Next Article in Journal
Expression of C Reactive Protein in Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Patients with Periodontitis Wearing Metal-Ceramic Dental Crowns
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Impact Loads Transmitted to Vibro-Ripper Housing Using Transfer Path Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 19
10.3390/app131910989
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural, Dielectric, and Mechanical Properties of High-Content Cubic Zirconia Ceramics Obtained via Solid-State Synthesis

by
Sholpan G. Giniyatova
1,
Artem L. Kozlovskiy
1,2,*,
Rafael I. Shakirzyanov
1,
Natalia O. Volodina
1,
Dmitriy I. Shlimas
1,3 and
Daryn B. Borgekov
1,3
1
Engineering Profile Laboratory, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
2
Department of General Physics, Satbayev University, Almaty 050032, Kazakhstan
3
Laboratory of Solid State Physics, The Institute of Nuclear Physics, Almaty 050032, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(19), 10989; https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910989
Submission received: 14 September 2023 / Revised: 1 October 2023 / Accepted: 4 October 2023 / Published: 5 October 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, the structural, electrical, and mechanical properties and phase composition of high-content cubic zirconium oxide ceramics stabilized with Ca were investigated. The novelty of this work lies in evaluating the potential use of porous ceramics obtained using calcium carbonate as a matrix for dispersed nuclear fuel. Experimental samples were prepared using solid-phase synthesis through sintering in air at 1500 °C. The X-ray diffraction method and Raman spectroscopy showed that the fraction of the cubic zirconium oxide ZrO2-c phase gradually increased as the mass concentration changed from Cw = 0.00 to Cw = 0.15, and the CaZrO3 phase was present at concentrations of Cw = 0.20 and Cw = 0.25. When the phase composition was altered, significant changes occurred in the internal microstructure of the ceramics due to the processes of grain sintering and pore formation. Quantitative XRD analysis demonstrated the incorporation of Ca into the cubic structure of the ZrO2-c polymorph. Dielectric spectroscopy at low frequencies revealed that the synthesized ceramics had a dielectric constant of 16.8–22 with a low dielectric loss of ~ 0.005. The microhardness value at a load of 200 kgf (HV0.2) of the obtained samples varied between 5 and 12 GPa and depended on the internal microstructure and phase composition. The obtained results clearly indicate that the mechanical and electrical properties and phase composition of synthesized ceramics make them suitable as a matrix for dispersed nuclear fuels.

1. Introduction

At present, great efforts are aimed at making nuclear power safer for the environment. One important direction of this research is the use of oxide and nitride inert matrices for nuclear fuel. In this type of fuel, uranium is substituted with elements that do not create actinides when bombarded by neutrons. Thus, it will be possible to reduce the amount of additional plutonium generated through the burning of conventional uranium dioxide nuclear fuel [1]. The study of inert matrices for nuclear fuel is a current focus due to various reasons, such as the high energy potential of plutonium, the possibility of processing large stockpiles of weapons-grade plutonium, and the fact that transuranic elements can significantly increase the radiotoxicity of conventional spent fuel beyond several hundred years.
Inert matrices represent conventional ceramics, in which actinide oxide globules are uniformly spread. These materials must act as a mechanical support, withstanding deformations caused by fission and heat dissipation. For this reason, the ceramics being developed must have excellent mechanical properties such as strength, crack resistance, and hardness. Besides excellent mechanical properties, good thermal conductivity and a low expansion coefficients must be realized too. Also, these ceramics are exposed to a significant amount of radiation caused by fission products. They must be able to sustain damage of up to 10,000 dpa without significant deterioration (including secondary phase formation and transmutation effects) [2]. A review of the literature on the properties of ceramic materials shows the most suitable candidates for the role of inert matrices, such as MgO, CeO2, ZrO2, and the nitrides ZrN and CeN [3].
Zirconium oxide is a great choice for the inert matrix of dispersed nuclear fuel due to its high melting point of 2700 °C, low neutron absorption cross-section, and outstanding mechanical properties (strength, hardness, and fracture toughness) [4]. To obtain zirconia ceramics, different methods such as such-solid state sintering [5], hydrothermal methods [6], physical vapor deposition [7], and anodization [8] can be used. Pure zirconia has a monoclinic stable structure at ambient temperature, which changes to a tetragonal phase upon heating (1170–2370 °C) and to a cubic structure at higher temperatures (2370–2680 °C) [9]. The tetragonal-to-monoclinic transition is martensitic and leads to a volume expansion of around 4%. Since this expansion causes significant internal stresses that can induce cracking and even component failure upon cooling after sintering, pure zirconia’s applications as an advanced ceramic have been severely constrained [10].
To overcome problems with ceramic cracking and make industrial applications possible, the high-temperature tetragonal or cubic phases must be stabilized. The formation of these highly symmetrical phases can be achieved by doping the oxide with cations with an ionic radius close to that of tetravalent zirconium, such as Mg2+, Ca2+, Y3+, or Ce4+. The stability of the cubic and tetragonal phases may both be controlled by the quantity of doping oxide supplied [11].
Recently, it was discovered that calcia-doped zirconia ceramics display the same phase transformation features and hardness properties as yttria-doped zirconia ceramics, but can be made at a lower cost and in higher quantities owing to the accessibility of calcium precursors compared to yttrium [12]. In addition, calcium doping produces twice as many vacancies in zirconium dioxide as yttrium does, which leads to a higher ionic conductivity of Ca-doped ZrO2 than Y-doped ZrO2 [13]. Therefore, Ca-stabilized ZrO2 has been considered for use as an electrolyte in solid oxide fuel cells and oxygen detectors [14,15].
Previous studies performed on 16 mol% calcium-doped zirconia showed that the sintering temperature is the primary factor influencing the characteristics of the obtained ceramics. Above 1000 °C, a solid-state interaction between calcium oxide and zirconium oxide occurred, and at 1400 °C, a completely stable cubic phase (97%) formed. Using TG/DSC analysis, the authors verified that calcium-stabilized zirconia is stable at high temperatures; thus, it is especially useful for high-temperature applications [16]. This feature can be advantageous to tetragonal-stabilized zirconia ceramics because of the absence of the reversible phase transformation in high-content cubic zirconia ceramics.
As is known, the most widespread method of producing functional ceramics is solid-phase synthesis using oxides, which includes co-milling of the initial reagents, pressing, and sintering [17,18]. However, other reagents, such as carbonates, are often used in ceramic technology to control shrinkage and pore formation [19,20,21]. To unambiguously evaluate the suitability of ceramics for inert matrices, high-cost experiments with the irradiation of heavy ions in ion beam accelerators can be performed [22]. Prior to this test, standard material characterization must be performed. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the mechanical and electrical properties and structural features of high-content cubic zirconia ceramics obtained via solid-state sintering. Through a detailed analysis of how the doping of zirconium oxide with CaCO3 affects the lattice parameters, phase composition, particle size, microhardness, and dielectric properties of sintered ceramics, a preliminary estimation of its applicability in nuclear power as inert matrices was performed.

2. Experimental Section

The experimental samples were synthesized via solid-phase sintering. The initial components were zirconium oxide (Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA, CAS Registry number 1314-23-4, particle size < 5 μm, density 5.89 g/cm3, purity ≥ 99.99%) and calcium carbonate (Sigma Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA, CAS Registry Number 471-34-1, particle size < 5 μm, density 2.93 g/cm3, purity ≥ 99.99%). In the initial mixture, the concentrations of CaCO3 (dopant) expressed through the weight fraction of Cw were 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25. In the first step, the initial mixture was homogenized via dry milling. Prior to the milling process, the initial powders were weighed using high-precision scales according to the weight fraction. For homogenization, the planetary mill PULVERISETTE 6 classic line (Fritsch International, Idar-Oberstein, Germany) with tungsten carbide balls was used. Dry milling of the charge was carried out for 30 min at 250 rpm; the ratio of balls to mixture was 2:1. In the second step, the resulting homogenized powder was mixed with the binder of an aqueous solution of polyvinyl alcohol (JSC EuroChem, Kovdor, Russia, 16/1 grade, CAS Registry Number 9002-89-5, molecular weight 31,000–50,000) in the required ratio (about 1 wt.% of the polyvinyl alcohol in the dry residue). In the third step, green pellets from pressed powders were formed via pressing. A hydraulic press and a stainless steel mold were used to produce green pellets of the resulting powder in the form of tablets with a thickness of ~1 mm and a diameter of 12.1 mm by applying a pressure of ~200 MPa. In the final step, the samples were sintered in the air at 1500 °C for 5 h in a muffle furnace using a corundum crucible.
The obtained ceramic tablets were investigated via X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using a D8 Advance Eco diffractometer (Bruker GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), Raman spectroscopy using an Enspectr M532 spectrometer (Spectr-M LLC, Chernogolovka, Russia), and dielectric spectroscopy using a HIOKI IM3533 LCR meter (HIOKI E.E. Corporation, Ueda, Japan). To perform dielectric measurements, silver paste was applied to both sides of the tablet surface to create a plain capacitor structure. Micrographs were taken on cross-sections of the tablets using a Hitachi TM 3030 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Elemental analysis and elemental mapping were performed using a Quantax 70 unit (Bruker GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The morphological parameters (the grains’ size and distribution) were evaluated using ImageJ software 1.54f. Before grain size calculation, the digital images obtained via SEM were adjusted to obtain a clear, high-contrast view of the grains. After that, automatic and manual defining of the grain outlines with calculation of the Feret diameter were carried out. The microhardness of the obtained ceramics was determined using the Vickers method with a diamond indenter on a METKON Duroline-M microhardness tester (Metkon Instruments Inc., Bursa, Turkey) under a load of 0.2 kgf at a dwell time of 10 s. Before the hardness test, the surface of the tablets was gently ground and polished according to the procedures in DIN EN ISO 6507-2:2018 [23] and ISO 14705:2016 [24].

3. Results and Discussion

The physical properties and structural characteristics of oxide ceramics are strongly dependent on their phase composition [25]. For this reason, the identification of the phase composition of the obtained samples via powder X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy was conducted. The X-ray powder diffractograms for the synthesized ceramics are shown in Figure 1. Phase analysis showed the presence of three phases in the samples: ZrO2-m (zirconium oxide monoclinic cell, space group P21/c, COD 04-004-4339), ZrO2-c (zirconium oxide cubic cell, space group Fm-3m, COD 04-002-8314), and CaZrO3 (calcium zirconate orthorhombic cell, space group Pcmn, PDF 00-035-0790). Quantitative analysis of the diffractograms was conducted via the Rietveld method using Profex 5.0.2 software [26]. The phase analysis revealed that the undoped ceramics had only the monoclinic ZrO2-m phase. With increasing dopant concentrations up to Cw = 0.05–0.15, two zirconium oxide phases were present in the ceramics: monoclinic ZrO2-m and cubic ZrO2-c. With a further increase in CaCO3 concentration, no monoclinic phase was found and the phase composition was represented by the ZrO2-c phase together with the perovskite CaZrO3 phase.
The sintering of the ZrO2-m charge with a small amount of dopant containing Ca2+ ions leads to the replacement of Zr4+ ions by calcium and the formation of oxygen vacancies [27]. This substitution is the driving force for stabilizing the ZrO2-c phase and suppressing the martensitic transition upon cooling to room temperature [28]. When the dopant concentration was increased to 0.20, the CaZrO3 phase was formed. It can be argued that at a concentration of 0.20, the limit at which Ca2+ ions can enter the crystal lattice of the ZrO2-c phase was reached. The formation of cubic-phase ZrO2-c with CaZrO3 at concentrations of 0.20 and 0.25 agrees with the obtained phase diagrams for the CaO-ZrO2 system [29,30]. Despite using calcium carbonate as the initial reagent, the annealing process is presumed to cause the decomposition of CaCO3 → CaO + CO2 (decomposition temperature ~1000 °C), followed by the reaction CaO + ZrO2 → CaZrO3. As a result, the experimental data align well with the phase diagrams.
The results of the calculated values of the lattice parameters for the measured diffractograms are given in Table 1 and Table 2. The observed increase in the lattice parameter and volume in the cubic phase suggests that the incorporation of Ca2+ ions, which have a larger ionic radius, into the ZrO2-m structure leads to two significant outcomes. Firstly, it induces the transition of the monoclinic phase into the cubic phase. Secondly, it causes the expansion of the cubic unit cell. In the case of the ZrO2-m phase, the unit cell volume decreases with increasing dopant concentration owing to the decrease in parameters a and b. The highest values of the unit cell volume and parameters a and b for the undoped sample can be attributed to the tensile stresses developed after cooling. To confirm this hypothesis, the Williamson–Hall method was applied to an undoped sample to determine the type of stress (compressive or tensile) from an analysis of the diffractogram peaks. [31]. The FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum) and the peak center of the most prominent reflections were determined using Profex 5.0.2 software. Figure 2a shows that the approximation line has a positive slope, indicating tensile stresses. Thus, it can be stated that the increased value of the lattice parameters in the undoped ceramics is due to tensile stresses. These stresses arise during cooling, when a transition from the tetragonal phase to the monoclinic phase occurs.
The average crystalline size was calculated using the Debye–Scherer equation for all samples. The main characteristic peaks of each phase were also fitted using Profex 5.0.2 software. The results of this calculation are presented in Figure 1. The lowest crystalline size for an undoped sample can be explained by tensile stresses in the crystal structure. It is observed that with increasing Ca content in sintered ceramics, the average crystallites become larger. The possible reason for this fact is that in stabilized cubic zirconia, during the cooling t → m transformation, significant distortion of the crystal lattice does not occur. This leads to the relaxation of tensile stresses and increases the crystallite size.
Table 3 lists the statistical parameters of the Rietveld refinement and phase composition of the obtained ceramics. The parameters R-factor (Rexp, Rwp), goodness of fit (GOF), and standard deviation χ2 exhibit relatively low values, indicating the fitting results’ reliability. These low values imply a small difference between the experimental and calculated data, thus affirming the accuracy of the fitting process. Based on the evaluation of the phase composition and lattice parameters of the resulting ceramics, it can be concluded that an increase in CaCO3 concentration leads to the following changes in the phase composition: ZrO2-m transitions to ZrO2-m + ZrO2-c with the substitution of Zr4+ by Ca2+ ions in the range of Cw = 0.05–0.15; ZrO2-c coexists with CaZrO3, reaching the substitution limit with the separation of the second phase. Moreover, by varying the dopant concentration from 0 to 0.10, it is possible to obtain partially stabilized zirconium oxide ceramics. At a concentration of 0.15, fully stabilized ceramics are formed. In the concentration range of 0.20 to 0.25, partially stabilized zirconia ceramics with a fraction of CaZrO3 are obtained.
Since the set of peaks in the powder diffractogram of the tetragonal zirconium oxide phase closely resembled those of the cubic ZrO2-c phase, Raman spectroscopy (Figure 2b) was employed to clarify the phase composition of the synthesized ceramics. In the case of pure zirconium oxide sintered at 1500 °C, fourteen active modes were observed: seven Ag (178, 190, 306, 346, 475, 558, and 636 cm−1), six Bg (221, 333, 381, 503, 536, and 615 cm−1), characteristic of the monoclinic phase [32], and a peak at 581 cm−1, which disappeared at a Ca concentration of 0.05. The spectra of the samples with Ca concentrations of 0.10 and 0.15 showed only three very broad peaks at 156, 277, and 608 cm−1, associated with the cubic phase of the fluorite structure (O5h, Fm−3m) [16]. At a Ca concentration of 0.20, the broad peaks of the cubic phase were still pronounced, but new sharp peaks also began to appear. Finally, for a Ca concentration of 0.25, Raman modes were observed at 146, 190, 212, 230, 262, 286, 309, 358, 438, 470, and 546 cm−1, indicating the formation of orthorhombic perovskite-phase CaZrO3 [33]. Notably, the peak at 610 cm−1 indicated the cubic phase of zirconium oxide. Thus, the results of the powder diffractogram analysis were enhanced using Raman spectroscopy.
Figure 3 shows microphotographs of the cross-sections of the obtained ceramics. The microstructure of the undoped sample (Figure 3a) was characterized by the presence of well-defined grains with a large number of faces, a pronounced intergrain boundary, and the presence of intergrain pores. The mentioned grain shape is largely characteristic of crystallites with a monoclinic crystal lattice. When the dopant was introduced at a concentration of Cw = 0.05 (Figure 3b), significant changes in the microstructure occurred. In addition to grains with sizes of 2–3 μm, smaller grains and larger grains with sizes of 6–8 μm were formed. Upon further increasing the proportion of CaCO3 in the charge, the microstructure of the synthesized ceramics (Figure 3c–f) exhibited grains with relatively complex shapes. This complexity arose from the sintering process, resulting in the fusion of individual grains. Additionally, there was a reduced number of intergranular boundaries, and the presence of intergrain pores was observed.
For a more detailed analysis of the microstructure of the synthesized samples, the grain size distribution in the ceramics was evaluated using ImageJ software 1.54f [34]. For the set of statistics, the sizes of 100 grains were determined from the SEM micrographs. The results of the analysis are presented as histograms in Figure 4. As can be seen from the figure, the average grain size decreased at Cw = 0.05 from 3.42 to 1.82 μm. At a dopant concentration of 0.10, the average size reached a maximum value of 7.36 μm and decreased again with increasing concentrations of 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25 to values of 5.33, 4.73, and 4.68 μm, respectively. In the undoped sample (Figure 4a), a broad grain size distribution was observed with a peak at 2.5–3 μm, comprising no more than 22% of the grains. However, at low dopant concentrations (Cw = 0.05, Figure 4b), the grain size distribution became narrower, with a peak in the range of 1–1.5 μm. An important observation is the presence of grains with sizes that are twice the average grain size. This indicates the initiation of grain growth, likely resulting from phase transformations during the diffusion process.
Samples with dopant concentrations of Cw = 0.10 and 0.15 (Figure 4c,d) exhibited large ranges of grains size, spanning from 0 to 22 μm. This indicates the occurrence of intensive processes of grain coalescence and coarsening during annealing [35]. These samples were characterized by the highest values of the fraction of the cubic phase (Table 3), signifying the decisive contribution of phase transformations during atomic diffusion to grain growth [36]. However, with increasing concentration, a decrease in the grain size range and average grain size were observed. This can be attributed to the large concentration of CO2 gas released during annealing, which forms pores. The presence of pores is a critical factor in the further densification of ceramics due to the grain growth [27]. For this reason, for concentrations of 0.20 and 0.25 (Figure 4e,f), despite the intense coalescence and expansion of grains, the average grain size and distribution range decreased. It can also be argued that the CaCO3 in the charge is a pore-forming agent and significantly affects the microstructure of zirconia ceramics.
Figure 5 shows the spectra of the energy-dispersive analysis of the obtained ceramics. The spectra suggest that the synthesized samples contained only Ca, Zr, and O. With increasing dopant concentration, the intensity of the peak related to Ca increased, indicating an increase in the concentration of this element in the ceramic composition. The chemical composition of the obtained samples is shown in Table 4. The analysis of the peaks using Quantax 75 software over the scan area shown in Figure 6 demonstrates that the atomic percentage of Ca increased with increasing Cw. The discrepancy between the atomic percentages and stoichiometric formulas can be explained by the large degree of roughness of the cross-sections. This roughness makes it difficult to detect X-ray photons, which can change the atomic composition from stoichiometric. Elemental mapping of the cross-section of the ceramic sample showed that oxygen and zirconium ions were uniformly distributed over the ceramic surface. However, for the sample with a concentration Cw = 0.05, it can be observed that Ca ions were distributed predominantly in large grains. Considering the results of the powder diffractogram analysis, it can be concluded that the small grains were predominantly composed of monoclinic phases. In the case of ceramics with high dopant concentrations, the non-uniform distribution is due to the formation of the CaZrO3 phase, which contains more Ca than the substituted ZrO2—c phase.
The frequency dependences of the dielectric permittivities of the synthesized ceramics are shown in Figure 7a. As is evident from the figure, the dielectric constant remains nearly constant across the frequency range of 200–200 kHz, suggesting the absence of relaxation processes in the ceramics, unlike, for example, in ferrite ceramics like NiFe2O4 [37,38,39,40]. Generally, the dielectric properties of ceramics depend on electronic polarization, ionic polarization, relaxation, and resonance. Low-frequency relaxation in oxide ceramics with transition elements or ions of different valences can occur in accordance with Koop’s theory, which considers ceramic to be a nonhomogeneous medium with intergranular boundaries and crystalline grains with different dielectric properties [17,41]. In such a medium, there is a possibility of the Maxwell–Wagner polarization mechanism occurring between poorly conducting intergranular interfaces and well-conducting crystalline grains. This was not observed in the obtained samples, which suggests a small difference in the dielectric properties of the structural units of the synthesized zirconium ceramics (intergranular boundaries, grains, and pores). As will be shown later, the variation in the dielectric permittivity is related to the porosity of the samples and phase composition of the ceramics. Figure 7b illustrates the frequency dependence of the dielectric loss tan δ, which demonstrates how much of the energy of an electric sinusoidal wave is transferred to heat during the repolarization processes. Zirconia ceramics are considered to be high-Q dielectric materials for microwave application [42]. The low losses can be attributed to the presence of only losses associated with phonon vibrations in the crystal structure of high-density homogeneous ceramics, and these losses can reach values of 5∙10−3 or even 6∙10−4 [43]. If dielectric monocrystal or polycrystal (ceramics) is free from structural defects, impurities, porosity, and microcracks, only intrinsic loss mechanisms contribute to the value of tan δ. The measurement results show that the lowest losses in the larger region of the frequency spectrum were characterized by the sample without doping (0.0025–0.005). When Cw was increased to 0.05, the value of tan δ increased by a factor of ~3 in the low-frequency region and decreased rapidly with increasing frequency. This behavior can be attributed to the pronounced polydispersed grain size distribution in ceramics and the presence of a large percentage of small-sized grains. In this case, the surface fraction of atoms increases, which increases the number of unsaturated chemical bonds. These unsaturated bonds can be considered defects in the crystal lattice that can anchor electrical dipoles and interfere with the polarization process. For the other samples, the dielectric losses were 0.005–0.0075 in the investigated frequency range. It can be concluded that the main mechanisms of dielectric losses in the obtained ceramics are electronic polarization and ionic polarization.
To determine the reasons for the change in the dielectric constant when the dopant concentration is increased, the following factors should be considered: the porosity of the ceramics, the phase composition, and the influence of the dopant element on polarizability. Determining the porosity of ceramics without using techniques that utilize gases or liquids requires knowledge of the density of the material. In the case of the samples studied in this work, an accurate estimation of the theoretical density is difficult because most samples are multiphase, and, as shown in the X-ray diffraction studies, the density of the phases can vary significantly (Table 2). The apparent density of the sintered tablets was determined by measuring their geometric parameters and weights. Figure 8a shows the change in the dielectric constant and apparent density as a function of the dopant concentration. Up to a concentration of Cw = 0.20, the change in the dielectric permittivity generally coincides with the change in the apparent density. The dielectric constant of the undoped sample was lower than that of the ceramics studied herein (24 vs. 16.4) [44]. This can be explained by the presence of martensitic phase transitions ZrO2-m → ZrO2-t (1170 °C) and t → m, after which mechanical stresses are formed in the undoped sample, leading to the appearance of internal microcracks that increase the porosity. This can also be observed when measuring the apparent density, which is 4.75 g/cm3 versus the theoretical density of 5.8 g/cm3 for the monoclinic zirconium oxide. The decrease in the apparent density of the doped ceramics is due to the increase in the number of pores in the ceramics with higher calcium carbonate concentration in the charge. The maximum apparent density was observed for ceramics with a dopant concentration of Cw = 0.05, which can be explained by the small number of pores that are formed by the release of CO2 gas as well as by the peculiarities of the microstructure, in which small grains are densely packed. With a further decrease in the apparent density of ceramics with Cw = 0.10, the dielectric constant does not decrease, which may be due to the increase in the fraction of the cubic phase. In this case, as stated earlier, the cubic structure, which has a smaller crystal cell volume, is stabilized. According to the Clausius–Mossotti equation, the dielectric permittivity of the crystals is related to the polarizability and unit cell volume as follows [45]:
ε ′ − 1 ε ′ + 2 = α 3 V ε 0
where α is the polarizability of the unit cell, V is the volume of the unit cell, and ε0 is the dielectric constant.
In the case of the cubic lattice of ZrO2-c, in addition to the volume reduction, an increase in the ionicity of the crystal bonding between the anions and cations can be assumed, which increases the polarizability α. Then, according to Equation (1), there will be an increase in the dielectric permittivity. Similar behavior of dielectric properties in ceramics is observed for Y-stabilized ZrO2, in which at low concentrations of yttrium oxide, a sharp increase in the dielectric constant is observed; for crystals with tetragonal structures, an almost twofold increase is obtained [44,46]. At Cw = 0.15 and Cw = 0.20, the determining factor in the dielectric permittivity is porosity, which can be seen from the curves in Figure 8. However, at the highest concentration of the dopant, the dielectric permittivity increases to 21, which is close to the maximum value for the series of the studied ceramics. This effect can be explained by the phase composition of the ceramics, which, according to Table 3, has a 64.58% cubic phase and a 34.42% CaZrO3 phase. Calcium zirconate has a perovskite structure with a non-centrosymmetric crystal lattice, which gives rise to a large dipole moment in the cell [47]. According to the effective medium theory, the dielectric constant of a heterogeneous medium is a function of the dielectric constant of the components and their concentrations [48]. Assuming that the dielectric constant of calcium zirconate is sufficiently high, an increase in its fraction can cause an increase in the dielectric constant despite the higher porosity of the synthesized ceramics. The dielectric permittivity of CaZrO3 is estimated to be 23–32 in a number of studies [49,50,51], which is greater than that of highly doped Ca-substituted zirconia ceramics [52].
Figure 8b shows the results of the Vickers microhardness measurements. The sample with a concentration of Cw = 0.15 is characterized by high microhardness HV0.2 = 11.2 GPa, which is comparable to other data in the literature on zirconia ceramics [53,54,55]. The microhardness and dielectric constant of ceramics depend on the phase composition and porosity. The grain size can also be emphasized as an additional factor that can affect the microhardness. In large grains, the propagation of mechanical stresses through dislocations occurs over long distances. In the case of small grains, dislocations stop at intergranular boundaries, making defect formation more difficult [56]. In other words, when the proportion of intergranular boundaries is large, the probability of crossing already formed dislocations of different orientations and crystal lattice types, which are contained in neighboring grains, increases. In this case, anchor points are created to prevent the atomic planes from sliding relative to each other. The low microhardness of the undoped sample can be explained by the presence of tensile stresses and microcracks in the structure after annealing. With increasing dopant concentration, the microhardness increased owing to the decrease in porosity at Cw = 0.05 and the change in average grain size. For the samples with Cw = 0.10 and Cw = 0.15, a significant decrease in density and an increase in grain size were observed compared to the sample with the lowest dopant fraction. It is also worth noting that in the case of these samples, the highest concentration of the cubic phase (more than 90%) was observed. Specifically, for the sample with a dopant concentration of 0.10, the highest values of average grain size and the percentage of grains with a size greater than 12 µm (8%) were observed. For the sample with Cw = 0.15, the distribution histograms show that the percentage of grains with sizes larger than 12 µm decreased to ~1%. It can be concluded that the increase in microhardness in the obtained ceramics in the range of weight concentrations of 0.05–0.15 CaCO3 is associated with the stabilization of the cubic phase and a narrower distribution of grain sizes. As the dopant concentration increased, the microhardness decreased, which was directly related to the decrease in the apparent density and the presence of a large number of pores in the microstructure. The formation of the CaZrO3 phase did not have a significant impact on the effective microhardness of the obtained samples because the microhardness values for ZrO2 and calcium zirconate were approximately the same.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the phase composition and the electrical and mechanical properties of zirconia ceramics doped with CaCO3 at different weight concentrations (Cw = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25) were investigated. After sintering in air at 1500 °C, the obtained samples were two-phased, according to the known phase diagrams of the ZrO2–CaO system. With increasing dopant concentration, the following phase transformation was observed: ZrO2-m → ZrO2-m + ZrO2-c (Cw = 0.05–0.15) → ZrO2-c + CaZrO3 (Cw = 0.2–0.25). The phase composition was also clarified using Raman spectroscopy, which showed the presence of the abovementioned phases. Using SEM, it was determined that increasing the concentration of CaCO3 significantly affected the morphology of the ceramics. With increasing Cw, a broadening of the measured grain size range was observed with increasing pore number. It can be stated that CaCO3 in the charge composition acts as a stabilizer of the cubic phase of ZrO2, as well as a pore-forming agent. The features of the microstructure and phase composition directly affected the electrical and mechanical properties of the ceramics. The highest dielectric constant was observed for the sample with the lowest dopant fraction owing to the high apparent density of the ceramics. The obtained zirconia ceramic samples can be characterized as high-Q dielectrics with dielectric losses in the frequency region of 200–200 kHz ~ 0.005 and dielectric constants of 16.4–22. The highest microhardness was observed for samples with the maximum fraction of the cubic phase and a narrower grain size distribution. Despite the high porosity of the resulting sample, using a cheaper reagent (calcium carbonate) in the solid-phase synthesis of high-content cubic zirconia ceramics turned out to be justified. All in all, a preliminary study of their mechanical and electrical properties and phase compositions showed that synthesized doped zirconia ceramics are applicable as inert matrices for next-generation nuclear dispersed fuel.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.G., R.I.S., N.O.V., D.B.B., D.I.S. and A.L.K.; methodology, S.G.G., R.I.S., N.O.V., D.B.B., D.I.S. and A.L.K.; formal analysis, S.G.G., R.I.S., N.O.V., D.B.B., D.I.S. and A.L.K.; investigation, S.G.G., R.I.S., N.O.V., D.B.B., D.I.S. and A.L.K.; resources, S.G.G., R.I.S., N.O.V., D.B.B., D.I.S. and A.L.K.; writing—original draft preparation, review, and editing, S.G.G., R.I.S., N.O.V., D.B.B., D.I.S. and A.L.K.; visualization, S.G.G., R.I.S., N.O.V., D.B.B., D.I.S. and A.L.K.; supervision, S.G.G., R.I.S., N.O.V., D.B.B., D.I.S. and A.L.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (No. AP19679979).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mistarihi, Q.M.; Raj, V.; Kim, J.H.; Ryu, H.J. Thermal Conductivity of Mo-Reinforced ZrO2 Composites Fabricated by Spark Plasma Sintering for Inert Matrix Fuels. Mater. Des. 2017, 134, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lemaignan, C.; Niepce, J. Chapter 13. Nuclear Ceramics: Fuels, Absorbers and Inert Matrices. In Ceramic Materials: Processes, Properties and Applications; Boch, P., Niepce, J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Matzke, H.; Rondinella, V.V.; Wiss, T. Materials Research on Inert Matrices: A Screening Study. J. Nucl. Mater. 1999, 274, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nandi, C.; Grover, V.; Bhandari, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Mishra, S.; Banerjee, J.; Prakash, A.; Tyagi, A.K. Exploring YSZ/ZrO2–PuO2 Systems: Candidates for Inert Matrix Fuel. J. Nucl. Mater. 2018, 508, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kulyk, V.; Duriagina, Z.; Kostryzhev, A.; Vasyliv, B.; Marenych, O. Effects of Sintering Temperature and Yttria Content on Microstructure, Phase Balance, Fracture Surface Morphology, and Strength of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sivaperumal, V.R.; Mani, R.; Polisetti, V.; Aruchamy, K.; Oh, T. Synthesis of Hydroxyapatite (HAp)-Zirconia Nanocomposite Powder and Evaluation of Its Biocompatibility: An In Vitro Study. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chee Hon Cheong, A.; Sivanesan, S. The Application of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia (YSZ). In Zirconia–New Advances, Structure, Fabrication and Applications [Working Title]; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Poznyak, A.; Pligovka, A.; Salerno, M. Anodizing of Hydrogenated Titanium and Zirconium Films. Materials 2021, 14, 7490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Garvie, R.C.; Hannink, R.H.; Pascoe, R.T. Ceramic Steel? In Sintering Key Papers; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chevalier, J.; Gremillard, L.; Virkar, A.V.; Clarke, D.R. The Tetragonal-Monoclinic Transformation in Zirconia: Lessons Learned and Future Trends. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 1901–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arnold, B. Zircon, Zirconium, Zirconia—Similar Names, Different Materials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; ISBN 978-3-662-64268-9. [Google Scholar]
  12. Drazin, J.W.; Castro, R.H.R. Phase Stability in Nanocrystals: A Predictive Diagram for Yttria–Zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 1377–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Simpson, L.A.; Carter, R.E. Oxygen Exchange and Diffusion in Calcia-Stabilized Zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1966, 49, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cales, B.; Baumard, J.F. Oxygen Semipermeability and Electronic Conductivity in Calcia-Stabilized Zirconia. J. Mater. Sci. 1982, 17, 3243–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nakamura, A.; Wagner, J.B. Defect Structure, Ionic Conductivity, and Diffusion in Calcia-Stabilized Zirconia. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1980, 127, 2325–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, A.; Kumar, P.; Dhaliwal, A.S. Phase Transformation Behavior of Ca-Doped Zirconia Sintered at Different Temperatures. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2022, 59, 370–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kostishin, V.G.; Shakirzyanov, R.I.; Nalogin, A.G.; Shcherbakov, S.V.; Isaev, I.M.; Nemirovich, M.A.; Mikhailenko, M.A.; Korobeinikov, M.V.; Mezentseva, M.P.; Salogub, D.V. Electrical and Dielectric Properties of Yttrium–Iron Ferrite Garnet Polycrystals Grown by the Radiation–Thermal Sintering Technology. Phys. Solid State 2021, 63, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Isaev, I.M.; Kostishin, V.G.; Korovushkin, V.V.; Salogub, D.V.; Shakirzyanov, R.I.; Timofeev, A.V.; Mironovich, A.Y. Magnetic and Radio-Absorbing Properties of Polycrystalline Li0.33Fe2.29Zn0.21Mn0.17O4 Spinel Ferrite. Tech. Phys. 2021, 66, 1216–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lira, C.; Fredel, M.C.; da Silveria, M.D.; Alarcon, O.E. Effect of Carbonates on Firing Shrinkage and on Moisture Expansion of Porous Ceramic Tiles. In Proceedings of the V. World Congress on Ceramic Tile Quality-Qualicer, Castellon, Spain, 8–11 March 1998; Volume 98, pp. 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aripin, H.; Priatna, E.; Dedi, D.; Sudiana, I.N.; Sabchevski, S. Characterization of Ceramic Membrane Based on Calcium Carbonate from Onyx Stone and Its Application for Coconut Sap Treatment. Int. J. Eng. 2022, 35, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Simão, L.; Montedo, O.R.K.; Caldato, R.F.; Innocentini, M.D.d.M.; Paula, M.M.d.S.; Angioletto, E.; Dal-Bó, A.G.; da Silva, L. Porous Ceramic Structures Obtained from Calcium Carbonate as Pore Generating Agent. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 775–776, 755–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Borgekov, D.B.; Zdorovets, M.V.; Kenzhina, I.E.; Shlimas, D.I. Study of Radiation Damage Kinetics in Dispersed Nuclear Fuel on Zirconium Dioxide Doped with Cerium Dioxide. J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. DIN EN ISO 6507-2:2018; Metallic Materials—Vickers Hardness Test—Part 2: Verification and Calibration of Testing Machines (ISO 6507–2:2018). DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V.: Berlin, Germany, 2018.
  24. ISO 14705:2016; Fine Ceramics (Advanced Ceramics, Advanced Technical Ceramics)—Test Method for Hardness of Monolithic Ceramics at Room Temperature. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
  25. Yin, Y.; Xu, J.; Ji, M.; Li, L.; Chen, M. A Critical Review on Sintering and Mechanical Processing of 3Y-TZP Ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 1549–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Doebelin, N.; Kleeberg, R. Profex: A Graphical User Interface for the Rietveld Refinement programBGMN. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015, 48, 1573–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Boch, P. Ceramic Materials: Processes, Properties and Applications; Nièpce, J.-C., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-1-905209-23-1. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pang, E.L.; McCandler, C.A.; Schuh, C.A. Reduced Cracking in Polycrystalline ZrO2-CeO2 Shape-Memory Ceramics by Meeting the Cofactor Conditions. SSRN Electron. J. 2019, 177, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duwez, P.; Odell, F.; Brown, F.H. Stabilization of Zirconia with Calcia and Magnesia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1952, 35, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Noguchi, T.; Mizuno, M.; Conn, W.M. Fundamental Research in Refractory System with a Solar Furnace—ZrO2 CaO System. Sol. Energy 1967, 11, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nath, D.; Singh, F.; Das, R. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis by Williamson-Hall, Halder-Wagner and Size-Strain Plot Methods of CdSe Nanoparticles—A Comparative Study. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 239, 122021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mokrushin, A.S.; Simonenko, E.P.; Simonenko, N.P.; Bukunov, K.A.; Sevastyanov, V.G.; Kuznetsov, N.T. Microstructure, Phase Composition, and Gas-Sensing Properties of Nanostructured ZrO2-xY2O3 Thin Films and Powders Obtained by the Sol-Gel Method. Ionics 2018, 25, 1259–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tarrida, M.; Larguem, H.; Madon, M. Structural Investigations of (Ca,Sr)ZrO3 and Ca(Sn,Zr)O3 Perovskite Compounds. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2009, 36, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rueden, C.T.; Schindelin, J.; Hiner, M.C.; DeZonia, B.E.; Walter, A.E.; Arena, E.T.; Eliceiri, K.W. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next Generation of Scientific Image Data. BMC Bioinform. 2017, 18, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. German, R.M. Sintering Theory and Practice; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1996; ISBN 978-0-471-05786-4. [Google Scholar]
  36. Burke, J.E.; Fulrath, R.M.; Pask, J.A. Ceramic Microstructures; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1968; ISBN 978-0-471-28720-9. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chauhan, L.; Shukla, A.K.; Sreenivas, K. Dielectric and Magnetic Properties of Nickel Ferrite Ceramics Using Crystalline Powders Derived from DL Alanine Fuel in Sol–Gel Auto-Combustion. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 8341–8351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, P.; Yao, Z.; Zhou, J.; Yang, Z.; Kong, L.B. Small Magnetic Co-Doped NiZn Ferrite/Graphene Nanocomposites and Their Dual-Region Microwave Absorption Performance. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 9738–9749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tanrıverdi, E.E.; Uzumcu, A.T.; Kavas, H.; Demir, A.; Baykal, A. Conductivity Study of Polyaniline-Cobalt Ferrite (PANI-CoFe2O4) Nanocomposite. Nano-Micro Lett. 2011, 3, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, X.; Wei, J.; Zhang, Y.; Qian, B.; Jia, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhao, X.; Shao, G. Ultralight Magnetic and Dielectric Aerogels Achieved by Metal–Organic Framework Initiated Gelation of Graphene Oxide for Enhanced Microwave Absorption. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sivakumar, N.; Narayanasamy, A.; Ponpandian, N.; Govindaraj, G. Grain Size Effect on the Dielectric Behavior of Nanostructured Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 084116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ctibor, P.; Petrášek, J.; Sedláček, J.; Neufuss, K. Dielectric Properties of CaZrO3 Coatings Made by Plasma Spraying and Bulks Fired by Spark Plasma Sintering. Mater. Res. Bull. 2020, 124, 110775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gurevich, V.L.; Tagantsev, A.K. Intrinsic Dielectric Loss in Crystals. Adv. Phys. 1991, 40, 719–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thompson, D.P.; Dickins, A.M.; Thorp, J.S. The Dielectric Properties of Zirconia. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 2267–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hannay, J.H. The Clausius-Mossotti Equation: An Alternative Derivation. Eur. J. Phys. 1983, 4, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lanagan, M.T.; Yamamoto, J.K.; Bhalla, A.; Sankar, S.G. The Dielectric Properties of Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia. Mater. Lett. 1989, 7, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Acosta, M.; Novak, N.; Rojas, V.; Patel, S.; Vaish, R.; Koruza, J.; Rossetti, G.A.; Rödel, J. BaTiO3-Based Piezoelectrics: Fundamentals, Current Status, and Perspectives. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2017, 4, 041305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, M.; Pan, N. Predictions of Effective Physical Properties of Complex Multiphase Materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2008, 63, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, H.; Kim, J.R.; Lanagan, M.J.; Trolier-McKinstry, S.; Randall, C.A. High-Energy Density Dielectrics and Capacitors for Elevated Temperatures: Ca(Zr,Ti)O3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2013, 96, 1209–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, W.S.; Su, C.Y.; Lee, Y.C.; Lin, S.P.; Yang, T. Effects of Dopant on the Dielectric Properties of CaZrO3 Ceramic Sintered in a Reducing Atmosphere. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, 5853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xing, C.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Shi, F. Precise Prediction of Dielectric Property for CaZrO3 Ceramic. J. Adv. Dielectr. 2018, 08, 1850029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sanesi, M.; Cremante, G.; Pizzini, S.; Wagner, V. On the Dielectric Constant of Zirconia and Lime-Zirconia. Z. Naturforschung A 1971, 26, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abyzov, A.M. Aluminum Oxide and Alumina Ceramics (Review). Part 1. Properties of Al2O3 and Commercial Production of Dispersed Al2O3. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2019, 60, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Amin, A.; Mumu, H.T.; Sarker, S.; Alam, Z.; Gafur, M.A. Effects of Sintering Temperature and Zirconia Content on the Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of MgO, TiO2 and CeO2 Doped Alumina–Zirconia (ZTA) Ceramic. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2022, 60, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alfahed, B.; Alayad, A. The Effect of Sintering Temperature on Vickers Microhardness and Flexural Strength of Translucent Multi-Layered Zirconia Dental Materials. Coatings 2023, 13, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rejab, N.A.; Azhar, A.Z.A.; Ratnam, M.M.; Ahmad, Z.A. The Relationship between Microstructure and Fracture Toughness of Zirconia Toughened Alumina (ZTA) Added with MgO and CeO2. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2013, 41, 522–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 13 10989 g001
Figure 1. Powder diffractograms of the obtained samples. (a) pristine; (b) Cw = 0.05; (c) Cw = 0.10; (d) Cw = 0.15; (e) Cw = 0.20; (f) Cw = 0.25.
Figure 1. Powder diffractograms of the obtained samples. (a) pristine; (b) Cw = 0.05; (c) Cw = 0.10; (d) Cw = 0.15; (e) Cw = 0.20; (f) Cw = 0.25.
Applsci 13 10989 g001
Applsci 13 10989 g002
Figure 2. W-H dependence for undoped ZrO2 (a) and Raman spectra of synthesized ceramics (b).
Figure 2. W-H dependence for undoped ZrO2 (a) and Raman spectra of synthesized ceramics (b).
Applsci 13 10989 g002
Applsci 13 10989 g003aApplsci 13 10989 g003b
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of synthesized ceramics (a) pristine; (b) Cw = 0.05; (c) Cw = 0.10; (d) Cw = 0.15; (e) Cw = 0.20; (f) Cw = 0.25.
Figure 3. SEM micrographs of synthesized ceramics (a) pristine; (b) Cw = 0.05; (c) Cw = 0.10; (d) Cw = 0.15; (e) Cw = 0.20; (f) Cw = 0.25.
Applsci 13 10989 g003aApplsci 13 10989 g003b
Applsci 13 10989 g004
Figure 4. Histograms of grain size distribution (a) pristine; (b) Cw = 0.05; (c) Cw = 0.10; (d) Cw = 0.15; (e) Cw = 0.20; (f) Cw = 0.25.
Figure 4. Histograms of grain size distribution (a) pristine; (b) Cw = 0.05; (c) Cw = 0.10; (d) Cw = 0.15; (e) Cw = 0.20; (f) Cw = 0.25.
Applsci 13 10989 g004
Applsci 13 10989 g005
Figure 5. Energy-dispersive analysis spectra for synthesized ceramic samples.
Figure 5. Energy-dispersive analysis spectra for synthesized ceramic samples.
Applsci 13 10989 g005
Applsci 13 10989 g006
Figure 6. Elemental mapping of cross-sections of fabricated specimens.
Figure 6. Elemental mapping of cross-sections of fabricated specimens.
Applsci 13 10989 g006
Applsci 13 10989 g007
Figure 7. Frequency dependences of dielectric permittivity (a) and loss tangent (b) for the obtained ceramics.
Figure 7. Frequency dependences of dielectric permittivity (a) and loss tangent (b) for the obtained ceramics.
Applsci 13 10989 g007
Applsci 13 10989 g008
Figure 8. Dependences of apparent density and dielectric constant on mass concentration of dopant (a) and dependence of microhardness HV on dopant concentration (b).
Figure 8. Dependences of apparent density and dielectric constant on mass concentration of dopant (a) and dependence of microhardness HV on dopant concentration (b).
Applsci 13 10989 g008
Table 1. Results of quantitative analysis of diffractograms via the Rietveld method for ceramics with monoclinic and cubic phases.
Table 1. Results of quantitative analysis of diffractograms via the Rietveld method for ceramics with monoclinic and cubic phases.
SampleMonoclinic PhaseCubic Phase
a, Åb, Åc, Åβ, °V, Å3XRD Density, g/cm3a, ÅV, Å3XRD Density, g/cm3
ZrO25.15095.20605.321599.22140.8555.810---
0.055.15375.20445.319199.22140.8255.8115.1272134.7856.072
0.105.14685.19735.319999.21140.4695.8265.1292134.9436.014
0.155.13675.19935.326499.21140.4205.8285.1381135.6466.033
Table 2. Results of quantitative analysis of diffractograms via the Rietveld method for ceramics with perovskite and cubic phases.
Table 2. Results of quantitative analysis of diffractograms via the Rietveld method for ceramics with perovskite and cubic phases.
SampleCubic PhasePerovskite Phase
a, ÅV, Å3XRD Density, g/cm3a, Åb, Åc, ÅV, Å3XRD Density, g/cm3
0.205.13707135.5656.0375.60015.75268.0157258.22694.612
0.255.1411135.8846.0225.59405.75618.0174258.15734.613
Table 3. Statistical parameters of Rietveld refinement and phase composition obtained from the analysis of diffractograms.
Table 3. Statistical parameters of Rietveld refinement and phase composition obtained from the analysis of diffractograms.
SampleRexpRwpGOFχ2Phase Composition, %
ZrO2-mZrO2-cCaZrO3
ZrO24.026.071.512.2810000
0.053.454.551.321.7463.4536.550
0.103.776.361.692.858.7591.250
0.153.635.851.612.602.8297.180
0.204.326.781.572.46088.6011.40
0.253.695.511.492.23064.5834.42
Table 4. Results of surface chemical composition analysis using the EDX method.
Table 4. Results of surface chemical composition analysis using the EDX method.
CwO Concentration, at.%Zr Concentration, at.%Ca Concentration, at.%
0.0054.3945.61-
0.0554.8543.971.17
0.1055.0240.244.74
0.1558.7834.836.39
0.2060.4031.178.43
0.2558.4628.0713.47
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Giniyatova, S.G.; Kozlovskiy, A.L.; Shakirzyanov, R.I.; Volodina, N.O.; Shlimas, D.I.; Borgekov, D.B. Structural, Dielectric, and Mechanical Properties of High-Content Cubic Zirconia Ceramics Obtained via Solid-State Synthesis. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10989. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910989

AMA Style

Giniyatova SG, Kozlovskiy AL, Shakirzyanov RI, Volodina NO, Shlimas DI, Borgekov DB. Structural, Dielectric, and Mechanical Properties of High-Content Cubic Zirconia Ceramics Obtained via Solid-State Synthesis. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(19):10989. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Giniyatova, Sholpan G., Artem L. Kozlovskiy, Rafael I. Shakirzyanov, Natalia O. Volodina, Dmitriy I. Shlimas, and Daryn B. Borgekov. 2023. "Structural, Dielectric, and Mechanical Properties of High-Content Cubic Zirconia Ceramics Obtained via Solid-State Synthesis" Applied Sciences 13, no. 19: 10989. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910989

APA Style

Giniyatova, S. G., Kozlovskiy, A. L., Shakirzyanov, R. I., Volodina, N. O., Shlimas, D. I., & Borgekov, D. B. (2023). Structural, Dielectric, and Mechanical Properties of High-Content Cubic Zirconia Ceramics Obtained via Solid-State Synthesis. Applied Sciences, 13(19), 10989. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910989

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop