Next Article in Journal
Modeling and Experimental Study of the Dual Cylinder Fluid Inerter
Previous Article in Journal
Instability of High Liquid Limit Soil Slope for the Expressway Induced by Rainfall
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Improved Method of Polyp Detection Using Custom YOLOv4-Tiny

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10856; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110856
by Mukhtorov Doniyorjon 1,2, Rakhmonova Madinakhon 1, Muksimova Shakhnoza 1 and Young-Im Cho 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10856; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110856
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 22 October 2022 / Published: 26 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article “An improvement of Wireless Endoscopic Image Detection using YOLO-Inception-Res-A” by Doniyorjon et al. reports a new approach for Wireless Endoscopic Image detection and localization, which can enhance the accuracy and speed of the detection. Here are some issues to be addressed for the further improvement of the manuscript:

1) The authors should carefully check the writing of the manuscript. For example, in abstract, it is stated that “We also present a new innovative approach for …”. It is better not to use “new” and “innovative” here. The authors should demonstrate the data and facts. The readers will make the judgement whether the proposed method is really new or innovative.

2) The display of Figure 3 is terrible and unclear. It is not a good choice to use the green and blue background.

3) The authors should check the typo and grammar errors throughout the manuscript. For example, in “Author Contributions”: who “wrote and developed with python environment”?

4) The current title contains too much abbreviations, which is not friendly to the readers. The authors should consider revising the title.

5) The format of all the references should be checked and revised.

Author Response

Dear review, I attached the file with the response to the comments, if you are not satisfied with the revised final version of the paper, please provide us with comments on unclear parts. Thank You!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

please find attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear review, I attached the file with the response to the comments, if you are not satisfied with the revised final version of the paper, please provide us with comments on unclear parts. Thank You!

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop