Next Article in Journal
Effect of Coronavirus-19 Restrictions in Male Handball Players: Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Satisfaction with Life
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Modeling of Passive and Active Cooling Methods to Improve PV Panels Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plant Species Classification and Diversity of the Understory Vegetation in Oak Forests of Swat, Pakistan

1
Department of Botany, University of Malakand, Chakdara Dir Lower 18800, KP, Pakistan
2
School of General Education, College of the North Atlantic Qatar, Arab League Street, Doha 24449, Qatar
3
Department of Botany, Hazara University, Mansehra 21300, KP, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11372; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311372
Submission received: 2 October 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 26 November 2021 / Published: 1 December 2021

Abstract

:
The forest ecosystem has understory vegetation that plays a vital role in sustaining diversity, providing nutrients, and forming a useful association for developing a balanced ecosystem. The current study provides detailed insights into the plant biodiversity and species classification of the understory vegetation of Swat, Pakistan. The floral diversity of the area was comprised of 58 plant species belonging to 32 families. The physiognomy of the studied area was dominated by herbaceous growth form with 47 species. The dominant life-form class was hemicryptophytes with 19 species (33%), followed by nanophanerophytes with 15 species (26%) and therophytes with 13 species (22%). Of the 58 species, 43 plant species were associated with group III clustered by applying Ward’s agglomerative clustering that indicated wide sociability of the species in the studied oak-dominated forests. Group III had higher species richness (10.3), α-diversity (2.74) and β-diversity (9.85), and Margalef index values (3.95). While the group I had maximum Pielous and Simpson index values of 0.97 and 7.13, respectively. Redundancy analysis revealed that seven variables (i.e., latitude, elevation, clay, wilting point, bulk density, saturation, and electric conductivity) were significantly influential concerning the understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests. The understory vegetation of these forests plays an important role in the forest ecosystem of the region. The present study reveals floral divergence and physiognomic scenario of the unexplored study area, which could be an important reference for future ethnobotanical, phytosociological, and conservational endeavors. Moreover, this information is important to the success of efforts intended to prevent the loss of species diversity in these forests by destroying their natural habitats.

1. Introduction

The most useful source of botanical information of a particular area is its floristic checklists [1,2]. Since floristic composition is a decent floristic marker, any changing floristic composition in various endogenous milieus highlights the presence of various environmental variables, prompting entomb and intra-particular variations [3]. The floristic structure of a specific territory provides fundamental. However, information about the plant dissemination and motherland show diversity in landscapes, topographies, and biological/ecological zones, bolstering the distinctive floristic composition [4]. To contemplate the vegetation of a territory, it is essential to oversee the plant’s life-form, which is an indicator for both micro- and macroclimate [5]. As indicated by Raunkiaer [6], the biological spectrum is divided into five major classes (i.e., phanerophytes, hemicryptophytes, cryptophytes, chamaephytes, and therophytes).
The plant species are also categorized based on leaf size classes which are also extremely helpful for association mapping of vegetation; it may also be helpful for comprehension of the plant communities and their physiological processes [7,8]. Leaf sizes and shapes (physiognomy) connect unequivocally with moisture and temperature from worldwide to neighborhood scales [9]. Leaf characteristics assume an especially imperative part in carbon absorption, water relations, and vitality adjust (energy balance) [9]. Furthermore, a life-form and leaf size spectra provide a clear picture of an area. Therefore, climatic conditions of a certain region may accurately be referred from such observations [10]. These physiognomic characters have been widely used in vegetation investigations in anthropogenic and naturally vulnerable areas [5,10].
The understory vegetation plays a major role in sustaining the structure and function of forest ecosystems [11,12], promoting energy transfer and nitrogen cycles, and shaping the canopy succession of forest ecosystems [13,14]. The understory makes comparatively little contribution to the overall biomass of forest plants [13,15]; it promotes the greatest proportion in floristic diversity [16]. In addition, diversified understory vegetation boosts the structural complexity of forests and provides other biotic groups with habitats and food, increasing their diversity [17]. For forest regeneration, understory vegetation is extremely crucial, as it can influence the germination, survival, and development of tree seedlings by competing for light, water, and nutrients [11,15,18]. Therefore, increasing attention is being paid to forest understory vegetation [16]. It is essential to know about the most influential variables affecting their distribution for ecological protection, conservation, and forest management [12,16,19].
Numerous studies have shown the effect on the species composition and diversity of understory flora. These include flora canopy species and structure [20], stand management [21], soil disturbances [22], light resources [23], litter properties [20,24], and soil nutrients and pH [23,25]. Topography can dramatically change microclimates and the availability of energy under the tree canopy [23,26] and, in turn, affect the composition and diversity of understory species [12,27]. In coniferous forests, hardwood forests, and mixed-wood forests, understory vegetation has been well studied [25,28]. The latter two types of forests are generally agreed to create more favorable conditions for their biodiversity conservation and restoration than coniferous forests [21]. In general, broad-leaved evergreen forest and oak forest have been ignored in understory vegetation and its composition. Beg and Mirza [29] studied oak-dominated forests in the Hindukush-mountain region. In the study, four oak species have been reported from the region, i.e., Quercus lanata Sm., Quercus robur L., Quercus baloot Griff., and Quercus semecarpifolia Sm. The research work also reported thirty-six understory species in the oak-dominated forest. So far, no comprehensive study has investigated the details of phytosociological attributes and environmental variables in association with those understories, aiming to understand its diversity. Forest ecosystems’ floristic composition, geographic distribution, and ecological conditions are essential for a rational management plan. In this study, the understory species composition is considered to differ significantly among the major groups concerning species richness and diversity. Additionally, attempts were made to determine the extent to which physiographic and edaphic variables could explain variation in the understory species composition and major distinct groups of oak-dominated forests.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Swat district is located in northwest of Pakistan in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province (Figure 1). It is a well-known summer resort in the country for national and international tourists and visitors. It lies between 34°0′34″ and 35°0′55″ north latitudes and 72°0′08″ and 72°0′50″ east longitudes. The total area of the district is 5337 Km2. Most of the area consists of mountainous regions belonging to the Hinduraj series of Hindukush mountains. The climate of Swat is relatively warm in the lower parts but cooler and refreshing in the upper parts of the Valley. Summers are short and moderate, temperatures seldom rise above 37 °C. Annual rainfall ranges from 800 to 900 mm, and snowfall during winter is the constant feature of upper Swat [30].

2.2. Field Investigation

Extensive field surveys were carried out during the flowering and fruiting stages. Timings for the fieldwork were carefully selected according to the plant’s growth phases and collection season. A handheld (Garmin manufactured in Germany) Geographical Positioning System (GPS) recorded the study area coordinates. A total of 300 plots having an area of 20 m × 20 m were established in thirty stands (10 plots/stand) of the oak forest at an elevation ranging from 1000 to 2900 m. The understory vegetation is defined as shrubs and herbaceous plants growing on the forest floor. Each 20 m × 20 m plot was divided into four 10 m × 10 m quadrats, three of which were chosen at random to survey shrub species. Five 1 m × 1 m quadrats, one in the middle and four at the corners of the 20 m × 20 m plot, were used to study herbaceous plants. Phytosociological parameters, i.e., height and density, with the percent cover’s visual calculations, were measured [31,32]. The life-form classes and leaf spectra of all plant species were determined and classified according to Raunkiaer [7]. Plants reported and collected were identified by expert plant taxonomists and were then rechecked with the Royal Botanical Garden Kew online web (http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ accessed on 14 November 2021) and the Flora of Pakistan [33,34]. The Herbarium specimens were submitted to the Department of Botany, University of Malakand.

2.3. Soil Analysis

A stainless-steel cylindrical soil sampler with a diameter of 5 cm was used to collect five topsoil samples (0–10 cm depth) at random sites from each plot. The samples were then carefully combined to create a composite sample for analysis. The hybrid soil samples were air-dried and sieved to 0.2 mm for soil organic carbon (SOC), and total nitrogen (TN) tests and 2 mm for soil pH tests prior to analysis. The updated Mebius approach was used to examine SOC [35]. The Kjeldahl procedure was used to evaluate TN [36]. In a 1:2.5 soil to water suspension, the pH of the soil was determined [37]. The volumetric ring procedure was used to determine the bulk density of the soil [38]. Soil textural properties were determined using Bouyoucos hydrometer [39], while electrical conductivity was calculated using a conductometer (Model CON 5). Important nutrients like potassium, phosphorus, and lime were determined by following standard procedures adopted by [38].

2.4. Data Analysis

The relative important value (IV) and importance value index (IVI) of each species in the understory plant community was calculated as follows:
IV (x) = F3 (x) + D3 (x) + C3 (x)
IVI   ( x ) = IV   ( x ) 300 × 100
where F3 (x), relative frequency; D3 (x), relative density; and C3 (x), relative cover.
IVI (x) represents the computed importance value index of understory species and seedling sapling of tree species, while IV (x) represents the computed importance value of the associated understory species. The species richness and α-diversity (Shannon index, H; Evenness index, E; Margalef’s index, M and Simpson’s index, 1/D) were used to describe plot diversity and β-diversity for changes in community structure across sites within contrasting forest types.
H = i = 1 S p i   In p i
E = H InS
M = S − 1/In N
1/D = 1/Σ (pi2)
β = St/a
where pi = proportion of the species (i) to total number of species, In = natural logarithm, S = species richness, N = total number of species, St = number of species in all plots, and a = total number of plots
Ward’s agglomerative cluster analysis was used for classification of the understory vegetation stands as the species distribution varies across the elevation gradient; therefore, cluster analysis was preferred in comparison with other technique available in Pc-ord version 6 in which Euclidean distance was opted for measuring distance using Ward’s linkage method [40]. Redundancy analysis (RDA) evaluated the effects of different environmental and understory parameters using PC-ord version 6. The suitability of RDA analysis was assessed by using published literature in which first DCA-ordination was performed [41] to elucidate whether unimodal [42,43] or linear [44] response curve should be used in ordination analysis. The gradient length on DCA-axes 1 was 12, which is more than 4.1, and therefore the use of Canonical Correspondence analysis (CCA) or RDA was tested. In the choice between CCA and RDA-ordination, we prefer the RDA as the % age variance was (30%) and stands distribution was uniform in biplot compared to CCA ordination having variance of 19%. Ms-Excel 2010 was used for data tabulation and graphic presentation, while SPSS version 22 was used for statistical analysis. The significance of the variables was tested at p < 0.05. In addition, post hoc honestly significant differences (HSD) test was used for variation between the groups.

3. Results

3.1. Understory Species Composition

A total number of 58 understory plant species belonging to 32 families was identified at 30 different locations in the Hindukush ranges of Swat. The physiognomy was dominated by herbaceous growth form with 47 plant species (81%), followed by shrubs with 10 (17%), and trees with a single plant species (2%). Herbaceous dominancy may be due to altitudinal and geographical variations, indicating the herbaceous flora’s climatic factors. Among the families, Fabaceae was the leading family with eight plant species, followed by Asteraceae and Lamiaceae with seven species each. Further, seven families (i.e., Amaranthaceae, Malvaceae, Poaceae, Plantaginaceae, Polygonaceae, Pteridaceae, and Rosaceae) were recorded with two plant species each. The remaining 22 families are represented by individual species (Table 1).
The present study identified seven different life-form classes in the study area (Figure 2). The most dominant life-form was hemicryptophytes with 19 species (33%), followed by nanophanerophytes with 15 species (26%), therophytes with 13 species (22%), and geophytes with 7 species (12%)., Two species of chamaephytes (3%) and one species (2%) of nanophanerophytes and liana were also recorded (Table 1).

3.2. Leaf Size Spectra

Results of leaf size spectra trait revealed that species with microphyllous leaves dominated the area with 24 species (41%) followed by nanophyll 17 species (29%), leptophyll 11 species (19%), and mesophyll 5 species (9%) (Figure 3). Single species (2%) with megaphyllous leaf size was also recorded. A high rate of microphylls may be identified within the cool environment of the sub-elevated and snowcapped areas. Here, the top layer was less settled; it contained a slim sheet that may deny them the entrance of roots. The microphyllous and nanophyllous leaves species were inexhaustible because of the biological variety for this dry condition.
The chorotype of the species varies from uniregional to cosmopolitan, i.e., 22% were cosmopolitan, 26% pluriregional, 23% bioregional, and 29% were uniregional.

3.3. Understory Classification

A total of 58 plant species were recorded as associates in the understory vegetation and clustered into three major groups by applying Ward’s agglomerative clustering (Figure 4 and Table 2). Among 58 species, 43 plant species were found in association with group III, clearly indicating the species’ wide sociability in the studied oak-dominated forests. Moreover, the analysis reveals that IVI of Berberis lycium Royle (7.82), Convolvulus arvensis L. (6.87), and Asplenium trichomanes L. (6.6) were the most abundant species in group III. Group II was recorded intermediately diverse in understory species having 25 plant species with Calamintha vulgaris (L.) H. Karst., Dryopteris stewartii Fraser-Jenk., and Plantago lanceolata L. as the dominant associates having IVI of 11.5, 9.34, and 9.86, respectively. The results revealed group I as the less diverse in terms of species (18 species) and B. lycium having IVI of 9.86, A. trichomanes (9.14), and Indigofera heterantha Wall. ex Brandis. (8.93) were the most abundant species.

3.4. Understory Species Diversity and Richness

Significant differences in species richness (p < 0.015), Shannon–Wiener, Margalef (p < 0.00076), Simpson (p < 0.040) and Beta indexes were detected among three major groups of the understory layer of oak-dominated forests (Table 3). Nonetheless, Pielous evenness was found non-significantly different (p > 0.05) among the three major groups of understory vegetation. Group III had the highest species richness (10.3), α-diversity (2.74), and β-diversity (9.85) and the highest value of Margalef index (3.95). On the contrary, the group I had the highest Pielous and Simpson index values with 0.97 and 7.13, respectively (Table 3).

3.5. Influence of Physiographic and Edaphic Variables on the Understory Species Composition

In the ordination analysis, the permutation test revealed that the eigenvalues for the first axis and those for all canonical axes were significant (p < 0.01) and indicated that understory species composition was influenced by physiographic and edaphic variables (Figure 5). All three axes explained 65% of the cumulative variance and 30.8% of the variance in the relationship among understory species composition (Table 4). Forward selection of the RDA ordination revealed that seven variables (i.e., latitude, elevation, clay, wilting point, bulk density, saturation, and electric conductivity) were the significant influential among all 23 variables in relation to the understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests (Table 5). Group I (Quercus balootPinus roxburghii community), which lies at an intermediate elevation among the three communities, has lower quantities of organic matter, Lime, Nitrogen and Potassium. In contrast, group II (Quercus semecarpifoliaQuercus rubur), which lies at a higher elevation, has higher quantities of these nutrients. Moreover, in the ordination axes summery, the first axis was significantly associated with total importance value index (r = 0.639), potassium (r = 0.363), and elevation (r = 0.239). The second axis was found in close relation with QIVI (r = −0.414), wilting point (r = −0.374), and clay (r = −0.369). While the third axis was found in close correlation with silt (r = 0.381), lime (r = 0.395), and available water (r = −0.377) (Table 6).

4. Discussion

Vegetation is a group of plants growing together in a particular locality [43], and it may also be defined as a unit that retains its unique structure and physiognomic characteristics in an adequately great and sufficient way to permit their distinction from other units [46]. The understory plant species in the oak-dominated forests consist of 58 species belonging to 32 families at 30 different locations in the Hindukush ranges of Swat. The physiognomy of the studied area was dominated by herbaceous growth form with 47 plant species (81%), followed by shrubs with 10 plant species (17%), and trees with individual plant species (2%). Herbaceous dominancy and less tree percentage might be due to altitudinal and geographical variations, which indicates that the climatic factors favor the herbaceous flora. Our findings are associated with researchers in allied, neighboring, and national regions in which the species reported were mostly herbaceous [47,48]. Among all families, Fabaceae was recorded as the leading family with eight plant species, followed by Asteraceae and Lamiaceae with seven species each. For instance, several researchers [5,32,33,34,38,46], for instance [31], have documented Asteraceae and Fabaceae as the two most important families. While other researchers [38] cited Lamiaceae and Rosaceae, and [48] cited Lamiaceae, Moraceae, and Asteraceae, as dominant plant families from Darra Adam Khel, KP, Pakistan.
Plant life-forms and vegetation are indicators of the climate [6]. According to Meher-Homji [49], life-forms are reflective of the bioclimates of an area. Raunkiaer [6] designed three major phytoclimates based on life-form spectra on the earth. It includes phanerophytic climate for the tropics, therophytic for the xeric environments, and hemicryptophytic for the cold temperate region. The present study identified seven different life-form classes in the study area. The most dominant life-form was hemicryptophytes with 19 species (33%), followed by nanophanerophytes with 15 species (26%) and therophytes with 13 species (22%). Hemicryptophytes usually prevail in open physiognomies, while phanerophytes are mainly in closed ones [50,51]. Biological spectra are important in comparing geography and habitats and might change due to biotic influences, viz., grazing, human activities, and climatic changes [52,53,54]. Hemicryptophytes lose their aboveground parts during most summer and winter months while therophytes remain seeded to avoid summer, drought, and cold winter stresses.
Furthermore, the flora of the study area is under anthropogenic pressure in the form of overgrazing and deforestation by nomadic and native people. Nasir and Sultan [55] reported a similar finding from District Chakwal, where therophytes were the dominant biological spectra. A community that therophytes dominate can be a characteristic feature of a highly disturbed area under anthropogenic pressure [48,54]. In addition, [56] reported therophytes as the dominant plant species of the rangeland, district Tank, Pakistan, and [57] assessed that therophytes is the leading life-form of Lahor, District Swabi, Pakistan, showing that the results of the current study are in compliance with the findings of several other studies.
Results of leaf size spectra trait revealed that species with microphyllous leaves dominated the area (with 24 species, 41%), followed by nanophylls (17 species, 29%), leptophylls (11 species, 19%), and mesophyll (5 species, 9%). Nonetheless, 2% with megaphyllous leaf size was also recorded. Microphyllous leaf size class is normally the characteristic feature of meadow plant species, while leptophylls and nanophylls are illustrative of hot deserts [7,54]. Comparable outcomes, where microphylls and nanophylls overwhelmed the vegetation and were reported in the work of researchers [7] and [45], where the authors linked these two leaf size classes with the physiognomies of mild ranges. A high rate of microphylls may be identified with cool atmospheres of the sub-elevated and snowcapped areas. Here, as well, the top layer was less settled, containing a slim sheet that is not conclusive about the entrance of roots. Microphyllous and nanophyllous leaves species were inexhaustible because of the biological variety for this dry condition. The present results concur with [58], who detailed that microphylls and nanophylls predominance in the dry, mild atmosphere of District Quetta. Our inferences additionally uncovered that the high extent in leaf size class changes with increasing altitude, and the rate of microphylls was emphatically connected with this as well [59,60].
Among the 58 species documented, 43 plant species were found in association with group III clustered by applying Ward’s agglomerative clustering, which indicates wide sociability of the species in the studied oak-dominated forests. Moreover, the analysis reveals that B. lycium (7.82), C. arvensis (6.87), and A. trichomanes (6.6) were the most abundant species in group III. Group II was less diverse in terms of understory species numbering in total of 25 plant species. In this group, Calamintha vulgaris (L.) H. Karst., Dryopteris stewartii Fraser-Jenk. and Plantago lanceolata L. were dominant (11.5, 9.34, and 9.86 respectively). Plant species in the understory with varying degrees of resistance to these factors prefer a specific forest type. Since certain plant species are limited to a specific forest type, the extinction of that forest could result in the extinction of certain understory plants [27,61].
According to a recent analysis, the richness and diversity of understory species in oak forests differed greatly depending on canopy dominants. Herbaceous species abundance and α-diversity were highest in the oaks forest, but there was less heterogeneity (β-diversity) across sites and major groups. These findings highlight the importance of oak forests in protecting habitat and plant composition in the understory vegetation. An herb layer with higher species abundance and diversity in oak forests may be due to higher solar radiation on south-facing slopes, which is better for herbaceous species [62,63,64].
Environmental variables such as geographic parameters and physiochemical soil characteristics are important in determining the community structure and composition [65]. In particular, latitude and altitude were found to vary significantly in the understory groups. Clay particles in soil texture and bulk density, saturation point, and electrical conductivity varied significantly in the understory vegetation. Similarly, in the same region [66], the soil parameters in understory vegetation of Pinus wallichiana A.B. Jacks. dominated forest have been studied, revealing that elevation, slope, and phosphorus are vital factors in determining the understory vegetation. An oak species, Q. rubur L., was also reported as a major associated species. Furthermore, many other researchers from other parts of the world have reported that edaphic factors can significantly affect the species composition and species diversity in plant communities [10,66,67,68].
Forward selection of the RDA ordination revealed that latitude, elevation, clay, wilting point, bulk density, saturation, and electric conductivity were significantly influential in determining the understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests. These results follow the findings of many other previous studies [12,59,69,70]. Ali and Begum [62] also investigated the vegetation of Swat and determined congruent results by stating a strong relationship between vegetation and edaphic factors. Many other researchers worldwide have recorded that soil characteristics matter more than canopy organisms in deciding understory vegetation [62,63,64,70]. The study of species composition analysis in the oak-dominated forest revealed a general pattern of variation in the community diversity and species composition. A similar pattern of species composition was also reported by [65] in P. wallachiana understory from the same region. The species diversity was found to increase with time as Beg and Mirza [29] reported only 36 understory species due to the increase in anthropogenic activities.

5. Conclusions

The current study reveals that Swat oak forests have rich floristic diversity with dominance of the therophytic life-form and microphyllous leaf size class, indicating sub-tropical and moist temperate type climates. The species diversity was observed to increase during the spring and summer seasons and decreased later in the autumn. As the winter season approaches, the decline in diversity was observed, associated with dry environmental conditions, slow growth rate, and other climatic factors. Nonetheless, critical impacts of seasonal variation on life-forms and overall species diversity were evident. Among 58 species, 43 plant species were associated with group III clustered by applying Ward’s agglomerative clustering, indicating the wide sociability of the species in the studied oak-dominated forests. The understory vegetation of these forests plays an important role in the forest ecology of the region.
Moreover, the environmental and soil variables, i.e., latitude, elevation, clay percentage, wilting point, electrical conductivity, and potassium (mg/Kg), affect the understory vegetation. In addition, important overstory variables like Quercus IVI and Total IVI of overstory were also found to affect the understory vegetation in oak-dominated forests. Further, it is concluded that the area is vulnerable due to the pressure from the local inhabitants in the form of overgrazing and deforestation, which may significantly affect the understory vegetation. This information is particularly important for the success of efforts intended to prevent the loss of genetic diversity of species within these forests by destroying their natural habitats. Moreover, it is imperative to conserve the area’s biodiversity and provide alternative means of livelihood for the local communities that may allow sustainable utilization and conservation of the invaluable biodiversity of this area for future generations.

Author Contributions

The research work was designed and supervised by N.K. A.R. carried out the field and laboratory work, data analysis, and manuscript writing. R.U. also contributed to manuscript writing and data collection. K.A., D.A.J. and M.E.H.K. provided valuable information and comments on the initial draft and refine the text in addition to language editing and data analysis. I.U.R. provided valuable suggestions during the write-up process and data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was conducted as a Ph.D. project and did not receive support from any funding agency.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data analyzed/generated are included and available in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude towards the Master students enrolled in the Department of Botany and the people of Malakand Division who helped with the fieldwork for this project. We thank Achim Bräuning (Institute of Geography, Department of Geography and Geosciences, Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany) for insightful comments that substantially improved the early version. We also acknowledged the anonymous reviewers and editors of the Applied Sciences journal for their valuable comment and language editing.

Conflicts of Interest

We hereby declare that all the authors have participated in this study and the development of the manuscript. All the authors have read the final version and consent for the article to be published in the Applied Sciences.

References

  1. Musarella, C.M.; Mendoza-Fernández, A.J.; Mota, J.F.; Alessandrini, J.F.M.A.; Bacchetta, G.; Brullo, G.B.S.; Caldarella, O.; Ciaschetti, O.C.G.; Conti, F.; Di Martino, F.C.L.; et al. Checklist of gypsophilous vascular flora in Italy. Phyto Keys 2018, 103, 61–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Perrino, E.V.; Signorile, G. Checklist of the vascular flora from the Monopoli coast (Apulia). Ital. Bot. 2009, 41, 263–279. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shah, M.; Farrukh HSyed NMSImran AHumaira, W. Life Form And Floristic Characteristics Along Altitudinal Gradient Of Humid Temperate Forests Located In Remote Area Of Pakistan. Glob. J. Biodivers. Sci. Manag. 2013, 3, 276–281. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rafaqat, M. An Annotated Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles of Margalla Hills National Park, Pakistan. Pak. J. Zool. 2011, 43, 1041–1048. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shimwell, D.W. Festuco-Brometea Br.-Bl. & R. Tx. 1943 in the British isles: The Phytogeography and Phytosociology of Limestone Grasslands: Part I (A) General Introduction;(B) Xerobromion in England. Vegetatio 1971, 23, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  6. Raunkiaer, C. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography; Being the Collected Papers of C. Raunkiaer. In The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography; Being the Collected Papers of C. Raunkiaer; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1934. [Google Scholar]
  7. Oosting, H.J.; Hess, D.W. Microclimate and a relic stand of Tsuga canadensis in the lower piedmont of North Carolina. Ecology 1956, 37, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bailey, I.W.; Sinnott, E.W. A botanical index of Cretaceous and Tertiary climates. Science 1915, 41, 831–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cain, S.A.; De Oliveira Castro, G.M. Manual of Vegetation Analysis; Haper and Row: New York, NY, USA, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  10. Augusto, L.; Dupouey, J.L.; Ranger, J. Effects of tree species on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests. Ann. For. Sci. 2003, 60, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gracia, M.; Montané, F.; Piqué, J.; Retana, J. Overstory structure and topographic gradients determining diversity and abundance of understory shrub species in temperate forests in central Pyrenees (NE Spain). For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 242, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gilliam, F.S. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 2007, 57, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Messier, C.; Parent, S.; Bergeron, Y. Effects of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests. J. Veg. Sci. 1998, 9, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nilsson, M.C.; Wardle, D.A. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: Evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2005, 3, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bartels, S.F.; Chen, H.Y.H. Is understory plant species diversity driven by resource quantity or resource heterogeneity? Ecology 2010, 91, 1931–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dauber, J.; Hirsch, M.; Simmering, D.; Waldhardt, R.; Otte, A.; Wolters, V. Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: Matrix effects on species richness. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 98, 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Duguid, M.C.; Frey, B.R.; Ellum, D.S.; Kelty, M.; Ashton, M.S. The influence of ground disturbance and gap position on understory plant diversity in upland forests of southern New England. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 303, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koncz, G.; Papp, M.; Török, P.; Kotroczó, Z.; Krakomperger, Z.; Matus, G.; Tóthmérész, B. The role of seed bank in the dynamics of understorey in an oak forest in Hungary. Acta Biol. Hung. 2010, 61, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Barbier, S.; Gosselin, F.; Balandier, P. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—A critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 254, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, M.; Sun, O.J. Effects of forest patch type and site on herb-layer vegetation in a temperate forest ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 300, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Roberts, M.R.; Zhu, L. Early response of the herbaceous layer to harvesting in a mixed coniferous–deciduous forest in New Brunswick, Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 155, 17–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hart, S.A.; Chen, H.Y.H. Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in boreal forest. Ecol. Monogr. 2008, 78, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ellsworth, J.W.; Harrington, R.A.; Fownes, J.H. Seedling emergence, growth, and allocation of Oriental bittersweet: Effects of seed input, seed bank, and forest floor litter. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 190, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chávez, V.; Macdonald, S.E. The influence of canopy patch mosaics on understory plant community composition in boreal mixedwood forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Koorem, K.; Moora, M. Positive association between understory species richness and a dominant shrub species (Corylus avellana) in a boreonemoral spruce forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260, 1407–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Warren, R.J. Mechanisms driving understory evergreen herb distributions across slope aspects: As derived from landscape position. Plant Ecol. 2008, 198, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ali, S.I.; Qaiser, M. A phytogeographical analysis of the phanerogams of Pakistan and Kashmir. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Sect. B Biol. Sci. 1986, 89, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ilahi, I.; Suleman, M. Species composition and relative abundance of mosquitoes in Swat, Pakistan. Int. J. Innov. Appl. Stud. 2013, 2, 454–463. [Google Scholar]
  29. Beg, A.R.; Mirza, H.K. Some more plant communities and the future of dry oak forest zone in Swat valley. Pak. J. For. 1984, 34, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rahman, I.U.; Ijaz, F.; Iqbal, Z.; Afzal, A.; Ali, N.; Afzal, M.; Khan, M.A.; Muhammad, S.; Qadir, G.; Asif, M. A novel survey of the ethno medicinal knowledge of dental problems in Manoor Valley (Northern Himalaya), Pakistan. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 194, 877–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qian, H.; Klinka, K.; Økland, R.H.; Krestov, P.; Kayahara, G.J. Understorey vegetation in boreal Picea mariana and Populus tremuloides stands in British Columbia. J. Veg. Sci. 2003, 14, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wulf, M.; Naaf, T. Herb layer response to broadleaf tree species with different leaf litter quality and canopy structure in temperate forests. J. Veg. Sci. 2009, 20, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nasir, E.; Ali, S.I. Flora of West Pakistan Department of Botany; University of Karachi: Karachi, Pakistan, 2007; Volume 1971, pp. 112–115. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ali, S.I. Significance of flora with special reference to Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2008, 40, 967–971. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nelson, D.W.; Sommers, L.E. Total Carbon, Organic Carbon, and Organic Matter. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Method; Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Loeppert, R.H., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, C.T., Summer, M.E., Eds.; Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 961–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yeomans, J.C.; Bremner, J.M. Carbon and nitrogen analysis of soils by automated combustion techniques. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1991, 22, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Hu, G.; Ni, J. Effects of topographical and edaphic factors on the distribution of plant communities in two subtropical karst forests, southwestern China. J. Mt. Sci. 2013, 10, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Agriculture Chemistry Council, Soil Science Society of China. General Analysis Methods of Soil Agriculture Chemistry; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1983. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  39. Day, P.R. Particle Fractionation and Particle-Size Analysis; No. methods of soil analysis; American Society of Agronomy Madison, Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1965; pp. 545–567. [Google Scholar]
  40. Orlóci, L. An agglomerative method for classification of plant communities. J. Ecol. 1967, 55, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Jongman, E.; Jongman, S.R.R. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  42. Braak, C.J.F.T. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetation 1987, 69, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Skinner, W.R.; Jefferies, R.L.; Carleton, T.J.; Abraham, R.R.D.K. Prediction of reproductive success and failure in lesser snow geese based on early season climatic variables. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1998, 4, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lepš, J.; Šmilauer, P. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shehata, H.F.S. Ecology and nutritive status of Sisymbrium irio L. in the Nile delta. Egypt. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 10, 127–142. [Google Scholar]
  46. Khattak, N.S.; Nouroz, F.; Rahman, I.U.; Noreen, S. Ethno veterinary uses of medicinal plants of district Karak. Pak. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 171, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shah, G.M.; Khan, M.A. Common medicinal folk recipes of siran valley, Mansehra, Pakistan. Ethnobot. Leafl. 2006, 10, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ullah, R.; Iqbal, Z.H.Z.; Hussain, J.; Khan, F.U.; Khan, N.; Muhammad, Z.; Ayaz, S.; Ahmad, S.; Rehman, N.U.; Hussain, I. Traditional uses of medicinal plants in Darra Adam Khel NWFP Pakistan. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 1815–1821. [Google Scholar]
  49. Meher-Homji, V.M. Life-Forms and Biological Spectra as Epharmonic Criteria of Aridity and Humidity in the Tropics; The Bangalore Press: Mysore, India, 1964. [Google Scholar]
  50. Amjad, M.S.; Qaeem, M.F.; Ahmad, I.; Khan, S.U.; Chaudhari, S.K.; Zahid Malik, N.; Shaheen, H.; Khan, A.M. Descriptive study of plant resources in the context of the ethnomedicinal relevance of indigenous flora: A case study from Toli Peer National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Haq, F.; Ahmad, H.; Iqbal, Z. Vegetation description and phytoclimatic gradients of subtropical forests of Nandiar Khuwar catchment District Battagram. Pak. J. Bot. 2015, 47, 1399–1405. [Google Scholar]
  52. Khan, M.; Hussain, F.; Musharaf, S. Floristic composition and biological characteristics of the vegetation of Sheikh Maltoon Town District Mardan, Pakistan. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2013, 3, 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  53. Shimwell, D.W. The Description and Classification of Vegetation Sedgwick and Jackson; Sidgwick & Jackson: London, UK, 1971; p. 322. [Google Scholar]
  54. Nasir, Z.A.; Sultan, S. Floristic, biological and leaf size spectra of weeds in gram, lentil, mustard and wheat fields of district Chakwal, Pakistan. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2002, 5, 758–762. [Google Scholar]
  55. Barik, K.L.; Misra, B.N. Biological spectrum of grassland ecosystem of South Orissa. Ecoprint 1998, 5, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  56. Badshah, L.; Hussain, F.; Sher, Z. Floristic inventory, ecological characteristics and biological spectrum of rangeland, District Tank, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2013, 45, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sher, Z.; Hussain, F.; Badshah, L. Biodiversity and ecological characterization of the flora of Gadoon rangeland, district Swabi, Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Iran. J. Bot. 2014, 20, 96–108. [Google Scholar]
  58. Tareen, R.B.; Qadir, S.A. Phytosociology of the hills of Quetta district. Pak. J. Bot. 1991, 23, 90–114. [Google Scholar]
  59. Batalha, M.A.; Martins, F.R. Floristic, frequency, and vegetation life-form spectra of a cerrado site. Braz. J. Biol. 2004, 64, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Tareen, R.B.; Qadir, S. Harnai, Sinjawi to Duki regions of Pakistan. Pak. Bot. Soc. 1993, 25, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  61. Thomsen, R.P.; Svenning, J.; Balslev, H. Overstorey control of understorey species composition in a near-natural temperate broadleaved forest in Denmark. Plant Ecol. 2005, 181, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ali, K.; Begum, H.A. A comparative assessment of climate change effect on some of the important tree species of Hindu-Kush Himalayas, using predictive modelling techniques. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 3, 1230–1240. [Google Scholar]
  63. Qian, H.; Klinka, K.; Sivak, B. Diversity of the understory vascular vegetation in 40 year-old and old-growth forest stands on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. J. Veg. Sci. 1997, 8, 773–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Triantafyllidis, V.; Zotos, A.; Kosma, C.; Kokkotos, E. Effect of land-use types on edaphic properties and plant species diversity in Mediterranean agroecosystem. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 3676–3690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rahman, I.U.; Khan, N.; Ali, K. Classification and ordination of understory vegetation using multivariate techniques in the Pinus wallichiana forests of Swat Valley, northern Pakistan. Sci. Nat. 2017, 104, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Nazaryuk, V.M.; Klenova, M.I.; Kalimullina, F.R. Ecoagrochemical approaches to the problem of nitrate pollution in agroecosystems. Russ. J. Ecol. 2002, 33, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Colombo, C.; Palumbo, G.; Sellitto, V.M.; Di Iorio, E.; Castrignanò, A.; Stelluti, M. The effects of land use and landscape on soil nitrate availability in Southern Italy (Molise region). Geoderma 2015, 239, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Saxena, R.S.; Gupta, B.; Saxena, K.K.; Singh, R.C.; Prasad, D.N. Study of anti-inflammatory activity in the leaves of Nyctanthes arbor tristis Linn. An Indian Medicinal Plant. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1987, 11, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Macdonald, S.E.; Fenniak, T.E. Understory plant communities of boreal mixedwood forests in western Canada: Natural patterns and response to variable-retention harvesting. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 242, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Small, C.J.; McCarthy, B.C. Spatial and temporal variability of herbaceous vegetation in an eastern deciduous forest. Plant Ecol. 2003, 164, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Showing sampling points in oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
Figure 1. Showing sampling points in oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
Applsci 11 11372 g001
Figure 2. Life-form classes of the plant species recorded in the understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
Figure 2. Life-form classes of the plant species recorded in the understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
Applsci 11 11372 g002
Figure 3. Leaf size classes of the plant species recorded in the understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
Figure 3. Leaf size classes of the plant species recorded in the understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
Applsci 11 11372 g003
Figure 4. Cluster dendrogram classifying understory vegetation into three distinct groups. Note: G (Group); St (Stand).
Figure 4. Cluster dendrogram classifying understory vegetation into three distinct groups. Note: G (Group); St (Stand).
Applsci 11 11372 g004
Figure 5. RDA ordination of physiographic and edaphic variables concerning stands and the understory vegetation. Note: Blue square represent the species point in the ordination biplot; St (Stand number).
Figure 5. RDA ordination of physiographic and edaphic variables concerning stands and the understory vegetation. Note: Blue square represent the species point in the ordination biplot; St (Stand number).
Applsci 11 11372 g005
Table 1. List of the plant species with the family names, growth form/habit, chorotype, life-form, and leaf size classes that were recorded in understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
Table 1. List of the plant species with the family names, growth form/habit, chorotype, life-form, and leaf size classes that were recorded in understory vegetation of oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
TaxonFamilyHabitChorotypeLife-FormLeaf Size
Achyranthes aspera L.AmaranthaceaeHerbPluriregThN
Adiantum venustum D. DonPteridaceaeHerbCosmGN
Ajuga bracteosa Wall. ex Benth.LamiaceaeHerbUniregHMi
Amaranthus viridis L.AmaranthaceaeHerbCosmThMi
Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.BrassicaceaeHerbCosmThL
Arenaria serpyllifolia L.CaryophyllaceaeHerbCosmThN
Artemisia vulgaris L.AsteraceaeHerbPluriregThN
Asplenium trichomanes L.AspleniaceaeHerbBiregHN
Astragalus grahamianus Benth.FabaceaeHerbUniregChL
Atropa acuminata Royle ex Lindl.SolanaceaeHerbPluriregGMi
Berberis lycium RoyleBerberidaceaeShrubUniregNPhL
Bidens cernua L.AsteraceaeHerbBiregHMi
Buddleja asiatica Lour.ScrophulariaceaeShrubCosmNPhMi
Calamintha vulgaris (L.) H. Karst.LamiaceaeHerbPluriregThN
Chenopodium album L.ChenopodiaceaeHerbCosmHN
Convolvulus arvensis L.ConvolvulaceaeHerbCosmHN
Erigeron canadensis L.AsteraceaeHerbCosmThL
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.PoaceaeHerbPluriregHL
Daphne mucronata RoyleThymelaeaceaeShrubBiregNPhN
Dioscorea deltoidea Wall. ex Griseb.DioscoreaceaeHerbUniregHMi
Dodonaea viscosa Jacq.SapindaceaeShrubCosmNPhMi
Dryopteris stewartii Fraser-Jenk.DryopteridaceaeHerbBiregGMe
Elaeagnus angustifolia L.ElaeagnaceaeShrubBiregNPhMi
Festuca gigantea (L.) Vill.PoaceaeHerbBiregGL
Fragaria indica AndrewsRosaceaeHerbPluriregHN
Galium asperifolium Wall.RubiaceaeHerbUniregThL
Hibiscus syriacus L.MalvaceaeShrubPluriregNPhMi
Indigofera gerardiana Graham ex BakerFabaceaeHerbUniregNPhN
Indigofera heterantha Wall. ex BrandisFabaceaeHerbUniregNPhL
Isodon rugosus (Wall. ex Benth.) Codd.LamiaceaeHerbUniregNPhMi
Justicia adathoda L.LamiaceaeHerbPluriregNPhMe
Lamium album L.LamiaceaeHerbUniregThMi
Lespedeza juncea (L. f.) Pers.FabaceaeHerbUniregHN
Lotus corniculatus L.FabaceaeHerbBiregHMi
Malva neglecta Wallr.MalvaceaeHerbUniregHMi
Medicago lupulina L.FabaceaeHerbPluriregChN
Myrsine africana L.PrimulaceaeShrubBiregNPhL
Origanum vulgare L.LamiaceaeHerbUniregThN
Otostegia limbata (Benth.) Boiss.LamiaceaeHerbUniregNPhL
Oxytropis mollis Royle ex Benth.FabaceaeHerbUniregHL
Plantago lanceolata L.PlantiganaceaeHerbPluriregHMi
Plantago major L.PlantaginaceaeHerbPluriregHMi
Polygonatum verticillatum (L.) All.AsparagaceaeHerbPluriregThN
Pteris cretica L.PteridaceaeHerbPluriregGMi
Ranunculus laetus Salisb.RanunculaceaeHerbUniregHMe
Rosa webbiana Wall. ex RoyleRosaceaeHerbPluriregNPhN
Rumex denticulatus K. Koch.PolygonaceaeHerbBiregHMe
Rumex nepalensis Spreng.PolygonaceaeHerbBiregHMe
Sarcococca saligna (D.Don) Müll.Arg.BuxaceaeShrubBiregNPhMi
Smilax lanceolata L.SmilacaceaeHerbBiregLMi
Solidago virgaurea L.AsteraceaeHerbUniregHMi
Tagetes minuta L.AsteraceaeHerbBiregThMi
Taraxacumofficinale (L.) Weber ex F.H.Wigg.AsteraceaeHerbCosmHMi
Trifolium repens L.FabaceaeHerbCosmGN
Viburnum grandiflorum Wall. ex DC.ViburnaceaeShrubUniregNPhMa
Violaserpens Wall. ex Ging.ViolaceaeShrubPluriregGMi
Youngia japonica (L.) DCAsteraceaeHerbCosmThMi
Zanthoxylum armatum DC.RutaceaeTreeCosmMPhMi
Plurireg (Pluriregional); Unireg (Uniregional); Cosm (Cosmopolitan); Bireg (Biregional); Th (Therophyte); G (Geophytes); NPh (Nanophanerophyte); H (Hemicryptophyt); MPh (Microphanerophytes); Ch (Chamaephyte); Mi (Microphyllous); Ma (Megaphyllous); N (Nanophyllous); L (Leptophyllous); Acronyms were assigned by following Shehata [45] except Raunkiaer life-form.
Table 2. Understory flora associated with oak-dominated forest recorded in the three clusters separated by Ward’s agglomerative clustering procedure.
Table 2. Understory flora associated with oak-dominated forest recorded in the three clusters separated by Ward’s agglomerative clustering procedure.
Species NameCodeCluster ICluster IICluster III
M ± SEM ± SEM ± SE
Achyranthes aspera L.As2.41 ± 2.41--
Adiantum venustum D. DonAv--0.77 ± 0.77
Ajuga bracteosa Wall. ex Benth.Ab3.87 ± 2.65--
Amaranthus viridis L.Am5.10 ± 3.23-2.41 ± 1.44
Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh.At--1.16 ± 0.79
Arenaria serpyllifolia L.Am--0.53 ± 0.53
Artimisia vulgaris L.Av7.2 ± 4.71--
Asplenium trichomanes L.As9.14 ± 4.714.23 ± 4.236.6 ± 2.6
Astragalus grahamianus Benth.Ag--0.53 ± 0.53
Atropa acuminata Royle ex Lindl.Aa3.4 ± 3.46-2.42 ± 2.43
Berberis lycium RoyleB9.86 ± 5.497.66 ± 4.917.82 ± 3.54
Bidens cernua L.Bc-1.71 ± 1.71-
Buddleja asiatica Lour.Ba0.93 ± 0.93-1.69 ± 1.17
Calamintha vulgaris (L.) H. Karst.Cv-11.5 ± 4.113.46 ± 1.66
Chenopodium album L.Ca-4.4 ± 4.42-
Convolvulus arvensis L.Ca2.5 ± 2.524.2 ± 2.746.87 ± 1.76
Erigeron canadensis L.Co0.85 ± 0.85--
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.Cd7 ± 56.17 ± 6.174.88 ± 3.32
Daphne mucronata RoyleDm3.83 ± 3.83-1.94 ± 1.34
Dioscorea deltoidea Wall. ex Griseb.Dd1.83 ± 1.83--
Dodonaea viscosa Jacq.Do1.42 ± 1.42--
Dryopteris stewartii Fraser-Jenk.Ds-9.86 ± 9.86-
Elaeagnus angustifolia L.Ea2.3 ± 2.3--
Festuca gigantea (L.) Vill.Fg--0.46 ± 0.46
Fragaria indica AndrewsFi-2.71 ± 2.715.53 ± 2.22
Galium asperifolium Wall.Ga4.36 ± 4.36-1.34 ± 1.34
Hibiscus syriacus L.Hs--0.6 ± 0.62
Indigofera gerardiana Graham ex BakerIg--3.65 ± 2.86
Indigofera heterantha Wall. ex BrandisIh8.93 ± 8.93--
Isodon rugosus (Wall. ex Benth.) CoddIr-8.2 ± 8.2-
justica adathoda L.Ja--1.96 ± 1.45
Lamium album L.La--0.53 ± 0.53
Lespedeza juncea (L. f.) Pers.Lj5.02 ± 5.02-2.91 ± 2.91
Lotus corniculatus L.Lc2.5 ± 2.5-2.52 ± 1.57
Malva neglecta Wallr.Mn--1.06 ± 1.06
Medicago lupulina L.Ml--1.21 ± 1.21
Myrsine africana L.Ma4.5 ± 3.71.85 ± 1.855.96 ± 2.53
Origanum vulgare L.Ov-2.6 ± 2.68-
Otostegia limbata (Benth.) BoissOl--1.60 ± 1.13
Oxytropis mollis Royle ex Benth.Om3.63 ± 3.631.71 ± 1.713.36 ± 1.97
Plantago lanceolata L.Pl2.3 ± 2.39.34 ± 6.156.05 ± 3.29
Plantago major L.Pm-5.9 ± 40.46 ± 0.46
Polygonatum verticillatum (L.) All.Pv-1.71 ± 1.71-
Pteris cretica L.Pc--1.67 ± 1.18
Ranunculus laetus Salisb.Rl--0.93 ± 0.93
Rosa webbiana Wall. ex RoyleRw---
Rumex denticulatus K. KochRu--4.49 ± 2.57
Rumex nepalensis Spreng.Rn-3.57 ± 3.570.53 ± 0.53
Sarcococca saligna (D.Don) Müll.Arg.Ss--0.53 ± 0.53
Smilax lanceolata L.Sl1 ± 12-3.08 ± 1.79
Solidago virgaurea L.Sv--0.53 ± 0.53
Tagetes minuta L.Tg5.02 ± 5.02-1.21 ± 1.21
Taraxacumofficinale (L.) Weber ex F.H.Wigg.To--0.6 ± 0.61
Trifolium repens L.Tr--1.36 ± 0.95
Viburnum grandiflorum Wall. ex DC.Vg--2.28 ± 2.28
Violaserpens Wall. ex Ging.Vs--1.35 ± 0.94
Youngia japonica (L.) DC.Yj-2.7 ± 2.72-
Zanthoxylum armatum DC.Za--1.06 ± 1.06
Note: - Represent absence of specie in particular group.
Table 3. Species richness and diversity indexes of oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
Table 3. Species richness and diversity indexes of oak-dominated forests of Swat, Pakistan.
IndexesGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIFp
Mean ± SEMean ± SEMean ± SE
Total number of Species (S)5.87 ± 0.66 b4 ± 0.37 a10.32 ± 1.5 b4.850.015
Shannon–Wiener Index (H)1.84 ± 0.19 a1.3 ± 0.11 a2.74 ± 0.20 b13.936.97 × 10−5
Pielous Index (J)0.97 ± 0.010.95 ± 0.010.93 ± 0.012.090.14
Margalef Index (M)2.9 ± 0.33 a1.4 ± 0.21 a3.95 ± 0.42 b9.480.00076
Simpson Index (1/D)7.13 ± 1.10 a3.68 ± 0.42 b6 ± 0.61 a3.610.04
Beta diversity (B = S/a)6.41 ± 1.27 a3.68 ± 0.43 a9.85 ± 0.54 b16.452.13 × 10−5
Note: Different superscript letters mean significant variation at p < 0.5 tested by post hoc Tukey HSD; insignificant variations have no superscript.
Table 4. Ordination analysis of the understory vegetation concerning physiographic and edaphic variables.
Table 4. Ordination analysis of the understory vegetation concerning physiographic and edaphic variables.
AxisAxis 1Axis 2Axis 3
Eigenvalue33.2725.1223.96
Variance in species data
% of variance explained12.429.419
Cumulative % explained12.4121.8130.82
Pearson Correlation Response-Pred. *1.000.981
Kendall Correlation Response-Pred.0.960.810.99
* Symbol of steric show signidicant of the data.
Table 5. Average values (Mean ± stand error) of the environmental variables, i.e., topographic, edaphic and soil in the three community types (vegetation groups) separated by Ward’s agglomerative cluster analysis. The three groups were Group I (Quercus baloot–Pinus roxburghii), Group II (Quercus semecarpifolia–Quercus robur), and Group III (Quercus lanata–Olea ferruginea).
Table 5. Average values (Mean ± stand error) of the environmental variables, i.e., topographic, edaphic and soil in the three community types (vegetation groups) separated by Ward’s agglomerative cluster analysis. The three groups were Group I (Quercus baloot–Pinus roxburghii), Group II (Quercus semecarpifolia–Quercus robur), and Group III (Quercus lanata–Olea ferruginea).
Environmental VariablesCodeGroup IGroup IIGroup IIIF-Valuep-Value
Mean ± SEMean ± SEMean ± SE
Latitude (°)Lat35.0 ± 0.12 a34.9694 ± 0.19 b34.58 ± 0.050 b5.570.009
Longitude (°)Long72.28 ± 0.0372.29 ± 0.02372.25 ± 0.0161.720.19
Elevation (m)Elev2017.75 ± 205.23 a2289.5 ± 240.22 b1659.4 ± 64.48 a4.870.015
Slope (°)Slope41.8 ± 1.8141.14 ± 2.5538.66 ± 1.141.150.33
Clay (%)CLY16.37 ± 1.17 a17.5 ± 2.2 a12.11 ± 1.02 b4.650.01
Silt (%)SLT24.44 ± 2.2026 ± 3.629.03 ± 2.740.660.52
Sand (%)SND59.18 ± 2.6656.38 ± 3.4258.85 ± 3.080.170.84
pH (1:5)pH6.4 ± 0.126.6 ± 0.176.26 ± 0.131.250.30
Organic matter (%)OM2.21 ± 0.784.62 ± 0.762.61 ± 0.542.920.07
Lime (%)L3.16 ± 0.524.06 ± 0.613.61 ± 0.380.660.52
Nitrogen (mg/Kg)N0.12 ± 0.040.18 ± 0.030.16 ± 0.030.5030.60
Phosphorus (mg/Kg)P8.24 ± 0.637.44 ± 1.1212.94 ± 4.460.610.54
Potassium (mg/Kg)K146.25 ± 27.07233.42 ± 37.52186.33 ± 26.331.550.22
Wilting point (mL/gm)WP0.114 ± 0.420.11 ± 0.090.09 ± 0.0044.360.02
Field capacity (mL/gm)FC0.22 ± 0.610.23 ± 0.090.21 ± 0.071.310.28
Bulk density (g/cm3)BD1.4 ± 0.11 a1.46 ± 0.02 a1.52 ± 0.01 ab3.430.04
Saturation Point (0 kPa)SP0.44 ± 0.52 a0.44 ± 0.008 a0.42 ± 0.06 ab3.410.04
Electrical Conductivity (mS/m)EC12.41 ± 1.63 a12.8 ± 0.03 a23.46 ± 2.80 b5.440.01
Available water (%)AW0.10 ± 0.380.11 ± 0.0050.11 ± 0.040.460.63
Temperature minimum (°C)Tpmi14.30 ± 1.9211.88 ± 0.3711.89 ± 0.172.130.14
Temperature maximum (°F)Tpma28.98 ± 8.7527.89 ± 5.3336.46 ± 5.752.110.14
Precipitation (mm)Preci49.84 ± 1.2149.16 ± 1.8651.84 ± 0.971.320.28
Relative humidity (%)RH49.84 ± 1.2249.16 ± 1.8751.84 ± 0.981.320.28
Water Holding capacity (%)WHC52.12 ± 1.8254.82 ± 1.9853.47 ± 2.890.180.83
Note: Different superscript letters mean significant variation at p < 0.5 tested by post hoc Tukey HSD; insignificant variations have no superscript.
Table 6. Results of the RDA showed correlation coefficients between the physiographic and edaphic variables and the RDA axes and biplot scores of each variable on all the three axes.
Table 6. Results of the RDA showed correlation coefficients between the physiographic and edaphic variables and the RDA axes and biplot scores of each variable on all the three axes.
S. NoVariablesCorrelationBiplot Scores
Axis 1Axis 2Axis 3Axis 1Axis 2Axis 3
1Lat−0.06−0.49 **−0.02−0.55−3.94−0.155
2Long−0.190.18−0.22−1.811.48−1.74
3E0.23−0.39 *0.062.18−3.090.518
4ASP0.08−0.090.160.74−0.741.25
5CLY0.19−0.36 *−0.191.77−2.92−1.48
6SLT−0.200.290.38 *−1.832.282.95
7SND0.09−0.09−0.260.85−0.72−2.03
8pH0.22−0.22−0.211.97−1.72−1.63
9OM0.090.16−0.0030.881.26−0.02
10L0.210.17−0.39 **1.961.32−3.05
11N0.220.09−0.021.820.75−0.18
12P0.007−0.130.200.07−1.061.56
13K0.36−0.04−0.123.31−0.31−0.96
14WP0.18−0.37−0.181.66−2.96−1.39
15FC0.03−0.130.090.27−1.050.72
16BD−0.100.300.05−0.932.370.42
17SP0.104−0.31−0.050.95−2.38−0.37
18EC−0.1210.43 **0.13−1.113.411.004
19AW−0.1760.250.38−1.601.972.92
20TIVI−0.63 **−0.47 **0.02−5.83−3.790.17
21QIVI0.162−0.41 **0.131.48−3.280.97
22BA−0.025−0.110.22−0.23−0.881.55
23D/ha0.112−0.22−0.171.02−1.78−1.28
24TpMi−0.246−0.09−0.04−2.24−0.77−0.34
25TpMa−0.1850.010.32−1.680.112.48
26Preci0.259−0.090.032.36−0.710.24
27RH0.102−0.05−0.040.935−0.37−0.35
28WHC−0.2730.0050.079−2.490.040.61
Note: * (p < 0.05); ** (p < 0.01).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahman, A.; Khan, N.; Ali, K.; Ullah, R.; Khan, M.E.H.; Jones, D.A.; Rahman, I.U. Plant Species Classification and Diversity of the Understory Vegetation in Oak Forests of Swat, Pakistan. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11372. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311372

AMA Style

Rahman A, Khan N, Ali K, Ullah R, Khan MEH, Jones DA, Rahman IU. Plant Species Classification and Diversity of the Understory Vegetation in Oak Forests of Swat, Pakistan. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(23):11372. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311372

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahman, Ataur, Nasrullah Khan, Kishwar Ali, Rafi Ullah, Muhammad Ezaz Hasan Khan, David Aaron Jones, and Inayat Ur Rahman. 2021. "Plant Species Classification and Diversity of the Understory Vegetation in Oak Forests of Swat, Pakistan" Applied Sciences 11, no. 23: 11372. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311372

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop