Next Article in Journal
Quasi-Static Mechanical Properties of Post-Processed Laser Powder Bed Fusion Ti6Al4V(ELI) Parts under Compressive Loading
Previous Article in Journal
Review: Facial Anthropometric, Landmark Extraction, and Nasal Reconstruction Technology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 19
10.3390/app12199549
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Assembly Deviation Analysis of New Integrated TBM Disc Cutter and Design of the Supporting Cutter-Changing Robot End-Effector

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9549; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199549
by Hao Chen, Hao Li, Junzhou Huo *, Bowen Yang and Fan Yang
Reviewer 2:
Minzhou Luo
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9549; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199549
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 15 September 2022 / Accepted: 16 September 2022 / Published: 23 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

this article on the design of a tool for twb discs is very interesting and complete since it considers very well the geometric tolerances and subsequent verification using a Mec.  the only detail that he commented is regarding the design of the bolt removal tool, since a complete analysis of the possible loads and requi. rements  that could be obtained is not observed.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The author for replacement of TBM cutter robot that may occur in the process of working radial deviation and angular deviation, designed by the steering mechanism, flexible connection mechanism, and universal wrench tool change robot end executor, disassembly and assembly for new integration the knife dish, and made a scale model used in the experiment, has specific innovation.

However, adding practical effects and comparison diagrams in the experiment part is suggested, which can show the advantages of the design more intuitively.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper seems interesting for me, while it needs to improve the mentioned remarks. The significant imrovments should be implemented to bold the main contributions. The next quastion will be that how it was improved the previous systems. Hence, in my opinion, the main research quastions should be defined well.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

the comments have been responded

Back to TopTop