Next Article in Journal
Encapsulated Probiotics: Potential Techniques and Coating Materials for Non-Dairy Food Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Prediction of Compressive Strength Loss of Normal Concrete after Exposure to High Temperature
Previous Article in Journal
Bionic Design of a Winding Roller and Experiments for Cleaning Long Foreign Matter from Raw Cotton
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Particle Sizes and Dosages of Rubber Waste on the Mechanical Properties of Rubberized Concrete Composite
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on the Pavement Performance of Slag/Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Macadam

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 10000; https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910000
by Jinchao Yue 1, Xiaofan Nie 1, Ziran Wang 1, Junlei Liu 2 and Yanchun Huang 3,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 10000; https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910000
Submission received: 10 September 2022 / Revised: 28 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 5 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Advances in Cement and Concrete Composites)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I do not have any comments. It is interesting and very well organised paper. 

Author Response

Thank you for your review.

Reviewer 2 Report

The study examined the application of slag/fly ash-based geopolymers in macadam base. The experimental design was clear and findings were interesting. Some comments were given as follows:

1 In Table 3, the author set six type of geopolymer (CFA-3 & 4 and GFA 2 to 5). However, the result and discussion did not show full comparison and in-depth discussion. Why did not provide the heavy compaction test for CFA-3 & 4 in section 3.1? Please also explain why only lists CFA-4 in section 3.2 and 3.3; CFA-3 was only used in section 3.4.

2 Please define JPA listed in Table 3. What is about the specification?

3 Please list a table for compassion of the properties (e.g. section 3.1-3.4) of geopolymer and JTG/T F20-2015 and/or other previous studies to support the conclusion.

Author Response

Dear reader:

This is my reply about your question, please review.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Please have a look on the attached file, I have two concerns 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reader:

read circles have been deleted, Aggregate and ITZ as well as Aggregate and Geopolymer have been re-marked with a dashed red line.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Thanks for addressing the comments positively all done

Back to TopTop