Next Article in Journal
Rotordynamic Analysis of Gas Foil-Polymer Bearings Based on a Structural Elasticity Model of Polymer Layer along with Static-Load Deflection Tests
Previous Article in Journal
Preliminary Study on the Development of In Vitro Human Respiratory Epithelium Using Collagen Type I Scaffold as a Potential Model for Future Tracheal Tissue Engineering
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/app11041788
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth of Haematococcus pluvialis on a Small-Scale Angled Porous Substrate Photobioreactor for Green Stage Biomass

by
Thanh-Tri Do
1,2,
Binh-Nguyen Ong
3,
Tuan-Loc Le
3,
Thanh-Cong Nguyen
3,
Bich-Huy Tran-Thi
3,
Bui Thi Thu Hien
4,
Michael Melkonian
5 and
Hoang-Dung Tran
3,*
1
University of Science, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, 227 Nguyen Van Cu Street, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City 72711, Vietnam
2
Faculty of Biology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, 280 An Duong Vuong Street, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City 72711, Vietnam
3
Faculty of Biotechnology, Nguyen-Tat-Thanh University, 298A-300A Nguyen-Tat-Thanh Street, District 04, Ho Chi Minh City 72820, Vietnam
4
Research Institute for Marine Fisheries, 224 Le Lai Street, May Chai Ward, Ngo Quyen District, Hai Phong City 04218, Vietnam
5
Department Plant-Microbe Interactions, Integrative Bioinformatics, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, 50829 Cologne, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(4), 1788; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041788
Submission received: 12 October 2020 / Revised: 31 October 2020 / Accepted: 9 November 2020 / Published: 18 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Biosciences and Bioengineering)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the production of astaxanthin from Haematococcus pluvialis, the process of growing algal biomass in the vegetative green stage is an indispensable step in both suspended and immobilized cultivations. The green algal biomass is usually cultured in a suspension under a low light intensity. However, for astaxanthin accumulation, the microalgae need to be centrifuged and transferred to a new medium or culture system, a significant difficulty when upscaling astaxanthin production. In this research, a small-scale angled twin-layer porous substrate photobioreactor (TL-PSBR) was used to cultivate green stage biomass of H. pluvialis. Under low light intensities of 20–80 µmol photons m−2·s−1, algae in the biofilm consisted exclusively of non-motile vegetative cells (green palmella cells) after ten days of culturing. The optimal initial biomass density was 6.5 g·m−2, and the dry biomass productivity at a light intensity of 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1 was 6.5 g·m−2·d−1. The green stage biomass of H. pluvialis created in this small-scale angled TL-PSBR can be easily harvested and directly used as the source of material for the inoculation of a pilot-scale TL-PSBR for the production of astaxanthin.

1. Introduction

Haematococcus pluvialis is a unicellular green microalga known for its accumulation of astaxanthin to 5% of its dry weight [1,2]. Due to its powerful antioxidant activity, natural astaxanthin from algae is being produced and increasingly applied in the medical and nutraceutical industries [2]. Currently, H. pluvialis can be cultivated in two ways to obtain biomass, as well as astaxanthin. The traditional method is cultivation in a suspension, often separated into two phases: a first phase comprising the production of green cell biomass and a second, astaxanthin accumulation phase involving red akinetes [3,4]. A disadvantage of the suspension culture is its relatively slow growth and low final cell densities, resulting in high energy requirements for harvesting the biomass [5,6].
The second method for cultivating H. pluvialis is immobilized culturing, in which microalgae are fixed to form a biofilm on a layer that serves as a substrate [7,8,9,10,11]. Various types of biofilm-based photobioreactors have been developed, including submerged systems and porous substrate photobioreactors (PSBRs) [12]. In submerged systems, the algal biofilms are submerged in the medium from which they take up nutrients [8,12]. In PSBRs, the biofilm is separated from the medium by a microporous substrate, and the surface of the biofilm is in contact with the ambient atmosphere [12,13]. In their most popular configuration, the twin-layer PSBR (TL-PSBR), PSBRs have been experimentally tested on a wide variety of algae [12,13,14,15,16], and the dynamics of their biofilms have been characterized and modelled in some detail [16,17,18,19,20]. When applied to H. pluvialis, immobilized cultivation is usually a one-phase culture, as the algae increase in biomass and turn red to produce astaxanthin simultaneously with biofilm [15,21].
In Vietnam, angled biofilm-based PSBRs for H. pluvialis have been successfully designed and operated [21,22]. This system shows potential for the production of astaxanthin from H. pluvialis at the bench- and pilot-scales. To prepare initial green algal biomass, H. pluvialis is usually cultured in a suspension with increasing volumes. Algae are then collected after about 20–25 days of cultivation by centrifugation. After centrifugation, the concentrated algal suspension is applied to the substrate layer to grow into the biofilm [2,15,22]. With a usual initial biomass density of 5–7.5 g·m-2, the volume of algal culture needed to inoculate 1 m2 biofilm is about 15–20 L [15,21,22]. Therefore, the process of growing algae in a suspension to inoculate biofilms in PSBRs is still an issue that needs to be solved when upscaling astaxanthin production to the pilot scale [21].
In H. pluvialis cultivation, high light intensities, up to 2000 µmol photons m−2·s−1 sunlight, have been shown to be the most important single factor for the induction of astaxanthin accumulation [4,23]. In contrast, low light intensities, below 100 µmol photons m−2·s−1, are often used to maintain and increase the density of microalgae in a suspension in the green phase [24,25,26,27]. However, the effects of low-light intensity on the growth and cell divisions of H. pluvialis in TL-PSBR biofilms have previously not been studied in detail [15]. Following the above analysis, a small-scale angled PSBR was used to grow green-stage H. pluvialis to take advantage of immobilized cultivation to address the problem of inoculation of the PSBR. In this study, we focused on the determination of the light intensity most suitable for the growth and maintenance of the vegetative green stage of the algal cells. Moreover, the initial biomass (inoculum) density of the biofilm was also optimized to achieve the highest dry biomass yield.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Culture Maintenance of Algal Strain

The H. pluvialis strain CCAC (Culture Collection of Algae at the University of Cologne) 0125 (https://www.uni-due.de/biology/ccac/) was cultured to maintain in 50 mL of a Blue-Green 11 medium with HEPES buffer (BG11-H) [28] in 100 mL flasks with a low-light intensity of 25–30 µmol photons m−2·s−1 provided by fluorescent lamps (FLs; 18 W cool daylight lamp, Philips Electronics and Lighting, Inc., Hong Kong, China).The culture temperature was controlled at 20–24 °C, and a 14/10 h light/dark cycle was used.

2.2. Experimental Design

The two experiments of this study were carried out sequentially on a small scale (each growth area: 0.1 × 0.5 = 0.05 m2) angled PSBR [21,22].
(1)
Effect of low light intensity on pigments and growth of H. pluvialis in green stage on PSBR: With the goal of obtaining algae in the green phase, white light from FLs was used as a light source with intensities of 20–100 µmol photons m−2·s−1. As a small-angled PSBR has 6 chambers (Figure 1), the distance of each one from the light source was different. Each biofilm area in the chambers was exposed to different low light intensities and was considered as one experiment for one value point of this parameter. In this experiment, an initial algal density of 5.0 g dry weight m−2 was applied to the biofilm. The cultivation time on the PSBR was ten days with a 14/10 h light/dark cycle.
(2)
The optimal initial algal density of H. pluvialis in the green stage on PSBR: Initial biomass densities of 3.5, 5.0, 6.5, and 8.0 g dry weight m−2 were tested. Four chambers were used for four inocula using the same media source, air pump, and lighting system. Algae were immobilized immediately after centrifugation. The white light intensity was set at 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1. The microalgae dry biomass productivity levels in these experiments were compared with a culture in a suspension under identical experimental conditions.

2.3. Algae Immobilization on a Small-Scale Angled PSBR

Preparation of microalgae biomass for immobilization: The culture medium was modified BG11-H [28]. The suspended cultivation of H. pluvialis was done in 0.5 and 2 L Erlenmeyer flasks (culture time was about 10 and 14 days, respectively) at 21–25 °C. The green algae were illuminated by FLs at 40 µmol photons m−2·s−1, using a 14/10 h light/dark cycle. Algae (the ratio of cells in the vegetative stage having two flagella was above 80% when examined by light microscopy) were concentrated by centrifugation at 800× g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed.
Determination of dry biomass in the concentrated algal suspension: One milliliter of the concentrated algal suspension was transferred onto filter paper (dried and weighed, m1) and dried at 105 °C for 2 h. Filter paper and dried algae were cooled in a desiccator for 30 min and weighed, and the drying process was repeated until the mass was constant, m2 [28]. The formula calculated the biomass of H. pluvialis in 1 mL of an algal suspension was: m (g/mL) = (m2 − m1); the experiments were performed with three biological replicates to calculate the average dry weight.
The amount of the concentrated algal suspension immobilized onto a surface area was calculated according to the formula: V = Mi/m, where V (mL) is the volume of the concentrated algal suspension needed to make a 0.05 m2 biofilm and Mi is the initial immobilized dry biomass (g·m−2).
Immobilized cultivation: A nutrient-replete BG11-H medium was applied for ten days by replacing 10 L after 2 or 3 days. The addition of 1% CO2 (v/v) to the culture media was used as a carbon source and a way to adjust pH (6.5–8). The electrical conductivity of the BG11-H medium was kept in 1800–2000 µS cm−1 by adding distilled water after every day.

2.4. Analytical Methods

Measurement of immobilized dry algal biomass: After ten days of immobilized cultivation, the algal and substrate layers were harvested and dried at 105 °C for 2 h [15]. The dried product was cooled in a desiccator for 30 min and weighed. The drying process was repeated until an unchanged total weight of mb was obtained. The dry biomass (per m2 of biofilm) was calculated as Ma = (ma − mb)/0.05 (g·m−2), where mb is the weight of dry substrate layer without algae and 0.05 is the square of a biofilm area in the small-scale PSBR.
Dry algal biomass productivity (g·m−2·d−1) was calculated based on equation Mp = (Ma − Mi)/10 (where Ma is the dry biomass after ten days and Mi is the initial immobilized dry biomass).
Measurement of carotenoid/chlorophyll ratio in the dry biomass: The carotenoid/chlorophyll ratio is an essential indicator of the physiological state of H. pluvialis, whether it is the green stage or the red stage [29]. The ratio of carotenoid to chlorophyll is about 0.2 in the green stage and increases in the red stage by order of magnitude to reach about 2–9 [30,31]. The cells transforming green vegetative motile cells to green vegetative palmella cells have carotenoid/chlorophyll ratios of about 0.2–1.0 [32]. This ratio in the dry biomass was determined based on the method of Strickland et al., (1972). To 0.005 g of dry biomass, 2 mL of acetone 90% were added, and then the mixture was ground with a glass pestle and centrifuged at 800× g for 5 min, and then the supernatant was collected. We continued adding acetone 90% to the residue, grinding, and repeated the process until the resulting solution was colorless. The volume was made up to precisely 10 mL with 90% acetone, kept in a 15 mL centrifuge tube, and covered tightly to limit the evaporation of acetone. The pigment extract was spectrophotometrically measured at 665, 645, 630, and 480 nm [33].
Pigments were calculated according to formula:
carotenoid/(chlorophyll(a + b)) = 4.0 × E480/((11.6 × E665 − 1.31 × E645 − 0.14 × E630) + (20.7 × E645 − 4.34 × E665 − 4.42 × E630)), where Ei is the extinction value obtained at the respective wavelength i [33].
Cell morphology determination: Cell samples were collected from the biofilm after ten days of culturing, suspended in an isotonic solution, fixed with 2% formaldehyde, and observed morphologically with a Nikon DS-Fi1 camera microscope (Nikon Corporation, Japan) to analyze different phases of the life history of H. pluvialis.

2.5. Data Analysis

Statistical analysis and resulting charts were made using the programming language R (version 3.5.2). The presented values are an average of six biological replicates with corresponding standard deviations.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Low Light Intensity on Pigments and Growth of H. pluvialis in the Green Stage on a TL-PSBR

Algae in the biofilm were cultured at low light intensities from 20–100 µmol photons m−2·s−1 to stimulate the growth of H. pluvialis and were harvested after ten days to determine dry biomass productivity and pigment ratios.
The results of dry biomass determination show that the higher the intensity of light, the higher the dry biomass productivity (Figure 2). The lowest dry biomass productivity was 2.6 g·m−2·day−1 when illuminated with a light intensity of 20 µmol photons m−2·s−1. At the light intensities of 80 and 100 µmol photons m−2·s−1, the dry biomass productivities were 5.9 and 6.4 g·m−2·day−1, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05, n = 6). However, the dry biomass productivities at these two light intensities were significantly higher than the dry biomass productivities obtained when culturing algae at all lower light intensities (p < 0.05, n = 6).
The ratio of carotenoid/chlorophyll and cell morphology was used to determine the cell stage after harvest. The results clearly showed that the carotenoid/chlorophyll ratio increased gradually with an increment of the light intensity in the range of 20–100 µmol photons m−2·s−1. Still, it never exceeded the value 1.0 in any case (Figure 3). The difference was statistically significant for this ratio at light intensities from 20 to 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1 (p < 0.05, n = 6).
In all manipulations and after ten days, cells had no flagella and represented the palmella cell stage (Figure 4). Light intensities of 20, 40, 60, and 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1 resulted in green cells in all cases. However, at the highest applied light intensity (100 µmol photons m−2·s−1), some palmella cells were noticed to accumulate some astaxanthin (Figure 4e). This result was consistent with those of the carotenoid/chlorophyll ratio and observing biofilm’s surface after ten days of culturing.
Consequently, the light intensity of about 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1 was found to be the most suitable for the growth of H. pluvialis and still maintained cells at the green vegetative stage in biofilm.

3.2. Influence of Inoculum on Growth and Pigments of H. pluvialis in the Green Stage on a TL-PSBR

The final dry biomass obtained after ten days depended on the amount of microalgae initially applied to the biofilm (Figure 5). The highest final dry biomass values were 71.4 and 71.9 g·m−2 when the initial biomass densities were 6.5 and 8.0 g·m−2, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05, n = 6). With the initial biomass densities of 3.5 and 5.0 g·m−2, the final dry biomass values were significantly lower (p < 0.05, n = 6) than at the two higher initial densities.
The highest biomass growth rate (average of biomass increase per day over ten days) was 6.5 g·m−2·d−1 with an initial microalgae density of 6.5 g·m−2, equivalent to the initial density of 8.0 g·m−2 (6.4 g·m−2·d−1) (p > 0.05, n = 6) and higher than the biomass growth rates at the lower two initial cell densities (p < 0.05, n = 6) (Figure 5).
With the same low light intensity (80 µmol photons m−2·s−1), the ratio of carotenoid/chlorophyll in the microalgae showed no significant difference at the initial algae densities of 3.5, 5.0, 6.5, and 8.0 g·m−2 (p > 0.05, n = 6). These ratios were all less than 1 (Figure 6), indicating that the cells were all in the green palmella cell phase, consistent with the results of the light microscopic observations (Figure 7).

4. Discussion

In suspension cultures of H. pluvialis, a low light intensity from white FLs was often used for growing algae in the green phase. However, the green biomass productivity in the suspension cultures was still low after extended cultivation times and decreased with increasing culture volume due to the shading effect (Table 1).
With a multi-stage life history, H. pluvialis cells still have a phase shift when cultured over long periods under a low light intensity because of limiting nutrients (primarily nitrogen and phosphorus) [3]. After inoculation from resting stages, algal vegetative cells have two flagella and are thus motile. After a few weeks (depending on the strain used and the environmental conditions), cells shed flagella and transform into immotile green cells (so-called palmella stages). These cells can accumulate astaxanthin upon the introduction of stimuli (such as high light intensity or nutrient limitation), transforming into the red phase (the so-called akinetes). During the red phase transition, astaxanthin accumulation increases more than 10-fold compared to young palmella stages [29]. Recent studies have shown that motile cells (with two flagella) can also accumulate astaxanthin when stressed by high light intensity, thus facilitating subsequent astaxanthin extraction [24,25]. However, astaxanthin’s content accumulated in the motile cell has been found to be significantly lower than in the palmella, non-motile form. Furthermore, motile cells were found to be sensitive to high light intensity, resulting in photobleaching [35]. In a small TL-PSBR system, motile cells shred flagella and immobilize in biofilm, but non-motile cells are more resistant to stresses and more able to accumulate astaxanthin.
At the lab scale, a small-scale vertical TL-PSBR was used to monitor the influence of low light intensities on biofilm growth: the biomass increased linearly throughout 31 days at light intensities from 20 to 90 µmol photons m−2·s−1 from a high-pressure sodium lamp [28]. The growth rate reached 5.4 g·m−2·d−1 with a full BG 11-H medium, and aeration was supplemented with 5% CO2 [28]. In this study, when a small-scale angled PSBR was used, the growth rate was about 6.5 g·m−2·d−1 at a white light intensity of 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1 without CO2 to the gas phase. The addition of CO2 to the gas phase in a PSBR does not affect microalgae growth at low light intensities [16,28,36]. However, the addition of CO2 to the BG11-H medium to ensure a stable environmental pH is necessary. An FL led to a significantly higher growth efficiency than a high-pressure sodium lamp. With the same light intensity, the effective light spectrum from the FL for photosynthesis has been found to reach 60%, which is more efficient than light from the high-pressure sodium lamp at 38% [37]. The growth of H. pluvialis has been demonstrated to be much faster with the use of light from light-emitting diodes (LEDs), the effective spectrum of which can reach over 90%) [38,39]. However, the FL was still shown to be the optimal light source for the green stage. With the same low light intensity (8 µmol photons m−2·s−1), the use of FLs resulted in more proliferation than red or blue LEDs over a 12-day culture period. The carotenoid ratio was significantly lower [38]. However, the combination of red and blue LEDs showed great promise for simultaneous proliferation with astaxanthin accumulation. Red and blue LEDs are currently being used on pilot-scale TL-PSBRs, resulting in high dry biomass and astaxanthin productivity (unpublished data).
Beside dry biomass productivity, the criteria for creating algal biomass in the green phase were the primary purpose of this study. After inoculation on a TL-PSBR, almost all of the cells shed their flagella and rapidly transformed into the green palmella stage [40]. Light from a high-pressure sodium lamp causes algal cells in the biofilm’s top layers to change into the red phase even with light intensities below 90 µmol photons m−2·s−1. This stage enhanced the acclimation of H. pluvialis to the environment [15,40]. In a suspension culture, the red phase transition is minimized because the cell changes its position in the suspension so that the light intensity it receives is constantly fluctuating [6]. For an immobilized culture, cells on the surface of biofilm will receive light with a steady intensity. They are easily stimulated to accumulate astaxanthin and transform into the red phase [2,15]. White light from FLs also causes phase transformations when the light intensity is 100 µmol photons m−2·s−1. This study showed that a white light intensity of 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1 from FLs ensured the growth of microalgae while maintaining the cells in the green vegetative stage.
The initial algal stock is usually determined by cell density or dry biomass per unit volume [34,41]. However, the initial amount of algae in an immobilized culture in a PSBR is generally calculated by the weight of dry biomass per unit area [2,15,26,27,42]. Therefore, it is essential to optimize the initial algal density when using a completely different culture system. In an immobilized culture, a lower initial biomass density minimizes the centrifugation step to concentrate the algal suspension, but the dry biomass productivity is usually lower [2,26,27]. The results of this study showed that the initial algal biomass of 6.5 g·m−2 yielded the highest dry biomass per day in the range of 5–10 g·m−2 commonly applied in previous studies in similar culture systems [2,15,28]. A comparison of algal productivities between immobilized cultivation in TL-PSBRs and suspended cultivation is not appropriate because of their fundamental differences. However, the convenience and effectiveness of astaxanthin production in TL-PSBRs have been previously demonstrated [2,15,21,22]. This study’s results offer one solution to the problem of input algal biomass for astaxanthin production in large-scale PSBRs. Currently, the green palmella biomass obtained from the small-scale TL-PSBRs is used in pilot-scale angled PSBRs to accumulate and accumulate astaxanthin (unpublished data).

5. Conclusions

A low light intensity of 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1 is suitable for H. pluvialis proliferation but retains cells in the form of green palmella cells when cultured in a small-scale angled TL-PSBR. An initial biomass density of 6.5 g·m−2 is optimal for microalgal growth over a 10-day culture period. The cultivation of green phase H. pluvialis in a TL-PSBR under these conditions guarantees a reliable source of initial biomass for application in larger-scale TL-PSBR systems, providing an alternative to the suspended cultivation of the initial biomass.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-D.T. and T.-T.D.; methodology, T.-T.D.; software, T.-C.N.; validation, H.-D.T., M.M. and T.-T.D.; formal analysis, B.-N.O. and B.-H.T.-T.; investigation, T.-L.L.; resources, H.-D.T. and M.M.; data curation, B.T.T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, T.-T.D.; writing—review and editing, H.-D.T. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. We would like to thank Nguyen Tat Thanh University supported the facilities for this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kang, C.D.; An, J.Y.; Park, T.H.; Sim, S.J. Astaxanthin biosynthesis from simultaneous N and P uptake by the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis in primary-treated wastewater. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 31, 234–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Liu, T. Attached cultivation of Haematococcus pluvialis for astaxanthin production. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 158, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Choi, Y.-E.; Yun, Y.-S.; Park, J.M.; Yang, J.-W. Determination of the time transferring cells for astaxanthin production considering two-stage process of Haematococcus pluvialis cultivation. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 11249–11253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hong, M.E.; Choi, Y.Y.; Sim, S.J. Effect of red cyst cell inoculation and iron(II) supplementation on autotrophic astaxanthin production by Haematococcus pluvialis under outdoor summer conditions. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 218, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aflalo, C.; Meshulam, Y.; Zarka, A.; Boussiba, S. On the relative efficiency of two- vs. one-stage production of astaxanthin by the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 98, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Suh, I.S.; Joo, H.N.; Lee, C.G. A novel double-layered photobioreactor for simultaneous Haematococcus pluvialis cell growth and astaxanthin accumulation. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 125, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Berner, F.; Heimann, K.; Sheehan, M. Microalgal biofilms for biomass production. J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 27, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gross, M.; Jarboe, D.; Wen, Z. Biofilm-based algal cultivation systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 5781–5789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mantzorou, A.; Ververidis, F. Microalgal biofilms: A further step over current microalgal cultivation techniques. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 3187–3201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schnurr, P.J.; Allen, D.G. Factors affecting algae biofilm growth and lipid production: A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2015, 52, 418–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhuang, L.-L.; Yu, D.; Zhang, J.; Liu, F.-f.; Wu, Y.-H.; Zhang, T.-Y.; Hu, H.-Y. The characteristics and influencing factors of the attached microalgae cultivation: A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2018, 94, 1110–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Podola, B.; Li, T.; Melkonian, M. Porous Substrate Bioreactors: A paradigm shift in microalgal biotechnology? Trends Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 121–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Naumann, T.; Çebi, Z.; Podola, B.; Melkonian, M. Growing microalgae as aquaculture feeds on twin-layers: A novel solid-state photobioreactor. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 1413–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Benstein, R.M.; Cebi, Z.; Podola, B.; Melkonian, M. Immobilized growth of the peridinin-producing marine dinoflagellate Symbiodinium in a simple biofilm photobioreactor. Mar. Biotechnol. 2014, 16, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kiperstok, A.C.; Sebestyén, P.; Podola, B.; Melkonian, M. Biofilm cultivation of Haematococcus pluvialis enables a highly productive one-phase process for astaxanthin production using high light intensities. Algal Res. 2017, 21, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, T.; Strous, M.; Melkonian, M. Biofilm-based photobioreactors: Their design and improving productivity through efficient supply of dissolved inorganic carbon. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Li, T.; Podola, B.; de Beer, D.; Melkonian, M. A method to determine photosynthetic activity from oxygen microsensor data in biofilms subjected to evaporation. J. Microbiol. Methods 2015, 117, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, T.; Piltz, B.; Podola, B.; Dron, A.; de Beer, D.; Melkonian, M. Microscale profiling of photosynthesis-related variables in a highly productive biofilm photobioreactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113, 1046–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, T.; Podola, B.; Melkonian, M. Investigating dynamic processes in a porous substrate biofilm photobioreactor—A modeling approach. Algal Res. 2016, 13, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, T.; Podola, B.; Schultze, L.K.P.; Melkonian, M. Design scenario analysis for porous substrate photobioreactor assemblies. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 1623–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tran, H.D.; Do, T.T.; Le, T.L.; Tran-Nguyen, M.L.; Pham, C.H.; Melkonian, M. Cultivation of Haematococcus pluvialis for astaxanthin production on angled bench-scale and large-scale biofilm-based photobioreactors. Vietnam. J. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2019, 61, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Do, T.-T.; Ong, B.-N.; Nguyen Tran, M.-L.; Nguyen, D.; Melkonian, M.; Tran, H.-D. Biomass and Astaxanthin Productivities of Haematococcus pluvialis in an Angled Twin-Layer Porous Substrate Photobioreactor: Effect of Inoculum Density and Storage Time. Biology 2019, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Xi, T.; Kim, D.G.; Roh, S.W.; Choi, J.S.; Choi, Y.E. Enhancement of astaxanthin production using Haematococcus pluvialis with novel LED wavelength shift strategy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 6231–6238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Butler, T.O.; McDougall, G.J.; Campbell, R.; Stanley, M.S.; Day, J.G. Media Screening for Obtaining Haematococcus pluvialis Red Motile Macrozooids Rich in Astaxanthin and Fatty Acids. Biology 2017, 7, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Li, F.; Cai, M.; Lin, M.; Huang, X.; Wang, J.; Ke, H.; Wang, C.; Zheng, X.; Chen, D.; Yang, S. Enhanced Biomass and Astaxanthin Production of Haematococcus pluvialis by a Cell Transformation Strategy with Optimized Initial Biomass Density. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, D.; Wan, M.; del Rio-Chanona, E.A.; Huang, J.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Vassiliadis, V.S. Dynamic modelling of Haematococcus pluvialis photoinduction for astaxanthin production in both attached and suspended photobioreactors. Algal Res. 2016, 13, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Wang, B.; Hu, Q.; Sommerfeld, M.; Li, Y.; Han, D. A new paradigm for producing astaxanthin from the unicellular green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113, 2088–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kiperstok, A.C. Optimizing Immobilized Cultivation of Haematococcus pluvialis for Astaxanthin production. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany, 2016. Available online: https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/6728/ (accessed on 19 May 2020).
  29. Shah, M.M.; Liang, Y.; Cheng, J.J.; Daroch, M. Astaxanthin-producing green microalga Haematococcus pluvialis: From single cell to high value commercial products. Front. Plant. Sci. 2016, 7, 531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Dragos, N.; Bercea, V.; Hegedus, A.; Druga, B.; Coman, C. Astaxanthin production from a new strain of Haematococcus pluvialis grown in batch culture. Ann. Rom. Soc. Cell Biol. 2010, 15, 353–361. [Google Scholar]
  31. Harker, M.; Tsavalos, A.J.; Young, A.J. Autotrophic growth and carotenoid production of Haematococcus pluvialis in a 30 liter air-lift photobioreactor. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1996, 82, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kobayashi, M.; Kurimura, Y.; Kakizono, T.; Nishio, N.; Tsuji, Y. Morphological changes in the life cycle of the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1997, 84, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Strickland, J.D.H.; Parsons, T.R. A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis; Fisheries Research Board of Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang, B.Y.; Geng, Y.H.; Li, Z.K.; Hu, H.J.; Li, Y.G. Production of astaxanthin from Haematococcus in open pond by two-stage growth one-step process. Aquaculture 2009, 295, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, F.; Cai, M.; Lin, M.; Huang, X.; Wang, J.; Ke, H.; Zheng, X.; Chen, D.; Wang, C.; Wu, S.; et al. Differences between motile and nonmotile cells of Haematococcus pluvialis in the production of astaxanthin at different light intensities. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ji, C.; Wang, J.; Li, R.; Liu, T. Modeling of carbon dioxide mass transfer behavior in attached cultivation photobioreactor using the analysis of the pH profiles. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 40, 1079–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Jou, J.-H.; Lin, C.-C.; Li, T.-H.; Li, C.-J.; Peng, S.-H.; Yang, F.-C.; Thomas, K.R.J.; Kumar, D.; Chi, Y.; Hsu, B.-D. Plant growth absorption spectrum mimicking light sources. Materials 2015, 8, 5265–5275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Katsuda, T.; Lababpour, A.; Shimahara, K.; Katoh, S. Astaxanthin production by Haematococcus pluvialis under illumination with LEDs. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2004, 35, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pham, K.T.; Nguyen, T.C.; Luong, T.H.; Dang, P.H.; Vu, D.C.; Do, T.N.; Nguyen, D.B. Influence of inoculum size, CO2 concentration and LEDs on the growth of green microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis Flotow. Vietnam J. Sci. Technol. 2018, 60, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, Q.; Sommerfeld, M.; Lu, Y.; Han, D. Cellular capacities for high-light acclimation and changing lipid profiles across life cycle stages of the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Luu, T.T.; Le, T.T.; Nguyen, C.H.; Ngo, T.-H.T.; Le, H.T.; Dang, D.H. Limiting factor for astaxanthin accumulation in phase 2 of green microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis at laboratory conditions. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 13, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ji, B.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, N.; Wang, J.; Lutzu, G.A.; Liu, T. Biofilm cultivation of the oleaginous microalgae Pseudochlorococcum sp. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 37, 1369–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 11 01788 g001 550
Figure 1. A chamber of a small-scale angled porous substrate photobioreactor (PSBR) was used in the experiments.
Figure 1. A chamber of a small-scale angled porous substrate photobioreactor (PSBR) was used in the experiments.
Applsci 11 01788 g001
Applsci 11 01788 g002 550
Figure 2. Final biomass and biomass growth rate (average of biomass increase per day over ten days) of Haematococcus pluvialis under different light intensities (in the range of 20–100 µmol photons m−2·s−1).
Figure 2. Final biomass and biomass growth rate (average of biomass increase per day over ten days) of Haematococcus pluvialis under different light intensities (in the range of 20–100 µmol photons m−2·s−1).
Applsci 11 01788 g002
Applsci 11 01788 g003 550
Figure 3. The ratio of carotenoids to chlorophylls in H. pluvialis under different light intensities (in the range of 20–100 µmol photons m−2·s−1).
Figure 3. The ratio of carotenoids to chlorophylls in H. pluvialis under different light intensities (in the range of 20–100 µmol photons m−2·s−1).
Applsci 11 01788 g003
Applsci 11 01788 g004 550
Figure 4. Cell morphology of H. pluvialis under different values of low light intensities of 20 (a), 40 (b), 60 (c), 80 (d), and 100 (e) µmol photons m−2·s−1 (red arrow indicates a red palmella cell with accumulated astaxanthin).
Figure 4. Cell morphology of H. pluvialis under different values of low light intensities of 20 (a), 40 (b), 60 (c), 80 (d), and 100 (e) µmol photons m−2·s−1 (red arrow indicates a red palmella cell with accumulated astaxanthin).
Applsci 11 01788 g004
Applsci 11 01788 g005 550
Figure 5. Final biomass and biomass growth rate (average of biomass increase per day over ten days) of H. pluvialis at different initial biomass densities after ten days of growth in a PSBR with a light intensity of 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1.
Figure 5. Final biomass and biomass growth rate (average of biomass increase per day over ten days) of H. pluvialis at different initial biomass densities after ten days of growth in a PSBR with a light intensity of 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1.
Applsci 11 01788 g005
Applsci 11 01788 g006 550
Figure 6. The ratio of carotenoids to chlorophylls in H. pluvialis at different initial biomass densities after 10 days of growth in a PSBR with a low light intensity.
Figure 6. The ratio of carotenoids to chlorophylls in H. pluvialis at different initial biomass densities after 10 days of growth in a PSBR with a low light intensity.
Applsci 11 01788 g006
Applsci 11 01788 g007 550
Figure 7. Cell morphology of H. pluvialis at different initial biomass densities—3.5 (a), 5.0 (b), 6.5 (c), and 8.0 (d) g·m−2—after 10 days of growth in a twin-layer porous substrate photobioreactor (TL-PSBR) with a light intensity of 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1.
Figure 7. Cell morphology of H. pluvialis at different initial biomass densities—3.5 (a), 5.0 (b), 6.5 (c), and 8.0 (d) g·m−2—after 10 days of growth in a twin-layer porous substrate photobioreactor (TL-PSBR) with a light intensity of 80 µmol photons m−2·s−1.
Applsci 11 01788 g007
Table
Table 1. Comparison of H. pluvialis green phase cultivation results in an angled biofilm-based photobioreactor system (this study) with other cultivation systems based on the surface area.
Table 1. Comparison of H. pluvialis green phase cultivation results in an angled biofilm-based photobioreactor system (this study) with other cultivation systems based on the surface area.
SystemStrain NumberMediumCO2 (%)Light Condition (µmol Photons m−2·s−1)Cultivation Period (Green Phase) (Days)Dried Biomass Productivity (g·m−2·Day−1)References
Indoor open pond26BG11For controlling pH20–350
14/10 h		122.2 a[34]
Flask
(250 mL)		SAG 34/1dEG:JMNone40 (FL)
12/12 h		125.52 a[24]
Flask
(3 L)		CCMA-451BBM1.520–30
Continuous		82.88 a[25]
Immobilized biofilm (0.08 m2)NIES-144NIES-NNone150
Continuous		103.7[2]
Immobilized biofilm (0.08 m2)SAG 34-1bBG111.520–100
Continuous		72.3–6.6[2]
Immobilized biofilm (0.05 m2)CCAC 0125Modified BG11190 (high pressure Na lamp
14/10 h)		85.4[28]
Angled immobilized biofilm (0.05 m2)CCAC 0125Modified BG11For controlling pH80 (FL)
14/10 h		106.49This study
a The values are converted to ‘per surface area’.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Do, T.-T.; Ong, B.-N.; Le, T.-L.; Nguyen, T.-C.; Tran-Thi, B.-H.; Thu Hien, B.T.; Melkonian, M.; Tran, H.-D. Growth of Haematococcus pluvialis on a Small-Scale Angled Porous Substrate Photobioreactor for Green Stage Biomass. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041788

AMA Style

Do T-T, Ong B-N, Le T-L, Nguyen T-C, Tran-Thi B-H, Thu Hien BT, Melkonian M, Tran H-D. Growth of Haematococcus pluvialis on a Small-Scale Angled Porous Substrate Photobioreactor for Green Stage Biomass. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(4):1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041788

Chicago/Turabian Style

Do, Thanh-Tri, Binh-Nguyen Ong, Tuan-Loc Le, Thanh-Cong Nguyen, Bich-Huy Tran-Thi, Bui Thi Thu Hien, Michael Melkonian, and Hoang-Dung Tran. 2021. "Growth of Haematococcus pluvialis on a Small-Scale Angled Porous Substrate Photobioreactor for Green Stage Biomass" Applied Sciences 11, no. 4: 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041788

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop