Local Allergic Rhinitis: A Different Rhinitis Endotype? Literature Overview

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article is rich in content and update many references. So I suggest that editor accept the article. If the article need to revise again and I like to review the revision article again.

Author Response

Thank you for your comment

Reviewer 2 Report

Overall, I think it's a well-written article that will appeal to readers.

A few typos need to be corrected.

I believe that if the authors also define atopy, it will be beneficial for the readers.

The blanks for LAR and NAR under SPT in Table 1 need to be filled in appropriately.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for his/her precious advice, we have rewritten some sentences.

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors,

Thanks for manuscript.

1-Abstract is more like a part of introduction and not an abstract and findings of manuscript.

2- many parts are seems like copy of just one manuscript like line 110 that clinical manifestation of LAR mentioned as a women with symptoms.

Author Response

Thank you for your advice, we have rewritten some sentences according to your suggestions.

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for your precious advice, we hope to have improved the text according to your suggestions。

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 5 Report

Thank you for giving me this opportunity. I read the text and I found it a comprehensive review. Yet, I have problem with the following issues:

·       Should there be any washout period before NAC? If yes, for what drugs and how long?

·       “CR” on line 115 should be written in complete form if used for the first time in the text.

·       There are a couple of grammatical and punctuation mistakes in the text such as:

-        “A” is redundant on line 21.

-        “Were” must be changed to “was” on line 316.

-        “and” before “AR” seems to be redundant on line 328.

-        The sentence on line 340 must be edited grammatically.

-        The sentence on line 384 should be corrected in terms of grammar and punctuation.

Author Response

Thank you for your suggestions, we have rewritten some sentences.

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors

still abstract need revision and should just focus on lAR and definite definition and difference with other types of AR.

other parts also should more focus on LAR

Author Response

Dear Editor,

I thank the reviewer once again for his valuable advice. Hoping to have improved the text we have rewritten the abstract and focused more on the topic of the review, the LAR.

Best regards

Elena Cantone

Reviewer 4 Report

The revised version of the review is more comprehensive and thoughts are in order.

Author Response

Dear Editor,

Once again I thank the reviewer for his valuable advice. We did a spell check.

Best Regards

Round 3

Reviewer 3 Report

Thanks for changes just minor English edit need