Next Article in Journal
All-Optical Method of Determining Laser Power from the Photomechanical Effect
Next Article in Special Issue
Axial Compression Behavior of Steel Angle-Corrugated Steel Plate-Confined Concrete Columns
Previous Article in Journal
A Study on Finding Partners through Patent Network Analysis of UAM (Urban Air Mobility)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Elasto-Plastic Short Exoskeleton to Improve the Dynamic and Seismic Performance of Frame Structures
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Unified Simplified Capacity Model for Beam-Column Joints into RC Moment Resisting Frame

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10709; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110709
by Giancarlo Ramaglia 1,2, Gian Piero Lignola 1,*, Francesco Fabbrocino 2 and Andrea Prota 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10709; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110709
Submission received: 3 October 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 22 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Design and Analysis for Constructions and Buildings)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript can be accepted after correcting some errors as follows:

1. What are the colors blue, red, black, ... in the pictures 1-2 show, the manuscript needs to be clarified

2. What is the angle symbol in the formulas (2-7), the manuscript needs more explanation.

3. The manuscript needs more explanation of the alpha symbol in the formulas (11-14)

4. Section 3.2: The manuscript needs a specific model drawing to better explain the Failure modes

5. The image quality of Figures 3-9 is very low, it is recommended that the authors redraw it to show more clearly, ensuring the quality of the ISI journal.

6. Why do the max, min values of Tau in the last columns in tables 2-3 do not match the names max, min. The manuscript needs more clarification on these points.

7. The manuscript needs to cite the following articles:

- https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636219849268 

- https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406220964522 

- https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2836763  

- DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7149-2_3 

 

Author Response

The authors thank the reviewer for the comments. Authors improved the manuscript according to all the suggestions. Please see the attachment, column 2

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Notes in the attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The authors thank the reviewer for the comments. Authors improved the manuscript according to all the suggestions. Please see the attachment, column 2

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Incompatibility of the units on both sides of the equations (17)-(19) !! - it was not clarified

The difference between θ and ϑ was not clarified in the figure 1 and 2 and new figure 3.

Author Response

The authors are sorry to have not provided a clear revision according to the reviewer comments. Authors further improved the manuscript according to all the suggestions. Please see the attachment, column 2

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop