Next Article in Journal
The Operation Analysis of the Innovative MainBox Food Storage Device
Next Article in Special Issue
A Photo Identification Framework to Prevent Copyright Infringement with Manipulations
Previous Article in Journal
Application of an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI) for Residual Particle Measurement in an Epitaxial Growth Reactor
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 16
10.3390/app11167681
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Expert Recommendation for Answering Questions on Social Media

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(16), 7681; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167681
by Kyoungsoo Bok 1, Heesub Song 2, Dojin Choi 2, Jongtae Lim 2, Deukbae Park 2 and Jaesoo Yoo 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Joanna Simos
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(16), 7681; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167681
Submission received: 6 August 2021 / Revised: 17 August 2021 / Accepted: 19 August 2021 / Published: 20 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Computing and Big Data Analysis: Latest Advances and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A fascinating topic approached with diligent research!

The introduction is concise and clear and could be further expanded to included real examples from social media to further illustrated the relevance and significance of expert recommendation and recommenders. 

In the same way, the conclusion would benefit from an additional paragraph correlating the outcomes to recognizable examples in social media.

The results section is packed with crucial information and can be further broken down to present the data in a ways that is less conflated and more readable. 

The use of language needs some review to ensure this great research is presented in a way that validates the work to the full extent. For example at the beginning of the abstract, it is unclear if the "expert recommendation  method"  refers to a person as the sentence then continues with "who". If so, then the first sentence needs to be corrected accordingly. If not, then the use of "who" is incorrect. Spelling and grammar need review throughout the text. For example, the 'Architecture' section title is spelled incorrectly. 

Thank you and good luck with this interesting work!

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We would like to sincerely thank you for your attentive indications and good comments. Our paper is partially rewritten in order to revise and complement your comments. Please refer to the attached file about the detailed revisions.

Many thanks.

Best regards,

Jaesoo Yoo

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

  1. Figure 1 may be needed to add interactions between the "Expert Recommendation" component and the "Expertise Analysis" component.
  2. It may need to add the other components too.
  3. The knowledge system may consider the qualify of knowledge. 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We would like to sincerely thank you for your attentive indications and good comments. Our paper is partially rewritten in order to revise and complement your comments. Please refer to the attached file about the detailed revisions.

Many thanks.

Best regards,

Jaesoo Yoo

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop