Next Article in Journal
Nonlinear Dynamic Response of a Precast Concrete Building to Sudden Column Removal
Next Article in Special Issue
Radiation Effects on Pure-Silica Multimode Optical Fibers in the Visible and Near-Infrared Domains: Influence of OH Groups
Previous Article in Journal
Fructans with Varying Degree of Polymerization Enhance the Selective Growth of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in the Human Gut Microbiome In Vitro
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Thermal Stability of Type II Modifications Inscribed by Femtosecond Laser in a Fiber Drawn from a 3D Printed Preform

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 600; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020600
by Yitao Wang 1, Shuen Wei 2,*, Maxime Cavillon 1, Benjamin Sapaly 1, Bertrand Poumellec 1, Gang-Ding Peng 2, John Canning 3 and Matthieu Lancry 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 600; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020600
Submission received: 23 November 2020 / Revised: 5 January 2021 / Accepted: 6 January 2021 / Published: 9 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silica-Based Optical Fibers Technologies)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors study the photosensitivity of a 3D printed silica fiber with a 1030nm 240fs laser.  They can show that 3D printed fibers demonstrate similar (or better) thermal stability than commercial single-mode fibers. I am impressed about this paper because it shows that with a relatively simple 3D print they can open a new field for design high-temperature components suitable for a huge variety optical elements. I can technically understand that the section of the fabrication of the resin used for 3D print is relatively short. It would be a help for other groups who want to verify the findings of the authors to be more precise in this section. In any case I highly recommend this paper for publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is well written and the results and discussion are clearly shown. I have a few comments/questions to include in the discussion:

  1. Can you improve the contrast in the inset of Figure 1?  The core is hardly visible.
  2. Please, explain how the SEM images in Figure 3 have been performed, i.e, is the sample cut/prepared somehow? Has been applied some etching process to make the nanogratings visible?
  3. Have you performed EDX measurements after the laser irradiation? Is there any change in the composition of the irradiated region?
  4. Have you performed SEM measurements of the nanogratings after the annealing? Is there any change in the microstructure after the annealing process?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop