Next Article in Journal
Recognition and Location Algorithm for Pallets in Warehouses Using RGB-D Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Sound Imagery of Electric Shavers Based on Kansei Engineering and Multiple Artificial Neural Networks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Moringa oleifera Seed Extract Administered through Drinking Water on Physiological Responses, Carcass and Meat Quality Traits, and Bone Parameters in Broiler Chickens

by
Chidozie Freedom Egbu
1,2,3,*,
Lebogang Ezra Motsei
1,2,
Azeez Olanrewaju Yusuf
4 and
Caven Mguvane Mnisi
1,2
1
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, North-West University, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa
2
Food Security and Safety Focus Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mmabatho 2745, South Africa
3
Department of Agricultural Education, School of Vocation and Technical Education, Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education, Owerri P.M.B. 1033, Nigeria
4
Department of Animal Production and Health, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta P.M.B. 2240, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(20), 10330; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010330
Submission received: 22 August 2022 / Revised: 7 October 2022 / Accepted: 10 October 2022 / Published: 13 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Food Science and Technology)

Abstract

:
The efficacy of Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) in broiler nutrition is unknown. Thus, this study evaluated the effect of administering MSE through drinking water on physiological responses, carcass and meat quality traits, and bone parameters in Cobb 500 broilers. One-day-old male chicks (n = 250, 58.1 ± 0.23 g live-weight) were randomly allotted into five treatments of five replicates. The treatments were: negative control with drinking water only (NC); a positive control with 5 g probiotic (containing Aspergillus oryzae, Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecium, and Lactobacillus acidophilus; bacterial count of 5 × 108 CFU/g) added into 1 L of drinking water (PC), 60 mL MSE/L drinking water (MSE60); 90 mL MSE/L drinking water (MSE90); and 120 mL MSE/L drinking water (MSE120). The MSE groups promoted higher (p < 0.05) carcass weights than the PC and NC control groups. Spleen weights quadratically responded to MSE levels. Gizzard weight, duodenum length, acidic goblet cell count (GCC), and total duodenal and ileal GCC linearly increased with MSE levels. Tibia weight, bone breaking strength, and tibia calcium showed linear increases whereas tibia length and tibiotarsal index showed linear decreases with MSE levels. It can be concluded that the administration of MSE via drinking water improved carcass weights, intestinal morphology, and some meat and bone quality parameters of the birds.

1. Introduction

Sustainable broiler chicken production can contribute to the United Nations’ sustainable development goals to eradicate hunger and ensure good health and wellbeing through the supply of high-quality protein and micronutrients in the form of meat and eggs [1]. It is for this reason that many broiler producers around the world have directed their focus toward optimizing carcass yield and meat quality traits by maintaining high broiler welfare standards, improving gut health, and minimizing locomotion disorders [2]. This has been achieved with prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and phytogenics as viable alternatives to prophylactic and growth-promoting antibiotics. Probiotics are mono or mixed cultures of live beneficial bacteria that are employed in poultry production to create a balanced and diversified gut microbial environment that specifically eliminates pathogens [3]. Optimal dosages of probiotics provide several nutritional and physiological advantages such as improved growth performance, intestinal flora, immune response, and meat quality [4]. However, the rising preference for natural and safe alternatives due to their nonresidual effects and negative effect on the environment has increased the market for phytogenic products as potential alternatives [5]. Phytochemicals are biologically active compounds in plants that elicit physiological changes in farm animals. One of the most recently utilized phytogenic plants in poultry nutrition is Moringa oleifera.
Moringa oleifera seed powder contains biologically active compounds such as alkaloids, flavonoids, phenols, saponins, steroids, and tannins with antimicrobial, antioxidant, and hypocholesterolemic effects [6]. Furthermore, the seed powder is a rich source of crude protein, essential amino acids, dietary fibre, fatty acids, minerals, and vitamins [7], which are essential in maintaining and improving carcass yield, meat quality, gut health, and tibial integrity in broiler chickens. However, high levels of fibre (5.03 mg/g) and condensed tannins (241.67 mg/g) [8] in the seed powder limit its utilization by poultry, especially when included at higher dietary levels [9].
Alternatively, the extraction of water-soluble nutrients and bioactive compounds from moringa seeds could be a strategy to reduce the antinutritional effects of dietary fibre and water-insoluble condensed tannins while allowing the birds full access to moringa’s beneficial bioactive compounds. Water extraction of phytogenic compounds is one affordable strategy that does not require expensive or specialized equipment and can appeal to resource-constrained farmers. However, no studies have attempted to evaluate the effect of administering Moringa oleifera seed extract (MSE) via drinking water in broiler chickens. This study, therefore, investigated the effect of different doses of MSE on carcass characteristics, meat quality, intestinal morphology, goblet cell count (GCC), tibia morphometric parameters, and tibia mineral content in Cobb 500 broilers. It was hypothesized that oral administration of MSE via drinking water would improve carcass characteristics, intestinal morphology, and meat and bone quality parameters of the birds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Treatment Sources and Moringa Extraction Process

The M. oleifera seed powder acquired from Supa Nutri (Johannesburg, South Africa) was soaked in distilled water at a ratio of 1:10 by adding 100 g of the seed powder to 1000 mL of distilled water for 24 h. Thereafter, the extracts were stored in clean containers at 4 °C after being filtered with a muslin cloth to remove the debris from the filtrate.
The extracts were then diluted with fresh drinking water to formulate the treatments that were offered to the birds daily, as follows: (1) a negative control with drinking water only (NC), (2) positive control with 5 g probiotic per litre of drinking water (PC), (3) 60 mL of MSE per litre of drinking water (MSE60), (4) 90 mL of MSE per litre of drinking water (MSE90), and (5) 120 mL of MSE per litre of drinking water (MSE120). The multistrain probiotic (with a bacterial count of 5 × 108 CFU/g) was acquired from QBLabs (St. Louis, MO, USA), which contained beneficial bacteria (Aspergillus oryzae, Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecium, and Lactobacillus acidophilus in a proportion of 1:2:1:2). The bioactive compounds, mineral, and vitamin contents of the MSE treatments were as presented in our previous work [10]. Commercial starter (1–21 days) and finisher (22–42 days) diets purchased from De Heus (Pty) Ltd. (Pietermaritzburg, South Africa) were used during the feeding trial. The chemical composition of the commercial starter and finisher diets was as described in our previous work [10].

2.2. Feeding Trial

The feeding trial was conducted between October and November 2020 at Rooigrond Commercial Farm (25°55′0″ S; 25°48′0″ E), located in Rooigrond (North West, South Africa). A total of 250, day-old Cobb 500 male chicks were purchased from Poultry Ranch (Pty) Ltd. (Pretoria, South Africa). In an environmentally controlled room, the birds were allotted 25 pens (experimental units) to which the five experimental treatments were randomly assigned. The treatments were replicated five times, and each pen (2.55 m Length × 1.0 m Width × 5.0 m Height) had 10 birds. The pens were barricaded using galvanized wire net and the floors were covered with dried sunflower husks. Infrared electric lights were used to maintain the house temperature at 34 °C for the first 14 days and thereafter reduced by 2 °C at weekly intervals. The pens were cleaned regularly and a footbath with a disinfectant was used for biosecurity. For the entire 42-d feeding trial, the birds had unlimited access to clean drinking water and feed.

2.3. Slaughter, Carcass, and Meat Quality Characteristics

On day 42 of age, after the feed was withheld for 12 h, all the birds were weighed to determine the slaughter weight (SLWT) and thereafter taken to a nearby abattoir where they were sacrificed by cutting the jugular vein following stunning. All the carcasses were immediately weighed to ascertain hot carcass weight (HCW) and then re-weighed after chilling in a cold room for 24 h to determine cold carcass weight (CCW). Carcass yield was calculated as the proportion of HCW on SLWT. Weights of all carcass parts (breast, drumstick, thigh, wing) and internal organs (cleaned gizzard, liver, and spleen) were weighed with a digital scale (Adam Equipment S.A. PTY, Johannesburg, South Africa).
Breast pH was recorded at 24 (pH24hr) hours post-mortem with the aid of Corning Model 4 pH–temperature meter (Corning Glass Works, Medfield, MA, USA), and after each experimental unit was calibrated using standard pH solutions. Breast colour coordinates (L* = lightness, a* = redness, and b* = yellowness) were determined 24 h post-mortem with the aid of a colour spectrophotometer (CM 2500c, Konika Minolta, Osaka, Japan) according to the Commission Internationale de I’Eclairage [11]. Breast water holding capacity (WHC) was ascertained by the filter-paper press method by Whiting and Jenkins [12]. Breast cooking loss and drip loss were determined according to the methods of Honikel [13]. Raw breast samples were sheared with the aid of a Meullenet–Owens razor shear blade (A/MORS) installed in a texture analyser (TA.XT plus, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) to measure the shear force.

2.4. Intestinal Morphometric Parameters

The duodenum (the loop), jejunum (tract before the Meckel’s diverticulum), and ileum (tract before the ileocolic junction) were harvested and prepared according to the methods of Biasato et al. [14]. The lengths of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were measured using a tape measure (cm). For the three segments of the small intestine, five villus crypt units with intact lamina propria were selected and placed on slides. The villus height, villus width, crypt depth, villus height:crypt depth ratio, the thickness of lamina propria, muscularis mucosa, and muscularis externa were measured with a light microscope (Olympus CX31, Olympus, Hicksville, New York, NY, USA) at 4× magnification, supported with digitalized live image analysis program (Olympus DP20, Olympus, Bartlett, TN, USA). The crypt depth was measured from the base of the crypt up to the zone of transition between the crypt and the villus. The villus height was measured from the tip of the villus to the villus crypt junction, as described by Sikandar et al. [15].

2.5. Goblet Cell Count (GCC)

Pre-processed slides were exposed to alcian blue periodic acid Shiff (AB-PAS) staining. Three sections were obtained from each intestinal segment and goblet cells were counted in 5 villi per section. Thus, an average of 15 values was measured for each sample. The histochemical differentiation based on acidic and mixed (acidic and neutral) mucin was observed according to the methods described elsewhere by Ashraf et al. [16]. Goblet cells containing acidic mucin were stained blue by the AB, while mixed mucin was stained purple by periodic acid Shiff staining.

2.6. Tibia Morphometric Parameters

The left and right tibia of five carcasses from each replicate were removed as drumsticks, thereafter de-fleshed and dried at room temperature for 24 h. The tibia weight was determined using a weighing scale (Adam Equipment S.A. PTY, Johannesburg, South Africa), while the tibia length (from its proximal to distal end), diaphysis diameter (midpoint of the tibia), and femoral and metatarsal side proximal head thicknesses were measured using an RS PRO digital Vernier caliper (©RS Components, Midrand, South Africa). The bone breaking strength (BBS) was measured with a force gauge fitted on a texture analyser (TA.XT plus, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK). The MAC AFRIC dial gauge vernier caliper (Adendorff Machinery Mart, Johannesburg, South Africa) was used to measure at midpoint the thickness of the medial and lateral walls. The medullary canal diameter was calculated by subtracting the thicknesses of the medial and lateral walls from the diaphysis diameter (midpoint). The Seedor index was obtained by dividing the tibia weight by its length [17]. The tibiotarsal and robusticity indexes were calculated using the following formulae, respectively:
T i b i o t a r s a l   i n d e x = d i a p h y s i s   d i a m e t e r m e d u l l a r y   c a n a l   d i a m e t e r d i a p h y s i s   d i a m e t e r × 100
R o b u s t i c i t y   i n d e x = t i b i a   l e n g t h c u b e   r o o t   o f   b o n e   w e i g h t

2.7. Tibia Mineral Content

The tibia samples were collected in triplicates into crucibles and weighed to obtain their fresh weight. The samples were dried in an oven at 106 °C for 16 h to obtain dry weight and thereafter samples were incinerated in a muffle furnace for 16 h at 800 °C to obtain ash weight [18]. Then, 2 mL of 5 N hydrochloric acid was added to the ash samples and allowed to dissolve, before being transferred to 100 mL volumetric flasks and topped up to the mark with distilled water. After the sediments settled, the fluid was filtered into 14 mL centrifuge tubes and then vortexed before analysis. A solution of 2% nitric acid was used to dilute the samples before being analysed through an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS Nexion 300Q, Perkin Elmer, Johannesburg, South Africa).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Polynomial contrasts were employed to analyse the data (apart from the PC data) for linear and quadratic effects using response surface regression analysis [19]. Carcass and meat quality characteristics, intestinal morphology, GCC, tibia morphology, and tibia mineral content data were analysed using a one-way analysis of variance by means of general linear model (GLM) procedure of SAS [19], where treatment was considered the only factor. For all the measured parameters, significance was considered at p < 0.05 and the least-squares means were separated using the probability of difference options in SAS.

3. Results

3.1. Carcass and Meat Quality Characteristics

For the entire six-week feeding trial, each chicken consumed a total of 3397–3547 g of the commercial diets and drank between 6099 and 6264 mL of water while accumulating between 1859.9 and 1912.9 g of body mass. The weight gain and feed intake data were used to determine the feed conversion ratio, which ranged between 1.80 and 1.91 g:g. There were linear and quadratic responses (p < 0.05) for spleen weight (R2 = 0.882; p = 0.001) and shear force (R2 = 0.549; p = 0.039) in response to MSE levels (Table 1). A linear decrease was observed for cooking loss (R2 = 0.231; p = 0.042), while a linear increase was noted for gizzard weight (R2 = 0.432; p = 0.004) as MSE levels increased.
The GLM data showed that the MSE treatments (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) resulted in a higher carcass yield than the NC and PC treatments. The birds that were orally administered with the MSE (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) treatments had higher (p < 0.05) HCW than the birds in PC but were statistically similar (p > 0.05) to the birds in NC and MSE120. The NC and PC groups had lower CCW compared to all the MSE treatment groups; however, PC was statistically similar (p > 0.05) with the birds in MSE60 and MSE120. Treatment MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120 promoted heavier spleen weight than the NC and PC groups.
The breast meat pH24hr and redness (a*) of birds on PC were lower (p < 0.05) than those on NC, MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120 treatments. Breast meat from MSE60 had lower WHC than those from NC but was similar (p > 0.05) to those from PC, MSE90, and MSE120. The MSE treatments (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) promoted lower (p < 0.05) shear force than those from the NC and PC groups.

3.2. Intestinal Morphometric Parameters

There were linear and quadratic responses (p < 0.05) for ileal muscularis mucosa thickness (MMT) (R2 = 0.853; p = 0.001) in response to MSE levels (Table 2) Linear increases were observed for duodenum length (R2 = 0.328; p = 0.012), duodenal villus width (VW) (R2 = 0.867; p = 0.003), jejunal MMT (R2 = 0.845; p = 0.001), ileal VW (R2 = 0.491; p = 0.001), ileal crypt depth (CD) (R2 = 0.779; p = 0.002), and ileal muscularis externa thickness (MET) (R2 = 0.824; p = 0.001) as MSE levels increased.
There were treatment effects (p < 0.05) on the lengths of the duodenum and ileum, duodenal (VH, VW, CD, and MMT), jejunal (VH, VW, CD, LPT, and MMT), and ileal (VH, VW, MMT, and VH/CD). The MSE treatments (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) resulted in longer duodenum and ileum lengths (p < 0.05) than the NC and PC treatments. The birds that were administered with the MSE treatments (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) had higher (p < 0.05) duodenal VH and CD than the birds in PC but were statistically similar (p > 0.05) with the birds in NC, MSE90, and MSE120. The NC and PC groups had lower duodenal VW and MMT compared to all the MSE treatment groups, whose duodenal VW and MMT values did not differ (p > 0.05). Treatment MSE60 promoted the highest (p < 0.05) jejunal VH, followed by those in MSE90 and MSE120, and the lowest jejunal VH was from the NC and PC groups. Birds on MSE90 and MSE120 had the highest (p < 0.05) jejunal VW, followed by those in MSE60, and the lowest was from the NC and PC groups.
Further, birds reared on NC and PC had lower CD, LPT, and MMT than those on MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120. Treatments NC and PC promoted lower ileal VH than on the MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120 treatments, but PC, MSE90, and MSE120 were comparable (p > 0.05). Birds on MSE90 and MSE120 had the highest (p < 0.05) ileal VW, followed by those in MSE60, and the lowest ileal VW was from the NC and PC groups. The MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120 had higher (p < 0.05) MMT than the NC group. However, PC and MSE60 promoted similar (p > 0.05) ileal MMT. Birds on MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120 had the highest (p < 0.05) ileal VH/CD, followed by those on PC, and the lowest ileal VH/CD was from the NC group.

3.3. Goblet Cell Count (GCC)

There were linear or quadratic responses (p > 0.05) for duodenal and ileal acidic and total GCC as MSE levels increased (Table 3). The duodenal acidic (R2 = 0.485; p = 0.001) and total GCC (R2 = 0.546; p = 0.001) showed positive linear responses. Additionally, the ileal acidic (R2 = 0.338; p = 0.009) and total GCC (R2 = 0.304; p = 0.016) linearly increased in response to MSE dosage levels.
Treatment PC promoted lower (p < 0.05) duodenal acidic and total GCC than MSE90 and MSE120 treatments, which did not differ (p > 0.05). Birds on MSE60 had similar (p > 0.05) duodenal acidic and total GCC as birds on NC. The PC treatment promoted lower (p < 0.05) acidic, mixed, and total GCC when compared to the MSE treatment (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) groups. Birds on MSE120 had higher acidic GCC than those on PC and NC groups. Treatment MSE60 promoted the same (p > 0.05) acidic GCC as PC and NC treatments. However, treatment PC resulted in lower mixed GCC than treatments MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120, which did not differ (p > 0.05). The total GCC of the birds from the MSE treatment (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) groups was higher (p < 0.05) than those from treatment PC.

3.4. Tibia Morphometric Parameters

There were significant linear and quadratic effects on the thickness of the medial wall (TMW) (R2 = 0.747; p = 0.004) as MSE levels increased (Table 4). Oral administration of MSE linearly increased tibia weight (R2 = 0.651; p = 0.003), bone breaking strength (BBS) (R2 = 0.877; p = 0.001), Seedor index (R2 = 0.470; p = 0.011), medullary canal diameter (MCD) (R2 = 0.636; p = 0.004), and robusticity index (R2 = 0.859; p = 0.001). However, it resulted in linear decreases for tibia length (R2 = 0.736; p = 0.001), thickness of the lateral wall (TLW) (R2 = 0.359; p = 0.021), and tibiotarsal index (R2 = 0.735; p = 0.001).
The tibial weight of birds in MSE (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) groups was heavier (p < 0.05) than those on PC. Treatment PC promoted the longest tibia than MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120 treatments, which did not differ (p > 0.05). The MSE120 promoted the highest BBS (282.5 N) compared to PC (246.9 N). Birds on PC had a lower Seedor index than those from the MSE treatment (MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120) groups. Likewise, PC had lower TMW than the MSE administered groups but had the same (p > 0.05) TMW as the birds on MSE60. Birds on NC had a higher TLW than birds on MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120, which had statistically similar TLW values. Birds on PC had a higher (p < 0.05) MCD and robusticity index than those on MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120. Birds on PC had a lower tibiotarsal index compared to those on MSE90 and MSE120.

3.5. Tibia Mineral Content

Oral administration of MSE resulted in linear increases for tibia ash (R2 = 0.941; p = 0.001) and calcium (R2 = 0.983; p = 0.001) (Table 5). There were significant treatment effects on tibia ash and mineral content except for iron. The tibia ash of birds on PC was lower (p < 0.05) than those on MSE90 and MSE120 treatments. Birds on PC had lower tibia calcium levels than those on MSE120, but not comparable (p < 0.05) to MSE60 and MSE90. The tibia phosphorus of birds in the PC group was similar (p > 0.05) to those in the MSE treatment groups. Birds reared on MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120 had higher (p < 0.05) Ca:P than those reared on NC and PC, for which the Ca:P did not differ (p > 0.05). Birds reared on MSE60, MSE90, and MSE120 had the highest (p < 0.05) tibial magnesium and zinc contents followed by those on PC, and the lowest tibial magnesium and zinc concentration were from those on NC.

4. Discussion

4.1. Carcass and Meat Quality Characteristics

Carcass yield is important for determining the growth performance and economic returns of broiler meat. The noted increase in carcass yield, HCW, and CCW from MSE-supplemented birds indicates an improvement in muscle and bone development than in the control groups. This was expectable given that moringa has growth-stimulating properties. Similarly, Tariq et al. [20] noted an increase in the carcass yield and breast weight of chickens fed diets containing 1% clove (Syzygium aromaticum) seed meal. Contrary to this study, Ashom et al. [21] noted a similarity among dietary treatments for carcass yield when roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) seed meal was supplemented (50%) in the diets of finishing broilers. The increased CCW observed in this study among the MSE-administered group could be translated to more cuts available for sale, signifying high profitability.
Furthermore, the lack of differences in gizzard and liver weights among the treatments might be a result of the elimination of the nonstarch polysaccharides of moringa seed through water extraction, as it has been noted by Matshogo et al. [22] that a direct relationship exists between dietary fibre levels and internal organ sizes. The liver is generally responsible for the secretion of alkaline phosphatase, alanine transaminase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase enzymes, and high levels indicate a liver disorder. The similarity in the values of these enzymes among treatments obtained in our previous work [10] justifies the lack of differences in liver weight.
The observed increase in spleen weights indicates that there was a positive immune response to the nutraceutical content of MSE. Thus, MSE nutraceutical can be stated to operate as an immune system booster by increasing blood flow and boosting the body’s immunological function. Hajati et al. [23] noted no variation in the spleen weight when grape seed extracts were administered up to 300 mg/Kg diet to birds.
The oral administration of MSE increased ultimate meat pH, which is supported by the findings of Liu et al. [24] who administered chestnut wood extract to broilers for 42 days. The 24 h pH values generally demonstrate the rate of carcass glycolysis and are linked with meat shelf life. Hence, oxidation tends to occur rapidly in meat with a reduced pH24hr value. The PC treatment had the lowest pH24hr and redness (a*) values, which supports previous studies that noted that light-coloured broiler meat samples have reduced pH24hr values [25].
Meat producers value the WHC because it plays an essential part in determining the ultimate weight of the meat. The increased WHC through oral administration of MSE90 and MSE120 agrees with the findings of Shen et al. [26], who administered bamboo leaf extracts to broilers.
Present findings show that shear force values declined with MSE administration, suggesting that the meat became tenderer with the supplementation of MSE. This was not consistent with the report of Park et al. [27] who reported no effect on shear force of broiler meat when Saposhnikovia divaricata, Lonicera japonica, or Chelidonium majus extracts were administered for 35 days. However, Shen et al. [26] noted variations among treatments for shear force, which agrees with this present study. Nonetheless, the observed differences among these trials can be attributed to differences in various plant species, the concentration of the phytochemicals, and the route of administration of the phytogenics.

4.2. Intestinal Morphometric Parameters

Moringa oleifera seed powder has nutraceuticals that can be utilised to improve intestinal morphometric parameters, goblet cell count, tibia morphometric parameters, and tibia mineral content in chicken diets. The current study demonstrated that oral administration of MSE enhanced duodenal and ileal lengths. In contrast, Hajati et al. [28] found no effect on the lengths of the duodenum or ileum when broiler diets were supplemented with grape seed extract or vitamin C for 42 days. Brenes et al. [29] showed a decrease in the duodenal and ileal length of broilers supplemented with grape seed extracts, while Thomas et al. [30] found that birds fed with diets containing 0.5% green tea high in flavonoids had shorter intestinal lengths. The disparity in results can be ascribed to the difference in the solvents used in the extraction, concentration of the phytochemicals, and the route of administration.
Nutrient absorption from the small intestine is facilitated by specialized structures known as the villi. The increased VH suggests an increased surface area for efficient nutrient absorption. Deep crypts suggest rapid tissue turnover and a requirement for new tissue that promotes nutrient absorption. Therefore, the increased CD implies acceleration in the replacement of enterocytes, which make up the walls of the villi. The increased duodenal VH, VW, and CD are consistent with the findings of Carboni et al. [31], who administered teff (Eragrostis tef) seed extracts to broilers and observed improved VH, VW, and CD. The increased jejunal VH, VW, and CD disputed the report by Ao and Kim [32], that grape seed extract (0.02%) increased jejunal VH and decreased CD. The increased ileal VH and VW corroborated the findings of Rafeeq et al. [33] who found that the ileal VH and VW were enhanced by cumin (Cuminum cyminum) seed and jir (Artemisia scoparia) seed extracts, respectively.
The absorption capacity of the small intestine is determined by the VH/CD ratio, suggesting that optimum digestion and absorption are attained when the VH/CD ratio is increased. The increased ileal VH/CD ratio implies that MSE improved nutrient digestion and absorption, which is not consistent with the observations of Li et al. [34]. Li et al. [34] noted the VH/CD ratio was decreased at the duodenum, increased at the ileum, and had no effect on the jejunal section. The increased VH/CD ratio induced an intestinal structure more oriented to digestion, with improved absorptive and hydrolysis potential, requiring fewer nutrients to be directed towards intestinal maintenance. Therefore, with MSE administration, the intestinal structure of the small intestine was enhanced. Furthermore, the administration of MSE elevated MMT in the three segments of the small intestines and lamina propria thickness in the jejunum. The lamina propria and muscularis mucosa are reliable in moving digested and absorbed nutrients into the bloodstream.

4.3. Goblet Cell Count

Maximizing broiler physiological performance requires consideration of their digestive tract health, which is a complex, multifaceted system that takes several small intestine features into consideration (such as the microbiota and mucin dynamics). Apart for the mixed GCC in the duodenum, the noted increase in the intestinal GCC disputes an earlier report by Carboni et al. [31] who reported that teff seed extract increased duodenal neutral and mixed GCC. However, Tan et al. [35] noted an increased GCC when dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) root extract was administered to gold pompanos fish. Pereira da Silva et al. [36] recorded increased acidic, neutral, and mixed GCCs in all three segments of the small intestine. These findings imply that MSE administration promoted goblet cell production, which protects the intestinal lumens. The increase in acidic goblet cells, containing acidic mucin due to the administration of MSE, possibly contributed to the reduction in intestinal pH, which, in the long term, may lead to increased solubilisation and uptake of nutrients and improved intestinal microbial profile.

4.4. Tibia Morphometric Parameters

The structure of bones and their morphometric parameters together with their structural properties are critical parameters in ascertaining bones’ ability to perform their basic functions, which are to give structural support and ensure normal locomotion. The observed increase in tibia morphometric parameters and BBS is, however, not consistent with the report of Leskovec et al. [37] who reported a negative effect of olive leaf and marigold extracts on tibia morphometric parameters and BBS. Abbas and Khauoon [38] noted increased tibia length but no effect on other tibia morphometric parameters when grape seed extract was administered in broiler diets. The elevated bone weight, BBS, and tibiotarsal index in the current study may possibly be attributed to the presence of flavonoids, minerals, vitamins, and antioxidants in MSE. Similarly, Hohman and Weaver [39] reported an increase in tibia morphometric parameters and BBS when grape seed extracts were administered to Sprague Dawley rats. Shen et al. [40] explained that the presence of antioxidants in plants could lead to low oxidative stress in the bones and potentially benefit bone health. Shah et al. [41] noted differences in the thickness of the wall, medullary canal diameter, and tibiotarsal index, which supports the findings of this study. Moringa polyphenols can positively affect tibia morphometric parameters and strength by protecting the bone through various mechanisms. Through their antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activities, polyphenols can improve osteoblast genesis, suppress osteoclast genesis, and increase osteoimmunological action [37].

4.5. Tibia Mineral Content

The obtained tibia ash and mineral composition results are not in agreement with the report of Liu et al. [42] who administered extracts of Herba epimedii and Ligustri lucidi in diets of Wistar rats and observed a lack of dietary effects in ash content and mineral contents (Ca, P, K, Mg, Mn, and Zn). Calcium and phosphorus are the most abundant minerals in bones, and their distribution influences the formation and mineralization of bone [43]. The observed increase in tibia ash and mineral composition could point to better mineral bioavailability due to the increased absorption of water-soluble nutrients from MSE. The increased concentration of tibia Ca, P, Ca:P ratio, magnesium, and zinc of birds administered with MSE may possibly be due to the increased mineral absorption. Abdullah et al. [44] stated that magnesium enriches bone formation by activating osteoclasts, which increases the Ca:P ratio. The increase in zinc concentration could indicate the stimulation of DNA production in osteoblasts, thereby increasing bone weight and the absorption of calcium ions in the bones.

5. Conclusions

The results showed that oral administration of Moringa oleifera seed extracts up to 90 mL per litre of drinking water improved carcass yield, some internal organ weight, meat quality, intestinal morphometric parameters, goblet cell count, tibia weight, breaking strength, and calcium and phosphorus. We concluded that the administration of Moringa oleifera seed extracts through drinking water has the potential to enhance dressing percentage, organ sizes, intestinal morphology, and some bone and meat traits in broiler production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.F.E., L.E.M. and A.O.Y.; methodology, C.F.E., L.E.M. and A.O.Y.; software, C.F.E. and C.M.M.; validation, L.E.M., A.O.Y. and C.M.M.; formal analysis, C.F.E. and C.M.M.; investigation, C.F.E., L.E.M. and A.O.Y.; resources, L.E.M.; data curation, C.F.E. and L.E.M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.F.E. and A.O.Y.; writing—review and editing, L.E.M., A.O.Y. and C.M.M.; visualization, C.F.E., L.E.M., A.O.Y. and C.M.M.; supervision, L.E.M. and A.O.Y.; project administration, L.E.M.; funding acquisition, L.E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The first author is grateful to the North-West University Doctoral bursary for the financial support received during this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Animal Production Research Ethics Committee of the North-West University (approval no. NWU-02002-20-A5: 1 October 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The first author is willing to provide the study’s data on such a request.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to V. Mlambo (University of Mpumalanga) for his technical support of the manuscript development.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jeswani, H.K.; Whiting, A.; Martin, A.; Azapagic, A. Environmental impacts of poultry litter gasification for power generation. Energy Procedia 2019, 161, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nääs, I.d.A.; Baracho, M.d.S.; Bueno, L.G.F.; de Moura, D.J.; Vercelino, R.d.A.; Salgado, D.D. Use of vitamin D to reduce lameness in broilers reared in harsh environments. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2012, 14, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Soumeh, E.A.; Cedeno, A.D.R.C.; Niknafs, S.; Bromfield, J.; Hoffman, L.C. The efficiency of probiotics administrated via different routes and doses in enhancing production performance, meat quality, gut morphology, and microbial profile of broiler chickens. Animals 2021, 11, 3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Reuben, R.C.; Sarkar, S.L.; Ibnat, H.; Roy, P.C.; Jahid, I.K. Novel mono-and multi-strain probiotics supplementation modulates growth, intestinal microflora composition and haemato-biochemical parameters in broiler chickens. Vet. Med. Sci. 2022, 8, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Paneru, D.; Tellez-Isaias, G.; Romano, N.; Lohakare, G.; Bottje, W.G.; Lohakare, J. Effect of Graded Levels of Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) Seeds on the Growth Performance, Hematological Parameters, and Intestinal Histomorphology of Broiler Chickens. Vet. Sci. 2022, 9, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sugiharto, S.; Toana, N.M. The effect of Kelor (Moringa oleifera) seed meal on productive performance, carcass traits, and meat cholesterol of broiler chickens. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; p. 012043. [Google Scholar]
  7. Unuigbe, C.A.; Okeri, H.A.; Erharuyi, O.; Oghenero, E.E.; Obamedo, D.A. Phytochemical and antioxidant evaluation of Moringa oleifera (Moringaceae) leaf and seed. J. Pharm. Bioresour. 2014, 11, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ijarotimi, O.S.; Adeoti, O.A.; Ariyo, O. Comparative study on nutrient composition, phytochemical, and functional characteristics of raw, germinated, and fermented Moringa oleifera seed flour. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 1, 452–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ashour, E.A.; El-Kholy, M.S.; Alagawany, M.; El-Hack, A.; Mohamed, E.; Mohamed, L.A.; Taha, A.E.; El Sheikh, A.I.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Effect of dietary supplementation with Moringa oleifera leaves and/or seeds powder on production, egg characteristics, hatchability and blood chemistry of laying Japanese quails. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Egbu, C.F.; Motsei, L.E.; Yusuf, A.O.; Mnisi, C.M. Evaluating the Efficacy of Moringa oleifera Seed Extract on Nutrient Digestibility and Physiological Parameters of Broiler Chickens. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage. Recommendations on Uniform Color Spaces-Color Difference Equations, Psychometric Color Terms; Supplement No. 2 to CIE Publication No. 15 (E-1.3.1.); Bureau Central de la CIE: Paris, France, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  12. Whiting, R.; Jenkins, R. Comparison of rabbit, beef, and chicken meats for functional properties and frankfurter processing. J. Food Sci. 1981, 46, 1693–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Honikel, K.O. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci. 1998, 49, 447–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Biasato, I.; Ferrocino, I.; Biasibetti, E.; Grego, E.; Dabbou, S.; Sereno, A.; Gai, F.; Gasco, L.; Schiavone, A.; Cocolin, L.; et al. Modulation of intestinal microbiota, morphology and mucin composition by dietary insect meal inclusion in free-range chickens. BMC Vet. Res. 2018, 14, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Sikandar, A.; Zaneb, H.; Younus, M.; Masood, S.; Aslam, A.; Khattak, F.; Ashraf, S.; Yousaf, M.S.; Rehman, H. Effect of sodium butyrate on performance, immune status, microarchitecture of small intestinal mucosa and lymphoid organs in broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 30, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ashraf, S.; Zaneb, H.; Yousaf, M.; Ijaz, A.; Sohail, M.; Muti, S.; Usman, M.; Ijaz, S.; Rehman, H. Effect of dietary supplementation of prebiotics and probiotics on intestinal microarchitecture in broilers reared under cyclic heat stress. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2013, 97, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Muszyński, S.; Tomaszewska, E.; Dobrowolski, P.; Kwiecień, M.; Wiącek, D.; Świetlicka, I.; Skibińska, M.; Szymańska-Chargot, M.; Orzeł, J.; Świetlicki, M.; et al. Analysis of bone osteometry, mineralization, mechanical and histomorphometrical properties of tibiotarsus in broiler chickens demonstrates a influence of dietary chickpea seeds (Cicer arietinum L.) inclusion as a primary protein source. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official’s Analytical Chemists, 18th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  19. SAS. Users Guide: Statistics, version 9.4; Statistical Analyses System Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tariq, H.; Rao, P.R.; Raghuvanshi, R.S.; Mondal, B.; Singh, S. Effect of Aloe vera and clove powder supplementation on carcass characteristics, composition and serum enzymes of Japanese quails. Vet. World 2015, 8, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Ashom, S.A.; Tuleun, C.D.; Carew, S.N. Growth, carcass and internal organ characteristics of finisher broiler chickens fed processed Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seed meal diets. Growth 2014, 4, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  22. Matshogo, T.B.; Mnisi, C.M.; Mlambo, V. Effect of Pre-Treating Dietary Green Seaweed with Proteolytic and Fibrolytic Enzymes on Physiological and Meat Quality Parameters of Broiler Chickens. Foods 2021, 10, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hajati, H.; Hassanabadi, A.; Golian, A.; Nassiri-Moghaddam, H.; Nassiri, M. The effect of grape seed extract supplementation on performance, antioxidant enzyme activity, and immune responses in broiler chickens exposed to chronic heat stress. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2018, 8, 109–117. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, H.; Mahfuz, S.; Wu, D.; Shang, Q.; Piao, X. Effect of chestnut wood extract on performance, meat quality, antioxidant status, immune function, and cholesterol metabolism in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 4488–4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, E.J.; Seo, Y.S.; Dilawar, M.A.; Mun, H.S.; Park, H.S.; Yang, C.J. Physico-chemical attributes, sensory evaluation and oxidative stability of leg meat from broilers supplemented with plant extracts. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2020, 62, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shen, M.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Han, H.; Niu, Y.; He, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, T. Effects of bamboo leaf extract on growth performance, meat quality, and meat oxidative stability in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 6787–6796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Park, J.; Kang, S.; Chu, G.; Jin, S. Growth performance, blood cell profiles, and meat quality properties of broilers fed with Saposhnikovia divaricata, Lonicera japonica, and Chelidonium majus extracts. Livest. Sci. 2014, 165, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hajati, H.; Hassanabadi, A.; Golian, A.; Nassiri, M.H.; Nassiri, M. The effect of grape seed extract and vitamin C feed supplements carcass characteristics, gut morphology and ileal microflora in broiler chickens exposed to chronic heat stress. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2015, 5, 155–165. [Google Scholar]
  29. Brenes, A.; Montoro, A.V.; Cambrodón, I.G.; Centeno, C.; Calixto, F.S.; Arija, I. Effect grape seed extract on growth performance, protein and polyphenol digestibilities, and antioxidant activity in chickens. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2010, 2, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Thomas, D.; Molan, A.; Ravindran, V. Performance and digestive tract development effects of green tea supplementation in broiler starters fed wheat-based diets. Asia. Pac. J. Clin. Nutr 2007, 16, 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  31. Carboni, J.; Reed, S.; Kolba, N.; Eshel, A.; Koren, O.; Tako, E. Alterations in the Intestinal Morphology, Gut Microbiota, and Trace Mineral Status Following Intra-Amniotic Administration (Gallus gallus) of Teff (Eragrostis tef) Seed Extracts. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ao, X.; Kim, I. Effects of grape seed extract on performance, immunity, antioxidant capacity, and meat quality in Pekin ducks. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 2078–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rafeeq, M.; Rashid, N.; Tariq, M.M.; Shahzad, I.; Sheikh, M.Z.M.; Shafee, M.; Mehmood, K.; Bilal, R.M.; Asmat, T. Effect of Herbal Extract on the Growth Performance, Serum Biochemical Composition, Ileal Histo-Morphology and Immune Response of Broiler Chickens. Pak. J. Zool. 2021, 53, 1793–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, Y.; Xu, F.; Tong, X.; Chen, R.; Shen, C.; Liang, T.; Chu, Q.; Zhou, B. Effects of Macleaya cordata extract on small intestinal morphology and gastrointestinal microbiota diversity of weaned pigs. Livest. Sci. 2020, 237, 104040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tan, X.; Sun, Z.; Zhou, C.; Huang, Z.; Tan, L.; Xun, P.; Huang, Q.; Lin, H.; Ye, C.; Wang, A. Effects of dietary dandelion extract on intestinal morphology, antioxidant status, immune function and physical barrier function of juvenile golden pompano Trachinotus ovatus. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2018, 73, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pereira da Silva, B.; Kolba, N.; Stampini Duarte Martino, H.; Hart, J.; Tako, E. Soluble extracts from chia seed (Salvia hispanica L.) affect brush border membrane functionality, morphology and intestinal bacterial populations in vivo (Gallus gallus). Nutrients 2019, 11, 2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Leskovec, J.; Levart, A.; Žgur, S.; Jordan, D.; Pirman, T.; Salobir, J.; Rezar, V. Effects of olive leaf and marigold extracts on the utilization of nutrients and on bone mineralization using two different oil sources in broilers. J. Poult. Sci. 2018, 55, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Abbas, R.J.; Khauoon, T.H. Effect of Adding Different Levels of Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) Seeds and Leaf Powder or their Extracts on Some Bone Characteristics and Total Ash Content in Broiler Chickens. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2021, 40, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hohman, E.E.; Weaver, C.M. A grape-enriched diet increases bone calcium retention and cortical bone properties in ovariectomized rats. J. Nutr. 2015, 145, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Shen, C.-L.; Cao, J.J.; Dagda, R.Y.; Chanjaplammootil, S.; Lu, C.; Chyu, M.-C.; Gao, W.; Wang, J.-S.; Yeh, J.K. Green tea polyphenols benefits body composition and improves bone quality in long-term high-fat diet–induced obese rats. Nutr. Res. 2012, 32, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shah, M.; Zaneb, H.; Masood, S.; Khan, R.U.; Din, S.; Khan, I.; Tariq, A. Ameliorative effect of zinc and multistrain probiotic on muscle and bone characteristics in broiler reared under cyclic heat stress. Pak. J. Zool. 2019, 51, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, R.-H.; Kang, X.; Xu, L.-P.; Nian, H.-L.; Yang, X.-W.; Shi, H.-T.; Wang, X.-J. Effects of the combined extracts of Herba Epimedii and Fructus Ligustri Lucidi on bone mineral content and bone turnover in osteoporotic rats. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Moyo, S.; Jaja, I.F.; Mopipi, K.; Masika, P.; Muchenje, V. Effect of graded levels of Imbrasia belina meal on blood lipid profile, bone morphometric and mineral content of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2021, 271, 114736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Abdullah, S.; Masood, S.; Zaneb, H.; Rabbani, I.; Akbar, J.; Kuthu, Z.; Masood, A.; Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E. Effects of copper nanoparticles on performance, muscle and bone characteristics and serum metabolites in broilers. Braz. J. Biol. 2022, 84, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Carcass and meat quality characteristics (g, unless otherwise stated) of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
Table 1. Carcass and meat quality characteristics (g, unless otherwise stated) of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
2 Parameters1 Treatmentsp Value
NCPCMSE60MSE90MSE1203 SEMGLMLinearQuadratic
SLWT1918193219561971193921.000.1540.1350.517
Carcass yield (%)69.61 b69.39 b71.37 a71.43 a71.34 a0.2700.0020.9670.436
HCW1335 b1341 b1396 a1408 a1383 a,b15.880.0060.2960.967
CCW1295 c1307 b,c1350 a,b1365 a1335 a,b,c15.000.0110.4650.980
Breast weight618.3694.6624.4678.4633.735.400.2420.4010.386
Drumstick weight133.0151.6135.8136.2137.86.6300.3250.6100.299
Thigh weight156.5142.2160.2160.7161.716.120.4150.1760.510
Gizzard43.0044.4045.9044.8045.901.1400.5420.0040.174
Liver55.4055.7055.1055.8049.503.0100.0840.3990.220
Spleen3.12 b3.13 b3.22 a3.24 a3.22 a0.0100.0120.0010.001
pH24hr5.89 a,b5.87 b5.96 a,b5.89 a,b6.01 a0.0400.0220.1850.656
L* (lightness)51.5852.4350.7451.5951.670.8100.6840.8610.427
a* (redness)−0.93 a,b−1.22 b−0.55 a,b−0.57 a,b−0.11 a0.3200.0210.1360.771
b* (yellowness)5.605.434.634.865.200.7700.5420.6210.358
WHC (%)16.40 a12.90 a,b11.20 b12.80 a,b12.80 a,b1.2700.0250.0570.068
Drip loss (%)4.795.824.535.195.440.8700.4850.5340.619
Cooking loss (%)38.1436.5932.2232.4630.482.5100.8420.0420.603
Shear force (N)3.19 a3.27 a2.24 b2.28 b2.28 b0.1900.0050.0010.039
a,b,c Values within the same row with different subscripts significantly differed (p < 0.05). 1 Treatments: NC = drinking water only; PC = 5 g probiotic/L of drinking water; MSE60 = 60 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE90 = 90 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE120 = 120 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water. 2 Parameters: SLWT = slaughter weight; HCW = hot carcass weight; CCW = cold carcass weight; pH24hr = pH at 24 h post-mortem; WHC: water holding capacity. 3 SEM = standard error of the mean.
Table 2. Intestinal morphometric parameters of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
Table 2. Intestinal morphometric parameters of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
2 Parameters1 Treatmentsp Value
NCPCMSE60MSE90MSE1203 SEMGLMLinearQuadratic
Duodenum length (cm)25.81b c25.34 c26.55 a27.54 a27.15 a0.4400.0230.0120.515
Jejunum length (cm)67.8767.1268.7469.1569.470.9300.8450.1620.937
Ileum length (cm)67.35 b66.36 b69.52 a70.71 a69.72 a0.9200.0340.0640.245
Duodenum
VH (µm)1904 b1890 b2009 a1968 a,b1955 a,b27.300.0180.8720.375
VW (µm)162.2 b160.8 b173.3 a181.5 a179.8 a3.4030.0090.0030.586
CD (µm)188.4 b187.4 b196.2 a191.2 a,b192.4 a,b1.9310.0040.1380.262
LPT (µm)125.2121.6127.8135.0136.85.4870.8450.2840.526
MMT (µm)49.00 b48.80 b51.70 a52.40 a51.90 a0.9580.0010.5350.527
MET (µm)247.2244.2247.4256.4255.45.2570.9420.2410.681
VH/CD10.2110.0810.2410.3010.170.1180.5840.5720.475
Jejunum
VH (µm)1632 c1620 c1739 a1684 b1686 b14.490.0050.0910.095
VW (µm)123.4 c126.2 c143.4 b154.6 a151.4 a2.1600.0090.6270.296
CD (µm)163.8 b158.8 b171.6 a169.2 a169.8 a2.1780.0250.0650.996
LPT (µm)118.8 b118.6 b121.1 a121.2 a121.0 a0.6760.0050.7000.615
MMT (µm)39.20 b38.80 b40.80 a41.00 a40.60 a0.4860.0060.0010.480
MET (µm)240.4226.0233.6244.4239.45.9860.7520.8530.746
VH/CD9.98010.2110.1310.2010.130.1200.6810.0930.198
Ileum
VH (µm)1209 c1249 b,c1333 a1286 a,b1278 a,b20.590.0110.6310.531
VW (µm)120.7 c123.0 c132.7 b142.9 a142.1 a2.1980.0080.0360.955
CD (µm)126.2127.0127.1126.4126.21.5200.1420.0020.458
LPT (µm)127.6108.4112.4119.6119.47.4670.2140.4570.500
MMT (µm)34.00 c34.40 b,c35.20 a,b35.60 a35.80 a0.3200.0010.0010.025
MET (µm)234.8235.0235.4235.6235.40.4100.5240.0010.789
VH/CD9.570 c9.780 b10.13 a10.18 a10.13 a0.0600.0100.7630.851
a,b,c Values within the same row with different subscripts significantly differed (p < 0.05). 1 Treatments: NC = drinking water only; PC = 5 g probiotic/L of drinking water; MSE60 = 60 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE90 = 90 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE120 = 120 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water. 2 Parameters: VH = villus height; VW = villus width; CD = crypt depth; LPT = lamina propria thickness; MMT = muscularis mucosa thickness; MET = muscularis externa thickness; VH/CD = villus height/crypt depth ratio. 3 SEM = standard error of the mean.
Table 3. Goblet cell count (per 100 µm villus height) of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
Table 3. Goblet cell count (per 100 µm villus height) of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
2 Intestinal Segments3 Goblet Cell1 Treatmentp Value
NCPCMSE60MSE90MSE1204 SEMGLMLinearQuadratic
DuodenumAcidic46.01 b,c45.25 c47.16 b49.55 a48.98 a0.6170.0010.0010752
Mixed36.8036.0137.6738.5938.391.0110.2540.2260.823
Total82.81 b,c81.25 c84.83 b88.15 a87.38 a0.7220.0150.0030.614
JejunumAcidic50.57 b47.86 c51.04 a,b52.33 a51.84 a,b0.5440.0030.0630.794
Mixed43.71 b41.29 b44.71 a45.92 a45.29 a0.8270.0070.1160.591
Total94.28 b89.15 c95.75 a,b98.25 a97.13 a,b1.1830.0040.0580.630
IleumAcidic50.97 b,c49.71 c51.74 a,b,c52.86 a,b53.31 a0.6970.0310.0090.734
Mixed44.37 b43.06 b45.30 a,b46.28 a45.23 a,b0.7540.0050.2330.339
Total95.34 b92.77 c97.04 a99.14 a98.55 a1.1060.0020.0160.619
a,b,c Values within the same row with different subscripts significantly differed (p < 0.05). 1 Treatments: NC = drinking water only; PC = 5 g probiotic/L of drinking water; MSE60 = 60 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE90 = 90 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE120 = 120 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water. 2 Intestinal segments: duodenum, jejunum, ileum. 3 Goblet cell: acidic, mixed, total. 4 SEM = standard error of the mean.
Table 4. Tibia morphometric parameters of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
Table 4. Tibia morphometric parameters of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
2 Parameters1 Treatmentsp Value
NCPCMSE60MSE90MSE1203 SEMGLMLinearQuadratic
Tibia weight (g)10.56 c11.56 b13.50 a14.06 a13.94 a0.3300.0030.0030.307
Tibia length (mm)101.5 a,b103.5 a97.55 b,c95.49 c96.11 c1.5000.0110.0010.173
Diaphysis diameter (mm)8.568.908.648.648.400.1800.0870.3820.167
FPHT (mm)26.2726.1225.5125.1925.610.4100.0750.1690.720
MPHT (mm)19.5219.9619.5119.3019.230.4500.1680.0840.397
BBS (N)242.8 d246.9 d261.0 c273.0 b282.5 a2.1700.0010.0010.843
Seedor index (g/mm)0.10 b0.11 b0.14 a0.15 a0.15 a0.0100.0140.0110.116
TMW (mm)1.33 c1.38 b,c1.45 a,b1.52 a1.50 a0.0300.0090.0020.004
TLW (mm)2.24 b2.31 b2.47 a2.55 a2.51 a0.0300.0290.0210.540
MCD (mm)5.01 a,b5.21 a4.720 b,c4.57 b,c4.39 c0.1600.0200.0040.494
Tibiotarsal index41.61 c41.64 c45.48 b47.12 a,b47.81 a0.7400.0030.0010.176
Robusticity index21.76 a,b22.03 a21.19 b,c20.89 c20.98 c0.2100.0050.0010.457
a,b,c,d Values within the same row with different subscripts significantly differed (p < 0.05). 1 Treatments: NC = drinking water only; PC = 5 g probiotic/L of drinking water; MSE60 = 60 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE90 = 90 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE120 = 120 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water. 2 Parameters: FPHT = Femoral side proximal head thickness; MPHT = metatarsal side proximal head thickness; BBS = bone breaking strength; TMW = thickness of the medial wall; TLW = thickness of the lateral wall; MCD = medullary canal diameter. 3 SEM = standard error of the mean.
Table 5. Tibia ash and mineral content of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
Table 5. Tibia ash and mineral content of six-week-old broiler chickens (n = 125) orally administered with varying levels of moringa seed extract (MSE) in drinking water.
2 Parameters1 Treatmentsp Value
NCPCMSE60MSE90MSE1203 SEMGLMLinearQuadratic
Ash (g)43.36 d45.34 c47.63 b49.88 a50.86 a0.4600.0010.0010.227
Calcium (mg/g)214.0 e222.5 d238.6 b236.0 b240.5 a0.8300.0010.0010.208
Phosphorus (mg/g)114.0 b118.7 a119.0 a117.6 a118.4 a2.0800.0050.1950.296
Ca:P (mg/mg)1.88 b1.87 b2.01 a2.01 a2.03 a0.0400.0100.0700.220
Magnesium (mg/g)4.66 c6.09 b6.90 a7.02 a6.95 a0.6800.0070.0600.984
Iron (µg/g)44.5146.3441.5148.3750.423.4800.1740.2090.701
Zinc (µg/g)1.45 c1.60 b1.75 a1.77 a1.80 a0.1000.0110.4890.187
a,b,c,d,e Values within the same row with different subscripts significantly differed (p < 0.05). 1 Treatments: NC = drinking water only; PC = 5 g probiotic/L of drinking water; MSE60 = 60 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE90 = 90 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water; MSE120 = 120 mL of moringa seed extract/L of drinking water. 2 Parameters: Ca:P = calcium/phosphorus ratio. 3 SEM = standard error of the mean.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Egbu, C.F.; Motsei, L.E.; Yusuf, A.O.; Mnisi, C.M. Effect of Moringa oleifera Seed Extract Administered through Drinking Water on Physiological Responses, Carcass and Meat Quality Traits, and Bone Parameters in Broiler Chickens. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10330. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010330

AMA Style

Egbu CF, Motsei LE, Yusuf AO, Mnisi CM. Effect of Moringa oleifera Seed Extract Administered through Drinking Water on Physiological Responses, Carcass and Meat Quality Traits, and Bone Parameters in Broiler Chickens. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(20):10330. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Egbu, Chidozie Freedom, Lebogang Ezra Motsei, Azeez Olanrewaju Yusuf, and Caven Mguvane Mnisi. 2022. "Effect of Moringa oleifera Seed Extract Administered through Drinking Water on Physiological Responses, Carcass and Meat Quality Traits, and Bone Parameters in Broiler Chickens" Applied Sciences 12, no. 20: 10330. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop