |
4 | Only the first two eigenvalues are exposed since the others are equal to 0. |
Dimensions | Variables |
---|---|
CAPABILITIES |
|
RESULTS |
|
IMPACTS |
|
Variable | Subvariables | |
---|---|---|
Name | ID. Variable | |
Structure | V1_ Struct |
|
Software tools | V2_Tools |
|
Strategy | V3_Strat |
|
Communication | V4_Communic |
|
Leadership | V5_Leader |
|
Motivation | V6_Motiv |
|
Free software | V7_FreeSoft |
|
Innovation activities | V8_InnAct |
|
Internal determinants | V9_IntDet |
|
External determinants | V10_ExtDet |
|
(a) | ||||||||||
V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | V7 | V8 | V9 | V10 | |
V1_Struct | 1.00 | |||||||||
V2_Tools | 0.98 | 1.00 | ||||||||
V3_Strat | 0.64 | 0.45 | 1.00 | |||||||
V4_Communic | −0.02 | −0.24 | 0.76 | 1.00 | ||||||
V5_Leader | 0.81 | 0.66 | 0.97 | 0.57 | 1.00 | |||||
V6_Motiv | 0.60 | 0.42 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.96 | 1.00 | ||||
V7_FreeSoft | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.57 | −0.10 | 0.76 | 0.54 | 1.00 | |||
V8_InnAct | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.18 | −0.50 | 0.43 | 0.14 | 0.91 | 1.00 | ||
V9_IntDet | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.36 | 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.62 | 1.00 | |
V10_ExtDet | −0.47 | −0.65 | 0.38 | 0.89 | 0.13 | 0.42 | −0.54 | −0.84 | −0.10 | 1.00 |
(b) | ||||||||||
V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | V7 | V8 | V9 | V10 | |
V1_Struct | 1.00 | |||||||||
V2_Tools | 0.90 | 1.00 | ||||||||
V3_Strat | 1.00 | 0.88 | 1.00 | |||||||
V4_Communic | 0.52 | 0.09 | 0.56 | 1.00 | ||||||
V5_Leader | 0.98 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 0.68 | 1.00 | |||||
V6_Motiv | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.48 | −0.45 | 0.35 | 1.00 | ||||
V7_FreeSoft | 0.97 | 0.76 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.00 | 0.29 | 1.00 | |||
V8_InnAct | 0.99 | 0.84 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.99 | 1.00 | ||
V9_IntDet | 0.76 | 0.41 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.88 | −0.15 | 0.90 | 0.83 | 1.00 | |
V10_ExtDet | −0.75 | −0.39 | −0.78 | −0.95 | −0.87 | 0.17 | −0.90 | −0.82 | −1.00 | 1.00 |
(a) | |||
Lambda | Value | Proportion | Cum Prop |
1 | 6.38 | 0.64 | 0.64 |
2 | 3.62 | 0.36 | 1.00 |
(b) | |||
Lambda | Value | Proportion | Cum Prop |
1 | 7.67 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
2 | 2.33 | 0.23 | 1.00 |
(a) | ||
Variables | e1 | e2 |
V1_Struct | 0.38 | −0.13 |
V2_Tools | 0.35 | −0.23 |
V3_Strat | 0.32 | 0.31 |
V4_Communic | 0.09 | 0.51 |
V5_Leader | 0.37 | 0.20 |
V6_Motiv | 0.31 | 0.33 |
V7_FreeSoft | 0.38 | −0.17 |
V8_InnAct | 0.29 | −0.36 |
V9_IntDet | 0.39 | 0.08 |
V10_ExtDet | −0.10 | 0.51 |
(b) | ||
Variables | e1 | e2 |
V1_Struct | 0.35 | 0.15 |
V2_Tools | 0.28 | 0.41 |
V3_Strat | 0.36 | 0.12 |
V4_Communic | 0.25 | −0.47 |
V5_Leader | 0.36 | 0.02 |
V6_Motiv | 0.11 | 0.62 |
V7_FreeSoft | 0.36 | −0.02 |
V8_InnAct | 0.36 | 0.08 |
V9_IntDet | 0.32 | −0.30 |
V10_ExtDet | −0.32 | 0.31 |
(a) | ||
Variables | PC 1 | PC 2 |
V1_Struct | 0.97 | −0.24 |
V2_Tools | 0.89 | −0.45 |
V3_Strat | 0.80 | 0.59 |
V4_Communic | 0.22 | 0.98 |
V5_Leader | 0.93 | 0.37 |
V6_Motiv | 0.78 | 0.63 |
V7_FreeSoft | 0.95 | −0.32 |
V8_InnAct | 0.73 | −0.68 |
V9_IntDet | 0.99 | 0.15 |
V10_ExtDet | −0.24 | 0.97 |
(b) | ||
Variables | PC 1 | PC 2 |
V1_Struct | 0.97 | 0.23 |
V2_Tools | 0.78 | 0.63 |
V3_Strat | 0.98 | 0.18 |
V4_Communic | 0.70 | −0.71 |
V5_Leader | 1.00 | 0.04 |
V6_Motiv | 0.32 | 0.95 |
V7_FreeSoft | 1.00 | −0.03 |
V8_InnAct | 0.99 | 0.12 |
V9_IntDet | 0.89 | −0.45 |
V10_ExtDet | −0.88 | 0.47 |
(a) | |||||||||||||||
Result Degrees | V1_Struct | V2_Tools | V3_Strat | V4_Communic | V5_Leader | ||||||||||
Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | |
High | 3.16 | 1.75 | 5.00 | 3.64 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.27 | 1.50 | 4.88 | 3.92 | 1.65 | 4.95 | 3.67 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
Medium | 3.13 | 1.60 | 4.85 | 3.70 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.11 | 1.38 | 4.00 | 3.83 | 0.99 | 4.95 | 3.37 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
Low | 2.85 | 1.45 | 4.70 | 3.17 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.10 | 1.50 | 4.50 | 3.89 | 1.32 | 4.95 | 3.23 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
Result Degrees | V6_Motiv | V7_FreeSoft | V8_InnAct | V9_IntDet | V10_ExtDet | ||||||||||
Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | |
High | 3.02 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.18 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 2.92 | 1.00 | 4.60 | 3.78 | 2.00 | 4.60 | 3.15 | 1.65 | 4.35 |
Medium | 2.73 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.17 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 3.09 | 1.40 | 4.60 | 3.65 | 2.80 | 4.40 | 2.96 | 1.65 | 4.00 |
Low | 2.73 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.86 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 2.65 | 1.00 | 4.20 | 3.50 | 1.80 | 4.40 | 3.16 | 2.00 | 4.35 |
(b) | |||||||||||||||
Impact Degrees | V1_Struct | V2_Tools | V3_Strat | V4_Communic | V5_Leader | ||||||||||
Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | |
High | 3.25 | 1.60 | 4.85 | 3.76 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.60 | 2.38 | 4.63 | 4.25 | 2.64 | 4.95 | 3.60 | 2.00 | 5.00 |
Medium | 3.14 | 1.75 | 5.00 | 3.76 | 2.40 | 4.40 | 3.29 | 2.00 | 4.88 | 3.71 | 0.99 | 4.95 | 3.50 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
Low | 2.99 | 1.45 | 4.85 | 3.30 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2.95 | 1.38 | 4.50 | 3.93 | 1.32 | 4.95 | 3.43 | 1.00 | 5.00 |
Impact Degrees | V6_Motiv | V7_FreeSoft | V8_InnAct | V9_IntDet | V10_ExtDet | ||||||||||
Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | Mean | Min | Max | |
High | 2.87 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.27 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 3.37 | 1.40 | 4.40 | 3.92 | 3.40 | 4.60 | 3.05 | 1.65 | 4.35 |
Medium | 3.14 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.12 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4.60 | 3.62 | 2.00 | 4.40 | 3.11 | 1.65 | 4.35 |
Low | 2.63 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.04 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 2.68 | 1.00 | 4.60 | 3.66 | 1.80 | 4.40 | 3.10 | 2.00 | 4.00 |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Camio, M.I.; Romero, M.D.C.; Álvarez, M.B.; Rébori, A.J. Distinctive Innovation Capabilities of Argentine Software Companies with High Innovation Results and Impacts. Adm. Sci. 2018, 8, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020013
Camio MI, Romero MDC, Álvarez MB, Rébori AJ. Distinctive Innovation Capabilities of Argentine Software Companies with High Innovation Results and Impacts. Administrative Sciences. 2018; 8(2):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020013
Chicago/Turabian StyleCamio, María Isabel, María Del Carmen Romero, María Belén Álvarez, and Alfredo José Rébori. 2018. "Distinctive Innovation Capabilities of Argentine Software Companies with High Innovation Results and Impacts" Administrative Sciences 8, no. 2: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020013
APA StyleCamio, M. I., Romero, M. D. C., Álvarez, M. B., & Rébori, A. J. (2018). Distinctive Innovation Capabilities of Argentine Software Companies with High Innovation Results and Impacts. Administrative Sciences, 8(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8020013