Next Article in Journal
Analytical and Numerical Models for TE-Wave Absorption in a Graded-Index GNP-Treated Cell Substrate Inserted in a Waveguide
Next Article in Special Issue
Online Walking Speed Estimation Based on Gait Phase and Kinematic Model for Intelligent Lower-Limb Prosthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Adaptive Cruise Control in Electric Vehicles with Field-Oriented Control
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tailoring mHealth Apps on Users to Support Behavior Change Interventions: Conceptual and Computational Considerations
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Magic of 5G Technology and Optimization Methods Applied to Biomedical Devices: A Survey

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 7096; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147096
by Lida Kouhalvandi 1, Ladislau Matekovits 2,3,4 and Ildiko Peter 5,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(14), 7096; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12147096
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 6 July 2022 / Accepted: 7 July 2022 / Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Smart Wearable and Interactive Mechatronic Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors have well addressed my concerns in the revised manuscript.

Author Response

see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this resubmitted manuscript, the authors seem to address most of the comments of the reviewer. However, no point-to-point response is provided. It is rather difficult to characterize the revised content.

few more concerns for this revised manuscript. 

1. Why has the session 5-biomechanical devices from security issues? It talks about security challenges, why not put in session 6?

2. what are the differences between biomedical devices and wearable medical devices? Why the summary of the section in Figure 2 is totally different from the manuscript sections? 

3. The title, applied should be capitalized as Applied.

 

Author Response

see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The revised version still has numerous grammatical errors, and many expressions should be improved. Otherwise, it is satisfactory in the technical scope.

 

Minor Comment:

·      Fix numerous grammatical errors.

·      Remove Figure 2.

Author Response

see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop