Research on the Spatial and Temporal Differences in Public Response to Release-Type Communication to Stop Food Waste
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Design and Data Processing
2.1. Research Method
2.2. Data Collection
2.3. Data Processing
3. Result Analysis
3.1. Time Differences Analysis
3.1.1. Time Differences Analysis Based on Stage Division
3.1.2. Time Differences Analysis Based on Empirical Mode Decomposition Method
3.2. Spatial Differences Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Suggestions
5.1. Conclusions
- (1)
- With release-type communication, the public concern about the issue of food waste has gone through five stages: Incubation period, outbreak period, recession period, secondary outbreak period, and fading period. In general, the support intention shows a down-up-down trend, and the implementation intention rises and then descends. Both the support intention and implementation intention appear to have an inflection point and reach the peak during the recession period. Besides, the general effect of public support intention tends to decline while the implementation intention tends to rise by using the EMD method.
- (2)
- Public concern and emotional performance toward food waste are different in different regions, which is generally related to the regional economic development level. After release-type communication, the support intention and implementation intention are higher in West China than in East China in general.
- (3)
- The results of spatio-temporal differences analysis show the changes in the support intention and implementation intention after the release-style communication. Specifically, 11 regions, including Gansu, Guangxi, Guizhou, and Qinghai, increase the support intention. However, the support intention in six regions, including Beijing, Guangdong, and Hainan, goes negative. Moreover, the support intention in 17 regions, including Anhui, Jiangsu, Henan, and Shandong, and elsewhere, is lower at different levels. It is remarkable that the support intention has changed significantly in three regions of Beijing, Guangdong, and Fujian. In terms of the implementation intention, 14 regions (such as Gansu, Tibet, Xinjiang, and Hebei) increase, while 18 regions decrease in varying degrees (such as Beijing, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Shandong). Among them, the implementation intention of Shanghai significantly increases, while Shandong significantly decreases.
5.2. Suggestions
- (1)
- New Vitality Injection Strategy at Inflection Point Based on Time Perspective
- (2)
- Territorial Differential Governance Strategies Based on Spatial Perspective
- (3)
- Balance Both Support Intention and Implementation Intention
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- General Office of the CPC Central Committee. Opinions on Practicing Strict Economy and Combating Food Waste [EB/OL]. 2014. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2014/content_2644806.htm (accessed on 18 March 2014).
- Lin, B.; Guan, C.X. Determinants of household food waste reduction intention in China: The role of perceived government control. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. Circular on Further Strengthening the Work of Saving Food and Combating Waste [EB/OL]. 2010. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2010-01/22/content_1517138.htm (accessed on 18 January 2010).
- Wang, L.F.; Yang, Y.Q.; Wang, G.Y. The Clean Your Plate Campaign: Resisting Table Food Waste in an Unstable World. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, M.; Wang, X.B.; Yu, X.H. Does dietary knowledge affect household food waste in the developing economy of China? Food Policy 2021, 98, 101896. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, F.; Qing, P.; Sun, S.; Liu, B. All roads lead to Rome: The impact of communication types on food waste behavior. Chin. Rural. Econ. 2018, 5, 35–51. [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton, S.F.; Richards, T.J. Food policy and household food waste. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2019, 101, 597–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhang, M. Will environmental regulations affect subjective well-being?—A cross-region analysis in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 29191–29211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bruggeman, J.; Sprik, R.; Quax, R. Spontaneous cooperation for public goods. J. Math. Sociol. 2020, 45, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, H.; Tan, D.Q.; Zhang, J.Q.; Han, W. Evolutionary game analysison herding behavior of non-direct stakeholders in mass emergencies. Manag. Rev. 2019, 31, 254–266. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.M. The effects of conservation awareness to conservation behavior: An interaction and moderation effect model in Chinese cultural context. Manag. World 2013, 8, 77–90. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, T.; Durif, F.; Robinot, E. Can eco-design packaging reduce consumer food waste? an experimental study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 162, 120342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adeyanju, M. Public knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward Kansas mandatory seat-belt use: Implications for public health policy. J. Health Soc. Policy 1991, 3, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gaebler, S.; Potrafke, N.; Roesel, F. Compulsory voting and political participation: Empirical evidence from Austria. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2020, 81, 103499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, A.; Jiao, D.D.; Liu, T.L. Online detection of public attitudes towards China’s second-child policy: A linguistic analysis of social media responses. Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol. 2019, 1, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Attiq, S.; Habib, M.D.; Kaur, P.; Hasni MJ, S.; Dhir, A. Drivers of food waste reduction behaviour in the household context. Food Qual. Prefer. 2021, 94, 104300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raziq, M.M.; Ahmed, Q.M.; Ahmad, M.; Yusaf, S.; Sajjad, A.; Waheed, S. Advertising skepticism, need for cognition and consumers’ attitudes. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2018, 6, 678–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mcquail, D. Mcquail’s Mass Communication Theory; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Stensota, H.O.; Bendz, A. Public response to welfare policy retrenchment: The importance of trust in implementing agencies. the case of early retirement in Sweden 1999–2010. Soc. Policy Adm. 2020, 54, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, M.; Mark, L.; Marina, L. Tracking social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case study of lockdown in New York State. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 187, 115797. [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds, C.; Goucher, L.; Quested, T.; Bromley, S.; Gillick, S.; Wells, V.K.; Evans, D.; Koh, L.; Kanyama, A.C.; Katzeff, C.; et al. Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions—What works and how to design better interventions. Food Policy 2019, 83, 7–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, W.T.; Kian, Y.K.; Pei, S.C. The role of social media in food waste prevention behaviour. Br. Food J. 2020, 124, 1680–1696. [Google Scholar]
- Gunarathne, A.; Spiller, A.; Risius, A. Public acceptability of government interventions to re-duce obesity: Policy effectiveness, policy fairness, government trust and political ideology. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2020, 79, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jabeen, F.; Dhir, A.; Islam, N.; Talwar, S.; Papa, A. Emotions and food waste behavior: Do habit and facilitating conditions matter? J. Bus. Res. 2023, 155, 113356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Breckler, S.J. Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct compo-nents of attitude. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1984, 47, 1191–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, Y.; Song, Q.; Liu, G.; Li, J. Uncovering residents and restaurants’ attitude and willingness toward effective food waste management: A case study of macau. Waste Manag. 2021, 130, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, M.J.; Hall, C.M.; Kim, D.K. Predicting environmentally friendly eating out behavior by value-attitude-behavior theory: Does being vegetarian reduce food waste? J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 797–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.H. Which Consumer Perceptions Should Be Used in Food Waste Reduction Campaigns: Food Security, Food Safety or Environmental Concerns? Sustainability 2022, 14, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, M.; Reynolds, R. The Elaboration Likelihood Model and the Sleeper Effect: An Assessment of Attitude Change over Time. Commun. Theory 1993, 3, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Vuuren, D.P.; Bijl, D.L.; Bogaart, P.; Stehfest, E.; Biemans, H.; Dekker, S.C.; Doelman, J.C.; Gernaat, D.E.H.J.; Harmsen, M. Integrated scenarios to support analysis of the food–energy–water nexus. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 1132–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semenza, D.C.; Bernau, J.A. Information-seeking in the wake of tragedy: An examination of public response to mass shootings using google search data. Sociol. Perspect. 2020, 65, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zilrahmi, Z.; Wijayanto, H.; Afendi, F.M.; Bakri, R. Study on emd method for predicting the price of curly red chili in indonesia. Indones. J. Stats Its Appl. 2020, 4, 374–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, G.; Zheng, J. A decomposition-clustering-ensemble learning ap-proach for solar radiation forecasting. Sol. Energy 2018, 163, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Zheng, X.Y. Walsh Transform and Empirical Mode Decomposition Applied to Reconstruction of Velocity and Displacement from Seismic Acceleration Measurement. Appl. Sci. 2022, 10, 3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Feng, X.; Xu, B. Study on the poverty reduction effect of rural residents in China from the perspective of heterogeneity: A new decomposition method based on FGT poverty index. Stat. Res. 2020, 37, 44–55. [Google Scholar]
- Qian, L.; Li, F.; Cao, B.; Wang, L.; Jin, S. Determinants of food waste generation in Chinese university canteens: Evidence from 9192 university students. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.H.; Cai, S.J.; Wang, Y.J. The institutional and policy logic of the implementation of the environmental protection supervision system in China. Manag. World 2020, 36, 160–172. [Google Scholar]
- Hou, J.; Jin, Y.J.; Chen, F.Y. Should waste separation be mandatory? a study on public’s re-sponse to the policies in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, S. Searching for New Human Behavior Model in Explaining Energy Transition: Exploring the Impact of Value and Perception Factors on Inconsistency of Attitude toward Policy Support and Intention to Pay for Energy Transition. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 18, 11352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kritikou, T.; Panagiotakos, D.; Abeliotis, K.; Lasaridi, K. Investigating the determinants of greek households food waste prevention behaviour. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.F. Integrating the extended theory of planned behavior model and the food-related routines to explain food waste behavior. Br. Food J. 2022; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayşen, C.; Raife MY, Ö. What influences consumer food waste behavior in restaurants? An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Waste Manag. 2020, 117, 170–178. [Google Scholar]
- Kong, J.Y.; Teng, G.Q.; Wang, S.M.; Rui, T. Impact of party’s responses on netizens’ emotions in public opinion. Libr. Inf. Serv. 2020, 64, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, F.; Pang, H.; Xia, X.; Shao, X.; Wu, J. COVID-19 Information Contact and Participation Analysis and Dynamic Prediction in the Chinese Sina-Microblog. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2021, 507, 125788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, N.E.; Shen, Z.; Long, S.R.; Wu, M.C.; Shih, H.H.; Zheng, Q.; Yen, N.-C.; Tung, C.C.; Liu, H.H. The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1998, 454, 903–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korotin, V.; Dolgonosov, M.; Popov, V.; Korotina, O.; Korolkova, I. The ukrainian crisis, economic sanctions, oil shock and commodity currency analysis based on EMD approach. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 2019, 48, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerciello, M.; Agovino, M.; Garofalo, A. Estimating food waste under the FUSIONS defini-tion: What are the driving factors of food waste in the Italian provinces? Environ. Dev. Ment Sustain. 2019, 21, 1139–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.P.; Li, X. Study on Macao residents’ support intention towards independent visitor scheme: The moderating role of local attachment. World Reg. Stud. 2019, 28, 181–192. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed, S.; Stewart, A.; Smith, E.; Warne, T.; Byker Shanks, C. Consumer Perceptions, Behaviors, and Knowledge of Food Waste in a Rural American State. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 734785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beate, R. Knowledge and perception of food waste among German consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 166, 641–648. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, Y.; Lin, X.K. Financial development and the effectiveness of monetary policy. J. Bank. Financ. 2016, 68, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Velde, L.; Schuilenburg, L.; Thrivikraman, J.; Numans, M.; Kiefte-de Jong, J. Exploring the needs and perceptions regarding healthy eating among people at risk of food insecurity: A qualitative analysis. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2020, 79, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhong, F.; Bai, J.; Cheng, S. Food-away-from-home plate waste in China: Preference for variety and quantity. Food Policy 2020, 97, 101918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, L.; Cao, S.; Gong, S.; Huang, L. Motivations and obstructions of minimizing suboptimal food waste in Chinese households. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 342, 130951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jean, C.B.; Jeffrey, H. Total and per capita value of food loss in the United States. Food Policy. 2012, 37, 561–570. [Google Scholar]
- Nikolaus, C.J.; Nickols-Richardson, S.M.; Ellison, B. Wasted food: A qualitative study of U.S. young adults’ perceptions, beliefs and behaviors. Appetite 2018, 130, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Madni, G.R.; Anwar, M.A. Exploring rural inhabitants’ perceptions towards food wastage during COVID-19 lockdowns: Implications for food security in Pakistan. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0264534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carolin, V.K.; Daniel, F. Preventing household food waste via nudging: An exploration of consumer perceptions. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, G.L.; Bai, Y. Voluntary or forced different effects of personal and social norms on urban residents’ environmental protection behavior. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erkut, H. Incentivized measurement of social norms using coordination games. Anal. Krit. 2020, 42, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teng, C.C.; Wang, Y.C.; Chuang, C.J. Food choice motives and dining-out leftover prevention behavior: Integrated perspectives of planned behavior and norm activation. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 107, 103309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dill, K.E.; Anderson, C.A.; Anderson, K.B.; Deuser, W.E. Effects of aggressive personality on social expectations and social perceptions. J. Res. Personal. 1997, 31, 272–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chang, G.Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, W.X. Perceptions of peasants in Minqin County for the water conservation polices of Shiyang River basin and their effects. J. Arid. Land Resour. Environ. 2016, 30, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, J.; Li, J.J.; Yang, X.R. Why consumer’s word is not in agreement with their deed: Study on factors impeding green consumption behavior. J. Huazhong Agric. Univ. 2015, 5, 72–81. [Google Scholar]
- Aschemann-Witzel, J.; De Hooge, I.; Amani, P.; Bech-Larsen, T.; Oostindjer, M. Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability 2015, 7, 6457–6477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lazell, J. Consumer food waste behaviour in universities: Sharing as a means of prevention. J. Consum. Behav. 2016, 15, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schanes, K.; Dobernig, K.; Gözet, B. Food waste matters-A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 182, 978–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, C.; Wang, M.; Li, W. The impact of motivation, intention, and contextual factors on green purchasing behavior: New energy vehicles as an example. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 1249–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickinson, D.L.; Dutcher, E.G.; Rodet, C.S. Observed punishment spillover effects: A laboratory investigation of behavior in a social dilemma. Exp. Econ. 2015, 18, 136–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabitzer, T.; Hartl, B.; Marth, S.; Hofmann, E.; Penz, E. Preventing Conflicts in Sharing Communities as a Means of Promoting Sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Knud, S.L. Deviancy and Choice in Cooperative and Punishment Situations. J. Soc. Psychol. 1972, 86, 247–249. [Google Scholar]
- Li, T.; Chen, Y. Do regulations always work? the moderate effects of reinforcement sensitiv-ity on deviant tourist behavior intention. J. Travel Res. 2019, 58, 1317–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clemons, K.; Johnson, D.B.; Kiger, A.; Putnam, J. Decreasing campus smoking with pinishments and social pressures. Contemp. Econ. Policy 2018, 36, 629–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aaron, K.; David, A.G.; Thomas, J.M. School Punishment in the US and England: Divergent Frames and Responses. Youth Justice 2015, 15, 3–22. [Google Scholar]
- Higgins, E.T. Beyond pleasure and pain. Am. Psychol. 1997, 52, 1280–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tam, K.-P. Anthropomorphism of nature, environmental guilt, and pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- He, R.; Jin, J.; Gong, H.; Tian, Y. The role of risk preferences and loss aversion in farmers’ en-ergy-efficient appliance use behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 215, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mi, L.; Zhao, J.; Xu, T.; Yang, H.; Lv, T.; Shang, K.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, Z. How does COVID-19 emergency cognition influence public pro-environmental behavioral intentions? An affective event perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 168, 105467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Flanagan, A.; Priyadarshini, A. A study of consumer behaviour towards food-waste in Ireland: Attitudes, quantities and global warming potentials. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 284, 112046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Support Intention | Implementation Intention | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provinces | Means | Provinces | Means | Provinces | Means | Provinces | Means |
Gansu | 0.3 | Shandong | 0.07 | Hebei | 0.34 | Chongqing | 0.18 |
Taiwan | 0.27 | Henan | 0.07 | Tibet | 0.31 | Sichuan | 0.18 |
Tibet | 0.23 | Anhui | 0.05 | Shanxi | 0.31 | Taiwan | 0.18 |
Hunan | 0.23 | Hubei | 0.05 | Gansu | 0.26 | Macau | 0.18 |
Guizhou | 0.22 | Shanxi | 0.05 | Shanghai | 0.26 | Jilin | 0.16 |
Qinghai | 0.2 | Shanghai | 0.05 | Xinjiang | 0.24 | Jiangsu | 0.16 |
Hebei | 0.2 | Fujian | 0.04 | Hubei | 0.24 | Tianjin | 0.16 |
Guangxi | 0.2 | Chongqing | 0.04 | Jiangxi | 0.24 | Zhejiang | 0.14 |
Xinjiang | 0.19 | Zhejiang | 0.02 | Henan | 0.23 | Guangdong | 0.13 |
Sichuan | 0.17 | Jiangsu | 0.01 | Shaanxi | 0.23 | Yunnan | 0.12 |
Jiangxi | 0.17 | Liaoning | 0.01 | Fujian | 0.23 | Shandong | 0.12 |
Heilongjiang | 0.15 | Guangdong | −0.01 | Guizhou | 0.22 | Guangxi | 0.11 |
Tianjin | 0.13 | Macau | −0.09 | Hunan | 0.21 | Anhui | 0.11 |
Inner Mongolia | 0.11 | Hainan | −0.12 | Ningxia | 0.2 | Inner Mongolia | 0.11 |
Shaanxi | 0.11 | Yunnan | −0.15 | Qinghai | 0.2 | Beijing | 0.1 |
Ningxia | 0.1 | Beijing | −0.15 | Liaoning | 0.19 | Hainan | 0.08 |
Jilin | 0.08 | Hong Kong | −0.21 | Heilongjiang | 0.18 | Hong Kong | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, F.; Gao, C.; Gu, X.; Yue, T. Research on the Spatial and Temporal Differences in Public Response to Release-Type Communication to Stop Food Waste. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020736
Chen F, Gao C, Gu X, Yue T. Research on the Spatial and Temporal Differences in Public Response to Release-Type Communication to Stop Food Waste. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(2):736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020736
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Feiyu, Chenchen Gao, Xiao Gu, and Ting Yue. 2023. "Research on the Spatial and Temporal Differences in Public Response to Release-Type Communication to Stop Food Waste" Applied Sciences 13, no. 2: 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020736
APA StyleChen, F., Gao, C., Gu, X., & Yue, T. (2023). Research on the Spatial and Temporal Differences in Public Response to Release-Type Communication to Stop Food Waste. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 736. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020736