Next Article in Journal
Mobile Cyber Forensic Investigations of Web3 Wallets on Android and iOS
Previous Article in Journal
Sudden Event Prediction Based on Event Knowledge Graph
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 21
10.3390/app122111199
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Method of Predicting Critical Derailment Speed and Analysis of Derailment Process

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 11199; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111199
by Ruodan Yu 1, He Ma 1, Jun Zhang 1,* and Yan Niu 2
Reviewer 1:
Nam-Hyoung Lim
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 11199; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111199
Submission received: 17 September 2022 / Revised: 12 October 2022 / Accepted: 2 November 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. The thesis title needs to be corrected.

critical speed of curve derailment --> Critical Derailment Speed running on Curved track

2. Uniformity of terminology throughout the paper.

progressive trial calculation method ; progressive trial method

root locus method ; root trajectory method

limit cycle method ; limit loop method ; limit ring method

3. Correct the terms in the table 2.

line --> alignment

Linear -->alignment

Ultra High --> Cant

4. What is the physical significance of the results in Figure 5? And in root trajectory and  limit loop method, it is necessary to explain exactly whether the curve condition is not taken into account.

5. Please describe the author's argument while quantitatively comparing the disadvantages of limit loop method described at the top of page 6 with the method proposed in this paper.

6. There are no research results in the paper to support the first conclusion.

7. It is difficult to judge that conclusions 2 and 3 explain the complex process of derailment.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for carefully reviewing and reflecting the reviewers' opinions.

Please consider the following:

1. The title needs to be revised to represent the results of this paper. The title of the currently revised version is very lacking in meaning.

2. There are English sentences that are difficult to understand. Please seek professional help. I recommend editing with the help of a technical writer.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

All comments of review round 1 have been included in the revised version sufficiently.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop