Next Article in Journal
Vacant House Characteristics by Use Area and Their Application to Sustainable Community
Next Article in Special Issue
Elaboration of a Multi-Objective Optimization Method for High-Speed Train Floors Using Composite Sandwich Structures
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Approach for Selecting Effective Threshold Values in Ternary State Estimation Using Particle Swarm Optimization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Simulation, Fabrication and Testing of UAV Composite Landing Gear
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Using of the Multilayer Plate Concept in the Calculus of Functionally Graded Plates

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10695; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110695
by Vasile Nastasescu
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10695; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110695
Submission received: 21 September 2022 / Revised: 9 October 2022 / Accepted: 19 October 2022 / Published: 22 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling and Simulation of Composite Materials and Structures)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please refer the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your observations and comments, which we accept as a help to us so that our paper can be published.

We appreciate all your comments, they are correct and represent valuable support for improving our paper, both in form and in content.

In the uploaded file, our answer to each of your comments exist.

Thank you!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have attempted On the Use of the Multilayer Plate Concept in the Calculus of 2 Functionally Graded Plates

 The manuscript needs revision based on following comments and suggestions.

 1.      In Title should be rewritten for better clarifications. Also change the word “Multylayer into Multilayer”

 2.      In Abstract, include quantitative values of key findings instead of descriptive statements.

 3.      Author should highlights novelty of work in the introduction section.

 4.      Also include some more recent relevant literature papers in the introduction sections.

 5.      The manuscript has many typo/grammatical errors. Author need to revise the entire manuscript carefully.  Line No 118: Please check the font size.

In table1   Typo error:  [kg/m3], 3.8.1011, 7.0.1010

 6.  Provide the relevant literature support for selection of radius of 50 [mm], the thickness of 4 [mm] and the distributed load of 5 [MPa].

 7.      In result and discussion, include the scientific finding and justification with relevant literature.

 8.      A conclusion can be rewritten with key findings.

Author Response

Thank you for your observations and comments, which we accept as a help to us so that our paper can be published.

We appreciate all your comments, they are correct and represent valuable support for improving our paper, both in form and in content.

In the uploaded file our answer to each of your comments exist.

Thank you !

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The necessary corrections, modifications and improvements were made in the revised manuscript. The revised manuscript could be accepted as it is.

Back to TopTop