Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Exposure System for Cells Electromagnetic Biocompatibility Studies

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper discusses the design, construction, and testing of a new exposure system developed for cells electromagnetic biocompatibility studies. The paper presents a thorough research effort comprising both the numerical simulation and the physical construction of the experimental system, but also considerations regarding the results of the cell electromagnetic biocompatibility experiment.

While the English language usage in the paper is rather good, there are several situation where expressions could be reformulated for a better understanding

Author Response

Thank you for your comments; they helped improve the quality of our article. The proofreading of the English language was done.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor and Authors, thank you for giving me the opportunity to review this manuscript entitled “Low-frequency Magnetic Field Exposure System for Cells Electromagnetic Biocompatibility Studies”. I have read the manuscript, I believed it was an interesting study.

After considering the suggestions and comments below, the manuscript could be suitable for publication.

 

My Comments:

1# Written English and grammatical mistakes need to be corrected.

 A person proficient in written English edits the manuscript.

2# Please provide a comprehensive abstract that covers the problem and the study's objective, as well as materials and methods, results, and conclusions

3# Introduction: The objectives of the manuscript are usually stated at the end of the introduction.

Further detailed explanations are necessary for readers to understand the essential concept of the Magnetic Field Exposure System and its application in various types of eukaryotic cells.  For example:

Gene delivery: https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2018.1489272

Drug delivery: https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010032

4# The error bar is not illustrated in Figure 12

 

5# The conclusion section is missing in the Structuring of the manuscript?

Author Response

Thank you for your comments; they helped improve the quality of our article. All your comments were considered and incorporated, and the proofreading of the English language was done. Unfortunately, the conclusion section is missing due to objective reasons. In Instructions for Authors, it is stated: that the conclusions section is optional. This section is not mandatory but can be added to the manuscript if the discussion is unusually long or complex.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear authors, 

 

Please see the included file for my review of your manuscript. 

All comments are of qualitative nature. 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your comments; they helped improve the quality of our article. All your comments were considered and incorporated, and the proofreading of the English language was done.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx