Model of User Data Analysis Complex for the Management of Diverse Web Projects during Crises
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Methods and Techniques of Data Collection
- Discretion (user profiles are separate and linked).
- Similarity (web project profile characteristics are identical).
- Proximity (links between user profiles are in a single space-time cycle).
- Reciprocity (interaction between user profiles is symmetrical, which is one of the prerequisites for the exchange of resources and information).
- Client user (browser or application) accesses the web project platform through the navigation bar;
- When the user accesses the navigation bar, specific parameters for each community node are passed;
- Additional information is written in the headers and cookies of the request.
- Body, which contains basic user information;
- Headers, which contain meta data about the web project and response;
- Cookies, which preferably contain user identification data, a session ID, and additional content that is specific to each page of the system—cookies are stored on the client side;
- Server info, which contains specific data of the web project platform.
- Obtaining information: At this stage the exact information is determined and in what way will it be received. The raw input information is pre-processed.
- Filtering: Redundant information is discarded, and the input data set for the next stage is built.
- Data structuring: Data is built on the basis of structuring and classification/clustering. Nodes that carry useful information are selected.
- Zone 1 is an area where the received information is pre-filtered in order to select key features. Zone 1 is intermediate between the first and second stages, here the information is converted into data.
- During data filtering there is a partial structuring of data and it is necessary to additionally check the input set for correctness. These processes take place in Zone 2.
- In Zone 3, data is formatted and supplemented. For correct structuring of the data it may be necessary to receive additional information, and in this case it is necessary to pass to a stage of reception of the information. These processes run cyclically until a complete data structure is obtained. The combination of these three stages forms the concept of data analysis in a web project.
- Presenting search criteria for relevant information;
- Presenting the algorithm for analyzing the user page on the web project;
- Presenting the algorithm for forming a structural tree of page searches;
- Full access to the functionality of the web project platform for the software;
- Access to the environments of the received information storage for the software.
- To implement the conditions, it is necessary:
- To build the functionality for user-submitted input data that will set the search criteria for information;
- To have the presence of existing research on the structure of the user page in the web project;
- To use third-party libraries and analyze the main nodes of the user page on the web project;
- To build a software authorization mechanism in each web project.
- Stage 1. Analysis of web project page headers and metadata.
- Stage 2. Working with page areas. There are four main areas of the page, namely: personal information, multimedia content, direct links and posts. Since the presented zones are isolated and structurally independent units of the page content itself, the analysis of zones is carried out in several different ways that are parallel to each other.
- Stage 3. Direct retrieval of data from the elements of each zone. The list of elements and metadata for their analysis must be stored in a database.
- Stage 4. Saving the received data to the database and system resources.
- Receiving the request URL by the routing system;
- Forwarding the request to the appropriate controller;
- Query header analysis;
- Identification of the client by the security provider;
- Analysis of the request’s input parameters;
- Forwarding the request further on the stack of calls to functionality and services;
- Calling the appropriate services to form a response to the client.
4. Results and Discussion
- Search for user data in diverse platforms of web projects with further consolidation into a single profile for each user;
- Quantitative analysis of users of each web project platform.
- 347,255 profiles and 2631 web projects on the Facebook platform;
- 293,283 profiles and 1984 web projects on the Instagram platform;
- 90,726 profiles and 797 web projects on the TikTok platform;
- 137,821 profiles and 1395 web projects on the YouTube platform;
- 60,228 profiles and 529 web projects on the LinkedIn platform;
- 30,172 profiles and 348 web projects on the Pinterest platform.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhao, T.; Cheng, G.; Liu, H. A partially linear framework for massive heterogeneous data. Ann. Stat. 2016, 44, 1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, B.; Song, Y.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J. Analysis model for server consolidation of virtualized heterogeneous data centers providing internet services. Clust. Comput. 2019, 22, 911–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loorak, M.H.; Perin, C.; Collins, C.; Carpendale, S. Exploring the possibilities of embedding heterogeneous data attributes in familiar visualizations. Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016, 23, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tovletoglou, K.; Mukhanov, L.; Nikolopoulos, D.S.; Karakonstantis, G. HaRMony: Heterogeneous-Reliability Memory and QoS-Aware Energy Management on Virtualized Servers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Providence, RI, USA, 17 December 2020; pp. 575–590. [Google Scholar]
- Noor, A.; Jha, D.N.; Mitra, K.; Jayaraman, P.P.; Souza, A.; Ranjan, R.; Dustdar, S. A framework for monitoring microservice-oriented cloud applications in heterogeneous virtualization environments. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), Milan, Italy, 8–13 July 2019; pp. 156–163. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yen, N.; Mei, L.; Luo, X.; Wei, X.; Hu, C. Crowdsourcing based description of urban emergency events using social media big data. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 2020, 8, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Izonin, I.; Kryvinska, N.; Tkachenko, R.; Zub, K. An approach towards missing data recovery within IoT smart system. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 155, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shakhovska, N.; Kaminskyy, R.; Zasoba, E.; Tsiutsiura, M. Association rules mining in big data. Int. J. Comput. 2018, 17, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
- Ghani, N.A.; Hamid, S.; Hashem, I.A.T.; Ahmed, E. Social media big data analytics: A survey. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 101, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haustein, S. Grand challenges in altmetrics: Heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies. Scientometrics 2016, 108, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Castano, S.; de Antonellis, V. Global viewing of heterogeneous data sources. Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2001, 13, 277–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L. Heterogeneous data and big data analytics. Autom. Control Inf. Sci. 2017, 3, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thomas, J.; Sael, L. Overview of Integrative Analysis Methods for Heterogeneous Data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BIGCOMP), Jeju, Korea, 9–11 February 2015; pp. 266–270. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y.; Philip, S.Y.A. Survey of heterogeneous information network analysis. Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2016, 29, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fedushko, S.; Benova, E. Semantic analysis for information and communication threats detection of online service users. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019, 160, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markovets, O.; Pazderska, R.; Horpyniuk, O.; Syerov, Y. Informational Support of Effective Work of the Community Manager with Web Communities. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2019, 2654, 710–722. [Google Scholar]
- Lodhia, S.; Stone, G. Integrated reporting in an internet and social media communication environment: Conceptual insights. Aust. Account. Rev. 2017, 27, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iavich, M.; Gnatyuk, S.; Fesenko, G. Cyber security european standards in business. Sci. Pract. Cyber Secur. J. 2019, 3, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, Z.; Gnatyuk, S.; Okhrimenko, T.; Tynymbayev, S.; Iavich, M. High-speed and secure PRNG for cryptographic applications. Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur. 2020, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.J.; Outley, C.; Matarrita-Cascante, D.; Murphrey, T.P. A systematic review of recent research on adolescent social connectedness and mental health with internet technology use. Adolesc. Res. Rev. 2016, 1, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daoust, F. Report from the world wide web consortium. SMPTE Motion Imaging J. 2018, 127, 72–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Chaudhry, S.; Li, L.; Cao, X.; Guo, X.; Vogel, D.; Zhang, X. Exploring the influence of social media on employee work performance. Internet Res. 2016, 26, 529–545. [Google Scholar]
- Krishen, A.S.; Berezan, O.; Agarwal, S.; Kachroo, P. The generation of virtual needs: Recipes for satisfaction in social media networking. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 5248–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hjorth, L.; Hinton, S. Understanding Social Media; SAGE Publications Limited: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2019; p. 232. [Google Scholar]
- Korzh, R.; Peleshchyshyn, A.; Syerov, Y.; Fedushko, S. Principles of university’s information image protection from aggression. In Proceedings of the 2016 XIth International Scientific and Technical Conference Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), Lviv, Ukraine, 6–10 September 2016; pp. 77–79. [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez, F.S.; Pabst, A.; Luck, T.; König, H.-H.; Angermeyer, M.C.; Witte, A.V. Social network types in old age and incident dementia. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry Neurol. 2018, 31, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fedushko, S.; Syerov, Y.; Kolos, S. Hashtag as a way of archiving and distributing information on the internet. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2019, 2386, 274–286. [Google Scholar]
- Ritzer, G. The McDonaldization of Society, 20th ed.; SAGE Publications Limited: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013; p. 237. [Google Scholar]
- Borgatti, S.; Everett, M.; Johnson, J. Analyzing Social Networks; SAGE Publications Limited: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018; p. 384. [Google Scholar]
- Molnár, E.; Molnár, R.; Kryvinska, N.; Greguš, M. Web intelligence in practice. J. Serv. Sci. Res. 2014, 6, 149–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poniszewska-Maranda, A.; Kaczmarek, D.; Kryvinska, N.; Xhafa, F. Studying usability of AI in the IoT systems/paradigm through embedding NN techniques into mobile smart service system. Computing 2019, 101, 1661–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kryvinska, N.; Bickel, L. Scenario-based analysis of IT enterprises servitization as a part of digital transformation of modern economy. J. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Poniszewska-Maranda, A.; Matusiak, R.; Kryvinska, N. A real-time service system in the cloud. J. Ambient Intell. Hum. Comput. 2020, 11, 961–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gregus, M.; Kryvinska, N. Service Orientation of Enterprises-Aspects, Dimensions, Technologies; Comenius University in Bratislava: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Briciu, V.A.; Nechita, F.; Demeter, R.; Kavoura, A. Minding the gap between perceived and projected destination image by using information and communication platforms and software. Int. J. Comput. Methods Herit. Sci. 2019, 3, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Balomenou, N.; Garrod, B. Photographs in tourism research: Prejudice, power, performance and participant-generated images. Tour. Manag. 2019, 70, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Web Project Type | Characteristic | Example of an Active Web Project |
---|---|---|
Information web projects | Created for people who are looking for solutions to various problems. | HGTV Discussion Forums, Do-It-Yourself Community |
Web projects for communication | Allow communication between users through text and graphical information (messages, posts, comments, publications, news, photos, videos), forming communities. | Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Bado |
Multimedia web projects | Focused on the distribution and exchange of multimedia content. This type of platform allows users to upload their own videos, process them, track their statistics and watch other users’ videos. | YouTube, Flickr, Shots, Periscope, Instagram |
Educational web projects | Designed to quickly integrate users of web projects into the learning process. These communities have specialized functionality. | The Student Room Group, ePALS School Blog |
Professional web projects | Created to promote career growth for users. A community member’s profile is presented in the form of a resume, which allows recruitment specialists to directly assess the level of qualification and compliance with vacancies in companies. Users can use infographics to display their career history. Professional communities also include academic web communities. | LinkedIn, Xing, Sumry, ResearchGate, Academia.edu |
Diverse web projects | Focused on the accumulation of diverse data. These web projects are a knowledge base or repository of diverse information (photos, videos, mp3s, games, text, etc.) | Figshare, Open Science Framework, Mendeley Data, Zenodo |
Web Project Platform | [≤;17] | [18;24] | [25;34] | [35;44] | [45;54] | [55;≤] | Sum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12% | 29% | 38% | 13% | 4% | 4% | 347,255 | |
15% | 30% | 34% | 16% | 3% | 2% | 293,283 | |
TikTok | 43% | 21% | 20% | 14% | 1% | 1% | 90,726 |
YouTube | 10% | 18% | 28% | 20% | 15% | 9% | 137,821 |
8% | 19% | 39% | 26% | 5% | 3% | 60,228 | |
5% | 17% | 29% | 24% | 16% | 9% | 30,172 | |
Total | 959,485 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Fedushko, S.; Mastykash, O.; Syerov, Y.; Peracek, T. Model of User Data Analysis Complex for the Management of Diverse Web Projects during Crises. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 9122. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249122
Fedushko S, Mastykash O, Syerov Y, Peracek T. Model of User Data Analysis Complex for the Management of Diverse Web Projects during Crises. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(24):9122. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249122
Chicago/Turabian StyleFedushko, Solomiia, Oleg Mastykash, Yuriy Syerov, and Tomas Peracek. 2020. "Model of User Data Analysis Complex for the Management of Diverse Web Projects during Crises" Applied Sciences 10, no. 24: 9122. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249122
APA StyleFedushko, S., Mastykash, O., Syerov, Y., & Peracek, T. (2020). Model of User Data Analysis Complex for the Management of Diverse Web Projects during Crises. Applied Sciences, 10(24), 9122. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249122