Next Article in Journal
A Method of Enhancing Rapidly-Exploring Random Tree Robot Path Planning Using Midpoint Interpolation
Previous Article in Journal
Biomechanical Evaluation Method to Optimize External Fixator Configuration in Long Bone Fractures—Conceptual Model and Experimental Validation Using Pilot Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Remaining Useful Life Prediction of the Concrete Piston Based on Probability Statistics and Data Driven

College of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(18), 8482; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188482
Submission received: 21 July 2021 / Revised: 22 August 2021 / Accepted: 6 September 2021 / Published: 13 September 2021

Abstract

:
This paper proposes a method on predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) of a concrete piston of a concrete pump truck based on probability statistics and data-driven approaches. Firstly, the average useful life of the concrete piston is determined by probability distribution fitting using actual life data. Secondly, according to condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck, a concept of life coefficient of the concrete piston is proposed to represent the influence of the loading condition on the actual useful life of individual concrete pistons, and different regression models are established to predict the RUL of the concrete pistons. Finally, according to the prediction result of the concrete piston at different life stages, a replacement warning point is established to provide support for the inventory management and replacement plan of the concrete piston.

1. Preface

Along with the continuous progress of modern manufacturing technology, the structure of mechanical and electrical systems is more and more complex, which brings new challenges to fault prediction and health management of the system. Parts are important components of mechanical and electrical product systems, once the parts fail, it may affect the healthy operation of the whole system, or even cause serious loss of life and property. Therefore, the remaining useful life (RUL) prediction of parts has become a key research issue of fault prediction and health management [1,2,3]. Lei Y et al. [4] provided a review on machinery prognostics following its whole program, i.e., from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Jay Lee et al. [5] provided a review on the system design of prognostics and health management, and gave a tutorial for the selection of RUL prediction approaches by comparing their advantages and disadvantages.
At present, a number of research on the RUL prediction of parts have reported [6,7,8], and approaches of RUL prediction can be roughly grouped into three categories. The first category is the prediction method based on physical models, which estimates the RUL of parts according to the degradation mechanism. Leser et al. [9] validated the crack growth modeling method using damage diagnosis data based on structural health monitoring, and a probabilistic prediction of RUL is formed for a metallic, single-edge notch tension specimen with a fatigue crack growing under mixed-mode conditions. Habib et al. [10] evaluated the stress of A310 aircraft wings during each loading cycle through a finite element analysis, and they predicted the RUL of A310 wings using the Paris Law technique based on linear elastic fracture mechanics. Chen et al. [11] developed a novel computational modelling technique for the prediction of crack growth in load bearing orthopaedic alloys subjected to fatigue loading, which can predict the RUL of parts through the crack path. The second category is the prediction method based on probability statistics, which fit the failure data of parts to obtain the characteristic distribution of life through a statistical distribution model. Wang et al. [12] proposed a novel method based on the three-parameter Weibull distribution proportional hazards model to predict the RUL of rolling bearings, the model is able to produce accurate RUL predictions for the tested bearings and outperforms the popular two-parameter model. Pan et al. [13] proposed a remanufacturability evaluation scheme based on the average RUL of the structural arm, and made a comprehensive evaluation by establishing the reliability parameter model of the structural arm. Xu et al. [14] discussed the influence of different distribution function values on the prediction results by analyzing different parameter estimation methods, and established the RUL prediction model based on the failure data of parts. Rong et al. [15] determined the average useful life of the pump truck boom based on the Weibull distribution function by using the failure data, and predicted the RUL of the boom by using the used time. The third category is the data-driven prediction method. Ren et al. [16] analyzed the time-domain and frequency-domain characteristics of rolling bearing vibration signals, and established the RUL prediction model of rolling bearing based on deep neural networks. Liu et al. [17] proposed an RUL prediction framework based on multiple health state assessments that divide the entire bearing life into several health states, where a local regression model can be built individually. Zio et al. [18] proposed a methodology for the estimation of the RUL of parts based on particle filtering. Sun et al. [19] used support vector machines to build degradation models for bearing RUL prediction. Maio et al. [20] proposed a combination of a relevance vector machine and model fitting as a prognostic procedure for estimating the RUL of degraded thrust ball bearings. Deutsch et al. [21] proposed a deep learning-based approach for the RUL prediction of rotating parts with big data.
With more and more information available to mechanical devices, many new methods have been applied to prediction models. Mad et al. [22] used a physical model to generate health indices whose evolution can be estimated and predicted online. Xu J et al. [23] combined the monitoring sensor data and integrated the strengths of the data-driven prognostics approach and the experience-based approach, while reducing their respective limitations.
The RUL prediction, based on physical model needs to establish accurate models to describe failure degradation mechanism of parts, while the RUL prediction, based on probability statistics, does not consider the actual working state of different parts, so the application of both methods is limited. With the support of modern information technology and the industrial Internet of Things technology, mechanical and electrical product systems are becoming more and more intelligent, so more and more data on the working status can be obtained, which brings great potential for data driven RUL prediction research [24].
A concrete pump truck is a kind of construction vehicle which uses hydraulic pressure to deliver concrete continuously through the pipeline. A concrete piston, which is located in the conveying cylinder of the pump truck, as shown in Figure 1, is an important part of the concrete pump truck. When the concrete piston is working, it reciprocates in the concrete medium of the conveying cylinder, provides pressure for the concrete, pumps the concrete to a remote place, and plays a sealing role at the same time. The working environment of the concrete piston is very harsh, and it is difficult to establish an accurate failure degradation model and obtain the operating state data directly. At present, there is limited research on the RUL prediction of the concrete piston. By using the condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck and the replacement information data of the concrete piston, this paper puts forward an RUL prediction method of the concrete piston based on probability statistics and condition monitoring data, and the validity of the method is verified through the result analysis and model application.
Figure 2 shows the flowchart of the proposed methodology for RUL prediction. The methodology is divided into two phases: offline and online. In the offline phase, the replacement information data form different concrete pistons are used to fit features based on the Weibull distribution, the condition monitoring data from different concrete pump trucks are used to fit features based on regression algorithm, and the RUL prediction model is built. In the online phase, the RUL of the concrete piston is estimated based on the condition monitoring data from a new concrete pump truck and the real-time working life.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the basic situation of the data. In Section 3, we establish the RUL prediction model of the concrete piston based on probability statistics and data-driven approaches. Section 4 discusses the prediction effect of different regression models, and we use the best prediction model to propose setting the replacement warning point of the concrete piston in Section 5, and conclusions are finally provided.

2. Data Overview

2.1. Data Source

The data studied in this paper were collected from 129 concrete pump trucks of a construction machinery enterprise from January to December 2019, including two types of data: condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck and replacement information data of the concrete piston. The condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck includes time, GPS latitude, GPS longitude, engine speed, hydraulic oil temperature, system pressure, pumping capacity, cumulative fuel consumption, reversing frequency, cumulative working time, and pump truck status, etc., which are uploaded to the enterprise’s networked operation and maintenance platform through the Internet of Things. The replacement information data, which refers to the actual working life of the concrete piston when it is replaced because of failure, is directly inputted into the networked operation and maintenance platform by the service engineer of the enterprise.

2.2. Data Description

According to the functional characteristics of the concrete piston, this paper studies five condition monitoring data related to the working state of the concrete pump truck, including engine speed, system pressure, pumping capacity, reversing frequency, and cumulative working time. The specific meaning of the condition monitoring data is shown in Table 1.
The condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck includes “equipment number”, “parameter name”, “parameter value” and “server receiving time”, totaling more than 2.8 million pieces. The replacement information data of the concrete piston includes “equipment number”, “replacement timing” and “replacement date”, totaling 325 pieces.

2.3. Data Preprocessing

The condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck studied in this paper are time series data collected by sensors. Due to factors such as the timing error of sensors or poor communication conditions, certain data are missed in the data set. For the four types of data, such as engine speed, system pressure, pumping capacity, and reversing frequency, the missing data may be very close to the data uploaded the previous time due to the high data collecting frequency, so the nearest complement method is adopted to fill in missed data. The cumulative working time is accumulated data; it can be assumed that the changing of the cumulative working time is slow and uniform, so the linear interpolation method is adopted to fill the missed data [25]. The original data of the engine speed in a certain period of time is shown in Figure 3, and the processed data is shown in Figure 4.

3. Model Building

3.1. Model Construction

If actual working life data of the concrete piston is known, the appropriate probability statistical distribution model can be selected to fit the data, and the characteristic distribution of the life can be obtained, which can be used to estimate the average useful life. During the operation of the concrete piston, the working state of the concrete pump truck will have an impact on its actual working life, so a concept of life coefficient is proposed based on the condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck, and the RUL prediction model of the concrete piston is established, as shown in Equation (1).
M r = α · M t M 0
where M r is the RUL of the concrete piston, α is the life coefficient of the concrete piston related to condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck, M t is the average useful life of the concrete piston, and M 0 is the real-time working life of the concrete piston.

3.2. The Average Useful Life of the Concrete Piston

In the failure probability distribution function of parts, there are several kinds of common distribution functions: exponential distribution, normal distribution, lognormal distribution, Weibull distribution, etc. Among them, the Weibull distribution is the most widely used due to its high degree of fitting and good effect for parts which undergo notable degradation before final failure [25]. The main failure mode of the concrete piston is dissipation failure, so this paper uses the Weibull distribution to study the average useful life of the concrete piston.
The probability density function of the two-parameter Weibull distribution is:
f ( x ) = k λ ( x λ ) k 1 exp [ ( x λ ) k ] , 0 x , λ > 0 , k > 0
where λ is the scale parameter, called the characteristic life, which is an average value of the life of the parts; k is the shape parameter, which is the failure form of the parts.
The failure distribution function of the Weibull distribution is:
F ( x ) = 1 exp [ 1 ( x λ ) k ]
The average useful life M t of the concrete piston is represented by the expected value of the failure distribution function:
M t = λ Γ ( 1 + 1 k )
where Γ is the gamma function.
According to the replacement information data of the concrete piston, we can obtain the actual working life data, arrange it in increasing order, calculate it by the common median rank, and estimate the parameters of the Weibull distribution based on the least square method. The fitting results are shown in Figure 5, and the fitting error is not higher than 0.056.
Substitute λ = 243.7813 and k = 10.8906 into Formula (4), the expected value of the Weibull distribution failure distribution function is obtained, and the average useful life of the concrete piston M t = 239.6256 h.

3.3. The Life Coefficient of the Concrete Piston

As the concrete piston is a mechanical part dominated by wear failure, it is expected to wear faster under a higher-strength working environment, so the working time of the concrete pump truck under a high-load working state has a greater impact on its life. Referring to the working environment and material properties of the concrete piston, the high-load working state is determined by parameters, such as engine speed, system pressure, pumping capacity, and reversing frequency. According to the actual performance parameters of the concrete pump truck, the definition of the high-load working state is shown in Table 2.
According to the definition of the high-load working state of the concrete pump truck, condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck corresponding to the actual working life data of the concrete piston is statistically analyzed. The ratio of the high-load working state of the concrete piston in the life cycle of engine speed, system pressure, pumping capacity, and reversing frequency for 325 pieces is calculated respectively, which is recorded as A, B, C, D, as shown in Table 3. The life coefficient α is calculated by the average useful life M t and the real-time working life M 0 according to Formula (1), and the results are shown in Table 3.
The correlation coefficients between A, B, C, D and α are calculated respectively, and the results are −0.6548, −0.5583, −0.4863 and −0.5379. Obviously, the negative correlation between them are a little high.
Taking the four types of high-load working state proportions as inputs and the life coefficient α as outputs, a prediction model on α is established by different algorithms. Considering the number of datasets is only 325, Multiple linear regression (MLR), Support vector regression (SVR), and Random forest regression(RFR) are selected because of their good performance with a small amount of samples for RUL prediction.

3.3.1. MLR

MLR is used to predict the dependent variable as a linear combination of independent ones; it can map the relationship between a dependent variable and explanatory variables. The model is defined as:
y i = β 0 + β 1 x 1 i + β 2 x 2 i + + β k x k i + ε i , i = 1 , 2 , , n
where y i is response vector, x k i is regression matrix, β k is regression coefficient, ε i is random error.

3.3.2. SVR

SVR is one of the applications of the Support Vector Machine (SVM). The SVM constructs a hyperplane in a high-dimensional space, which can be used for classification and regression. For a given dataset { ( x i , y i ) ,   i = 1 , 2 ,   , n } , where x i R d ,   y i R , and n is the capacity of samples, x i = [ x i 1 , x i 2 , , x i d ] T are the input vectors, y i is the associated output value. The regression mode can be expressed as follows:
f ( x ) = ω A ^ · x + b
where ω is a d-dimensional vector and b is the bias term.

3.3.3. RFR

RFR is an extension of the decision tree algorithm, in which decision trees are combined and each decision tree is independently trained. The training procedure was employed as follows:
(1) from the training dataset, a bootstrap sample was drawn as a randomized subset;
(2) each individual tree was grown using the randomized subset of predictor variables. Each tree model f ( x i ) was defined as y i = f ( x i ) + ε i . The trees were grown to the largest extent possible without pruning;
(3) repeat the step (2) until the number of trees was grown. Then the predicted results were aggregated by averaging them [26].

4. Result Analysis

The dataset of the concrete piston life prediction shown in Table 3 is randomly divided into a training set and a test set according to a ratio of 8:2. The three algorithms of MLR, SVR, and RFR are used to calculate the life coefficient α using the data of the training set. The derived α is then used to predict the life of the parts in the test set using the Formula (1) program in Python and invoking toolkits to calculate, analyze, and draw. The predicted life of the concrete piston calculated by each model is compared with the actual working life, as shown in Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8.
As can be seen from Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, among the three prediction models, the SVR model has the best prediction effect.
The root mean square error (RMSE), as shown in Formula (7), is used to evaluate the prediction results.
R M S E = 1 n i n ( y ^ i y i ) 2
where y ^ is the predicted capacity value, and y is the real capacity value.
The RMSE refers to the square root of the mean of the square of all the errors in the estimated number n . A smaller RMSE value indicates a more accurate prediction.
In order to make a detailed comparison and analysis of the prediction accuracy of each model, a five-fold cross-validation is carried out. The dataset is divided into five subsets on average. Four subsets are selected as the training set and the remaining subset as the test set each time. A total of five validation calculations are carried out, and the RMSE values of each model are obtained, as shown in Figure 9. As can be seen from Figure 9, the prediction errors of each model are generally stable, among which the RMSE value of the SVR model is the lowest and the prediction effect is the best, so we chose the SVR model to predict the RUL of the concrete piston online.

5. Dependence of RUL Prediction on Working Time

In order to further analyze the prediction effect of the life prediction model on different working times of the concrete piston, life prediction was performed at a step size of 5% of the actual working life, with a typical result of on α and RUL prediction shown in Table 4. In Table 4, M a is the actual RUL of the concrete piston.
Three concrete pistons with an actual working life of 210, 240 and 270 h, respectively, were selected to analyze the prediction effect of the model, and all the data are calculated to draw the RMSE curve of the prediction results, as shown in Figure 10. From Figure 10a–c, it can be seen that the prediction effect is best when the actual working life reaches approximately 80%. The RUL of 325 concrete pistons is predicted using the proposed method, where the estimation error is less than 4.73%. Figure 10d shows the averaged RMSE value on the predicted RUL at different working times. It can be seen that, in the early-life stage of the concrete piston, the prediction has a large error due to less condition monitoring data. However, the prediction accuracy improves as the working time increases until the working time is at 80% of the actual working life. Then, the prediction accuracy becomes worse as the working time increases.
At present, the concrete pistons of the concrete pump trucks are not replaced preventively due to the lack of supportive approaches. They are usually replaced after wearing until failure, which often leads to the unplanned downtime of the concrete pump truck, causing unnecessary economic losses and even affecting the project’s progress. To achieve preventive replacement, it is very important to choose an appropriate replacement time. Replacing too early will lead to increased costs, and replacing too late may lead to unplanned downtime. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a replacement plan when the working time is close to the actual working life and the prediction error is small. Through the research of this work, it is found that the RUL prediction model of the concrete piston based on probability statistics and data-driven methods has the best prediction effect when the concrete piston working life reaches 80% of the predicted RUL; this result can be used for the formulation of preventive replacement plans. It can be set as a replacement warning point, which can be used as the main basis for maintenance according to the situation, and a reasonable maintenance replacement and inventory management plan can be developed to reduce costs and economic losses.

6. Conclusions

This paper proposes a new method for predicting the RUL of the concrete piston based on probability statistics and data-driven methods. A life coefficient is proposed to link the actual life of individual concrete pistons and the average useful life derived from the actual replacement data of a set of concrete pistons. The life coefficient is considered to be mainly affected by the load working state, and it is found that support vector regression could provide a good estimation on the life coefficient. The RUL of 325 concrete pistons is predicted using the proposed method, where the estimation error is less than 4.73%. It is also found that that the prediction accuracy is best when the working life reaches 80% of the predicted useful life, which puts forward the replacement warning point to provide support for inventory management and a replacement plan of the concrete piston.

Author Contributions

Data curation, X.L.; Funding acquisition, H.Z.; Methodology, Y.T.; Project administration, B.G.; Writing—original draft, J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71690233, 71971213).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Doyen, L.; Gaudoin, O. Modelling and assessment of aging and efficiency of corrective and planned preventive maintenance. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2011, 60, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Heng, A.; Zhang, S.; Tan, A.C.; Mathew, J. Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art, challenges and opportunities. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2009, 23, 724–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, D.; Makis, V.; Jafari, L.; Yu, J. Optimal maintenance policy and residual life estimation for a slowly degrading system subject to condition monitoring. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2015, 134, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lei, Y.; Li, N.; Guo, L.; Li, N.; Yan, T.; Lin, J. Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2018, 104, 799–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, J.; Wu, F.; Zhao, W.; Ghaffari, M.; Liao, L.; Siegel, D. Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—Reviews, methodology and applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2014, 42, 314–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vachtsevanos, G.; Lewis, F.; Roemer, M.; Hess, A.; Wu, B. Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liao, L.; Kottig, F. Review of Hybrid Prognostics Approaches for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Engineered Systems, and an Application to Battery Life Prediction. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2014, 63, 191–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Si, X.; Wang, W.; Hu, C.; Zhou, D. Remaining useful life estimation: A review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011, 213, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leser, P.; Hochhalter, J.; Newman, J.; Leser, W.; Warner, J.; Wawrzynek, P.; Yuan, F. Probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis using surrogate models trained via three-dimensional finite element analysis. Struct. Health Monit. 2017, 16, 291–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Habib, S.; Yousuf, W.; Mairaj, T.; Khalid, S. Fatigue Crack Growth prediction on A310 aircraft wing using static analysis. In Proceedings of the International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan, 10–14 January 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, J.; Browne, M.; Taylor, M.; Gregson, P. Application of an interface failure model to predict fatigue crack growth in an implanted metallic femoral stem. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2004, 73, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Li, Z. Remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearings based on the three-parameter Weibull distribution proportional hazards model. Ins.-Non-Des. Test Con. Monit. 2020, 62, 710–718. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pan, Q.; Xie, W.; He, S. Assessment on Remanufacturability of the Placer Jib of Concrete Pump Truck Based on Reliability Model. Mach. Des. Res. 2015, 109–113. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu, W.; Hu, W.; Sun, P. Research on Equipment Reliability Prediction Based on Two-parameter Weibull Distribution. Chin. J. Constr. Mach. 2013, 11, 112–116. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rong, T.; Meng, B. Remaining Life Evaluation of Boom System of the concrete pump truck Based on Weibull Distribution. Mech. Eng. Tech. 2018, 7, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ren, L.; Cui, J.; Sun, Y. Multi-bearing remaining useful life collaborative prediction: A deep learning approach. J. Manuf. Syst. 2017, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Z.; Zuo, M.; Qin, Y. Remaining useful life prediction of rolling element bearings based on health state assessment. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2016, 230, 314–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zio, E.; Peloni, G. Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, C.; Zhang, Z.; He, Z. Research on bearing life prediction based on support vector machine and its application. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2011, 305, 012028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maio, F.; Tsui, K.; Zio, E. Combining relevance vector machines and exponential regression for bearing residual life estimation. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 2012, 31, 405–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deutsch, J.; He, D. Using Deep Learning-Based Approach to Predict Remaining Useful Life of Rotating Components. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2017, 48, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Djeziri, M.A.; Benmoussa, S.; Mouchaweh, M.S.; Lughofer, E. Fault diagnosis and prognosis based on physical knowledge and reliability data: Application to MOS Field-Effect Transistor. Microelectron. Reliab. 2020, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L. PHM-Oriented Integrated Fusion Prognostics for Aircraft Engines Based on Sensor Data. IEEE Sens. J. 2014, 14, 1124–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Okoh, C.; Roy, R.; Mehnen, J.; Redding, L. Overview of Remaining Useful Life Prediction Techniques in Through-life Engineering Services. Proc. CIRP 2014, 16, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ling, D.; He, L.; Xu, H. Fatigue Residual Life Reliability Prediction Method Based on Weibull Distribution. J. Mach. Desi. 2011, 28, 50–54. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jchabd, E.; Yctb, D.; Pywab, E. Predictive modeling of blood pressure during hemodialysis: A comparison of linear model, random forest, support vector regression, XGBoost, LASSO regression and ensemble method. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020, 195, 105536. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Concrete pump truck and concrete piston.
Figure 1. Concrete pump truck and concrete piston.
Applsci 11 08482 g001
Figure 2. Flowchart of the RUL prediction.
Figure 2. Flowchart of the RUL prediction.
Applsci 11 08482 g002
Figure 3. The original data.
Figure 3. The original data.
Applsci 11 08482 g003
Figure 4. The processed data.
Figure 4. The processed data.
Applsci 11 08482 g004
Figure 5. Least squares fitting diagram.
Figure 5. Least squares fitting diagram.
Applsci 11 08482 g005
Figure 6. MLR model.
Figure 6. MLR model.
Applsci 11 08482 g006
Figure 7. SVR model.
Figure 7. SVR model.
Applsci 11 08482 g007
Figure 8. RFR model.
Figure 8. RFR model.
Applsci 11 08482 g008
Figure 9. Comparison diagram of RMSE value of each model.
Figure 9. Comparison diagram of RMSE value of each model.
Applsci 11 08482 g009
Figure 10. Prediction results. (a) Actual working life of 210 h; (b) Actual working life of 240 h; (c) Actual working life of 270 h; (d) RMSE curve.
Figure 10. Prediction results. (a) Actual working life of 210 h; (b) Actual working life of 240 h; (c) Actual working life of 270 h; (d) RMSE curve.
Applsci 11 08482 g010
Table 1. Meanings of condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck.
Table 1. Meanings of condition monitoring data of the concrete pump truck.
NameData TypeUnitScopeMeaning
Engine Speed integral RPM0~2000The speed of pump truck engine
System Pressure integral MPa0~32pump hydraulic pressure of pumping system
Pumping Capacityintegral %0~100The percentage of pump truck in its maximum value
Reversing Frequencyintegral times/minute0~30Pump cylinder reversing times per minute
Cumulative Working Timefloating hour 0Cumulative working time of pump truck
Table 2. Definition table of high-load working state of the concrete pump truck.
Table 2. Definition table of high-load working state of the concrete pump truck.
NameUnit Normal RangeHigh-Load Working State
Engine Speed RPM0~2000≥1100
System Pressure MPa0~32≥20
Pumping Capacity%0~100≥40
Reversing FrequencyTimes/minute0~30≥10
Table 3. Dataset of the concrete piston life prediction.
Table 3. Dataset of the concrete piston life prediction.
NumberABCDM0α
10.5327 0.4649 0.2237 0.2131 275.7432 1.1507
20.4834 0.5586 0.2634 0.2056 258.7615 1.0779
30.4930 0.6394 0.2414 0.2527 232.4608 0.9701
40.4986 0.5002 0.1362 0.3006 257.3100 1.0738
50.6929 0.7160 0.3275 0.2343 269.2673 1.1237
60.5578 0.4718 0.3005 0.2156 236.1271 0.9854
70.4119 0.5886 0.2571 0.2779 263.5402 1.0998
80.4184 0.5829 0.2636 0.3029 259.3468 1.0823
90.4356 0.3802 0.2173 0.2318 264.6904 1.1046
100.7991 0.7307 0.3154 0.2297 229.6332 0.9583
110.6120 0.4617 0.1180 0.1447 256.2317 1.0693
120.6313 0.5106 0.3080 0.2707 254.0271 1.0601
130.4727 0.5465 0.1920 0.1924 264.5467 1.1040
140.3900 0.4855 0.2124 0.2814 261.2638 1.0903
150.5690 0.4688 0.3515 0.1846 258.9155 1.0805
160.3960 0.4253 0.1909 0.2327 265.2655 1.1070
170.6260 0.5851 0.1903 0.2584 220.7671 0.9213
180.4700 0.5367 0.1802 0.2610 264.2112 1.1026
190.5186 0.4900 0.3221 0.2101 240.6081 1.0041
200.3908 0.4339 0.1765 0.2387 256.1118 1.0688
210.4351 0.4570 0.1445 0.1752 253.8594 1.0594
220.3740 0.7600 0.4246 0.3216 214.8962 0.8968
230.5351 0.6035 0.3396 0.2556 233.5870 0.9748
240.4302 0.5646 0.2063 0.2923 236.6303 0.9875
250.5283 0.4452 0.2472 0.2426 244.3702 1.0198
260.6663 0.6448 0.2218 0.2453 228.8664 0.9551
270.5727 0.7697 0.3411 0.2537 219.0657 0.9142
280.6345 0.5055 0.2151 0.2957 232.2691 0.9693
290.5842 0.4344 0.2726 0.2262 253.6437 1.0585
300.6911 0.4715 0.2746 0.2917 244.1066 1.0187
310.5448 0.6426 0.2909 0.3201 233.3714 0.9739
320.3929 0.5887 0.2085 0.2582 238.4754 0.9952
330.5501 0.6243 0.1731 0.1468 247.1259 1.0313
340.5889 0.6195 0.2080 0.2483 252.7092 1.0546
350.7093 0.3554 0.3357 0.2742 247.8687 1.0344
360.3942 0.5236 0.2500 0.2306 253.4520 1.0577
370.7755 0.6721 0.3851 0.3027 237.2293 0.9900
380.4760 0.5225 0.1709 0.1920 252.3737 1.0532
390.5700 0.5270 0.3312 0.3010 239.8652 1.0010
400.7545 0.7045 0.3351 0.2761 228.3153 0.9528
410.5298 0.6320 0.3479 0.2816 224.8167 0.9382
420.5825 0.5987 0.2093 0.1327 227.9079 0.9511
430.5853 0.4876 0.1834 0.2694 217.8916 0.9093
440.5451 0.4701 0.3063 0.2326 252.9009 1.0554
450.4657 0.5438 0.2912 0.3321 245.7600 1.0256
460.5847 0.4798 0.3163 0.2012 235.1206 0.9812
470.7705 0.5957 0.2533 0.2740 230.4479 0.9617
480.6602 0.6436 0.3349 0.2553 232.0774 0.9685
490.5163 0.4518 0.2932 0.2523 280.4338 1.1703
500.4919 0.4107 0.1371 0.1977 248.3719 1.0365
510.5353 0.7071 0.3681 0.3211 213.4345 0.8907
520.6934 0.6488 0.3370 0.2824 233.9944 0.9765
530.6387 0.6471 0.3739 0.2274 241.2790 1.0069
540.4278 0.4885 0.1921 0.2458 246.6946 1.0295
550.6932 0.4207 0.2761 0.2872 242.2136 1.0108
560.5113 0.5023 0.1883 0.2215 253.3322 1.0572
570.5476 0.3089 0.1933 0.2920 252.1820 1.0524
580.6081 0.5186 0.3280 0.3104 231.7419 0.9671
590.3961 0.5079 0.2603 0.2196 260.6168 1.0876
600.3500 0.4500 0.1602 0.1790 263.3725 1.0991
610.5502 0.4101 0.3263 0.3634 249.2585 1.0402
620.5534 0.7115 0.2740 0.3103 230.5678 0.9622
630.4785 0.5300 0.2183 0.1731 260.3293 1.0864
640.5698 0.6483 0.2974 0.2842 235.8635 0.9843
650.3904 0.6349 0.3511 0.2974 233.3953 0.9740
660.7074 0.6328 0.2938 0.2446 231.8617 0.9676
670.5023 0.5521 0.3031 0.2701 238.1160 0.9937
680.6151 0.5705 0.2962 0.2476 234.2580 0.9776
690.6402 0.6849 0.3190 0.3735 235.0248 0.9808
700.5425 0.4229 0.3202 0.2349 259.1311 1.0814
710.3712 0.2922 0.2286 0.2336 247.1498 1.0314
720.6459 0.6576 0.2489 0.3010 231.8378 0.9675
730.4173 0.5811 0.4002 0.2432 241.3988 1.0074
740.5381 0.4812 0.2163 0.2784 246.9581 1.0306
750.5551 0.5284 0.3487 0.2546 242.4053 1.0116
760.5160 0.5578 0.3080 0.2523 242.2375 1.0109
770.5938 0.6039 0.3585 0.3144 234.3299 0.9779
780.6394 0.7066 0.3317 0.3065 225.4877 0.9410
790.3929 0.5261 0.2584 0.1987 249.4263 1.0409
800.3853 0.4664 0.1966 0.1815 254.3386 1.0614
810.5490 0.4925 0.1901 0.2395 255.7284 1.0672
820.4072 0.5081 0.1832 0.2050 268.5244 1.1206
830.4886 0.3629 0.2008 0.1686 271.1124 1.1314
840.7053 0.5604 0.3034 0.3427 216.3580 0.9029
850.4791 0.3072 0.2206 0.1546 253.4280 1.0576
860.5439 0.4260 0.1583 0.2440 250.6963 1.0462
870.4787 0.4619 0.2312 0.2319 270.0101 1.1268
880.5503 0.6096 0.2473 0.2190 250.5765 1.0457
890.6039 0.4221 0.2556 0.3442 234.9289 0.9804
900.5919 0.7085 0.2408 0.3349 214.0815 0.8934
910.4955 0.3821 0.3156 0.2506 248.3240 1.0363
920.5745 0.4788 0.2822 0.3193 231.8617 0.9676
930.6116 0.6443 0.2551 0.3027 234.6654 0.9793
940.6295 0.4652 0.3162 0.4058 225.7513 0.9421
950.5539 0.5181 0.2986 0.2226 247.7010 1.0337
960.6030 0.5657 0.3448 0.2144 237.2773 0.9902
970.4644 0.3807 0.1791 0.1555 272.2147 1.1360
980.6541 0.5545 0.4018 0.2551 240.7039 1.0045
990.4365 0.5885 0.3102 0.3304 242.4771 1.0119
1000.6328 0.6943 0.3283 0.2597 234.9529 0.9805
1010.5775 0.6414 0.2589 0.2481 225.5356 0.9412
1020.4527 0.5211 0.2768 0.2113 240.4164 1.0033
1030.5238 0.7210 0.3026 0.2791 228.6987 0.9544
1040.6701 0.8097 0.2931 0.2319 211.7092 0.8835
1050.5494 0.5042 0.1770 0.3102 243.0283 1.0142
1060.5987 0.6512 0.3512 0.3089 225.9669 0.9430
1070.5480 0.6019 0.3675 0.3097 236.6782 0.9877
1080.6178 0.5802 0.3709 0.2382 232.1014 0.9686
1090.5233 0.4629 0.2508 0.2647 264.5227 1.1039
1100.5416 0.6134 0.2541 0.3603 229.9927 0.9598
1110.6049 0.7044 0.2866 0.2677 233.7787 0.9756
1120.7767 0.7459 0.3312 0.2980 224.0499 0.9350
1130.7424 0.7940 0.2892 0.3641 229.4655 0.9576
1140.4251 0.3137 0.1863 0.2582 255.2013 1.0650
1150.4677 0.4836 0.2420 0.1943 247.6051 1.0333
1160.4719 0.5506 0.1208 0.2607 249.9535 1.0431
1170.7987 0.5091 0.2065 0.2828 244.6338 1.0209
1180.6100 0.5015 0.3600 0.3276 241.5426 1.0080
1190.6669 0.6183 0.2327 0.2860 238.7390 0.9963
1200.5130 0.5522 0.1823 0.1880 256.2796 1.0695
1210.5116 0.4400 0.2182 0.2465 265.7688 1.1091
1220.5734 0.4599 0.2170 0.2026 239.1463 0.9980
1230.5844 0.4862 0.2918 0.2739 213.8898 0.8926
1240.6483 0.5492 0.3449 0.3031 233.2516 0.9734
1250.3913 0.3401 0.1683 0.1353 262.7974 1.0967
1260.5527 0.6217 0.2720 0.2031 229.3457 0.9571
1270.5998 0.5637 0.2898 0.2458 236.9178 0.9887
1280.5878 0.4996 0.3996 0.3000 272.6939 1.1380
1290.5611 0.5380 0.2617 0.2755 241.4468 1.0076
1300.4203 0.4602 0.2533 0.2163 288.0779 1.2022
1310.5129 0.5617 0.3285 0.2422 235.8395 0.9842
1320.4408 0.3256 0.1743 0.1156 263.5642 1.0999
1330.6086 0.5302 0.3208 0.2517 241.1832 1.0065
1340.4683 0.5353 0.2151 0.2366 254.7699 1.0632
1350.5089 0.4360 0.1880 0.1649 263.9716 1.1016
1360.6593 0.5301 0.3008 0.3063 229.8728 0.9593
1370.6241 0.5892 0.3405 0.2801 234.7852 0.9798
1380.4846 0.5178 0.3320 0.2457 263.4923 1.0996
1390.4799 0.3837 0.2091 0.1693 270.0101 1.1268
1400.7492 0.7146 0.3966 0.2981 203.3463 0.8486
1410.5553 0.6123 0.2166 0.2633 227.1411 0.9479
1420.6203 0.5740 0.3016 0.3028 224.2656 0.9359
1430.6210 0.5310 0.2124 0.2406 253.7156 1.0588
1440.5969 0.7138 0.4393 0.2870 229.7770 0.9589
1450.6701 0.6351 0.2107 0.2495 245.9038 1.0262
1460.5613 0.5360 0.2391 0.2374 244.9213 1.0221
1470.5399 0.5594 0.2524 0.2649 258.5800 1.0791
1480.6639 0.6073 0.2783 0.3198 223.2592 0.9317
1490.5502 0.4978 0.2028 0.2773 235.4082 0.9824
1500.6114 0.5488 0.3251 0.3126 222.3726 0.9280
1510.5003 0.3057 0.1333 0.1959 250.6723 1.0461
1520.5456 0.6012 0.3290 0.3119 233.7787 0.9756
1530.5188 0.5440 0.3072 0.3005 240.8237 1.0050
1540.3839 0.4064 0.1277 0.1674 274.0838 1.1438
1550.5102 0.3532 0.1406 0.2123 261.3596 1.0907
1560.6292 0.5956 0.2766 0.2094 205.7665 0.8587
1570.5574 0.4750 0.2662 0.2037 254.0511 1.0602
1580.5551 0.5952 0.2645 0.2576 234.3299 0.9779
1590.5844 0.4964 0.2991 0.2398 269.4111 1.1243
1600.5046 0.5260 0.2890 0.3293 268.7401 1.1215
1610.5478 0.6837 0.3121 0.3214 218.9699 0.9138
1620.6041 0.6057 0.2931 0.2927 227.0453 0.9475
1630.5403 0.6416 0.3216 0.3729 239.9611 1.0014
1640.7262 0.6158 0.3376 0.2182 225.9190 0.9428
1650.5465 0.5881 0.2003 0.1856 263.9236 1.1014
1660.5625 0.5929 0.3478 0.2767 226.0388 0.9433
1670.4225 0.4387 0.2002 0.1501 261.0242 1.0893
1680.6945 0.6719 0.3022 0.2703 205.6467 0.8582
1690.5187 0.4585 0.2539 0.1418 260.0177 1.0851
1700.4601 0.7740 0.3655 0.2495 251.0797 1.0478
1710.6036 0.5835 0.3731 0.2935 231.8378 0.9675
1720.5160 0.5574 0.2100 0.2328 265.6489 1.1086
1730.5578 0.4984 0.2692 0.2352 230.6876 0.9627
1740.4149 0.5973 0.3432 0.3339 225.8232 0.9424
1750.5196 0.5593 0.2851 0.2697 260.8804 1.0887
1760.5180 0.6140 0.3687 0.2659 241.6145 1.0083
1770.5161 0.5074 0.2803 0.2277 262.1025 1.0938
1780.4803 0.5122 0.2569 0.1834 288.5811 1.2043
1790.5608 0.4847 0.2943 0.2037 234.4497 0.9784
1800.3483 0.5307 0.2151 0.1520 276.1206 1.1523
1810.4830 0.5920 0.2248 0.3274 237.4450 0.9909
1820.5922 0.4822 0.2869 0.1430 306.8645 1.2806
1830.6702 0.6951 0.3228 0.3498 233.3953 0.9740
1840.6646 0.5053 0.2649 0.2604 215.0879 0.8976
1850.6676 0.5642 0.3133 0.3632 225.6794 0.9418
1860.6223 0.6392 0.2231 0.2530 214.0336 0.8932
1870.6169 0.5294 0.2479 0.2073 263.9716 1.1016
1880.6417 0.5766 0.3144 0.2674 209.7922 0.8755
1890.4991 0.4622 0.3406 0.2389 255.1054 1.0646
1900.5732 0.4733 0.2561 0.2080 248.7553 1.0381
1910.4642 0.4482 0.1526 0.2511 278.2772 1.1613
1920.4705 0.4710 0.2948 0.2380 248.4438 1.0368
1930.3980 0.4314 0.2487 0.1844 270.2498 1.1278
1940.5619 0.5153 0.3043 0.2721 241.0873 1.0061
1950.5183 0.3431 0.1905 0.1427 255.5607 1.0665
1960.5378 0.6151 0.2805 0.3287 229.1779 0.9564
1970.6363 0.4785 0.2373 0.2320 254.3386 1.0614
1980.6498 0.6442 0.2928 0.3814 213.7700 0.8921
1990.4216 0.4310 0.1341 0.2889 265.1457 1.1065
2000.7010 0.5817 0.2524 0.3164 209.6484 0.8749
2010.5362 0.6251 0.2883 0.2724 218.4187 0.9115
2020.4864 0.5794 0.2506 0.2725 235.5759 0.9831
2030.6562 0.6062 0.2083 0.3454 255.9441 1.0681
2040.3499 0.3902 0.1461 0.1384 268.9558 1.1224
2050.6700 0.4900 0.2824 0.2015 229.6332 0.9583
2060.5129 0.7297 0.3784 0.2789 214.5368 0.8953
2070.5427 0.6054 0.2937 0.2557 228.7945 0.9548
2080.4656 0.3771 0.2523 0.2204 258.2205 1.0776
2090.5628 0.7643 0.3090 0.2544 229.8010 0.9590
2100.3204 0.4247 0.2268 0.2008 248.8751 1.0386
2110.4798 0.5539 0.1698 0.2075 265.8646 1.1095
2120.5834 0.5282 0.3478 0.2868 236.7741 0.9881
2130.5985 0.7345 0.3383 0.2557 234.4257 0.9783
2140.5664 0.7624 0.3659 0.2459 231.1429 0.9646
2150.5488 0.6883 0.2842 0.3029 211.3498 0.8820
2160.6220 0.5906 0.3377 0.3362 228.0038 0.9515
2170.4678 0.5518 0.2876 0.2269 258.2205 1.0776
2180.5724 0.5558 0.3123 0.2871 240.9915 1.0057
2190.5817 0.4938 0.3971 0.2734 231.0710 0.9643
2200.6025 0.6517 0.3293 0.2192 236.6542 0.9876
2210.4685 0.5601 0.2171 0.1900 262.4140 1.0951
2220.6209 0.7014 0.2363 0.3432 229.6811 0.9585
2230.4468 0.5704 0.3535 0.3161 249.2346 1.0401
2240.6542 0.5667 0.3371 0.2738 232.3170 0.9695
2250.6131 0.5116 0.3298 0.2219 231.8138 0.9674
2260.5320 0.6009 0.2380 0.2300 252.3018 1.0529
2270.4922 0.5774 0.3688 0.2073 244.8974 1.0220
2280.3778 0.5247 0.1892 0.2118 252.3018 1.0529
2290.5296 0.6142 0.3521 0.3223 241.1592 1.0064
2300.6014 0.5301 0.3349 0.3462 230.7115 0.9628
2310.4699 0.5192 0.2661 0.2243 240.2486 1.0026
2320.3846 0.3595 0.1690 0.2545 265.1937 1.1067
2330.4096 0.4316 0.2321 0.2468 252.5654 1.0540
2340.5039 0.5834 0.2477 0.2505 241.9739 1.0098
2350.6418 0.7229 0.2885 0.2730 251.0078 1.0475
2360.6329 0.7621 0.4740 0.3463 229.0341 0.9558
2370.4722 0.3236 0.1669 0.2484 259.2509 1.0819
2380.4912 0.4438 0.2486 0.3104 245.9757 1.0265
2390.5113 0.4463 0.1880 0.1897 249.0668 1.0394
2400.5153 0.6013 0.3866 0.3206 234.4018 0.9782
2410.6428 0.5521 0.3476 0.2764 223.1154 0.9311
2420.6321 0.6634 0.2359 0.2585 238.5233 0.9954
2430.5844 0.5470 0.2935 0.2552 240.1528 1.0022
2440.3498 0.4925 0.2679 0.2633 230.5917 0.9623
2450.3916 0.3891 0.1782 0.1629 243.2679 1.0152
2460.5404 0.6057 0.3468 0.2711 232.0774 0.9685
2470.4428 0.5545 0.1890 0.1716 257.5975 1.0750
2480.3722 0.4015 0.2488 0.1196 257.9809 1.0766
2490.4399 0.5011 0.1861 0.2124 260.2574 1.0861
2500.5272 0.6077 0.2032 0.2845 239.7694 1.0006
2510.6786 0.3383 0.2162 0.2228 235.3603 0.9822
2520.4391 0.4175 0.2117 0.2774 251.8465 1.0510
2530.3988 0.4560 0.1872 0.2227 246.8144 1.0300
2540.6330 0.5616 0.3023 0.2692 226.6619 0.9459
2550.6651 0.5741 0.2634 0.2190 225.6554 0.9417
2560.4153 0.5895 0.2481 0.2455 230.8553 0.9634
2570.4940 0.6101 0.2805 0.3141 212.0447 0.8849
2580.5217 0.4009 0.1944 0.1861 282.0633 1.1771
2590.6303 0.5292 0.2873 0.2560 252.7810 1.0549
2600.5108 0.6170 0.2965 0.2150 252.1580 1.0523
2610.5183 0.4238 0.2415 0.2348 263.6600 1.1003
2620.5485 0.3874 0.1971 0.2004 264.0914 1.1021
2630.6570 0.5258 0.2570 0.3183 232.1732 0.9689
2640.4916 0.6562 0.3351 0.2652 232.7483 0.9713
2650.5513 0.5241 0.2943 0.2734 242.9324 1.0138
2660.5428 0.6279 0.2854 0.2430 220.5035 0.9202
2670.6963 0.5806 0.2732 0.3194 232.9880 0.9723
2680.3664 0.4032 0.1306 0.1917 264.5946 1.1042
2690.6383 0.5060 0.3105 0.2282 277.2229 1.1569
2700.5920 0.4225 0.2685 0.1743 268.5005 1.1205
2710.5524 0.6838 0.1923 0.2678 221.7495 0.9254
2720.5877 0.6777 0.3620 0.2749 232.0774 0.9685
2730.5591 0.5969 0.3317 0.3499 247.5812 1.0332
2740.5761 0.7042 0.2751 0.3200 229.1300 0.9562
2750.6032 0.5553 0.3448 0.3193 254.0511 1.0602
2760.4332 0.5580 0.1189 0.1600 246.5747 1.0290
2770.5851 0.5439 0.3834 0.2520 246.9102 1.0304
2780.5531 0.4472 0.2154 0.1032 253.4999 1.0579
2790.5342 0.5928 0.2171 0.2931 232.7963 0.9715
2800.7256 0.6209 0.3090 0.2353 213.4106 0.8906
2810.6115 0.6997 0.2820 0.2711 230.9751 0.9639
2820.6624 0.5737 0.2887 0.2871 240.6800 1.0044
2830.5298 0.6562 0.2728 0.3122 215.4953 0.8993
2840.6034 0.7123 0.2678 0.2319 236.5584 0.9872
2850.6921 0.6675 0.3375 0.2408 225.7273 0.9420
2860.3156 0.4856 0.1573 0.1467 245.1370 1.0230
2870.4477 0.4241 0.1581 0.2325 262.8453 1.0969
2880.6302 0.5184 0.2606 0.2911 232.1253 0.9687
2890.4248 0.4548 0.1709 0.2443 264.1393 1.1023
2900.6999 0.5557 0.3291 0.2522 241.3749 1.0073
2910.5532 0.6686 0.2389 0.2439 238.5233 0.9954
2920.5787 0.6172 0.3780 0.2663 233.8027 0.9757
2930.4720 0.2747 0.1485 0.1831 271.3760 1.1325
2940.6224 0.5788 0.2692 0.2930 207.7794 0.8671
2950.6550 0.5699 0.2059 0.3384 243.5555 1.0164
2960.6480 0.5499 0.2803 0.3288 230.5678 0.9622
2970.5599 0.4991 0.2561 0.2912 256.5911 1.0708
2980.6731 0.6333 0.3354 0.2925 235.6478 0.9834
2990.3755 0.2417 0.1956 0.1674 270.7530 1.1299
3000.5025 0.4791 0.3316 0.3000 241.9979 1.0099
3010.5677 0.6050 0.2781 0.3094 216.5976 0.9039
3020.4587 0.4341 0.2580 0.1742 258.1487 1.0773
3030.3457 0.3740 0.1712 0.2576 255.2732 1.0653
3040.6665 0.8054 0.2203 0.2670 236.5824 0.9873
3050.6628 0.5363 0.3054 0.2917 243.1002 1.0145
3060.6062 0.5330 0.2176 0.2317 234.0184 0.9766
3070.4294 0.3416 0.1570 0.2334 271.5437 1.1332
3080.5176 0.5744 0.2110 0.2575 258.1007 1.0771
3090.6540 0.5509 0.3046 0.2460 227.0932 0.9477
3100.6138 0.7034 0.2603 0.2930 235.7916 0.9840
3110.4978 0.4038 0.2509 0.1538 264.5467 1.1040
3120.5630 0.5215 0.2125 0.1738 242.3813 1.0115
3130.5499 0.5871 0.2492 0.2572 243.2919 1.0153
3140.5487 0.6291 0.2519 0.2663 236.5344 0.9871
3150.5132 0.3572 0.2371 0.1984 246.6946 1.0295
3160.6741 0.7068 0.3360 0.2874 213.4824 0.8909
3170.5613 0.6079 0.2294 0.2608 227.7162 0.9503
3180.6179 0.6208 0.3416 0.2625 231.8138 0.9674
3190.5689 0.4891 0.2527 0.2139 249.4982 1.0412
3200.4901 0.4874 0.1783 0.2603 276.5040 1.1539
3210.4208 0.3983 0.1890 0.2137 265.9125 1.1097
3220.6645 0.7621 0.2107 0.2571 215.5193 0.8994
3230.6451 0.5535 0.3048 0.3276 206.1464 0.8602
3240.4876 0.3694 0.2102 0.1315 288.4638 1.2038
3250.6214 0.6292 0.3237 0.2590 230.1397 0.9601
Table 4. Data of a concrete piston at different life prediction points.
Table 4. Data of a concrete piston at different life prediction points.
05%10%15%85%90%95%100%
M 0 012.6225.2537.87214.60227.22239.85252.47
M a 252.47239.85227.22214.6037.8725.2512.620
α 11.00211.00821.00891.04791.05961.07781.1026
M r 239.63227.51216.34203.8936.5026.6918.4111.74
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Tan, Y.; Ge, B.; Zhao, H.; Lu, X. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of the Concrete Piston Based on Probability Statistics and Data Driven. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8482. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188482

AMA Style

Li J, Tan Y, Ge B, Zhao H, Lu X. Remaining Useful Life Prediction of the Concrete Piston Based on Probability Statistics and Data Driven. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(18):8482. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jie, Yuejin Tan, Bingfeng Ge, Hua Zhao, and Xin Lu. 2021. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of the Concrete Piston Based on Probability Statistics and Data Driven" Applied Sciences 11, no. 18: 8482. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188482

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop