3.1. Comparison of Strain Increase Tests Performed under Laboratory Conditions in Air and in Distilled Water at Ambient Temperatures
Figure 3 shows results of the metastable austenitic AISI 347 steel in the initial condition obtained from two SITs performed (a) in air and (b) in distilled water with the slopes of the correlated total strain amplitude
εa,t,cor (yellow), the stress amplitude
σa (green), the changes in tangential magnetic field strength Δ
Mtang (blue), as well as the temperature Δ
T (black) and the open circuit potential
EOCP (red).
The SITs performed within the scope of this research start with a total strain amplitude
εa,t,cor of 0.05 × 10
−2, and after a step length of Δ
t = 1800 s each, the total strain amplitude is increased by Δ
εa,t,cor = 0.05 × 10
−2 until specimen failure. In
Figure 3a,
σa also increases stepwise up to
εa,t,cor = 0.30 × 10
−2, whereupon from
εa,t,cor = 0.35 × 10
−2 onwards a hardening of the material takes place, which can be seen in a superimposed continuous increase of
σa within the step. Just before specimen failure,
σa decreases, indicating a drop-down in stiffness due to advanced macro crack propagation processes. Δ
Mtang also exhibits a continuous decrease up to
εa,t,cor = 0.35 × 10
−2, which flattens thereafter and can be explained by the phase transformation from austenite to α’-martensite. Another change in the Δ
Mtang progression is evident from
εa,t,cor = 0.60 × 10
−2, which is again related to macro crack propagation.
For the SIT performed in distilled water shown in
Figure 3b,
σa also increases stepwise up to
εa,t,cor = 0.35 × 10
−2, after which there is also a superposition with continuous increases in
σa resulting from the strain amplitude-dependent hardening process. At
εa,t,cor = 0.95·10
−2 specimen failure occurs, indicated by a decrease in the Δ
Mtang signal and a prior decrease in stiffness, which in turn is indicated by a decrease in
σa. Δ
Mtang decreases in a step-like manner as
εa,t,cor increases until
εa,t,cor = 0.20 × 10
−2. The range of 0.40 × 10
−2 <
εa,t,cor < 0.70 × 10
−2 indicates a deformation-induced phase transformation from austenite to α’-martensite, since there is a relative decrease within the steps.
3.2. Comparison, Initial Condition and Aged
SITs and CATs performed in distilled water were used to compare the initial condition with the aged condition of AISI 347 defined previously in Chapter 2.
Figure 4a (same as
Figure 3b) shows results from an SIT for a specimen under fatigue loading for AISI 347 in the initial condition showing the development over the time for the correlated total strain amplitude
εa,t,cor (yellow), the stress amplitude
σa (green), the open-circuit potential
EOCP (red) and the magnetic field strength Δ
Mtang (blue), respectively, all up to specimen failure at
εa,t,cor = 0.95 × 10
−2. Here,
σa increases stepwise up to
εa,t,cor = 0.35 × 10
−2. At
εa,t,cor = 0.40 × 10
−2 onwards, a large increase in
σa can be seen until immediately before specimen failure. Afterward, there is a large decrease in stiffness at
εa,t,cor = 0.95 × 10
−2, which is accompanied by a decrease in
σa. From
εa,t,cor = 0.40 × 10
−2 onwards, a stepwise decrease of the
EOCP signal can be seen inverse to
σa, which decreases more significantly from
εa,t,cor = 0.85 × 10
−2 onwards. Δ
Mtang also decreases stepwise with increased
εa,t,cor, although the decrease intensifies from
εa,t,cor = 0.35 × 10
−2. In the range 0.40 × 10
−2 <
εa,t,cor < 0.70 × 10
−2, a strong increase occurs within the load steps, which can probably be explained by the martensitic phase transformation. The specimen failure at
εa,t,cor = 0.95 × 10
−2 is reliable, indicated by a sudden decrease of the Δ
Mtang signal.
Figure 4b shows the SIT for the aged specimen. Comparatively, it can be observed that the aged specimen fails four load steps below the one in the initial condition (
Figure 4a) at
εa,t,cor = 0.95 × 10
−2. The slopes of
σa, Δ
Mtang and
EOCP are comparable to the initial condition up to a step of
εa,t,cor = 0.25 × 10
−2. Thereafter, the slopes are significantly different from the
EOCP. The
EOCP signal of the aged specimen decreases considerably in the range 0.25 × 10
−2 <
εa,t,cor ≤ 0.40 × 10
−2 within the steps. In the following three steps, the
EOCP signal remains approx. constant in the step and again decreases continuously from
εa,t,cor = 0.60 × 10
−2 until specimen failure.
The increase of σa in the first three load steps of the two SITs is due to a pure elastic behavior, which is reflected by the linear stress–strain relationship. From εa,t,cor = 0.40 × 10−2 for the specimen in the initial condition or from εa,t,cor = 0.45 × 10−2 for the aged specimen, the relative increase in σa can be explained by cyclic hardening effects typical for that material under cyclic loading. The decrease in σa in the last load step is due to progressive macro crack propagation in both the initial and aged conditions.
Prior the fatigue tests, the specimens were electrochemically stabilized in a load-free period at the beginning of the test, such that there were no active surfaces in the medium-material interface zone, as can be read from the constant
EOCP slope. The subsequent stepwise decrease in relation to the change of
εa,t,cor or
σa can be explained by activated surfaces exposed as a result of slip band movements and the associated intrusions and extrusions, which leads to a reduced
EOCP signal in each step. By means of a decreasing strain hardening rate (visible from the
σa signal),
EOCP continues to decrease in the step, which can be related to a stable and following unstable crack propagation processes with continuously new uncovered active surfaces. The constant range at the beginning of the experiment of the aged specimen is shorter and based on the aged condition of the material. The relatively significant changes at the step transition can probably be explained by pre-existing micro cracks in the material leading to anodic metal dissolution, whereupon the
EOCP is shifted to a cathodic direction. The
EOCP signal stabilizes after macro crack initiation until it transitions to the previously mentioned stable and then to the unstable crack propagation at
εa,t,cor = 0.55 × 10
−2 [
26].
Figure 5 shows the results of two CATs in the low cycle fatigue (LCF) regime. The CAT for the initial condition was performed at
εa,t,cor = 1.46 × 10
−2 (
Figure 5a) and for the defined aged condition at
εa,t,cor = 1.00 × 10
−2 (
Figure 5b), respectively. Due to the strain hardening potential of the AISI 347 steel in the LCF regime, the total strain amplitudes lead to a constant increase in
σa. The
EOCP signal shows similar slopes for both conditions. In the case of the aged specimen, the
EOCP signal starts at a higher level and shows a lower increase to the local maximum of the signal slope as it progresses. It increases in the first 25 load cycles, decreases steadily thereafter and becomes more pronounced briefly before specimen failure. Δ
Mtang shows a predominantly inverse behavior compared to
σa, with specimen failure indicated with a significant increase from at about 85% of the lifetime. The Δ
Mtang slopes of both conditions can be compared very well with the individual slopes with corresponding total strain amplitudes in the SITs.
3.3. Constant Amplitude Tests Performed under Reactor Pressure Vessel Boiling Water Conditions
To investigate the influence of application-relevant BWR conditions (c.f. Chapter 2), various fatigue tests were carried out in a respective environment. In this context, the course of the stress amplitude and the open-circuit potential were used to characterize the fatigue behavior.
Figure 6 provides the results from two CATs performed under BWR conditions with total strain amplitudes of 0.3 × 10
−2 and 0.55 × 10
−2, respectively. Since with the CATs under BWR conditions, only a measurement of the specimen elongation at the specimen shoulders outside the autoclave is possible, a correlation between the elongation measured directly on the cylindrical gauge length of the specimen and the elongation determined at the specimen shoulders must be made on the basis of the fatigue tests in air as it was already described before. For this purpose, a strain measurement has been developed that makes it possible to perform tests after measuring the total strain amplitude at the gauge length of the specimen while observing symmetrical elongation amplitudes related to the measurement of two inductive displacement transducers at the specimen shoulders. After each loading cycle, the resulting strain amplitude is automatically evaluated online by the control system, and, if necessary, the elongation amplitude is increased or reduced in steps to subsequently obtain the desired total strain amplitude. By doing so, correlation curves were determined, which reflect the specimen elongations to be applied to the specimen shoulders in order to achieve constant strain amplitudes of the test length as a function of the number of cycles. These curves must be redetermined for all tests with different parameters via a best-fit correlation.
Within the CAT with
εa,t = 0.3 × 10
−2 (
Figure 6a) it can be seen that the course of the stress amplitude remains almost constant from the beginning up to about 100 cycles and slightly decreases in the following, which is due to a cyclic softening of the material. Subsequently, saturation occurs, followed by a strong softening at specimen failure, indicated by a drop of the stress amplitude. With regard to the
EOCP signal, this remains constant at a value of approx. 0 for the first 1000 cycles, after which there is a continuous increase until specimen failure. As it was already explained before, the signal changes in the open-circuit potential being dedicated to surface defects caused by the fatigue process.
Since the initiation of damage in the high cycle fatigue (HCF) regime almost certainly starts from the surface, the information obtained from this measurement technique is essential for the design of the components used in the field of nuclear energy. The exposure of new surfaces first leads to an increase in the corrosion current, with the open-circuit potential dropping locally. The subsequent re-passivation processes then lead to a respective increase in the open-circuit potential, which can be seen in
Figure 6a.
In
Figure 6b, the results from a CAT with a total strain amplitude of
εa,t = 0.55 × 10
−2 are shown. Due to the higher total strain amplitude when compared to the results in
Figure 6a, cyclic deformation behavior changes to a continuous cyclic hardening behavior over the entire lifetime indicated by a continuous increase in the stress amplitude. The
EOCP signal also shows a behavior comparable to the CAT with the lower total strain amplitude, changing by about 55% from its initial value to specimen failure.
3.4. StrainLife
StrainLife is a STEP for the fast and cost-effective evaluation of S–N curves, which is considered here to be adapted and validated to nuclear engineering applications. The value of this method is, as mentioned before that only one SIT and two total strain-controlled CATs are required for the calculation of a complete total strain S–N curve. The input variables for the StrainLife method include the measurements of σa, εa,p, ΔT, ΔR, EOCP and ΔMtang, respectively, with their development over the fatigue life to be considered as an additional source of information, as shown for the different experimental results presented before. In the following, the procedure is described for the calculation based on electrical resistance values.
Equation (1) is a relationship by Morrow [
27], which is commonly used to describe the stress amplitude (load variable) and to be a function of plastic strain amplitude (material response).
By using the load quantity
L and the material response
M, Equation (1) can now be described as follows.
Here, the coefficient
K′M and the exponent
nM′ are additionally marked with the index
M to express that this formula is used for a quantity other than the mechanical plastic strain amplitude. Those relationships provide the basis to determine S–N curves may be derived from an SIT, where the load quantity could be considered to be a total strain amplitude
εa,t and the material response electrical resistance Δ
R written then as
The next step is to calculate the average values of the change in electrical resistance of each load level of the SIT and then plot the total strain amplitude as a function of these values (see
Figure 7a). In addition, two CATs are performed, which are also added to the same plot. In the respective example, the change in electrical resistance at the same total strain amplitude in the LIT and CAT may not be identical, which can be attributed to a difference in load-time history between LIT and CAT, resulting in different material conditions with respect to damage accumulated up to the respective point, as well as cyclic strain hardening (
Figure 7b). To correct this a ratio,
Q, between the total strain amplitude of the CAT and the SIT is calculated according to Equation (4).
Using the calculated corrective values,
Q, for both total strain amplitude levels applied in the CATs, a fitting curve for further extrapolation of the data is calculated, where an exponential fit has been chosen. By using this relationship, the stress–strain behavior of the SIT is transferred to the stress–strain behavior for strain-controlled CATs (see
Figure 8).
If electrical resistance is considered to be the relevant material response
M, then this may need to be differentiated between a predominantly elastic and predominantly plastic strain region when plotting the relationship between the material response
M and the load variable
L. Therefore, coefficient
K′ΔR and exponent
nΔR′ have to be differentiated in accordance with the two regions. Equation (3) turns up in two versions, including the exponents
n∆R,el′ and
n∆R,pl′, respectively (see
Figure 8). Using
n∆R,el′ and
n∆R,pl′, the fatigue strength exponent
b and fatigue ductility exponent
c can be calculated using Equations (5) and (6), respectively [
27].
The total strain amplitude contains an elastic portion
εa,el and a plastic portion
εa,pl being additive, as it is shown in Equation (7).
In the case of mechanical stress–strain measurements, the elastic and plastic portion vs. the number of cycles to failure can be described mathematically equivalent to Basquin (Equation (8)) [
28] and Mansion–Coffin equations (Equation (9)) [
29], respectively. An example of such a separation into an elastic and a plastic portion is exemplarily shown in
Figure 9a using the strain measurement as an example.
If the slopes determined according to Equations (5) and (6) are entered into Equations (7)–(9), Equation (10) is obtained. Since at least always two CATs are performed, the coefficients
B and
C can be determined via Equation (10).
Figure 9a gives the result of the StrainLife calculation based on stress–strain measurements. Aside from the calculated S–N curve, the curves for Basquin (elastic portion) and the Manson–Coffin (plastic portion) relationships are also given.
Figure 9b additionally shows the calculated StrainLife curves based on the changes in electrical resistance and the tangential magnetic field strength [
30].
3.5. Uncertainties of Crack Position and Progression on Total Strain Controlled Fatigue Results
Fatigue life is defined by a damage criterion considered, which is in many traditional cases, is the complete fracture of the specimen. However, this is just one damage mechanism (and the last) that occurs during the fatigue life of a material. In many cases, the damage criterion is considered to be crack initiation only. This is to give clear recognition of the description of linear and non-linear fracture mechanics approaches being a mechanism different when compared to the degradation processes appearing before crack initiation. Care has to be taken when the crack propagation phase is included in the fatigue life evaluation, specifically when strain is the controlling mode. In that case, the number of cycles can go up to infinity when a crack opening displacement is erroneously taken as a basis to determine a specimen’s strain.
An alternative to crack initiation is to measure load drop when the fatigue test is performed under strain control. This is well feasible with unnotched specimens when generating materials fatigue data. However, the question arises, which crack size can be associated with a defined load drop criterion.
For the description and evaluation of the incident of crack initiation, the transition between a fatigue analysis from the uncracked to the cracked structure where fracture mechanics-based evaluations in the LCF regime of the components considered are essential. Based on the results of the fatigue tests presented here, the specimens were analyzed with respect to the location of crack initiation and the assumption to be made [
31]. The changes in the stress amplitudes of the total strain-controlled fatigue tests (e.g.,
Figure 4a) are related to crack geometries and crack sizes in order to develop an appropriate correlation.
For this purpose, four possible crack geometry configurations of the incipient cracks in the cross-sectional area of the specimen are considered. These possible incipient cracks are a circular crack (fisheye), a full circumferential crack, a chord crack and a lens crack, all schematically shown in
Figure 10. The circular crack may initiate at an inclusion, as it could be expected for ideal geometrically unnotched specimens [
32]. In comparison, the development of a chord or lens crack, e.g., due to an arbitrary unwanted condition (e.g., blade of a strain gauge transducer), may occur in non-ideal geometrically unnotched specimens. The full circumferential crack is predominantly to be expected on notched specimens.
The crack area
A is different for each crack initiation configuration and depends on the crack depth a.
A can be calculated according to Equations (11)–(14), which is also visualized in
Figure 11. For this case, the radius of the cross-sectional area of the unnotched fatigue specimens is assumed to be
r = 5 mm.
Figure 11 also contains the area fractions with associated crack depths of individual fatigue specimens with a load drop of 25%, which were tested with a strain amplitude of 0.3 × 10
−2. The individual fractographs are shown in more detail in
Figure 12. The fractographs show that the lens crack is a possible idealized crack shape. In addition, the location of the extensometer clip is marked with a green dot in the fractographs. The respective crack areas depend on the stress level and the present number of cycles until specimen failure has occurred.
The numerical analysis tool PROST uses the structure of a solid cylinder for the minimum cross-section of an unnotched specimen with a chord crack so that the crack propagation, as well as the stability of incipient cracks, can be compared with the previously determined measurement results. In the case of pure tensile load (cf. Equation (15)), an analytical approach for stress intensity factors can be used according to [
9], which is based on the British Standard 7910. This is valid for relative crack depths (
a/2 ×
r) in the range of 6.25% to 62.5%.
A limiting load criterion can be determined from the ratio of the ligament area to the cross-sectional area of the undamaged specimen with the crack area
AChord. The fracture mechanics determination of the crack propagation is carried out by the fatigue crack propagation law according to [
33] for austenitic steels (cf. Equation (16)).
Here Δ
K is given in (MPa √m) and crack propagation in (m/cycle).
TR is the time of load increase in (s),
CO2 is the dissolved oxygen concentration in (ppm).
C is a function dependent on the dissolved oxygen concentration. The function
S(
R), which contains the load ratio
R, is defined by Equation (17).
The description of the crack propagation according to [
28] is only valid for load ratios
R ≥ 0. Investigations on austenitic steels have shown that the application of the correlation for
R = 0 is also possible for negative load ratios in fatigue tests in air as an ambient medium [
34]. Therefore, the function
S(
R) for the crack-closure load was extended to include extrapolation to negative
R values. The first term of the crack propagation law (cf. Equation (16)) describes the crack propagation in an air environment, while the second describes the medium component. The crack propagation law in an air environment and
R = −1 is shown in
Figure 13 (blue curve, left axis). The fatigue crack propagation law becomes a straight line in a double logarithmic plot. In the area shaded in blue, the load peak has a linear–elastic stress intensity factor
Kmax >
KIC. In this area, even linear–elastic crack initiation or even specimen failure can be expected (in the elastic–plastic calculation, initiation can be expected earlier). In order for this behavior to be set in relation to the crack load, Δ
K is also plotted as a function of crack depth for different nominal strain amplitudes (green lines). Thus, for a given crack depth
a, the corresponding Δ
K can be read from the desired load amplitude. Starting from the abscissa value, the crack propagation rate can be determined. This procedure is exemplified in
Figure 13 with brown arrows. The process shown in
Figure 13 is only a rough approximation since the crack propagation law may not lie exactly within the range considered.
Figure 14 shows the function of load drops for a constant strain amplitude of 0.3 × 10
−2. The diagram also contains the crack sizes determined during the test, which are further used as input variables in the calculation, e.g., using the PROST analysis tool. Horizontal dashed lines indicate the geometrical estimation of the crack depth
a. The bars (slightly shifted to avoid overlapping) indicate the possible ranges of possible crack lengths depending on the extensometer clip position. The calculation results are focused on a load drop of 25%.
For total strain amplitudes larger than 1 × 10
−2, it should be noted that the reliability of the present calculations is limited since the Chaboche parameters were adjusted for relatively small total strain amplitudes. Further investigations and results of this work are described in more detail in [
31].
From the investigation of crack sizes associated with the fatigue life achieved, an estimation can be proposed that gives a probability of a certain crack size at the defined load drop. The relation is based on the range spanned by two idealized crack shapes related to the experimental findings. The following equation approximates the full span of values for possible crack sizes for an assumed load drop
dL (relative value), based on data of CATs with a total strain amplitude of 0.3 × 10
−2 (
Figure 14).
These values of a minimum and maximum envelope of the crack depths measured in the CATs are shown in
Figure 15. Considering the possibilities, the experimentally observed cracks are within the range predicted by the numerical simulation, which allows possible corrections in terms of the scatter of fatigue life data with respect to a defined crack initiation criterion to be made.