Next Article in Journal
A Human Health Toxicity Assessment of Biogas Engines Regulated and Unregulated Emissions
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment and Optimization of a Clean and Healthier Fusion Welding Procedure for Rebar in Building Structures
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 10
Issue 20
10.3390/app10207046
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Formwork Removal Time Reduction on Construction Productivity Improvement by Mix Design of Early Strength Concrete

by
Taegyu Lee
1,†,
Jaehyun Lee
2,†,
Jinsung Kim
3,
Hyeonggil Choi
3,* and
Dong-Eun Lee
3
1
Department of Fire and Disaster Prevention, Semyung University, 65 Semyung-ro, Jecheon-si, Chungbuk 27136, Korea
2
Department of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 232 Gongneung-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01811, Korea
3
School of Architecture, Civil, Environment, and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehakro, Bukgu, Daegu 41566, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(20), 7046; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207046
Submission received: 4 September 2020 / Revised: 3 October 2020 / Accepted: 6 October 2020 / Published: 11 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Science and Engineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, we examined the effects of cement fineness, SO3 content, an accelerating agent, and chemical admixtures mixed with unit weights of cement on concrete early strength using concrete mixtures. C24 (characteristic value of concrete, 24 MPa) was used in the experiment conducted. Ordinary Portland cement (OPC), high fineness and SO3 OPC (HFS_OPC), and Early Portland cement (EPC) were selected as the study materials. The unit weights of cement were set to OPC 330, 350, and 380. Further, a concrete mixture was prepared with a triethanolamine (TEA)-based chemical admixture to HFS. A raw material analysis was conducted, and the compressive strength, temperature history, and maturity (D∙h) were examined. Then, the vertical formwork removal time was evaluated according to the criterion of each country. Finally, the time required to develop concrete strength of 5 MPa was estimated. Results showed that the early strength of concrete mixed with HFS and EPC was greater than that exhibited by concrete with an increased unit weight of cement with OPC. In addition, when HFS was used with EPC, its strength developed early, similar to the trend exhibited by EPC, even at low temperatures.

1. Introduction

Early strength concrete is used as an elemental technology for reducing construction time by realizing early formwork removal at construction sites [1,2]. Early strength concrete can be investigated via two methods: (1) Appropriate management of the proportions of materials mixed in the concrete, and (2) acceleration of cement hydration by varying the curing temperature [3,4]. It is possible to decrease the setting time of concrete and increase the curing speed by reducing the water to cement (W/C) [5]. For mixtures used in the field, a reduction in the W/C ratio increases the design strength by increasing the unit weight of cement. This method can improve the strength of concrete in a certain range when applied to the mixture design of a site. However, the method does not consider economic efficiency and cannot be used to improve concrete mixture design [6].
Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is commonly used in concrete mixtures owing to its chemical stability. However, it exhibits limitations in terms of developing early strength in concrete [7]. Early strength in concrete can be developed using early strength cement, which increases the C3S content and fineness and decreases the C2S content; thus, for early strength development, early strength cement is better than OPC [8]. Despite the excellent early strength development, the early strength cement has not been commonly used because it is difficult to develop a stable long-term strength, hence reducing the economic efficiency.
Bentz et al. [9,10,11,12,13] reported that a higher W/C ratio may have a greater influence on the early strength development and cement with a higher fineness can reduce the formwork removal time under the curing conditions at actual construction sites.
It is possible to develop the early strength of cement for which the fineness of OPC is increased to 380 m2/kg, and the SO3 content is increased to 3.1% in the scope of the 13–20 °C temperature range [14,15]. Rixon et al. [16,17,18] conducted research on the early strength development of OPC by reducing the setting time using triethanolamine (TEA). Further, according to the research results reported by Aggoun et al. [19], rapid curing occurred when the TEA accelerating agent was used in large quantities. A retarder was also used to control the rapid curing. However, the chemical decomposition of the accelerating agent and retarder was also reported in some cases. These studies have low reproducibility for the actual production of concrete, and they also have limitations in determining economical mixtures by fully considering the climate conditions of local areas. In particular, when the temperature of a local area is irregular and the curing temperature is less than 15 °C, accurate strength prediction for determining the formwork removal time [20,21,22,23,24] is difficult.
In this study, we examined the influence of unit weight of cement in concrete that uses OPC on early strength development by considering the conditions of construction sites and referring to the concrete mixture of C24 (characteristic value of concrete, 24 MPa). In addition, high fineness and SO3 OPC (HFS_OPC) and early Portland cement (EPC) were selected, for which the fineness and SO3 content were varied considering the economic efficiency of mixture design. Further, the effect of the addition of a polycarboxylic (PC) superplasticizer mixed with an accelerating agent on the acceleration of early strength was analyzed. This study aims to examine the influencing factors of cement for early strength development by curing temperature and to develop the optimal mixture with economic efficiency. In addition, the formwork removal time was predicted, and its influence on the construction productivity was examined.
In conclusion, this study aims to contribute toward enhancing the utilization of construction sites by investigating the effects of various concrete material factors, amount of cement, type of cement, chemical admixture, and SO3 on the early strength.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Table 1 summarizes the chemical composition of the binders by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. OPC (ASTM type I), HFS_OPC, and EPC (ASTM type III) were used as the concrete binders. For OPC, the density and fineness were 3150 kg/m3 and 330 m2/kg; for HFS, they were 3130 kg/m3 and 380 m2/kg; and for EPC, they were 3160 kg/m3 and 488 m2/kg, respectively.
Figure 1 shows the results of the sieve analysis curves on the aggregates. Washed sea sand and crushed sand were used as the fine aggregates. Further, the fineness modulus of the fine aggregates was 2.84.
For washed sea sand, the fineness, density, and absorption were 2.01, 2600 kg/m3, and 0.79%, respectively. For crushed sand, the fineness, absorption, and density were 3.29, 0.87%, and 2570 kg/m3, respectively. Crushed coarse aggregate with a size of 25 mm, absorption of 0.76%, and density of 2600 kg/m3 was used as the coarse aggregate. For the chemical admixture, a PC superplasticizer and a TEA-based PC superplasticizer were used.

2.2. Experimental Plan and Mix Proportions

Table 2 shows the experimental plan. For the concrete strength, the concrete of C24 was referenced, which is most commonly used at construction sites. For C24 (330 P) that used OPC, the W/C was set to 0.50 and the unit weight of cement was set to 330 kg/m2. In general, the unit weight of cement is increased to secure the early strength of concrete at construction sites. In this study, C27 (characteristic value of concrete = 27 MPa) and C30 (characteristic value of concrete = 30 MPa) were selected, which increased the unit weight of cement. The unit weight of cement of C27 (350P) and C30 (380P) was 350 and 380 kg/m2, respectively.
In addition, HFS_OPC and EPC, which increased the fineness and SO3 content of cement, were additionally selected and examined to improve concrete strength considering the economic efficiency of concrete mixtures. For such concrete mixtures, the unit weight of cement was set as 330 kg/m2, similar to that of C24. HFS (330P) increased the fineness and SO3 content of OPC, and it is effective in developing the early strength [14,15]. However, as it has limitations in developing the early strength of concrete, ePC (early polycarboxylic superplasticizer with TEA) was added to HFS [23].
To identify the effect of the curing temperature on concrete strength, chamber (13 °C) and water curing (20 °C) were examined.
The slump (mm) and air content (%) of concrete were evaluated to ensure that they could be used onsite. As for hardened properties, a cylindrical mold (Ø100 mm × 200 mm) was fabricated, and its concrete strength was measured at 18 h, 24 h, and 72 h. In addition, the temperature history (°C) was measured, and the maturity (D∙h) was calculated based on the temperature history. The time required to remove the vertical formwork on concrete was estimated at the curing temperature by examining the correlation between the concrete strength and maturity.
The formwork removal time on concrete is specified in each country’s regulations. However, its decision criteria differ. This study referred to the Asian (including South Korea and Japan) criteria that present a detailed demolding strength value [24,25]. The strength criterion for the formwork removal of concrete was set as 5 MPa.
Table 3 shows the mixing proportions on concrete. For the mixing proportions on concrete, their corresponding practical values were used as reference, and the unit weight of water was 165 kg/m2.
For the fine aggregates, crushed sand and washed sea sand were mixed at a volume ratio of 6:4. For the fresh properties on concrete, the slump was set to 180 ± 25 mm and air content was 4.5 ± 1.5%, respectively, to apply workability in the construction site.
The concretes were mixed using a commercial machine (mixing speed: 5–50 rpm, mixing capacity: 180 L double-axial spiral mixing type, Woojin, Korea). The fine aggregate was added and mixed for 30 s. Then, the binder, water, and coarse aggregate were added and mixed for 30 s. To ensure sufficient workability, a superplasticizer was added and mixed for 30 s. The concrete mix was prepared in 150 s.

2.3. Test Methods

2.3.1. Properties of Raw Materials and Concrete

Table 4 shows the test methods for properties of the raw materials and concrete. This study attempted to examine the effects of the unit weight of cement and factors related to the cement types on concrete strength development of concrete. The raw material analysis of cement was conducted to investigate the physicochemical properties of cement. Experiments were performed in accordance with ASTM C204 [26] for the particle size distribution of cement, ASTM C114 [27] for XRF, and ASTM C1702 [28] for the heat of hydration.
The slump of fresh concrete was evaluated according to ASTM C143/C143M [29], and the air content test method was evaluated according to ASTM C231/C231M-17a [30]. To secure the workability of concrete that arrived at the site, the fresh properties of concrete were evaluated after 60 min. Specimens for compressive strength test were fabricated with dimensions of Ø100 mm × 200 mm. The specimens were cured at 13 °C and 20 °C using a constant temperature and humidity chamber.
The compressive strength of the concrete was calculated after measuring the maximum load using a 300-ton class universal test machine in accordance with ASTM C873 [31] and ASTM C39/C39M [32] at the ages of 18 h, 24 h, and 72 h.

2.3.2. Temperature History and Maturity on Concrete

To obtain the temperature history of concrete, the hydration history was measured by embedding K-type thermocouples at the center of concrete specimen. The maturity was calculated as follows in accordance with ASTM C1074 [33]:
M ( t ) = ∑ ( T a −   T 0 ) Δ t ,
where M(t) = the temperature-time factor at age t (degree-days or degree-h), ∆t = time interval (days or h), Ta = average concrete temperature during time interval (∆t, °C), and T0 = datum temperature (°C).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fresh and Hardened Properties on Concrete

Table 5 shows the fresh properties on concrete. When all the concrete mixtures were evaluated, the slump could meet the target range of 180 ± 25 mm both at the beginning and after 60 min. The air content of concrete met range of 4.5 ± 1.5% for all the mixtures, and its reduction was not significant even after 60 min.
Figure 2 shows the concrete strength at early age. As for the concrete strength that used OPC according to the unit weight of cement, no difference between the strength developments of 330P and 350P was reported. For 380P, the strength continuously increased even at 13 °C. At 20 °C, the concrete strength rate was found to be similar for all the specimens until 24 h. However, 380P showed a higher strength development after 72 h. In addition, for the concrete mixtures that used OPC, a compressive strength of 5 MPa was developed after 24 h and 72 h in the case of 20 °C and 13 °C, especially.
For 330HFS, the concrete strength was slightly higher compared to OPC until 24 h. However, it significantly increased and exceeded 10 MPa at 72 h under the curing condition at 13 °C. For 330HFS_EPC, the compressive strength was 2.7 MPa at 18 h and close to 5 MPa at 24 h. It increased with a slope similar to that of 330HFS at 72 h, thereby exhibiting very high strength development compared to 330P. 330EP exhibited a difference in strength development of less than 1 MPa compared to 330HFS_ePC, but showed a significantly higher compressive strength increase rate at 72 h.
At the 20 °C curing temperature, concrete exhibited a higher strength development rate than that at 13 °C. For 330EP and 330HFS_ePC, the compressive strength reached 5 MPa within 18 h, and this value was reached within 24 h for 330HFS and in the 24–72 h range for 330P. 330P_ePC reached 5 MPa within 24 h at 13 °C, and the effect was significantly increased at a higher curing temperature.

3.2. Temperature History and Maturity on Concrete

Figure 3 shows the maturity of concrete according to the elapsed time. When a chamber with a constant temperature and humidity is used, the temperature changes within the ±2 °C range at the set temperatures of 13 °C and 20 °C. In this study, the maturity was calculated as the average chamber curing temperature because the error range of ±2 °C was met, although there were some differences depending on the concrete mixture. The maturity of concrete linearly increased, which exhibited higher values at a 20 °C compared to 13 °C, and this difference significantly increased over time.
Figure 4 shows the relation between the maturity and concrete strength at early ages. For the specimens that used OPC in which the unit weight of cement was increased, the compressive strength development tended to increase according to the maturity, but its effect was not significant. The maturity to develop 5 MPa was 1375 D∙h(330P), 1108 D∙h(350P), and 827 D∙h(380P). For 380P in which the unit weight of cement was increased, the maturity value to develop 5 MPa was approximately 60% that of 330P.
The compressive strength of each cement type significantly increased with the maturity. The maturity to develop 5 MPa was 708 D∙h for 330HFS and 408 D∙h for 330EP. It was 475 D∙h for 330HFS_ePC, which was almost similar to the value of 330EP. For 330HFS, the maturity to develop 5 MPa was also approximately 50% that of 330P, which was lower than the value of 380P. This indicates that using HFS or EPC is more efficient than increasing the unit weight of cement to secure the concrete strength.

3.3. Effect of Cement Fineness on Concrete Early Strength

Figure 5 shows the particle size distribution of OPC, HFS, and EPC. The volume was found to be in the following order when the particle size distribution of each cement type was analyzed: OPC (mean size: 16.49 µm; fineness: 330 m2/kg) < HFS (mean size: 16.31 µm; fineness: 380 m2/kg) < EPC (mean size: 14.01 µm; fineness: 488 m2/kg).
Figure 6 shows the relation of fineness of cement and concrete strength. The relative strength of concrete was calculated as follows:
R e l a t i v e   s t r e n g t h = f c u f 330 p ,
where fcu = compressive strength with mixture and f330p = compressive strength of 330p.
The relation between the fineness of cement and concrete strength showed that the compressive strength tended to increase with the fineness of cement. The optimal fineness, however, was found to be between 4300 m2/kg and 4500 m2/kg. In addition, the high fineness of cement had a higher effect on the concrete strength at low temperatures.
In particular, when 330HFS was used, the strength was approximately twice that of 330P at 13 °C, and this effect was higher at early ages, i.e., less than 24 h. Although 330HFS was found to be favorable for applying the concrete strength of 5 MPa, its strength development was found to be slightly lower than that of 330EP after 24 h. At temperatures higher than 20 °C, the relative strength increased with the fineness of cement in a manner similar to that of the 13 °C curing.
This difference in fineness is significantly related to the hydration reaction of cement. Figure 7 shows the variation in heat of microhydration with elapsed time for each cement type. HFS and EPC had higher microhydration heat values than OPC at early ages less than 24 h. Figure 8 shows the cumulative heat of microhydration for each cement type. The plot of the cumulative microhydration heat of cement also shows that HFS and EPC exhibited values more than twice higher than those of OPC from the point of contact with water. Based on this, the total amount of heat of each mixture can be calculated according to the unit weight of cement.
There was no significant difference in the total amount of heat according to the unit weight of cement within 24 h, which was also related to the maturity and compressive strength results (see Figure 4a). In addition, after 24 h, the amount of heat significantly increased as the unit weight of cement increased, indicating that the unit weight of cement affects the concrete strength. Figure 9 shows the variation in the cumulative microhydration heat according to the cement type.
In addition, the results of analyzing the amount of heat according to the cement type showed that HFS and EPC exhibited similar values until 24 h, but the amount of heat from EPC tended to decrease after 24 h. In general, for concrete that uses EPC, fast early strength development is secured but the long-term strength tends to decrease [9,10].

3.4. Effect of Cement SO3 Contents on Concrete Early Strength

Figure 10 shows the XRF analysis results of OPC, HFS, and EPC cements. The SO3 contents of HFS and EPC were observed to be higher than 3%. They were approximately 107–129% higher than value of OPC. The SO3/Al2O3 value that represents the early strength performance of concrete was 116.1% higher for HFS and 132.2% higher for EPC than that of OPC.
Figure 11 shows the relation between the SO3 contents of cement and compressive strength development, which was found to be linear. ASTM C150 [8] limits the SO3 content of Portland cement to 3.5% and suggests an optimal SO3 content of 3.1%. In addition, EN 197-1 [34] limits the SO3 content to 4.0%. The relative strength obtained in this study, unlike that of 330P, linearly increased with the SO3 content in the range smaller than EN 197-1. In addition, the effect on the relative strength was higher at the lower temperature of 13 °C. The relative strength of 380P appears to have increased because the overall SO3 content increased owing to the increase in the unit weight of cement.
In the case of EPC with high fineness, the compressive strength increased after 24 h despite the reduction in the microhydration heat because the high SO3 content contributed to the strength improvement [2,8]. The relative strength of HFS tended to be higher than value of OPC with the higher cement fineness and SO3 content. When EPC was used, the effect was increased by approximately 1.5–2 times.
Mohammed and Safiullah [35] and Lee and Lee [14,15] reported that the compressive strength significantly increased after 48 h when the SO3 content was between 3.0% and 3.2%. They also mentioned that increasing the fineness of cement (for which the SO3 content was increased to 3.1% here) had a large impact on the early strength. In this study, when EPC was additionally used in the SO3 content range of less than 4%, a strength development similar to the level of concrete using EPC was achievable.

3.5. Comparison of Escape Time for Vetical Form Removal

Figure 12 shows the variation in concrete strength according to the average temperature after 12 h. Based on the relationship between the maturity and concrete strength, concrete strength development after 12 h of curing time was calculated and reviewed by referring to the codes of each country [36]. This was conducted to derive the optimal mixture by establishing an objective criterion for the formwork removal time of concrete.
The results of this study showed that it would be difficult to apply the 10 °C and 12 h demolding conditions suggested by American Concrete Institute (ACI) [20] because compressive strength development was not observed in all the mixtures. Further, the application of British Standards (BS) EN [22] is difficult except for 330EP and 330HFS_ePC.
The Asian (South Korea and Japan) criterion of 5 MPa [23,24] was found to be applicable only to 330EP and 330HFS_ePC at 12 h. As the accurate value for demolding strength was presented, however, it is expected that the formwork removal time can be predicted by examining the compressive strength and applying the maturity. Therefore, in this study, the demolding strength of each mixture was analyzed using the Asian criterion, as aforementioned.
Figure 13 shows the variation in the elapsed time at the strength of 5 MPa for concrete. The 5 MPa development time was examined according to the 10 °C condition suggested by ACI and the 20 °C condition, which is the curing criterion managed in the field. An order of 330P (68 h) > 350P (55 h) < 380P (41 h) < 330HFS (35 h) < 330HFS_ePC (24 h) < 330EP (20 h) was found at 10 °C. At 20 °C, the following order was found: 330P (46 h) > 350P (37 h) < 380P (28 h) < 330HFS (24 h) < 330HFS_ePC (16 h) < 330EP (14 h). The formwork removal time was shortened as the temperature increased, and 330HFS_ePC and 330EP exhibited almost similar formwork removal times.
Further, future studies should be conducted on securing the demolding time of the formwork using environmentally friendly materials [37,38] and the corrosion resistance according to the SO3 content [39].

4. Conclusions

This study evaluated the effects of the unit weight of cement on concrete that uses OPC on early strength development. HFS_OPC and EPC were selected, and the effects of cement fineness, SO3 content, and chemical admixture were analyzed. The results are summarized as follows.
(1)
The slump and air content necessary for securing the workability on concrete met the set target ranges both at the beginning and after 60 min. The strength development of concrete was further accelerated by the cement type and the addition of EPC than when the unit weight of cement was increased. In addition, the strength development rate of concrete was higher at lower temperatures.
(2)
For the maturity of concrete, the strength development tended to increase according to the maturity. This is because the unit weight of cement increased for the concrete mixtures that used OPC. The effect, however, was not significant when the HFS_OPC and EPC were used.
(3)
When the amount of heat of each mixture was calculated based on the microhydration heat results of cement, no significant differences were found in the total amount of heat within 24 h depending on the unit weight of cement. In addition, analyzing the results of the amount of heat for each cement type showed that HFS and EPC exhibited significantly high values compared to OPC until 24 h, indicating that they are favorable for the development of early strength.
(4)
The relation between concrete strength and the cement fineness showed that the compressive strength tended to increase with the fineness of cement, and an optimal fineness between 4300 m2/kg and 4500 m2/kg was obtained. The microhydration heat was found to be higher when the fineness of cement was high than when the unit weight of cement was increased. The results of analyzing the amount of heat for each cement type showed that HFS and EPC exhibited significantly higher values compared with OPC up to 24 h. Thus, they are expected to be favorable for early strength development.
(5)
A linear relationship was observed between the SO3 content and relative strength of cement when SO3 content was less than 4%. In addition, when the unit weight of cement was increased, the early strength was slightly increased owing to the increase in overall SO3 content.
(6)
The criterion of each country for the formwork removal time on concrete were examined and applying the Asian criterion was judged to be effective, which presents a clear compressive strength of 5 MPa. The use of EPC and HFS_ePC can shorten the formwork removal time by 20–24 h at 10 °C and by 14–16 h at 20 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L., J.L., and H.C.; methodology, T.L., J.L., and H.C.; investigation, T.L., J.L., J.K., H.C. and D.-E.L.; resources, T.L. and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, T.L. and J.L.; writing—review and editing, T.L., J.L., J.K., H.C and D.-E.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT), grant number NRF-2018R1A5A1025137.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barnes, P.; Bensted, J. Structure and Performance of Cements, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mehta, P.; Monteiro, P. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Scrivener, K.L.; Nonat, A. Hydration of cementitious materials, present and future. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 651–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Juilland, K.; Monteiro, P. Advances in understanding hydration of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 78, 38–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abrams, D. Design of Concrete Mixtures, Structural Materials Research Laboratory; Bulletin No. 1, PCA LS001; Lewis Institute: Chicago, IL, USA, 1919. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheung, J.; Jeknavorian, A.; Roberts, L.; Silva, D. Impact of admixtures on the hydration kinetics of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1289–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bentz, D.P.; Peltz, M.; Winpigler, J. Early-age properties of cement-based materials: II. Influence of water-to-cement ratio. ASCE J. Mat. Civ. Eng. 2009, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. ASTM C150. Standard specification for Portland cement. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bentz, D.P. Blending different fineness cements to engineer the properties of cement-based materials. Mag. Concr. Res. 2010, 62, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bentz, D.P.; Haecker, C.J. An argument for using coarse cements in high-performance concretes. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 615–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bentz, D.P.; Garboczi, E.J.; Haecker, C.J.; Jensen, O.M. Effects of cement particle size distribution on performance properties of Portland cement-based materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 1663–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Frigione, G.; Marra, S. Relationship between particle size distribution and compressive strength in Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 1976, 6, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Osbaeck, B.; Johansen, V. Particle size distribution and rate of strength development of Portland cement. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1989, 72, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, J.; Lee, T. Influences of chemical composition and fineness on the development of concrete strength by curing conditions. Materials 2019, 12, 4061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lee, J.; Lee, T. Effects of high CaO fly ash and sulfate activator as a finer binder for cementless grouting material. Materials 2019, 12, 3664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Rixon, R.; Mailvaganam, N. Chemical Admixtures for Concrete, 3rd ed.; E & FN Spon: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Heren, Z.; Ölmez, H. The influence of ethanolamines on the hydration and mechanical properties of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 1996, 26, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aiad, I.; Mohammed, A.A.; Abo-El-Enein, S.A. Rheological properties of cement pastes admixed with some alkanolamines. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Aggoun, S.; Cheikh-Zouaoui, M.; Chikh, N.; Duval, R. Effect of some admixtures on the setting time and strength evolution of cement pastes at early ages. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. ACI 347-04. Guide to Formwork for Concrete; ACI 347; ACI Committee: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ceb-Fip Model code 1990, 1993: Design Code; Telford: London, UK, 1993. [CrossRef]
  22. BS EN 13670:2009. Execution of Concrete Structures; BSI: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. KASS 5. Korea Architectural Standard Specification Reinforced Concrete Work; Architectural Institute of Korea: Seoul, Korea, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  24. JASS 5. Japanese Architectural Standard Specification Reinforced Concrete Work; Architectural Institute of Japan: Tokyo, Japan, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee, T.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y. Effects of admixtures and accelerators on the development of concrete strength for horizontal form removal upon curing at 10 °C. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 37, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. ASTM C204. Standard test methods for fineness of hydraulic cement by air-permeability apparatus. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  27. ASTM C114-18. Standard test methods for chemical analysis of hydraulic cement. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  28. ASTM C1702. Standard test method for measurement of heat of hydration of hydraulic cementitious materials using isothermal conduction calorimetry. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. ASTM C143/C143M REV A. Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  30. ASTM C231/C231M-17a. Standard test method for air content of freshly mixed concrete by the pressure method. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  31. ASTM C873/C873M. Standard test method for compressive strength of concrete cylinders cast in place in cylindrical molds. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. ASTM C39/C39M. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  33. ASTM C1074. Standard practice for estimating concrete strength by the maturity method. In American Society of Testing and Materials; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  34. BS EN 197-1. Cement Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common; BSI: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mohammed, S.; Safiullah, O. Optimization of the SO3 content of an Algerian Portland cement: Study on the effect of various amounts of gypsum on cement properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 164, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Benaicha, M.; Burtschell, Y.; Alaoui, A. Prediction of compressive strength at early age of concrete—Application of maturity. J. Build. Eng. 2016, 6, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pomares, J.C.; Gonzalez, A.; Saura, P. Simple and Resistant Construction Built with Concrete Voussoirs for Developing Countries. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2018, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bautista, A.; Pomares, J.C.; González, M.N.; Velasco, F. Influence of the microstructure of TMT reinforcing bars on their corrosion behavior in concrete with chlorides. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 229, 116899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Małek, M.; Jackowski, M.; Łasica, W.; Kadela, M. Characteristics of Recycled Polypropylene Fibers as an Addition to Concrete Fabrication Based on Portland Cement. Materials 2020, 13, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Applsci 10 07046 g001 550
Figure 1. Gradation sieve analysis test result for the aggregates: (a) Fine aggregates and (b) coarse aggregates.
Figure 1. Gradation sieve analysis test result for the aggregates: (a) Fine aggregates and (b) coarse aggregates.
Applsci 10 07046 g001
Applsci 10 07046 g002 550
Figure 2. Concrete strength development at early age: (a) Cement amount and (b) cement type and chemical admixture.
Figure 2. Concrete strength development at early age: (a) Cement amount and (b) cement type and chemical admixture.
Applsci 10 07046 g002
Applsci 10 07046 g003 550
Figure 3. Maturity of concrete according to the elapsed time.
Figure 3. Maturity of concrete according to the elapsed time.
Applsci 10 07046 g003
Applsci 10 07046 g004 550
Figure 4. Relation between maturity and concrete strength at early ages: (a) Cement amount and (b) cement type and chemical admixture.
Figure 4. Relation between maturity and concrete strength at early ages: (a) Cement amount and (b) cement type and chemical admixture.
Applsci 10 07046 g004
Applsci 10 07046 g005 550
Figure 5. Particle size distribution of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), high fineness and SO3 ordinary Portland cement (HSPC), and early Portland cement (EPC).
Figure 5. Particle size distribution of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), high fineness and SO3 ordinary Portland cement (HSPC), and early Portland cement (EPC).
Applsci 10 07046 g005
Applsci 10 07046 g006 550
Figure 6. Relation between fineness of cement and compressive strength development.
Figure 6. Relation between fineness of cement and compressive strength development.
Applsci 10 07046 g006
Applsci 10 07046 g007 550
Figure 7. Heat of microhydration according to elapsed time for each cement type.
Figure 7. Heat of microhydration according to elapsed time for each cement type.
Applsci 10 07046 g007
Applsci 10 07046 g008 550
Figure 8. Cumulative microhydration heat according to the cement type.
Figure 8. Cumulative microhydration heat according to the cement type.
Applsci 10 07046 g008
Applsci 10 07046 g009 550
Figure 9. Variation in cumulative heat of microhydration according to each cement.
Figure 9. Variation in cumulative heat of microhydration according to each cement.
Applsci 10 07046 g009
Applsci 10 07046 g010 550
Figure 10. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis results of OPC, HSPC, and EPC.
Figure 10. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis results of OPC, HSPC, and EPC.
Applsci 10 07046 g010
Applsci 10 07046 g011 550
Figure 11. Relation between SO3 contents of cement and compressive strength development.
Figure 11. Relation between SO3 contents of cement and compressive strength development.
Applsci 10 07046 g011
Applsci 10 07046 g012 550
Figure 12. Variation in the concrete the strength according to the average temperature after 12 h.
Figure 12. Variation in the concrete the strength according to the average temperature after 12 h.
Applsci 10 07046 g012
Applsci 10 07046 g013 550
Figure 13. Variation in the elapsed time at strength of 5 MPa for concrete.
Figure 13. Variation in the elapsed time at strength of 5 MPa for concrete.
Applsci 10 07046 g013
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of the used binders by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the used binders by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis.
MaterialsChemical Composition (%)L.O.I. (4)
CaOAl2O3SiO2MgOFe2O3SO3K2OOthers
OPC (1)60.344.8519.823.833.302.901.080.863.02
HFS (2)61.004.5119.224.143.353.131.040.792.82
EPC (3)61.444.7220.332.953.423.730.950.791.67
(1) OPC: Ordinary Portland cement; (2) HFS: High Fineness and SO3 ordinary Portland cement; (3) EPC: Early Portland cement; (4) L.O.I.: Loss on ignition.
Table
Table 2. Experimental plan.
Table 2. Experimental plan.
SeriesMix
ID.		W/CCement
Type		Unit Weight
of Cement
(kg/m3)		Chemical AdmixtureCuring Temperature
(°C)		Evaluation Item
Ⅰ330P0.50OPC330PCChamber (13 °C)▪ Slump (mm)
350P0.47 350▪ Air contents (%)
380P0.43 380▪ Compressive strength (MPa)
Ⅱ330P0.50OPC330PC (1)Room Temp. (20 °C)- Cylinder Mold (Ø100 × 200)
330HFSHFS330PC- 18, 24, and 72 h
330HFS_ePCHFS330ePC (2)▪ Temperature history (°C)
330EPEPC330PC and Maturity (D∙h)
(1) PC: Polycarboxylic superplasticizer-based type admixture. (2) ePC: early Polycarboxylic superplasticizer with triethanolamine (TEA).
Table
Table 3. Mixing proportions on concrete.
Table 3. Mixing proportions on concrete.
SeriesMix
ID.		W/C (1)S/a (2)
(%)		Unit Weight (kg/m3)PC
(B×%)		ePC
(B×%)
W (3)C (4)HFS (5)EPC (6)S (7)G (8)
Ⅰ330P0.5048.5165330 8858910.8
350P0.4748.5165350 8768830.8
380P0.4348.5165380 8648700.8
Ⅱ330P0.5048.5165330 8858910.8
330HFS0.5048.5165 330 8848900.8
330HFS_ePC0.5048.5165 330 884890 0.8
330EP0.5048.5165 3308858910.8
(1) W/C: Water/Cement; (2) S/a: Sand/aggregates; (3) W: Water; (4) Cement; (5) High fineness and SO3 ordinary Portland cement (6) Early Portland cement; (7) Sea sand + Crushed sand; (8) G: Gravel.
Table
Table 4. Test methods for engineering properties of raw materials and concrete.
Table 4. Test methods for engineering properties of raw materials and concrete.
SeriesTest ItemTest Method
Raw materials
(Cement)		Particle size distribution (%)ASTM C204
X-ray fluorescenceASTM C114
Heat of HydrationASTM C1702
Mechanical properties analysis
(Concrete)		Compressive strength (MPa)ASTM C873
ASTM C39
Maturity (D∙h)ASTM C1074
Table
Table 5. Fresh properties on concrete.
Table 5. Fresh properties on concrete.
Mix ID.Slump (mm)Air Content (%)
InitialAfter 60 min.InitialAfter 60 min.
330P1901755.45.0
350P1951854.84.4
380P1951804.33.9
330HFS2001854.44.0
330HFS_ePC2051905.85.4
330EP1951755.55.0

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, T.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.; Choi, H.; Lee, D.-E. Effect of Formwork Removal Time Reduction on Construction Productivity Improvement by Mix Design of Early Strength Concrete. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7046. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207046

AMA Style

Lee T, Lee J, Kim J, Choi H, Lee D-E. Effect of Formwork Removal Time Reduction on Construction Productivity Improvement by Mix Design of Early Strength Concrete. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(20):7046. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Taegyu, Jaehyun Lee, Jinsung Kim, Hyeonggil Choi, and Dong-Eun Lee. 2020. "Effect of Formwork Removal Time Reduction on Construction Productivity Improvement by Mix Design of Early Strength Concrete" Applied Sciences 10, no. 20: 7046. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207046

APA Style

Lee, T., Lee, J., Kim, J., Choi, H., & Lee, D. -E. (2020). Effect of Formwork Removal Time Reduction on Construction Productivity Improvement by Mix Design of Early Strength Concrete. Applied Sciences, 10(20), 7046. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop