Relationship between Craniocervical Posture and Sagittal Position of the Mandible: A Systematic Review

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors

the manuscript is interesting and suitable for the newspaper although some lacks in method and design have emerged

 

INTRODUCTION

Please provide an explicit statement of the objectives or questions the review addresses.

 

The MATERIALS AND METHODS section presents some lacks:

 

- I suggest authors follow the Prism Checklist 2020 to verify that all points have been addressed correctly. It would be appreciated if it was attached to the review so that it can be easily consulted.

 

- Please specify the methods used to collect data from reports, including how many reviewers collected data from each report, whether they worked independently, and any processes for obtaining or confirming data from study investigators.

 

- The Prisma Flow diagram used is not the latest one, please use the 2020 version

 

DISCUSSION

The discussion is too little developed, it should be implemented with some considerations and reflections on what emerged from the analyzed data

 

FIGURES and TABLES

Figures 2 to 4 are illegible. It would be advisable to insert the tables as such and not as figures which, on the other hand, should be reserved only for diagrams.

Please reduce and schematize the risk of bias table or you could add a summary scheme

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to congratulate the authors for their work and their efforts, however there are some critical issues that compromise the manuscript. My main concerns are related to the results' section as can be seen in my review report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

thank you so much for your work and for making the changes. The manuscript was very improved.