Next Article in Journal
Origin and Composition of Exosomes as Crucial Factors in Designing Drug Delivery Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Aflatoxin B1 Binding by Lactic Acid Bacteria in Protein-Rich Plant Material Fermentation
Previous Article in Journal
An Established Theory of Digital Twin Model for Tunnel Construction Safety Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anaerobic Fermentation of Silage from the Above-Ground Biomass of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) and Maize (Zea mayse L.) as a New and Promising Input Raw Material for Biogas Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metabolic Profiling of Streptomyces sp. Strain ess_amH1 Isolated from Apis mellifera yemintica’s Gut Microbiome, and Its Anticancer Activity against Breast Cancer (MCF7) and Hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) Cell Lines, as Well as Antimicrobial Activity

by
Nouf Mohammed Al-Enazi
1,
Neveen Abdel-Raouf
1,2,
Reem Mohammed Alharbi
3 and
Essam Nageh Sholkamy
4,*
1
Department of Biology, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
2
Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Salah Salem Street, Beni-Suef 62511, Egypt
3
Biology Department, Science College, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin 39524, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 12257; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312257
Submission received: 2 November 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 26 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022

Abstract

:
Streptomyces is recognized as a crucial generator of bioactive molecules that benefit humanity, such as antibiotics and other medications. The Streptomyces strain obtained from the gut of Apis mellifera yemintica was utilized in this investigation to screen for antibacterial and antiproliferative activities using secondary metabolites. On the basis of morphological and molecular identification, the isolated strain ess_amH1 was confirmed as Streptomyces sp., and phylogenetic tree construction revealed 96% sequence similarity with Streptomyces griseus. The ethyl acetate solvent extract generated from the strain ess_amH1 demonstrated high antibacterial activity against ATCC bacterial pathogens, as well as pathogenic yeast, according to the disc diffusion assay. The ethyl acetate solvent extract also induced dose-dependent cytotoxicity in breast cancer and hepatocarcinoma cell lines, with IC50 concentrations at 50 and 75 µg/mL, respectively. The findings confirm that the Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 isolated from a competitive symbiotic habitat, i.e., the gut of A. mellifera yemintica, produces promising bioactive chemicals.

1. Introduction

Actinomycetes are a unique collection of aerobic unicellular, branching, and Gram-positive bacteria that can be found in an extensive variety of habitats, such as soil, warm water, and marine deposits, and they have hereditary genetic material with a 70% GC content [1]. They include important taxa such as Micromonospora, Nocardia, and Streptomyces, which have large genomes and can produce a variety of secondary metabolites, antimicrobials, industrially relevant enzymes, anticancer materials, helpful metabolites, and insecticides. Furthermore, Micromonospora, Saccharopolyspora, Amycolatopsis, and Actinoplane all play a role in the delivery of commercially important compounds, including anti-infection agents supplied by Streptomyces in over 80% of cases [2,3]. Hence, Streptomycetes is a particularly well known basis of natural products, especially antibiotics. Accordingly, the Streptomyces variety is given enormous importance since it is unique, has a high metabolic generation rate, and has the ability to recycle organic matter, as well as destroy chitin, lignocelluloses, and other materials [4]. Generally, Streptomyces lives in groups with various microbes in different environments. This link could start a chain of events that lead to the formation of new natural products and, thus, chemical defense of the supplying bacteria and fungi [5].
Microbial illnesses are spreading at an alarming rate, causing a severe risk to human health; following the rise in drug-resistant microbes, the mandate for new antibiotics is growing by the day [6]. Despite the lavishness of potential sources of antimicrobial agents, soil-derived Streptomyces remains the most important repository, leaving other alternative bases such as the insect microbiome and marine microbial environments to produce novel antibiotics, pharmaceuticals, and bioactive compounds [7]. Bioactive compounds are the microbe’s method of communication, regulating the interaction and resistance within and between species. The ecology and chemistry of bioactive substances describe the essential interplay among the microbial population, host, and environment within microbiomes [8]. As a result, researching the chemistry of particular bioactive compounds found inside host microbial populations has become a new antimicrobial drug development paradigm that is quickly gaining traction [9].
Topical antibiotics have recently been discovered in the microbes of a range of entities, including sea squirts and humans; however, defensive symbioses, in which microbial symbionts produce antibiotics to defend against opportunistic and specialized infections, are an auspicious source of new antimicrobials. This defensive symbiosis, which is well established in insects such as the solitary digger wasp, southern pine beetle, and fungus-growing ant systems, represents a potential solution to our need for antimicrobial compounds released by these taxa to prevent infectious disease [10,11,12,13]. Over five million insect species have been identified worldwide, with the orders of Hymenoptera and Coleoptera occupying practically every terrestrial niche. Insects produce chemical reactions that regulate and maintain the variety of their ecological partnerships. Hundreds of insect–Streptomyces interactions, for example, have created more than 10 unique natural antibacterial chemicals [14].
However, very little information has been recorded on the occurrence of Streptomyces spp. that produce antimicrobial and antiproliferative compounds from the gut microbiome of the insect A. mellifera yemintica under the order of Hymenoptera. Streptomyces found in such uncharted territory can be considered wild species with natural diversity. Therefore, they may be a rich source of various beneficial metabolites. Moreover, due to nature’s limitless diversity, Streptomyces are predicted to continue being a source of natural compounds with features of interest in medicine and agriculture. Therefore, in this study, we were interested in investigating the morphological and molecular characteristics of Streptomyces spp. attained from the gut of A. mellifera yemintica and their capacity to develop natural products for therapeutic applications under various physiological circumstances.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

A. mellifera yemintica insects were collected from the botanical garden at King Saudi University’s agriculture college, Saudi Arabia. The target insect was identified by Prof. Mostafa Sharaf (professor of entomology) in a laboratory. The samples were preserved in sterile tubes in a deep freezer (−20 °C) until further processing.

2.2. Isolation of Actinomycetes from A. mellifera Yemintica

The insects were sterilized with ethanol alcohol 70% to kill all microbes on their surface. The gut was extracted from the insects using sterile tweezers and ground in 3 mL of normal saline solution, serially diluted from 10−9 to 10−1 in 0.85% NaCl, and shaken for 10 min with an orbital shaker at 250 rpm. Then, 50 µL of the dilution (10−5) was withdrawn from the insect-soaked saline solution, spread onto SCA (starch casein agar) treated with streptomycin at a concentration of 50 mg/L, and incubated at 30 °C in aerobic conditions until branched filamentous colonies and aerial mycelia developed. After the incubation period, particular colonies were sub-cultured and purified using the streaking method. Among the other strains, ess_amH1 was selected and further maintained on ISP-2 medium by periodical subculture. The culture was kept in glycerol stock for further studies.

2.3. Morphological Characteristics of Streptomyces sp. Strain ess_amH1

Morphological and physiological characterizations were based on International Streptomyces Project Methods [15]. The strain ess_amH1 was inoculated on different standard culture media of ISP-3 (oatmeal agar), ISP-6 (peptone yeast extract iron agar), ISP-5 (glycerol asparagine agar), ISP-2 (yeast malt extract agar), ISP-4 (inorganic salt starch agar), ISP-7 (tyrosine agar), starch casein agar, and Czapek Dox agar for the observation of morphological characters [16]. The mycelium structure, color, and arrangement of conidiophores and arthrospore on the mycelium were observed through an oil immersion lens (100×). Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze the spore surface morphology. Using the coverslip culture method, the morphology of spore and sporulation structures was analyzed microscopically. The organism was identified on the basis of its perceived structure according to the project guidelines of Shirling and Gottlieb [15].

2.4. Biochemical Characteristics of Streptomyces sp. Strain ess_amH1

The isolated strain was tested on ISP basal medium with 1% of different carbon and nitrogen sources. The findings of biochemical tests including nitrate and nitrite reduction matched Bergey’s manual of decisive bacteriology. Enzymatic activity of the strain was studied for the enzymes listed as Amylase, DNase, Catalase, H2S production (cystathionine β-synthetase), Hydrolysis of esculin (esculinase), Protease, Lecithin hydrolysis (Lecithinase), Lipid hydrolysis (lipase), Urea hydrolysis (urease), Nitrate reduction (nitrate reductases) and Chitinase according to methods of Holding and Collee (1971) [17]. The development of the strain in different conditions (NaCl concentration (1%, 4%, 7%, 10%, and 14%), pH (5, 7, and 10), temperature (4 °C, 26 °C, 30 °C, 37 °C, and 45 °C)) and antibiotic resistance were tested.

2.5. Molecular Characterization of Strain

The isolated strain was cultured in ISP 2 broth, and complete DNA was isolated using Sambrook et al. (1989) [18]. PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene was carried with forward primer 27F and reverse primer 1492R. Amplification was carried out for 32 cycles at 95 °C for 5 min, 95 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 2 min with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. nBLAST was used to compare the 16S rRNA gene with homologous sequences of the Streptomyces genus obtained from NCBI. Later, MSA (multiple sequence alignment), and phylogenetic tree analyses were performed using the MEGA 7 program, with the maximum likelihood approach used to construct the phylogenetic tree.

2.6. Extraction of Secondary Metabolites from Streptomyces sp. Strain ess_amH1

In the ISP-2 broth, 2 L of culture was inoculated and maintained at 30 °C in a rotary shaker for 7 days. The cultured broth was centrifuged for 20 min at 5000 rpm at 4 °C. After collecting the supernatant, an equal amount of ethyl acetate was poured and stirred at periodic intervals. The solvent phase was extracted, and the solvent was evaporated using a rotary vacuum evaporator.

2.7. GC–MS Analysis

The EtoAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 was completely dissolved in the organic solvent and analyzed by GC–MS on a GC-Clarus 500 (Perkin Elmer, column type-Elite-5 ms (30 m × 250), detector: mass detector: turbo mass gold-Perkin Elmer, software: Tubomass 5.4.2). The identification of chemical constituents was based on matching their recorded mass spectra with those attained from the NIST (National Institute and Standard Technology), version-year 2005 [19].

2.8. Antimicrobial Activity of the Extract of Streptomyces sp. Strain ess_amH1 against Bacterial and Fungal Pathogens (Disc Diffusion Assay)

The disc diffusion assay was used to determine the antibacterial and antifungal activity of the solvent extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 by following de Souza Constantino et al.’s (2018) method [20]. Then, 1.0 mL of individual bacterial cultures such as Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Salmonella typhi (ATCC 14028), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), as well as a fungal culture, i.e., Candida albicans, were mixed with 300 mL of nutrient agar medium and transferred into the 90 mm petri dishes. Then, sterilized Whatman no. 3 filter paper discs (6 mm size) were soaked in different beakers containing various concentrations of solvent extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1. The concentrations of 5, 10, 40, and 80 µg per disc and 20, 40, 80, 200, and 400 µg per disc were used for antibacterial activity and antifungal activity respectively. Soaked discs were taken out with sterilized forceps, air-dried, and located on the Petri dishes with different microbes. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The control was carried out by soaking the paper disc in ethyl acetate and placing it against each of the test microbes to ensure that ethyl acetate did not have any antibacterial/antifungal activity; streptomycin (50 µg/disc)/fluconazole (100 µg/disc) was used as a positive control. The assay was repeated three times. The zone of inhibition (mm) produced by the solvent extract was used to measure antibacterial and antifungal activity.

2.9. SEM Examination

The antibacterial effects of the EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 against the K. pnemoniae morphology were observed by SEM. The bacterial samples were prepared following Shukla’s (2015) method [21].

2.10. Antiproliferative Activity of the Crude Extract

The MTT assay was used to study the antiproliferative activity of solvent extract of Streptomyces sp. on human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and human liver cancer cells (Hep-G2) [22]. The cancer cells (1 × 104 cells/well) seeded in 96-well plates and then treated for 24 h to seven different doses of crude extract (0, 3, 6, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 µg/mL). Furthermore, for comparison, a negative/vehicle control and a positive control (doxorubicin 100 µg/mL) were used. After the required incubation time, 10 µL of MTT was added, before incubating for 3 h at room temperature. Finally, the solution was removed from the plate wells, and each well was completed with 100 µL of cell-culture-grade DMSO. The optical density (OD) of each well at 570 nm was measured in microplate reader (Synergy; BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). The proportion of cytotoxicity was calculated in comparison to untreated cells. The assay was conducted in triplicate. The inhibitory concentration (IC50) was determined using the following formula:
P e r c e n t a g e   o f   c e l l   v i a b i l i t y = M e a n   t e s t   O p t i c a l   D e n s i t y M e a n   O p t i c a l   D e n s i t y   o f   c o n t r o l × 100

2.11. Statistical Analysis

The experiments were conducted using a completely randomized technique, with the findings presented as the mean ± SD. For statistical analysis, the SPSS software package 16.0 edition was employed (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way ANOVA (post hoc Tukey’s test) was performed to discern the statistical difference in antibacterial and anticancer studies.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Identification of the Strain ess_amH1

The gut microbiome of the insect A. mellifera yementica yielded four separate colonies of actinomycetes. According to the preliminary screening (Figure 1A–C), the strain ess_amH1 had more microbial activity against S. aureus, S. typhi, S. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumonia, C. albicans, and Aspergillus niger and grew more quickly than the other three colonies; hence, it was preferred for further analysis to identify the morphology, growth, and biochemical traits. The growth patterns, amount of growth, aerial mycelia color, substrate mycelia color, pigmentation, and melanin production of the selected isolate were observed on various ISP media. The morphological characteristics of strain ess_amH1 revealed that the strain has Streptomyces-like traits. Strain ess_amH1 generated well-developed, branched substrate hyphae, and aerial mycelia on ISP-2, ISP-4, and starch casein agar media, according to observations (Figure 2A–C). The cultural characteristics of strain ess_amH1 are shown in Table 1. Strain ess_amH1 grew well on ISP-2, ISP-4, ISP-6, and ISP-7, moderately on ISP-5, and minimally on Czapek’s agar medium. The strain ess_amH1 produced white and light-white aerial and substrate mycelia, respectively. Oily yellow pigmentation was observed only on ISP-2, and melanin production was not observed in any medium. Both light and scanning electron microscopic investigations of the sporophore morphology showed that the strain had a rectus-flexibilis type of spore chain (Figure 3A,B).
The growth and biochemical traits of the isolate listed in Table 2. Physiological characteristics showed that the ideal temperature for growth of ess_amH1 was 30 °C; however, they showed fair growth at 26 °C and 37 °C. The optimal pH for development of the strain was pH 7. The isolates tolerated salt concentrations up to 4% and grew optimally in 0–1% NaCl (Table 2).
The strain ess_amH1 produced extracellular enzymes such as amylase, protease, chitinase, and catalase. It also produced hydrolytic enzymes to hydrolyze esculin, lipid, nitrate, and urea (Table 3). The isolate was capable of exploiting fructose, sucrose, D-galactose, D-xylose, and citrate as carbon sources and L-cysteine, L-valine, and L-phenylalanine as a nitrogen sources (Table 4). Furthermore, the strain ess_amH1 was found to be sensitive to the antibiotics gentamicin, penicillin G, rifampicin, vancomycin, colistin sulphate, aztreonam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin and resistant to erythromycin, kanamycin, amikacin, chloramphenicol, imipenem, and tetracycline (Table 5).

3.2. Molecular Identification of the Strain ess_amH1

The 16S rRNA sequence of strain ess_amH1 (Query Length: 1491 nucleotides) was determined to determine the molecular level relationship with other reference Streptomyces species in the NCBI GenBank database. The results show that strain ess_amH1 is a member of the Streptomyces genus, and NCBI nBLAST analysis revealed 100% sequence homology in terms of percentage identity with Streptomyces griseus isolate AT1NF9 (query length: 1419 nucleotides, Accession No: LT221172.1), but only 95% in terms of query cover. Strain ess_amH-1 is 96% genetically related to Streptomyces griseus, according to the phylogenetic analysis (Figure 4), and the actinobacterial isolate was identified as Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 according to morphological, biochemical, and molecular characterizations.

3.3. GC–MS Analysis of Strain ess_amH1

GC–MS was used to examine the natural products present in the EtoAc extract of the ess_amH1 strain and test for the existence of active chemicals. The NIST14 library was used to identify the molecular weight, structure, area percentage, and retention time (RT) of the natural compounds present in the extract. Fatty acids, phenols, aldehydes, alkaloids, and other chemicals were found at good to moderate quantities. Vital compounds found in the ethyl acetate extract of ess_amH1 isolate were E-2-decenal with RT = 8.9 min, 5-eicosene with RT = 11.4, hexadecanone with RT = 15.3, cyclohexane with RT = 16.2, pentadecanone with RT = 16.4, bis(3,5,5-trimethylhexyl) ether with RT = 17.9, benzenedicarboxylic acid with RT = 19.8, octacosane with RT = 22, and dodecane with RT = 31.6. The biological activities of the compounds are listed in Table 6. The chromatogram of the ess_amH1 isolate revealed the relative concentration of the components (Figure 5). Each peak’s height is relative to the amount of compound in the extract.

3.4. Antimicrobial Activity of the Strain ess_amH1

The antimicrobial activity of solvent extract of ess_amH1 is presented in Figure 6. The results demonstrated that varying doses of ess_amH1 solvent extract prompted a zone of inhibition in a dose-dependent manner (Table 7). The highest ZOI (zone of inhibition) was observed in S. aureus at (18 mm) at 80 µg, followed by K. pneumoniae (17.5 mm) and S. pneumoniae (17 mm) when compared to streptomycin’s inhibition zone of 20 mm. The least activity was perceived in S. aureus (7 mm) at 5 µg. Furthermore, the solvent extract of ess_amH1 was also shown to produce anticandidal agents against Candida albicans in a dose-dependent manner (Table 7). The highest ZOI (21 mm) was observed in 400 µg when compared to fluconazole with an inhibition zone of 23 mm. Means ± SEs followed by different letters (a–e) within the same row indicate a significant difference (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05).

Cell Morphology by SEM Examination

Overall, the highest antibacterial activity was observed against K. pneumoniae. Therefore, here, we study the alterations in the outer membrane of the K. pneumoniae using the highest concentration of EtOAc extract; however, the control cells did not agonize the impairment (Figure 7).

3.5. Antiproliferative Activity of the EtoAc Extract of ess_amH1

The cytotoxicity of the EtoAc extract of ess_amH1 against MCF-7 (breast cancer) and Hep-G2 (hepatocarcinoma cells) cells increased dose-dependently (Figure 8). The measured IC50 concentration was 50 µg/mL and 75 µg/mL against MCF-7 and Hep-G2 cell lines, respectively. This shows that breast cancer cells are likely to be sensitive toward the treatment of EtoAc extract of ess_amH1 strain. The means ± SE followed by different letters (a–e) within the same row indicate a significant difference (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). In comparison to the cytotoxicity activity of doxorubicin against MCF-7 and Hep-G2 cells (42 and 77.2%, respectively) at 100 µg/mL, ess_amH1 extract had strong anticancer activity at 100 µg/mL.

4. Discussion

Insects have a remarkable ability to live in an extensive range of niches and are constantly threatened by predatory bugs, parasites, and entomopathogens. Symbiotic microorganisms play a critical part in the insect’s defense system against intruders, as well as their ability to survive in hard settings [14]. Insect symbionts have recently been mentioned in a number of studies, and their compounds have been labeled as “potential antimicrobials”. The identified compounds involved in the defensive insect–microbe symbiosis highlight the antibacterial latency of insect-related Streptomyces bacteria. As a result, researchers are becoming more attentive in insect symbionts as a basis of novel active chemicals [41].
The Actinomycetales order, which includes Streptomyces, has usually been identified for its production of antimicrobial compounds under active symbiotic conditions. So far, approximately <3% of its antimicrobial compounds have been identified, signifying the large undiscovered majority [42]. These isolated Streptomyces are claimed to have greater antibacterial activity than Streptomyces strains isolated from soil or plant [14]. These outcomes shed light on why Streptomyces strains are so widely used in screening. Actinomycetes are found in the gut microbiome of insects and widely spread in nature. Many studies have paid attention to the synthesis of a range of compounds generated by gut Actinomycetes. Isolation of Actinomycetes from the insect gut habitat is more difficult than isolation from normal environments, due to the availability of limited bacterial communities. Most commonly, the microbiome of insects under the order of Hymenoptera has been examined for antibacterial activity. Fungus-eating ants have received more attention for the search of microbes producing antibiotics, although the order of Hymenoptera includes ants, bees, and wasps. Bees, which contain some of the smallest bacterial populations of any insect, are frequently the subject of research [43], and the knowledge that honey has antibacterial properties has driven microbiota studies. Isolating bioactive metabolite-producing actinomycetes from competitive habitats such as the gut of A. mellifera yemintica is a vital arena of investigation in view of the existing drug resistance dilemma and the hunt for novel antimicrobials. The strain ess_amH1 from this investigation was categorized in the genus Streptomyces on the basis of the improvement of aerial or reproductive mycelia, as well as sporulation on solid media, according to macroscopic and microscopic examination. It was coenocytic in the vegetative mycelium. These species develop filamentous, densely branched mycelia with a net-like shape. Streptomyces species can be identified from the existence of characteristic aerial mycelium on top of substrate growth. The size of the aerial hyphae was discovered to be variable.
Additionally, growth conditions and biochemical properties of the isolate ess_amH1 assist in the identification of biotechnological characteristics. The carbon and nitrogen supplies in the medium most likely influence the antimicrobial production. According to a previous study, 0.55% glucose and 0.835% yeast extract in the medium produced the most secondary metabolites with the greatest antibacterial activity in Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 [44,45]. In this study, the optimum medium for antibacterial production of strain ess_amH1 was confirmed as ISP-2 broth. ISP-2 medium is made up of simple carbon bases such as glucose, as well as organic nitrogen sources such as malt and yeast extract, which can help with growth, pigment formation, and antibacterial agent production [26]. Physiological characteristics of the strain ess_amH1 at 30 °C, pH 7, and 1% NaCl exhibited optimal growth, which is similar to other reported Streptomyces strains isolated from soil [42,45,46]. The enzymatic activity of strain ess_amH1 (Table 3) showed that the strain is capable of producing a variety of enzymes that catalyze macromolecules such as starch, protein, lipid, and nucleic acid. Furthermore, the strain can produce hydrolytic enzymes against esculin, nitrate, and urea, whereas the production of catalase enzymes proves the capability of the strain to produce antioxidant enzymes. The utilization of carbon and nitrogen sources, as well as the development of antimicrobials and industrially significant enzymes, provides interesting leads for further research of the isolate ess_amH1. The significance of incorporating various antibiotics into the medium in the selective isolation of the strain has been identified [4,45,46,47]. Furthermore, the 16S rRNA sequence analysis showed that the strain ess_amH1 was related to the genus Streptomyces. The phylogenetic analysis revealed 90% similarity of the strain ess_amH1 with antibiotics producing Streptomyces sp. such as Streptomyces griseus isolate AT1NF9 and Streptomyces avermitilis isolate HL3RP7. Although typical phenotypic characteristics of our strain ess_amH1 were similar, other aspects differed such as the color characteristics of the aerial mycelium and nitrate reduction [48].
GC–MS analysis of ethyl acetate extract of ess_amH1 strain revealed its antibacterial, antifungal, antitumor, and antioxidant activities, as shown in Table 6 [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. As Actinomycetes produce chemicals that are useful against multidrug-resistant infections under a variability of development settings, the crude extract extracted from the strain ess_amH1 also demonstrated broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against Gram-positive (S. aureus and S. pneumoniae) and Gram-negative bacteria (P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae). Despite the differences in cell-wall properties, the compounds in the solvent extract could act equally against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria. The low-molecular-weight antimicrobial compounds present in the extract help hydrophilic, low-molecular-weight molecules diffuse into the outer layer of Gram-negative bacteria, because the hydrophilic channels produced by specific porin proteins help the hydrophilic low-molecular-weight molecules diffuse into the outer layer of Gram-negative bacteria, whereas peptidoglycan polymers are relatively inert [47].
Furthermore, it was discovered that the crude extract had considerable activity against Candida albicans. Since antibiotics are notoriously produced by Streptomyces griseus and Streptomyces avermitilis, along with an extensive array of microbes, it appears that the comparable strain ess_amH1 is also capable of producing an extensive variety of bioactive molecules to overcome bacterial and fungal growth [1,46]. The antiproliferative activity of the EtOAc extract against the breast cell line and hepatocarcinoma cell lines proved that the extract might possess strong anticancer properties. The cytotoxic properties of the extract might increase the destructive signals that alter cell endurance and lead to death via apoptosis. Antitumor compounds existing in the EtOAc extract were accountable for the decrease in cancer cell viability [31,32,33,34,35,36]. As a result, they could be developed as anticancer therapies for human use, as cytotoxicity testing is an important stage in developing new therapeutic medications for clinical use. Further studies on purification of natural compounds from the extract can elaborate the specific role and mechanism behind the antimicrobial and antitumor activity of the specific compounds identified from the crude extract.

5. Conclusions

The strain ess_amH1 confirmed as Streptomyces sp. showed optimum growth at pH 7 at 30 °C and was capable of tolerating 1% NaCl. The EtOAc extract of the strain displayed antimicrobial and antiproliferative activity, indicating the existence of strong bioactive metabolites. More research is required to classify and study the efficiency of bioactive substances. The current outcomes of the study suggest that the gut microbiome can be seen as an alternative source for isolating secondary metabolite-producing Streptomyces from a competitive symbiotic habitat, and that bioactive chemicals isolated from the ess_amH1 strain can be employed as drugs.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conceptualization and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by E.N.S., R.M.A. and N.M.A.-E. The first draft of the manuscript was written by E.N.S. and N.A.-R., and the manuscript was reviewed and edited by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University under the research project PSAU-2022/01/19960.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Emerson, R.; Procópio, D.L.; Reis, I.; Kassawara, M.; Lúcio, J.; Azevedo, D.; Magali, J.; Araújo, D. Review article Antibiotics produced by Streptomyces. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 16, 466–471. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kafilzadeh, F.; Dehdari, F. Amylase activity of aquatic actinomycetes isolated from the sediments of mangrove forests in south of Iran. Egypt J. Aquat. Res. 2015, 41, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kumari, N.; Menghani, E.; Mithal, R. GCMS analysis of compounds extracted from actinomycetes AIA6 isolates and study of its antimicrobial efficacy. Ind. J. Chem. Tech. 2019, 26, 4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Higginbotham, S.J.; Murphy, C.D. Identification and characterisation of a Streptomyces sp. isolate exhibiting activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 165, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wiese, J.; Imhoff, J.F. Marine bacteria and fungi as promising source for new antibiotics. Drug Dev. Res. 2019, 80, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Abdelmohsen, U.R.; Balasubramanian, S.; Oelschlaeger, T.A.; Grkovic, T.; Pham, N.B.; Quinn, R.J.; Hentschel, U. Potential of marine natural products against drug-resistant fungal, viral, and parasitic infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e30–e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Clardy, J.; Fischbach, M.A.; Currie, C.R. The natural history of antibiotics. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, R437–R441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhalnina, K.; Zengler, K.; Newman, D.; Northen, T.R. Need for laboratory ecosystems to unravel the structures and functions of soil microbial communities mediated by chemistry. MBio 2018, 9, e01175-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zipperer, A.; Konnerth, M.C.; Laux, C.; Berscheid, A.; Janek, D.; Weidenmaier, C.; Burian, M.; Schilling, N.A.; Slavetinsky, C.; Marschal, M.; et al. Human commensals producing a novel antibiotic impair pathogen colonization. Nature 2016, 535, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Currie, C.R.; Wong, B.; Stuart, A.E.; Schultz, T.R.; Rehner, S.A.; Mueller, U.G.; Sung, G.-H.; Spatafora, J.W.; Straus, N.A. Ancient tripartite coevolution in the attine ant-microbe symbiosis. Science 2003, 299, 386–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kroiss, J.; Kaltenpoth, M.; Schneider, B.; Schwinger, M.G.; Hertweck, C.; Maddula, R.K.; Strohm, E.; Svatos, A. Symbiotic streptomycetes provide antibiotic combination prophylaxis for wasp offspring. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 261–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oh, D.C.; Poulsen, M.; Currie, C.R.; Clardy, J. Dentigerumycin: A bacterial mediator of an ant-fungus symbiosis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 391–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Scott, J.J.; Oh, D.C.; Yuceer, M.C.; Klepzig, K.D.; Clardy, J.; Currie, C.R. Bacterial protection of beetle-fungus mutualism. Science 2008, 322, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Chevrette, M.G.; Carlson, C.M.; Ortega, H.E.; Thomas, C.; Ananiev, G.E.; Barns, K.J.; Book, A.J.; Cagnazzo, J.; Carlos, C.; Flanigan, W.; et al. The antimicrobial potential of Streptomyces from insect microbiomes. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Shirling, E.B.; Gottlieb, D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int. J. Syst. Bact. 1966, 16, 313–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mohanasrinivasan, V.; SriramKalyan, P.; Ipsita, N.; Subathradevi, C.; Selvarajan, E.; Suganthi, V.; Jemimah, N.S. Fermentative production of extracellular pigment from Streptomyces coelicolor MSIS1. Res. J. Biotech. 2013, 8, 31–41. [Google Scholar]
  17. Holding, A.J.; Collee, J.G. Routine Biochemical Tests. Methods Microbiol. 1971, 6, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sasikala, K.; Chandra Mohan, S. Total phenolic, Flavanoid contents and GC-MS analysis of canthium coromandelicum leaves extract. Int. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2014, 6, 379–381. [Google Scholar]
  20. de Souza Constantino, L.; da Rosa Guimarães, T.; de Oliveira, S.Q.; Bianco, É.M.; de Souza Pessoa, L.G.; Michels, M.; Schenkel, E.P.; Pizzol, F.D.; Reginatto, F.H. TSH fraction from Petromica citrina: A potential marine natural product for the treatment of sepsis by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 1759–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shukla, S. Studying antimicrobial-induced morphostructural damage of bacteria by scanning electron microscope. Bangladesh J. Pharmacol. 2015, 10, 870–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Elmaidomy, A.H.; Mohyeldin, M.M.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Hassan, H.M.; Amin, E.; Rateb, M.E.; Hetta, M.H.; El Sayed, K.A. Acylated Iridoids and Rhamnopyranoses from Premna odorata (Lamiaceae) as Novel Mesenchymal–Epithelial Transition Factor Receptor Inhibitors for the Control of Breast Cancer. Phytother. Res. 2017, 31, 1546–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dembitsky, V.M. Bioactive cyclobutane-containing alkaloids. J. Nat. Med. 2008, 62, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shoaib, M. Synthesis, Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties of Cyclohexane Tosyloxyimine Derivative. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 4, 000150. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reddy, D.N.; Al-Rajab, A.J. Chemical composition, antibacterial and antifungal activities of Ruta graveolens L. volatile oils. Cogent Chem. 2016, 2, 1220055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bisignano, G.; Laganà, M.G.; Trombetta, D.; Arena, S.; Nostro, A.; Uccella, N.; Mazzanti, G.; Saija, A. In vitro antibacterial activity of some aliphatic aldehydes from Olea europaea L. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 198, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Caboni, P.; Ntalli, N.G.; Aissani, N.; Cavoski, I.; Angioni, A. Nematicidal activity of (E, E)-2,4-decadienal and (E)-2-decenal from Ailanthus altissima against Meloidogyne javanica. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 1146–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Trombetta, D.; Saija, A.; Bisignano, G.; Arena, S.; Caruso, S.; Mazzanti, G.; Castelli, F. Study on the mechanisms of the antibacterial action of some plant α,β-unsaturated aldehydes. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 35, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, L.; Wu, J.Z.; Han, T.; Cao, T.; Rahman, K.; Qin, L.P. Chemical composition, antifungal and antitumor properties of ether extracts of Scapania verrucosa Heeg. and its endophytic fungus Chaetomium fusiforme. Molecules 2008, 13, 2114–2125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Negi, K.; Tewari, S.D.; Chaturvedi, P. Antibacterial activity of marchantia papillata raddi subsp. Grossibarba (Steph.) Bischl. Against staphylococcus aureus. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2018, 17, 763–769. [Google Scholar]
  31. Khaled, J.M.; Alharbi, N.S.; Mothana, R.A.; Kadaikunnan, S.; Alobaidi, A.S. Biochemical Profile by GC–MS of Fungal Biomass Produced from the Ascospores of Tirmania nivea as a Natural Renewable Resource. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsukuda, Y.; Mizuhara, N.; Usuki, Y.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Ogita, A.; Tanaka, T.; Fujita, K. Structure–activity relationships of antifungal phenylpropanoid derivatives and their synergy with n-dodecanol and fluconazole. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 74, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Babar, A.G. Antifungal activity and investigation of bioactive compounds of marine intertidal bivalve Gafrarium divaricatum from West coast of India. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2016, 4, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Arora, S.; Kumar, G.; Meena, S. Screening and evaluation of bioactive components of cenchrus ciliaris l. by GC-MS ANALYSIS. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2017, 8, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chien, C.C.; Chou, M.Y.; Chen, C.Y.; Shih, M.C. Analysis of genetic diversity of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae populations in Taiwan. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Figueiredo, C.; Matsuo, A.; Pereira, F.; Rabaca, A.; Farias, C.; Girola, N.; Massaoka, M.H.; A Azevedo, R.; Scutti, J.A.; Arruda, D.C.; et al. Pyrostegia venusta heptane extract containing saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons induces apoptosis on B16F10-Nex2 melanoma cells and displays antitumor activity in vivo. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2014, 10, S363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Nithya, T.G.; Jayanthi, J.; Raghunathan, M.G. Phytochemical, antibacterial and GC MS analysis of a floating fern salvinia molesta D.S. Mitchell (1972). Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2015, 8, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  38. Duart, M.J.; García-Domenech, R.; Gálvez, J.; Alemán, P.A.; Martín-Algarra, R.V.; Antón-Fos, G.M. Application of a mathematical topological pattern of antihistaminic activity for the selection of new drug candidates and pharmacology assays. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3667–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ganesh, M.; Mohankumar, M. Extraction and identification of bioactive components in Sida cordata (Burm.f.) using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 3082–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Trust, T.J.; Bartlett, K.H. Antibacterial activity of tropilidine and tropone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1975, 8, 381–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Van Arnam, E.B.; Ruzzini, A.C.; Sit, C.S.; Horn, H.; Pinto-Tomás, A.A.; Currie, C.R.; Clardy, J. Selvamicin, an atypical antifungal polyene from two alternative genomic contexts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12940–12945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Evangelista-Martínez, Z. Preliminary Study on Some Actinomycetes and Evaluation of Their Potential Antagonism against Fungal Pathogens. Br. Microbiol. Res. J. 2014, 4, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Voirol, L.R.P.; Frago, E.; Kaltenpoth, M.; Hilker, M.; Fatouros, N.E. Bacterial symbionts in lepidoptera: Their diversity, transmission, and impact on the host. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Malviya, M.K.; Pandey, A.; Sharma, A.; Tiwari, S.C. Characterization and identification of actinomycetes isolated from “fired plots” under shifting cultivation in northeast Himalaya, India. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ndonde, M.J.M.; Semu, E. Preliminary characterization of some Streptomyces species from four Tanzanian soils and their antimicrobial potential against selected plant and animal pathogenic bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 16, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhao, J.; Han, L.; Yu, M.; Cao, P.; Li, D.; Guo, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Xiang, W. Characterization of Streptomyces sporangiiformans sp. Nov., a novel soil actinomycete with antibacterial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kurnianto, M.A.; Kusumaningrum, H.D.; Lioe, H.N. Characterization of Streptomyces Isolates Associated with Estuarine Fish Chanos chanos and Profiling of Their Antibacterial Metabolites-Crude-Extract. Int. J. Microbiol. 2020, 2020, 8851947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Siddique, S.; Syed, Q.; Adnan, A.; Ashraf Qureshi, F. Isolation, characterization and selection of avermectin-producing Streptomyces avermitilis strains from soil samples. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2014, 7, e10366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preliminary screening of potential strain by antimicrobial activity. (A) Antibacterial activity toward (1) S. aureus, (2) S. typhi, (3) S. pneumoniae, (4) P. aeruginosa, and (5) K. pneumoniae. (B) C. albicans. (C) Aspergillus niger.
Figure 1. Preliminary screening of potential strain by antimicrobial activity. (A) Antibacterial activity toward (1) S. aureus, (2) S. typhi, (3) S. pneumoniae, (4) P. aeruginosa, and (5) K. pneumoniae. (B) C. albicans. (C) Aspergillus niger.
Applsci 12 12257 g001
Figure 2. Morphology of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 in different media: (A) ISP-2 medium; (B) ISP-4 medium; (C) starch casein agar.
Figure 2. Morphology of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 in different media: (A) ISP-2 medium; (B) ISP-4 medium; (C) starch casein agar.
Applsci 12 12257 g002
Figure 3. Microscopically examination Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1: (A) light microscopy; (B) SEM.
Figure 3. Microscopically examination Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1: (A) light microscopy; (B) SEM.
Applsci 12 12257 g003
Figure 4. Phylogenetic analysis of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1. The phylogenetic tree was constructed on the basis of the 16s rRNA sequences using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model in MEGA 11.0.13. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic analysis of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1. The phylogenetic tree was constructed on the basis of the 16s rRNA sequences using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model in MEGA 11.0.13. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed.
Applsci 12 12257 g004
Figure 5. GC–MS chromatogram for EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Figure 5. GC–MS chromatogram for EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Applsci 12 12257 g005
Figure 6. Antimicrobial activity of EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 against bacterial pathogens: (A) K. pneumoniae; (B) P. aeruginosa; (C) S. typhi; (D) S. pneumoniae; (E) S. aureus; (F) C. albicans. For bacteria; 1 = 5 µg/disc, 2 = 10 µg/disc, 3 = 40 µg/disc, 4 = 80 µg/disc, and 5 = negative control DMSO; for fungi, 1 = 20 µg/disc, 2 = 40 µg/disc, 3 = 80 µg/disc, 4 = 200 µg/disc, 5 = 400 µg/disc, and 6 = negative control DMSO.
Figure 6. Antimicrobial activity of EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 against bacterial pathogens: (A) K. pneumoniae; (B) P. aeruginosa; (C) S. typhi; (D) S. pneumoniae; (E) S. aureus; (F) C. albicans. For bacteria; 1 = 5 µg/disc, 2 = 10 µg/disc, 3 = 40 µg/disc, 4 = 80 µg/disc, and 5 = negative control DMSO; for fungi, 1 = 20 µg/disc, 2 = 40 µg/disc, 3 = 80 µg/disc, 4 = 200 µg/disc, 5 = 400 µg/disc, and 6 = negative control DMSO.
Applsci 12 12257 g006
Figure 7. SEM analysis of treated K. pneumonia with EtOAc extract at 80 µg.
Figure 7. SEM analysis of treated K. pneumonia with EtOAc extract at 80 µg.
Applsci 12 12257 g007
Figure 8. (A) Cell proliferation analysis by MTT assay. Different concentrations of EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 were used to treat MCF-7 (breast cancer) and Hep-G2 (Hepatocarcinoma cells) cancer cell lines. The means ± SE followed by different letters (a–e) within the same row are significantly different (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). (B) Anticancer effect of with and without EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Figure 8. (A) Cell proliferation analysis by MTT assay. Different concentrations of EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 were used to treat MCF-7 (breast cancer) and Hep-G2 (Hepatocarcinoma cells) cancer cell lines. The means ± SE followed by different letters (a–e) within the same row are significantly different (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05). (B) Anticancer effect of with and without EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Applsci 12 12257 g008
Table 1. Cultural characterization of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 on different culture media.
Table 1. Cultural characterization of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1 on different culture media.
Parameter/
Medium
Color of AMColor of SMAM/SMGrowthForm of Spore ChainPigmentation
ISP-2WhiteYellowAMGoodFlexibilisOil yellow
ISP-4WhiteLight whiteAMGoodFlexibilis-
ISP-5Creamy whiteLight whiteAMModerateFlexibilis-
ISP-6Yellowish whiteLight whiteAMGoodFlexibilis-
ISP-7WhiteLight whiteAMGoodFlexibilis
Czapex Dox WhiteLight whiteAMPoorFlexibilis-
Starch casein agarWhite Light yellowAMGoodFlexibilis
AM: arial mycelium; SM: substrate mycelium.
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Growth at Different Conc. NaCl
1%+++
4%+
7%
10%
14%
Growth at Different pH
5
7+
10
Growth at Different Temperatures (°C)
4
26++
30+++
37+
45
Table 3. Different enzyme activities of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Table 3. Different enzyme activities of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Enzyme Activity
Amylase+
DNase
Catalase+
Hydrolysis of esculin+
H2S production
Protease +
Lecithin hydrolysis
Lipid hydrolysis+
Urea hydrolysis+
Nitrate reduction+
Chitinase+
Table 4. Growth at different carbon and nitrogen sources of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Table 4. Growth at different carbon and nitrogen sources of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Carbon Sources
Arabinose
Fructose+
D-xylose+
Citrate +
Raffinose
D-galactose+
Lactose
Sucrose+
Nitrogen Sources
L-Histidine
L-Cysteine++
L-Phenylalanine+
L-Valine+
Table 5. Antibiotic resistance status of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Table 5. Antibiotic resistance status of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Antibiotic Resistance
AKAmikacin (30 µg)
ATMAztreonam (30 µg)+
CChloramphenicol (30 µg)
CAZCeftazidime (30 µg)+
CIPCiprofloxacin (1 µg)+
COColisttin sulphate (10 µg)+
EErythromycin (15 µg)
GMGentamamicin (10 µg)+
IMIImipenem (10 µg)
KKanamycin (1000 µg)
PGPenicillin G (10 µg)+
PRLPiperacillin (100 µg)+
RPRifampicin (30 µg)+
TTetracycline (30 µg)
VAVancomycin (5 µg)+
Table 6. Compound analysis by GC–MS for EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
Table 6. Compound analysis by GC–MS for EtOAc extract of Streptomyces sp. strain ess_amH1.
S. NoCompound NameRTMolecular FormulaM.WArea (%)Applications References
1Cyclobutanol6.10C4H8O72.110.56Antibacterial[23]
2Cyclohexane, butyl-6.64C10H20140.20.44Antimicrobial[24]
3Undecane, 5,7-dimethyl-7.61C13H28184.30.41Antimicrobial[25]
4E-2-Decenal8.96C10H18O154.23.40Antimicrobial[26,27,28]
5Tetradecane9.08C14H30198.33.40Anticandidal[29]
6Cyclohexane, 1,1′-(1,2-dimethyl)9.20C16H30222.40.82Antimicrobial[24]
7Cyclohexane, hexyl-9.69C12H24168.32.67Antimicrobial[24]
8Oxiranemethanol10.0C9H10O2150.10.03Antibacterial[30]
92-Undecanone10.3C11H22O170.21.52Antimicrobial[25]
105-Eicosene11.4C20H40280.52.57Anticancer[31]
113-Tetredecane11.7C14H28196.37.48Antimicrobial[25]
12Tetredecane11.8C14H30198.35.01Antimicrobial[25]
13Cyclohexane, 1,2,4,5-tetraethyl12.0C14H28196.30.67Antimicrobial[24]
14Cyclohexane, octyl-12.7C14H28196.32.04Antimicrobial[24]
151,1-Dichloro-2-dodecanol15.1C12H24Cl2O255.20.38Antifungal[32]
16Bis(3,5,5-trimethylhexyl) ether 15.2C18H38O270.510.22Antifungal[33]
17Hexadecane15.3C16H34226.43.92Antimicrobial[23]
18Cyclohexane, decyl-16.2C16H32224.41.09Antimicrobial[24]
198-Pentadecanone16.4C15H30O226.42.29Hepatotoxic[34]
201-Dodecane17.9C12H26170.30.33Antimicrobial[32]
21Bis (3,5,5-trimethylhexyl) ether17.9C18H38O270.57.29Antimicrobial[33]
22Eicosane18.0C20H42282.51.86Antimicrobial[3]
238-Pentadecanone18.9C15H30O226.42.49Antimicrobial[3]
24Acrylic acid hexadecanyl ester19.4C19H36O2296.20.89--
251, 1, 1, 2-Tetrafluoro-2-tridecene19.6C13H22F4254.30.08--
261,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid19.8C8H6O4166.13.90Antimicrobial[35]
27Bis-(3,5,5-trimethylhexyl) ether 20.2C18H38O270.56.78Antifungal[33]
28Bis-(3-oxo-6′-diethylamino-spi)20.5C48H40N2O7756.90.42--
295-Eicosene22.1C20H40280.56.02Anticancer[31]
30Octacosane23.0C28H58394.82.19Antitumor[36]
31Dotriacontane23.9C32H66450.95.91Antimicrobial[37]
322,4-Bis(α,α-dimethylbenzyl)phenol25.1C24H26O330.52.99Antihistaminic [38]
332, 2, 5, 5, 6-Pentamethyl-4, 7, 9-trioxabicyclo [4.2.1] nonane29.1C11H20O3200.23.50--
34Dodecane, 1,1-difluoro30.2C12H24F2206.32.27Anticancer[39]
352, 4, 6–Cycloheptatrien-1-one31.1C7H6O106.10.61Antibacterial[40]
36Dodecane, 1,1-difluoro31.6C12H24F2206.33.26Anticancer[38]
Table 7. Antimicrobial activity of EtOAc extract of the strain ess_amH1 against some bacterial and fungal pathogens.
Table 7. Antimicrobial activity of EtOAc extract of the strain ess_amH1 against some bacterial and fungal pathogens.
Bacterial Pathogens (mm)
Concentrations5 µg 10 µg 40 µg 80 µg
Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883)8 ± 1 d11 ± 1.5 c15 ± 1.1 b17.5 ± 1.2 a
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853)-8.5 ± 0.14 b12 ± 0.15 a14 ± 16 a
Salmonella typhi (ATCC 14028)8 ± 1.3 d10 ± 1 c13 ± 1 b1.6 ± 0.9 a
Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619)9 ± 1 c10 ± 2 bc12 ± 1.5 b17 ± 1 a
Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923)7 ± 1.3 c8.5 ± 1.5 c12 ± 1 b18 ± 1.2 a
Fungal Pathogen (mm)
Concentrations20 µg40 µg80 µg200 µg400 µg
Candida albicans7 ± 1.5 c8 ± 2 c13 ± 1.9 b15 ± 1.5 b21 ± 1.6 a
The mean ± SE followed by different letters (a–d) within the same row were significantly different (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Enazi, N.M.; Abdel-Raouf, N.; Alharbi, R.M.; Sholkamy, E.N. Metabolic Profiling of Streptomyces sp. Strain ess_amH1 Isolated from Apis mellifera yemintica’s Gut Microbiome, and Its Anticancer Activity against Breast Cancer (MCF7) and Hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) Cell Lines, as Well as Antimicrobial Activity. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 12257. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312257

AMA Style

Al-Enazi NM, Abdel-Raouf N, Alharbi RM, Sholkamy EN. Metabolic Profiling of Streptomyces sp. Strain ess_amH1 Isolated from Apis mellifera yemintica’s Gut Microbiome, and Its Anticancer Activity against Breast Cancer (MCF7) and Hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) Cell Lines, as Well as Antimicrobial Activity. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(23):12257. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312257

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Enazi, Nouf Mohammed, Neveen Abdel-Raouf, Reem Mohammed Alharbi, and Essam Nageh Sholkamy. 2022. "Metabolic Profiling of Streptomyces sp. Strain ess_amH1 Isolated from Apis mellifera yemintica’s Gut Microbiome, and Its Anticancer Activity against Breast Cancer (MCF7) and Hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) Cell Lines, as Well as Antimicrobial Activity" Applied Sciences 12, no. 23: 12257. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312257

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop