1. Introduction
Radiation detectors are used in a variety of areas, including health, industry, and science. Ionizing radiation (X-and γ-ray) exposure may occur in these settings; therefore, proper radiation detection is critical for protecting the environment. The type of dosimeter used for a given application is determined by the energy range. Metal oxides are a well-known kind of substance utilized in dosimetry. It is concerned with the creation of particular structural flaws termed color centers as a result of radiation [
1]. Metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) might combine dose data and give an instant dose reading [
2]. Because of its insensitivity to environmental conditions such as temperature and light, and even its flexibility extended gate, the extended-gate field-effect transistor (EGFET) structure has garnered greater attention in packaging and contact resistance. Furthermore, EGFETs may be utilized without exposing the metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) to irradiation, allowing it to be reused several times [
3]. The EGFET design allows the MOSFET to be isolated from its biological or chemical surroundings. A sensing membrane is connected to the end of a signal line, which is connected to the MOSFET. Furthermore, by allowing the use of larger samples without being limited by the size of the MOSFET, this design gives a wider detection area [
4]. Ionizing radiation dosimetry with irradiation sensor MOSFETs is dependent on translating the threshold voltage shift V
TH into the absorbed dose D. This transition is caused by radiation-induced electron-hole pairs in the transistor’s gate oxide layer, which leads to a rise in the density of interface traps and the accumulation of positive trapped charge. Extended gate field effect transistors (EGFETs) have adjustable sensitivity, rendering them ideal for a wide range of applications. Sensitivity, for example, can be adjusted by varying the thickness of the gate oxide layer [
5,
6]. Instead, transistors can be stacked in specific circumstances [
7,
8]. The sensitivity could also be adjusted by providing a positive bias to the gate while it is being irradiated [
9]. Electric charges are produced and trapped inside the gate oxide layer (Qox,i) or even at the oxide-silicon interface (Qit,i) when a MOSFET is exposed to photons. When Qox,i is positive, the transfer characteristics I
d (drain current) against V
g (gate voltage) change towards negative voltages. The interface charges Qjt,i mostly contribute to the deterioration of the carriers mobility p inside the channel, reducing the slope of the linear component of the characteristics [
10].
The threshold voltage V
TH is defined as the point at which the linear component of the curve intersects the V
g axis and is provided by:
Where V
TH0 is the pre-irradiation value of the V
TH and Cox is the capacitance of the gate. The measurement of the change ∆VTH of the threshold voltage after radiation allows the evaluation of the absorbed dose. Whenever the surface potential Ψ
s is equal to Fermi’s potential Ψ
F and Fermi’s level lies in the center of the semiconductor’s energy gap, interface traps are neutral (overall charge equals zero), regardless of the dispersion throughout the semiconductor energy gap. The charge of FT simply causes the shift between two subthreshold properties toward this VG-axis, and the gate voltage that correlates to such surface potentials is designated as V
MG (midgap voltage) and might even be calculated as the ordinate of the (V
MG, I
MG) point at subthreshold features [
11]. The V
MG, i.e., V
G which correlates to I
D = I
MG, may be determined as V
MG= [log (I
MG-n)/m] using the formula log (I
D) = m.V
G + n derived by the linear curve of subthreshold characteristic. V
MG0 and V
MG are discovered using this method. The straight lines generated by the linear fittings of subthreshold properties are gradually applied to the appropriate midgap current I
MG.
∆V
ft is the factor of threshold voltage changes caused by FT, as:
where V
MG0 and V
MG are the midgap voltages in between irradiation. Vst is the component of threshold voltage shift caused by ST.
where V
T0 and V
T are the threshold voltages of transistors before and after irradiation, respectively, and threshold voltage shift is ∆VT = V
T − V
T0. V
T0 and V
T are calculated from the saturation transfer characteristics as the junction of the V
G-axis and the extrapolation linear area of the curves √I
D = ƒV
G. [
12]. Optical thin films have been the focus of conducting film research. Because of its advantages, such as economic feasibility and nontoxicity, ZnO thin films have indeed been employed in a variety of applications [
13,
14]. According to reports, ZnO has (i) better quantum efficiency, (ii) great photochemical characteristics, and (iii) the capacity to produce a high-quality single crystal at a low price [
15]. It is also a low-cost luminous and biofriendly oxide semiconductor device. Appropriately, ZnO is predicted to find widespread use in UV laser, biosensing, bio-imaging, drug development, and other fields. Doping substances with ZnO, such as lead (Pb), offers benefits. They discovered that Pb does have an impact on the size and shape of ZnO [
16]. The inclusion of lead nanoparticles is accountable for the modified electrode’s increased sensor activity. The significant improvement might be attributed to the synergistic impact of both Pb and ZnO nanoparticles [
17]. In this work, ZnO-Pb thin and thick film were synthesised via chemical bath deposition (CBD) and their structural and morphological properties investigated. The samples were applied to use as low and high radiation detector-based EGFET.
2. Materials and Methods
In total, 2.615 g of Zinc Nitrate (Zn (NO3)2, 6H2O) and 1.4 g of hexamethylenetetramine (C6H12N4) were added to 200 mL deionized water to prepare a solution of 50 mM. The solution was then stirred for 1 h at room temperature. 3.31 g of Lead (II) Nitrate Pb (NO3)2 salt was added to the solution and stirred continuously. A ZnO seed layer on glass substrates were immersed upside down to the solution, then covered and kept in a chemical bath deposition for 8 h at 90 °C. The thin film was then removed, washed with deionized water, and dried in air. These steps were repeated three times to increase the thickness of the films. The film thickness was then measured by FESEM, and it was found that the thickness reached 46 µm. The solution was filtered and dried using an oven at 80 °C for 15 min, then pressed with a hydraulic press to 1 mm thickness.
XRD was used to study the structural properties and the particle size for both films was calculated using Scherer’s formula, as mentioned in [
18]:
where
B is the crystalline XRD peak’s entire width at half maximum,
θβ is the Bragg’s angle, and
λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.154 nm). FESEM was also used to study the morphological properties of the samples and then the Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) model was used to determine the fractional weight of each element in a combination. Since the sample is a mixture of elements, effective atomic number (Z
eff) of the mixture was obtained using Equation (5) [
19]:
where, f = the weight fractions for every component in the medium of interest in relation to the total number of electrons consumed within the compound/mixture that forms the medium. Z denotes the atomic number of every element included in the medium. The value used for actual practical applications is generally 2.94 [
19]. Silver electrodes were deposited as fingerprint interdigitated on the samples, and silver paste was used to connect the wires. The samples were then connected as an extended gate to the MOSFET to study the I-V characterization under a low absorbed dose (9, 36 and 70 mGy) using the X-ray machine at the School of Physics, USM, and high absorbed dose (1, 5 and 10 Gy) using a radiotherapy machine (Elekta) at Gleneagles Hospital, Penang, Malaysia.
MOSFET is connected to the semiconductor thick film through the gate to keep the first device away from radiation. Radiation interacts directly with semiconductors, which leads to changes in their properties, such as increase in the amount of current that reaches the MOSFET. The current increases as the amount of radiation dose increases. The EGFET connection setup is mentioned in [
18]. The sensing component (ZnO-Pb) and a commercialized MOSFET (CD4007UB) are the two primary components of an EGFET.
Figure 1 depicts the ZnO-Pb-based EGFET X-ray detector. The sensing portion of the sensor was linked to a gate of the MOSFET. The sensing layer was exposed to an X-ray source before being attached to the measuring equipment. The dosimeter’s reaction was examined using a Keithley 2400 and Lab Tracer 2 software. The connection used in this work is mentioned in [
18].
The film’s sensitivity was measured in terms of the threshold voltage (V
TH), which was determined using Equation (1) [
20]. The detection sensitivity of the samples to X-ray exposure was determined using the formula below:
where
S denotes sensitivity and D indicates the absorbed dose.
3. Results and Discussion
Properties of the thin films and disks:
Figure 2 shows the FESEM images for the morphology of ZnO-Pb thin films deposited on glass substrates and for disks prepared by using CBD. The thin film’s morphology consists of hexagonal crystal formations that are perfectly aligned and tightly packed nanorods. This result agrees with a previous work [
21]. The fractional atomic percentage of the ZnO-Pb thin film was determined by using the (EDX) technique.
Figure 2A also shows the EDX results of the ZnO-Pb thin film.
Figure 2B presents that in the FESEM micrographs of the ZnO-Pb disk type images, the ZnO-Pb grains appeared as a homogeneous nanorod shape. The same figure also shows the fractional atomic percentage of an investigated ZnO-Pb disk type obtained via EDX procedures. Equation (5) was used to determine the Zeff of the studied samples, which was found to be 72.5.
Figure 3A represents the crystalline peaks of ZnO-Pb for thin films. The diffraction peaks observed at diffraction angles 2θ of 31.37° and 36.22° correspond to (100) and (101) plans of the ZnO-Pb thin film. The amorphous nature of the thin film pattern is due to the lack of thin film thickness. On the other hand,
Figure 3B shows the diffraction peaks of the disk type powder at angles 2θ of 31.66°, 34.34°, 36.16°, 47.46°, 56.45°, and 62.71° corresponding to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), and (103) plans of ZnO-Pb disk, respectively. The essential characteristics of the diffraction patterns are identical, but the relative strength of the diffraction peaks rises as the film thickness increases [
22]. The average crystal size of the nanostructured ZnO-Pb, as calculated from the Scherrer formula Equation (4), is shown in
Table 1 As shown in
Figure 1, the ZnO-Pb thin film (TF) and disk type (1 mm) were selected as EGFETs and applied as radiation sensors. The radiation sensitivity of the membranes was tested using various radiation doses (9, 36.5, and 70 mGy). As illustrated in
Figure 4A,B, the results of these measurements were converted into I-V curves in both linear and saturation regimes (B). The linear regime was reached with a steady drain-to-source voltage (V
ds) of 0.3 V and the saturation regime with a fixed gate-to-source voltage (V
gs) of 3 V. The linear regime curves show a shift of the threshold voltage to the left by increasing the absorbed dose, while the saturation regime curves show the current increased by increasing the doses of radiation up to 70 mGy for the low absorbed dose. This increasing of the current in the saturation regime can be due to electron–hole pairs being formed during irradiation, resulting in higher electrical properties such as current [
23]. The effect of the absorbed dose led to increment of the current; these modifications are greatly influenced by the internal composition of the ingested chemicals. The interaction process of X-rays with substances is essentially based on electronic excitation, electronic ionization, and atomic movement of outer electrons [
24].
The ZnO-Pb thin film showed an increment in optical density up to the current level, less than 1.2 × 10
−3 A under absorbed dose 70 mGy, whereas thicker films 1 mm ZnO-Pb sustained higher level of current 1.4 × 10
−3 A with a standard error varied from 3.4 × 10
−4 A for thin film to 8.546 × 10
−4 A for 1 mm thickness under the same absorbed dose and revealed detectable changes in its electrical characteristics. This is due to the fact that the deterioration is more severe with greater dosage and thinner films [
25]. The change in the current ΔI for the thin film was found to be 85 μA; this amount increased for 1 mm thickness to reach 172 μA. Also, from the graphs, we can notice that the 1 mm ZnO-Pb disk responded to radiation more than the thin film because of the presence of Pb, which has a high Z
eff under low radiation dose, which interacts with radiation through the photoelectric effect and produces more photons, leading to increase in the current [
26]. The current and voltage sensitivity values of TF and 1 mm ZnO-Pb were calculated by plotting (I–Dose value) and (V-Dose value) curves, as mentioned in
Figure 5. The voltage of the system was found to be decreased by increasing the absorbed dose from 3.13 V to 2.90 V, within standard error ±0.0118 V for the thin film and from 3.57 V to 3.06 V ± 0.03 V for the 1 mm disk type. The linearity of the sensors was shown to be 94.5% for the thin film and 96.5% for the 1 mm ZnO-Pb. In addition, small thicknesses are more sensitive to low radiation doses than high radiation dose [
27]. The threshold voltage of the ZnO-Pb samples was calculated by using Equation (1); it shows that for all samples, the threshold voltage rose by increasing the absorbed dose value and increasing the thickness of the samples (
Figure 6). According to the graphs, increase in the thickness of ZnO-Pb from several μm to 1 mm leads to a noticeable magnification in the ∆V
TH from 0.06 to 0.1 V for the thin film, and from 0.21 to 0.45 V for the 1 mm disk. Furthermore, as the sample thickness rises, so does the sensitivity of the dosimeter from 1.42 mV/mGy for the thin film to 6.42 mV/mGy for the 1 mm disk under radiation dose 70 mGy. Because the thick gate allows for more effective separation of electron-hole pairs produced within the oxide, the sensitivity will improve [
28]. The sensitivity of the samples was measured using Equation (6); the sensitivity of the samples decreased on increasing the dose and increased with a rise in thickness of the devices. The characteristic results of the ZnO-Pb thin film and disk type are tabulated in
Table 2. One feature of the EGFET sensor that is observed with every detector is the inherent reduction in sensitivity with increased absorbed dose. This is thought to be produced by changes in the effective electric field supplied to the EGFET during irradiation, which results in a buildup of holes at the gate oxide contact [
29].
Current-voltage curves were plotted as shown in
Figure 7A,B. The figures describe the radiation sensing characteristics of the ZnO-Pb thin film and the 1 mm disk type under high absorbed doses (1, 5, and 10 Gy). These curves reflect a higher current value, compared to the same previous dosimeters exposed to low radiation doses. Moreover, the current value increased more in the sample 1 mm ZnO-Pb disk type than in the thin film. This is because ionizing radiation produces structural flaws (called color centers), which cause their density to vary as X-ray exposure increases [
30]. High-energy radiations alter the physical characteristics of the materials through which they pass. The existence of oxygen vacancies influences the reactivity of oxide materials [
31]. Moreover, the current value increased more in the sample 1 mm ZnO-Pb disk type than that in the thin film—∆I for the thin film = 73 μA and 1 mm = 189 μA. Oxygen vacancies are present naturally in all oxides as Shottky or Frenkel faults, and their density can be raised or decreased in a variety of methods [
32]. In the former scenario, the vacancy relates to two electrons. Increasing the radiation dose leads to rise in the defects.
From the above curves, the slopes of the (I
ds-Dose value) and (V
gs-Dose value) were used to calculate the present sensitivity and linearity of the detector to radiation (
Figure 8): 5.80 μA/Gy ± 0.545 μA, 90.4% for the thin film and 21.5 μA/Gy ± 0.14 μA, 96.8% for 1 mm ZnO-Pb, for saturation and linear regimes, respectively. Also, the current rose on increasing the dose in the saturation regime, while the voltage decreases with a rise in the dose in the linear regime from 3.22 V to 2.94 V ± 0.028 V for the thin film and from 3.28 V to 3.04 V ± 0.02 V for the 1 mm thickness one. The threshold voltage of the samples shows that for all samples, the threshold voltage increased on increasing the absorbed dose value and increasing the thickness of the samples. Because the possibility of particle ionization by photoelectric effect is considerably greater than that by Compton’s effect, a greater number of positive trap charge is created during low dose X-ray irradiation than during high dose X-ray irradiation, which obviously impacts the variety of values in the predominance of Compton interaction, as in this case [
26].
The sensitivity of the samples decreased on increasing the absorbed dose and increases on increasing the thickness of the samples.
Figure 9 shows the threshold voltage and sensitivity plotting for all samples with absorbed dose value. We can notice that 1 mm ZnO-Pb has higher ∆V
TH value and sensitivity than the other sample with lower thicknesses. The sensitivity of an MOS sensor is greatly dependent on the thickness of gate oxide (T
OX). The oxide functions as an ionization chamber, where T
OX defines the ionization volume. In addition, as the thickness increases, the capacity of the oxide (C
OX) decreases, so that at the same trapped load, the variation in the gate voltage is higher. The sensitivity of MOS dosimeters increases on the one hand with increasing ionization volume, and on the other with decreasing oxide capacity, then increases in T
OX, twice leading to increases in sensitivity. Therefore, the sensitivity has a dependence approximately proportional to T
OX [
33]. On the other hand, increasing the absorbed dose up to 10 Gy led to a drop in the sensitivity value for all the samples. This reduction in sensitivity with the applied dose is generated by changes in the functional electric field delivered to the EGFET throughout irradiations, which produces an accumulation of holes just at the oxide gate interface [
34].
Table 3 summarizes the results of irradiation to a high X-ray dose.