Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Response of Rectangular Tunnels Embedded at Various Depths in Spatially Variable Soils
Next Article in Special Issue
The Robotic Intracorporeal Vesuvian Orthotopic Neobladder (VON)—A New Technique for Continent Urinary Diversion: Initial Experience and Description of the Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Wideband Ring-Monopole Flexible Antenna with Stub for WLAN/C-Band/X-Band Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multiparametric MRI Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Eliminates the Systemic Prostate Biopsy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Characteristics of Sepsis or Acute Pyelonephritis Combined with Ureteral Stone in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of Large National Cohort

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10718; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110718
by Francesco Del Giudice 1,2,*,†, Koo Han Yoo 1,†, Sinyeong Lee 1, Jin Kyu Oh 1, Hyuk Jin Cho 1, Sang Youn Kim 1, Gyeong Eun Min 1, Sang Hyub Lee 1, Wansuk Kim 1, Shufeng Li 1,2, Wuran Wei 1, Jianlin Huang 1, David R. Brown 1, Kyle Spradling 1, Satvir Basran 1, Federico Belladelli 1, Riccardo Autorino 3, Savio Domenico Pandolfo 3, Simone Crivellaro 4, Felice Crocetto 5, Matteo Ferro 6, Vincenzo Asero 2, Carlo Maria Scornajenghi 2, Eugenio Bologna 2, Alessandro Sciarra 2, Stefano Salciccia 2, Ettore De Berardinis 2, Gian Piero Ricciuti 2, Stefanie van Uem 1, Simon Conti 1 and Benjamin I. Chung 1add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Reviewer 4:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10718; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110718
Submission received: 26 July 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 19 October 2022 / Published: 22 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Del Giudice and co-authors conducted a retrospective observational cohort-study with the purpose to identify the main characteristics of septic patients with urinary tract obstruction due to urinary stones and analyze risk factors. 

This is an interesting topic, and considering the burden of sepsis on healthcare systems, I believe that the results here described may have a clinical guidance significance.

Therefore, I recommend the Editor consider publishing Del Giudice and co-authors' work.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachement. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This retrospective Analysis explain the risk factors and characteristics of sepsis or APN combined with ureteral stone.

This is useful information and I accept in current format.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

 

Dear Authors,

 I would like to congratulate you on very interesting work. Before recommending it to the further editing process I would like to ask you about developing financial aspect in ‘Results’ section and writing a separate paragraph on it in ‘Discussion’ section as well as adding relevant literature.

 

Best regards.

Author Response

Please see the attachement. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Characteristics of Sepsis or Acute Pyelonephritis Combined 2 with Ureteral Stone in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of Large National Cohort

Summary

This is an interesting retrospective cohort study of the characteristics of sepsis or acute pyelonephritis combined with ureteral stone in the United States. The author reviewed about  467,502 patients from a database. The conclusion is that a history of urinary tract infection and the female gender are the highest individual risk factors for the development of sepsis or APN in patients with ureteral calculi—the high odds ratio of 11.31 for a history of UTI and 2.73 for female gender establishes this fact .

Strength 

·         Very detailed presentation 

·         Statistical analysis is adequate 

·         Robust database – this is the major strength in this paper that gives it scientific soundness

Weakness

 

·         Lacks originality. The conclusion is already a well-known fact. The paper is just to buttress an already-established fact. I will suggest that the authors make a case for the uniqueness of this research in terms of the conclusion drawn from the data.

Author Response

Please see the attachement. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop