Numerical Modeling of the Geotechnical and Structural Strengthening of Quay Structures with a Case Study

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper is very interesting and well prepared.  The nature of practicality and the presentation of an issue that physically concerns the implementation of a construction investment are very important.  The author presented the entire background of the computational and technological situation, and then developed a numerical model that allows for an optimal assessment of the situation.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The author of the paper uses correct English.  However, it is a simple and not very sophisticated language, which is not a disadvantage in the presented topic.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I read the article 'Numerical Modelling of the Geotechnical and Structural Strengthening of Quay Structures with a Case Study,' which presents a case study regarding geotechnical investigations that supported numerical modeling for strengthening a port's structure. I believe the work is relevant, but it needs better presentation. All the figures in the paper have low-resolution quality. It is very difficult to visualize the information in the figures, and in some of them, it is impossible to read the content. If the information in these figures is irrelevant, I suggest removing them or recreating the figures with larger fonts. I believe the article needs improvements in the introduction, focusing on demonstrating the real advantages and improvements proposed in the study compared to previous works. Another topic that needs improvement is the methodology. The information is disjointed. SPT tests are mentioned, and these need a better description of the methodology for readers less familiar with geotechnical tests, along with results that seem to be from laboratory tests. This needs to be clarified throughout the text. The numerical modeling used in the Plaxis software also needs a revision, in my opinion. Using other studies with modeling conducted in geotechnical studies with the same tool can be an interesting strategy that will greatly enhance the article. All my comments made in the text are in the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English Language should be revised and improved. Throughout the text. Please do it.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

It seems to me that the author overall implemented the suggestions.