Next Article in Journal
A Practical Model for the Evaluation of High School Student Performance Based on Machine Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Underwater Target Tracking Technology Based on an LSTM–Kalman Filtering Method
Previous Article in Journal
Recommendations for Using QPN Formalism for Preparation of Incoming Request Stream Generator in Modeled System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on Active Tracking of Underwater Acoustic Target Based on Deep Convolution Neural Network
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 23
10.3390/app112311533
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Vector Magnetic Anomaly Detection via an Attention Mechanism Deep-Learning Model

Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11533; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311533
by Xueshan Wu 1,2,3, Song Huang 1,2,*, Min Li 1,2,3 and Yufeng Deng 1,2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(23), 11533; https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311533
Submission received: 23 October 2021 / Revised: 27 November 2021 / Accepted: 2 December 2021 / Published: 6 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deep Learning for Signal Processing Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  • The paper is very good with a clear novel idea. However, I have some insights to increase the impact of the paper. 
  • Figure 1 is clear and good. However, for anyone unfamiliar with UNET this figure will be very difficult to interpret. I do suggest the authors redesign it as it is the most important figure in the paper.
  • The number of experiments is few. I do suggest the authors do more experiments to enrich this paper. 
  • I do want the authors to discuss more the RNN and to explain it and how it was incorporated in their model.
  • The authors must explain more about the UNET and give more details.
  • The literature review is missing! The authors must discuss recent literature especially in the usage of UNET even in other domains. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

It was complicated for me to understand the major points of this paper.

The number of things that have to be clarified clearly and concisely:

  1. What was the purpose of this work? Why is it innovative regarding other works done before?
  2. What exactly was done by the authors?
  3. Describe In physical terms what is the magnetic anomaly detection
  4. Give a simple explanation of the deep learning process regarding magnetic anomaly detection.
  5. What can I learn from the graphs in this paper? 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors did an amazing work. The quality of the paper has increased. However, I want the authors to present the results in a table. I am still confused by the results section. The paper must be rich in experiments. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors answered all my questions and remarks. Now I'm sure that this manuscript is ready for publication.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your comments on our manuscript.

Back to TopTop